Counter-Currents
  • Private Events
  • T&C
  • Contact
  • Webzine
  • About
  • Books
  • Podcasts
  • Donate
  • Paywall
  • Crypto
  • Mailing List
  • RSS
    • Main feed
    • Podcast feed
    • Videos feed
    • Comments feed
  • Advertise

LEVEL2

  • Webzine
  • About
  • Books
  • Podcasts
  • Donate
  • Paywall
  • Crypto
  • Mailing List
  • RSS
    • Main feed
    • Podcast feed
    • Videos feed
    • Comments feed
  • Advertise
  • Recent posts

    • Black Invention Myths

      Black Invention Myths

    • Race War in the Outback

      Jim Goad

      21

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 7 More of the Most Common Jobs for Psychopaths

      James Dunphy

    • Black History Month Resources

      Greg Johnson

      5

    • 40% Off Selected Titles

      Cyan Quinn

      5

    • The Union Jackal, January 2023

      Mark Gullick

      3

    • Spencer J. Quinn’s The No College Club: A Review

      Anthony Bavaria

      6

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 521 Daily Zoomer & Spencer J. Quinn Discuss The No College Club

      Counter-Currents Radio

      1

    • Everything Whites Do Is Bad . . . According to the Mainstream Media

      Beau Albrecht

      12

    • Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio

      Margot Metroland

      6

    • American Krogan on Louis C. K. Advocating for Open Borders

      American Krogan

      11

    • Traditional French Songs from Le Poème Harmonique

      Alex Graham

      1

    • The Worst Week Yet: January 22-28, 2023

      Jim Goad

      25

    • Sports Cars & Small Penises

      Richard Houck

      29

    • Opiates for America’s Heartland

      Morris van de Camp

      11

    • The Whale

      Steven Clark

      3

    • Are Qur’an-Burnings Helpful?

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      15

    • Bullet Train to Babylon

      Trevor Lynch

      7

    • The Wave: Fascism Reenacted in a High School

      Beau Albrecht

      6

    • Edred Thorsson a jeho kniha Historie Runové gildy

      Collin Cleary

    • Silicon Valley’s Anti-White Racial Dysgenics Program

      Jason Kessler

      31

    • The Silent Plague of Elderly Asian Mass Shooters in California

      Jim Goad

      36

    • What Went Wrong with America’s Universities?

      Stephen Paul Foster

      3

    • Greg Johnson Speaks to Horus the Avenger About Charles Krafft

      Greg Johnson

      5

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 6 The Most Common Jobs for Psychopaths

      James Dunphy

      13

    • Davos, or the Technocrats’ Ball

      Mark Gullick

      5

    • A Political Prisoner on the Meaning of January 6

      Morris van de Camp

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 520 Inside Serbia with Marko of Zentropa

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • The $50 Million Conservative Inc. Internet Spat

      Spencer J. Quinn

      15

    • Yet Another Woke Remake of a Classic

      Beau Albrecht

      25

    • Spencer J. Quinn & Pox Populi Discuss The No College Club

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 4: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • The Worst Week Yet: January 15-21, 2023

      Jim Goad

      35

    • Q&A with Jim Goad on The Redneck Manifesto

      Jason Kessler

      3

    • Against Political Hipsterism

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      6

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 3: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • Against White Unionism

      Greg Johnson

      7

    • Hitchcock vs. Visconti

      Derek Hawthorne

      9

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 2: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • Public Transit in Multicultural Hell

      Gunnar Alfredsson

      12

    • No, You Wasn’t Kings

      Jim Goad

      36

    • The 2022 Counter-Currents Fall Retreat James Edwards & Sam Dickson on White Nationalism in Electoral Politics

      James Edwards & Sam Dickson

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 1: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

      1

    • On the Christian Question

      David Lewis

      78

    • Physician, Heal Thyself: The Persecution of Jordan Peterson

      Mark Gullick

      22

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 5 The Workplace

      James Dunphy

      1

    • The Secret of My Success

      Steven Clark

      2

    • We Are All Mr. Bridge

      Spencer J. Quinn

      26

    • Wokeism’s Loyal Evangelical Subjects

      Robert Hampton

      21

    • The Lie of Afrocentrism

      Morris van de Camp

      22

  • Classics Corner

    • Remembering A. R. D. “Rex” Fairburn (February 2, 1904–March 25, 1957)

      Greg Johnson

      1

    • Denis Kearney & the Struggle for a White America

      Theodore J. O'Keefe

      1

    • Posthuman Prospects:
      Artificial Intelligence, Fifth Generation Warfare, & Archeofuturism

      Christopher Pankhurst

      5

    • Earnest Sevier Cox:
      Advocate for the White Ethnostate

      Morris van de Camp

      15

    • Remembering Jack London
      (January 12, 1876–November 22, 1916)

      Greg Johnson

      2

    • Remembering Robinson Jeffers:
      January 10, 1887–January 20, 1962

      John Morgan

      3

    • Remembering Pierre Drieu La Rochelle:
      January 3, 1893–March 15, 1945

      Greg Johnson

    • Remembering Rudyard Kipling (December 30, 1865-January 18, 1936)

      Greg Johnson

      10

    • Restoring White Homelands

      Greg Johnson

      34

    • Remembering Hinton Rowan Helper

      Spencer J. Quinn

      11

    • What’s Wrong with Diversity?

      Greg Johnson

      10

    • Redefining the Mainstream

      Greg Johnson

      3

    • Edward Alsworth Ross:
      American Metapolitical Hero

      Morris van de Camp

      8

    • The Talented Mr. Ripley & Purple Noon

      Trevor Lynch

      19

    • Christmas & the Yuletide:
      Light in the Darkness

      William de Vere

      3

    • Thanksgiving Special 
      White Men Meet Indians:
      Jamestown & the Clash of Civilizations

      Thomas Jackson

    • Colin Wilson’s The Outsider

      Sir Oswald Mosley

      4

    • Dostoyevsky on the Jews

      William Pierce

      4

    • Jefferson &/or Mussolini, Part 1

      Ezra Pound

      5

    • I Listened to Chapo Trap House So You Don’t Have To

      Doug Huntington

      98

    • The Homeric Gods

      Mark Dyal

      13

    • Toward a Baltic-Black Sea Union:
      “Intermarium” as a Viable Model for White Revival

      Émile Durand

      55

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 3

      John Morgan

      30

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 2

      John Morgan

      6

    • Columbus Day Special
      The Autochthony Argument

      Greg Johnson

      9

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 1

      John Morgan

      8

    • The Jewish Question for Normies

      Alan Smithee

      13

    • Human Biodiversity for Normies

      Alan Smithee

      10

    • Bring Back Prohibition!

      Alan Smithee

      65

    • Ethnonationalism for Normies
      (Or, “On the Sense of Coming Home”)

      Alan Smithee

      8

  • Paroled from the Paywall

    • The French Emperor, the German Nutcracker, & the Russian Ballet Part 2

      Kathryn S.

      4

    • The French Emperor, the German Nutcracker, & the Russian Ballet Part 1

      Kathryn S.

    • Death on the Nile (1978 & 2022)

      Trevor Lynch

      13

    • Error & Pride

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      12

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 515 The Christmas Special

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 514 The Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present, & Yet to Come on The Writers’ Bloc

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Race & the Bible

      Morris van de Camp

      2

    • PK van der Byl, African Statesman

      Margot Metroland

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 513 The Writers’ Bloc with Horus on the Implicit Whiteness of Liberalism

      Counter-Currents Radio

      4

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 512 Jim Goad on Answer Me!

      Counter-Currents Radio

      3

    • Cleese on Creativity

      Greg Johnson

      6

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 1 Diagnostic Criteria, Associated Personality Disorders, & Brain Attributes

      James Dunphy

      6

    • Death of a Gadfly:
      Plato’s Apology

      Mark Gullick

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 8:
      Ernesto Laclau & Left-Wing Populism

      Alain de Benoist

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 511
      Christmas Lore with Hwitgeard on The Writers’ Bloc

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Bringing Guns to an Idea Fight:
      The Career of Robert DePugh

      Morris van de Camp

      4

    • War Is Our Father

      Gunnar Alfredsson

    • The Foremost Threat to Life on Earth

      James Dunphy

      2

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 510
      The Writers’ Bloc with Jason Kessler on the Kanye Question

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 509
      New Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson

      Counter-Currents Radio

      6

    • The Problem of Gentile Zionism

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 7:
      Money & the Right

      Alain de Benoist

      2

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 6:
      Liberalism & Morality

      Alain de Benoist

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 507
      The Best Month Ever on The Writers’ Bloc with Anthony Bavaria

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Who Is Not Going to Save the Nation?

      Beau Albrecht

      4

    • J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Fall of Númenor

      Alex Graham

      3

    • The Most Overlooked Christmas Carols

      Buck Hunter

      4

    • Mirko Savage, Mother Europe’s Son

      Ondrej Mann

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 506
      The Writers’ Bloc with Jim Goad on J. D. Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy

      Counter-Currents Radio

      2

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 505
      Mark Weber on the Perils of Empire

      Counter-Currents Radio

      3

  • Recent comments

    • Antipodean

      Race War in the Outback

      Very droll.In fairness to my country-men though, many of the hybrid folk are quite charming, even to...

    • Vehmgericht

      Race War in the Outback

      I have a hunch that the cradle of modern Homo sapiens is not East Africa, as we are so frantically...

    • Greg Johnson

      40% Off Selected Titles

      If you have a question, write to [email protected]

    • Fred C. Dobbs

      Race War in the Outback

      We can’t expect Hollywood to portray them in a negative light. You’re correct. The few people I’ve...

    • J Webb

      Race War in the Outback

      Very worthwhile topic. We will see how cleverly Australia will handle this. Will they give in to...

    • Don

      Spencer J. Quinn’s The No College Club: A Review

      A  great step in the right direction. Good, idea driven  pro-White fiction, especially for young...

    • James Kirkpatrick

      Race War in the Outback

      Haha, true!  But I mean in real life, photographs and videos.  In other words, that is all...

    • Fire Walk With Lee

      Race War in the Outback

      "The aborigines call him Jabba-Jahda-Ah-Der-Ahd, which means The Crocodile Who Walks Like a Man."The...

    • Antipodean

      Race War in the Outback

      There are still some pure-blooded aboriginals alive today. They and we have certainly had no problem...

    • Antipodean

      Race War in the Outback

      The activists prefer “First Nations’ people”; I guess they picked that up at a conference with their...

    • Bob Roberts

      Race War in the Outback

      Clearly Australia needs some reasonable gun control laws.   "Their ghastly prehistoric...

    • Fred C. Dobbs

      Race War in the Outback

      They were portrayed in a positive light in the movie Crocodile Dundee. Mick Dundee even participated...

    • Vehmgericht

      Race War in the Outback

      Are the Australian Aboriginals truly modern Homo sapiens or a relict population of earlier hominids...

    • Uncle Semantic

      Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio

      I assume this movie was better than the Robert Zemeckis live-action one? Two Pinocchios in one ‘22...

    • Andrew Christopher

      Race War in the Outback

      Self-defense from Anarcho-Tyranny (e.g. elites using minority groups and 'refugees' as a battering...

    • Kenny Voi

      Race War in the Outback

      There are two types of people in this world: Those who descend from men who tried to take over the...

    • James Kirkpatrick

      Race War in the Outback

      I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a picture of one not squatting in the dirt, shuffling down a sidewalk...

    • James Kirkpatrick

      Race War in the Outback

      For those with eyes to see (or, rather, ears to hear), the juxtaposition tells a cruel truth; no...

    • davidcito

      Race War in the Outback

      "Some of these houses have 10-15 people sleeping on the floor of a three-bedroom house."  I...

    • Shift

      Race War in the Outback

      Just capitalize the "A" in Aborigine and they'll settle down in a jiffy.

  • Book Authors

    • Alain de Benoist
    • Anthony M. Ludovici
    • Beau Albrecht
    • Buttercup Dew
    • Charles Krafft
    • Christopher Pankhurst
    • Collin Cleary
    • F. Roger Devlin
    • Fenek Solère
    • Francis Parker Yockey
    • Greg Johnson
    • Gregory Hood
    • H. L. Mencken
    • Irmin Vinson
    • J. A. Nicholl
    • James J. O’Meara
    • Jef Costello
    • Jim Goad
    • Jonathan Bowden
    • Juleigh Howard-Hobson
    • Julius Evola
    • Kerry Bolton
    • Leo Yankevich
    • Michael Polignano
    • Multiple authors
    • Savitri Devi
    • Spencer J. Quinn
    • Tito Perdue
    • Trevor Lynch
  • Webzine Authors

    Contemporary authors

    • Howe Abbott-Hiss
    • Beau Albrecht
    • Aquilonius
    • Anthony Bavaria
    • Michael Bell
    • Alain de Benoist
    • Kerry Bolton
    • Jonathan Bowden
    • Buttercup Dew
    • Collin Cleary
    • Giles Corey
    • Jef Costello
    • Morris V. de Camp
    • F. Roger Devlin
    • Bain Dewitt
    • Jack Donovan
    • Ricardo Duchesne
    • Émile Durand
    • Guillaume Durocher
    • Mark Dyal
    • Guillaume Faye
    • Stephen Paul Foster
    • Fullmoon Ancestry
    • Jim Goad
    • Tom Goodrich
    • Alex Graham
    • Mark Gullick
    • Andrew Hamilton
    • Robert Hampton
    • Huntley Haverstock
    • Derek Hawthorne
    • Gregory Hood
    • Juleigh Howard-Hobson
    • Richard Houck
    • Alexander Jacob
    • Nicholas R. Jeelvy
    • Greg Johnson
    • Ruuben Kaalep
    • Tobias Langdon
    • Julian Langness
    • Travis LeBlanc
    • Patrick Le Brun
    • Trevor Lynch
    • Kevin MacDonald
    • G. A. Malvicini
    • John Michael McCloughlin
    • Margot Metroland
    • Millennial Woes
    • John Morgan
    • James J. O'Meara
    • Michael O'Meara
    • Christopher Pankhurst
    • Michael Polignano
    • J. J. Przybylski
    • Spencer J. Quinn
    • Quintilian
    • Edouard Rix
    • C. B. Robertson
    • C. F. Robinson
    • Hervé Ryssen
    • Kathryn S.
    • Alan Smithee
    • Fenek Solère
    • Ann Sterzinger
    • Thomas Steuben
    • Robert Steuckers
    • Tomislav Sunić
    • Donald Thoresen
    • Marian Van Court
    • Dominique Venner
    • Irmin Vinson
    • Michael Walker
    • Aylmer Wedgwood
    • Scott Weisswald
    • Leo Yankevich

    Classic Authors

    • Maurice Bardèche
    • Julius Evola
    • Ernst Jünger
    • D. H. Lawrence
    • Charles Lindbergh
    • Jack London
    • H. P. Lovecraft
    • Anthony M. Ludovici
    • Sir Oswald Mosley
    • National Vanguard
    • Friedrich Nietzsche
    • Revilo Oliver
    • William Pierce
    • Ezra Pound
    • Saint-Loup
    • Savitri Devi
    • Carl Schmitt
    • Miguel Serrano
    • Oswald Spengler
    • P. R. Stephensen
    • Jean Thiriart
    • John Tyndall
    • Francis Parker Yockey
  • Departments

    • Book Reviews
    • Movie Reviews
    • TV Reviews
    • Music Reviews
    • Art Criticism
    • Graphic Novels & Comics
    • Video Game Reviews
    • Fiction
    • Poems
    • Interviews
    • Videos
    • English Translations
    • Other Languages
      • Arabic
      • Bulgarian
      • Croatian
      • Czech
      • Danish
      • Dutch
      • Estonian
      • Finnish
      • French
      • German
      • Greek
      • Hungarian
      • Italian
      • Lithuanian
      • Norwegian
      • Polish
      • Portuguese
      • Romanian
      • Russian
      • Slovak
      • Spanish
      • Swedish
      • Ukrainian
    • Commemorations
    • Why We Write
  • Archives
  • Top 100 Commenters
  • Private Events
  • T&C
  • Contact
Sponsored Links
Above Time Coffee Antelope Hill Publishing Paul Waggener IHR-Store Asatru Folk Assembly Breakey Imperium Press American Renaissance The Patrick Ryan Show Jim Goad The Occidental Observer
Print April 29, 2022 26 comments

The Latest “New Right” Avoids the Core Issue

Robert Hampton

The saviors of the white race?

1,427 words

It seems that every ten years a “New Right” emerges in America. The National Review was seen as the “New Right” in the 1950s. There was a “New Right” in the 1980s with Ronald Reagan’s ascent. There have been many New Rights in Europe as well. Over the past ten years, the term “New Right” was mostly the provenance of American identitarians; hence the North American New Right of which Counter-Currents is a part.

But there’s another New Right that’s arisen over the past few years — and the press loves to talk about it. This group likes to portray themselves as radicals and adversaries against conservative orthodoxy. They tout themselves as the future of the Right, and they promise to be the Left’s worst nightmare. That terrifying image must explain why liberal journalists can’t stop writing about how they’re so dang intriguing!

But this “radical” group of writers, activists, and podcasters fails to address the core issue — namely, race. All of the profiles of these latest New Right figures show a group defined more by what they oppose than what they’re for. Most of what they say is mere sloganeering rather than serious analysis, and moreover they deny the importance of race and refuse to stand up for the white man.

The latest puff piece on the New Right comes courtesy of Vanity Fair. The article’s author, James Pogue, mostly focuses on the neoreactionary Curtis Yarvin, aka Mencius Moldbug, and Senate candidates J. D. Vance and Blake Masters. In between we’re introduced to a variety of personalities that you probably have never heard of and would not count as “Dissident Right.” The author nevertheless does deploy the term Dissident Right, and even defines it:

The podcasters, bro-ish anonymous Twitter posters, online philosophers, artists, and amorphous scenesters in this world are variously known as “dissidents,” “neo-reactionaries,” “post-leftists,” or the “heterodox” fringe — though they’re all often grouped for convenience under the heading of America’s New Right. They have a wildly diverse set of political backgrounds, with influences ranging from 17th-century Jacobite royalists to Marxist cultural critics to so-called reactionary feminists to the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski, whom they sometimes refer to with semi-ironic affection as Uncle Ted. Which is to say that this New Right is not a part of the conservative movement as most people in America would understand it. It’s better described as a tangled set of frameworks for critiquing the systems of power and propaganda that most people reading this probably think of as “the way the world is.” And one point shapes all of it: It is a project to overthrow the thrust of progress, at least such as liberals understand the word.

Most Counter-Currents readers would probably think that description accurately identifies the Dissident Right’s “big tent,” but race realism and identitarianism apparently aren’t part of it. Race is only discussed in the context of opposition to Critical Race Theory. Immigration is only mentioned once. Demographics is never mentioned at all. There are only two paragraphs that deal with race realism and identitarianism – in which it is claimed that the New Right eschews both concepts.

The first paragraph discusses how Yarvin no longer associates with these ideas:

As Moldbug, Yarvin wrote about race-based IQ differences, and in an early post, titled “Why I Am Not a White Nationalist,” he defended reading and linking to white nationalist writing. He told me he’d pursued those early writings in a spirit of “open inquiry,” though Yarvin also openly acknowledged in the post that some of his readers seemed to be white nationalists.

You can buy Greg Johnson’s New Right vs. Old Right here

The succeeding paragraph quotes Yarvin as saying he’s tempered himself in middle age.

The second paragraph follows Pogue discussing how he saw few blacks at a National Conservatism Conference, but that several South Asians and Middle Easterners were in attendance. It discusses the criticism lobbed at the New Right and how accusations of racism don’t seem to faze its adherents:

In March, the journalist Jeff Sharlet (a Vanity Fair contributing editor who covers the American right) tweeted that the “intellectual New Right is a white supremacist project designed to cultivate non-white support,” and he linked it to resurgent nationalist and authoritarian politics around the world: “It’s part of a global fascist movement not limited to the anti-blackness of the U.S. & Europe.” Yet many on the New Right seem increasingly unfazed by accusations that they’re white nationalists or racists. Masters in particular seems willing to goad commentators, believing that the ensuing arguments will redound to his political advantage: “Good luck [hitting] me with that,” Masters told the podcaster Alex Kaschuta recently, arguing that accusations of racism had become a political bludgeon used to keep conservative ideas outside the political mainstream. “Good luck criticizing me for saying critical race theory is anti-white.”

It’s a good sign that these figures shrug at suggestions they’re racist and that some of them are willing to call Critical Race Theory anti-white (particularly the ones running for office). But it appears the real issues don’t animate them. These folks simply don’t like the liberal elite, globalism, or free market orthodoxy. What they are for is not really explored, besides the political candidates saying they would like families to live off a single-earner income.

This lack of clarity leads to embarrassments. Pogue’s broad definition of the Dissident Right leads him to describe a certain podcast known as The Fedpost as part of the movement. The podcast is co-hosted by a half-black, half-Asian man who spends most of his time on social media railing against Right-wingers, “racists,” and white people. This person insists he only cares about class, not race. This hardly sounds like the Dissident Right.

Prominent Dissident Right figures are never mentioned in the article. Nick Fuentes, the Groypers, Jared Taylor, Bronze Age Pervert, and Peter Brimelow are completely ignored. You would think all the energy and ideas come from the National Conservatism conferences and Sohrab Ahmari. Donald Trump, the man who popularized these ideas and trends in 2016, is barely mentioned in the article. This movement seems to have just appeared out of nowhere, independent of both Trump and the Alt Right phenomenon.

The most glaring issue is not which figures or issues are discussed; it’s the ignorance of what made national populism a thing. Trump voters were not riled up by appeals to some nebulous conception of the “common good,” neoreactionary theory, family tax credits, abortion, minimum wage increases, or student loan debt forgiveness. They were outraged at their own dispossession and rallied behind Trump as the one candidate who shared their anxiety. It wasn’t a class revolt motivated by economic concerns; it was a white revolt motivated by racial tensions. Race and identity were the key principles.

Other profiles of the movement similarly ignore this fact and pretend the New Right is something far more respectable. The New Republic’s profile from last December described the factions of the New Right thusly:

Some are “national conservatives,” who, like “Reformicons” of the 2010s, support pro-family welfare policy and reject the GOP’s tax-cutting orthodoxy. (NatCons, as they’re known, also tend to be China and immigration hawks who want an “industrial policy” for the heartland.) Others are “postliberal” localists, in the vein of Patrick Deneen, who wrote Why Liberalism Failed, and Rod Dreher, the irascible Eastern Orthodox blogger and author of The Benedict Option, a spirited argument for Christian retreat from the turpitude of public life into virtuous communal separatism. And others are Roman Catholic integralists, aspiring to a theologically ordered politics; Harvard Law professor Adrian Vermeule and University of Dallas politics professor and American Affairs editor Gladden Pappin are their touchstones.

“Whichever denomination they prefer, New Rightists tend to agree that classical liberalism — of the sort embraced by previous generations of conservatives — has a big hole in the middle of it where a substantive concept of the Good should be,” the liberal magazine said of the New Right’s unifying principle.

That’s not at all what drives the Dissident Right, nor what animated Trumpism. It just motivates pundits who believe it will make them edgy — but not too edgy. They don’t want to jeopardize plaudits from the liberal media.

Race and identity are the core issues facing America today. Class warfare is an anachronism that makes no sense for the Right when much of our base is middle class. Integralism is the definition of LARP. National conservatism only makes sense if it stands up for a people, not an abstraction dreamt up by Yoram Hazony.

The only path forward is white identity politics. Everything else is a distraction.

*  *  *

Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.

  • First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
  • Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.

To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:

Paywall Gift Subscriptions

If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:

  • your payment
  • the recipient’s name
  • the recipient’s email address
  • your name
  • your email address

To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.

Related

  • A Political Prisoner on the Meaning of January 6

  • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 4: “Multitudes” Against the People

  • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 3: “Multitudes” Against the People

  • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 2: “Multitudes” Against the People

  • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 1: “Multitudes” Against the People

  • Wokeism’s Loyal Evangelical Subjects

  • The Populist Moment, Chapter 10, Part 2: The Ambiguity of “Communitarianism”

  • The Populist Moment, Chapter 10, Part 1: The Ambiguity of “Communitarianism”

Tags

civic nationalismConservatism Inc.conservativesCurtis YarvinDissident RightDonald TrumpJames PogueMencius Moldbugnational conservatismNational Conservative ConferenceNew RightpopulismRobert HamptonThe FedpostVanity Fairwhite identity politics

Previous

« Remembering Sam Francis
(April 29, 1947–February 15, 2005)

Next

» “Many Strange & Terrible Days”:
Gothic Science Fiction & Modern War, Part 1

26 comments

  1. Devon says:
    April 29, 2022 at 9:02 am

    Why would (((Rubin))), (((Hazony))), an Iranian and a homosexual not care about the future of the White race? Total mystery.

  2. Hamburger Today says:
    April 29, 2022 at 9:44 am

    ‘The only path forward is white identity politics.’

    Yes.

    ‘Everything else is a distraction.’

    No.

    ‘Everything else’ that can support the ambitions of White Identity Nationalism is not a distraction.

    We need to set aside this either/or – dismissive – style of thinking. And we need to figure out why we so readily fall into it.

    The Faux Dissident Right is an attempt to address problems that concern White people (as well as non-Whites) without actually addressing Whites as a people.

    The issue here isn’t whether they’re right and and we’re wrong or vice-versa, is it? That’s never going to be settled between different political factions. The issue is what, then? That their policies will make Whites content with their dispossession and slow-roll genocide?

    We need to start looking at our motives for picking the enemies that we pick and talking about them the way that we do in order to make sure that we don’t let our passions get in the way making a clear-headed analysis that can inform our responses.

    Our enemies know who we are and we know who they are.

    We also know our enemies have enormous resources that they can employ to create whatever illusion of popular support that they wish to create.

    We are in a struggle with our enemy and we cannot expect them to not use every means necessary to defeat us.

    This iteration of a ‘New Right’ that is not a Racial Right is an opportunity as much as an obstacle.

    We experience our enemy as a black box emitting signals into the fog of war.

    Instead of arguing with those signals, we should attempt to use them to extrapolate our enemy’s thinking and analyzing their maneuvering over time.

    Also, it might do for our analysts to understand what ‘ablative armor’ is and how it’s used in modern warfare.

    Our enemy will keep putting forward ablative armor in the form of controlled pseudo-oppositions as long as is necessary to demoralize us or provide a more comforting version of politics that keeps our enemy in the cat-bird seat and White Identity Nationalism on the fringes, outside the limelight.

    However, the enemy has to go so far as to back people who are using the term ‘antiwhite’.

    Everyone should see that for the maneuvering for position that it is.

    As predicted, there will be more anti-antiwhite politics as a way to defuse genuinely pro-White politics.

    Our analyses should take into account whether (a) this is good for White people and, if so, (b) over what horizon is it a good thing? Our analyses should also look at ways to use their intellectual and moral territorial concessions to our advantage, and not just focus in ‘the win’.

  3. John says:
    April 29, 2022 at 5:31 pm

    “The Latest “New Right” Avoids the Core Issue”, therefore, we ignore them – they’re controlled opposition.  The tiptoeing surrounding our existence needs to end.  The logic is simple – English for the most part, settled, created, built the institutions, built the country (for White persons…of good character) other Europeans joined in & although it wasn’t always easy it worked out & there was no anti-White & no tearing down our statues.  The third world people cannot create what we Europeans create, hence, they move into our societies to our detriment; us running away to build our own societies (when we already had our own spaces) means we are giving away parts of our homeland that our ancestors worked, bled, & died for, and, the third world will continue to want to move where we are.  We cannot give up one inch, we repatriate as per “The Slow Cleanse aka Restoring White Homelands” by Greg Johnson, &, we must deal with our traitors.  The racial conflict continues, the assaults continue, the murders continue, every twelve months 20,000+ European Women  are raped by non-Europeans, etc.

    Yes, the logic is easy.  Now, do we have the will?

    1. Anthony Bavaria says:
      April 29, 2022 at 7:52 pm

      “…they’re controlled opposition.”

      Never thought of it this way… interesting perspective.

      “The tiptoeing surrounding our existence needs to end.”

      We literally need ONE normal mainstream politician/commentator to just come out and address the war on white people. Obviously, this person will be crucified and buried under the white house lawn, but a lot of people are ready/need to hear it.

  4. Vehmgericht says:
    April 29, 2022 at 6:47 pm

    This ‘New Right’, unlike its Francophone namesake, appears to be composed of persons whose views would have been accounted solidly Left-Liberal a couple of decades ago. The demographic destiny of Europe and the four surviving anglophone settler-nations is above all other considerations, and sniping at peripheral manifestations such as the ‘trans’ ideology and lockdowns will no longer suffice.

    1. Lord Shang says:
      April 30, 2022 at 9:15 pm

      I’ve been saying for more than 40 years (not lying) that not only is immigration restriction the #1 issue by lightyears, but that anyone who does not support halting the Replacement (in the past I would have said “invasion) cannot be called “conservative”. What is the first principle of “conservatism” if not the defense of your people from internal subversion (which includes criminal mayhem) and foreign invasion?

  5. Anthony Bavaria says:
    April 29, 2022 at 7:55 pm

    There’s a lot of really smart/good people under this “new right” banner but yea, I’m assuming they’re just too aware of what’ll happen to them if they address the race issue. And if they, too, disbelieve what’s happening as far as race goes, then they’re just naïve.

    Decades of social engineering has made this topic completely untouchable, its really amazing when you think about it.

    1. Lord Shang says:
      April 30, 2022 at 9:52 pm

      I disagree. I think one can address racial differences to conservatives in a sober and responsible, but also enlightening, way (leftists are hysterics and mental patients, esp wrt race, so they are out of bounds for serious discussions). Moreover, one can totally get at these issues implicitly – via attacking CRT; advocating deporting all illegals (which I myself continue to do (if the topic is broached) in a woke-y company in a very blue state area), building the Wall, and an legal immigration moratorium; denouncing BLM (easier today than 2 years ago); acknowledging black crime rates; complaining about affirmative action (but without bringing in group differences in IQ),  and so much more.

      What cannot be done, except by true, self-supporting Dissidents, is to talk about white nationalism, white preservation (which is funny in its rank hypocrisy, if you think about it), the evil of miscegenation, how queers and trannies are weird and repellent, how women are psychologically unsuited for many professions, and how America was soooo much better when it was soooo much whiter (although I love to talk about how wonderful were “the good old days”; I think some of my douchebag colleagues get what I’m about, but they can’t prove anything to my detriment; anyway, everyone already knows I’m a Republican). The other thing that could literally get me fired would be for me to say that the 2020 election was flat-out stolen (libtards have ‘probed’ me on this, and I always say merely that “there were documented election irregularities, and they should have been formally investigated”).

      1. Anthony Bavaria says:
        May 1, 2022 at 10:09 am

        I feel like the “new right” types discussed in this article also somewhat probe into the topics in your first paragraph but yea, the second paragraphs topics are all off limits, and I’ll also add the good ol’ JQ!

  6. ValhallaX says:
    April 29, 2022 at 9:05 pm

    They are Jews. Enough said, never, ever, any good for us. Never. Not one single time, never will be, never has been. One needs to know no more, all other speculation is playing to their hands. No dialogue, no deals, nothing.

    1. James J. O'Meara says:
      April 30, 2022 at 8:24 am

      But what do you really think? (Just kidding, you’re right, of course)

  7. Vagrant Rightist says:
    April 29, 2022 at 10:52 pm

    I see these things as artificial limits the system, really Jews, create to stop people getting to where they need to go. As the left’s narrative obviously starts to unravel and lose credibility there’s a panic to run to the other end and plug the dam that’s about to break.

    I’m pretty sure I read somewhere that Dave Rubin drifted away from some aspects of the left because of the left’s ‘antisemitism’ about Israel, certainly not to save white people or the West. We see that a lot with Jews. The left stops holding up the flattering mirror Jews feel entitled to on this topic and Jews leave and become neocons instead. But in every other way, Rubin is clearly at the polar opposite end of what even normie conservatives believe in, he’s a homosexual Jew with an adopted child.

    The worst offender in this realm might be Jordan Peterson. He’s obviously very intelligent and so knows better, but he’s allowed himself to become incorrectly depicted as a symbol of radical dissent, when he’s anything but that. Sure he  sees and articulates some of the immediate problems with the left but will always redirect away from the correct solution back to libtardism. He is the number one way of selling this fake right to white people.

    Another person in this ‘intellectual dark web’ is this the Jew Bret Weinstein. He even calls his show ‘Dark Horse podcast’, so you really know you’re getting dangerous content. I saw a couple of these earlier in the year. He did have some reasonable points about covid and vaccines. He objects to having to accept men in women’s sports. He doesn’t like some of the extreme wokeism of the left. People like Weinstein obviously saw themselves as part of the left at some point and now feel excluded from much of its discourse. But that’s as far as it goes. Their interest is squarely in maintaining liberal, multicultural diverse societies not declaring them as failed states.

     

    So you have these constructions, these fake limits, these gatekeepers on discourse steering you back to the center. They are either Jews or saying things that Jews want to hear, and they are given priority placement on youtube and elsewhere in the media to give the impression they are ‘breaking through’ the speech strictures the left have imposed and delivering refreshing truth. And for quite a number of people they probably are effective distractions, “Now we’re really giving it to those libs with Dave Rubin”. um…

    Can these people be used as a gateway drug to us ? I don’t know, maybe. But they are there as a barrier. Perhaps some will get to us that way. Probably for every 1 that gets to our full truth, 100 might be content to stay with this bullshit. It says a part of what they want to hear and comes with far less of the risks.

    But we must never allow ourselves to be satisfied with the left’s claim that Peterson or Rubin are ‘nazis’. We don’t even know how much of that is genuine deluded hysteria and how much of it is actually noise designed to wrongly bolster the positions of these people as ‘dangerous thinkers’ in the normy mind. Either way it has that effect.

  8. Nick Jeelvy says:
    April 29, 2022 at 11:58 pm

    I agree with everything said in this article and the commenters are right to point out that these people are not white, majority Jewish and dishonest, but I think the most devastating criticism that can be levied at them all is that they are boring.

  9. G J T says:
    April 30, 2022 at 9:38 am

    “The only path forward is white identity politics”

     

    More specifically, the only path forward (that has a proven record of success rather than continuous failure) is white identity politics built on the foundation of Jesus Christ,  rediscovering our collective identity as the singular race made in the image of God.

    Secular WN politics have not accomplished a single thing for the white race in over half a century, and the failures only become more decisive and spectacular as time goes on. As long as European people continue to turn away from God and allow the literal sons of Satan to not only define for them what a Christian is, but co-opt our very identity, this will not change.

    Western civilization was built as it was because its architects understood their role as the true chosen people of God, the spiritual transcendence of our race, and were therefore operating under God’s grace and divine might.

    Christian identity is the ONLY solution, with the ONLY real answers to the questions pertaining to the destruction of our people and civilization.

    White man, YOU alone are the earthly representation of God Almighty, and until our race collectively embraces this formerly widely-understood truth, the downward spiral will continue unabated.

    1. Aben Boer says:
      April 30, 2022 at 3:28 pm

      Christian Identity is the product of people desperately trying to reconcile the obvious contradictions between Christianity and White identity. Christianity is an individualist, globalist religion that was created and spread by the very same people who are most responsible for white decline. White identitarian Christians can’t accept this obvious fact so they twist themselves into logical pretzels as they struggle to serve two masters and claiming “we’re the real Jews after all” is the sad, delusional product.

      1. Lord Shang says:
        April 30, 2022 at 9:39 pm

        There is no contradiction between Christianity and white identitarianism. You have fully bought into the enemy’s propaganda. Divorcing white survival from the historic Faith guarantees white extinction (and that is a sociological not theological assertion).

        1. Aben Boer says:
          May 1, 2022 at 8:16 am

          “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

          -Galatians 3:28

          I’m not sure how anyone can read that verse and interpret it as support for nationalism or any other kind of racial or ethnic preservation. Not only does it downplay the distinction between Jews and non-Jews, it asserts that they don’t truly exist at all. Christians were denying the existence of white people (or at least the Greek subset of white people) hundreds of years before progressives even existed. If any other Jewish man were promoting this message, nationalists would see it for what it is and dismiss it on the spot. Christians *can’t* dismiss it though, because the Jewish author of that verse was an apostle that their religion venerates.

          1. Jim Goad says:
            May 1, 2022 at 9:42 am

            The only national identitarianism in The Bible is in the Old Testament, and it has nothing to do with whites.

            The New Testament is explicitly universalistic, which probably has something to do with the statistical fact that the global Christian population is majority nonwhite.

          2. Lord Shang says:
            May 1, 2022 at 3:51 pm

            You are confused about a lot of theological things. I’m ill in an ongoing way, and not really up to an extended debate on this. Bottom line: the famous verse you cite refers to what Christians believe is the spiritual essence of man. It’s proper interpretation, which must be seen in light of the “thought-world” of that time, is that Christ was a universal redeemer, meaning that anyone can attain salvation through Him, and that there are no earthly distinctions between sentient moral beings in Christ’s kingdom except those pertaining to the moral virtues. IOWs, whether you are elite or plebeian, man/woman, one race or tribe or another in this world does not matter to God. What matters, as a famous nonwhite American put it, is “the content of character”.

            This possibility of human brotherhood is a spiritual one. All persons regardless of specific historical condition are welcome to become brothers and sisters in Christ. This has nothing to do with pretending against evidence that we can all act as though we are literal (biological) siblings. Christ also famously said “my kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). All souls live their embodied lives in this world (ie, not Christ’s). Politics (which Christ never denounced or held to be unnecessary) for a Christian is about governing imperfect (sinful) persons in this material world; ultimately, about so arranging society in its forms and processes as to minimize physical pain, immorality and injustice (which can never be wholly eliminated, due to what Christians hold is the ontological ineradicability of human sinfulness absent the final perfecting grace of Christ at the Second Coming).

            A Christian politics is therefore resolutely non-utopian. It takes the world as it is, man as he is, and seeks such moral and functional improvements as are possible within multifold limits (biological, historical, economic, geographical, etc). Can a Christian be an aggressive nationalist? I don’t think so, for the same set of moral reasons that he cannot be an aggressive person (eg, if it’s evil for me to ‘raid’ your property or rape your woman when you’re a member of my tribe, there is no license to perpetrate these acts against others, simply for reasons of tribal difference). In this sense, perhaps, we can call Christianity a “liberalizing” creed.

            But does this mean a Christian has to renounce his own people, to pretend he does not have a ‘people’? I don’t see how that follows from universalistic moral edicts and prohibitions (“Thou shalt not kill, steal, etc”). Am I ‘evil’ for feeding my family before yours? That is to be expected as a function of my biological nature. Man (in the Christian understanding) is both biological and spiritual; each aspect of his being has its claims and needs. Man’s moral obligations flow out from him in a series of widening but also weakening concentric circles. The first duty of care is to God. The second duty is to family. The next is to neighbor (which is to be understood, in this very different transient and mobile age, genetically/tribally). Then more distant neighbor, and so on. By the time we reach some random person, totally distinct from us (racially, ethnopsychologically, geographically, religiously), on the other side of the world, our only obligations are negative, as understood by libertarians – do no harm.

            A Christian never has moral license to hurt another person except in legitimate self-defense, nor to be cruel. But such negative obligations are hardly moral imperatives for the kinds of racially suicidal acts of collective self-abnegation that (mostly non-Christian, but also some misguided Christian) liberals impose upon innocent whites. It is not “Christian” to force white nations to accept masses of racially alien (not to mention often statistically behaviorally repulsive) “migratory imperialists”, thereby destroying whites’ collective ‘family’ home(land)s. Nor is it “Christian” to lie, in this case, about the facts of racial differentiation and their societal consequences. Nor is it remotely “Christian” for a white liberal traitor to “bear false witness” merely because he is doing so against his own race. Nor does it follow theologically that white Christians must associate with nonwhites (as opposed again to merely not harming them), especially outside of church services (where a strong case against mandatorily segregated services can be made).

            Despite the occasionally breathless rhetoric of some overheated, overly isolated theologians, “all on fire for Christ”, Christianity in fact is a reasonable Faith, at least wrt the material things of this world. You don’t have to be a saint to be saved. You just have to acknowledge Christ, and work at being a good person. And you are absolutely not being ‘saintly’ when you are a liberal indulging your own mental illness by advancing, often coercively, the illegitimate or at least morally unimperative material interests of aliens at the expense of the legitimate, or at least not-illegitimate, material interests of your own people.

            Christianity is not “liberalism + God”.  Liberalism is not “Christianity – God”.

            White preservationists really have to come en masse to recognize this.

             

        2. Saturday Night Palsy says:
          May 2, 2022 at 3:06 pm

          Quoting Lord Sheng — Man’s moral obligations flow out from him in a series of widening but also weakening concentric circles. The first duty of care is to God. The second duty is to family. The next is to neighbor (which is to be understood, in this very different transient and mobile age, genetically/tribally). Then more distant neighbor, and so on. By the time we reach some random person, totally distinct from us (racially, ethnopsychologically, geographically, religiously), on the other side of the world, our only obligations are negative, as understood by libertarians – do no harm.

          Quoting Julian Langella — Patriotism stems from the Fourth Commandment: “Honor your father and your mother.” The Catechism teaches that this commandment “indicates the order of charity.” This order of propriety is the direct result of the limit given by God to human nature, which is not able to love everyone at the same time. “As you cannot be useful to everyone,” writes Saint Augustin, “you must especially care for those who, according to time and place or other opportunities, are more closely united to you by a certain fate.”

           In 1939, in the encyclical Summi pontifactus, Pope Pius XII confirms and recalls this principle: “In exercising charity there exists an order established by God, according to which one must show a more intense love and do good in preference to those to whom one is united by special bonds.” Yes, even in love there is a hierarchy . . . .

          This order of charity is not a recent intellectual construction. On the contrary, this principle is stated very clearly by Saint Paul in his first epistle to Timothy: “If anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for his own family, he has disowned the faith and is worse than an unbeliever” (1 Timothy 5:8). 

          Saint Thomas Aquinas tell us also that respect for the fourth commandment is an act of piety: “Just as it is fitting to religion to render veneration to God, likewise on a second level it is fitting to piety to render veneration to parents and the homeland . . . . In the veneration of the homeland is included the veneration of fellow citizens and of all the homeland’s friends.”

          Pope Leo XIII wrote that “natural law commands us to love with preference and devotion that country where we are born and where we have been raised to the point that the good citizen does not fear to face death for his homeland.” Love always has a hierarchy.

          Saint Pius X, his successor, drives the nail home: “Yes, it is worthy not only of love, but of predilection, the homeland whose sacred name awakens the most cherished memories and makes the very fibers of your soul tremble, this common land where your cradle was rocked, attached by ties of blood and this other more noble community of affection and traditions.”  Yes, you read that correctly: “ties of blood.”

          As for Pius XI, in 1922, he celebrates “this love of his homeland and his race, a powerful source of many virtues and acts of heroism when it is ruled by Christian law.”

          Therefore, the Church realizes the basic truth that patriotism is a virtue of preference.  The popes and the Church’s greatest men of wisdom have always taught this.  The history of France and of Europe is full of saints who placed their whole life under the sign of this virtue of love.

    2. Lord Shang says:
      April 30, 2022 at 9:37 pm

      I share your concern for our racial survival and wellbeing, but your statements are not Christian. Christianity does not allege white superiority, nor mandate white perpetuity. Nor is it hostile to white preservation, either. One can be an orthodox Christian and a white preservationist. There is no moral contradiction or discrepancy between the two positions. There is therefore no need to futilely attempt to rewrite the Faith; rather, we must unearth and highlight the ethical non–mandatoriness of the policy of coercively diversifying white homelands.

      1. G J T says:
        May 1, 2022 at 8:09 am

        My adherence to CI has zero to do with trying to reconcile a perceived, false contradiction between Christianity and white identity. A century+ of Jewish subversion and reconfiguration of the fundamental Christian doctrine has led not only evangelical Zionists into great confusion about the scripture and history of the faith, but white identitarian Christians have arrived at a place of similar confusion. The Christian WN does indeed face difficult propositions when it comes to squaring their faith and their politics, where elements of each compromise the other, leading to confusion and ambiguities that do not actually exist in scripture. I’ve seen it time and time again, and to wiggle out of this predicament they say “just don’t mix your faith and your politics.” A nonsensical notion if ever there was one. This dilemma of reconciling the two is not one related to scripture itself, but to the individual’s misunderstanding of it. These same WN Christians routinely fail to interpret the true meaning of vitally relevant words used over and over in scripture. Basic stuff.

        In actuality, no, there is no need to reconcile white identity and Christianity, because as our ancestors understood, they are part of the same foundation and inseparably bound together.

        Christian identity is not re-writing the faith — it’s discovering thousands of years of demographic migration and returning to the Christianity our ancestors understood to be true, all verified by scripture. God said His people would forget who they were and consequently experience all the misfortune and misery that has befallen us. Using the OT only to reinforce *certain* NT messages, while ignoring all others because they’re unpalatable, is not sound doctrine. You embrace it in totality or you’re working from an established position and using scripture to conform that said position. Similar to how leftists do politics in general.

        CI is the *least* arrogant and prideful of all Christian faiths, because CI surrenders to the will of God with ZERO reservations, does not question the will of God or try to apply human “logic” onto Him. We read scripture exactly how it is written and with humility express infinite gratitude towards our Creator. Trying to “reconcile” anything in this context, or any, is to attempt to question why God does what he does, and to employ human emotion in discerning the will of God.

        Just out of curiosity, have you ever sincerely researched the arguments for CI? If not I’d be happy to cite some resources where an abundance of this information can be found.

        1. Aben Boer says:
          May 1, 2022 at 1:54 pm

          “Christian identity is not re-writing the faith — it’s discovering thousands of years of demographic migration and returning to the Christianity our ancestors understood to be true, all verified by scripture. God said His people would forget who they were and consequently experience all the misfortune and misery that has befallen us.”

          Yes, it is. You’re appropriating someone’s else’s faith and claiming it as your own. White people are *not* descendants of the original Israelites but Jonathon Greenblatt is. I’ve seen zero evidence to support the CI claim that Europeans are descended from Israelites and I believe you’re forced to deny it because you (correctly) interpret the Bible as a Jewish supremacist text and you want to be on the winning team. The problem I’m trying to highlight is that you wouldn’t have been backed into this corner if not for Christianity. Christianity made you fall in love with someone else’s history and CI is tempting to you because it gives you an opportunity to delude yourself into thinking that Yahweh chose you when he clearly didn’t.

          1. Lord Shang says:
            May 1, 2022 at 4:31 pm

            Even from the perspective of traditionalist theology (which I wouldn’t altogether accept even if I became a Christian believer again), there is nothing special about the Jews post-Resurrection. They are now just another ethnic group (Christian Zionism is nothing more than another weird Christianistic cult, like the Mormons). “The Church is Israel now.”

        2. Lord Shang says:
          May 1, 2022 at 4:27 pm

          No, I confess I’ve not studied CI, and would be willing to read some of the better materials (if I live past this summer, which I probably will, but might not). I myself am a true philosophical agnostic (completely openminded, unable to decide if I believe in anything supernatural at all or not), but I grew up in a serious Christian home, albeit in what seems to be an expiring creed (“Old Anglicanism”), at least in the West (Third World, esp. African, Anglicans are very traditionalist and vigorous). I’m sympathetic to (and interested in) intellectual Catholicism. I’m not Pentecostal or evangelical in background at all.

          I don’t mean to be antagonistic, but from everything I’ve heard or read, CI seems to me to be a racial cult – a manufactured way to try to have a Faith which is racially positive for whites, as opposed to the racially harmful, globalist garbage that is spewed in one form or another by nearly all the churches today. However, my stance is that it is precisely that globalist intellectual pollution that needs to be theologically defenestrated and then excised from Church teaching – and that this task can be done (that it hasn’t continues to surprise me, testifying yet again to the global intellectual homogenization that seems to be a dominant, if somewhat difficult to explain, feature of the contemporary world).

  10. Bernie says:
    April 30, 2022 at 11:07 am

    There have indeed been several new rights. The last one was in the 70s and early 80s and they helped elect Reagan, started the Heritage Foundation, the Christian Coalition and several other organizations that still exist in one form or another. While they had some allowance for racial activism (they supported anti-busing protests and were anti-affirmative action) they never grasped the reality of race or (more likely) were scared of race. Hence, they did absolutely nothing to stop the leftist onslaught. A lesson for those on the dissident right who want to ignore the reality of race.

Comments are closed.

If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.

Note on comments privacy & moderation

Your email is never published nor shared.

Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.

  • Recent posts

    • Black Invention Myths

      Black Invention Myths

    • Race War in the Outback

      Jim Goad

      21

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 7 More of the Most Common Jobs for Psychopaths

      James Dunphy

    • Black History Month Resources

      Greg Johnson

      5

    • 40% Off Selected Titles

      Cyan Quinn

      5

    • The Union Jackal, January 2023

      Mark Gullick

      3

    • Spencer J. Quinn’s The No College Club: A Review

      Anthony Bavaria

      6

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 521 Daily Zoomer & Spencer J. Quinn Discuss The No College Club

      Counter-Currents Radio

      1

    • Everything Whites Do Is Bad . . . According to the Mainstream Media

      Beau Albrecht

      12

    • Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio

      Margot Metroland

      6

    • American Krogan on Louis C. K. Advocating for Open Borders

      American Krogan

      11

    • Traditional French Songs from Le Poème Harmonique

      Alex Graham

      1

    • The Worst Week Yet: January 22-28, 2023

      Jim Goad

      25

    • Sports Cars & Small Penises

      Richard Houck

      29

    • Opiates for America’s Heartland

      Morris van de Camp

      11

    • The Whale

      Steven Clark

      3

    • Are Qur’an-Burnings Helpful?

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      15

    • Bullet Train to Babylon

      Trevor Lynch

      7

    • The Wave: Fascism Reenacted in a High School

      Beau Albrecht

      6

    • Edred Thorsson a jeho kniha Historie Runové gildy

      Collin Cleary

    • Silicon Valley’s Anti-White Racial Dysgenics Program

      Jason Kessler

      31

    • The Silent Plague of Elderly Asian Mass Shooters in California

      Jim Goad

      36

    • What Went Wrong with America’s Universities?

      Stephen Paul Foster

      3

    • Greg Johnson Speaks to Horus the Avenger About Charles Krafft

      Greg Johnson

      5

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 6 The Most Common Jobs for Psychopaths

      James Dunphy

      13

    • Davos, or the Technocrats’ Ball

      Mark Gullick

      5

    • A Political Prisoner on the Meaning of January 6

      Morris van de Camp

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 520 Inside Serbia with Marko of Zentropa

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • The $50 Million Conservative Inc. Internet Spat

      Spencer J. Quinn

      15

    • Yet Another Woke Remake of a Classic

      Beau Albrecht

      25

    • Spencer J. Quinn & Pox Populi Discuss The No College Club

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 4: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • The Worst Week Yet: January 15-21, 2023

      Jim Goad

      35

    • Q&A with Jim Goad on The Redneck Manifesto

      Jason Kessler

      3

    • Against Political Hipsterism

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      6

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 3: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • Against White Unionism

      Greg Johnson

      7

    • Hitchcock vs. Visconti

      Derek Hawthorne

      9

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 2: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • Public Transit in Multicultural Hell

      Gunnar Alfredsson

      12

    • No, You Wasn’t Kings

      Jim Goad

      36

    • The 2022 Counter-Currents Fall Retreat James Edwards & Sam Dickson on White Nationalism in Electoral Politics

      James Edwards & Sam Dickson

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 1: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

      1

    • On the Christian Question

      David Lewis

      78

    • Physician, Heal Thyself: The Persecution of Jordan Peterson

      Mark Gullick

      22

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 5 The Workplace

      James Dunphy

      1

    • The Secret of My Success

      Steven Clark

      2

    • We Are All Mr. Bridge

      Spencer J. Quinn

      26

    • Wokeism’s Loyal Evangelical Subjects

      Robert Hampton

      21

    • The Lie of Afrocentrism

      Morris van de Camp

      22

  • Classics Corner

    • Remembering A. R. D. “Rex” Fairburn (February 2, 1904–March 25, 1957)

      Greg Johnson

      1

    • Denis Kearney & the Struggle for a White America

      Theodore J. O'Keefe

      1

    • Posthuman Prospects:
      Artificial Intelligence, Fifth Generation Warfare, & Archeofuturism

      Christopher Pankhurst

      5

    • Earnest Sevier Cox:
      Advocate for the White Ethnostate

      Morris van de Camp

      15

    • Remembering Jack London
      (January 12, 1876–November 22, 1916)

      Greg Johnson

      2

    • Remembering Robinson Jeffers:
      January 10, 1887–January 20, 1962

      John Morgan

      3

    • Remembering Pierre Drieu La Rochelle:
      January 3, 1893–March 15, 1945

      Greg Johnson

    • Remembering Rudyard Kipling (December 30, 1865-January 18, 1936)

      Greg Johnson

      10

    • Restoring White Homelands

      Greg Johnson

      34

    • Remembering Hinton Rowan Helper

      Spencer J. Quinn

      11

    • What’s Wrong with Diversity?

      Greg Johnson

      10

    • Redefining the Mainstream

      Greg Johnson

      3

    • Edward Alsworth Ross:
      American Metapolitical Hero

      Morris van de Camp

      8

    • The Talented Mr. Ripley & Purple Noon

      Trevor Lynch

      19

    • Christmas & the Yuletide:
      Light in the Darkness

      William de Vere

      3

    • Thanksgiving Special 
      White Men Meet Indians:
      Jamestown & the Clash of Civilizations

      Thomas Jackson

    • Colin Wilson’s The Outsider

      Sir Oswald Mosley

      4

    • Dostoyevsky on the Jews

      William Pierce

      4

    • Jefferson &/or Mussolini, Part 1

      Ezra Pound

      5

    • I Listened to Chapo Trap House So You Don’t Have To

      Doug Huntington

      98

    • The Homeric Gods

      Mark Dyal

      13

    • Toward a Baltic-Black Sea Union:
      “Intermarium” as a Viable Model for White Revival

      Émile Durand

      55

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 3

      John Morgan

      30

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 2

      John Morgan

      6

    • Columbus Day Special
      The Autochthony Argument

      Greg Johnson

      9

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 1

      John Morgan

      8

    • The Jewish Question for Normies

      Alan Smithee

      13

    • Human Biodiversity for Normies

      Alan Smithee

      10

    • Bring Back Prohibition!

      Alan Smithee

      65

    • Ethnonationalism for Normies
      (Or, “On the Sense of Coming Home”)

      Alan Smithee

      8

  • Paroled from the Paywall

    • The French Emperor, the German Nutcracker, & the Russian Ballet Part 2

      Kathryn S.

      4

    • The French Emperor, the German Nutcracker, & the Russian Ballet Part 1

      Kathryn S.

    • Death on the Nile (1978 & 2022)

      Trevor Lynch

      13

    • Error & Pride

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      12

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 515 The Christmas Special

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 514 The Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present, & Yet to Come on The Writers’ Bloc

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Race & the Bible

      Morris van de Camp

      2

    • PK van der Byl, African Statesman

      Margot Metroland

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 513 The Writers’ Bloc with Horus on the Implicit Whiteness of Liberalism

      Counter-Currents Radio

      4

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 512 Jim Goad on Answer Me!

      Counter-Currents Radio

      3

    • Cleese on Creativity

      Greg Johnson

      6

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 1 Diagnostic Criteria, Associated Personality Disorders, & Brain Attributes

      James Dunphy

      6

    • Death of a Gadfly:
      Plato’s Apology

      Mark Gullick

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 8:
      Ernesto Laclau & Left-Wing Populism

      Alain de Benoist

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 511
      Christmas Lore with Hwitgeard on The Writers’ Bloc

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Bringing Guns to an Idea Fight:
      The Career of Robert DePugh

      Morris van de Camp

      4

    • War Is Our Father

      Gunnar Alfredsson

    • The Foremost Threat to Life on Earth

      James Dunphy

      2

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 510
      The Writers’ Bloc with Jason Kessler on the Kanye Question

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 509
      New Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson

      Counter-Currents Radio

      6

    • The Problem of Gentile Zionism

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 7:
      Money & the Right

      Alain de Benoist

      2

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 6:
      Liberalism & Morality

      Alain de Benoist

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 507
      The Best Month Ever on The Writers’ Bloc with Anthony Bavaria

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Who Is Not Going to Save the Nation?

      Beau Albrecht

      4

    • J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Fall of Númenor

      Alex Graham

      3

    • The Most Overlooked Christmas Carols

      Buck Hunter

      4

    • Mirko Savage, Mother Europe’s Son

      Ondrej Mann

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 506
      The Writers’ Bloc with Jim Goad on J. D. Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy

      Counter-Currents Radio

      2

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 505
      Mark Weber on the Perils of Empire

      Counter-Currents Radio

      3

  • Recent comments

    • Antipodean

      Race War in the Outback

      Very droll.In fairness to my country-men though, many of the hybrid folk are quite charming, even to...

    • Vehmgericht

      Race War in the Outback

      I have a hunch that the cradle of modern Homo sapiens is not East Africa, as we are so frantically...

    • Greg Johnson

      40% Off Selected Titles

      If you have a question, write to [email protected]

    • Fred C. Dobbs

      Race War in the Outback

      We can’t expect Hollywood to portray them in a negative light. You’re correct. The few people I’ve...

    • J Webb

      Race War in the Outback

      Very worthwhile topic. We will see how cleverly Australia will handle this. Will they give in to...

    • Don

      Spencer J. Quinn’s The No College Club: A Review

      A  great step in the right direction. Good, idea driven  pro-White fiction, especially for young...

    • James Kirkpatrick

      Race War in the Outback

      Haha, true!  But I mean in real life, photographs and videos.  In other words, that is all...

    • Fire Walk With Lee

      Race War in the Outback

      "The aborigines call him Jabba-Jahda-Ah-Der-Ahd, which means The Crocodile Who Walks Like a Man."The...

    • Antipodean

      Race War in the Outback

      There are still some pure-blooded aboriginals alive today. They and we have certainly had no problem...

    • Antipodean

      Race War in the Outback

      The activists prefer “First Nations’ people”; I guess they picked that up at a conference with their...

    • Bob Roberts

      Race War in the Outback

      Clearly Australia needs some reasonable gun control laws.   "Their ghastly prehistoric...

    • Fred C. Dobbs

      Race War in the Outback

      They were portrayed in a positive light in the movie Crocodile Dundee. Mick Dundee even participated...

    • Vehmgericht

      Race War in the Outback

      Are the Australian Aboriginals truly modern Homo sapiens or a relict population of earlier hominids...

    • Uncle Semantic

      Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio

      I assume this movie was better than the Robert Zemeckis live-action one? Two Pinocchios in one ‘22...

    • Andrew Christopher

      Race War in the Outback

      Self-defense from Anarcho-Tyranny (e.g. elites using minority groups and 'refugees' as a battering...

    • Kenny Voi

      Race War in the Outback

      There are two types of people in this world: Those who descend from men who tried to take over the...

    • James Kirkpatrick

      Race War in the Outback

      I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a picture of one not squatting in the dirt, shuffling down a sidewalk...

    • James Kirkpatrick

      Race War in the Outback

      For those with eyes to see (or, rather, ears to hear), the juxtaposition tells a cruel truth; no...

    • davidcito

      Race War in the Outback

      "Some of these houses have 10-15 people sleeping on the floor of a three-bedroom house."  I...

    • Shift

      Race War in the Outback

      Just capitalize the "A" in Aborigine and they'll settle down in a jiffy.

  • Book Authors

    • Alain de Benoist
    • Anthony M. Ludovici
    • Beau Albrecht
    • Buttercup Dew
    • Charles Krafft
    • Christopher Pankhurst
    • Collin Cleary
    • F. Roger Devlin
    • Fenek Solère
    • Francis Parker Yockey
    • Greg Johnson
    • Gregory Hood
    • H. L. Mencken
    • Irmin Vinson
    • J. A. Nicholl
    • James J. O’Meara
    • Jef Costello
    • Jim Goad
    • Jonathan Bowden
    • Juleigh Howard-Hobson
    • Julius Evola
    • Kerry Bolton
    • Leo Yankevich
    • Michael Polignano
    • Multiple authors
    • Savitri Devi
    • Spencer J. Quinn
    • Tito Perdue
    • Trevor Lynch
  • Webzine Authors

    Contemporary authors

    • Howe Abbott-Hiss
    • Beau Albrecht
    • Aquilonius
    • Anthony Bavaria
    • Michael Bell
    • Alain de Benoist
    • Kerry Bolton
    • Jonathan Bowden
    • Buttercup Dew
    • Collin Cleary
    • Giles Corey
    • Jef Costello
    • Morris V. de Camp
    • F. Roger Devlin
    • Bain Dewitt
    • Jack Donovan
    • Ricardo Duchesne
    • Émile Durand
    • Guillaume Durocher
    • Mark Dyal
    • Guillaume Faye
    • Stephen Paul Foster
    • Fullmoon Ancestry
    • Jim Goad
    • Tom Goodrich
    • Alex Graham
    • Mark Gullick
    • Andrew Hamilton
    • Robert Hampton
    • Huntley Haverstock
    • Derek Hawthorne
    • Gregory Hood
    • Juleigh Howard-Hobson
    • Richard Houck
    • Alexander Jacob
    • Nicholas R. Jeelvy
    • Greg Johnson
    • Ruuben Kaalep
    • Tobias Langdon
    • Julian Langness
    • Travis LeBlanc
    • Patrick Le Brun
    • Trevor Lynch
    • Kevin MacDonald
    • G. A. Malvicini
    • John Michael McCloughlin
    • Margot Metroland
    • Millennial Woes
    • John Morgan
    • James J. O'Meara
    • Michael O'Meara
    • Christopher Pankhurst
    • Michael Polignano
    • J. J. Przybylski
    • Spencer J. Quinn
    • Quintilian
    • Edouard Rix
    • C. B. Robertson
    • C. F. Robinson
    • Hervé Ryssen
    • Kathryn S.
    • Alan Smithee
    • Fenek Solère
    • Ann Sterzinger
    • Thomas Steuben
    • Robert Steuckers
    • Tomislav Sunić
    • Donald Thoresen
    • Marian Van Court
    • Dominique Venner
    • Irmin Vinson
    • Michael Walker
    • Aylmer Wedgwood
    • Scott Weisswald
    • Leo Yankevich

    Classic Authors

    • Maurice Bardèche
    • Julius Evola
    • Ernst Jünger
    • D. H. Lawrence
    • Charles Lindbergh
    • Jack London
    • H. P. Lovecraft
    • Anthony M. Ludovici
    • Sir Oswald Mosley
    • National Vanguard
    • Friedrich Nietzsche
    • Revilo Oliver
    • William Pierce
    • Ezra Pound
    • Saint-Loup
    • Savitri Devi
    • Carl Schmitt
    • Miguel Serrano
    • Oswald Spengler
    • P. R. Stephensen
    • Jean Thiriart
    • John Tyndall
    • Francis Parker Yockey
  • Departments

    • Book Reviews
    • Movie Reviews
    • TV Reviews
    • Music Reviews
    • Art Criticism
    • Graphic Novels & Comics
    • Video Game Reviews
    • Fiction
    • Poems
    • Interviews
    • Videos
    • English Translations
    • Other Languages
      • Arabic
      • Bulgarian
      • Croatian
      • Czech
      • Danish
      • Dutch
      • Estonian
      • Finnish
      • French
      • German
      • Greek
      • Hungarian
      • Italian
      • Lithuanian
      • Norwegian
      • Polish
      • Portuguese
      • Romanian
      • Russian
      • Slovak
      • Spanish
      • Swedish
      • Ukrainian
    • Commemorations
    • Why We Write
  • Archives
  • Top 100 Commenters
Sponsored Links
Above Time Coffee Antelope Hill Publishing Paul Waggener IHR-Store Asatru Folk Assembly Breakey Imperium Press American Renaissance The Patrick Ryan Show Jim Goad The Occidental Observer
Editor-in-Chief
Greg Johnson
Books for sale
  • El Manifiesto Nacionalista Blanco
  • An Artist of the Right
  • Ernst Jünger
  • Reuben
  • The Partisan
  • Trevor Lynch’s Classics of Right-Wing Cinema
  • The Enemy of Europe
  • Imperium
  • Reactionary Modernism
  • Manifesto del Nazionalismo Bianco
  • O Manifesto Nacionalista Branco
  • Vade Mecum
  • Whiteness: The Original Sin
  • Space Vixen Trek Episode 17: Tomorrow the Stars
  • The Year America Died
  • Passing the Buck
  • Mysticism After Modernism
  • Gold in the Furnace
  • Defiance
  • Forever & Ever
  • Wagner’s Ring & the Germanic Tradition
  • Resistance
  • Materials for All Future Historians
  • Love Song of the Australopiths
  • White Identity Politics
  • Here’s the Thing
  • Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy
  • Graduate School with Heidegger
  • It’s Okay to Be White
  • The World in Flames
  • The White Nationalist Manifesto
  • From Plato to Postmodernism
  • The Gizmo
  • Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch’s CENSORED Guide to the Movies
  • Toward a New Nationalism
  • The Smut Book
  • The Alternative Right
  • My Nationalist Pony
  • Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right
  • The Philatelist
  • Confessions of an Anti-Feminist
  • East and West
  • Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come
  • White Like You
  • Numinous Machines
  • Venus and Her Thugs
  • Cynosura
  • North American New Right, vol. 2
  • You Asked For It
  • More Artists of the Right
  • Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics
  • The Homo & the Negro
  • Rising
  • The Importance of James Bond
  • In Defense of Prejudice
  • Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)
  • The Hypocrisies of Heaven
  • Waking Up from the American Dream
  • Green Nazis in Space!
  • Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country
  • Heidegger in Chicago
  • End of an Era: Mad Men & the Ordeal of Civility
  • Sexual Utopia in Power
  • What is a Rune? & Other Essays
  • Son of Trevor Lynch’s White Nationalist Guide to the Movies
  • The Lightning & the Sun
  • The Eldritch Evola
  • Western Civilization Bites Back
  • New Right vs. Old Right
  • Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations
  • The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity
  • I do not belong to the Baader-Meinhof Group
  • Pulp Fascism
  • The Lost Philosopher
  • Trevor Lynch’s A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies
  • And Time Rolls On
  • Artists of the Right: Resisting Decadence
  • North American New Right, Vol. 1
  • Some Thoughts on Hitler
  • Tikkun Olam and Other Poems
  • Summoning the Gods
  • Taking Our Own Side
  • Reuben
  • The Node
  • The New Austerities
  • Morning Crafts
  • The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories
Copyright © 2023 Counter-Currents Publishing, Ltd.

Paywall Access





Please enter your email address. You will receive mail with link to set new password.

Edit your comment