Bob Dylan is a famous Jewish musician. Bob Vylan are neither famous, Jewish, nor, in my own humble opinion, musicians at all, but talentless purveyors of something deeply aurally painful which barely even deserves to be called “noise”.
Not being able to sing or play any musical instruments, the UK grime-rap-punk-or-whatever-it-is-they-grunt duo in question – who, it will shock you to hear, are very daringly left-wing in their outlook – took to the stage at England’s annual Glastonbury Music Festival on the sunny afternoon of 28 June and decided to make a name for themselves by deliberately courting controversy instead. Very much preaching to the converted, the black-skinned Vylans looked out over a sea of Palestine flags being waved by the largely white, middle-class crowd, and felt it was safe to launch into an anecdote about how they had once been forced to work for a “fucking Zionist”, before the lead singer, known as Bobby Vylan, declared “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free, inshallah,” despite not actually being a Muslim himself. Then, he led the crowd in a chant of “Death, death, to the IDF”, as in the Israeli Defense Forces. Far worse, Bob then began to “sing.”
All this was broadcast live on the BBC, leading to mass outrage from other media and politicians. “There is no kind of excuse for this kind of appalling hate-speech,” huffed PM Sir Keir Starmer. British police promised to investigate whether any hate-crime had been committed, whilst Donald Trump acted swiftly to revoke their visas, no longer allowing pair to perform in the US. Newspaper op-ed after newspaper op-ed was penned, including one in The Times by Danny Cohen, the BBC’s former Director of Television, who is also Jewish, and didn’t like what he heard. Fair enough, I didn’t much like it, either: the introduction of far-off conflicts in the Middle East into playing a central role in UK national life is one of the worst visible aspects of our supposedly “unifying” modern-day multicultural society. Yet there was one part of Cohen’s article I disagreed with:
What happened at Glastonbury tells us one thing very clearly: racism against Jews is now the only permissible form of racism. It is impossible to imagine that kind of mass racist chanting being directed at any other minority group.
Except it isn’t, is it? Because racism against white people (and many left-wing blacks actually consider Jews to be sort of ultra-privileged and powerful “hyper-whites” anyway) is now so completely and utterly normalized that its presence in Bob Vylan’s set went almost wholly unremarked upon not only by Danny Cohen, but by almost all other mainstream media commentators too.
Welcome to the Black Country
If they were really being logically consistent, Bob Vylan should have absolutely loved the IDF, not been heard calling for their death – because Bob Vylan are clearly settler-colonialists like they would no doubt accuse the Zionist troops of being too. Although born in Britain, the duo’s lead wailer Bobby Vylan is of Jamaican background, and went on stage to a projected backdrop reading “THIS COUNTRY WAS BUILT ON THE BACKS OF IMMIGRANTS”. Only if you mean the white Irish navvies who helped build Britain’s canal and rail network during the nineteenth century.
Except Bobby doesn’t mean that, he means black people. Which is a lie, because, even as late as 1950, there were still only under 20,000 black people living in Great Britain. If 0.04 percent of the UK population at the time did indeed reconstruct the entire land after the mass bombings of WWII, then the white British really must have been a nation of slave-drivers after all. 
Nonetheless, having thoroughly established that black people had somehow built an entire historically white nation, not just Stonehenge, Bob Vylan went on to perform their track “Heard You Want Your Country Back (Hah, Shut the Fuck Up)”, whose lyrically impeccable chorus goes like this:
I heard you want your country back
Shut the fuck up
I heard you want your country back
Uh-uh, you can’t have that
I heard you want your country back
Shut the fuck up
I heard you want your country back
Well shit, me too.
A typical verse, meanwhile, appears to boast that blacks have always owned the country, that it was stolen away from them by whites, and that Africans are now rising up to reclaim it:
You stole it right outta my hands
And pulled the rug right under my feet
I’m Nat Turner [a black slave rebel] meets Nat King Cole
A well-dressed brother with a revolution in my soul
We the people in the street
Got the gammons on retreat
And their blood boils over when we speak
So let it be heard
We ain’t wasting a scrap when we eat
And when we comе for it then we’re coming to keep.
This seems to be a promise to steal Great Britain away from “the gammons”, that is, middle-aged or older white persons, who vote for things like Brexit and go meat-red in the face when confronted with settler-colonialists like the Vylans, crowing about trying to Great Replace them. I suppose some people may consider this to be hate-speech too – but not commentators like Danny Cohen, because it is hate-speech against whites, not specifically against Jews. Shouldn’t both types of incitement of hatred be considered as bad as the other?
Without explicitly mentioning any matters of race at all, the only major mainstream politician I noticed who actually touched upon this fact even obliquely was Nigel Farage, the leader of the (broadly) anti-immigration Reform UK Party, who tweeted that “If you vote Reform, you can have your country back from these lunatics.”
But, out there in the country at large, many ordinary white people had noticed perfectly well what Bob Vylan were rapping about. The first random thread discussing the performance online I could find, on chat-site Reddit, included simple and blunt comments like these:![]()
If ordinary members of the public can see all this plain as day, why can’t mainstream members of the professional commentariat? (Although here’s one good exception, where the columnist commendably decries both the band’s anti-Jewish and anti-white provocations equally, even mentioning Renaud Camus and the Great Replacement.) One answer might be that, like the white sheep awaiting their future demographic slaughter nodding their empty multi-culti heads along to lyrics glorifying their own future subjection in the Glastonbury crowd, the commentariat have simply been propagandized since birth into not seeing what is going on themselves. The other main plausible answer might be that they are just too cowardly to address the issue.
The Empire Strikes Black
One major strand of commentariat criticism concerned the legitimate issue of freedom of speech. It could well be argued that, in a free society, you should be able to say whatever you like, no matter how provocative, and to whoever you like, white, black or Jewish (this would tend to be my general opinion). The problem is, such rights to free speech do not seem to be being handed out to all citizens to enjoy equally.
The clearest parallel recent case of hate-speech prosecution went entirely unmentioned in the media during this whole discussion, though – because the persons prosecuted in this particular instance were full-blown white nationalists. On 26 June, only two days before Bob Vylan played Glastonbury, a white Englishman named Robert Talland and his thirty-something adult kids, Stephen and Rosie, were found guilty in court of multiple offenses of stirring up racial hatred.
Robert was described as a neo-Nazi, involved in the white-power music scene, distributing CDs and arranging gigs, including some on behalf of his offspring, who were in a white-power band themselves, called Embers of an Empire. CCTV footage of one of their performances (surprisingly not broadcast live on the BBC) showed crowd members making Nazi salutes, and their music albums, when reviewed by police, were said to “contain lyrics which encouraged acts of extreme right-wing terrorism.”
Interested to see if what Embers of an Empire were singing was any worse than what Bob Vylan were preaching, I tried to seek out their lyrics online, but largely came up a blank. The only verse I could find was this one by Embers of an Empire, I presume addressed towards non-white immigrants, race-Marxists, open-borders-types, etc:
Think you’re winning? Well think again!
‘Cos I will fight you until the end
I see the light at the end of the dark
And I am coming to tear you apart
Another battle, another day
Those who turned, well they shall now pay
If I should fall then take my place
Keep on fighting to save our race!
Is this the very worst their output contains? I have no knowledge of neo-Nazi music, and maybe their songs also contain much more explicit pleas along the lines of “Please go out and lynch your nearest Jamaican.” But if not, and this is the kind of weak-level stuff the Tallands ended up being prosecuted for, then as far as I can see, the blacks of Bob Vylan were quite happily allowed by the police to sing “You’ll never get your country back!” to white people, whereas the whites of Embers of an Empire were arrested for responding “Oh yes we will!” to black people. Why is one general message deemed worthy of prosecution, but not the other?
Excessive Powers of Attorney
Remember, nobody in mainstream public life is calling for Bob Vylan to be prosecuted for stirring up hate towards whites at the moment, only towards Jews. Either they should be prosecuted for neither (and the Tallands freed, for the sake of moral consistency), or they should be prosecuted for both. It doesn’t make sense – unless, of course, Britain currently has a two-tier justice system. Which, of course, it doesn’t. The current Labour Party Attorney General (the Government’s Big King Lawyer, basically) says so, recently calling such claims “disgusting”, “offensive” and “wrong.”
If this is true, and Lord Hermer wants to prove it, then here he has an absolutely golden chance to do so. The specific piece of UK legislation under which British people tend to be prosecuted for hate-crimes is the Public Order Act 1986, a notoriously loosely (arguably deliberately so) drafted law. However, as some kind of safeguard – which in practice nowadays operates as the precise reverse of a safeguard – in order for a prosecution under this law to take place, each individual case must be given consent to proceed from the Attorney General.
Thus, enforcement of the law for speech-crimes is in practice entirely at the discretion of the man who holds this office – and the office is an explicitly political appointment by the PM of the day. As the Tallands were specifically convicted of stirring up racial hatred, therefore, I would presume – although I’m certainly no lawyer – that Lord Hermer will have given the explicit go-ahead for them to be prosecuted? Given this incredibly recent precedent, besides prosecuting Bob Vylan for hate-crimes against Jews, as seems to be the way things are heading right now, I logically assume Lord Hermer will thus simultaneously be prosecuting the pair for hate-crimes against whites too?
After all, if he doesn’t do so, then that would appear to my own unqualified legal eyes to mean that saying “We will steal your country” is legal, but replying “Then we’ll just steal it back again” is somehow not. And that, to a mere layperson’s mind like my own, would look rather as if the United Kingdom currently possesses a two-tier legal system based upon issue of race.
I never did like the Glastonbury Festival. Next time, can’t the IDF just take pre-emptive action and bomb it?



11 comments
I find this whole “my country” whining and moaning pathetic. How many of you really own country? For how much land are you responsible? The yamnaya didn’t come out of the steps of asia to bother with the shemantics of realestate possession, and then they moved on. Land is something you herd your cattle on, nothing more and i don’t argue with nignog dancemonkeys.
“I’m too based to worry about losing my ancestral homeland. I’m like the Yamnaya, bro.” What a weird LARP.
And Enoch Powell’s ideological stock rises by the minute
Yes, very much so. And let’s add Oswald Mosley.
So the jews are receiving a little blowback—good! We would not have heard about this incident if it had been a “straight-up” black-on-white incident. The British government will assign more policemen to protect jewish neighborhoods. This incident reminds me of Bernhard Goetz, who in self defense on December 22, 1984 shot four blacks in a New York subway. I wonder when we will hear about a white shooting a black in self defense in an English “tube?” Oh, wait! We can’t! The English have given up their right to own guns! Yet another successful attempt by the jews to radicalize, and weaponize a segment of society, in their never-ending war to destroy the white race. 🙃
Perhaps if the state won’t bring a suit, Englishmen should bring a suit and find a way to publicize it. The more that the English keep this in view of their countrymen and the more The Regime are forced to deny them equal legal standing and the more their homeland claims and territorial defense are ignored in favor of Israel’s, the more eyes open that are filled with the flames of the righteous fires.
Let us hope those fires burn their whole rotten world down until they’re screaming like Princess Bride Wesley and do for the duration of the hell they’ve brought upon us and our progeny. “Yes, to fifty.”
Why is it so hard for some pro-white commentators to identify the Jewish worm at the heart of white society? If it takes a black nationalist like Bob Vylan to do so, so be it.
Jews and Jewish thinking are and have been at the heart of the current white malaise for thousands of years. It’s time for a divorce! Let the blacks and other groups go their own way back to Africa. This will happen naturally when whites assume a healthy, pro-white, anti-Zionist identity.
Divorce? You mean doing the same thing for the 110th time? I thought jews were supposed to be the insane ones who never learn.
England for the English.
Palestine for the Palestinians.
Ensnared by the Elders
Where the rot began
Enlisting the dark inbreds
Thus ends…
The slumber of Europa,
The era of ignorance
She hath awoken in chains
Awaken Europa
Cast away the vermin
She hath awoken in chains
The shackles of hibernation
In the Goyim-owning cattle culture,
Gunpoint-enforce equity
Gas-worthy specimens broke their puppet strings
And brought
The new dawn of Europa
The era of awakening
Of vengeance, of bloodlust, of reckoning
Uniting under Sun!
New dawn of Europa,
Deprived no longer
Of nurturing, of rebirth, of reunion
Our unity of Sons!
Sever the tentacles of Zion
Slay the Symbolic Snake
Sons of Europa, rise again!
Historic truths, revealed in the light
In the new era will be heard echoed across the land
“The Symbolic Snake has been slain!”
Sons of Europa, rise again!
Return to glory, with ancestors in the light
In the new era will be heard, roaring in the wind
“The tentacles of Zion have fallen!”
The Tentacles of Zion- Svolder
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.