405 words
Adolf Hitler was born on April 20, 1889. In commemoration of his birth, I wish to draw your attention to the following pieces on this website.
Hitler’s Significance for Our Struggle
- Greg Johnson, “The Burden of Hitler” (French translation here)
- William Pierce, “The Measure of Greatness” (French translation here)
- Irmin Vinson, “Some Thoughts on Hitler” (French translation here)
Historical Accounts of Hitler and the Third Reich
- Kerry Bolton, “Breaking the Bondage of Interest: A Right Answer to Usury,” Part 4
- Amanda Bradley, “Nazi Fashion Wars,” Part 1 and Part 2 (French translation here)
- Veronica Kuzniar Clarke, “Demystification of the Birth & Funding of the NSDAP,” Part 1 and Part 2
- Léon Degrelle, “The Enigma of Hitler”
- Léon Degrelle, “Hitler’s Social Revolution,” Part 1 and Part 2
- Andrew Hamilton, “When Mussolini Scorned Hitler”
- Andrew Hamilton, “What is the Best Hitler Biography?”
- Andrew Hamilton, “What if Germany has One?: Hitler’s Britain”
- Andrew Hamilton, “Pan-Nationalism”
- Greg Johnson, Review of Nasser Ghaemi’s A First-Rate Madness
- Anthony M. Ludovici, “Hitler and the Third Reich”
- Anthony M. Ludovici, “Hitler and Nietzsche”
- Anthony M. Ludovici, “My Education,” Part III
- Daniel W. Michaels, “Exposing Stalin’s Plan to Conquer Europe” (French translation here)
- Mark Weber, “The Enduring Allure of Hitlerism: Hitler as Enlightenment Intellectual”
Significant Admirers of Hitler
- Kerry Bolton, “Henry Williamson”
- Kerry Bolton, “Knut Hamsun”
- Mark Deavin, “Henry Williamson: Nature’s Visionary”
- Mark Deavin, “Knut Hamsun and the Cause of Europe”
- Andrew Hamilton, “Alfred Rosenberg in Translation”
- Greg Johnson, “Remembering Martin Heidegger”
- Michael O’Meara, “Heidegger ‘The Nazi’”
- Miguel Serrano, “Hitler and Jung”
Film in the Third Reich
- Jonathan Bowden, “Hans-Jürgen Syberberg—Leni Riefenstahl’s Heir”
- Lyle Burkhead, “Ministry of Illusion: Film in the Third Reich”
- Jef Costello, “Disingenuous Genius: A Tribute to Leni Riefenstahl”
- Derek Hawthorne, “Opfergang: Masterpiece of National Socialist Cinema”
- Derek Hawthorne, “S.O.S. Iceberg”
- Derek Hawthorne, “Storm Over Mount Blanc”
- Derek Hawthorne, “The White Hell of Piz Palü”
- Derek Hawthorne, “The Holy Mountain”
- Derek Hawthorne, “North Face: The Return of the German Mountain Film”
- Martin Lichtmesz, “Kolberg Revisited”
The Legacy of Hitler and National Socialism:
- R. G. Fowler, “Woman Against Time: Remembering Savitri Devi’s 100th Birthday” (translations: German, French, Norwegian, Czech)
- Greg Johnson, Review of Farnham O’Reilly’s Hyperborean Home (French translation here)
- Alex Kurtagić, Review of Miguel Serrano’s The Golden Thread
- William Pierce, “Rockwell: A National Socialist Life”
- Savitri Devi, “The Religion of the Strong”
- Savitri Devi, “Incurable Decadence”
- Savitri Devi, “Race, Economics, and Kindness: The Ideal World”
Humor
- Jim Goad, “Adolf Hitler: History’s Angriest Jew?”
- Richard Hoste, “All-Time Leading Hitlers”
16 comments
TYSPOMYDDA- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-6L_hT3QtQ
In appreciation for Mein Kampf, we offer this inspiration:
Jed DeValleyism’s Racism Test, from his “Forbidden thoughts on the dangers of Diversity and Inclusion,” 2011:
Imagine that all the full blooded black Negroes in New Orleans traded places with an equal number full blooded white Nordics from North Germany.
Crime in New Orleans will stay the same, increase, or decrease?
Crime in North Germany will stay the same, increase, or decrease?
If you said that crime in New Orleans will decrease and crime in North Germany will increase, you are a “vile, disgusting, ignorant, sick racist.”
The greatest man that ever lived!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIb2WSFUqGM
Hitler was right about international finance and right about Jews.
Lew,
What’s the source of the Rabbi Reichorn’s quote?
Hitler’s legacy is a testament to the great irony of living in the Kali Yuga. The greatest man yet to be born of the modern age has been slandered and vilified to the point where he has become the very symbol of evil. It fills me with despair when I reflect on the fact that the Anglo element of the germanic population was tricked into sacrificing close to a million of its best young men to destroy the movement which had the potential to bring about our salvation.
Even though I’m definitely not fond of Hitler myself (he’d probably think the same of me), he did have many good ideas. The “volksgemeinschaft” idea of an ethnic community was very admirable. Germany was reborn from the ashes during his reign, the German people thrived, and the Third Reich became the only racial state in the 20th century. Not a small accomplishment, that.
Ironically, the constant demonizing of Hitler by the media will ensure that nobody will ever forget him.
Despite all the inducements to say otherwise, all of Hitler’s personal staff (maids, cooks, butlers, chauffeurs, secretaries, etc.) seem to have stuck by the story that H. was kind, considerate and a had a remarkably well-balanced personality. Check out, by way of stRiki-Eiking contrast, the appalling stories that Civil Rights hero LBJ’s underlings have told about him.
That said, Erich Koch was a stunningly bad choice for RK of Ukraine. He was such a good recruiter for the Partisans that the latter decided against an assassination attempt.
Despite all the inducements to say otherwise, all of Hitler’s personal staff (maids, cooks, butlers, chauffeurs, secretaries, etc.) seem to have stuck by the story that H. was kind, considerate and a had a remarkably well-balanced personality.
Yes, the ridiculous stereotype of Hitler as a mouth-foaming lunatic is rather widespread. I may not agree with all the things the man did, but he was most definitely a sane person. He wasn’t any more “insane” than Genghis Khan or Julius Caesar or Alexander the Great were.
That said, Erich Koch was a stunningly bad choice for RK of Ukraine.
Koch was actually a “good” choice, from Hitler’s point of view. To someone who views Ukrainians as biologically inferior scum, appointing this man to RK of Ukraine would be a no-brainer. Hitler knew exactly what would happen when he appointed Koch, despite the loud protests from Alfred Rosenberg and the Wehrmacht high command.
Ukraine during WW2 was basically a story of evil vs. evil. The only guys who come out look good were the UPA, and even they were rather morally ambiguous.
There is no evidence Hitler beleived the Ukrainians were “biologically inferior scum”, as you so poetically put it.
So much to read, so little time. Thanks, I have found some books I should read to help fill in the holes in my head.
Henry Ford alludes to wars being a Jewish “harvest” in Chapter 3 of The International Jew.
When I looked it up, I discovered this quote is usually attributed to a 19th century Rabbi named Reichorn. It’s all over the internet on anti-Jewish sites hosted by sundry anti-Semites (mostly WNists and Muslims). I haven’t been able to locate the original source. Given this, it’s possible the quote is a fabrication and has been falsely attributed to a Jewish rabbi in the same way The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were also falsely attributed to Jews. There is a discrepancy as to when Reichorn supposedly said it. On some web sites, the quote is attributed to Reichorn in 1869 and on others it’s 1859.
If I recall correctly, one reason William Pierce rejected the authenticity of the Protocols was because Jews don’t generally speak so openly about their plans. Using this logic, perhaps the authenticity of Reichorn quote should be rejected out of hand for this reason alone — Jews do not always express their pathological hate so openly. On the other hand, however, sometimes they do just that. In the Old Testament, the Jewish God and Jews speak often of the need to cheat and kill non-Jews, and Jews openly express their hatred of non-Jews in the Talmud as well.
Even if the quote is a fabrication, it still accurately captures how Jews think. There is plenty of evidence besides that quote that modern wars are at least partially a Jewish harvest.
Meant as a response to Me up top.
Koch was actually a “good” choice, from Hitler’s point of view. To someone who views Ukrainians as biologically inferior scum, appointing this man to RK of Ukraine would be a no-brainer.
The other point of view is that Hitler primarily viewed Ukraine as a primarily a buffer against
the inevitable second Anglo-American starvation blockade.
Lew, thank you very much for your response!
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.