2,248 words
Today, January 27, is annual Holocaust Memorial Day, that day when, in schools all across the “guilty” West, children are told to stop for a moment and consider the enormity of a crime which, unless they happen to be German, they and their ancestors were not even in any way responsible for.
I was involved in marking this very same occasion myself once, back when I was a trainee teacher in north-west England around twenty years ago, when I rather foolishly decided it would be a good idea to dress up as Reinhard Heydrich and have students join me in a chorus of “Sieg Heil!” to recreate the Wannsee Conference in the classroom. Like the Final Solution itself, my plan did not succeed.
Declining Memory
If I was a trainee teacher today, there is far less chance I would ever have been involved in such an occasion at all. The Holocaust Memorial Day Trust charity designed to encourage commemorative events in British schools was only created as late as 2005, a full sixty years after the Holocaust had already ended. This was the exact same time-period as I was embarking upon a new career in the classroom, so I suppose I was one of the very first educators enlisted to take part, and almost certainly the first one to do so dressed as Herr Obergruppenführer Heydrich.
Up until 2023, the number of UK high schools holding Holocaust Memorial Day (HMD) events was rising year after year, with over 2,000 signing up to do so in 2023, from a total of about 4,000 eligible such institutions nationwide. Then came Hamas’ mini-Holocaust of October 7, 2023 over in Israel, after which numbers of participating schools began to plummet more quickly than a faulty paraglider. In 2024, there were fewer than 1,200 joining in, and only 854 in 2025, a fall of over 50 percent. Why?
Britain’s Chief Rabbi, Sir Ephraim Mirvis, guesses many teachers were simply taking “the path of least resistance” in the face of hostility from students and parents. He was too diplomatic to add “mainly Muslim ones” but he really should have, as some British schools in areas with shifting demographics have hijacked the whole thing to make it about what they perceive as being the Jewish-led genocide now going on against their co-religionists in Gaza instead. In 2024, the Islamic Human Rights Commission, an Iran-linked group, sent a letter to 460 local UK councils urging them to boycott HMD events in their schools and elsewhere, saying it was “morally unacceptable” to mark the 1940s Nazi Holocaust but not the 2020s Israeli one.
Some hard-Left white teachers are also involved in this kind of thing, but you could easily argue they’re just assimilating and colluding with their future demographic masters. It is obvious who is mainly driving all this: brown Muslims and white Leftists, not the white Right. If it was mainly neo-Nazi skinhead kids or parents who were responsible for intimidating headteachers into cancelling HMD lessons, Rabbi Mervis wouldn’t have hesitated a single second to name and shame those responsible, would he?
Brotherhood of Manchester
And so we see the main problem with Holocaust Memorial Day in a demographically ruined country like Great Britain. In the shape of the UK’s four million Muslims, the very people who have been invited to settle within a formerly racially homogenous society which was once almost completely safe for Jews to inhabit are the ones who are most likely to one day begin killing large numbers of Jews there.
And yet, bizarrely, one of the main reasons certain more fanatically open-borders Jewish organizations and individuals have blindly spent decades agitating for these very same people to be admitted into the country is precisely to prevent an anticipated “Second Holocaust” occurring there (see my pieces here, here and here for some of the specific fools involved). Even though no First Holocaust ever actually happened in Great Britain at all, but in a different country, Germany, which Great Britain fought against in WWII.
It is sometimes said (and sometimes disputed) that, from the 1650s onwards, not a single Jew anywhere across England was ever killed simply for the fact of happening to be Jewish, not even individuals as intensely annoying as Ed Miliband or Miriam Margoyles—until as recently as last year, when one was finally stabbed to death at his synagogue in the city of Manchester. By—you guessed it!—an imported Muslim. And one whose actual name was “Jihad” to boot; just imagine the furor if a white man christened “Lebensraum” had done that.
You can purchase Jonathan Bowden’s The Cultured Thug here.
Admittedly, one stabbing does not a genocide make: but every little bit helps, as the popular budget British supermarket slogan goes, and this time the incipient Islam-directed future UK Holocaust is intended to be much more of a piecemeal collective effort, not a centrally directed one as in 1940s Germany. Also in Manchester last year, two men were convicted of plotting to obtain AK-47s, attend a mass gathering, and slaughter as many local Jews as was possible, deliberately including children and pensioners, possibly even by targeting a Jewish school. For maximum irony, maybe they could have penciled the massacre in their diaries for Holocaust Memorial Day itself?
Although they did praise Hitler, these two men, who described Jews as “pigs and monkeys” were not Nazis. So what were they? The fact that their names were Walid Saadaoui and Amar Hussein and were immigrants from Tunisia and Kuwait should give readers a little clue.
One 2019 HMD poll revealed that as many as 5 percent of the UK population do not believe that the Holocaust took place at all. Meanwhile, the most recent census data available back in 2019 indicated that the then-Muslim population of the UK was. . . 5 percent. Just saying. No wonder so many British Jews are now thinking about fleeing the country to escape all the Islamic golems some wanted to see shipped in as a demographic bulwark to supposedly keep them “safe” from the virtually non-existent dangers of white supremacism there.
Holo Victory
Obviously, not all UK Muslims deny the Holocaust occurred. In 2016, 34 percent told pollsters they just wish Jews would shut up about it for once, because they really don’t care. For some strange reason, no figures seem to be available on this particular issue, but I would bet there’s a fair possibility that, despite the allegedly profound dangers of neo-Nazism in today’s West, there are actually far more Muslims in the modern world who admire the Nazis than there are white people who do so: just look at this entertaining piece from a German newspaper decrying how many Pakistanis love Hitler, for example.
And yet who is it that the global Holocaust industry (as some critics view it) implies is the major danger to future Jewish life in the West? White people. On a surface level, there is an obvious-seeming reason for this implication: the Nazis were white. Yet it does not follow from this that all white people are Nazis, or that every white nation is Nazi Germany. The very idea is a pure false syllogism. But the implication of much Holocaust education material is otherwise: if the Holocaust ever comes “again” in Great Britain (where it never even took place anyway), it will be white people who are inevitably responsible, it seems.
Specifically, a narrative appears being pushed through HMD materials which suggests that “If you don’t let all the fleeing foreigners into Europe today, and elect neo-fascist closed-borders governments to send them away, you’ll all turn back [sic] into Nazis, and we’ll all end up getting gassed again!” when, in fact, the precise reverse is probably true.
Surprisingly, today’s HMD materials do not focus purely upon the Jewish Holocaust, but also on generic pro-refugee material relevant to the current moment. Besides short biographies of actual Jewish people killed by the Nazis, as you may expect, the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust’s website also features profiles of individuals like the following to be discussed in British schools:
I’m not saying the above individuals are Jew-haters and wannabe Jew-killers themselves personally—Michel there even says he married a Jew, and not simply after an ISIS-style kidnapping and forced conversion scenario. But if you let millions upon millions of these people into the country, a very substantial proportion will be wannabe Jew-killers, won’t they?
Mosab Abdulkarim al-Gassas, for example, a man so enthusiastic about genocide he even changed his surname by deed-poll to become a reference to Zyklon-B, is an illegal Palestinian immigrant who sailed into the UK by dinghy in 2023 before being arrested after posting footage saying the following on social media:
Allah, it is upon you to [deal with] the Jews and those loyal to them. Allah, kill them one by one, and don’t leave a single one. Allah, destroy them completely, disperse them completely, and make the earth fall from under their feet.
And yet, if Allah the All-Merciful proves himself a little too Merciful in this respect, some may guess Mr. al-Zyklon might potentially be more than prepared to take matters into his own hands and hurry things along a little bit, given photos of himself like these he has proudly showed off online:
Is he a white Nazi from the 1940s? No, so he won’t ever find himself included as a human warning on any Holocaust Memorial Day lesson plans, unlike my old cosplay chum Reinhard Heydrich. But who are the real biggest threat to Jews in the UK right now? Dead white Nazis who never actually lived here anyway, or living brown Islamists who have been foolishly invited into the country in order to somehow make it “safer” for Jews to live in by aspiring to kill them all in the name of Allah?
And yet what are British students taught to believe on HMD day? Don’t be racist against Muslim “refugees.” If I was a British Jew, being racist against lunatics like al-Gassas would be precisely what I would be encouraging my kids to become. Instead, for HMD you have small, malleable infants being indoctrinated via lesson-plans to write generically “anti-racist” doggerel agitprop poems like the following piece called “Racism,” spewed out to order by an eight-year-old girl:
If hate was an animal,
It would be a green eyed python
If hate was a place,
It would be the bottom of the ocean
If hate was an illness,
It would be the black plague
If love was a season,
It would be a warm summer
If love was a food,
It would be a birthday cake with six candles
Love is like a big fat juicy yellow mango
No, “if hate was an animal,” he would be Mosab Abdulkarim al-Gassas; and “If hate was a place,” it would be Birmingham or Tower Hamlets.
Gullible children are not the only captive audience for all this. Even British prisoners can’t get away without participating!
Has anyone told Amnesty International?
Memorial To Their Own Stupidity
I’m not against teaching children about the Holocaust, but it should be purely in History lessons, in an objective and factual manner (e.g., no lies about “special soap”), not as an isolated separate day which is increasingly morphing into a mere front for emotional blackmail to allow ever more incompatible immigrants into the country.
Although there is another option. Rather than Holocaust Memorial Day, its organizers should shamefacedly admit the truth, rebrand its name more accurately to Holocaust Anticipation Day instead, and instruct survivors to go into schools and deliver the following highly apologetic pre-scripted speech:
Children—I am afraid we have made a terrible mistake. Ironically, as Jews, we have committed a collective Blood Libel against the white race. The Nazi Holocaust was, in the white Western world as a whole, a self-evident one-off aberration. In much of the Muslim world, by contrast, it is more like a constant future aspiration. By advocating for the continual importation of non-white Muslims and others into your homelands, which were once 99 percent safe for us even up to a few short decades ago, certain more fanatical and wrong-headed idiots amongst our number have not only endangered the lives of our own ordinary people (many of whom had nothing personally to do with this stupidity), but those of our generous hosts. Jewish activist groups’ ceaseless refrain of “Never again!” was understandable and unobjectionable in and of itself. Yet, in being hysterically directed mainly towards perfectly innocent groups of people like the white British who never even committed the Holocaust in the first place, such a message has, ironically, become one of the best means available of ensuring precisely that it does happen again, via its insane co-option to keep on pushing the open-borders cause for groups like Muslims. Therefore, the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust would like to take this opportunity to make a very public about-turn and demand the precise reverse instead: seal the borders and send them all back before it’s too late for everyone!
I’d like to see them give a speech like that, anyway, but we all know they won’t. Instead, when the gas really does finally hit the ventilation-fan, those delusional open-borders Jewish activists that are still left in Great Britain will probably just get out on the next boat to Israel, its lovely closed borders sealed over with big fat concrete-and-steel walls, while they still can. Leaving the rest of us still stranded here to deal with the problem they have moronically themselves helped create.
Once the Muslims finally do take over, will we have a differently rebranded new national school educational event called Holocaust Celebration Day, I wonder?
23 comments
This article, although of excellent quality, fails to grasp Jewish psychology. Destroying white countries was never intended to prevent a second Holocaust in the first place. And as the author reminds us : England, for example, and by extension the United States, never participated in the Holocaust); they even fought against the Nazis to save the Jews.
( The Anglo-Saxon world is the most pro-Semitic of all, and the most safe with its pro-Hebrew Protestantism. )
No. This is pure, racial hatred and a desire for genocidal revenge, because white people, regardless of their nationality, wanted to get rid of them. And yes, it was in Germany, but all white people are now guilty through racial participation.
( Jewish inbreeding and psychic disorders such as hysteria, paranoia, contribute too ).
It goes back way further than WW II. They’re still pissed off about the Roman destruction of the temple in Jerusalem in 70 AD. And they’re so overflowing with hate they have extended the blame for that incident beyond Rome to the rest of Europe and the US. I’ll give them one thing: they sure know how to hold a grudge.
And even before the Romans, if we want to go back even further (the Philistines, the Greeks, “the Aryans” to simplify). But I think we can admit that this has been amplified to the point of pure madness with their Nazism obsession.
When I visited Jewish Museum in Amsterdam, I had impression, that Ukrainian “holocaust” under Bogdan Khmelnitzkiy in the 17th century is for them no less important, than the years 1939-1945.
They need to realize that their own behavior is by far the number one cause of their public relations problems.
Similarly, I’m sure the negroes will see the error of their ooking ways as well.
Admirable that you try to instill a hypothetical sense of compassion, understanding, responsibility and self reflection upon jews near the end of the article. But that’s your good genes talking. There is no redemption for them or us until we remove them from western civilisation.
Foll me once, fool me 6 gorillian times..
Speaking of unrealistic numbers, no doubt the muslim and horde population figures are way above any data in the west. We keep accuratw records but horde members dont, and have been spilled into our lands undocumented, engaged in black market, social welfare, multiple identity fraud and much more.
A big spring clean is needed.
Great article! Hitler warned us about the jews, he said we would regret taking their side. 🙃
>”but I would bet there’s a fair possibility that, despite the allegedly profound dangers of neo-Nazism in today’s West, there are actually far more Muslims in the modern world who admire the Nazis than there are white people who do so”
It’s absolutely true. If you are critical about Israel to a Lebanese or an Egyptian, they’ll often break out the Sieg Heils. They admire Hitler over in that part of the world, and of course, Ba’athism itself is based off of European Fascism.
As to the dissonance between the expressed Muslim hatred towards jews, and the hyperfocus on white gentiles by jewish organizations, one could turn to the boomer question. A lot of jews with wealth are elderly, they came into age in the 60s, where their parents raised them to be terrified of the idea of another holocaust. A holocaust at the hands of a white majority society. People don’t change their views much as they age, and they’re especially inelastic with their views in old age. If you look with a fine eye, you can see some of the generational differences with the younger jews getting a bit prissy at the incorrect threat calculations coming from the older jews. They still advocate for their ethnic interests of course, but with nuance about who is a threat and why. The younger jews like Konstantin Kristin, Andrew Gold and Ben Shapiro are much softer on their anti-white positions.
Both first presidents of new republican Egypt, Nasser and Sadat, were very pro-German during the WW2, not so much because they liked A.H., rather because they wanted to get German help for the liberation of Egypt of the yoke of British Empire.
Great comment!
It’s hard to imagine, 60-80 years after the end of WWII, what kind of memory-presence and emotional salience that conflict had in the first 10-20 years after 1945 (i.e. the time period during which the war-born generation and the early Boomers grew up, as you point out).
“The Past is a Foreign Country” [L.P. Hartley] is arguably the most important aphorism for making sense of history. Context is king
Barbara Lerner-Spectre never did say exactly who would resent the Jews for forcing multi-culturism, (code word for mass European conquest and replacement), upon Europe. I wonder if she and her husband appreciate the irony of it all. I’m sure they have early dibs on a planned high rise in Gaza.
I confess I would adopt a more full throated white nationalism but for the enormity of the Holocaust, which stands as a constant warning about where these ideas can lead. To consider the magnitude of the crime, we obliterated not only innocent lives, but the most creative segment of humanity. Where would that creative power have taken mankind by the turn of the twenty first century? As a lover of western civilization, I would ask how you guys reconcile these facts with your white nationalism?
I assume that you are being sarcastic.
🙂
And the worst part is, no.
It’s a complete inversion of reality, since European races are the most creative and Jews have been recognized since time immemorial as the destroyers of civilization. But anyway, no point arguing about it, such is the absurdity.
In what sense is it an inversion? This great crime lives in all of us of European descent, does it not?
No it does not. There is no such thing as racially collective and hereditary guilt.
As for Jewish “creativity”, the Jewish mind is more manipulative, rather than creative.
@Franklin Ryckaert
There was a creativity subtest in the test battery of the gigantic Project Talent study from 1960. Jews scored about 101 on it, despite the subtest having a verbal format (it was basically 50% reading comprehension + word completion and 50% creative imagination).
I lament that we and the Jews can’t seem to get along, since we could enrich each other’s lives greatly, but when they prove themselves to be corrosive and subversive to Western civilization, then regardless of how creative and innocent they may be they have to go. And if they refuse to leave when asked, and also refuse to cease activities that the rest of society considers bad, and refuse to condemn such activities, then how innocent are they really? (As for little kids, their parents are primarily responsible for them.)
At some point, a group’s behavior can be bad enough that we can no longer afford to judge them as individuals. There is such a thing as two peoples being at war, and for 99% of human history (and in probably most non-Western countries even today) killing your enemies is simply what you do in war. Germany spent about six years trying to get them to leave, and tried to establish a place for them in Palestine. Then they spent another few years trying to segregate and deport them before finally deciding to kill them. That is more leniency from an enemy than you would get in most places.
“There is such a thing as two peoples being at war, and for 99% of human history …”
I imagine a spectrum or continuum from perfect amity to all-out war, and competition for ressources/influence between different ethnic groups within a state or empire is kind of in the middle of that. I think whites generally have the tendency to think of relations in an either-or way, because we find passive-aggressive ressource competition dishonorable. Low-trust peoples, on the other hand, do that sort of thing naturally, and therefore never achieve social harmony, not even within a family –
“I against my brother, I and my brother against our cousin, I, my brother and our cousin against the neighbors, All of us against the foreigner” [Bedouin proverb]
Most GERMAN Jews in the Kaiser’s Empire were secularized, assimiliated, loyal subjects of the Emperor and good citizens of the Second Reich. Many of them have done much contribution to the economy, science, technological development, etc. of Germany. Many were brave soldiers and fought in the Great War. Nationaldeutsche Jueden they were called. Kerry Bolton has written an interesting article about them. I think, the problem was with the so-called Eastern European Jews from Poland, Galizien, Russia, etc., which were subversive elements during the war, and especially which in masses came in Germany after the German defeat. In the Weimarer Republik they have got too much influence and they did much harm to both Germans and German Jews. Uncle Adolf should throw them out, but keep the national loyal German Jews instead. Maybe he threw so the baby out with the bathwater.
This reminds me of “It’s not the Jews, it’s the Zionists”-tier reductionism where everything negative about a group is blamed on a subset in order to fully exonerate the whole group of any wrongdoings. Five points of note:
One: It assumes that German Jews had more of a German than a Jewish identity, that they weren’t pro-Reich because they found that to be in their best interests at the time
Two: It assumes that German Jews would have sided with Germans against Eastern Jews, rather than the other way around
Three: The complaints about Eastern Jews after around 1890 are very similar to the complaints about German Jews a century before. Maybe the influence of Western society had civilized the latter?
Four: The Rothschilds were German Jews, and so were the Schiffs and the Warburgs i.e. the international bankers of the 19th and early 20th (-> FED) weren’t an Eastern European phenomenon!
Five: I think it was Hanna Arendt who wrote that, sometimes, Eastern Jewish immigrants were patsies/fall guys for better-connected, rich Western Jews who were actually pulling the strings
This comment displays a bravery from which our movement needs to learn.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.