Counter-Currents
3,871 words
In a previous article, I explained how it has become undeniable that America has died in spirit. But the flip side of such a gloomy outlook is actually quite cheerful. We cannot save “our nation” if we mean the old United States, but we can save “our nation” if we mean to shelter, guide, and nurture the beginning of a new nation that is completely different from the old in its essence, even if it may entail some external trappings from the old world.
I believe that we on the Dissident Right, along with eugenic “normies,” are not just a new nation, but the progenitors of an entirely new cultural/civilizational cycle as described by Oswald Spengler. This makes us the first men of the first nation of an entirely brand-new culture. It’s a daunting prospect, but one that we can face with a “brave optimism” that is free from cowardice if we approach it with a realistic outlook and with a focus on long-term success rather than the turbulent ups and downs of the short term.
I remember seeing a flier from Identity Evropa which contained the lines “Our generation, our future, our last chance.” That flier has turned out to be true, but not in the way many had hoped. The Alt Right, with its millennial idealism and synergy with Trump’s 2016 campaign, was our last chance to save the old Faustian West. The zoomers are too nihilistic, ironic, and burnt out, and to their credit they must operate under a soft totalitarian state which came about as a consequence of their elders’ decadence. But all is not lost, for the chill of Faustian civilization’s deep winter precedes the strident spring of a new culture, and the death of the America spawned in 1776 is necessary for a more virile America to arise.
A brief overview of Spengler’s historical cycles might be helpful. Cultures are based upon a “world feeling” which is a sense of space and time. This world feeling then drives everything else in that culture, from math to art. Civilizations are cultures that have become old and rigid. Cultures usually encompass several sub-units; for example, Athens and Rome were both part of the broader Apollonian culture that was based on a sense of perfect bodies. Egyptian culture was based on a sense of a procession through time, the Middle Eastern Magian culture is based on a duality of spirit and body as well as a sense of the world of a cavern, while Western/Faustian culture is based on a yearning for infinite space.
What might this coming culture’s world feeling be? My guess is that it will be based on a sense of time as a cycle, with cycles within cycles. While most other cultures had a cyclical sense of time, it was still not their world feeling. Spengler proclaimed that Faustian civilization was the first to achieve a bird’s-eye view of history, and would likely be the last. I disagree, as his ideas have filtered down to the rank and file of our movement, even if only on the level of memes. Of course, a world feeling does not come from intellect and books, as intellect rules late-stage civilization, while the spring of a culture is an instinct arising from blood. I suspect that Spengler was more than just the prophet of Faustian civilization’s fall, but also the first prophet of a new culture. He even predicted that the next cultures would be born in America and Russia. It is fitting to name the hypothetical new culture that is germinating in America the Spenglerian culture in his honor.
You can buy The World in Flames: The Shorter Writings of Francis Parker Yockey here.
Let’s examine some of the characteristics of this Spenglerian culture. It will have a sense that everything has a place, because a cyclical view lends itself to seeing that most things have a time, which naturally also means a place. It will also be entirely comfortable with the reality that life is unfair, that men are not born equal, and that even if they were, equal outcomes are neither possible or desirable. The men of this culture will hear as much joy as sorrow in Carl Orff’s “Oh Fortuna,” if not more. They will sense that if sorrow is ever the afterpart of joy, then the opposite must also be true. To use military parlance, this culture will know how to “embrace the suck” and laugh at it.
This means that the West’s grand moralizing crusades such as Prohibition and Black Lives Matter will never come about in this culture. All of these silly moral crusades aimed at completely eradicating some perceived ill that was unique to the Faustian culture as such a crusade extend morals into infinity no matter the cost, until nobody ever drinks a drop of alcohol or commits any act of racism ever again. Spenglerian culture will have the wisdom to understand that even some vices have a place. There will always be seedy parts of town which serve to corral certain behaviors and persons, as trying to eradicate them only backfires and ironically allows them to spread. And if it is understood that individuals, like nations and cultures, must ride the wheel of fortune, then utopian visions that try to perfect society so that nothing bad ever happens to anyone will never be able to take hold. The common people would find such utopias and crusades to be inherently repulsive, even if they cannot fully articulate why.
Spenglerian culture will also be marked by balance and sustainability — but in actuality, unlike the fake environmentalists of the current day who use sustainability as a buzzword to advance the Great Reset agenda. This inherent instinct will be further honed by practical necessity, because by the time that Spenglerian culture ascends, Faustian civilization and Jewish greed will have wrecked a great deal of the planet in both its beauty and resources. Being in its youth, Spenglerian culture will have the creativity to find ways to become sustainable. Even apart from greed and controlled opposition, attempts at sustainability under the sway of Faustian civilization are doomed to fail because such attempts are inimical to its yearning for infinity in all things to include infinite growth and exploitation, and because civilizations in their winters are senile and not creative. Guillaume Faye’s book Archeofuturism offers some insights into how a synthesis of technology and traditional living could achieve sustainability, but I suspect that our descendants will find ways that would pleasantly surprise even him. Nuclear energy, despite being Faustian in essence, will most likely be well incorporated into efforts at sustainability because it is ironically the “greenest” energy option available.
Spengler predicted that some technologies would be used less or even lost because they were so tied up with the Faustian world feeling, such as electricity. I disagree about electricity, as it is useful, and through nuclear energy can be made mostly sustainable. However, it is likely that at least some technologies will be lost or regress in sophistication, as they do not correspond to the Spenglerian world feeling and thus will not be as intuitive to future scientists. Take how the US Air Force today has to reverse engineer some of its B-2 stealth bomber parts. While diversity and dumbing down probably has something to do with it, a subtler reason contributing in the background might be how the desire to propel forward into infinite space has finally burnt out in the modern Western scientist, even among the white and German ones.
One technology that will probably be lost is that of modern health care. This profane mix of mad science experiments aimingto prolong the body’s existence for as long as possible is inherently Faustian and the antithesis of a Spenglerian sense that all things, even death, have their appointed time and place. This rejection of modern health care will be even further exacerbated by memories of the transgender industrial complex and COVID hysteria. Future medicine will likely be holistic and focused on a healthy diet and exercise, with medical procedures reserved for broken bones and the like. Strong taboos will likely arise against progressing further in these matters beyond basic surgery and natural medicines.
Another technology that might be used less is cell phones, as cellular communication allows communication to conquer infinite space in a few seconds, and so is uniquely Faustian in nature. A Spenglerian man would sense that there is a time for communication and a time for silence. He would not need constant, real-time updates from Internet friends, and even less from employers. We may already be seeing the genesis of a distaste for cellular technology in the extravagant BitChute fairy tales about 5G making people sick. Regardless of the scientific truth about 5G, the masses have hit on an important truth in their subconscious which they are struggling to articulate in their conscious minds. 5G, and really all cellular technology, does make us sick — but it is a spiritual sickness. We need only look at the whores of OnlyFans and Tinder to see this. Other examples are children developing developmental problems from too much screen time, and the generic negative effects of social media. Social media is Faustian, as it is a projection of the self into infinite space at the cost of dissolving oneself into that space, and so the Spenglerians will probably see social media as an unappealing chore.
The new culture will also have little interest in designing complex legal and political systems, even in its latter stages of development. A cyclical view accepts that circumstances change, and so any man-made law except for the most basic will eventually become unjust, or at least impractical. Their legal and political battles will be focused on culture, tradition, and concrete effects more than abstractions. The Spenglerians will probably look back on Faustian legalism and constitution-building as ridiculous. Why should a statute last any longer than a sand castle? Why build a complicated system of checks and balances that can always be subverted instead of inculcating virtues that can survive the ups and downs of politics? What is the commerce clause compared to national honor? A seasonal culture will know deep reverence for the dead, as death is part of the cycle of human life, but it will never accept nor even comprehend le mortmain, the tyranny of the dead over the living, and especially in the handing down of convoluted constitutions.
Assuming it exists, what exactly is the current state of the Spenglerian culture? The only place it can fit within Spengler’s system is in the earliest days of its pre-cultural period. This would be analogous to the Mycenean age for the Apollonian culture and the “dark age” Franks before Charlemagne for the Faustian. This is the time of tribes and chieftains and is devoid of high politics. This is also the spring when foundational myths are formed, such as Homeric heroes for the Apollonian and saintly hagiographies and knights’ tales for the Faustian.
Much of this myth-building is yet to come, and yet I suspect that some foundations are already being laid down. The interwar writers could very well become exalted as something along the lines of great prophets and myth-makers, with Spengler at the forefront. Of course, the common man of Spenglerian culture and especially in its early phases will only have a meme-level understanding of the great interwar writers, but that is perfectly fine, as the level of memes has usually been the level of understanding of the common folk. This meme understanding does not prevent them from experiencing a world that is full of meaning, and perhaps even enhances meaning, as it avoids over-intellectualism. A higher understanding which most people would find boring anyway can always be reserved for those who are interested in it.
Spengler wrote at great length about how world feeling affects a culture’s math, such as how fractions reflected the bodylines of the Apollonians, because those numbers always referred to a fraction of a real body, unlike Faustian decimals, which are abstract and can in theory go into infinity. I profess I have no clue of what a Spenglerian mathematics would look like, but music is adjacent to math, and we may already be seeing a hint of Spenglerian influence there. Consider how phonk, a type of music based on car culture, is extremely repetitive — some prime examples are “Phonky Town” by Playaphonk and “Never Existed” by Lxst Cxntury. The lyrics are mumbled and almost impossible to discern, usually accompanied by a heavy beat, although some phonk music is smoother. Some critics might charge that phonk’s repetitiveness reflects the lack of imagination evident in soulless pop music, but I would argue that this repetitiveness is indicative of a Spenglerian sense of cycles. The repetitiveness actually enhances what little change does occur in a phonk song, as it stands out more. Martial industrial music shares the same creative repetitiveness and is still generally liked by the movement. Martial industrial and phonk are in part appealing because their aggression serves as an alternative to the sissy pop music of the current year, but might some of their appeal also be driven by how they speak to the world feeling of a new culture?
You can buy Greg Johnson’s From Plato to Postmodernism here
Spenglerian culture will also be strongly influenced by the pseudomorphosis that it is undergoing. A pseudomorphosis in geology is when one mineral forms naturally but then breaks apart, leaving a cavity. A second mineral then forms in its place, but instead of having its own geometric form that reflects its atomic makeup, it is forced to assume the form of the first mineral (petrified wood is a common type of pseudomorphosis). Spengler observed that the Magian culture developed for centuries under the dominance of the Apollonian culture, with Christianity as one expression of the Magian soul having to assume the outward forms of late-stage Greco-Roman paganism to find acceptance. When Magian culture finally asserted its true form through Islam, it did so violently, because its energy had been pent up for centuries and was unable to find authentic expression. This explains Islam’s rapid militaristic expansion and its extreme iconoclasm, which at its core was a hatred for the Apollonian reverence for perfect bodies — not because the Magian world feeling was particularly opposed to the Apollonian world feeling more than other cultures per se, but because it had to live under the shadow of a burnt-out Apollonian empire.
Like the Magians, Spenglerian culture is forced into an awkward pseudomorphosis by having to live under the dominance of the Faustian culture and conform to its outward forms, which does not suit it any more than its underlying values. For all our talk of being Faustian, is that world feeling really ours? Our political and cultural expressions are expected to conform to those of the Enlightenment, specifically those of 1776, which was an example of late-stage Faustian civilization taken to an unhealthy extreme, as evidenced by the American Revolution’s foundation on utopianism, hyper-individualism, rationalism, and supposedly eternal and universal principles — which for whatever reason scarcely existed before the Enlightenment. 1776 still speaks to the boomers and libertarians, but not to the movement — beyond gun rights and free speech, which are inherent to European blood, anyway.
What does speak to us is the Confederacy and, optics be damned, the Axis powers. The Confederacy was an agricultural country and thus closer to the cycles of the natural world, in contrast to the North with its Faustian industrialization and frantic exploitation. What if the American Civil War was not about muh slavery of the liberals or muh states’ rights of the classical liberals, but rather of an initial clash between Spenglerian and Faustian culture? While both the Axis and Allies relied heavily on industrialization, the Axis pursued quality and the Allies quantity. Japan created elegant battleships such as the Yamato that were destroyed by mass-produced bombers, and the Germans marvelous but impractical Tiger tanks that were outmatched by the inferior but numerically superior American Sherman tanks. The Axis pursuit of quality which was oftentimes so impractical as to suggest an inner compulsion reflecting a tendency towards hierarchy, and thus a more traditional world feeling, which while not particularly Spenglerian is still at odds with the Faustian world feeling. The Communists and capitalists of the Allies did what they do best in war, culture, and economics: drown quality in a tide of mass-produced quantity that is spawned by the Faustian tendency towards infinite production, consumption, and growth.
What this means is that the American Civil War and the Second World War may end up as foundational myths for the coming Spenglerian culture. The Dissident Right’s veneration of the Confederacy and the Axis powers is not to be seen as “edgy” or contrarian, although a lot of individuals certainly enjoy being edgy and contrarian. This veneration at its root is driven by the fact that we share a common Spenglerian world feeling with them. We should not nostalgically lament Dixie as “gone with the wind,” but seek to propel it forward to rise as the first nation of a new culture. These great wars are already being mythologized in our minds, and our descendants will likely look at them as their Iliad and Aeneid. The Second World War was the Europe’s “last battle,” but also the first battle of a new nation that will likely arise from the detritus of the United States in a modern version of translatio imperii, similar to how the flame of Rome passed to the Holy Roman Empire and how that flame was originally carried to Rome from the ashes of Troy. If this happens, it will also make it likelier that the interwar authors will be revered as prophets, as discussed above.
What will religion in the Spenglerian culture be like? That it will be religious is undeniable, as all cultures have a strong religious impulse in their youth, and this religious impulse will be further enhanced by how atheists are culling themselves through disproportionally low birthrates. It is likely that Christianity will be the dominant religion based on current trends, which is interesting, as this will be the fourth culture that Christianity will have lived in. A mystical Catholicism is likely to be the dominant sect, although it will by necessity have to break from the Catholic Church’s globalism and liberalism and declare itself the true Church, with the old Church seen as a heresiarchy, much as the rise of a Faustian/Gothic Christianity drove the Great Schism between the West and the Magian East. It is unlikely that outright reincarnation would be adopted in this Spenglerian Christianity, as it is too much against the black-letter word of the Bible. It will have to express the cyclical world feeling another way, perhaps in seeing history as Herodotus did in his account of the Greco-Persian Wars — that is, as driven by an invariable rise and fall of nations according to God’s will, with nations dramatically falling a step away from achieving total dominion because they overextend and become blinded by pride. This would make the Spenglerians fiercely nationalistic but averse to imperialism.
This new religion, even if it denied being a new religion, would invariably need to address Nietzsche’s criticisms. The harsh lessons that meekness is a recipe for slavery, that physical strength and beauty correlate with virtue, and that there is such a thing as too much peace and love will overshadow the early Spenglerians to such an extent that it will be impossible to ignore them. Their religion might incorporate this through the doctrine that there is a time and place for everything, combined with Aristotle’s Golden Mean. It is likely that a prophet-like figure will emerge who can translate Christianity into the Spenglerian culture, either through the logic of theology or perhaps by proclaiming a new revelation, as the Book of Mormon does. Machiavelli dreamed of a virile, heroic Catholicism, and it is likely that his dream will be realized by the Spenglerians, and he could even be rediscovered as a prophet. While paganism is more in line with a cyclical world feeling and will therefore probably see its numbers rise, it is unlikely to become the dominant religion again.
When and how this Spenglerian culture will assert itself remains to be seen, but it is likely going to be through a collection of towns, counties, and states that go deep “red” as America continues to balkanize. This will resemble the scattered tribes or small city-states of other cultures’ early periods. There will likely be three major regional identities based on the South, the Rocky Mountains, and the Midwest/Appalachia, much as the early Greeks were divided among Dorians, Ionians, Achaeans, and Aeolians, but still shared a common identity. There will probably not be a glorious secession all at once, but a gradual, passive aggressive secession as central authority collapses, similar to the disintegration of Western Rome.
This leads to practical advice: If we are looking at such a gradual reorganization, it is unwise to burn out in a blaze of glory, giving oneself wholly over to the movement in expectation of a quick victory. Endurance is the name of the game. Now is a great time for young white men to quietly form Männerbünde in the shadow of the decaying empire, much like the early Franks.
Building a dissident high culture, along with a low culture, will help us add both new elites and normies to our nation. Many normies are apolitical not from a lack of virility, but from an overabundance of it that has no interest in movement drama, “incels,” the GOP, grifting, or the asocial weirdos who were tolerated in the past simply because they had the right opinions. These virile normies are prime recruits who will coalesce with us through culture first and politics, second.
The first nation of the Spenglerian culture will have to be built from the ground up. While there might be no political solution, politics can still play a role in the solution. State and even national politics are still useful for protecting white resources from exploitation by enemy tribes, promoting tribalist identity politics, and delegitimizing the regime. We may do the same thing, but how we do it will change, as we will have a different why for doing it. And while running for city council may not be glorious, it will probably be a more effective option for most of us. High politics and state-building comes later in a culture’s lifecycle.
There is a tendency in the movement to declare that everyone must pack up and leave for some specific place or else hide in the woods. I partially disagree, as moving across the country is easier said than done in a bad economy, and because balkanization is happening across a number of states, counties, cities, and even neighborhoods. We have a large number of attractive options. Furthermore, isolation makes one an easy target to destroy in detail. A large variety of strong networks, communities, districts, and even states are what we should focus on building, as together they will have the strength to weather the storm of a collapsing civilization.
And eventually, whatever we manage to build or preserve are like seeds that will one day coalesce and bloom into the garden of a new nation.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
15 comments
The ‘Flame of Rome’ was not passed to the Holy Roman Empire — is the author unaware of Voltaire’s quip, or the small matter of five hundred years’ hiatus? The actual successor state, antithetical though it may be to Spenglerian Thought, was of course the Byzantine Empire.
When Irene of Athens made herself ruler of the (Byzantine) Roman Empire, the then Pope, who had recognized Byzantium as the continuation of Rome, gave the title of Roman Emperor to Charlemagne, on the assumption that a woman could not be Roman Emperor.
Absence of undue repetition is a necessary characteristic of high music. Even those great composers who use it do so in the most reserved sparing. If Spenglarian culture is doomed to produce only music of rap-like monotony, then it is doomed to produce no real music at all.
Also, there is an obvious problem with any civilization that would aspire, through design or emergent evolution, to this agrarian-Spengler model in determined contrast to a Faustian-industrial model. The results of the examples used speak loudly of it, namely the industrial model and perhaps the mode and capacity of thinking required to run it outcompetes agrarian society. The historic record is sufficiently long and varied to suggest that, given enough iterations, that the above is a natural law.
It may be that Faustian-industrial society has accreted so much of the earth through conquest and trade that it is now one tired, moribund entity, metastatic diversity rattling its final breaths. But it will die and some other will be born. Then, in the words of Don Ciccio, quando cresce, cresce forte.
Unless the new Spenglarian cultures are willing shoot the nascent Faustian cultures dead in their gardens, the game’s outcome will already be decided.
My hope is that the Spenglerians will be the most conscious and self-aware culture to have existed. Ideally they will learn from the Confederacy and Axis and understand that they must limit their natural tendency to reject mass industrial production, and therefore consciously decide to wield industry like a flame that is both useful but also dangerous. Completely rejecting industry would not be Spenglerian but Luddite, my hope is that the Spenglerians will strive for a balance in things.
If anything, the nascent Spenglerians in America should initially push for re-industrialization to achieve autarky and to reverse the mass off shoring of industry that occurred under the Globalist era lead by the Jews and late stage Faustians. However, given the state of natural resources drying up it is possible that mass industrial production may become less of a winning strategy in the coming years. In that case, a culture that can balance quality and quantity would have an edge over those that only prioritize quantity. Victory will lie somewhere between the two extremes represented by the Sherman and Tiger tanks.
If you’re going to reject mass industrial production, you may as well chip yourself a flint knife and slash your own throat with it. No one else is going to stand down and in any modern conflict, logistics is a substantial part of being able to win. This is true whether you’re talking about the armies of ZOG or the Taliban.
The Left has known for a long time that effects of ‘mass industrial production’ need to be managed in such a way as to sustain as much of the benefits (low per unit holistic environmental impact) and to reduce the adverse consequences of such production methods (pollution, worker obsolescence and displacement).
Simply rejecting modernity doesn’t work. The chief beneficiaries of the move to modernity has been ‘the Left’ and they have their doubts and concerns about it. And they’ve thought about how to fix the problems. If the Right weren’t so insular, they might learn something useful about how to retain the benefits of ‘modernity’ (from the perspective of the ordinary person). Selling people on the idea they should embrace the Right’s political platform because it ensures the ordinary people are going to have to do without the benefits of civilization itself seems to me to be a tough row to hoe.
I don’t see any reason to cripple the pro-White movement with Right Utopianism.
‘[T]his Spenglerian culture…will… be entirely comfortable with the reality that life is unfair, that men are not born equal, and that even if they were, equal outcomes are neither possible or desirable.’
How exactly does the author think that a culture can be ‘entirely comfortable’ with ‘life’ being ‘unfair’ and at the same time that culture being oriented toward solving problems.
Even Capuchin monkeys know when something is unfair and seek to remedy the situation.
The Sophists had the good sense to understand that ‘eternity’ and ‘eternal truths’ were never going to make the trains run on time and that everyone manipulates everyone else, generally for the better, sometimes for the worse.
There is no ‘outside’ to the Cave. There is no place outside history to stand to understand our situation that is not the result of revelation.
It is revelation of a vision of ‘how things are’ that will coalesce the various eddies of cultural, political, symbolic turbulence into a resonant pattern that will cohere sufficient to coordinate many minds and many lives.
Live isn’t ‘cyclic’. History isn’t ‘cyclic’.
All there is are humans moving through time exploring different aspects of the human and creating and disposing of ‘civilizations’ like a mollusk growing and then abandoning shells. Those who come after the great moment of revelation and creativity that inaugurates a new way of understanding and living are like hermit crabs who wander in to take up residence.
We are like hermit crabs who have been driven from our shells but have not yet found another.
The ancient Greeks had a profound sense that life was unfair as seen in their myths and tragic plays in which a relatively or completely blameless hero suffers because the gods will it. This never prevented those heroes or Greek culture at large from accomplishing great things. I would argue that accepting the unfairness of life actually helps men to accomplish things. They know that they will get hurt by life and don’t care. Life is struggle.
In contrast, cultures and individuals that unduly prioritize avoiding harm instead of “embracing the suck” have a tendency towards cowardice that paralyzes their will. And those who are always trying to solve problems instead of knowing when to accept or mitigate with them with grace invariably find themselves trying to solve problems in which the cure is worse than the disease, such as Prohibition, Communism, etc. There is an ideal middle ground between a passive acceptance of everything and a Faustian-Progressive moral busy body. I would hope that the Spenglerians have the wisdom to know that there is a time to rage against genuine outrages and a time to accept certain realities of life.
If the Greeks accepted unfairness as normal, they wouldn’t care if events were ‘unfair’. But they did. Furthermore, the legends are advocating unfairness, which is what I perceive you to be doing. Advocating unfairness as central to a movement’s political message seems to me a mistake. Like so many mistakes by the Right over the years. It’s one of the reasons I don’t think the White race can embrace Right politics as a significant part of any pro-White political solution. There’s just no constituency for it. Which is why the Right loves to talk about how history is made by ‘elites’ with the seemingly tacit assumption that the Right either is that elite or contains that elite.
What you call ‘harm reduction’ the rest of us call civilization. Which is why the Right likes to emphasize ‘culture’ and ‘alive’ and ‘civilization as ‘dead’. Spengler lived during a time when all of the old ways were being pushed aside by a very successful movement that thrived on the mistakes of the Right in defending the palpable unfairness of the ‘old way’.
The Right advocates for things like ‘unfairness’ because it makes them look tough and strong, values that it admires, but modernity thrived on offering an amelioration of unfair conditions. It cannot make all things ‘fair’ but it sells the dream of doing so. The Right cannot sell the opposite and hope to win any argument.
Unlike ‘fairness’, ‘unfairness’ does not sell itself.
What I meant to say is that the ‘Greeks are not advocating unfairness’ in their legends.
Nobody is advocating unfairness, certainly not the great minds on the “Right.” I think you are engaging in a straw man bashing. What the author, and men of the Right advocate is acceptance of reality (i.e. life is unfair), not because they want to “look tough” but because they believe it’s the only honorable position one can hold, doing the opposite being a form cowardice.
I don’t really buy this. A new cultural cycle could only be identified by its visible cultural forms, such as in music, architecture, art and so on, and there really is a paucity of examples in this article (the reference to “phonk” as an example of a new musical form cannot be taken seriously). A new cultural cycle in the Spenglerian sense would be like an explosion, and its expressions would be notable everywhere, even though the prevailing orthodoxies might try to repress them. But we do not see this. All we see that is not mainstream is better described as reactionary than as expressions a new world feeling. All I see is the protracted death throes of a decrepit civilization, not the birth of a new one. Similarly the description here is of reactionary tweaks to the existing dying order rather than something new. There has been nothing new in music, art, or architecture, for decades. A new cycle cannot be forced, but it will emerge in its own good time.
You make some good points, but the lack of strong indicators is because the Spenglerian culture is in the earliest stage of pre-culture. This would correspond to the 500-900s for the Gothic culture, and the clues we have will by their nature be primitive, scarce and obscure. It is like if we took the wandering Germanic invasions of late antiquity and the Mausoleum of Theodoric in 520 AD and then tried to identify a world feeling behind them and then predict how that nascent world feeling (assuming we even got it right) would express itself as it blooms. Predicting the Palace of Aachen, Notre Dame, the crusades, the telegraph and the lunar landing based on those clues would require as much instinct and luck as intellectual rigor.
There are several other indications of Spenglerian culture which I did not include such as battle royale video games like Fortnite, crypto currency, economic cycles, and fantasy literature. I might write a book on the subject to explore it in greater detail. Even if my predictions are all wrong I would hope that their failure would help the coming zeitgeist to express itself.
Crypto is surely a reactionary expression of a mercantile, technocratic, Faustian spirit. Not sure about the others but I wince at the difficulty of presenting them as expressions of a new world feeling rather than simply expressions of this mercantile, materialistic world.
If you are a planning a book I have another objection which might interest you. It is that Spengler himself is the ultimate Faustian man, and his work is essentially Faustian – Spengler himself stands outside of all history, making repeated pronouncements on how nobody before him had understood history as well as he, for he has to rise above all cultural cycles to be able see their forms. In many ways he is a 20th century Faust. And therefore a new cultural epoch, if it was truly new in the Spenglerian sense, could only look with incredulity and probably contempt at Faustian spirit of The Decline of the West. They would certainly consign such a book to the flames, for any non-Faustian people would find the idea of stepping outside of history incomprehensible, hubristic, and absurd. Whatever their world feeling, it will not permit Spengler’s foray into a space outside of all peoples, all cultures and all of history. To do this is essentially Faustian. Rather, they will be fully rooted within a world view and a world picture, as all peoples and cultures are except one, the Faustian one. Indeed this is also the proof that we ourselves are still Faustian people, for we too could hardly comprehend adopting such a world view, and certainly could never be at home in it. For good or ill we belong to this Faustian world and only a truly Faustian person can take seriously a project like The Decline of the West.
“We should not nostalgically lament Dixie as “gone with the wind,” but seek to propel it forward to rise as the first nation of a new culture.”
A man after my own heart. A thoughtful addition to your series, Mr. Steuben. There seems to be something both “Faustian” and “Cyclical” about a yearning for the final demise of one culture and the efflorescence of something wholly new and virile to take its place and save us, but I think your ideas/Spengler’s thoughts on technological man are important. It is the great tragedy of history that a yearning for the infinite through math, technology, maps, and that expansive impulse has made whites more magnificent and vulnerable than any race before it.
You mention phonk music, for it’s repetition and cyclical qualities. I immediately wondered what you might think of Dungeon Synth, a far more Western-sounding, Western-oriented, Romanticist, Reactionary, and still very repetitive and cyclical genre. It is also a relatively new musical genre. It can be traced to some mid-1990s artists, but it’s surge in popularity is very current. The artists even typically release their work on cassette tape, partly out of nostalgia, but I think also out of homage to a slower, more intimate, and less accessible material culture. It’s anti-pop. Check out Dungeon Synth Archives on YT for copious examples, if you’re unfamiliar.
Dungeon Synth has to be the most “Spenglerian” musical genre out there right now.
You did mention also Martial Industrial music. Dungeon Synth has many shared characteristics and influences. Neo-folk too.
But then of course, why not Black Metal, from which Dungeon Synth arguably sprang forth, or the entire supergenre of heavy metal more generally?
Then again, when we add in modern fantasy and much of traditional science fiction I begin to wonder if we’re not ultimately looking at the cultural output of Romanticism and Reaction (1770 – Present). It seems like you would have to make the argument that the Romantic/Reactionary undercurrent/countercurrent in Western Civilization, and everything that has entailed, is NOT the “protracted death throes of a decrepit civilization” but the birth pangs of a new one.
Perhaps it can be both.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment