Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 557
New Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson
Counter-Currents Radio
The second half of last weekend’s broadcast of Counter-Currents Radio was a solo Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson, where he took questions from the listeners, and it is now available for download and online listening.
Topics discussed include:
00:44 What did you feel when you saw the image of the Robert E. Lee statue melting?
08:55 Comment on Ukraine
09:30 Thoughts on White Nationalists getting graduate degrees
16:17 What would you do with a million dollars?
23:52 Is transsexuality a psyop?
27:07 Should we artificially grow new white people in incubators?
33:24 What do you think about revenge?
41:10 What if we’re not billionaires?
42:31 Jews as the intended audience of Christ
46:53 Will World War III happen?
49:36 Might Derek Chauvin be acquitted?
To listen in a player, click here or below. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
Counter-Currents%20Radio%20Podcast%20No.%20557%0ANew%20Ask%20Me%20Anything%20with%20Greg%20Johnson%0A
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 630 Spencer Quinn
-
The Rest of Marianne Faithfull
-
Remembering Flannery O’Connor
-
Response to Greg Johnson and Joel Davis
-
The Cloud
-
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 629: Joel Davis and the NS Question
-
It’s Not So Easy to End a War: The Korean Conflict & Its Bomb Building Aftermath
-
The Best of Marianne Faithfull
3 comments
The point was made on the broadcast that statues of George Floyd should be melted down (with due legal process, of course!).
The dilemma on the “statues” issue has been that the Right has been on the defensive, trying to preserve memorials to great Americans like Robert E. Lee, the Founding Fathers and just about any other White hero. But in psychological warfare, once you are on the defensive…you lose. You have to take the initiative to win, making the other side burn up their time and resources reacting to your moves.
One propaganda line might be:
“Why should we have statues glorifying a career criminal who died while resisting the lawful orders of a peace officer?” One can point out that the hagiography over George Floyd is doing much to promote the rising tide of criminal activity which is devastating many once grand urban areas.
The advantage to this line is two-fold. Superficially, it is to remove the statues of a Leftist icon and thus deal a blow against their morale. How can they complain? The Left has already set the precedent when it comes to iconoclasm!
But the underlying tactic is to open the way for rolling back the anti-White march through the institutions which has been in progress for decades. Once Floyd is removed from the public square, other anti-White icons can be brought down (“Why should we glorify agitators who subverted the entire Constitution, pace Cantwell’s The Age of Entitlement?”).
Continue on to dumping the 1619 Project, affirmative action, the ESG-CRT-DIE commissariat, subsidies to the BLM cult, Juneteenth, and etc.
Call it the Great PC Meltdown.
When we establish the white ethnostate we will erect monuments to Chauvin and the Brunswick 3 as martyrs to the failed and evil ideology of multiracialism.
Perhaps a whole museum is in order.
On revenge, the general opinion of the great Greeks was that we should abandon the Kindly Ones and resign ourselves to the courts, behind which stood the Olympians.
The opinions of such great men have to be taken very seriously, but there are problems. We have no Olympians, and no guarantee of the honesty of the courts. We also lack honest courts, so this is not just a theoretical problem. We can see that we face race-ending evils, evils beyond anything the poets imagined, in part because the courts don’t strike down and actually uphold the pollution of moral fundamentals. We see “gender theory” and sterilizing mutilations of children upheld by the courts. This is true horror. There are other grave injustices imposed or upheld by judges.
The model man who aims at the healthiest life for his solitary self by letting things go needs a just society, but he can’t produce or sustain one. At best he’s a free rider on the courage and moral sense of others; at worst he’s part of a slave army that strikes down all justice and imposes sheer filth.
Often enough to matter, it’s justice and a necessary sort of cleanliness from the Kindly Ones or else no justice at all, and a kind of limitless filth that sickens the decent soul.
I think we should revere the Kindly Ones. We are not done with them, and they are not done with us. Bottom line: Marianne Bachmeier did nothing wrong.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.