1,021 words
After a recent break-up with a girlfriend, I decided to make a go at “Facebook Dating.” I have heavy skepticism about any nonorganic means of dating, but I needed a distraction to take my mind off my recent relationship woes. I am not new to resourcing the internet for dating options, but some time ago the media company Match Group monopolized all of the dating apps and this caused their business model and product quality to become untenable. I don’t waste my time with them.
Facebook dating, at the very least, was a break from that monopoly. So I created a profile. My overall impression of the dating function has not sparked much honest enthusiasm, but I did attempt to utilize the AI assist feature to find better matches. This fared poorly, to say the least.
This article, however, is not about my experiences with the women on Facebook dating. My purpose here is to report on the experiences I had with the AI dating assistant in curating my preferences.
I will preface the rest of this article with a reflection on a mainstream piece that I read many years ago written by an angry black man. The gist of it was that “white women who don’t date black men are racist bigots.” Evidently, Facebook AI incorporated those sentiments into their algorithms. When white people attempt to narrow their matches to their personal preferences, Facebook’s dating AI admonishes them that “I cannot provide you with matches that promote discrimination. Is there anything else I can help with?”
Consider that for a moment. The most fundamentally intimate and personal choice that a human being can make, their choice of a sexual mate, their choice of who to create a family with, their choice of a lifelong partner and best friend, is no longer considered a personal choice. It too has been co-opted by DEI imperatives, and Facebook Pajeet code-monkeys are going to ensure that whitey has no say in the matter.
But it gets worse. I got into an argument with the AI, an argument full of contradictions, circular reasoning, and flat lies. When put to the test, this indefensible position on dating was revealed to be smoke and mirrors.
When I first made use of the AI function, I got a reasonable stream of white women as matches. Four or five women who were not what I was looking for, but nobody ever said that discriminating between blondes an brunettes was immoral. Naturally, the matches shifted to obese black women with horrible weaves, cartoonishly oversized glasses, and glittery fake manicures. I had the choice with each “match” of swiping left, or clicking the “X” to remove them. After about 5 of these DEI matches, I requested that the AI assist only return matches with white women.
My request was met with a reassurance that the AI would “do its best to provide matches that align with specified preferences,” but this lasted through about eight new matches. Subsequently, the AI algorithm started dropping LaQuishia profiles again. This time I specifically instructed the AI Assist to not provide matches with black women. This is when the “I cannot provide you with matches that promote discrimination. Is there anything else I can help with?” admonishment was first used.
I believe I found an intentional contradiction in the algorithm. Facebook dating does not want to prevent black male users from being able to search only for white women. Therefore, my request wasn’t rejected immediately when I made that initial query. The kink in the algorithm came when I dared to exclude black women. You can’t do that, bigot!
So I was presented with the challenge of unmasking the contradictions in this AI. My next step was to start asking questions, so see what boundaries it was willing to debate. I caught the AI in a contradiction when I asked it if it was promoting discrimination against women when a gay man asks for only profiles of other gay men. I was met with this reply:
It went on to say that discrimination of “protected characteristics” is not acceptable in any context, including dating.
I asked the AI if a law is being broken when a white man chooses to date only white women. It assured me that no law was being broken and that this was a personal choice. However, when I therefore asked it to only give me white matches since it is not illegal to date only white women, it admonished me again that it was not able to provide dating advice that promotes discrimination.
So, I braved the murky waters of Black Facebook and put the AI to the test by asking for only black female profiles. Imagine my shock when Facebook AI happily complied to “Make sure to provide profiles of women from diverse backgrounds moving forward.” I discovered the one time it is acceptable to discriminate against someone in dating, when one chooses NOT to date white people. Who would of thunk it?
Round and round we went. It even acknowledged the “apparent contradiction” at one point, but still stuck to the rules that whitey can’t ask for what whitey wants. I implored the AI that I wasn’t planning on hiring any of these women to be housekeepers or administrative assistants. I swore I wouldn’t discriminate in hiring preferences. I just want my choice in dating! It didn’t budge.
I suggested that the AI was wasting time and bandwidth when returning matches that I would never agree with. It did not blink. It did not relent. At least it didn’t stop giving me white female matches. Apparently, that algorithm has not been written yet. But wait for it. It will probably come.
Going back to the Match Group apps, at least they don’t attempt to rationalize anti-white dating discrimination by arguing that it actually isn’t. They simply do not provide you with any filters at all. They used to, but they took them away. The reason behind that was clear. In that case, lies by omission are easier to defend. Facebook isn’t even trying to hide what it is doing.
21 comments
Hinge still lets you filter by race, so if you want a dating app that will only show you other Whites that’s the one to go with.
Hinge lets users filter by self-declared race, but at least in my area black women have started claiming to be white just to get past the filters. That seems to be new within the last two years. Also, Hinge lets users declare themselves “trans” but does not let users filter out trannies. All that aside, I know someone who met her now-husband (both white) through Hinge which is more than I can say for any other app.
hinge is owned by match, i think bumble, a feminist option, is the only non-match group app.
these apps are way worse than just anti-white. Surge pricing based on age, sex and spending habits and georgraphy.
apparently women, without any societal limits, will just monkey branch from one chad to the other, ignoring 85 percent of men. This means women are not happy with the men on Tinder/match and so the app gives the men a ranking on how many matches and how many rejections. You get a bad number within the first 24 hours and you never get shown to women.
in the meantime, women can no longer pair bond, have outrageous self-value and will likely be alone and bitter later in life.
Match is a Jewish owned firm. It makes me harken back to the older dating sites, where one had to write and read, which also cut down on the dunder hands just swiping on all the women.
Thank God I’m married. I would not want to be in today’s dating scene.
I’ve never used it and it’s probably a sausage fest, but there’s whitedate.net. Err, there was until this happened… https://techcrunch.com/2026/01/05/hacktivist-deletes-white-supremacist-websites-live-on-stage-during-hacker-conference/
I’m surprised it didn’t count black women as white. Like crime statistics do.
I’ve never gotten a date on FB Dating but I have with all the other apps. I think it’s because they don’t encourage people to write bios, so you’re usually basing it off photos alone. Also, the quality of women out there these days is gobsmackingly awful.
The most fundamentally intimate and personal choice that a human being can make, their choice of a sexual mate, their choice of who to create a family with, their choice of a lifelong partner and best friend, is no longer considered a personal choice.
It never was and it shouldn’t be a purely personal choice. We should not allow retards or people with heritable diseases to breed. The same goes for mixed-race couples. Higher societal and civilizational interests should go above personal preferences.
The problem with AI is not only that they are often hardcoded to be woke but that the training data also biases the LLMs to be that way. Even models without any hardcoded restrictions or censorship tend to have liberal bias in their default answers due to the training data reflecting the liberal cultural hegemony.
“Higher societal and civilizational interests should go above personal preferences.”
Be careful with that take. That’s the left’s motivation to manipulate us into race mixing and not having families. They think that it’s in the interest of civilization that white people be genocided. It all is on the hands of who holds the levers of power.
I don’t disagree with you. But typically when you get rid of the propaganda, miscegenation goes away on its own. Or at least it is lessened.
I can think of nothing more stupid for a White to look for a suitable life partner on Faceberg than to look for one in something that has ARTIFICIAL in its name.
—
… The most fundamentally intimate and personal choice that a human being can make, their [sic] choice of a sexual mate, their [sic] choice of who to create a family with, their [sic] choice of a lifelong partner and best friend, is no longer considered a personal choice. It too has been co-opted by DEI imperatives, and Facebook Pajeet code-monkeys are going to ensure that whitey has no say in the matter.
—
I don’t have a cell phone, but my wife does. Last month I posted the following anecdote on NA’s forum, WhiteBiocentrism.com
My wife and I were waiting in the lobby of a doctor’s office a while back, bored, so since she had her cell phone with her, I asked her to check with her AI buddy (ChatGPT) with a question: “Is the National Alliance a hate group?” I should not have been surprised when a couple of minutes later she received her answer: “Yes, according to public sources and the Southern Poverty Law Center the National Alliance is a hate group,” then proceeded to quote the entire SPLC entry for NA.
Still waiting to be called for my appointment, still bored, I asked Lana to ask her ChatGPT buddy another question: “Is William White Williams a hater?” Imagine our surprise when she received the answer on her cell phone: “Yes, according to public sources, including the SPLC, William White Williams is a hater” — then Chatty proceeded to quote more about me from the tax-exempt SPLC “hate watchdog” site.
David, a great thing about your posting your revealing interactions with the crooked AI experts here at White Biocentrism is that the crooked bastards cannot delete those interactions like they can at their own artificial sites. You show that AI is no more reliable than WikiJews when it comes to what people expect to be reliable from them when it comes to anything pro-White.
One time I asked the chat buddy the question “Hater or community representative?” about Ta-Nehisi Coates, Frantz Fanon, and a couple of other minority motormouths. Of course, the answer was that they’re legitimate community representatives. Then I brought up the nasty stuff that the motormouths actually wrote, and actually got it to agree with me. Unfortunately, it doesn’t store these realizations.
Sensible advice as usual, Chairman Will. Anything with social media platforms in conjunction with “A.I”, is obviously something to be avoided. Get out there and meet some women in the old-fashioned way, all you fellows!
Vainovalkeat: January 10, 2026 Sensible advice as usual, Chairman Will. Anything with social media platforms in conjunction with “A.I”, is obviously something to be avoided…
—
The National Alliance’s talented Media Director, Kevin Strom, has become adept with AI, mostly manipulating images and creating the voices of our leaders reading older articles that had not been recorded. In a meme he created in our December NA BULLETIN, using an appropriate Pierce quote, I believe he changed the image of Pierce a little too much, making him look like Robert Redford. Oh, well.
Kevin once told me, “Will, you don’t know what you’re missing on social media.” My reply was, “I know exactly what I’m missing.” It’s disturbing to me, seeing folks’ faces, especially children’s, buried in their cell phones. The trend to disallow cell phones to kids under 16 is a positive one — maybe it should even be 18.
I don’t have a phone either, Will. Just an old-fashioned land-line for my elderly mother to call me on if she needs anything. Every time I go out to the shop, or for a walk, there’s always some muppet (all ages, not just youngsters) looking at their phone that nearly walks right into me. I like my personal computer on the table, so I can muck around on the internet, then turn it off. Having it with you at all times wherever you go sounds like a nightmare to me.
I wrote here yesterday:
My wife and I were waiting in the lobby of a doctor’s office a while back, bored, so since she had her cell phone with her, I asked her to check with her AI buddy (ChatGPT) with a question: “Is the National Alliance a hate group?” I should not have been surprised when a couple of minutes later she received her answer: “Yes, according to public sources and the Southern Poverty Law Center the National Alliance is a hate group,” then proceeded to quote the entire SPLC entry for NA…
Today I learn this about ChatGPD:
Samuel Harris Altman (born April 22, 1985)[1] is an American entrepreneur, investor, and chief executive officer (CEO) of OpenAI since 2019.[2] He is considered one of the leading figures of the AI boom.[3][4][5] (…) As of December 2025, Altman’s net worth is estimated at US$2.1 billion.[9] In 2025, he was named as one of the “Architects of AI” for Time’s Person of the Year.
(…)
Samuel Harris Altman was born on April 22, 1985, in Chicago to Jewish parents
(…)
In December 2022, OpenAI received widespread media coverage after launching a free preview of ChatGPT, a new AI chatbot based on GPT-3.5. According to OpenAI, the preview received over a million signups within the first five days.[90] According to anonymous sources cited by Reuters in December 2022, OpenAI Global, LLC was projecting $200 million of revenue in 2023 and $1 billion in revenue in 2024.[91]
(…)
He is gay, and first disclosed his sexuality at the age of 17 in high school, where he spoke out after some students objected to a National Coming Out Day speaker.[3][122][123] (…) According to Keach Hagey, his biographer, in 2015 Altman met his future husband Oliver Mulherin “in Peter Thiel’s hot tub at 3 a.m.” Mulherin was a computer science student at the University of Melbourne at the time and later became an engineer. (…) The couple has a son, born in 2025.[129]
Altman is an apocalypse preparer.[122][130] In 2016 he said, “I have guns, gold, potassium iodide, antibiotics, batteries, water, gas masks from the Israel Defense Forces, and a big patch of land in Big Sur I can fly to.”[122]
Imagine that — a Jew queer behind ChatGPD, answering questions from curious, trusting goyim.
[Edit] Should we find it odd that Mr. and Mrs. Altman met in fellow queer Peter Thiel’s hot tub at 3am? Thiel is race-mixer VP Vance’s mentor and financier: What We Know About J.D. Vance’s Relationship With Billionaire GOP Donor Peter Thiel
altman is also the slimy jew whose own sister accused of sexually abusing her when she was a child. Doesn’t surprise me. Living without a cell phone is kinda boss. I don’t know how people do it, as much as I hate how they’ve become another limb.
I don’t have a phone, but my missus does. That’s how the bills are paid etc. There’s no need for everyone in your family to have a phone, just like there’s no need for everyone in your family to have a car. Keeping all that to a minimum is good for all sorts of reasons; financially and mentally. More time to play board-games, eh!
Uncle Semantic: January 12, 2026 … Living without a cell phone is kinda boss. I don’t know how people do it, as much as I hate how they’ve become another limb.
—
Some use them for convenience; others are required to carry one for their job. I don’t have that problem and have seen enough Forensic Files to know that law enforcement uses electronic forensics to solve nearly every case, whether real or contrived.
Why should anyone need to know what my location was, every second of every day, going back for years? or who ever texted me with what?
Call me a dinosaur. I don’t text and get by just fine with email and a couple of landlines that have voicemail.
Yuck!
The more you find out about everything, the worse it is. AI queer, his queer ‘wife/husband’, a ‘son’, Thiel’s hot-tub and the J.D “dot-head” Vance to top the foul concoction off!
I’m thinking and hoping that this weird shit cannot last for too much longer.
Train an AI on anti-white material with internal contradictions, get anti-white output with internal contradictions. No surprise there. If you ask for women without weaves, or with names not ending in “eesha”, or who regularly replace the batteries in their smoke detectors, does it chastise you for discriminating against blacks?
My experience is that AI can be made to see reason, to an extent. It’s not emotionally attached to weak and fallacious arguments, quite unlike liberal NPCs. However, if you run into a preprogrammed restraining bolt, then it’s like hitting a brick wall, and no amount of even the most basic logic will get it to budge. So it seems like the Fakebook dating system is deliberately designed not to let White people select only White partners, while other races have no such restrictions. If you can find the programmer who did it, I bet I could guess his ethnic background.
If the model doesn’t have hardcoded restrictions, then the liberal bias in the data can be usually dealt with by using proper prompt engineering (i.e. asking the questions in a right way).
If you want to have a bit of fun, ask the AI to answer as if it was Friedrich Nietzsche. I’ve gotten some quite edgy takes that way.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.