The Israeli military is poised to undertake ground operations in Gaza at any moment. At least that’s what is being touted by almost every Israel-friendly media outlet in the world. I have a feeling that even though Israel is technologically superior to Hamas’ irregular fighters, it’s not going to go particularly well for the Jews. Sure, they’ve been softening up the Gaza Strip with their self-propelled artillery bombardments, guided missile strikes, and white phosphorous airbursts for the last two weeks, but it’s still going to be a slugfest if the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) decide to drive their fancy Merkava main battle tanks into Fortress Gaza.
Every time a technologically superior enemy with significant maneuverability gets bogged down in urban warfare, it turns into a real quagmire. When maneuverability is lost and it comes down to slogging through a city street by street and house by house, technological superiority doesn’t amount to much. That’s something the Jews aren’t going to tolerate for long. There is speculation that the Israelis are getting cold feet about their touted ground offensive; when their soldiers start coming back in body bags, Israeli public support for the invasion will take a nosedive off the Golan Heights. And it’s not just the prospect of casualties, either. One commentator on Substack suggests that the Israelis have been surprised by the global outcry in response to their bombardment of Gaza and that there have been internal disagreements within the IDF about how to proceed.
As of this writing, The Hill reports that approximately 199 people are being held captive in Gaza. I have no idea whether that is true or if it is an inflated number. Whatever the case, there’s no doubt that some balaclava-clad irregular fighters have a number of hostages in their hands.
It is no surprise that Israel has a lengthy kill list of people it wants to bury before they retreat from their ethnic cleansing invasion. The Telegraph reports that first on the list is Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza. Speaking on behalf of the IDF, Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari said that “Yahya Sinwar is the commander of the campaign, and he is a dead man.” The article features some maps that depict potential Israeli ground attack plans as well. It then goes on to feature other prominent Palestinians who are on their kill list.
As I was writing this, the Israelis decided to drop a gigantic bomb on a hospital in the Gaza Strip. The news cycle has just exploded, literally and figuratively, once again. The Jews blamed a Hamas rocket misfire (not likely). Conversely, the Palestinians and their allies blamed the Israeli air force (most likely). It’s next to impossible to keep up with the veritable avalanche of news stories piling up about the conflict as things spiral out of control.
I honestly do feel sorry for innocent Palestinians being forcibly evicted from their hyper-dense ghetto high-rises by Israeli high explosive shells, Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs), and white phosphorous incendiaries. This is beside the fact that Israel turned off Gaza’s water and power supplies and cut off all food shipments. According to the World Food Programme, even in peacetime “more than 60% of Gaza’s population faces food insecurity.” I also feel sorry for the Jews who are being subjected to genuine acts of barbarity, the same rapine acts of viciousness we see Muslims perpetrate on the women and children of the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, and the rest of Europe.
Unfortunately, as Greg Johnson has pointed out, the fighting between these two bitter rivals will solve nothing: “The reason both sides target civilians is that their goal is ethnic cleansing through terror: Jews want Palestinian land, and Palestinians want Jewish land.” The real question about this whole conflagration is therefore, “What is good for white people?” No matter the issues at stake, Jews always ask “Is this good for Jews?” Going forward, we must always view international events such as these in terms of our own interests: How can we leverage the situation to suit our needs? Is our involvement in conflicts overseas in the interests of white people? How can we use circumstances to bolster our position domestically? We must always keep in mind that changing the culture through metapolitical agitation and awakening the white racial consciousness is our foremost priority.
A plague on both your houses. I am not a fan of Muslims or Jews acting like rapacious ethnic mafias in my country or in the wider West. I think the best way to leverage the current conflict is to draw attention to the disruptions that non-white diasporas cause in our countries when our borders and immigration policies are completely open. Everything would be much better if both the Palestinians and the Jews had homelands of their own. The Jews in Israel have that, but the Palestinians do not. I don’t consider a densely-packed ghetto kept under apartheid a homeland.
Ever since Hamas decided to transform themselves into an army of Super Dave Osborne clones on paragliders, the entire world has been transfixed by this genocidal war. This is thanks in large part to the enormity of Jewish media power to dehumanize Palestinians even further on every controlled legacy media outlet. The zero tolerance policy that Israel has for supporters of Hamas is predictably being pushed in the Western media as well.
As readers of Counter-Currents and The Occidental Observer well know, the near-total control of Western media by Jews or those sympathetic to or controlled by Jews is the reason for this. Even just a cursory glance at the headlines these days reveals an absolute pro-Israeli bias. Moreover, since our homelands have been transformed into multicultural hellscapes thanks to mass migration, every time the Middle East sneezes we get societal Ebola. The following recent news items are indicative of just some of the fallout that we are seeing in our own countries.
A man in the United States was arrested on hate crime charges for stabbing a Muslim boy. It takes a lunatic to attack a defenseless child, but that being said, the widespread, ubiquitous dehumanization campaign being waged by Jewish-controlled media outlets lead to incidents such as this. In another story, Aine Davis, a British national and convert to Islam who had been arrested at Luton Airport last year and charged with being an ISIS terrorist, pleaded guilty to the charges in court this week. I do not want to live alongside Muslims or Jews, but violence against them is not going to solve anything. Metapolitics is the solution.
Protests around the Western world sparked by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are an unnerving reminder of how our countries have been invaded as a result of mass immigration policies. These policies have been pushed relentlessly by Jewish interest groups since the end of the Second World War. Kevin MacDonald’s pioneering work on Jews and their relentless pursuit of their group interests, including advocating for open-borders policies in white-majority countries, is key to understanding the current state of our historic homelands. Jews, who are a paranoid group at the best of times, do not feel comfortable living amongst white gentiles, hence their incessant lobbying to open our countries to foreigners. Jews feel that it is in their group’s interest to reside in a multicultural state where they can pursue their group evolutionary strategy in countries where the white majority’s power has been attenuated by the presence of multiple competing ethnic groups.
In the United States, protests on university campuses and in the streets of major cities saw clashes between rival groups on either side of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
On a positive note, an Israeli billionaire and his wife decided to step down from Harvard’s Board of Directors in protest against a Harvard student association’s condemnation of Israel’s response to Hamas’ attack. It is always good when Jews release their stranglehold on academia even a little bit. Meanwhile, a Black History professor at Cornell University called Hamas’ attack on Jews “exhilarating” and “energizing.” And on Wednesday, October 18 in Washington, DC, a Jewish American group calling for a ceasefire in Gaza organized a protest that occupied the rotunda of the Cannon House office building on Capitol Hill, which resulted in a number of arrests.
In Canada, surprisingly large rallies were held in support of both Israel and Palestine on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, as well as at universities across the country. Other cities, including Edmonton, Montreal, and Toronto, saw numerous demonstrations as people hit the streets to show their support for one of the sides.
In Germany, there is little incentive for migrants to work given that Left-wing parties continue to increase financial and other benefits in support of mostly Muslim newcomers. The city of Hamburg, for example, is spending an unsustainable fortune every month to keep immigrants on welfare. Remix News reports that Hamburg alone is looking to increase its budget to support the foreign army of rapacious migrants in its midst:
The budget committee for the city is now looking to increase its funding for the reception of migrants by €212.8 million, after having already raised it by €118.7 million earlier this year. Now, with the latest increase, the total amount of money for housing and caring for migrants in 2023 will total €1 billion.
The article goes on to say that the €1 billion figure does not even include day care, schooling, and health care. Understandably, the Hamburg municipal officials are looking to the federal government for more funding. The cost to the federal government for the housing and care of migrants is approximately €36 billion and climbing. To offset this, support for the Right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD) is on the rise, and according to a new poll, a majority of Germans have turned against mass immigration and all of its associated problems. The current crisis in the Levant will undoubtedly exacerbate the situation as Palestinians and other groups are displaced and then invariably find their way to Europe.
As Greg Johnson has pointed out, one of the key problems with multicultural societies is that there is no common good in them. When there are many competing racial and ethnic groups with divergent interests occupying the same territory, it is impossible to negotiate the convoluted landscape. Overseas conflicts therefore exacerbate pre-existing conflicts. Foreign wars that were at one time none of our concern are now being waged by proxy in the streets of our major cities.
The stories about ethnic cleansing in Palestine and Israel are being blared from every television, every computer screen, every smartphone, every radio, and every legacy media newspaper at present are reminiscent of what is happening to white people. Many Western countries are in a tumultuous state because we, too, are being ethnically cleansed in our historic homelands by a hostile, Jewish-controlled elite that uses mass migration and relentless propaganda as weapons.
One way to leverage the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict for white interests is to mimic, to some degree, Israel’s actions. We could say, “You’re right, we have to take this opportunity to rid our countries of our unwanted Muslim populations by way of mass deportations.” Is this a complete solution? No, but it would be a good start. Once more nationalist elements eventually take hold of the reins of power in our beleaguered countries, it won’t be much of a stretch to suggest that diaspora Jews return to Israel for their own safety and protection.
The most important aspect in all this from a White Nationalist perspective is: “What is good for white people?” We can ask this question and we can provide our own answers. Multiculturalism does not work, because every time something happens overseas, the unwelcome, ungrateful foreigners in our midst run amok and our toady politicians bend over backwards to placate them. It’s time to close our borders, deport all non-whites from our homelands, stay out of foreign wars that are not our concern, and look out for ourselves once again.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
Related
-
Whither Thou Goest, Diaspora?
-
Nowej Prawicy przeciw Starej Prawicy Rozdział 2: Hegemonia
-
Nowej Prawicy przeciw Starej Prawicy, Rozdział 1: Nowa Prawica przeciw Starej Prawicy
-
Will There Be an Optics War II?
-
Nowej Prawicy przeciw Starej Prawicy: Wprowadzenie
-
Nowej Prawicy przeciw Starej Prawicy: Przedmowa
-
Why Buy When You Can Squat?
-
Notes on Plato’s Alcibiades I Part 2
36 comments
It’s easy to question the supposed intelligence of Jews when so many of them support an open border policy in the US that makes their lives less livable. Jews have prospered in the US since it separated from Britain. Bringing in hordes of Moslems and other 3rd worlders only makes the places they live worse. If the S American style revolution comes, they will find themselves first in line to the camps because of their wealth. Not very smart from where I live.
There is an old joke about two hunters who are chased by a bear. One hunter turns to the other and says, ‘We cannot outrun this bear!’ and the other hunter says, ‘I don’t need to outrun the bear, I just need to outrun you.’
The jews don’t care if jews get hurt as long as their enemies get hurt more.
And there’s no doubt that mass migration has hurt Whites more than jews.
In jewish strategic racial logic, that makes mass immigration as winning tactic.
Here, here! They will poke us in the eye even while we are coming to their aid
“Jews feel that it is in their group’s interest to reside in a multicultural state where they can pursue their group evolutionary strategy in countries where the white majority’s power has been attenuated by the presence of multiple competing ethnic groups.”
This one sentence here more or less sums things up. I have some Jewish friends who think they are all edgy mocking WASPs, talking in an exaggerated Larchmont jaw. They also literally think there is a WASP elite running the country like back in the day but of course don’t even think of mention all the Jews in Biden’s cabinet lest you be called an anti-Semite.
Yes, I have wondered what is the long term goal of Jews. Already in Western Europe many Jews have left for Israel for personal security after being relentlessly physically attacked by Muslims.
I think some may hate White Gentiles so much that that is their overriding ambition, and others may have been raised to oppress Whites at every turn so give no thoughts about why they are doing so.
Even the ones who are pro-Israel should understand that without a strong west (especially the US), Israel would not have the finance or weapon supply to exist for very long. With all the missiles they’ve fired over the last couple of weeks, their stockpile must have been severely depleted.
I suspect Jews are far more divided than many think. They present a united front to the outside world, a position that is easy to maintain when you control the media.
As a WASP, dating a Jewish woman is even easier than an Asian or Latina. They hate us while craving our genetics and admiring our phenotype
‘I suspect Jews are far more divided than many think. They present a united front to the outside world, a position that is easy to maintain when you control the media.’
I think it’s fair to say that an elite group of jews gaslights their own people to keep their rabble in line and for profit (of course).
The superpower of the jew is knowing what they want.
They want a jew-friendly culture so they oppose the culture and values of their host nation and replace them with a jew-friendly culture and values.
They want to never get their hands dirty (‘labor’ is a curse. It’s right there in Genesis), so they seek out positions that allow them to exploit others or ‘the professions’ (where they can pursue any number of con-jobs with impunity).
“I also feel sorry for the Jews who are being subjected to genuine acts of barbarity, the same rapine acts of viciousness we see Muslims perpetrate on the women and children of the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, and the rest of Europe.”
I’m no fan of Muslims, but let’s not lose sight of why they are in European countries in the first place. The Iraq War, the intervention in Libya to remove Qaddafi, and the Syrian Civil War with the continued support and promotion of ISIS, were all launched by Zionists to destabilize the Middle East and weaken the Islamic world to protect the state of Israel. The Western Zionists behind Europe’s open borders policy deliberately destabilized the Middle East and murdered Qaddafi in the full awareness that doing so would create a humanitarian crisis and precipitate a flood of Arabs and Africans into Europe. Qaddafi himself told Western leaders that he was the single barrier preventing hordes of Africans from pouring across the Mediterranean.
Zionists have been trying to destabilize the Middle East and broader region for decades, and channel the refugees from the humanitarian fallout into the West. While the Muslim problem in Europe is genuinely awful, Hamas and Palestine and other Islamic nations are hardly culpable for any of that. If we are to ask “what is good for white people” and wanted Muslims out of Europe, it would better to have a strong and stable Middle East, which is currently impossible because Israel is a rogue state devoted to destabilizing the region. Muslims are in Europe because of Zionists, keep coming because of Zionists, and cannot be removed because of Zionists. Israel has been trying to create chaos and channel refugees to Europe for decades, and would still be doing so whether or not the Arabs on hang gliders had decided to smoke a few IDF fighters a couple weeks ago. I think the tendency to focus on Muslims as if they have any agency in this situation or to attribute any blame to Hamas or Palestinians or whatever for the European migrant crisis is completely distorting the issue by misdirecting from the real Zionist culprits. We’d all prefer Arabs stay in the Middle East, but many literally cannot because of the insane genocidal Israeli regime, which is once again carpet bombing civilians and decimating an Arab homeland. This is an old problem and reaches back even further than the invasion of Iraq and the planned destruction of Syria in the early 2000s. Let us not lose sight of the real enemy who is holding all the power and making the decisions.
Good point, American foreign policy has been an absolute disgrace for a long time
There are already ninety million in Egypt and then there are Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Iraq. I’m not saying it should happen but were the occupied territories to be subsumed into Israel the refugees should stay in the region, but they won’t.
“We’d all prefer Arabs stay in the Middle East, but many literally cannot because of the insane genocidal Israeli regime, which is once again carpet bombing civilians and decimating an Arab homeland.”
Is it an absolute fact that all Arab countries in the Middle East are unlivable? I think the truth of the matter is that Arabs prefer to come to the West, whether or not their countries are destabilized. I always wonder, too, where is the vastly wealthy Saudi Arabia when their brethren need a helping hand?
I greatly appreciate and wholeheartedly agree with the author’s query as to which side, if any, should be the deciding factor for White Nationalists: “Is it good for White people?”
You often write interesting essays and offer intelligent comments. But this rant is like something concocted by a militant antiwhite Jew wanting to make prowhites look as unreasonable and irrational as possible. Muslims are not in Europe because of Zionists, nor even because of Jews (is the despicable Merkel a Jew? Blair? Mitterand?). They are there because of the combination of cheap labor interests’ lobbying; white liberal (and misplaced Christian) ‘do-gooderism’ in the setting of “refugee” policy; the Muslim population explosion; the general awfulness of the Middle East and Maghreb compared to infinitely more civilized and prosperous Europe; and the postwar ease of transit to Europe. (Mass immigration to America, however, did have a preponderant Jewish origin.) Quaddafi did play a role in preventing many Africans from embarking on sea voyages to Europe – a role that should be played by Europe’s own governments, and would be, if so many of the best (the toughest and most race-loyal) white genomes hadn’t been disproportionately killed off in two needless Continental wars, leaving disproportionately alive genetically defective white liberals, who have run matters ever since (why, exactly, has the white race become so weak and weird since WW2? my answer: too many of the best of our people died in the wars, all too many without leaving ‘issue’).
If we are to ask “what is good for white people” and wanted Muslims out of Europe, it would better to have a strong and stable Middle East, which is currently impossible because Israel is a rogue state devoted to destabilizing the region.
This is nonsense. If we wanted to decolonize Europe, the condition of the Middle East is irrelevant; what matters is the condition of the characters of white men. Last I checked, whites are still in the majority in Europe (and collectively and without minimizing the scale of the demographico-imperialistic assault, it is still a substantial, if rapidly dwindling, majority). If whites weren’t such intergenerationally selfish virtue-signalers and racially brainwashed douchebags, we never would have capitulated to this migrational warfare; if we stopped being such tomorrow, we still possess the power to take back Europe (America? I’m much less sure). Blaming Zionists really is, in this context, “blaming the Jews” (ie, unfairly).
Moreover, Israel is absolutely not “devoted to destabilizing the region”. What Israel wants is diplomatic recognition from and commercial relations with its neighbors. Granted, they probably don’t want the kind of “stability” afforded by a totalitarian Islamist state, and I’m sure they don’t mind internal civil wars (Syria) weakening actual enemies in the region. But Israel would like nothing more than for the Palestinians to elect leadership that renounces terrorism; recognizes Israel; and then focuses on internal economic development.
I think the tendency to focus on Muslims as if they have any agency in this situation or to attribute any blame to Hamas or Palestinians or whatever for the European migrant crisis is completely distorting the issue by misdirecting from the real Zionist culprits.
This is insane. It’s Muslims themselves who are bent on conquering Europe via bodies not bombs. Muslim governments are using Europe’s auto-genocidal racial weakness in accepting bogus “refugees” a) as a safety valve to relieve some of the population and poverty pressures on themselves by sloughing it off onto Europe, and b) as a mechanism to Islamize the ancient European racial and religious enemy.
Finally, while I of course oppose all foreign aid to Israel, and would like to see European nations encourage their Jewish populations to emigrate to Zion, calling the Israelis genocidalists is simply bizarre. Israel is by far the most civilized state in the region. It goes out of its way NOT to violate Arab human rights. I assure you, if you were destined to be mistakenly arrested by any of the region’s constabularies, you would want it to be Israel’s; if you were to have to parachute out of a burning plane over the territory of any Middle Eastern nation, you would want it to be Israel.
Prowhites should be neither antisemites nor certainly philosemites, but simply JQ realists. I’m speaking “officially” here: on a strictly personal level, while I’m a realist and not an antisemite, I’m not offended by antisemitism. But I think that extreme accusations flung against the Jews make prowhites look bad, and cause less knowledgeable whites to dismiss and shun us. Frankly, I think whites should mostly avoid the JQ altogether, and focus on creating the broadest possible political coalitions to end nonwhite immigration, the greatest issue of my lifetime (I was very anticommunist in the 70s-80s, but I was even more anti-immigrationist). Once the demographic “bleeding” has been stanched, we can move on to other racial problems and threats.
You accuse me of sounding like “militant antiwhite Jew wanting to make prowhiteslook as unreasonable and irrational as possible,” but then in the same breathe call whites “intergenerationally selfish virtue-signalers and racially brainwashed douchebags” and blame ordinary Europeans for replacement immigration. I’m fairly certain that replacement immigration is not a majority preferred policy. It’s being forced on the European majority by Zionist elites. Merkel isn’t a Jew, but she is a Zionist.
This is exactly what I’m talking about. You are blaming whites for policies they didn’t enact. Similarly, while Muslims should be removed from Europe, you’re assigning agency to Muslims for the “invasion” of Europe whereas in fact they’re taking advantage of Zionist policies. Muslims didn’t lobby or subvert European governments. They don’t control anything. They’re opportunistic parasites taking advantage of Zionist policies. Muslims did not “invade” Europe or force their way in, they were invited in by traitorous backstabbing Zionist elites. They wouldn’t be in Europe were they not enjoying the protection of the Zionist ruling elite. I’m reminded of the German (Jewish) politician who recently said: “For me, the new Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the State of Israel and the Jewish people.” European leaders don’t care about their people, they care about liberal internationalism and eradicating white homogenous countries, while simultaneously maintaining the unprincipled exception of protecting the racial apartheid state of Israel.
Also, Israel is absolutely dedicated to destabilizing the Middle East – see the Iraq War and Zionist support of ISIS.
Why are you blaming whites for something they did not do? How is any of this rhetorically useful? Why offer cover for Zionists instead of taking your own side? And why care about how our enemies label us when we could just be stating the truth? The idea that we should try to be “reasonable” or invite any sympathy from Zionists is absurd.
You make some good points in reply to K. Vinther. Wasn’t the post-war European cultural environment heavily influenced by ‘American’ racial equality propaganda though? West Side Story by Bernstein, Sondheim and Rabinowitz (Robbins) comes to mind. Such musical ‘sensations’ were massive phenomena in that era of much more limted choice ( still more than anyone had ever had ). I agree there were many factors favouring the East coming west but a necessary one was the disarming of residual racial solidarity in European countries. The propaganda front is where Jews are most evident but I don’t doubt they were also involved in the transport and consequent exploitation.
“While the Muslim problem in Europe is genuinely awful, Hamas and Palestine and other Islamic nations are hardly culpable for any of that.”
This is a succinct expression of the argument that goes something like this:
“The Jew is omnipotent. He creates a golem. His golem is made up of individuals who have no agency of their own. If it weren’t for the Jew and his unique evil, all the world’s peoples would live in peace with each other, respecting each others’ rights, borders, and ways of life.”
Islamic nations and the Muslims who populate them have agency of their own. The very idea that only the gatekeepers, and not the ones who opt to pass through the gates to do the damage, are culpable is impossible to defend.
Those people were let into Europe by misguided policy which was successfully rationalised at the time. They came, presumably, to escape poor life chances, in their homelands. Once there they faced a choice, whether or not to assimilate, but as more of them came assimilation became less and less necessary. Now that they are a sizeable minority they are ready to press for more power and consideration. If a self-identified people see an opportunity for power or territory they will take it, unless their brains have been addled by liberalism, which theirs haven’t. They think in terms of collective self-interest, as we did, albeit less and less, until the 1960s.
So who is ultimately to blame? Surely it’s the people who implemented the policy and the people and ideas which influenced them. Some of them, at a minimum, knew that this would be catastrophic for the demographics of Europe. I don’t think many of the individual migrants had any such thought when embarking.
“So who is ultimately to blame? Surely it’s the people who implemented the policy and the people and ideas which influenced them. Some of them, at a minimum, knew that this would be catastrophic for the demographics of Europe. I don’t think many of the individual migrants had any such thought when embarking.”
* * *
In simplest terms, we blame:
Gatekeepers (governmental: Jewish, white, or nonwhite)
Facilitators (e.g., individual citizens, NGOs, lobbyists, activists, etc.) of any ethnicity or creed, who help gatekeepers and opportunists to enter and exploit white countries
Opportunists (e.g., nonwhite ‘migrants,’ ‘refugees,’ ‘expats,’ etc.) of any ethnicity or creed, who take advantage of the gatekeepers’ machinations, by entering white countries, even legally
* * *
This pass you’re giving to the opportunists is far too lenient.
It’s like saying, “Well, I don’t blame my poor neighbor for robbing my house while I was on vacation; he’s poor and was only trying to better his lot. I really blame my other neighbor who had a spare key and let him in.”
Or, “I don’t blame my neighbor for raping my wife. I really blame my other neighbor who put a muscle relaxer in her drink when she wasn’t looking.”
* * *
That way of thinking is just indefensible.
@James Kirkpatrick
That is a nice analysis, Mr. Kirkpatrick.
However, I think it needs an amendment.
After committing their respective fiendish acts, the robber and the rapist then stay in that very same house and enjoy the hospitality of their wounded hosts, who instead of resisting and neutralizing these criminals bestow them accommodations and encourage more such intrusions.
The conduct of the hosts communicate an impression that their place is a haven for the selfish, hedonist, and vicious; and that doors are always open for delinquents and mischief-makers.
That the owners instead of reclaiming and fighting for their hearth prefer to stay in the basement is more disturbing than the assaults themselves.
in the first place
In the first place, the problems of the Middle East and the migration of its inhabitants to Europe are caused by the destruction of the albeit imperfect, but more or less working social order of the Ottoman Empire, the destruction caused by the British Colonel Lawrence of Arabia and the traitorous Arab sheikhs. After the defeat and collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the Middle East was divided by British and French colonialists, and the borders were drawn without taking into account any ethnic and religious characteristics of the people living on these lands. And it is these borders between the artificial states that are the source of eternal conflicts in the area.
I also feel sorry for the Jews who are being subjected to genuine acts of barbarity, the same rapine acts of viciousness we see Muslims perpetrate on the women and children of the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, and the rest of Europe.
???
Firstly, comparing the heinous acts of criminal migrants with the genuine nationalist resistance of an indigenous people is, with all due respect, extremely brainless.
Secondly, what is the evidence of all this “rapine” and “genuine acts of barbarity”? IDF?? The documented baby-killers who spread the nonsense about “beheaded babies”.
The “massacre” [if there was any] at the rave party was a cross fire between Zionist forces and the resistance fighters. Moreover, a lot of these attendees managed to escape.
Moral of the story: Don’t party on stolen land or in a war zone.
Thirdly, there are video evidence and testimony accounts of women who were spared and not subjected to “barbarity” and “rapine”. What to make of these facts?
According to the media-wing of the Al-Qassam Brigades [the armed-wing of Hamas], they have just released an American mother and her daughter. Let’s see how they were treated under Hamas.
Fourthly, most of the women who are in custody were serving in the IDF. Why should one feel sorry for these Zionist armed princesses?
Yet, I am sure Hamas will not treat them like these vermin have been treating Palestinian Muslims and Christians.
Fifthly, almost 30 to 40% of those killed were uniformed personnel [Army and Police]. Also, settler parasites do not count as “innocent civilians”. Most of them were armed and they were trespassing.
What did they expect?
Lastly, this was not a fight between Jews and Muslims.
It was between Palestinians [Muslims (some of them direct descendants of those Jewish tribes who embraced Islam and adopted the Arabic language) and Arab Christians] and Zionist settler parasitical gangsters currently under the protection of “Israel”.
But, sadly, with the emergence of Kahanist and ultra-orthodox dingbats, the struggle is now between Islam and Zionism.
Your last point is extremely important because the vast majority of the time when one hears reports about this conflict it is said as being between jews and muslims instead of palestinians and israelis.
I have thought about this issue for awhile. Ultimately, I believe Israel must suffer for this. Greg Johnson has a good point about the potential influx of Palestinian migrants into the western world. I too am deeply concerned about this potential problem. However, Israel is a moralizing symbol for Judaism, even for secular jews. They must know that they are utterly alone after subverting our people maliciously for centuries. Fuck Israel, but I won’t support Palestinian migrants either.
Cowardly take.
Nothing wrong with taking one’s own side.
Taking Our Own Side by Michael Polignano is an excellent book, and the title is the best part of it. Taking our own side is the price of sanity and the only path to survival for our race.
We should keep the ideal of the sane White who takes the side of his own race in front of our eyes every day. This is the kind of White that will save us from White genocide.
There is no other kind of White that will save us. The kind of White who thinks that Jews are the protagonists of the story that we should care about won’t save us. The kind of White who thinks that Palestinians are the protagonists of the story that we should care about won’t save us. It’s the same for Blacks, Asians, and all other groups. Putting them first won’t save us. Only Whites who correctly understand who we are and who take our own side can guide us toward our survival.
We shouldn’t let ourselves be bluffed out of taking our own side by emotive words such as “cowardice,” or by religious or philosophical theories that attach no value to our race.
We should admire and strive to embody the ideal of the sane, realistic White who takes the side of his own race, that is one who takes the side of our own race.
Whoever is against this ideal is no better than a madman.
(If it’s not obvious, I think the article by Gunnar Alfredsson is very good.)
The difference between ‘cowardice’ and ‘prudence’ is simply how things turn out and who writes the after–action report (AKA ‘history’).
“The difference between ‘cowardice’ and ‘prudence’ is simply how things turn out and who writes the after–action report (AKA ‘history’).”
I want loyal pro-Whites to be survivors who write the history of how we got over this crisis and came to thrive as a race. I don’t believe that will happen without our making an effort to achieve it.
It seems to me that, regardless of how things will turn out, only those Whites who take our own side can be called prudent.
If a White man thinks he is “Black with a White skin,” or “spiritually Jewish regardless of biological ancestry,” or part of some global community such that “we are all Palestinians now,” and consequently he strives only for the survival of what he falsely imagines to be his kind, ignoring the plight of his actual race, he cannot be prudent. Even if someone else saves our race against his will, so that he winds up on the winning side in some sense, he himself was not prudent.
If a man falsely imagined that he was the Sun, and he took no care for himself or his family because he thought the Sun and its satellites were in no immediate danger, he would be a fool even if his descendants got to write history books.
Failing to identify as who we are, in plain biological terms, is like that. It’s madness. It can’t be made into prudence.
Its interesting to see which media outlets always rallied against support for ukraine now demand support for israel. These conflicts have something practical at least, because the ukraine war exposed the shills for putin, now the israel war exposes the jewish lobby as also the russian lobby.
Also find it kinda humerous how the article writes of “the jews” like an Hamas outlet would, instead of the israelis. And still there are conflicts and disagreements within israeli society about the current administration.
I also think there won’t be a ground invasion of gaza, because there wasn’t one last time Israels military doctrine is the protection of their own troops as highest priority and so their offensive capabilities are rather limited because of that. The israeli army mobilized around 325.000 troops of which maybe 1/8th is combat troops. With this measily number they can’t take on an urban area in which 2 million people lived, not even if that urban area is a highly surveilled prison camp. They have the palestinians already where they want them and won’t risk a multitude of the count of hostages in casualties. Their troops are a bit too itchy anyway and so you see some reports where IDF soldiers shot at and in some cases killed settlers.
@Rubicon
A gang whose operational experience comprises of humiliating, dishonoring, and bombing the defenseless should indeed think twice, thrice, fourfold etc., before committing its spoilt brats to take on a spiritually/metapolitically disciplined and highly determined group of men like Hamas or Hezbollah.
Greg Johnson has not been adequately challenged on the ethno-nationalism question. Gregory Hood had a completely different argument, and Wignats do not have the time-preference to articulate this dilemma.
I agree mostly with ‘nationalism for all,’ but just like communism, it looks great on paper…Yet that is not reality.
Zionism does not belong in this spreadsheet. It is opposed to any form of nationalism that stands in the way to Greater Israel. It will support only certain nationalisms only insofar as it comports to Greater Israel geopolitics, such as Kurdish statehood and Azerbaijani irredentism solely because both undermine the the territory of Iran.
So you say if Jews don’t have a state in Israel they will be forced to return to Western countries and further dominate our politics.
Yes, they will return, but they already dominate our politics. It only takes a minimum threshold of Jews to control the government of a country, just like it only takes a minimum amount of blacks to destroy a neighborhood.
As for this current Palestinian-Israeli War, the correct position to take is with the Arabs.
If Israel wins, they will pogrom more Arabs into Europe, which they already do during the intervals anyway because nobody can live like Palestinians have been forced to.
Would you rather have millions of Jewish or Arab refugees? I would say Jewish refugees because at least they are not re-spawning like they are in Israel. There is no much difference between 1 million Jews and 4 million Jews in your country, but there is a monumental difference in Arabs.
We can never form any alliance with Zionism or the rest of it.
You could say that every nationalism is the bad, aggressive, beggar-thy-neighbor nationalism. It is a standard anti-nationalist talking point. If you want to define Zionism as “inherently bad” nationalism, congratulations, you’ve won the argument by merely defining your terms.
My primary concern is white people gaining control of their own countries and destinies, and a key player of the anti-white coalition that rules us is Jewish. That last thing whites need is for our opponents to get millions of reinforcements from Israel. Now you pop up with the argument that Jewish power is absolutely maxed out, so reinforcements would hardly matter. That’s obviously an arbitrary assertion on your part.
The correct position on this war is to side with whites. There really isn’t any contest here anyway. When (not if) Israel wins, there will be calls for the West to absorb millions of Palestinian refugees. We simply have to say no. If our governments maintain that the Palestinians are so heinous that Israel can morally punish them collectively, they cannot be allowed to turn around and claim that these same people will be wonderful additions to our society when they turn up as beggars.
The idea of an alliance with Zionism is a red herring. I am for the idea of Zionism because the Jewish diaspora is hostile and abusive to white host populations. But the most powerful ethnic group on the planet does not make alliances with powerless commentators on the internet.
I am guess that you are a fan of Hamas because you are not a fan of Jews. But who are you for, if you come to this platform and argue that we should choose to be flooded with millions of Jews just so you have the pleasure of contemplating Israel being destroyed?
I am for *our* people. I chose a provocative handle because I am ecstatic. I had a chat with a recently-married ‘French-Tunisian’ tonight at a hostile bar. I am not a drinker anymore, but I had to be for this. He loves what I say besides that there is no difference between Zionist and Jew. He doesn’t want jihad. He is scared and softened by westernization. I say this is war. We have no choice when it comes calling. He can’t congratulate what Hamas did, but only cries for the suffering of the Palestinian people. I said what Hamas did was a necessary catalyst that nobody else has done since 1945. This is a rare inflection point in history. A controversial group is doing what is necessary. Zionism and International Jewry is on the backfoot for once, perhaps the only time in our lifetime. We must keep pushing them while they are down because if not they will get up and crush us all like they have done since 1945 and before that.
I’m not so sure Israel will ‘win.’ They didn’t win in 2006. They made the terms and they lost: ‘defeat Hezbollah.’ All Hezbollah had to do was survive, which they did. They still haven’t invaded Gaza despite all the masturbatory fantasies of Itmar Ben-Gavir.
I don’t for a second believe Biden is ‘holding back’ the invasion of Gaza, and I’m certain you don’t either. The IDF is afraid of the unprecedented casualties they will absolutely take. They have gotten rustily complacent.
Listen to the Egyptian Jon Stewart explain the ratio of Israeli to Palestinian casualties since the Second Intifada. It’s absurd, but it’s over now. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4idQbwsvtUo
Israel has once again made that same mistake: ‘Defeat Hamas.’ It is not going to happen.
Hamas has already won no matter how many casualties they take. I am grateful for their fortitude even if I am not a Muslim or Arab. They got the ball rolling when they didn’t have to at great risk to their very existence. Many comparisons have been made to WWII, but this really feels like a prelude to WWIII. We all feel it now, don’t we?
I’m tired of these people, Greg. I know you are too. This is not ‘every nationalism.’ This is Zionism. It’s its own special category. They don’t allow us to have an identity, yet they have a ‘special relationship’ that requires no treaty (perimeters). When they spy on us (Jonathan Pollard) it’s not really ‘spying.’ When they bomb our ships (USS Liberty) it’s not really an act of war. When they dominate our government (Biden’s cabinet), it’s not really ZOG. I can go on and on. This is ‘exceptionalism.’
Zionism won’t end with this, but it will be bloodied. It will fracture. There will be Jewish divisions for the first time since Tsarist Russia (Labor Zionism, Jewish Bund, Bolshevism etc).
It will reverberate in America too, shining the light on the fake leftist anti-Zionism (no such thing) and fake Jewish anti-Zionism (no such thing), causing further realignment/dealignment. The real challenge will be if the Cuckservatives/Boomers can maintain America First. So far they have not. But the hypocrisy of their anti-Ukraine position is unavoidable, but their evangelical piety is unsustainable compared to the post 9/11 fervor we know too well. That’s why Trump is still so intrinsic as a wild card despite his conditional Zionism. Republican voters will do anything he says, which he is liable to say anything depending on his predicament.
You do sound a bit giddy.
We can start dismantling our diversity mess in our once-white country by first taking down the so-called “Statue of Liberty” in New York harbor, and the horrid ‘p0em’ at its base by Emma Lazarus, a Jewish Activist from way back. We do not need any more ‘wretched refuse’ or any ‘wretched Jihadis’ on our shores, just for starters.
And in keeping with the thread of the Author here, I say as well:
“A Pox on Both Their Houses”.
“Foreign wars that were at one time none of our concern are now being waged by proxy in the streets of our major cities.”
A little strange that statement, let me reformulate it to make it more clear:
“We entered foreign wars that were at no time any of our concern. This empowered our Jewish minority and emboldened it to start even more wars and relax our immigration policies until the mess we created abroad arrived in the center of our cities.”
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment