Counter-Currents
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 157
Interview with Weev
Counter-Currents Radio
54:49 / 156 words
To listen in a player, click here.
To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save target or link as.”
To subscribe to our podcasts, click here for iTunes and here for RSS.
Greg Johnson interviews the legendary hacker and internet troll Andrew “Weev” Auernheimer. Topics discussed include:
- Weev’s life, education, and awakening
- White slavery
- White genocide
- Why racial tension is based on experience rather than ignorance
- Religion: from Christianity to Odinism (as a protest vote)
- Christian Identity
- The claim that he is of Jewish descent
- His ethnic background
- His exile from the United States
- His life in Abkhazia
- Weev’s printer prank
- Weev’s RACE method of conversion
- The importance of quantitative methods for testing our message
- Memes and the far Right
- Millennials
- Opera and classical music
- The importance of technology for White Nationalism
- John Robb’s Global Guerrillas and Brave New War: The Next Stage of Terrorism and the End of Globalization
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
10 comments
Gentlemen, I would like to speak to the subject of women and this movement. But, I’ll start by using an example that has a longer tradition, that of Libertarianism and why women in any numbers worth observing are not present within it. And in my opinion it is due to the fact that men continue to want to deny us legitimacy of our own minds. These same men toll the benefits of traditional roles, but the role they promote for women has as much appeal as Islam offers Muslim women. Whereas the men offer themselves the heroic and mythical role of the warrior and protector. Which seems to me to only confirm the primal male experience and their bonding rituals. It seems to be entirely lacking of a context which includes a civilization where family, community, creativity and intellect would flourish. What you have weaved for us to imagine is a group of men practicing military exercises, playing sports (or video games), and killing rivals. It sounds like nothing less than tribalism, at its worst. Nor have I ever found them promote the idea that they also must cultivate the characteristics of a gentlemen.
““Being male is a matter of birth, being a man is a matter of age, but being a gentleman is a matter of choice.” ~Unknown
Being male does not guarantee a boy will grow up to be a gentleman and the current self-absorbed culture is not likely to model or promote the qualities of a gentleman. It is a process for a boy to become a man and develop into a gentleman. Parents invest a great deal of time and resources to develop their son’s academic, athletic, or artistic talent, with little or no thought as to what is required for him to mature into a gentleman.”
Also this: http://fiercegentleman.com/manifesto/
So, to address your statement that women do not share your concerns, or have not arrived at the same conclusion with regard to the social engineering that is occurring in the West, you are sorely wrong. In my particular case, it is I, a women, who has brought these insights to my familial male counterparts. And it was a horrifying state of affairs when they blew me off as a nut case, at least initially. Of course, I did not concede because of their refutes or dismissiveness due to the fact that a number of times in the past I had been successful turning their minds to the facts of truth and undo their indoctrinated convictions. My point is: they follow me, a women, I do not follow them, because I do not trust the caliber of their critical thinking skills. Nor have they dedicated themselves to a life, as I have, to the pursuit of knowledge, truth and the cultivation of a virtuous life. Rather they have embraced a life of hedonism where appearance and consumption are the bench marks of success…no substance can be found within them. Only my husband stands apart, though he too obtains many of his insights from me, but I adored and fell in love with him because of his unerring integrity and dedication to the betterment of the lives around him. And he is no doormat, he is as firey a Celt as any man can be.
I share my thoughts with you because I, like you, want to see our people whole again, come to terms with the diabolical ideologies that are meant to destroy them. But, before that can be achieved men need to find it in their minds and hearts to broaden their understanding and vision of the entirety of what a Women is. Particularly those of us with IQs over 120.
Your view is appreciated, and I agree with you. But women have been very complicit in this whole process of degradation. The majority of women simply do not select their partners as they once did, prior to: welfare for single mothers, no fault divorce, open fornication.
If you were going to be stranded on a desert island with someone, of course you would desire a partner who was diligent, ethical, with a diverse education. Material wealth in a partner would be nice, but if it were gained unethically, then there is be a real chance that you would be enslaved or killed by them eventually. Looks, over time, would almost be irrelevant.
When the arrangement is semi-permanent with a lucrative ‘opt-out clause’, then I believe women are inclined to be a lot more adventurous than men. Men still look for motherly qualities, but one of the oldest knocks against socialism was that the State would replace the fathers, who would become expendable.
Unfortunately the degradation has been a two step. Think of fifties culture, there are a ton of bachelor movies and Playboy magazine was started. These cultural creations made women more insecure in their relationships with men. Women’s magazines have universal themes in every issue going back for decades, “he’s cheating,” “other women,” then finally divorce being promoted.
Christina Heffner the then CEO of playboy wrote and article in the 70s that her magazine has ushered in feminism in the 60s. I thought that was a bit nuts when I read it. But today, Gloria Steinem’s stint as a “bunny” seems more like a collusion publicity stunt than anything else.
Like I said before it’s a two step and big media, government etc, play men and women’s insecurities off each other masterfully,
You’re right. I remember seeing a round-table discussion from the 1980s featuring Anthony Burgess on the topic of sex. The two most offensive people, to the group and to each other, were Andrea Dworkin and a pornographer named Jim Haynes, and it became clear that both were children of the very same ‘revolution’.
This was a great interview.
I had not heard to the ‘sing a song of race war’ meme at all. Thanks.
One of the best podcasts on CC. Bring him on again and let’s talk extensively about the technical and quantitative aspects he mentioned.
By far the most important point made in this interview was the discussion on quantitative, data-driven analysis for message construction and propagation. This is an idea that some have been promoting for years. It is in fact something that Der Movement and its “leadership” should have been doing years/decades ago.
Better late than never.
I’ve had lots of experience with non-whites too. The high school I went to was over 90% black. And to this day I still work with non-whites. I also have non-whites in my family who are mixed race. None of them are mixed with negro, thankfully. Just asian and hispanic.
My worst experience has been with blacks. The school I went to was like a zoo and the other whites besides myself were either wiggers or they segregated. Majority of them segregated. During lunch period there was always the white table where only the white kids sat. The mostly white teachers who had been there for a long time didn’t even bother to teach because they knew it was pointless to try, while the newer teachers spent all day yelling and trying to get the black kids to behave. I actually witnessed one teacher have a mental breakdown during class. There were a couple light skin hispanic kids there and they tended to identify more with the whites and I think that’s because my school was so black that they basically were white in comparison.
But basically if you send a white kid to a majority black school either two things are going to happen: he’s either going to become a dumbed down wigger who talks black or he’s going to grow up to resent niggers.
“… all of these things have been adopted, they have been created, by human decisions and the idea that the leaders and rulers… the ruling castes, in all of these White societies, are adopting these terrible policies, all within a space of a few decades of one another, and… ‘they know not what they do?’. It’s not plausible.”
This is the exact argument which has the most success at efficiently removing the veil. It gently shakes the illusion loose and begins to speak to the inherent sense in the man, without the person being startled by it. It’s a very smooth change of gears in the person’s mind. For it really isn’t plausible that this global genocide of Europeans is a mere coincidence. The concept that there is no conspiracy is far more ludicrous than the idea of one. And that’s the winning ticket when you’re competing for hearts and minds. Getting people to realise that the (totally) negative outcomes of ‘multiculturalism’ are intentional and not an accident. That they are being persecuted.
Knowledge of their own persecution, in my opinion, is the most crucial factor in swaying someone’s thoughts over to our spectrum, even if it’s for the briefest of moments and even if they don’t realise it themselves. It gives them the moral legitimacy needed to internally digest and discuss thoughts which were previously forbidden. Yet it must be done subtly for it must also be done of their own free volition and that cannot be achieved if their defences are raised to that which is overtly ‘in bad taste’. For most people really are self willingly, partially oblivious to the nature of the destruction and decay in our homelands precisely because it is in ‘bad taste’ to notice this state of affairs for what it actually is. They simply want to be ‘good people’, and like ‘good people’ don’t want to think badly of others and don’t want to attach any blame to what they perceive to be an accidental state of affairs. In their own minds they are resourcefully soldiering along the enlightened and moral high-ground whilst the less astute characters (Nationalists) are simply intolerant of anyone they can possibly blame for anything at all. For that is how we are seen by a number of, especially younger, people in our societies. We are seen as the worst kind of individual in a community; ‘those who whine about an accident and blame others rather than assist in its solution’. Of course, we of the Real Right understand this is not an accident. That it is a persecution of our very existence and thus cannot be hidden with a ‘hope not hate’ slogan raised up with a multi-ethnic team spirit. It was this realisation which finally allowed us to really wonder what good can come of a malevolent intent. For almost all White people know that multiculturalism has been disastrous, they just don’t know that it was always meant to be. And so they sift and clear through the rubble, expecting the fires to burn down to cinders in their own good time, without ever searching for the arsonist amongst them. However, just put the seed of suspicion in their minds and…
Thus the current task of Nationalism is to persuade the people to think in Nationalistic terms without coining these ideas as such. They will, through common sense and a pinch of bravery, find themselves here in due time.
I think that the whites in North Africa mixed into the native population. The Mamluks even became a ruling class in Egypt.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.