2,660 words
Late to the party
There seems to be a political axiom whereby it is clear that a party or its leaders are in trouble when they start doing things, or at least start talking about doing things, which the majority of people actually want done. Thus, we see Angela Rayner, the blowsy Deputy Shadow Prime Minister, “talking tough” (translated from politico, that means horse-shitting) on crime. Ms. Rayner recently called Tories “scum” on social media. I don’t know where she thinks these mythical Tories are, but they certainly aren’t in the Conservative Party.
For their part, the government have decided to launch a “war on woke,” and will doubtless say they are listening to the people, even though some of us have been scribbling about this on the asylum walls for years. But the media won’t stop banging on about illicit government parties and birthday cake, and so they must be distracted like kittens when someone flickers a flashlight beam across the carpet. If we can’t have a war on Russia — this week — then a war on woke will do.
The great unwashed must have the truth, and the Conservatives are not afraid to stand up and tell the good people just what they think of this impertinent “cancel culture” of which we hear so much. It’s just they haven’t dared to say so in the United Kingdom yet, instead dispatching Minister without Portfolio (a sort of freelance idiot) Oliver Dowden for a Stateside vacation, as well as to say as much in a speech to the Heritage Foundation in Washington, DC. Perhaps it would have been better to speechify in a country unprotected by a First Amendment. Like your own.
Boris Johnson also threw the rabble a few bones to chew in the shape of dropping COVID restrictions on the principle that “we have to learn to live with the virus.” Well, as the young people say so amusingly, duh! It was only ever a bad ‘flu, not an alien invasion or Putin’s Mensheviks or the Black Death. What Johnson is trying to do, however, is what all world leaders are trying to do, which is keep the disaster-thon going. His comment, again in translation, means “you have to learn to live with our increasingly hard soft totalitarianism.” Or, as another blonde poseur (poseuse?) once almost said, don’t let them eat cake.
Dick out
A bad month for saucy sub-editors saw the defenestration of The Chief of London’s Metropolitan Police Force, Cressida Dick. A lesbian steeped in cultural Marxism, Ms. Dick was wholly inappropriate for the job, which made her perfect for the requirements of the anarcho-tyrannists who wish London’s streets to be violent and threatening. After five years of rising street crime, an obsession with online policing, a worship of gay pride and transgenderism, and generally a talent for covering everything in woke tinsel, Ms. Dick was finally ousted under pressure from the equally odious Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan. There seemed to be crossed wires, however. Ms. Dick, having announced a day previously that she had no intention of quitting, was clearing her desk next day.
Cressida Dick was a wholly useless head of the Met. And that was the idea. Everyone knew from the start that she was an affirmative action (gender/sexual preference division) hire. The job is, or was, almost unbelievably important, dictating as it does the style of policing a major capital which at the moment is less West End and more Wild West. A good, tough, male, grizzled old cop is what is needed to grab London by the scruff of the neck and shake it but, of course, if it’s anarcho-tyranny you are wanting, the last thing you need is the type of efficient policing a good cop would bring.
Pink supremacy
Peppa Pig is a jolly little cartoon character much loved by British children. She is also a racist. Her most recent escapade, Peppa Goes to Ireland, sees Peppa and her family visit the Emerald Isle, which is when things start to go wrong for porcine-Irish relations:
Outraged Irish parents have criticized a book in which Peppa Pig journeys to Ireland — insisting it is ‘offensive’ and ‘horrendous’ . . . [as] it features no Irish characters and [features] stereotypes such as Peppa’s family purchasing fiddles and attending an Irish-dancing festival.
Peppa’s really done it now. The Irish will forgive Cromwell first. No Irish characters? Get used to it, that will be parts of Dublin soon if your country continues its attempts to turn the Fair City into the Third World with Guinness. As for the buying of fiddles and the dancing of festivals, faith and begob, if that isn’t racial stereotyping, then yer man doesn’t know what is.
You could never trust Peppa. She comes from a nuclear family, for a start, what with Mummy and Daddy Pig and her little brother, George. The publishing company’s assiduous but worried sub-editors are now looking for any potential trouble with their next publication, Peppa Goes to Mecca.
Don’t let trash in!
At last, a heart-warming story of just how far the UK will go to make brown people feel at home. Between 2017 and 2019, Britain sent thousands of tons of waste to the cheery island of Sri Lanka, purveyor of the tea the British so enjoy. The containers were billed as containing “mattresses, carpets and rugs,” and Sri Lankan customs officials were told a tall tale in which a company had agreed to take the waste in order to recycle and sell the mattress springs and stuffing. Not exactly yelling out “invest in me!”, that business plan, but it got worse when the containers were inspected: “[I]n reality, [the containers] also contained bio-waste from hospitals, including body parts from mortuaries . . .”
A couple of considerations. Quite apart from all those self-assembly cadavers who have now made an unexpected trip in the afterlife to what used to be Ceylon, turning up mistakenly labelled as mattresses (anyone know if the Sri Lankan word for “mattress” is a bit the same as “corpse”?), “the containers were not chilled and some of them gave off a powerful stench.” I smell the new imperialism.
Sri Lanka, however, has put its elegant brown foot down. Cricket they liked, bits of dead British people not so much. The government is taking legal action to have the waste returned to the UK, presumably on the principle that Sri Lanka should not have to allow trash from far-off countries to travel across its borders. There is a lesson there somewhere.
Neurodiversity training
Britain’s Fourth Estate has long seen itself, in terms of governmental policy and its dissemination, as Mother’s little helper. It is natural, then, that a part of the provisional wing of our rulers called News UK has created something called The Disability and Journalism Forum. These good people have organized a symposium in which, they hope, “leading disabled journalists [will] come together to discuss a variety of topics.” This all sounds wholesome until the mission statement takes a dip into sci-fi, as these topics are said to range from “how to better attract and retain talent to how neurodiversity can benefit newsrooms.”
As we English tend to say in times of incredulity, come again? Neurodiversity? Sorry if I am behind the curve, but I couldn’t Google quickly enough:
Judy Singer, a sociologist who has autism, started using the term ‘neurodiversity’ in the late 1990s. It refers to the concept that certain developmental disorders are normal variations in the brain. And people who have these features also have certain strengths.
Uh-oh. Turns out “disability” is not that guy in accounts with the robot leg, it’s your line manager with Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Including “neurodiversity” under “disability” means a big hello to psychological disorders, including Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). So, it seems the boss of your average newsroom can stop worrying about whether the wheelchair ramp reaches the water-cooler and reach for his copy of DSM V to see what he might expect at the next interview. Judy Singer sounds an unintentional note of warning by talking about “neurominorities.”
This does no service to those who have lost limbs or have other physical disabilities. Put simply, psychological disorders are not physical disabilities, and the two ought to be kept separate. They present wholly differing sets of logistical problems, and will encourage sectarianism as the physically handicapped do not, generally, tend to whine about victim status or use their disability as an excuse. They are just not very good at victimhood. And they should not, therefore, be bracketed with those suffering from an ever-increasing range of psychologically dysfunctional conditions, all fully sanctioned (meaning encouraged at diagnostic level) by the pharmaceutical companies. Those with autism, I have noted, are often only too happy to let you know all about it, and I once heard a woman describing her daughter’s supposed Asperger’s Syndrome (which the little girl didn’t have, in my opinion, but was merely poorly parented and so badly behaved as a result) as though she were parading a new Prada clutch-bag.
Also, the condescending idea that physically disabled journalists need affirmative action to get a job is rather nauseating, given the focus and resolve many crippled people will have built up in response to injury, loss, or birth defect. But, government or one of its little elves has to do everything for what it sees as victims of some cosmic unfairness, and equity is the soup of the day at all participating restaurants, which is all of them.
Scots off color
Off now to the land of heather, haggis, and hatred of the English, Bonny Scotland. Apparently, our Caledonian cousins are having a bit of a recruitment problem in their civil service. Not only are just 2.5% of its staff black or Asian (in the British sense) when a full 5% of Jocks are of the dusky persuasion, but those few token gestures are more likely to “receive less favorable appraisal markings than their white colleagues.”
Now, we all know the drill. What about meritocracy, best person for the job, I thought we were supposed to be color-blind, and so on and so forth. None of that works anymore. It is the quota and only the quota that counts. Brown the workforce if you want to stay out of the papers. Can you imagine the pressure on whoever evaluates these rankings to boost the scores of ethnic minorities? And they still fall behind. But that just means you are racist for suggesting a viable alternative explanation.
We then have the usual all-you-can-grift list of the dreadful things that have happened to colored people while serving Hibernian interests. One woman claims her boss asked her why it was that black people always played the race card. The union representing government employees claim bullying, discrimination, and racism are rife. One “victim” claims that “the culprits are still walking around.”
The likelihood, in the current Party (that’s Orwell’s Party, not the Scottish Nationalist one) atmosphere, of white civil servants doing any of these things and not expecting to unleash the whirlwind is remote, not to mention the fact that employees — particularly government employees — know that to game the system to their advantage, their best bet is to go race, every time. This is often to their financial advantage:
The findings come just weeks after The Independent [a British newspaper] revealed that a black civil servant had received a six-figure settlement over allegations of racial discrimination in Whitehall, raising uncomfortable questions over the civil service’s approach to ethnic diversity.
The approach is the same as every other white managerial body has to take: a mixture of abject fear for their continuing employment, and a coerced reverence for ethnicities the figures would suggest underperform. The uncomfortable question is why a six-figure sum is appropriate for some alleged nasty words.
Affirmative action, just as in America, jeopardizes the smooth running (such as it was) of every level of government, as appointments are made in terms of race and not as you would hope in terms of competence.
Star Trek, Boyo
With “sustainability” as one of the most sacred words of the new religion, you would expect it to affect the space race sooner or later. But who will become the world’s first sustainable nation to boldly go where only a few men and dogs and cats and monkeys and basically the animal population of your backyard have gone before? Will we see American exceptionalism striving per ardua ad astra (only now with recycling facilities), will Russia create a new Sputnik that runs on seaweed, will India’s space program convert the massive foreign aid Britain gives it every year and give us the first sacred cow in space? None of the above. Step forward the land of rugby, male-voice choirs, and Dame Shirley Bassey: Wales!
Yes, the tiny bit tacked onto Western England where they speak in a sing-song voice, eat leeks for apparent pleasure, and burn down English holiday homes is about to reach for the stars:
The Welsh government has unveiled ambitious plans to become the world’s first sustainable spacefaring nation by 2040, fueled by new initiatives including launching rockets at sea using cost-effective and environmentally systems [sic] and further investment at Spaceport Snowdonia.
Presumably the systems are environmentally friendly, but what about the social impact of a spaceship full of Taffs arriving on an alien planet? And how will sheep take to weightless conditions? We must be told!
Respecting Irish customs
And finally to Ireland (whatever is left of it after the Peppa Pig riots), or at least the bit of it which is still British. Brexit, of course, divided Ireland into a European Union country and a non-European Union country, and because the EU is what it is — a rapaciously bureaucratic leviathan designed to confound those who simply wish to trade and do their economies some good –, this has been turned into a problem.
There was never any intention — not by the British deep state, and certainly not by the EU — to let Brexit happen if it could possibly be sabotaged, and a truckload of spanners have been dropped into the works over the last five years.
The so-called Northern Ireland Protocol allows goods to pass across the borders between the two Irelands without the usual customs checks, which the EU want to see reinstated now that Northern Ireland is no longer under their ruinous auspices. This, however, means at least some presence at the border. However,
[t]he border is a sensitive issue because of the history of Northern Ireland and the agreements made to bring peace, which included the removal of visible signs of the border.
The fear is that if any infrastructure were to be installed, such as cameras or border posts, it could become a target and lead to political instability.
Sorry and everything, but the last century or so should have persuaded us that warnings against political instability in Ireland is like warning that a boxing match may lead to punches being thrown.
Now, you could be forgiven for concluding that all this political wrangling is taking place to stop Paddy having a tear-up, but this is a little unkind. Beneath it all there is the petty and spiteful revenge of the EU, who will never forgive Britain for leaving its rotting empire. If the government triggers the infamous Article 16 (go easy mentioning “triggers” in Belfast), then the border checks will cease and there will be nothing the EU can do about it — a situation they refuse to contemplate. Where Brexit is headed next is anybody’s guess. I’ll leave you with the old Irish gag about the man who was asked the way to Kildare Market and replied, “Well, if I was you, I wouldn’t start from here.”
Top of the morning to you.
The Union Jackal
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
11 comments
It is all so wretched.
Dublin, even more so than many other places in Europe today, is now a dumping ground for refuse from the Third World. The latest development is this. The 421 bed Holiday Inn in Dublin Airport is being lined up by the state to operate as an accomodation center for asylum seekers. The hotel cost more than €42 million to build and is the fourth largest hotel in Dublin.
What a parcel of rogues and traitors we Irish have as a government.
Strange how all this ‘Diversity’ is making Western European Cities resemble each other in terms of ethno-religious mix, crime and chaos.
I assume that the demographics of London, where indigenous Europeans are now a collapsing minority, is the Left’s desired endpoint for Dublin. If so that is both tragic and ironic.
‘Off now to the land of heather, haggis, and hatred of the English, Bonny Scotland.’
Ironic that ‘Jocks’ is a sneering derogatory racist term for Scottish people, eh, Gullick? Your comments are testament to that. Let’s not pretend that any hatred on this island only flows one way, from North to South, eh? We don’t hate the English, most of us, we hate your inbred genetic debris contingent in Westminster, and the parasites of the South-East of your country.
Then again, so do the Northern English – the further away you get from London the better the people become, and the Northern English are sound – so we’re hardly alone in our distaste for pompous thieving rich oafs in Scotland.
Fuck the Union.
Slainte!
Who are the “the parasites of the South-East of your country”? I know very little about the UK. I agree the Union should be dissolved (the American Union, too). Free nations require pre-political cultural stability to thrive (and even survive, long term), and such cultural stability is rooted in genetic (racial) similarity and shared history and memory. Universal ethnonational self-determination is really the key to global happiness, or at least minimizing interethnic conflicts (which are the bulk of conflicts today), as well as to the preservation of the white race and Western civ.
But would a sovereign Scotland actually be a good thing for future generations of the indigenous Scots? From what I’ve read, it seems not. Your country is very leftwing, not just in terms of rejecting Thatcherite moderate free market political economy (as well as Brexit), but in embracing seemingly every aspect of the global (antiwhite) Diversity and (anti-Christian) LGBTQ agendae. If Scotland gains independence, will it suddenly start importing even more Muslims and Africans and Hindus? The SNP does not inspire confidence in this regard. The bulk of whatever nationalist conservatism remains in the UK seems to be among the whites of England (perhaps also the Protestants in Ulster?). Indeed, for a long time now it has seemed as though English voters (esp the real ones, the whites) are mostly Conservative, but Labour gets elected due to landslides in Wales and especially Scotland (and among the colonizers). Then Labour turns around and imports yet more foreign colonists, who, however, end up overwhelmingly settling in England. Hence (I’ve been told) Scotland and Wales remain mostly white, while poor England gets the racial stab in the back.
England is the part of the UK that should be most desirous of national dissolution.
As an Englishman who has lived in Scotland for the last year, I can say that I have experienced nothing remotely like anti-English hatred. But I don’t think the charge can be without foundation. The Scottish National Party (SNP) is the governing party in (devolved) Scotland. Despite its name, it is not a nationalist party; its publicly stated ambition is to give Scotland away to Somalis, Pakistanis and any other non-whites who care to pitch up. It also leads the world in transgender ideology. What, then, could possibly be the SNP’s appeal to any traditionally-minded Scot? Bluntly, it appeals to anti-English sentiment, and has done since its inception in the 1930s. At its core is the aspiration to break away from the UK, and the idea of giving the finger to England is clearly something many Scots (45% in the 2014 referendum) find irresistible, for all that it would be a classic case of cutting off your nose to spite your face. Note that the fiscal subsidy which Scotland receives to England’s detriment (public spending is 17% higher per head in Scotland compared to England) has never attracted the ire of English voters.
England would be best off without Scotland (though I would welcome hearing Dr. Gullick’s views on this matter). I appreciate old Tory Unionist (is that the right word?) sentiment, but One Britain is finished, less by the Scots than the Islamo-colonizers. You’ve got to stop immigration, and begin rebuilding white nationalist consciousness so as to create sufficient mass sentiment for the repatriation of all nonwhites from English soil (which will probably require a civil war, Glorious Revolution, etc, but which is necessary for ethnonational survival, the only thing that really matters). Once that process has begun, a similar WN movement will arise in Scotland (one which can be supported, overtly politically, and, if need be, clandestinely militarily, by their true English brothers). The current dispensation is leading to the race-alien conquest of Britain. This is inevitable without radical change. It must be shaken up if there is to be any chance of a successful national patriot backlash.
I love this: “I know very little about the UK.” Followed by: “England would be best off without Scotland.” Hilarious. “I know nothing about subject, but my blowhard is so important, and is of such vitality to you, and myself, that I will pontificate endlessly on a subject I know nothing about.” I was actually going to answer you more at length, pointing out your inconsistencies, gaps in knowledge, snippets about how England would be bankrupt without parasite-sucking Scottish natural resources, and your tired random prejudices, but now I can’t be bothered. No point wasting erudition on an American, after all. An American, licking the arse of the English in we-are-inferior delusion. Pure comedy. You Americans never did quite get over wanting to be English, did you? And you never will.
Laughing here.
No contradictions. Everything I wrote is valid. I make no claim to expertise about the UK. But I’ve had a few British acquaintances. I was also once ‘schooled’ over a long dinner about the real situation there by an English professional nationalist working here in the US. I found him to be intelligent and knowledgeable, and my remarks are based on a) what he taught me, and b) my general reading, of which I’ve done a lot (for decades I’ve read publications like The Spectator, the defunct Right Now!, The Economist, The Salisbury Review, and Standpoint). Like most here, I know the political breakdown of the UK (eg, that most of the Tory vote is concentrated in England, and that the Scots, and especially the SNP, are multiculturalist welcomers as a rule). I also know that most of the Third World immigrants settle in England. Ergo, England would be better off without Scotland. Are you saying my understanding is wrong? Or is it that your reasoning ability is weak (as your comment indicates; if I were a “blowhard” – as you really seem to be – I would hardly modestly admit to not really knowing that much about the UK, would I?)?
And no, I have no desire to be English. I have no English blood, and I think England’s political behavior for the past few centuries has been a disaster for Europe and the white race (although I certainly admit that Britain produced many great men across nearly every profession throughout that period).
What’s wrong with the British (French, Germans, etc)? At this late date, they still haven’t awakened en masse?!
There is nearly no hope for our race. We don’t only need racial separation to survive. We need racio-ideological separation: prowhites need to separate territorially and politically from white traitors nearly as much as from other races. We need “white nationalist nationalism”, the sad recognition that only “our kind” (and those potentially “awakenable”, which seems not to include a majority of our race, especially outside of Eastern Europe – and maybe one day not even there) can be preserved. If a group is indifferent to its own collective survival, this being an entropic universe, its fate is foreordained. We – not we whites, but we prowhites – must see ourselves as our own unique ethnic group, like the Jews pre-Israel, a minority everywhere, strangers to all nations. If we live, the larger race will live (and, after a few centuries of population growth and separate ideo-cultural evolution, thrive). If we fall, however, the whole race is doomed to extinction, either by amalgamation at best, or extermination.
Neither have the Americans.
Too true, but there is no comparison. America has been sadly ‘diverse’ from the beginning. Europeans are not the First Inhabitants. We have the fallout from our own “peculiar institution”. We are, to many, a “nation of immigrants” (albeit white immigrants). English, French, etc, are not remotely similarly situated. They have ancient, ‘thick’ cultures wherein there is a total overlap between culture, ethnicity and race. They don’t have histories of “diversity” (though the race traitor-genocidalists are actively, in Orwellian fashion before our very eyes, trying to manufacture “diverse” pasts). The average European, certainly in the diversity-developing years of 1965-95, knew perfectly well what was happening to them – that they were being invaded, colonized and conquered (albeit in slowmo), and that these aliens were disrupting the transmission of ethnocultures and folkways: destroying the Englishness of England, the Frenchness of France, etc.
Yet the cowardly, duped fools, in one of the greatest acts of intergenerational selfishness in world history, did nothing – when it would have been so easy, as I myself was saying 40+ years ago! – to preserve their fathers’ lands for the benefit of their own descendants. White Americans have behaved similarly, but the Europeans had much less excuse than our leaders did.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment