Counter-Currents
886 words
I intended to write about the recent shooting in Philadelphia, but my train of thought took me to an unexpected destination. The specifics of this shooting were especially important to me because the shooter, who was a Black Muslim, openly admitted to shooting a white man, a police officer who was just sitting in his car at the time of the incident. The Black Muslim not only admitted to the shooting, he boldly and proudly claimed the shooting was in support of Islam and ISIS.
As soon as the Mayor of Philadelphia became aware of the attempted murder of one of our civil servants, he immediately spoke to the media and said: “It is terrible, and it does not represent the religion [Islam] in any way, shape, or form.” Most might agree with the new Mayor of Philadelphia, but I do not.
Recent events in Europe have taught me one thing: Islam is completely incompatible with Western values, culture, and tradition. This is not about terrorism, although it must not be downplayed in order to maintain a non-discriminatory attitude towards Muslims.
Since its inception the West has experienced, and will continue to experience, internal conflict. Before the introduction of mass immigration, these internal conflicts have been the result of ethnic tension and religious, political, ideological, and even philosophical differences. But they are our conflicts. They are our responsibility to resolve, and our responsibility alone.
Europe is like one big family, and every big family has turmoil that can only be resolved internally. I am sure everyone can identify with family dysfunction on some level. I am sure that everyone has experienced an outsider who has offered an unwelcome opinion on family matters. Regardless of how correct the outsider’s assessment may be, the most common reaction is to defend your family, no matter how dysfunctional. This is a natural reaction. There is a primordial urge to defend your family from outsiders, even if it is just from petty slander.
This primordial urge to defend what is ours is woven into our DNA. It is as natural and automatic as a heartbeat. Doing what is necessary to maintain our heartbeat is instinctual. It is beyond good and evil. This is not uniquely Western. The survival instinct is not even uniquely human. It is a necessity for life in general. But what is uniquely human is our ability to attach morality to necessity, sometimes confusing the two with our unique capacity to love and empathize.
Out of this capacity to love and empathize, liberalism was born, and well-intentioned as it may be, it is an ideology as flawed as the humans who gave birth to it. Liberalism is pure ego personified. Modern liberalism can conflate what is necessary with what is immoral. For example, taking your family’s side when an outsider is criticizing what is uniquely yours is a sign of honor and loyalty. But liberalism criticizes such motives. Liberalism has invented a morality that begins and ends with the individual and his choices, which leaves out our blood ties and instinctual love of our own.
Individual freedom is valuable. But the survival of a people is more important. And when they conflict, collective survival should come first. That said, the current immigration trends in Europe and America threaten the survival of our people. Therefore, it is both necessary and good to end immigration. It is simply a matter of Western survival. (Western civilization is the only civilization endangered by immigration.)
Liberalism itself will not survive mass Third World immigration. Liberalism is the political expression of Enlightenment Philosophy. Liberalism is an expression of Western people, and can only be maintained by Western people. When the West dies, liberalism will die with it.
Personally, I do not want to maintain liberalism, with its fetishization of individualism and equality. But I view this as a family quarrel. My ego is in check. I would not side with ISIS out of anti-liberalism. I would gladly go to war in defense of my dysfunctional family members. I would defend them until my last breath before taking the side of any non-Western outsider, especially if the future of our folk — our family as a whole — depended on it.
Europe is in our hearts, it is in our souls. We are Europe, and our political differences are a direct manifestation of European diversity. This is a call to re-awaken our survival instinct. This is an attempt to appeal to my leftist European brothers and sisters, as dysfunctional as I may find you. Are you willing to risk all of your political progress? Are you willing to risk religious tolerance? Are you willing to risk equal, women’s, and gay rights? Are you willing to risk all that you have done for your ideology, by taking the side of an outsider who holds you and your family — no matter how dysfunctional you may find us — in contempt?
We might not get along, but are we willing to destroy your entire bloodline for the sake of your own ego?
Islam is not just another politically correct victim group to signal about and coddle. It is an existential threat to whatever remains of Western civilization. Only we can make our future, but to do so, we have to make survival paramount, and we have to do it together.
8 comments
Leftists are not of our family. They have torn apart the family book record. Leftists have no problem sacrificing us. They are OK with sending us to death so we won’t bother them anymore, just as they are OK with denying us dignity and a future.
We should thank the rapefugees for showing the female traitors the consequence of their choices, before we die off.
The “European family” can only exist with conscious Whites. There is a difference between, say, an alcoholic mother, a jealous father, on the one hand, and a mother who wants to kill you so that she can give more resources to another child. (The latter case is not even a pure symbol. It actually happened, see http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/mom-kills-3-sons-give-daughter-dad-attention-article-1.2330400) If the family dispute is petty, it has to be fixed inside the family. If someone in your family wants to kill you, or is OK with sacrificing you for the benefit of an outsider, this is not petty at all and there are no more duties from ties.
What would happen if there were no more rapefugees? We would still suffer under Jewish and Leftist power. We would still have the lower end, be at least on the wrong side of the system, far at the periphery, scapegoated.
It is foolish to be a strict nationalist when such a position leads you to protect internationalists whose position basically equates with your sacrifice.
The rapefugee crisis is a good thing. Champagne socialists are living the consequences of their own choices, reality shows how right we were, and the media narrative only seems more shallow. Defend the conscious Whites all over the world, f.ck the traitors.
The real difficulties are only beginning. Politicians will attempt to spin this ‘temporary crisis’ into stricter sexual harassment laws, martial law at home, foreign invasions abroad. The journalistic rhetoric will be about Islam vs. the West, as though the West were synonymous with feminism and there were no other enemies besides Islam.
I understand your argument, but disagree with your conclusion. We must ask questions about who is responsible, what their motives are, whether they can possibly claim innocence – but in the most public way possible.
Completely agree with your comment CharlesJ. Not everyone who is White belongs to the White race, when they are actively trying to kill White males or helping to reduce our status. The AltRight in particular has a problem understanding this concept. Probably because they cannot shake the idea of equality, no matter how much they tell us they believe in hierarchy.
I can not speak for others on the AltRight, but I personally do not believe in equality. I don’t know how you extracted that from this article.
Oh, look at the damage done to the white psyche done by christianity.
‘Rapists Welcome’ – Is that photo at the top of the article real or doctored?
Doctored of course. The original read “Refugees Welcome.” Amounts to the same thing, though.
I have to say that’s it’s doctored very well.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment