The Union Jackal
March 2025

2,103 words

Toxicity Report

The semiotics of anti-white racism has already been around so long it has become pervasively familiar. Take the BBC’s coverage of Finland, as the skinny Scandinavian country was recently voted the world’s happiest country for the eighth year in succession. I’ve been to Finland, and that is one white country. 

With the few drops of Irish and Cornish blood swilling around my bloodline, I felt positively swarthy. The photo used by the BBC to illustrate the story, however, seems to tell a different story. Finland is, apparently, at least 50% black. How times change.

The British have become used to blacks dominating advertising – always in a good, wise, or positive role – and it is no longer news that some white historical figure is to be portrayed as black in whatever new drama the BBC are pushing. So, when the latest Netflix series featured blatant race swapping en route from the real world to a dramatic reconstruction, the UK could be forgiven for stifling a yawn. But, as with all good drama, there is a twist in the tale.

Adolescence is a recent, three-part series based on actual events in which a teenage black boy stabbed a black girl to death. By the time this dramatic adaptation hit the small screen, however, there had been one minor alteration to history in terms of casting. The boy was white. Although the state struggles to keep the facts and figures away from the public eye, and as in America, black knife crime in the UK far outstrips its white equivalent per capita. So, although the writers were inspired by an actual killing of a girl by a black boy, it was a 13-year-old, slightly effeminate white kid who portrayed the perpetrator of the crime in Adolescence.

His motivation, or at least the causal factors behind this childish femicide, had also been subtly tampered with. With his father often absent, the boy was shown as lacking a strong, male, parental role model. This, of course, is another social truth which dare not speak its name in the UK concerning black men who are also “fathers”. But in the whitewashed Netflix version, the father’s absence is due to his working long hours to support his family, not generally recognized to be a commonality in the black community. Also, whereas black knife crime is the effect of which black cultural dysfunction is the cause, there is another factor at play in Adolescence which causes the tragedy, and it is another of our old friends: toxic masculinity. We’ll return to this after a brief word from some of the sponsors of anti-whiteness.

The Spectator magazine’s YouTube channel ran a 20-minute interview on Adolescence which exemplifies the limp response of the British, middle-class, vaguely right-of-center media to the problem of black culture. In the talk, two members of the metropolitan elite – who also create most if not all of British television drama – were critical of the warm response of the leftist press to the drama. They blamed… the metropolitan elite. The two men, the TV critic and an associate editor of The Spectator, skirted around the issue of blackness almost entirely. They quickly noted the race swapping of the child murderer from the real boy who committed the actual crime the series was based on, and when it came to the lack of a male parental role model in the lives of many children, seemed just to assume this was a multicultural problem, and not one endemic to black culture, which it patently obviously is. These are white people colluding in anti-whiteness.

Prime Minister Starmer, who never sees an anti-white male bandwagon he doesn’t want to hop aboard, had one of his stooges lob him a softball question in Parliament and ask him about the program. He told her he would be watching it at home that very evening with his two children, aged 14 and 16 (the show has a 17 rating) and described it as a “documentary” before correcting himself. You don’t need much working knowledge of Freud’s theory of parapraxis (aka the “Freudian slip”) to understand that a documentary is what he views Adolescence as. He also suggested that the drama be shown in UK schools. Folk are getting bored with the same old diet of white racism, and we need some toxic masculinity – particularly spread online – to spice things up.

“Toxic masculinity” always refers to white men. In a recent set of advertisements attempting to instruct young men not to harass women with unwanted attention, in each case the sex pest is chalk-white, the voice of his conscience and savior of the stressed woman black or Asian, the exact mirror of reality. Toxic masculinity, you see, is a white phenomenon, and simply refers to white masculinity. That would be the type of masculinity which created Western civilization, won two World Wars, birthed the classical world, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, the scientific revolution, the internet, philosophy, literature, art, music and anything else you care to name which is worthwhile in history. Black culture, as we know (and they know but could never admit) is a hothouse of “toxic masculinity”, testosterone-soaked as it is, solipsistic, aggressive, reeking with the rank stench of hatred for whites they know are superior. But black culture is sacrosanct despite having little to show for it. In world-historical terms – and excuse the masculine toxicity of my language – blacks haven’t done shit.

It is Andrew Tate who takes most of the flak from those chattering, fey commentators who are clutching their pearls over toxic masculinity. Tate is the cartoonish pimp who has made a career for himself by being a man’s man (although I have rarely seen anyone so gay-looking), and his influence has been deemed the causal factor behind this entirely illusory phenomenon. White boys apparently can’t get enough of this vulgar baldie. So it’s curious that, when race-grifters HOPE not Hate conducted a survey among British schoolboys a couple of years ago, and asked them who liked Andrew Tate, 61% of those who answered in the positive were Muslim.

Racism in a Cold Climate

Any country’s embassy, although physically situated in another country, is still that nation’s territory. This is why people seek political asylum there. Julian Assange, for example, could not be arrested while he stayed in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London because he was, in terms of his legal status, in Ecuador. Although what we might call the “embassy principle” does not apply to scientific outposts, one cannot help but think that British research stations in Antarctica somehow have something of the mother country in them. Well, now they have a bit more.

The British Antarctic Survey (BAS) is a body which regulates and oversees British teams working in these chilly climes, and has just issued guidelines to staff at the various outposts for which it is responsible. What do these guidelines suggest? Dress up warm? No snowballing? Don’t eat yellow snow? None of the above.

Instead, the new BAS directives deal with what it calls “the myth of meritocracy”. The guidelines – which in the context of race always means “orders” – states that believing that the most qualified person should get the job can be a form of racial harassment, using the phrase “all lives matter” is a microaggression, and that white BAS employees must be aware of their “privilege and power”. If nothing else, this shows that no matter how far you travel on this earth, you can’t escape DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion).

Believing in meritocracy implies, apparently, that black people don’t work hard enough, and that to use any of phrases connected with it implies that “people of colour are lazy and/or incompetent and need to work harder” or that “people of colour are given extra unfair benefits due to their race”. In my own experience – with a couple of notable exceptions concerning blacks who acted white in the workplace – if you are working with blacks it always means that you will need to work that bit harder to take up the slack. That may sound like lazy racism – and I prefer the other sort, energetic racism – but I suspect many whites have experienced the same lassitude in black co-workers they have been forced to prop up in the workplace, particularly when it comes to manual labor. We recall the novel idea that punctuality is a white trait, and therefore putting too much store by it is detrimental to blacks. This is why your black colleague can breeze in half an hour late for work but you can’t.

We are all familiar with the cat’s cradle of DEI and all its works, but one can’t help wondering what blacks themselves make of all this. If you were black and knew perfectly well that you had just been preferred for a position over a white person you knew to be superior in aptitude to you, would you not feel a sense of shame at this absurd state of affairs? Not really, no more than drug cheats in sport feel guilt about beating their drug-free opponents. For that you would need shame, and blacks have only pride, as misplaced and artificially inflated as it may be.

White Privilege Strikes Again

Watching the British media who are not leftist shills (a small parish) gradually realizing that the main purpose of the British government is to harass and persecute heterosexual white men is both informative and tragic. The latest example of what ex-Reform MP Rupert Lowe openly calls “anti-white racism” concerns prison sentencing guidelines used by judges when considering whether a person convicted of a crime merits a custodial sentence.

Sentencing guidelines are set and monitored, appropriately enough, by the Sentencing Council, and the very first line of its definition is as follows: “Sentencing guidelines help make sure that judges and magistrates in courts across England and Wales take a consistent approach to sentencing.”

So far, so equitable. Some people, however, are now more equal than others. A PSR, or Pre-Sentence Report, is prepared for anyone not automatically incarcerated for their crimes, and can mitigate and therefore mean that the convicted criminal may not necessarily go to jail. This is designed to safeguard pregnant women, those who may be carers for dependent relatives, young offenders, and a range of protected classes. Again, this all seems like the fabled equality in the eyes of the law. A new amendment to these judicial guidelines, however, somewhat extends the range of so-called protected classes: “A PSR will normally be considered necessary if the offender belongs to… an ethnic minority, cultural minority, and/or faith minority community”.

You don’t need to be a legal eagle to spot what this means. It means a white man committing crime X (where X is an imprisonable offence) will have no PSR, whereas a criminal from this new class will. This new and binding rule comes into effect on April Fool’s Day.

The state played another very smart card in this latest example of creeping bias against whiteness. The Justice Secretary is said to be “displeased” at this turn of judicial events, and is probably some crusty old white judge who went to public school. Not so. The Justice Secretary is a woman named Shabana Mahmood. Good old Muslims, fighting to help us beleaguered kufr as we tremble in the dock. She is said to be frustrated that the guidelines are binding, and that she can do nothing to reverse this jail-whitey clause. Sure.

No further questions, M’lud.

Quiz Time!

Finally, to relieve the tide of sludge coming out of the (dis)United Kingdom, let’s end with a fun deportation quiz! Which of the following have I invented?

1. An Iranian sex offender avoided deportation on the grounds that drink and drug use had given him a distrust of authority. He was understandably worried that on his forced return to Iran (by all accounts a bit on the authoritarian side), he might have a bit of a hard time with the mullahs.
2. An African man avoided getting on de big metal bird back to Wakanda because he was worried that his crimes would lead his fellow countrymen in Nigeria to believe him to have been possessed.
3. An Albanian criminal – hardly as rare as hen’s teeth – was spared expulsion as his son doesn’t like the tase of chicken nuggets anywhere else other than Britain.

Did you spot the fake? Ha! Trick question! They are all true, and the stories can be found here, here, and here.

Land of hope and glory! Well, hope.
The Union Jackal.