3,376 words
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of our readers. So far this year, we’ve raised $67,367.84 of our $300,000 goal. I want to thank everyone who has donated so far. (Please donate here!) Now, Beau Albrecht will explain how crucial your support is within the larger struggle for the survival of our people — and what our overall strategy for taking back the narrative should be.
* * *
What’s in a narrative? To make a long discussion very brief, one way of looking at it is that it’s a story told about a particular topic. It’s typically spun a certain way, portraying one side as the good guys. Memetics is a similar concept, though we’ve come to think of memes as counterpropaganda images spread online, which is only part of the picture. All this might seem rather dry, but the truth is that the implications are enormous. The upheaval our contemporary society is undergoing has much to do with a massive war of narratives.
The ideological lineup
The battle for the hearts and minds of Western civilization has been underway for a little over a century, and went into high gear during the 1960s. The stakes by now are tremendous. Following a long campaign of agitation, a broad coalition formed out of politicized factions of non-whites, white renegades, and other disaffected social groups. This is the contemporary Left in a nutshell.
What do they want? This liberal-minority coalition is vying for preferential treatment toward their constituents, and for resources — money, territory, political clout, and so forth — from their rivals (that’s us). A major tactic of theirs is to popularize certain narratives that are advantageous to them. This allows the Leftist coalition to hold together, despite being comprised of disparate groups that have little to do with each other. These are groups that would normally have their own interests and agendas. Bound together, they stay on target; we’re the target, of course. The battle of rhetoric also makes the case for why they should acquire free goodies at our expense.
Aside from that, their top priority is obviously to keep whites from standing up for themselves while they’re draining our resources and doing whatever they have planned for us. That facet of Leftist indoctrination has a biological equivalent in spider venom, which paralyzes the prey so that it won’t try to break free or fight back while its vital juices are sucked out of it. There’s a vast array of narratives that Leftists use to this end. Consider the following to be a brief summary.
For one thing, they have an arsenal of race denialist talking points, slick rhetoric crafted to reach the predetermined conclusion that race isn’t real. (After one phony argument after another has been exposed, the public should stop paying attention to anything that Leftist race denialists say.) Then there are narratives to generate white guilt. Many of these are about historical events, usually one-sided and highly exaggerated, and in some cases falling apart entirely under close examination. Some of them are intended to demonize white leaders and notables; others are to deify famous non-whites. Other narratives are about pushing the idea that it’s wrong, immoral, or evil for us to discuss race honestly, think collectively, have in-group preferences, assert our common interests, or even defend ourselves. Another category of narratives is needed to justify the double standards. A popular one lately is “whiteness” – it basically says that all races are the same, except that whites are uniquely evil; of course, they’re not really talking about white people, but it just so happens that only whites have this evil characteristic of “whiteness.” Moreover, it’s impossible for non-whites to be morally responsible for anything bad they do — which, of course, is a corollary to the “society made him do it” narrative.
What about the other side? The Right opposes the Left, of course, but it gets complicated. One problem is that the major faction — the mainstream Right, who are mostly neocons at this point — isn’t particularly helpful. Although they have their narratives, too, generally they are timid and don’t challenge core Leftist narratives. One of these is that a good constitution is what makes a country good. (Really, no matter what the founding documents say, a government is only as good as the people running it.) Another is that anyone can arrive from any far corner of the world and will culturally assimilate and fit in perfectly the moment they’ve stepped onto our soil and begun to appreciate our free way of life. Critics sometimes call that the “magic dirt” argument; moving to a different country doesn’t change someone’s allegiances, worldview, or basic nature. Weaksauce narratives such as that are obviously hardly better than Leftist drivel. The mainstream Right could even be considered as controlled opposition. It’s either that, or they simply enjoy fighting with one hand tied behind their backs.
On the other hand, the dissident Right certainly does challenge Leftist narratives head-on. Thus, the left must work itself up into foaming-at-the-mouth denunciations in order to protect its own rhetorical armory. The mainstream Right helps them with this ritual denunciation, in order to show what nice guys they are — not that they even get a pat on the back for their efforts. This is all quite a farce, but it would be much funnier if the fate of civilization as we know it weren’t at stake. Of all the ideological categories, the dissident Right offers the most opposition — and experiences the greatest difficulty in getting its message out.
The forces arrayed against us
What determines the outcome of a battle of narratives? To a large degree, it’s the same as in a conventional battle. There’s a maxim attributed to Nathan Bedford Forrest, the Confederate General and founder of the Tri-Kappa fraternity: “Get there firstest with the mostest.” The Left has a tremendous advantage here. From the beginning, they’ve prioritized gaining control over opinion-forming institutions. These include the following:
- The mainstream media includes six megaconglomerates that own 90% of the United States’ media outlets. Five are virulently Leftist, comprising The System’s propaganda arm. One is mainstream conservative/controlled opposition, which leaves much to be desired as an alternative.
- The university system, especially the elite schools, was one of the first institutions to be cooped by Leftists. A degree is considered a ticket to the middle class, but in most cases this includes a four-year ideological deep fry for impressionable students.
- The three major advertising firms piggyback racial demoralization propaganda into advertisements, along with other narratives in service to feminism, GLBT advocacy, etc.
- Social media companies quite often have special departments that act as ideological gatekeepers in cyberspace, sometimes assisted by sophisticated censorship algorithms that have been carefully developed by unprincipled programmers.
- “Fact checkers” are newcomers to the Ministry of Truth, attempting to pass themselves off as the arbiters of truth.
- Major corporations almost universally indulge in virtue-signaling of some sort, along with other uses for soft power.
- K-12 public schools have been politicized to a degree unimaginable in the past, largely due to top-down centralization.
- Influenced by ecumenical umbrella groups, many mainline Christian churches push ultracalvinist and social gospel messages. (Evangelicals, Mormons, and Eastern Orthodoxy are mostly exceptions.) This effectively puts a plastic halo on Leftist ideology.
- Pornographers likewise aggressively push racial demoralization propaganda, even though most of their viewers don’t want it.
There will be exceptions, of course. For example, a few school districts in Flyover Country might resist some particular propaganda initiative by the Department of Education. But that doesn’t mean all is well with the rest. Similarly, the lack of a gender studies doctorate program at Brigham Young University isn’t evidence of widespread ideological diversity in the university system.
To make all this happen, it takes more than just propaganda saturation. The Left has to stack the deck through censorship, intimidation tactics, and any other dirty tricks available to keep contradictory views from getting a fair hearing. Some people even make a career out of protecting The Narrative: mainstream media journalists, foundation staffers, Leftist professors, information goalies in cyberspace, and so on. In some cases, it’s pretty slim pickings, but they have plenty of rubes willing to do it. In the US the greatest peril is cancel culture, though countries with “hate speech” laws have criminal penalties for hurty words and Narrative Violations. In times past, there were gulags for this sort of thing.
All told, full-spectrum propaganda saturation such as this constitutes milieu control. This needs to be confronted. The stakes are higher than ever — or at least since the 1960s. With the rhetoric as shrill as it is, and the fact that the Left doesn’t know when to knock it off, this could come to a bad end. There are plenty of examples in history of what happens when those types gain unlimited power. The way some of them are talking already, it’s entirely possible that they’re not prepared to stop until they’re dancing on our graves. If it ever came to that, soon after they’ll wonder why the lights went out for good — but that’s another matter.
We’re in a war of ideas, up against the most formidable propaganda campaign ever assembled. Although dissident Rightists can see through it and reject it, The System has bamboozled a large fraction of the public. In particular, they’ve been feeding blue pills to liberals until they don’t know what’s real. Moreover, many people who should be on our side would prefer to hinder us instead. As for the effectiveness of mainstream conservatives against our common opponents, they’re the type who’d limit themselves to Marquess of Queensberry boxing rules while a mugger is fighting them to the death. It isn’t good enough. The price for losing the war of ideas will likely be dispossession, if not worse.
All told, this paints a quite gloomy picture. The enemy has the Big Megaphone. At least presently, anything we can bring to bear against it seems as outclassed as a Civil War ironclad going up against an aircraft carrier. In the meantime, there are vast numbers of our own people who aren’t even trying to save themselves. What can we do?
The problem with not having the truth on their side
Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who’s the prettiest woman of all?
The good news is the Left suffers from a major flaw resulting from their overconfidence that they’re right, no matter what the inconvenient facts are. Another factor is their desire to work things out from first principles. Specifically, they prioritize their theories over objective reality. The truth gets in the way, and contradictions will inevitably pile up. When the tires meet the trail, this causes unexpected results, none of them good. Not only do Leftists have to deny reality, they try to alter the facts (and especially the perception thereof), trying to make them accord with their defective theories. Then everything melts into subjectivist mush. Putting it another way, the Left has been peddling magic pixie dust since Rousseau, and selling it by the bushel since Marx.
Who is it that insists race is nothing more than skin color? Who declares that men and women are exactly the same except for some unimportant body parts? For that matter, who’s claiming that men can become women merely by declaring they are? Who tells us that criminals are the victims of society? On the basis of blatantly wrong dogma such as the foregoing, who keeps peddling grandiose social engineering projects that don’t work? When they fail, who refuses to imagine that the premises might be wrong, and then proposes to double down on them?
It takes much effort to sustain an ideology propped up by wishful thinking and magic pixie dust. A non-stop barrage of propaganda is needed to make any of that Leftist hogwash even remotely believable. (A little willful ignorance helps, too, which liberals are happy to supply for themselves despite any cognitive dissonance.) The Left has no choice but to keep up this degree of indoctrination. If they failed to maintain the illusion, then the spell would be broken. Sooner or later, their ideology would collapse like a house of cards. When social media censorship departments play Whack-A-Mole with the ban-stick to keep naughty Rightist ideas off of their platforms, it’s because they have to prevent the heresy from reaching the free marketplace of ideas. Although censorship makes them look like the petty tyrants they are, it’s in response to their greatest fear: that we’ll awaken the Sleeping Giant.
Here’s a fanciful physics analogy. Let’s say it requires one watt of power to tell a lie. It also takes one watt to tell the truth, which will refute the lie in a fair and open debate. Thus, the liar must turn up the dial in order to be believed in proportion to how important the lie is to maintaining the illusion that he’s telling the truth. We’ll suppose that it takes ten watts to muddy the waters enough to give the lie equal footing against one person telling the plain truth. To create a mistaken consensus, a hundred watts is needed to hoodwink most people into believing the lie, rather than the lone dissenter. A kilowatt is required to shout down the truth aggressively, making competing narratives seem like nutty fringe opinions or a “conspiracy theory.” For an utter whopper that’s self-evidently false, an entire megawatt must be expended to turn the lie into an orthodoxy that would be practically unthinkable to contradict. So there you have it: For a liar to protect a critical false narrative, it takes a metric ton of obfuscation and repression to overpower merely a small amount of counterpropaganda.
Note well: This should go without saying, but I’m not recommending lying!
The Left has the advantage of carrying the Big Megaphone, but they drastically reduce their effectiveness by lying and spin-doctoring ceaselessly. Although a good fraction of liberals will eat up the mainstream media’s fresh bullshit like it’s a steaming plate of refried beans, the rest of us aren’t so easily convinced. In fact, most people don’t care for someone pissing on their collective leg and telling them it’s raining. Meanwhile, those of us who point out that the Emperor has no clothes will do quite a bit of damage to The Narrative.
This is much like what the strategists call asymmetrical warfare. In the military context, this was a frequent staple of modern spit-in-your-eye wars from Vietnam to the Bidet junta’s badly-bungled rout in Afghanistan. The most powerful country isn’t necessarily the victor; rather, the side that holds out the longest wins. By now, we’ve moved onto fifth generation warfare, that of information and narratives, and it turns out that our side has some advantages here.
Returning to the earlier naval analogy, the effect of the truth being on our side is like the ironclad being equipped with armor-piercing rounds, while the aircraft carrier is firing birdshot. Put more plainly, the war of ideas will be difficult, but it’s not impossible. Also, the Left can’t meme. They’ve lost their sense of humor, too. This puts them at a disadvantage before the public. They’re easy to ridicule, and all they can do in response is to be crabby and pout. Finally, The System’s information blockade just isn’t what it used to be in earlier times when it was nearly total. For that matter, although the legacy mainstream media still has a powerful impact, it has been struggling to remain economically viable for a while now.
The mainstream media can be thought of as a gigawatt propaganda transmitter, and the other opinion-forming institutions that have been seized by the Left are likewise powerful signal-boosters as well. Even so, they presently have their hands full pushing the Party Line loudly enough to dominate public discourse while shouting down dissenters. The combined Leftist propaganda front is currently on the defensive, even though they’re cheating by resorting to censorship. If the number of dissenters increased greatly, and/or their capability to deliver their messages expands, then the battle of narratives would become a rout! We still have much work to do, but the good news is that you can help.
What can be done?
In normal circumstances, a nation’s government should be looking out for the public, but we know quite well where their priorities are. This means that we no longer have the luxury of regarding national self-preservation as somebody else’s job. For now, educating the public remains the most important effort. Obviously we’ll need to do many more things than that in the future, but first things first. There’s a lot of work to do in the battle for hearts and minds, and we need all hands on deck. We’ve recently made some important headway in the present war of narratives, so let’s keep it up. Once the Sleeping Giant is awakened, the possibilities will be endless. Let’s make it happen!
Individually, we’ll have to decide on our own level of commitment. Surely we would all rather live in a decent, sane society ruled by a government that puts our people’s interests first and ensures that we have a future. Ask yourself this: How much do you want it? Let that be your guide to the amount of effort you should put into making it happen. Again, we can’t afford to think of this as someone else’s job. It’s time to consider the many ways that you can take constructive action.
For starters, there are those who say that our side is preaching to the choir. I’ve heard this now and then; it’s a fair observation. The good news is that there’s an easy fix for that. It’s as simple as reaching for the “share” button, or e-mailing your friends when you’ve found something informative. You can do your part to make it happen. Problem solved!
Other than that, there’s much opportunity in face-to-face outreach. The Tech Tyrants, even with all their billions of dollars and their censorship departments, can’t do squat about two people having a conversation in the real world. This isn’t to say one should be the loudmouthed uncle who always brings politics to the Thanksgiving table. Neither should one take unnecessary risks, such as at work. Those matters aside, judiciously conducted personal networking can be effective. Keep in mind that it takes a while for messages to sink in, so don’t expect results overnight.
Note also that most people “go with the flow” and take their social cues from what other people are doing. Bold defiance of political correctness on your part will therefore help inspire boldness in others. Although there’s little that a single individual can do, mass action can awaken the Sleeping Giant. Until then, even a shopping trip offers opportunities for starting conversations — such as remarking on how much prices have gone up thanks to mismanagement by the senile girl-sniffer whose party stuffed the ballot box. Also, Leftists can get quite snotty when they’re entirely among themselves — but when someone interrupts the consensus in one of their echo chambers, it can take some of the piss and vinegar out of them.
If you don’t have a lot of time for personal networking, or if you wish to do more than that, then you can donate to your favorite cause. How about us? Counter-Currents publishes many high-quality articles and podcasts a month, sometimes over 100. We’d appreciate it if you pitch in for our operating expenses, and we’ll do the rest to get the message out. (If your budget is tight, just drop the cable TV bill; you’ll feel better without all their demoralization propaganda, anyway!) It will take action and resources to win the war of narratives, which is the first step to returning society to a healthy and normal condition.
Once again: How much do you want it?
* * *
There are many ways to help, but the easiest is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.
You can explore all your donation options on our newly-redesigned Donate page.
Also, check out our new Paywall page!
For a preview of events in the coming year, check out our birthday page.
Remember: Those who fight for a better world live in it today.
Thank you again for your loyal readership and generous support.
Greg Johnson
Editor-in-Chief
16 comments
Miss Universe is a private company so I don’t see the relevance to the article.
I believe we just had this conversation. Once again, I recommend that we agree to disagree about the matter. Even so, you have my best wishes.
I thought it was clear enough. The point was that the left’s racial dogma does not have truth on its side and obviously conflicts with reality, just like the man selected as Miss Universe is obviously not a beautiful woman. Normal people can see this, so it requires constant effort via contorted explanations and propaganda to maintain the illusion. This is a strategic disadvantage for our opponents, making asymmetrical information warfare possible.
Normal people believe that gender is largely a social role and changing gender is doable.
15% of Americans believe that “Sex can be different from birth” (Pew research – views of transgenderism, Pew research – America’s religious landscape), specifically six in ten amongst “religiously unaffiliated.”
The belief that sex and gender is irreversibly chromosomal, with zero wiggle room for Miss Universe contests, is a favourite plank of Right wing reactionary griping that ignores the absolutely fractional, down in the percentage of percentage points size of this demographic.
Essentially griping about LGBTQ+ has become a consolation prize for failing on all other issues, notably: the war on drugs, the war on terror, border security, security of the ballot, gun control, abortion, legalisation of alcohol and marijuana, freedom of speech on online platforms, loss of cultural clout at a grassroots level let alone the cinema; the proletarianisation of right wing culture to “Trump” sycophancy, etc. etc. etc.
Because of a failure to prioritise and decide a single defining issue, the Right has always been ‘broadly against’ a large number of things, and lost on each and every single one of them for a lack of concentrating energy and mobilising people who might agree with them on that *one* issue, but disagree with them on all other issues. The Left does not suffer from this, and mobilises people constantly based on *one* specific issue, at the cost of other issues – there are plenty of Leftists who are closet racists or who like guns, but will pay the price on those issues for the sake of civil rights and wealth redistribution.
Because of this being ‘broadly against’ a large number of things, but not deciding on racial demographics as a key, defining issue that supersedes all other issues, the right wing has been going down the toilet since 2016, when Border Security stopped being a unifying issue after it became bogged down in the failure of the Trump presidency. The right has been casting around for the next big thing to get everyone collectively mad and mobilised about, and has settled on trannies.
But, even if you, as you say, believe this is typical of leftist egalitarian dogma, it’s still a non-issue socially as self-identifying transgenders account for less than one in three hundred people. BUT. Even amongst the most vocally anti-trans demographic, Christians, there is a strong belief in civil liberties, personal autonomy, so on and so forth. Amongst Christians, six in ten say “sex is determined by birth.” Despite this, more than half – 59%, or six in ten, approximately – say that either society has “Not gone far enough” or “Has been about right” in “Accepting transgenders.” I.e. an expression of complacency or support for outright furthering representation and social acceptance of transgenders.
So while trannies account for a fraction of a percentage, the political blowback from being anti-trans is much, much larger. Transgenderism is NOT a racial issue, it is purely a question of bodily autonomy and civil rights. So when the Right does it’s normal anti-tranny song and dance about how they’re all just unconvincing crossdressers and allegedly child molestors too, no one who isn’t already convinced will listen, and those who aren’t convinced will be alienated.
I come from a white immigrant background from Europe to Britain and have cut my teeth amongst the working classes up and down the United Kingdom. I have always found the outright hatred of social and sexual minorities – of other white people, no less – to be absolutely repulsive and repugnant. The constant tranny-bashing is boring as it is gross. We all get it, heterosexual purists don’t like any beauty pageant which they don’t get executive fiat over.
Very thorough and accurate description of the state of affairs, Beau. What to do about it? Last January, I submitted the following brief article, which was not accepted or acknowledged receipt of. I tried again with American Renaissance, and they rejected it with one word, “impractical”. (A few months later, the Bud Light boycott took off spontaneously.) Here’s the article:
I have read about, and heard described in podcasts, a desire for remaking countries and alliances with the aim of restoring white civilization. Secessionist talk is very popular now.
My meagre knowledge of history provides scarcely any instances of countries undergoing quick, drastic transformations without an extravagant amount of bloodshed. The majority of examples involve massive destruction and repression of the losers. The only figure in recent history that I know of who had some brief success in advancing white civilization, unfortunately also had an insatiable lust for territory and some understandable issues with Jews that turned into an obsession for their annihilation. We’re still living with the consequences of that.
The collapse of the Soviet Union was initially followed by exuberance in the west and in many of the subjugated countries. Now, Russia and Ukraine are at war. Historical patterns of internecine European warfare seem to be reasserting themselves. There is little evidence for optimism that a peaceful, mutually agreed upon partition here is any more likely now than in 1861.
I offer a very modest proposal that could, I think, have revolutionary effects in America without any bloodshed. The plan is simply this: everyone on the right side of the racial/political spectrum, from full fledged klansmen to soccer moms who are tired of having their children beaten up and taught to believe that they deserve it, to boycott the next Super Bowl.
I’ve talked to friends who seem to despise all the woke crap that is part of professional sports. They loathe CRT, DIE, BLM, and black history month. They don’t flinch when I use the nigger-word in descriptions of the perpetrators of heinous crimes, or outrageous political and corporate favoritism. They sneer at all the propaganda blended into the game and the half time show. But they still watch, and thereby support all those things. I try to shame them by saying something like, “so, you ate the whole plate of turds that was served along with the game but just held them in your mouth until it was over and then spit them out, and that was your way of protesting?” They just look back at me with shit-eating grins.
If a large scale boycott could be brought about, the effects would be sizable, immediate, direct, and safe.
SIZABLE: The cost to advertisers for a one minute commercial is $6.5 million. The half time show costs its sponsor $50 million. The total take is around half a billion.
IMMEDIATE: The advertisers’ would be screaming into their phones to the league, demanding refunds as soon as the game started and the viewership was way down.
DIRECT:
•The economic impact could not be stolen or subverted like an election.
•There would be no reliance on politicians to carry out their promises, not that any politicians since George Wallace have promised to do anything approaching what we want. (And even he had an awokening of sorts, but that may have been induced by pain and the drugs used to alleviate it.)
SAFE:
•No damage, harm, or inconvenience would come to innocent bystanders, as might occur even with genuinely and totally peaceful street demonstrations.
•It would not require anyone to expose themselves to humiliation, violence, incarceration, or ruinous lawfare — no Charlottesville or January 6.
•You don’t even have to send anyone a complaint (which would likely be ignored anyway).
•All it takes is to abstain from watching a particular TV program for a few hours.
But, if there’s anything Americans like more than guns, grillin’ and SUV’s it’s the Super Bowl. Pulling that suck toy out of their mouths would be harder than launching a full oil tanker into orbit. On second thought, storming the Bastille might be easier.
For this to be effective, it would have to be known how much viewership of the Stupid Bowl suffered, and why. There are ratings agencies, such as Nielsen’s, which do surveys to find out who watched what. If viewership of the Stupid Bowl has been declining quietly over the years, it’s not enough to shock the advertisers and alert them into seeing that a large part of the public is turned off by woke ads and halftime antics.
What would work is a mass email campaign. “Hello, Gillette, I saw your advertisement and I think it was really snotty and tone-deaf. I want an apology for that now, or you’ll never see another nickel from me.” Although one email like that would have no effect, imagine a thousand such messages arriving. That would get a lot of attention and make them see why their sales numbers sucked after that stunt!
How does one organize a mass email campaign? We all have friends we can contact, they do too, and so forth. That’s what the leftists have been doing all along. If we can step up the game, we’ll get results.
Yes. This is exactly it. I have done this in the past where I invite friends to write a short email and include a short letter of complaint/disgust that is ready made for them if they don’t have time. The problem is I only have a small cohort of people I use and I don’t know how many follow through. Likely none. Still, this is a great tactic.
If I see a bit of news where a white person is physically attacked or has their authority attacked by a POC, I find their contact and write them a message of support if they stand up to it. Several times I have had responses where they thanked me and said my message gave them great encouragement as they were under a barrage of attack on their position and being called racist. Most of them are typical CivNats who don’t understand what time it is, yet. Still, they appreciate a kind word and a message that tells them that they are not alone, an army of us supports their courage and strength to stand up and thanking them for taking up the existential fight for our people. In other words, expressing support for them in a difficult hour in a way which opens their eyes to the magnitude of the situation is a very effective way to open their eyes.
The list of companies who are being started by and for our folks is growing. Many have excellent products and service to support them. I think mass mailing this list is a good idea.
Recently an Amazon competitor went public. We should definitely support such things. They have one of the most encouraging job descriptions I have ever read: https://publicsq.com/careers?gh_jid=4035927007
A huge part of our propaganda effort is not just fighting the people who hate us, but supporting our people who are caught up in the fight.
The Public Square IS a great initiative that pro-whites should make the most of but be aware that it seems to be a product of the “Conservative movement” with the usual suspects promoting it. It would be an interesting experiment to see if the website would allow and open WN to sell products on it.
But at the very least, it is a great way for pro-whites to engage in commerce.
Definitely share it around.
“For one thing, they have an arsenal of race denialist talking points . . .”
The Thuletide site you link to (“Debunking Race Denialism”) is packed with useful info. Thanks.
An idiot’s guide to basic statistics (e.g., a simple explanation of “one standard deviation”) could be a bonus.
In terms of spreading out content and ideas I have a strong suggestion to Counter Currents, Amren, Patriot Front, National Justice Party etc. Please upload audio files of podcasts, monologues, speeches and interviews direct to your Telegram channels.
Obviously keep putting them in all the other usual places but put them up as audio files on Telegram as well.
It is way easier to send them around to various group chats and channels
It is more convenient to download and listen to them offline.
Thanks, this is a good idea.
On more than one occasion I have had the following conversation with members of the Mainstream Right:
Me: “One reason the Left has gained such ascendancy is because they have a vast propaganda [aka agitprop, PSYOP, Info War] apparatus.”
Mainstream Rightist (gleam in eye): “Wait a minute, we have [insert names of various conservative podcasters, rightwing talk radio host, Beltway think tanks, etc.].”
Me: “Then why does the Left continue to maintain its ascendancy?”
Mainstream Rightist: “Uh…”
There appears to be an assumption that passively consuming information-product amounts to change in the real world. But the Mainstream Right strategy comes down to: (a) buy advertisers’ products, (b) vote conservative in the next election, (c) tune in for more programming.
Many Mainstream Conservatives identify by what they watch as opposed to what they do. To use a certain metaphor, it’s like they confuse passively watching the shadows on the walls of their caves with making advances in the real world. Au contraire, Leftists just don’t do propaganda, they take it to the streets and boardrooms where they change policies.
On rare occasions some kind of Mainstream Right activism does appear to take effect (such as the recent boycott against a certain beer company). But such actions do not translate into a wider movement because once a battle has been won it’s back to 500 channels of cave wall shadows.
This is one reason that the Dissident Right punches way above its weight. Probably the single best tactic is the use of the Red Pill meme. There’s a sense of being part of a wider movement, whether it’s by participating in online meme wars or engaging in flyering campaigns or flash mob demonstrations or White art collectives. There’s an end state towards which activists work: the White Ethno-State.
Are there any update on the policy institute?
Big announcement coming next week.
Interesting and suggestive article, as always, Beau. I don’t disagree with anything you wrote, though my focus is totally different. For Americans (I have very different views on the European situation), our goal should be to develop ways to bind white nationalists together sociologically, almost to the extent of Hasidic Jews, or at least Mormons, and ultimately geographically. We need to become, in a sense, our own ethnoreligious group searching out our (White) Zion. I think this was the idea behind both Christian Identity and Pierce’s Cosmotheist National Alliance.
Of course, we probably don’t need to be all that religious. I would participate in the building of the Ethnostate despite my own religious scepticism. It would be a joy just to spend my final years around my own people (who are not mere racial whites, but prowhites). The point is that the Ethnostate is not going to arise spontaneously out of theory; it must have a solid WN “social nucleus” into whose orbit more indecisive and hesitant types can gravitate. And that nucleus must be located at the heart of where a future Ethnostate could reasonably be foreseeable, once a general national collapse is in the offing, and ethnostatist secession suddenly becomes viable.
That sounds pretty good to me. Still, the first step towards that is raising our consciousness. Once that occurs, we’ll be much closer toward being a cohesive community. A lot of other possibilities will unfold too.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.