1,261 words 
Read Part 1 here
The movement frequently criticizes older people for being vulnerable to Zionism, and rightfully diagnoses decades of Jewish dominance of the media, and especially TV, as the biggest cause. Once one steps back it seems odd, even from a Christian perspective, to place Israel on a pedestal as a defender of human rights, democracy, Western civilization, or whatever. Ironically, many of the people who criticize boomers for Zionism venerate Putin and Russia in much the same way that boomers venerate the Jews and Israel. This is unsurprising given how political immaturity, especially vulnerability to propaganda, has been a perennial problem in America.
A recent and embarrassing chapter of this phenomenon was when the United States Department of Justice revealed that Tenet Media had been funneling Russian money to several right-wing influencers. The DOJ might be an enemy of the people, and thus there’s a rebuttable presumption that everything they say is a lie. However, it’s still an objective fact that large sums of money were being transferred between accounts. The most notable example was Tim Pool, who was being lavishly paid $400,000 a month to produce four YouTube videos each month (For reference, the entire operating budget of Counter-Currents is $300,000 per year).
While there was no quid-pro-quo, Tim Pool was still an idiot. If a secret admirer is paying me that much for a weekly video, I’m going to ask questions. At the start of the Russia-Ukraine war, many conservative influences fell in love with Russia. Some of them may have been true believers, who due to either their well-justified hatred of the American regime or their own impotence were desperate for Putin to charge in on a white polar bear to save them. After being brutalized and lied to throughout 2020 and afterwards, many of them probably fell into simple contrarianism. Still, funding has also been a perennial problem for the movement. Given how so many influencers magically forgot about the Holodomor overnight to become fanatically pro-Russian, I suspect that some of them hoped to be financially rewarded, even if it was absent any explicit agreement.
I don’t know what Tim Pool and the other influencers were thinking, but their conduct ranged from stupid to suspicious. Even if one is pro-Russia, one must admit that they gave the American regime a handy talking point about “Russia collusion” ahead of the election. I find it hard to believe that the DOJ only recently pieced this case together. As with a lot of school shooters, I suspect that Tenet Media was on the regime’s radar. The regime allowed Russian influence to happen so they could advance their domestic agenda, and these influencers facilitated the regime’s plot through their stupidity and/or greed. While none of the influencers are being charged with a crime, the regime was able to destroy their credibility, thereby undermining whatever good ideas they might have.
An ex-KGB agent was able to convince the American right that Russia is a bastion of traditional values — despite high internal Muslim migration and HIV and abortion rates — in much the same way that Zionists were able to dupe boomers into thinking that Israel’s genocidal military is the world’s “most moral army.”
The American right abandoned Ukraine even though it is a white country fighting for its independence—and a particularly right-wing country at that. Of all the conflicts in recent history, Ukraine is ironically the only one which is justified as being in white interests.
Even more ironic is the fact that by arming Ukraine, America severely hampered its ability to arm Israel, which was a substantial reason for October 7th. More weapons to Ukraine mean fewer weapons for Israeli war crimes and an anti-white federal regime at home. The implications should be obvious.
It’s clear that American vulnerability to propaganda needs to be fixed. But how?
The most immediate solution is to cultivate a sense of “stranger danger.” I have always had a reasonable apprehension of “the other” from attending multi-racial schools and playing PC strategy games. I naturally and effortlessly see uniforms when dealing with various out-groups.
The left would pathologize this as hate or fear. They are correct, but maybe we have such instincts for a reason, whether by design, evolutionary pressure, or both. But I would prefer to call it awareness, apprehension, or “stranger danger.”
For example, one does not disparage cancer screening as cowardice. If anything, those who avoid cancer screening oftentimes do so out of cowardice, as if what they don’t know can’t hurt them. Likewise, you can choose not to see other groups, but that doesn’t mean that they won’t see and prey upon you. You can still like individuals from out-groups, and even some out-groups as a whole. I do. I also recognize them for what they are, and that their interests are different from and perhaps adverse to my interests.
The movement makes fun of older conservatives who worship Jews and Israel, and white liberals who idolize blacks and BLM. But the Dissident Right and mainstream conservatives behaved in practically the same way towards Putin.
First, these relationships are one-way streets. Blacks will never thank white liberals for being white allies, let alone defend white rights. They will only increase their demands. And Zionism is a textbook example of a one-way street.
Russian cheerleading is another one-way street. One either wrecks one’s credibility and gets nothing, or if one does get something, there’s a substantial risk it will wind up in court documents. Even if there are no criminal charges, it still undermines one’s credibility. Some of the people going up to bat for Tenet Media have rightfully asked “what about Israel and AIPAC?” Yes, Zionism is a more pernicious influence, but trading one foreign influence for another will wreck our credibility in the eyes of the people we are trying to reach.
And Putin’s disrespectful treatment of Tucker Carlson during their interview shows what he really thinks of the American right.
Groups should be defined in the affirmative based on a common identity, not in the negative based on a common foe. Hardly anyone likes Jews except for older Americans, but that doesn’t mean that Europeans should let Arabs replace them because it will trigger the local Jews. Because they are an out-group, it is against Arab interests to reciprocate, so they won’t. In another example, the colored e-celeb streamer Sneako has been making numerous pro-Haitian and anti-white posts despite regarding Jews as a common enemy. When Republicans talk about black jobs, the blacks never reciprocate and concern themselves with white unemployment, despite whites and blacks both being victims of Hispanic immigration.
Putin is undeniably an enemy of America but for radically different reasons than our own. He does not see Europeans or Americans as part of a greater race. Putin wants to exploit us in our weakened state, not make us stronger, in order to promote Russian imperial revanchism. He is anti-racist and anti-white. He probably sees us as contemptible fools for having been duped so long.
I admit I briefly jumped on the Putin bandwagon when he first invaded Ukraine, but reading Counter-Currents changed my mind. Counter-Currents is not beholden to any foreign power, be that Israel or Russia. This is because it is for and by our people. The price of not raking in $400,000 a month from shady sources is the ability to tell the truth, which is priceless. However, we still do have an operating budget. If you appreciate our independence, candor, and integrity, I would ask that you make a donation to help keep us telling the truth.
72 comments
I knew not to trust Putin when I saw pictures of him in Israel doing weird cult stuff. As you know many other world “leaders” all go do the same thing, so we trust none of them. Now what? Who’s running for office who isn’t a leftist communist or some jew worshipping cuckservative? Where do we go from here knowing nearly 100% of all the voters are in one camp or the other? Or is there another landmass up for grabs to start over on?
“Everybody who says “Russia is for Russians” is either a fool or a provocateur.”
Nice words from a “Russian Nationalist Putin”, really?
I myself was immediately skeptical of the tenet media thing. It seems obvious to me that they are trying to resurrect Russian collusion in anticipation of election time. They are trying to make it look like the Russian collusion hoax was a real thing and to restore confidence that it was “real history” and that there is an actual constant threat of Russian interference in American politics, and that this threat is predominantly through right wing populist channels. To call critics of the establishment “colluders” is the knee-jerk establishment response. For example, Hillary Clinton accused Tulsi Gabbard of Russian collusion also. The message is that if you are not critical of Russia then you are a traitor.
It’s also a strategy to quell alternative media commentators.
If you brought up the aipac analogy, they would point out that aipac’s funding in fact comes from domestic sources, not foreign countries.
And I’m doubtful that Russia would be that interested in having alternative influencers do favorable Russian propaganda. I doubt they would have much to gain from that. As the author states, Putin was hostile and off-putting in his interview with Carlson. It doesn’t seem like he wants to cozy up to us at all.
You all talk about Russian or Jewish influence and/or interference, but keep silent about CHINESE influence/lobbying/interference.
Here’s an interesting list of laws I found online:
1. Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882: Initially banned Chinese laborers from immigrating to the U.S. for ten years and barred Chinese immigrants from becoming naturalized citizens.
2. Geary Act of 1892: Extended the Exclusion Act for another ten years and added harsher restrictions, such as requiring Chinese immigrants to carry resident permits or face deportation.
3. Scott Act of 1888: Prevented Chinese laborers who had left the U.S. from returning, even if they had legal resident status.
These laws reflected widespread anti-Chinese sentiment, especially on the West Coast, where Chinese immigrants were often blamed for economic issues like unemployment and declining wages. The Chinese Exclusion Act remained in effect until 1943, when it was repealed during World War II. However, even after its repeal, Chinese immigration was severely limited under quota systems until the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which eliminated national origin quotas.
———————
Sounds to me like the country was already under control by foreign elements that sided with the communists during WWII then continued pushing their agenda especially in 1965.
The United States needs to be fully self reliant without needing China for a thing. They would have no influence without our outsourced jobs.
People who have USA flags made in China using cheap labor to sell in the USA to profit off their fellow countrymen should be harshly judged by society and ran out of town. Thankfully, if enough people decide to snatch their own destiny from the grasp of the globalists, we have a political system where we can make that happen. If the people vote to do so, those laws could be re-enacted.
I think we have two different problems. The first problem is the Chinese immigration (well, in Australia this problem is much worse than in the US), and the doubtful loyalty of the foreign Chinese. But the second is the pro-Chinese lobby which consists of non-Chinese politicians, businesspersons, scientists and scholars, artists, military persons, officials, parliamentarians/Congress members, etc. This is the topic of many Peter Schweizer’s books, for example.
I agree with you on that. I’ve also read some of your other comments and have yet to find a disagreement.
Nationalist economic policies would not allow for either of these 2 issues to exist, but since the plutocrats/international financiers/globalists/communists (call them whatever) are in control and have been for a long time, this is what we’re facing. Unfortunately the communist bloc (BRICS) is not going to be friendly to us no matter what, and as you suggested, they are deeply entrenched in our own government.
I would support very aggressive domestic policy that forces companies to return to the USA all outsourced jobs for goods sold here (this could be more granular for different industries); failure to comply could result in their assets seized, executives jailed, or even intellectual property auctioned off to companies loyal to the Nation.
I have a simplistic view of lobbying as well. It should be considered bribery and and should be a jail-able offense. Also, I support an economic system where there’s no benefit or reason to “lobby” to begin with, as jobs, money, and standard of living should be less difficult to come by.
If the ‘We the People’ are in charge of this government, then ‘We the People’ should be the ones benefiting the most from its existence.
A personal account:
I recently went a county fair in my area. There was a Filipino immigrant who was in the Army that had his back story on a poster going on about escaping his native country and how pro-America he is..blah blah blah. Well, he had all this R-party, pro-Trump, Don’t Tread on Me crap for sale that was all MADE IN CHINA. It was so hard for me not to go from item to item picking up each one and reading loudly, “MADE IN CHINA”, before setting it back down and going to the next one. I’ve also seen black grifters do the same thing. The cuckservatives really love that; it’s always a perfect time for them to bring up mlk and how much they love blacks and civil rights while buying MADE IN CHINA cheap crap from them, all the while the black grifter cashing in on these fools.
Putin and Russia aren’t perfect but they’re miles better than the ZOG American regime. They certainly aren’t doing the insane LGBT tranny stuff, and despite having Muslims in their country they clearly don’t support the DEI diversity agenda like America does.
Crucially if Russia is defeated it’s then only China left to stop the complete Jewish globohomo world domination.
Russia and Iran are both parts of the emerging Great Chinese Empire. This empire will have oil and gas (Russia and Iran), nuclear weapons (Russia and China), the two strongest armies (even if not navies) in the world (Russia and China), the breadbasket (occupied Southern Ukraine), world factory (China), big human resources (Iran, China), agents of influence, lobbies and diasporas in the whole world (Russia, China), and after Red China will take RoC (Taiwan), also more than one third of world chip production. Plus One Belt One Road. Nobody can defeat this empire, neither militarily, nor economically, and the world masters, someway wrongly called “The World Government” now is transfering the world power and functions of the world cop from the US to this Chinese Empire.
Yes, the Ukraine war only works to empower China and allow them to enter into Ukraine and Siberia. People severely underestimate how much the West/WEF crowd are in love with China. The break up of Russia serves Chinese interests and will prop up China. Ukraine is happy to side with China in the event they win. It’s a massive outside empire that has made it no secret they dream of eliminating whites completely off the earth. I think the globalist know the brown masses are fundamentally useless which shows more that mass migration was less about control and more about maliciously destroying whites and also why they understand the need to transfer control over to China. Some make the argument that China can only subsist due to the West, but China will limp along by cannibalizing it’s neighbors and Africa even with the collapse of western nations.
Lithuanian proverb: If you run away from a wolf, you may run into a bear.
There’s some truth to this article, however, the major problem here is that the author equates Russia with Putin. The two are not the same.
The European part of Russia could (and should) be a crucial part of a pan-European Union (or, Imperium) in the future, bringing in tens of millions of White people (many of them very much Nordic). To deny this most basic fact would be suicide for the already critically endangered White race.
Putin as an individual, on the other hand, is not very different from any standard “center-right” politician in the rest of Europe or America. While he has done some good things, he has also imported millions of nonwhites into Russia and is waging a needless and disastrous White brothers’ war in eastern Ukraine for the sake of short-sighted Russian civic nationalism and his own ego (not that Zelensky is any better, but that’s a different story). We all, of course, know that regional civic nationalisms (whether Russian or American) are not the same thing as a global White nationalism.
Therefore, one can certainly dislike Putin, while, at the same time, fully acknowledging one’s racial affinity with White, European Russians. Of course, a possible counter-argument is that some White Russians support Putin and some support his war in Ukraine, however, many White Americans supported America’s disastrous adventure in Iraq, which benefitted no one but Israel and caused thousands of American deaths and greatly contributed to the “refugee crisis” that has been plaguing the White countries of Europe for years now.
We all make mistakes, however, the point is to move forward into a global, White unity. Otherwise, it’s over for the White race.
Please do not confuse NATIONALISTS with PATRIOTS. A nationalist loves his/her NATION, i.e. his/her people. A patriot loves his/her STATE. Even if this State is antinational. A nationalist want to spare blood of his/her people and do not let the people bleed for some ideological, theological or territorial issues. A patriot wants only make his State stronger or bigger, and that does not matter for him/her how many of his people will die. The Russia is in hands of PATRIOTS, and Putin can be called only a patriot without any ethnical sympathies. Russian NATIONALISTS are persecuted, oppressed, prisoned, exiled and sometimes even killed.
Did the right abandon Ukraine, or did some recognize that, as in the 1941 German invasion of Soviet Russia, the conflict could become unwinnable should it devolve into a war of attrition—wonder weapons notwithstanding? Did Putin attack Ukraine for revanchist reasons in February 2022, or did he think he was acting to force an end to U.S. provocations dating at least as far back as the 2014 Euromaidan Coup which threatened to put NATO missiles in easy reach of Moscow? Ever since the Spanish-American War, the U.S. has made a habit of involving itself in other peoples’ conflicts and then acting outraged when they respond (imagined in the case of the U.S.S. Maine). Have Putin apologists been taken in by “trad Russia” influencers, or have others fallen for a mad Jewish scheme to weaken Russia involving the slaughter of a whole generation of Christians in the former Pale of Settlement (modern-day Ukraine)? While it rankles me when people rashly choose up sides in such conflicts, of greater concern are people with entirely laudable objectives like Mr. Zsutty who do not seem to fully take important historical lessons into account.
I can guarantee you that Russia was not responding to the 2014 “Euromaidan coup” because there was no coup, and the Russians know it, since this was a propaganda narrative hatched by their own agents.
Russia has had its own coups and putsches, in 1991, in 1993. No one of foreign lands has interfered, because it has been an internal affair.
That’s interesting, because I heard with my own ears a recorded phone conversation between Victoria Nuland and the US Ambassador to Ukraine a few weeks before Maidan discussing who they were going to replace Yanukovich with.
Plus, friends in Ukraine said there was definitely a coup.
Yeah, I heard that phone call with my own ears too. It was long after the Maidan started, and about two weeks before Yanukovich fled the country, and Nuland was talking about the harebrained scheme of the US and the EU to keep Yanukovich in power and diffuse the protests by creating a new cabinet drawn from opposition political parties.
There was no coup. Yanukovich became scared that he would have to answer for his crimes (billions stolen, opposition imprisoned, protesters murdered), so he fled to his master Putin for protection.
The thing that impresses me most about Russian propaganda is the shamelessness of the lies.
Yanukovich was ousted not by Americans (which role was rather weak) or Europeans. Initially the Ukrainian oligarchs (not all of them are Jews, by the way) wanted rid of him because of his not only corrupt, but also very rigid system for his personal enrichment. And yes, the population in 2014 mostly did not like Yanukovich too.
Keep Yanukovich in power? Why then did Nuland say, “Yeah, I think Yats is our guy?
She was talking about filling the finance minister role. All of this is known. Only Russian propaganda narratives pretend otherwise.
Greg’s retcon of what actually happened is unintentional humor and might well have been ghost written by Victoria Nuland.
Truly bizarre
It is an accurate account of what happened, and nobody who has bothered to inform himself can see it differently.
For some reason, everyone forgot that during these events, every time when the authorities and protesters approached a compromise that could defuse the situation peacefully, some third force provoked violence and caused the situation to escalate. Even in the last days of the so-called “revolution”, some obscure snipers shot at both the policemen and the demonstrators. It is still unknown who they were, there were different versions: Georgian mercenaries, Israeli intelligence agents, British SAS veterans, Russian special forces, but there is no answer to this day.
The snipers worked for Yanukovich.
Grazie Gabriel Matteo
I agree, a more practical common sense view, taking into account the historic perspective.
Pan-European genetic nationalism – yes, that is our political goal, leading eventually to the resurrection as well as new creation of white ethnostates. We should not propagandistically “Asianize” white Russians. But we should also support Ukraine out of a desire to keep the Asiatic elements of the Russian army out of Europe.
We don’t need to feed into this Red Scare crap. The peanuts (I think the CIA/FBI only claimed that Russia (may!) have spent 100,000 dollars on Facebook ads in the 2016 election. That’s one-millionth of AIPAC/Israel/SPLC/ADL/HIS, et al., much less China, which has copied Israeli methods and fast becoming a significant force.
Also, who cares if one takes money from the Russians if it helps one’s cause. Back in Soviet days, the Kremlin gave 1 million dollars/year in 1988 to the CPUSA. They had common goals, nationalizations, unionizations, civil rights, etc. The Soviet government also gave one million dollars to the miners union during Thatcher’s drive for de-unionization and deindustrialization. Who is the enemy here?
Whether one needs to hide it so the media can’t use it as a disingenuous weapon is another matter. In Soviet days, Gus Hall would go the Soviet embassy or roll the funds into legitimate businesses. Now everything is electronic and easy to track.
In any event, the only issue here is narrative reinforcement of the enemy. Charlotsville should have been a two week news item, which frankly all it was, but it gave the ruling class, carte blanche to censor persecute society, something impossible hitherto in American society.
Thanks to Tenet Media, the “Red scare” crap is far bigger than some Facebook ads, namely millions of dollars to be funneled to Right-wing influencers like Tim Pool and Lauren Southern.
Our movement needs an absolute ban on courting support from regimes like Russia, China, Iran, various Arab states, etc., for the simple reason that it can be used as an excuse to crack down on our otherwise legal activities. To say nothing about keeping our message clear and consistent.
Avoiding this danger is as simple as looking for actual arguments, rather than looking for which ‘side’ is cringe and which is based. I guess you can blame two party political systems for this, reducing all political messaging to manichaean absurdity.
More weapons to Ukraine mean fewer weapons for Israeli war crimes and an anti-white federal regime at home.
More weapons mean more production of the concerns, which produce weapons, and more jobs. And those jobs are mostly for white men. The white unemployment will become lower. White men could get more jobs, more salaries, more money. What’s wrong here for white nationalists?
What’s wrong is that the military contractors and their allies the Neo-Trots are our enemies, and it makes them stronger.
Of course it would be better to give this money not to workers of military plants, but to transgender studies and poor Haitians.
It would be even better to give it back to the taxpayers, instead of spending it on our enemies, whether they are foreign invaders or domestic enemies who want us dead.
who want us dead
You already ARE dead. If sometimes it seems that the Western civilidation is moving, it is just an illusion, just like the corpse worms and corpse gases sometimes creates such illusion making the dead body move.
Apparently those of us who thought Russia had at least some valid reasons for their actions were nothing more than Putinbots and Russian stooges. Now like the Left we’re only antiwar when it’s a war we don’t support.
Smacks of strawmanning and self-pity.
Spencer mentioned realizing he was being used by RT and Dugin. I forgot where but probably here in his Adam Green interview. He referenced an interview with Putin where Putin explains he doesn’t care about White people and views Russians as separate, but I couldn’t find it anywhere. Any clue?
Anyways, great article. I won’t shill for Russia, but I have yet to be convinced to shill for Ukraine either. Which is fine I guess since real life is messy and these aren’t sports teams. I wish them both the best though…
The sooner C-C and Co gets over the Putin Derangement Syndrome, the better.
Ukranian nationalists have been played for fools by Anglo-Zionists, and it has cost them hundreds of thousand of lives, a fifth of their land, and much of their industry.
That doesn’t make Putin the good guy, but it should underscore the fact that American nationalists have no allies outside our borders, only interests.
Hilarious. Always the frame that the only two players here are the US and Russia, as if Ukraine had no identity and interests of its own. That’s pure projection, namely the Russian projection that made this war possible.
Of course Ukraine does have interests of its own, but those interests will not be installed by Mr. Zelensky now or ever. It is in his people’s interests to have the Russians and Ukes kill each other off, which is why he keeps running to the White House for billions more so that the bloodshed and death on both sides can continue. And Washington more often than not just hands over several billion more $$$.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/watch-biden-announces-billions-in-ukraine-military-aid-as-zelenskyy-visits-white-house
No, Putin is not our friend. He is a globalist. But why home in on him to the exclusion of Zelensky? The Ukrainians don’t seem to have any memory of the past and the fact that Russians have never been their only enemy.
Russians are just proxies of the Maoist regime in Beijing and are used to have direct access to Europe without those stupid transit lands like Ukraine or Moldova and to “build” One Belt One Road to Europe.
Alrighty. Can someone now step forward and say something bad about Zelensky and the hopelessly harebrained Ukrainians who voted him in, with a majority? If he wants an end to this war, I can’t see it. Do you know anything about his background, his behavior and what he has or has not done for real Ukes prior to the Russian invasion? The attitude here seems to be, “Well, at least he’s not Russian.” Well, he’s not a Ukrainian, either.
So…does anyone here read The Slavland Chronicles on substack? Written by “Rurik Skywalker”.
The latest installment is entitled Vladimir Putin’s Entire Persona is Based on a Fictional USSR Spy Character – Putin is pretending to be James Bond. It is fairly long and you might enjoy reading it. I don’t read all of Rurik’s essays but this particular one caught my eye. I don’t get out much, as they say, so you can let me know if this is a joke or something. Sounds halfway believable to me.
I read him. He presents the most accurate image of the situation in my opinion. Most people either have ridiculous views of Putin and Russia as some trad haven or they are the other extreme and it’s Ukraine as some bastion. Somebody like Rolo is indispensable considering he is not a zanoner and isn’t also colored by the Ukrainian viewpoint that does not project an accurate picture of things either.
Is the Russian regime for or against drag queen story hour, the transgendering of children, and similar depravities now common in the West?
Is the American regime and its Euro lackies for or against drag queen story hour, the transgendering of children, and similar depravities now common in the West?
Okay, then. I know whom I support and whom I oppose.
Oh, so the war in Ukraine is now a crusade against drag queens and trannies? Is anyone fooled by this?
An Americanized Ukraine would be absolutely hideous and degenerate. That’s a fact.
A Russianized Ukraine is a slaughterhouse where the white population is now being replaced by Mongoloids and Churkas from the Caucasus.
There’s another option that is of course ignored because Russia apologists pretend that Ukraine isn’t a real country. When Ukraine enters the EU, it will be a wholesomely conservative influence and a natural ally of countries like Hungary and Poland.
Doubtful. If American interests prevail in Ukraine, the rulers of Ukraine, being as deferential as they are to Uncle Sam and her Euro lackies, would likely be pressured to open their borders immediately to 3rd worlders, as has happened across the rest of the West.
Thus Ukraine would be gifted with both degeneracy AND multiculturalism. No thanks!
Of course you simply maintain the Russian frame that there are only two agents here, Russia and America, and Europe must choose between them.
Even if that were the option, there’s every reason to choose America over Russia. For me, the main reason is that white ethnonationalists have some freedom to organize and speak in the West, but they have no such freedom in Putinstan.
Putin uses “Nazi” like Jews and liberals to stigmatize all forms of ethnic nationalism. “De-Nazification” is one of his expressed goals in Ukraine. In the territory he controls, he is using race replacement migration to do it.
At a certain point, we must conclude that any Western nationalist who supports this is either calamitously ignorant or just a dishonest shill. Neither is a good look.
Do you have any proof of population replacement in Donbas?
Of all people which I know in Ukraine, not only of Qirim Tatars, but also of “native” Ukrainians, no one is drag /or even drug queen or tranny and no one supports or likes this. As far as I know Zelenskyi, with all his faults and errors, does not support it too. When he was an actor, he always laughed at such processes, and, by the way, when he works as a comedian and satiricist his attitude was clear, he mocked at all phenomena, which can be called the degeneration of the West, incl. trannies, etc., and he was sharply criticized for this by Ukrainian liberals, leftists, feminists, and SJWs. Now he sometimes pays lip service to such BS, but it is only for “Western partners”, and all people which I know there have no illusions about “the West”. Also Zelenskiy does not have such illusions.
Talk about a straw man argument!
I oppose transgender insanity, but I oppose race replacement much more. Whites need to get their priorities correct. Putin is a selfish Russian revanchist, mainly interested in increasing his own power, as well as being seen as a great “civic nationalist” (but NOT racial nationalist or even ethnonationalist) who made the multiracial empire called “Russia” larger and stronger. Why should we care about Russian civic nationalist ambitions? It’s not even as if Putin were leading a great, multiracial crusade against Western degeneracy, which at least I could respect, even if I would still oppose it for anti-replacement reasons. This is a gangster power play, nothing more, by Eurasiatic empire against a white European nation. There is no question we should support Ukraine (and this regardless of Jew Zelensky being the leader, or any of the corrupt dealings of the Biden Family – which is the real reason Biden has been moderately pro-Ukraine).
There is no question we should support Ukraine (and this regardless of Jew Zelensky being the leader, or any of the corrupt dealings of the Biden Family – which is the real reason Biden has been moderately pro-Ukraine).
Support how? By sending weapons and more and more $$$? By USA having soldiers over there fighting the Russians? You know, just another foreign war. That’s what The Empire does. Or just by making a statement in support.
For the sake of argument, let’s suppose that Russia backs off, having become tired of the war, or is actually defeated militarily, with the Ukes and their allies marching in. What sort of Ukraine do you think we could expect to see with Zelensky in charge. His people have hated Slavs of every ethnicity since Day One probably more than any other group.
What sort of Ukraine do you think we could expect to see with Zelensky in charge.
Are you sure that Zelensky will stay at power after the war? In the first free elections after the war Ukrainians would vote against him. That is one of reasons why the war is still going on. Neither Ze, nor Pu want to leave their thrones, and the war helps them to stay at power. The end of war would surely mean “Ze out”.
If he wants an end to this war, I can’t see it.
If he had invaded Russia, he could end the war by simply withdrawing his forces. But in this war Putin has invaded and only he can stop the war – doing just this.
It does not change the fact that this is just another one world war, instigated by the British, just like three world wars before it, and waged now still by proxy against the Russian-Chinese block.
Excellent article and commentaries; especially those of Greg Johnson and Kök Böri. I am glad to see the shifting trend among western nationalist-conservative auditory. The number of Putinists is decreasing. The undeniable facts of Kremlin’s genocidal anti-White policies become ever more evident for all to see. It is hardly possible to adhere to White racial identity and in the same time to praise a commi cannibal that killed hundreds of thousands of White people (both Ukrainians and Russians). The remaining die-hard supporters of Putin among western nationalists (such as David Duke and Mark Collett) get into ever more untenable position. How to square up their ideas with increasingly anti-White neo-Soviet rhetoric of the Russian leadership? What about use of Negro soldiers by the Russian army? I stopped listening David Duke’s show back in 2022; I couldn’t endure anymore his insane and utterly illogical Putinism; therefore, I don’t know what he says now. But it is hard for him to acknowledge his grave mistake. Now he is a hostage of this mistake. Such an inglorious conclusion for his previous service for the White race.
Hey Wolf Stoner, it’s good to see you here.
I hope your writings get more exposure in the pro-White community. Western WNs desperately need to hear from Russian WNs who have lived under Putin’s boot for over two decades and have witnessed Russian WN go from being a significant faction in the early 00s to being driven entirely underground in the present. You’d think people who are so Russophilic would have a shred of empathy for Russians who actually share our racial views.
Hello, Supreme Kommandant Irusk. I am glad to meet here likeminded people too. Greg Johnson does a great job of promoting our worldview in a fashion acceptable for mainstream people. It is exceptionally hard to accuse Greg or Jared Taylor in any kind of “extremism”. Their way of presenting information is so calm and measured that it can’t be qualified as “public threat”, whatever the efforts of our enemies.
The main focus of Greg Johnson is in the media sphere. He does his work perfectly.
Using the opportunity I want to mention yet another aspect of our activity besides spreading the message. The main task of the National Alliance is to connect with people in real world; to make a community. It is the task of paramount importance, particularly now when the social conditions become ever more unstable everywhere.
Chairman Williams does his best in this field. I advise all people of our views living in America to consider this option. We must not only connect with likeminded people on Internet but live among them. Yes, it is much more difficult and requires material sacrifice and loss of some city comforts; but there is no substitute for this. At some point everyone will be forced by circumstances to decide: whether to become a part of the White community or to be swept away by swarms of aliens. The sooner the right choice is made the better. It is much easier to arrange it now than to wait until you need to flee for your life.
Mr. Zsutty: The movement frequently criticizes older people for being vulnerable to Zionism, and rightfully diagnoses decades of Jewish dominance of the media, and especially TV, as the biggest cause. Once one steps back it seems odd, even from a Christian perspective, to place Israel on a pedestal as a defender of human rights, democracy, Western civilization, or whatever. Ironically, many of the people who criticize boomers for Zionism venerate Putin and Russia in much the same way that boomers venerate the Jews and Israel.
—
The “movement” is still as Dr. William Pierce described it nearly 50 years ago, here. “WLP91: The So-Called Movement” at nationalvanguard.org: a big tent of hodgepodge groups that are all over the board, all vying to lead our race.
There can be no doubt that we are weak now compared to our enemies, but we will not become stronger by “uniting” with weak or defective organizations — and that includes virtually every “movement” group…
Everyone who considers himself to be in Mr. Zsutty’s “movement” should read Pierce’s “The So-Called Movement” to understand exactly what they are in. Pierce died 22 years ago. Had he lived, today he would be “Boomer Emeritus.” The so-called “movement” might criticize him, but certainly not for “venerating Jews and Israel.” Many in the “movement” will criticize him for exposing Christianity as Jewish and for how unsuitable that creed is for Whites to be worshiping the Jews’ tribal god. The fact is he did more to expose “Jewish dominance of media” than any other single man with his “Who Rules America?” that he updated yearly since first documenting Jewish media control in America in the late 1960s.
—
Wolf Stoner wrote here on October 11: Excellent article and commentaries; especially those of Greg Johnson and Kök Böri. I am glad to see the shifting trend among western nationalist-conservative auditory. The number of Putinists is decreasing. The undeniable facts of Kremlin’s genocidal anti-White policies become ever more evident for all to see… The remaining die-hard supporters of Putin among western nationalists (such as David Duke and Mark Collett) get into ever more untenable position. How to square up their ideas with increasingly anti-White neo-Soviet rhetoric of the Russian leadership?… I stopped listening David Duke’s show back in 2022; I couldn’t endure anymore his insane and utterly illogical Putinism; therefore, I don’t know what he says now. But it is hard for him to acknowledge his grave mistake. Now he is a hostage of this mistake. Such an inglorious conclusion for his previous service for the White race.
—
It takes courage to call out a long-time respected “movement” leader like David Duke for his wronghead position on Putin, but it is necessary. I first met David in 1986 when we were both around 40 and full of piss and vinegar for the cause. Now we are septuagenarian boomers, still active, still relevant, no matter what GenX or Gen Z “movement” youngsters may think. There’s no substitute for experience. Will David remain a “captive of his grave mistake”? We’ll see. He will certainly remain captive of his nominal Christian beliefs because those are the beliefs of his support base.
Thanks for the article.
Huh. Well I may have learned some things however, my disgust with western civilization (jew run) still takes primacy. White civilization is the answer. Rule of good men by a good man. True nobility. A central government that protects the state and only punishes bad local rulers.
Putin’s view of whites sounds no better than starmers. Zelensky is a pervert. And who is dying? White people.
Wow pool made as much in 3 months as CC makes in 4…… Just wow.
Stronza: October 11, 2024 Alrighty. Can someone now step forward and say something bad about Zelensky… Do you know anything about his background, his behavior and what he has or has not done for real?
—
It may not be considered “bad” by other Jew funnymen that before he became leader of Ukraine their coreligionist Zelinsky was also a comic, best known for playing the piano with his organ.
Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy plays piano ‘with his penis’ in 2016 sketch – Daily Star
Before he became the actual president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy pretended to be one for a TV show.
The Ukrainian leader has been projecting a tough and determined image amid Russia’s invasion lately, so it might be surprising to know that Vladimir Putin’s “No. 1 target” used to be an actor a comedian who once played the piano with his genitals…
American nationalists should not be supporting either side in the disastrous Russia/Ukraine brothers’ war.
About time a well known commenter in these parts came out and said this. Thanks. But playing piano with his organ and dancing around in tights & high heels (did you see this?) is not the worst of it, it was just the beginning.
Yet the Ukes tripped all over themselves voting him in. SMH.
Stronza: October 14, 2024 About time a well known commenter in these parts came out and said this. Thanks.
You’re welcome. I cannot be the only person here who is aware of the Jew funnyman’s perverted past. I saw that even a couple of years ago there were more than a million views of Zelinsky’s piano-playing on JewTube.
Yet the Ukes tripped all over themselves voting him in.
One of causes was that Zelensky was against the so-called Maydan and (as an actor) openly critized and mocked at the West, Europe, and “Eurointegration” of Ukraine. Very many Ukrainians were and are against the West and “Eurointegration” (and this does not necessarily mean that they are pro-Russian), so they vote Maydanite Poroshenko out from the presidental office. Instead Zelensky everybody could win, if only he was against Maydan, but Zelensky was a popular actor, that’s why he won.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy pretended to be one for a TV show
Interesting to know that a satirical president of Ukraine, which Zelenskyi played in the TV-Series, had strong anti-Western positions.
the disastrous Russia/Ukraine brothers’ war
In the China’s war for Donbass lithium and for the direct way to Europe, the Chinese New Silky Way.
Do you have any proof of population replacement in Donbas?
The Caucasians are massively resettled to half-destroyed Marioupol. Especially from Dagestan.
@Will Williams. Z’s lurid comic acts are the least of my concerns at this point.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/449105/zelensky-announces-alliance-with-blackrock-for-reconstruction-of-ukraine/
Truly, it is all over for Ukrainians.
BlackRock and the WEF are both prestigious economic vehicles; BlackRock is the world’s largest money manager, with assets of $8 trillion, while the WEF plays a central role in global economic planning and development. Both are highly controversial, however, particularly because they push environmental, social, and governance practices, known as ESG. The WEF has drawn criticism for articles and tweets in which it seems to advocate the widespread abolition of property and privacy.
The lands will belong to BlackRock and the population will be replaced with more “profitable” Africans, Arabs or Bengalis, they are cheaper labor than Ukrainians. Ukrainians should be killed, some women and children will stay in the West to improve racial situation of the “Western Partners”. Future Ukraine should have not more than 20 (or even 17) millions.
By the way, in Russia the Russians are replaced with Central Asians, Afghanis and possible also Norther Koreans. Economically Russia is also overpopulated, so it should have only 50 millions.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.