Counter-Currents
White Riot:
Assimilation & Cultural Death in England
Francis Alexander
Photo by Amy Weston
1,042 words
German translation here
As an ethnocentric white man, well aware that the mainstream media do not report the racial character of non-white violence, I closely examined photographs of the recent riots that have occurred in England. To my dismay I saw new numerous white youths participating in the violence. Most of the rioter’s faces were concealed, making it difficult to determine their race, and though they were most probably a minority, the number of white rioters was sizable.
This is something many racialist writers have ignored, reacted on instinct, and attributed sole responsibility to the Negro colony. What I am writing is not to let the blacks of the hook but use this as a way of objectively analyzing the shortcomings of my own people, to illustrate the scale of our tasks in regenerating them. If you do not believe in my basic premise, take a look at these pictures http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2024120/London-riots-2011-suspects-Photos-released-know-looters.html
How did this come to be? The sort of looting that occurred is normally something only done by Negroes. The simple answer is that a substantial proportion of English white working class youth have adopted Negro folkways in a very thorough and total manner. In the US the closest equivalent is the Wigger phenomena. This differs in that Wiggers are simply young whites who act black and do so as a youthful and foolish idiosyncracy, something they grow out of, because a grown man looks stupid with his baggy jeans round round his knees and a backward baseball cap.
We don’t have Wiggers in the UK, we have instead, chavs: alternatively known as rude boys, pikeys, townies, hoodies, or feral youths. For them, Negro speech, attitudes, dress, musical tastes, and disorganized criminality come to them completely naturally and spontaneously, and are a badge of social station and identity. They are not even conscious of imitating aliens. There is no affectation there; their negrification is deep-set. Can one imagine your typical middle-class American wigger joining a Negro riot?
I thought not, and that is the difference.
How is all this even possible? Well, one of the advantages of being primitive is that blacks have a natural and intuitive understanding of ethnocentrism. They refer to blacks who act white as “Bounties,” after the coconut-chocolate bar that is black on the outside and, white in the inside. These feral white youths on the other hand, are like a sandwich full of excrement: white on the outside and black on the inside. To put it in Evolian terms their race of the body is white, their race of the soul is Negro, and their like almost every one else in our society incoherently nihilistic.
All of this proves the point made by Guillaume Faye that assimilation is cultural death, which results not only in African and Asians being superficially Westernized but also in European culture being Africanized and Islamified.
Assimilation has done its work too well in England. Most middle-class English people have non-white friends, and I myself have met privately educated Asians with manner and outlook identical to native rahs (rah being slang for the tattered and plutocratic remnants of the English gentry). If worse is better, then better (i.e. “successful” assimilation) is also definitely worse.
One of the reasons that the British National Party has failed to enjoy the sort of breakthroughs that other national-populist parties have is that race relations in the UK are simply somewhat “better” than they are in the rest of Europe, i.e. less tense and therefore less likely to produce racial awakening. In turn, one of the reasons they emphasize Islam so much is that they are the one group to remain culturally as well as racially alien, and even many of them have been integrated into a basically bourgeois life style
There are number of reasons why this is the case.
The first of all is that the English, are still quite culturally confident in a sort of effortless way. Unlike Scandinavians or White Americans, they are not ashamed of who they are; white guilt is probably as uncommon as white pride. The English are too reserved for either to really resonate.
Despite this, they are unfortunately lacking in the aggressive ethnocentrism of the French, Italians, or Flems, which angers and humiliates the colonizing population, thereby further provoking a backlash from an already hostile population. The English are too polite.
A further factor is the strength of the class system, which results in non-whites being happy to imitate the manner of whatever class they belong to, for Blacks this is the feral underclass, whose manners they have changed in turn, for Asians either the lower or upper- middle classes depending upon whether they are Muslims or from one of the higher IQ groups.
A final factor is that much of the non-white population is dispersed in penny packets. There is no equivalent of America’s inner cities and France’s banlieus, which provide the territory needed to form strong non-white identities. Thus loyalty in the underclass is to soil rather than blood; specifically to whatever estate they live on. They refer to it as their “ends,” what Americans would call a housing project. The idea of multi-racial looters loyal to some ghastly warren of sub-Corbussian architecture may seem fantastical to Americans, but such is the poisoned fruit of our ever so successful assimilation.
In persuading the English people to put race before economic class, and blood before money; to persuade them to vote for a party willing to deport their non-white personal friends and acquaintances, in all these things English nationalists face an uphill task. Regardless, they must persevere or the English people will be dispossessed without resistance and go quietly into the night convinced that their Afro-Asian colonizers and future masters, are in fact, just like them: English.
We must therefore emphasize more than ever that a people is defined not by shared customs or legal status but by ancestry, continuous identity and a sense of a sacred presence. To appeal solely to culture or customs is to be disarmed, given that docile and intelligent non-white immigrants can absorb our culture, while stupid and surly ones can drag the lowest elements of our people down with them, to their convulsive and chthonic depths of post-modern urban ferality.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
37 comments
The white underclass in Great Britain has grown up with no morals or heroes to worship. Most are from bad genetic stock and low-grade human material. The welfare state has been responsible for breeding and nurturing them. They see the tough black subculture of Rap as strong and manly. They see nothing strong or aggressive in pop music or boy bands. Also, most are outnumbered in the multiracial hellholes they live in. If you can’t beat them join them…
Other parts of the UK that suffered riots were Salford, Manchester. This is a particular scummy area of underclass whites. They rioted for the sheer want and destruction and hatred of the police. They are the epitome of those depicted in (Jew) Danielle Barbers Harry Brown (check it out). The white underclass is so debased it’s beyond reach and salvation (and that also means those in Liverpool). Nationalism needs to reach out to those among the youth who can think for themselves (and not nerds or geeks). It also needs tough kids to spread its message. This is another reason Nationalism must push the fighting spirit amongst its youth. The underclass white population are tough and merciless. No good having all the answers to our problems if you can’t back it up, is it??? Exactly!
If non – Islamic peoples and their cultures had not come to England, then Nationalism would be in serious trouble. The writer of this article was right onto that. Well spotted!!!
Anyway, all is not lost on the white youth of Great Britain..
Jews don’t go round rioting in England. London was indeed a CHIMPOUT!!! Other parts like Salford, Manchester were white underclass.
It was only one photo out of more than a dozen and may well have been an honest mistake. The daily mail appeals to implicitly pro-white sentiment and would be happy to blame these riots on immigrants,so they have no reason to shift the blame from non-whites, as thankfully they don’t care about making them look bad. Despite this they still idiotically denounce the BNP
Besides do you actually have any personal experience of dealing with the white english underclass? If you do then whites looting, is not implausible. These people, thieve, harass and rob on a routine basis. Opportunistic looting is not uncharacteristic. What do you have base it being one or two percent, rather than ten or twenty, other than that was what we both wish was the case?
In any case my broader point about the white underclass adopting negro values and sub-culture stands true.
“…and may well have been an honest mistake.”
Are you kidding me? It was as deliberate and intentional as it could be. They cut/cropped photos to show only a white guy and put it at the top of the page along with several other cropped photos of white men. How do you figure that qualifies as a mistake, honest or otherwise?
I started looking for the white element on TV depictions early on, as I was a bit surprised, as one would not have seen any whites among the Rodney King riots in the USA, for e.g. I wonder whether there is a certain element of anarchists trying to epxloit the situation? Some of the white rioters, such as the chap carrying the toy horse, have that certain look that seems to characterize anarchists far and wide – f…’n obnoxious.
Lothrop Stoddard (Revolt Against Civilisation) can teach us alot about the phenomenon – the ‘revolt of the underman’, of both ‘degenerates’ and ‘primitives’ who feel the ‘burden of civilisation.’ Also La Bon in ‘The Crowd.’
Gustave Le Bon discussed the “underman” at length in The Psychology of Socialism, not The Crowd. Among other things, Le Bon remarked:
“We cannot deny that if a benevolent deity were to suppress in every generation the increasing army of the degenerates which we so carefully protect he would be rendering an immense service to civilisation and to the degenerates themselves; but since our humanitarian sentiments demand that we should preserve them and favour their reproduction we can but suffer the consequences of these sentiments. At all events we know that all these degenerates . . . constitute an element of inferior vitality, comparable to a cancer implanted in healthy tissues, and all their efforts tend to abolish a civilisation which inevitably results in their own misery.”
“. . . the special conditions of the age have immensely multiplied the crowd of the unadapted. This multitude of incapable, disinherited, or degenerate persons is a grave danger to civilisation. United in a common hatred of the society in which they can find no place, they demand nothing but to fight against it. They form an army ready for all revolutions, having nothing to lose and everything to gain — at least, in appearance. Above all, this army is ready for all works of destruction. Nothing is more natural than the sentiment of hatred which these outcasts entertain for a civilisation that is too complicated for them, and to which they are perfectly sensible that they can never adapt themselves. They only wait for the occasion to rise to the assault.”
However, The Crowd is well worth reading concerning the behaviour of crowds in general, and criminal crowds in particular.
Louis Zoul’s Thugs and Communists might be worth reading concerning the underman. Revilo P. Oliver seems to have rated it highly.
Lothrop Stoddard’s The Revolt Against Civilization has been recently reprinted. It’s a pity that the cover didn’t use the illustration for the German edition depicting an evil looking rat with red eyes lurking in the dark. It’s a powerful image: it makes one want to smash the head of the rat with a hammer.
With such large portions of our White Humanity submerging itself in negrodom, it is becoming hard to care about the survival of any of us.
The Doomsday bomb would have solve all of this for us, and the White space aliens could have come back and started over, but this time making their offspring’s DNA un-mixable with Negros.
Despite this, they are unfortunately lacking in the aggressive ethnocentrism of the French, Italians, or Flems [= Flemish]
What makes you think that some of the whites rioting–assuming that some of them are indeed white–aren’t antifa/Trotskyite/Communist rabble?
I’ ll admit that the blacks started it over the shooting and the whites only joined in, but that does n’t change the fact they did join in, which is somewhat exceptional. As to the party advocating repatriation; I did not have a particular party in mind only english or white nationalists who are in favour of that policy.
Sorry that was addressed to neuzig. I don’t think it was the left because it would be uncharacteristic of them in that they prefer to attack public buildings and multi-nationals rather than any old business. Furthermore they tend to link their actions to some fatuous political demand rather than simply grab stuff. Besides if it was the anarchists the MSM would have milked that; they hate them almost as much as they hate us.
Unfortunately for your thesis chavs don’t loot if another chav gets shot by the police. The lamestream media have made a concerted effort to obscure the racial nature of the looters, unfortunately, with this article, you are aiding them. Also what party did you have in mind whose manifesto is to deport non-whites from Britain? I’m not aware of one such in my area (inner-city London) which is controlled by a Labour/Liberal cabal.
Thank you for writing this – it’s the best explanation of the multiracial aspect of the riots that I’ve read so far anywhere.
As I saw whites in hoodies and hip hop gear joining in the looting, I have to confess I thought “whiggers” – but your description of how the whigger thing works in England is an education for me, if depressing.
Other than to say well done, I don’t have much to add except that there’s a rather obvious parallel between these riots in the England and the black flash mob “raids” that we’ve been seeing here in the states for the past year or so.
The tactics are the same: using smartphones to congregate in large, overwhelming numbers at a particular place and then loot at will before the cops show up, and then melt away. The big difference being that this flash mob raid in England happened on a much larger scale. And yet, for obviously being more or less the same phenomenon, I’ve yet to see the mainstream media connect the dots. Instead we see explanation after possible explanation for why these “youths” did it. Any explanation other than the right one: a riot of ferals, engaging in opportunistic looting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAGTE_RGN4c&feature=player_embedded#at=87
Maybe he read the piece; meta-politics in action. I hope his career his survives and that this is something of a “Sarrazin moment”, i.e. one that ignites a wrenching debate.
I agree entirely with Helvena. We can be sure the photos and TV clips were selected with an eye toward showing as much White involvement as possible.
Of course they were, but the fact that The Enemy enlarges something for its own purpose doesn’t mean that it did not originally exist in the first place
A lot of comments seem to be to missing the point. I stated that whites were a minority and it is self evident that at least SOME rioters were white. Nobody has any stats on the racial makeup yet so arguing over how big or small the white minority was, is just guessing and projection.
The article was ultimately about more than the fact that a few white youths joined negro looting. It was about the africanisation of white english youth; a rather more serious subject, and a reality impossible for anyone who actually knows england firsthand and well, to dispute. I live I london and the number of whites I have heard using the Caribbean patois is maddening.
Thank you for a very good analysis of why things are bad, and will not – CAN not – get any better.
One point worthy of mention, that has not been emphasized enough.
The wonderful, insightful, brilliant police systems of the various British detective series, the Prime Suspect series, and especially Spooks, are seen as overwhelmed by the masses that are literally overpowering the local constabulary. Yes, turning Sherlock Holmes on bad men doing bad things inspires the confidence that the people who are running things really can fix things, if they have a mind to.
I think this is the moment that demonstrates they have no mind to, at least, when the working class, which is no longer needed, is concerned. Broke Britain has chavs on benefit, for generations, and such virility as boys are allowed are usually in spite of the system, as the “Afro-Caribbean” crowd shows. Boys abandoned join gangs, and the dismemberment of a really effective little army has left them no positive force to align themselves with.
Demoralized young men, seeing themselves as powerless, dispossessed, and constructively abandoned. Where have we seen this before?
The riots (Toxeth?), born of the First Austerity, that led to the formation of the Skinhead Response. Able to afford only boots and braces as their uniform, they did so. Yet, the nominally White chavs are only a hollow echo of the Skinhead Response. Ian Stewart, et. al., did not realize they and those like them had been thrown over the side, and were still loyal to what they thought Britain was, and could be again, with the right sort of “leadership.”
They, like White Nationalists prior to Rockwell and Covington, thought the barely disguised enmity of the State to them, and those of their class/Race, was a temporary aberration in the order of things. It wasn’t, but they were not yet demoralized to the point of the impotence of nihilism, depression internalized and worshipped as the natural state of affairs.
It was not an aberration. It was the new status quo. They simply could not conceptualize that the State’s fondest wish was for their displacement, and replacement.
The chavs are worse, for they have no ability to define themselves in greater terms. They identify with the only Masculine power they see, and they do so as much as the lack of a better alternative than they do merely as a matter of survival. Their identification is with the estate, and, at most, extends to the football clubs. A synthetic, inorganic, manufactured nation is their only perceivable choice of identity beyond themselves. People who have not seen “soccer hooligans” fired up and ready to go really underestimate the sheer potential for, well, ultraviolence they offer, and display.
They turn on BBC and see David Dimbleby eviscerate the BNP, openly mocking and scorning them, and they see no mention of themselves at all when Jon Snow speaks on Channel 4. What is their future but soft despair?
Mind you, this has all been done, as Peter Shank so astutely noted, without one shot being fired at them, solely through control of the pictures they see, and the words they hear.
The Skinhead Response was based on their being a big misunderstanding. The State simply ignored them.
The Afro-Chav Response is based on a very clear understanding, never formally articulated, but very clearly defined. The State wants them to fade away, slowly. The measures of the Second Austerity will include a lower benefit, balanced out by greater access to tranquilizers for them. Where have we seen this before?
“Brave New World,” written during the early phases of the First Great Depression.
You may draw you own conclusions. The end – the genocide of the White Race – is preceded by the demoralization process, leading directly to nihilism, the soft equivalent of suicide. It would seem they are of too poor a quality to be transformed into men who are as sleek as greyhounds, and as hard as British Steel. Broken boys, broken spirits, broken men, Broke Britain. Sadly, no Sherlocks. Forunately, no Moriartys.
Perhaps I’m wrong. Whatever happened to the Skinheads, anyway? Did they become Onslow, or something? If so, what does that imply for the chavs?
What’s In YOUR Future? Focus Northwest!
How can one not agree with Starkey?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gU5TcTSa9kk
The attached video sums it all up. More and more of our pople are infected with the plague
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qcm1DYtGPNE
No matter the spinning, the end result is that multiculturalism/multiracialism has at least taken a black eye. England is a small country, and I’m sure more than a few people experienced the fact, either first hand or through credible stories from friends and family, that the rioters were overwhelmingly non-white. The brazenly transparent attempts of the media to suppress, spin and obfuscate will also be noticed by many. Also noticed will be the negative press spin on working class whites peacefully patrolling their neighborhoods, compared to the rather glowing coverage given to Sikhs, arrayed as an ethnic block replete with hatches, axes, and other rather menacing implements of destruction, “coming together” to protect “all communities.”
The British press is truly sickening, now having to undertake contortions of truth and logic so extreme as to make itself appear utterly pathetic, perhaps even in the eyes of normal people.
Even if we concede that many whites joined in, the anti-white establishment is still not off the hook. The Left has always claimed that the non-whites would assimilate on a fundamental level, and whatever multiculturalism that is “left over” will be benign and charming, such as wonderful ethnic food eateries scattered about. How nice! (never mind that some of the best pizza I’ve ever had was not made by Italians, nor the best hamburgers by Germans, much lest residents of Hamburg. But apparently it is beyond the pay grade of whites to make a decent taco or some egg drop soup – so let’s become a despised minority in our own lands instead)
It is becoming increasingly apparent, especially with the relatively well known chav phenomenon and now the riots, that in fact a segment of whites are themselves being assimilated, and into destructive forms of behavior that are ever harder to deny and cover up. We see this whigger phenomenon all over the United States.
Back in the 60’s, the establishment was able to blame black riots on white racism. By the time of the Rodney King riots, that charge was becoming harder and harder to make stick. Now, in Britain? Of course the anti-white establishment will try for a repeat performance, and to a degree they might succeed, but excuse is really becoming thin gruel. We may not be there yet, but I think we’re getting closer and closer to the day where it will become more mainstream to simply ask, “Why are they here, and why in the world should we want more of them?”
The bottom line is that, at the very least, it is becoming increasingly obvious to people that things aren’t working out the way the anti-white establishment always claimed it would. System legitimacy continues to crater.
“Assimilation has done its work too well in England. Most middle-class English people have non-white friends, and I myself have met privately educated Asians with manner and outlook identical to native rahs (rah being slang for the tattered and plutocratic remnants of the English gentry). If worse is better, then better (i.e. “successful” assimilation) is also definitely worse.”
This is a key problem, especially in the UK, and one I haven’t seen discussed before. I’m surprised no one in the comments section has addressed it yet. I’ve had middle class non-white friends myself and I got on with them, and would get on with them again if we were still in touch, better than with a lot of whites especially those of another social class. It’s an issue that merits some serious attention in my opinion. I can imagine this subject defeating unprepared white advocates in debate too if it was ever raised (There was something like it in Jamie Kelso’s encounter with the Ron Paul Youth and we all saw what happened).
I’m not sure about the rest of Western Europe but I can assure you Americans that the British underclass problem is very real. I’m not at all surprised they were represented among the rioters in considerable numbers.
A most interesting development in England, for sure; low IQ Negroes with a strong sense of grievance, racial animosity (the ‘ass’, or Negritude, if you will), and low IQ, culturally Negroized, malevolent White rabble on the rampage, and in full riot mode. What a loony multi-culti ‘combo’ on the sceptered isle! A real inter-racial Mad Hatter’s Tea Party of Wilberforce proportions. Too bad that Operation Sea Lion was cancelled in 1940, it was sorely needed.
My take on all this is simple, CUT THE BS”
What has happened is obvious to anyone with half a brain, just bloody obvious. It’s the clash of unassimilable 3rd world peoples thrust onto white nations. Oh, of course there are one or two exceptions among them, just as there are some exceptions among our own white people as well.
The fundamental question is this: why do Cameron and the rest of the so-called western ‘leaders’, who know as well as we do what the problem is, stick to the “diversity is our greatest strength” BS?
Do we really think these ‘leaders’ believe the BS they spew forth? Are we that stupid as to try and make them see what’s is really going on? They know what’s going on as well as we do! They agree with us! But, they are told by their puppet masters to support diversity and in exchange, they get …..
And, we? What do we get. We get The Camp of Saints.
I think you’re right to an extent. I think many Conservatives are non-ideological and venal. From Peter Hitchens’ blog (not that I’m a big fan (any more!)):
‘I have never forgotten October 2, 2009, when David Cameron paid his first instalment to Rupert Murdoch, in return for his papers’ support in the coming Election. He promised a closer engagement in Afghanistan – ‘If I’m Prime Minister, Whitehall will go to war from minute one, hour one, day one that I walk through the door of Downing Street.'”
But have you forgotten ‘bigotgate’? Gordon Brown sounded like your classic cultural marxist and I imagine that’s probably the norm in the Labour and Lib Dem parties, not to mention the youth, the women and the freaks in the Tories.
I agree with Helvena. People should be more critical, this is pretty obvious anti-white propaganda. The media/police scrolled through reams of CCTV footage to find every white face to post on the fron’t page. Look at the top row of cropped photos–all white guys except for one black? L.O.L They had to add at least one black or it would have been too obvious.
I’ve read London has one of the highest concentrations of CCTV cameras in the world. There must have been thousands, maybe tens of thousands that weren’t shown. Remember that these mobs were described by witnesses as in the hundreds. Who selected these and why were these few selected out of the thousands available?
The 2 pictures of the “white” guy pointed out by Helvena is the exact same photo. The one near the top is a cropped version of the one near the bottom. In the photo at the bottom the 2 black guys were cut out. Why was the white guy in this group photo singled out for special attention at the top? Are they only looking for the white guys and not the blacks?
How do we know these “white” youths are even white. We don’t. The police don’t even know who they are.
Also it would be very easy to recruit highly networked jewish groups (antifa, jewish EDL, etc) to provide some “white” faces in an otherwise black mob, especially if jews were the ones organizing the blacks using one of their jew-owned social media networks.
Is Blackberry’s encrypted secure messaging being used to organize black mob violence in the UK and black “flash mobs’ in the US?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44076411/ns/technology_and_science-wireless/
What I wanted to say in my earlier comment was this: are Cameron and the rest of the western ‘leaders’ animated by the carrot or the stick? Are they blackmailed or bought? When, afterall, in the history of humantiy have traitors worked for free?
The carrot is the stick. Jewish money and jewish media coverage can be blandished and withdrawn according to their behaviour.In many cases neither: they are brain-dead conformists with skulls full of mush. They believe in what everyone else in the global over-class believes. The alternative is inconceivable to them. I very much doubt that Cameron wants to destroy the white race, he probably doesn’t even know its in danger. It not like he gets his daily news from TOO.
“I’ve had middle class non-white friends myself and I got on with them, and would get on with them again if we were still in touch, better than with a lot of whites especially those of another social class.”
Yes, this is indeed a problem, but I don’t believe that it will prove to be decisive. When everything is “good,” the fact that a person has some non-white friends may indeed be a hinderance in persuading him of our position, for the natural reason that he won’t want to trash someone that he sees as a friend, but even then we can still put some points on the board. Non-white friends or not, the joys of diversity – crime, discrimination against whites, cultural degradation, politically correct suppression of our basic freedoms, etc. – are still evident.
And when things get not so good, which they are/will, a lot of people are going to notice that their non-white friends, sweethearts that they are, aren’t exactly very helpful. That personable non-white at the office may smile at you and play the role of buddy, but where is he when it comes to anti-white discrimination? Where is he when it comes to all sorts of anti-white policies? He smiles at you, then he goes into the ballot box and votes for the candidate that supports HIS ethnic interests, not yours. Then he smiles at you again when he emerges from the booth, and you can share a joke together.
As things progress beyond the ballot box, his true loyalties will become even more evident.
All these whites that have non-white friends, and I must include myself in this group, must ask themselves: “If there are so many great non-whites in my country, why is it that there is not a single non-white group that speaks up for white interests? Why is there not a single non-white group that speaks out against the obvious wrongs against whites? After all, every day hundreds of white groups meet in church basements and school auditoriums all over the country trying to help out some non-white group or another. Every single day, decade after decade, this goes on. Why is there never a case of the reverse? Why is there never a single one, ever?”
Hmmm.
Truth is that almost all of the “good” and “nice” non-whites, well, they really aren’t all that good and nice. Not when you get right down to it. Exceptions are rare indeed, though I will admit to having known one. Even he recognizes that he is an outlier to the point of absurdity.
These sorts of friendships will not be able to stop the tectonic shifts that are happening. They are a minor irritation at worse, and only thrive in a society where gross hypocrisy and the self-serving behaviors of “nice” non-whites can be more or less swept under the table. But as the non-white percentages rise, that era must inevitably come to a close. To use America as an example, it was one thing for whites to carry non-whites back in the 60’s when they only made up about 10 percent of the population. But now the percentages are getting so high that it is becoming impossible to maintain the status quo. We are nearing the breaking point, and these more imagined than real friendships will not prevent that.
I don’t understand why everyone is so critical of white rioters. The government and shadow rule they live under is anti-white, therefore white youth apart from being more or less forced to become blacks with white skin through Hollywood movies etc pushing black role models on them are also without a country today as the ruling elites are giving what was their country away to blacks and browns. So what do people want actually? That these white youths should remain loyal to the very government and country that is selling them down the river?
It begins with demoralizaion, and it ends with the genocide of the white Race.
Helvena in blockquote:
I see it as they have been abandoned by all, and are tolerated by the Coloreds. They “ape black behavior” because this is the behavior pattern of the permanent underclass, as Dalrymple notes. My point above about the Skinheads remains unaddressed, I suspect because it hits too close to home for too many. A comment tying that point into your analysis follows.
Nonetheless, there remains a core of ruthless competency at the heart of the British nation, centered around England. This is an example we would do well to learn from.
THIS is a point well worthy of discussion.
Above, I asked:
Take your point, and link it to Faye’s working with Jews, out of necessity, because the much greater threat presents itself. Now, the many whites who do “need leadership,” and do have “aggression,” find no positive source for one, or outlet for the other, within the status quo. Let’s call the status quo “BNP.”
There it is.
The chavs are useful up to a point, and their fear of the Africans among them – virile, ruthless Alpha males for their milieu – forces them to adopt a policy of servitude, and of followership. Stockholm syndrome, pure and simple.
The fathers of the chavs were of the same demographic as the Skinheads. The collapse of the economic need for such people is reflected in a generation raised on the benefit, who have no hope, other than how Man United is doing this week.
The same pattern Greg Johnson identified is carried forward; demoralized beyond comprehension, they have already surrendered, and are all but already dead to anything other than sensate gratification. They accept and adopt the values and practices of the Africans in Britain because they are the strongest and most dominant masculine force available. The lack of Real Men as Fathers – the Patriarchy, a term synonymous with Fatherhood – creates a vacuum the Alpha Males, even if they are evil, will fill.
Abstract concepts are simply little more than marketing tools; “democracy,” “equality,” “fairness.” They know they have been thrown over the side over thirty years ago. Thatcher made it official. All other politicians since united this policy with practice, for all ends of the political spectrum.
That takes us to your strongest observation,”Embrace these people and don’t write them off like the BNP and government have.”
Is there a group that has done this?
Yes, the Jewish financed, Jewish controlled, England Defense League.
In politics, anything beats nothing, and the little bit of money the Jews spend controlling the EDL seems to offer them the best of all worlds, with the new “boots’n’braces” crowd going after the Muslims “extremists” with the joy of finally having an outlet for their frustrations. Not the best outlet, of course, but it is something, and that beats nothing, any day of the week.
What would it have cost the BNP to have created something like this, as a Youth Auxiliary, with local reading groups discussing Enoch Powell, and Rudyard Kipling? Precious little, all things considered. Why didn’t they do so? Why not ask them? Why not ask them what is more important than building an active foundation and organization for the young boys who need the firm guidance, and leadership by example, of real men? The answer seems to be, everything they could have done, at the expense of what little they have accomplished.
“Well, Onslow, how’s Liverpool doing? Aren’t those your old boots and braces in the closet over there? You looked quite handsome in them, you know.”
Genocide. Soft, silent, and sweet.
What’s In YOUR Future? Focus Northwest!
Helvena:
Is it my imagination, or is the EDL simply the NF, back with a different purpose, turned around on itself, and stripped of the pretensions that led to the gelding of the BNP? Has the demographic base of the NF simply gone full circle, morphing into its ideological opposite?
What’s In YOUR Future? Focus Northwest!
Originally posted by Helvena:
“Step back for a minute. We are a group that is supposedly concerned about the white race and yet words like *chivs*, *white trash* *lower class* (as if an upper class ever really existed) are used to describe our own people. Shame on us. If these people ape black behavior it is because the blacks embraced them when their own people wouldn’t, residual class snobbery. And quite frankly most of the upper class Brits I’m met are there not because of what they’ve done but because of what the inherited. The very few whites that took apart in these riots need leadership. The great many white Brits that could provide leadership need aggression. Embrace these people and don’t write them off like the BNP and government have.”
This is no different to the kind of lazy moralizing from afar attitude we get from ivory tower liberals. YOU don’t have to live among these people (I assume you don’t since you spelt “chavs” as “chivs”). These are the kinds of white scum who hounded Francecca Pilkington and her disabled daughter Fiona for YEARS until the mother, in her utter despair, killed her daughter and then herself.
There’s this idea among some white nationalists that if only even these members of our race could be drafted into military service then they could be magically turned into valuable members of White society. Well, who do you think commits the petty “war crimes” we so often hear about? These people have almost no redeeming values apart from a dog like courage. This strain has always been among us but recently their numbers have swelled because of Britain’s state funded dysgenics program.
I probably don’t share your fetishist view of race. I think it makes good sense to weed out psychopaths and career criminals even *gasp* if they are white. Basically the traditional conservative approach to crime. My position on eugenics (and race come to that) is pretty much Kevin Macdonald’s. Nothing sinister about it. What are you suggesting exactly? That there is a place for people like Pilkington’s tormentors in the aftermath of some kind of restoration or revolution just because they’re white? What about us peasants who have to live with them?
Hurin: We are battling the genocide of the white Race.
If you want to destroy a society, destroy the Warrior Caste, in the womb if possible, and outside the womb, with soft gelding, delivered relentlessly from birth forward. Multiculturalism, and State-mandated tolerance of the intolerable, are simply means towards this end.
The average American really has no concept of what council living is like, and the power of the chavs (and their African/Caribbean leaders) to totally destroy the basic elements of Civilization is granted. The demoralization that leads to soft suicide has hit critical mass for the chavs, and they have nothing, nothing to lose, and nothing greater than themselves to live for. They are feral versions of Charlie Brown.
The questions I asked about the Skinheads remain:
Where did these people come from, and what can be done about them?
The answers seem to be (1) “I don’t know,” and (2) “Nothing.”
Illiterate, innumerate, and with values worthy of a Third Word native (surprise!) I can only watch in awe as an England is developing that resembles Dickens with electricity. Vast swathes of their Posterity have been abandoned, and culturally gelded. It is impossible to turn Birmingham into Singapore, but Birmingham COULD have become New Singapore, if the Leadership hadn’t rejected Uncle Adolph’s NINE peace overtures, and had then adopted his Leibniziain model of national development.
The chavs, and the African/Caribbeans have won this round; a few token arrests, and even more nominal “punishments,” guarantee things will get worse, much worse, and they will not get better. Period. Quite the contrary. They can’t, and, after all, why should they?
That takes us to a larger issue, and that is the NF, which was the foundation for the BNP, made the same classic mistake described quite ably by Alex Linder, in seeking “the paste-glass jewel of middle-class respectability.” By seeking the approval of those who have no interest whatsoever in granting you such approval, you end up being Charlie Brown; rather, it seems, like the BNP as portrayed on the BBC.
The very mention of Enoch Powell terrifies the System. Can anyone doubt the prescience of Powell’s “Rivers of Blood” speech, now that the chavs and the African/Caribbeans have drawn blood, and like the taste of it?
This does not mean we can not light a small candle, and hope to attract the best of those who would otherwise fall blindly into the darkness that befalls them.
The Solution MUST come from outside the System, which is implacably determined to destroy all that is not of the System, even as the System itself fails all but a few. Their purpose, for the rest of us, and the best of us, is genocide, pure and simple. We ought to Do Something about that.
What’s In YOUR Future? Focus Northwest!
Well said Fourmyle of Ceres.
The only way people can be made equal is if they are all brought down to the lowest common denominator – eg. the lowering USA school performance stadards.
Same goes with culture. The lower can never rise to the higer, but the higher can be debased into the lower. The significant numbers of ‘gansta’ whites involved in the riots is a case in point.
Perhaps the time has come for us to start talking about higher and lower again, and stop this, “We’re not higher, or lower, just different” nonsense.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment