Counter-Currents
This Weekend’s Livestreams
Neil Kumar on Counter-Currents Radio
James O’Meara on The Writers’ Bloc
Greg Johnson
248 words
On Saturday, January 29, 2022, Greg Johnson and Robert Wallace welcome Arkansas candidate Neil Kumar to Counter-Currents Radio to discuss his candidacy as well as current events and YOUR QUESTIONS. Starting at noon PST, 3 pm EST, and 9 pm CET on:
- DLive: https://dlive.tv/Counter-Currents
- Odysee: https://odysee.com/@countercurrents/ccradio
- Send questions & donations to Entropy: entropystream.live/countercurrents
Sunday, January 30, 2022, Nick Jeelvy’s The Writers’ Bloc welcomes James O’Meara to discuss the Best Month Yet, i.e., the best of Counter-Currents this month. Starting 1 pm PST, 4 pm EST, and 10 pm CET on:
- DLive: https://dlive.tv/Counter-Currents
- Odysee: https://odysee.com/@countercurrents/ccradio
- Send questions & donations to Entropy: entropystream.live/countercurrents
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
29 comments
We can surmise his mother made one of her life’s greatest choices to repudiate her heritage, yet here, with her son, we are treated to him pretending to wear that heritage on his sleeve.
“pretending” – We’ve got a mind reader folks!
”on his sleeve” – His heritage is clearly on his suspenders and tie.
It’s cool though Robert P. , I’m sure your congressional campaign is going great!
If you want to shill for him, go ahead, but please not to me. I’m not interested. I’m not here to dally in your preferred mode of using words as weapons.
Maybe I should have expressed myself better, but the intent of my comment was more about the morality of his creepy appropriation of his mother’s heritage, treating it as if it were still a living thing he inherited from her, even though, I believe, she broke tradition by her reproductive choices. There’s a moribund odor to him dressing up that way.
Perhaps the deeper question is about how we understand the so-called “biracial.” The term implies a blend of two parental influences, as if getting an equal share of both, but their admixture represents a radical break with both heritages, for better or worse. At some point they should own up to the fact that they’re really a third group, something different and new.
Clearly, Robert P. is an unserious cad who doesn’t share our goals. For, if he did honestly and in good faith wish to see White Nationalism succeed in his lifetime, he would be throwing his full-throated support behind the only person in American politics who is explicitly fighting on behalf of White people. This ridiculous purity spiral one drop of blood conception is outlandish, and marks Robert P. as more of a LARPer than anything else. While you pull your hair out and use “creepy,” “moribund” language, we here at Counter-Currents will be working towards the achievement of serious political goals. The fact that one parent is nonwhite does not erase the pedigree of the other. I wonder how far your ancestry in this country traces back? Get over yourself. Look around you. We are in no position to reject the support of anyone. Lost in this silly point you’ve made is that Mr. Kumar isn’t even nonwhite. He’s half-White. That is a massive difference. You, Robert P., are the personification of the reason why we will continue to lose. Look at your childish schoolyard stubbornness in contrast to the warm embrace Mr. Kumar has received from movement leaders. That is why they are leaders—they are serious about our cause. You are most emphatically not.
I largely agree with what you are saying however the guy is mixed race that’s not one drop of blood spergery it’s just a fact he’s non white and women like his mother would happily mongrelize Europeans out of existence as long as they are getting some.
Spending a as much time as all of us do in the virtual realm, appreciating the gravity of what this guy has committed himself to, IRL, is easy to miss.
I appreciate and support him.
Same, Mr. James K. Thanks for listening, brother.
You got it, sir. I sure do like the direction y’all are going (i.e., PAC/think-tank). Excellent podcast today.
So proud to have your faith. We won’t let you down. Thank you.
Gad the Chad! Look forward to meeting you, man. Grateful for the great work you do for Counter-Currents. Many thanks.
Wow, that is some real juvenile intelligence on your part brother. He has the pedigree whether you acknowledge it or not.
I would be skeptical of anyone with a conflicting set of race identities right in their DNA. It’s the reason I don’t trust non-White migrants here who claim to love their new country more than the old one: even if they’re sincere, they can’t vouch for their children. Best examples, most jihadis in Europe are second generation and most 2nd gen non-Whites here are by voting pattern fully on board with the anti-White Democrat program.
But being unable to vouch for your children can cut another way. Mr Kumar carries two bloodlines but he can choose to identify with one (see next paragraph). And listening to him, that seems more than clear. He is not bound by his mother’s choices, whatever her awareness or motives.
How many Blacks rejected pro-Black Barack Obama, who identified completely with his African blood, just because his (self-loathing) mother was White? If his genetics were not “problematic” to them, because his identity & allegiance to them was clear, why not the same with Mr Kumar and our people?
I say, at least give the guy a chance. ‘Cause, by the way, I can think of no one since David Duke who has tried to gain political office as an upfront Pro White.
I couldn’t find any polls for the district primary, but if he could actually get into congress, even if the GOP applies a cordon sanitaire, it would be amazing to have someone in congress giving explicitly white nationalist speeches.
If you weren’t on the livestream with Neil on C-C Radio, listen to the replay.
Neil is /ourguy/.
A White Identity Nationalist movement that doesn’t make room for actual White Identity Nationalists isn’t a White Identity Nationalist movement.
It’s something else.
Who isn’t making room for actual white identity nationalists?? Is this guy pushing someone that is actually white and has the same ideals out of the way?? Is the guy that Kumar is running against a white identity nationalist??
‘Is this guy pushing someone that is actually white and has the same ideals out of the way?’
No.
‘Is the guy that Kumar is running against a white identity nationalist?’
No.
Hopefully, the first step taken by Neil will shame some 100% white people into standing up for their interests. Until then, he is our man in Arkansas.
Nobody can shame me.
I’m in 100% white agreement, Nick. Shoot me an email to set up a brief call. Big fan of your work. Look forward to meeting you this year, man.
Great show today, thanks for putting this out there. One thing Greg hit on with regards to the universities is going after the “nest.” Completely agree. But in tandem with the universities are the big cities. These are the biggest nests for the most ferocious birds so to speak. We can’t write them off. It is the key to what we want to achieve. I have always laughed at republican candidates who pander to the evangelicals for instance. I mean, evangelicals are never gonna vote for Hillary, or Biden. They are guaranteed votes for the party. They should be pandering to people with common sense who are more in the middle. Make the basic logical argument to these people and they won’t be able to refuse. We need progressive candidates on the right, and in that I mean regressive because that is the Bizarro world we live in today. We need to create a movement here in San Francisco, period. I don’t have the resources to do this, I need help. I need your help. The people are here, we just need to reach out to them.
Thanks, Matt. I agree. Greg has made a simple proposal for this:
Strip these universities completely of taxpayer funds. That is the way to go.
So well said, Doctor. Same goes for you JT and HT. I’m not going to attack any public pro-White figure for taking a contrary view (or for anything else) but Neil is fiercely committed to our cause. Of course, my “no punching rule” ends with Greg. There is no circumstance when punching Greg is advantageous to our cause. We have no stronger advocate. It is invariably the opposite of productive.
I am 100% White with blue eyes and blondish hair. I don’t have a conflict of judgement here. But this is a legitimate concern and Neil agrees it is a legitimate concern. That shows character.
Neil is only 24-25 as well. He has a lot of mileage left. Undergraduate of an elite university and only one year left in law school at the University of Arkansas. At the least, we need good lawyers. If you were in trouble simply for being pro-white would you want Neil to represent you or not? It’s a good analogy for the entire situation. Listen to the podcast with an open mind and decide for yourself about his virtues. My position was made clear on the show and I’m not going to engage in charitable endorsements. He has a matrilineal American lineage of 400 years and he’s a rightful Sons of Confederate Veterans member, embraced wholeheartedly by Confederate leaders, including James Edwards and Keith Alexander.
I didn’t want to barge in at the end but THANK YOU TO ALL THE DONORS. It’s impossible to overstate our gratitude to you.
Thought this was a fantastic show. The best yet I’ve been a part of. Big praise to Neil for a great performance.
Keep in mind the man is only 24-25 as well.
He sounded much more mature than that. Mr Kumar is openly advocating for White interests, and I’ll support anyone who will do so.
I’m in the same camp, Stephen. If someone reflects well on us and moves us closer to our goal of organizing Whites into a powerful force, I support that person. It isn’t complicated.
But to clarify, when I say “we should do this” and “we should do that” I’m referring to the policy institute and a central strategy of the pro-white movement. If people want to respectfully hold down a harder position to the right, that’s not a bad thing. We need groups to hold people like Paul Gosar accountable when they make horrendous statements like this:
https://gosar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2085
I won’t be fierce to Paul Gosar types but they need to be fiercely criticized for this by somebody. At the same time, I don’t fault American Renaissance for skipping out on a “certain issue.” It’s a tactic with sound reason behind it for them. We are working at different frequencies on the same wavelength. It is my opinion that the “no more brother wars” axiom should apply to our pro-white movement.
Since the objective of my position is to appeal to the 85% of Republican voters who hold pro-white sentiment, I have to be careful about who I publicly associate for risk of alienating that audience. The polling on Jewish power isn’t there for these people yet. But if people are effective at promoting awareness and support of White advocacy, we’re friends on my end.
I don’t believe we can call ourselves proper White Nationalists if we didn’t take this guy with a huge grain of salt. All else I can say is: “We’ll see.”
I do think it is wise to be cautious, but we can’t always be jumping at shadows either. If Mr Kumar can get out a pro-White message, then that’s a win in my book. Remember a few years ago when the Dalai Lama said ‘Europe belongs to Europeans’ ? That’s was a huge propaganda win for native Europeans and Whites everywhere. Who on the left was going to call the Dalai Lama a racist ?
I do understand your position though.
Fair enough, Vauqelin! I’ve made the nuances of my position clear on this now and I’m certainly not going to oppose anyone who takes a harder stance. Intelligent WN hardliners and intelligent WN who have a one eye on winning over the receptive audience in Middle America are fine by me. If we are respectful to one another, I don’t see that as a problem. We are not compromising WN first principles. Different frequencies, same wavelength. No more brother wars. The ideal is a 100% White society. My allegiance belongs to our people.
Zionists don’t even openly criticize Rabbi Yosef for calling gentiles cattle. Respectful debate is welcome and necessary in our ranks as far as I’m concerned and differences are often best kept private. The pragmatic, unified Left have been winners and the moralistic, in-fighting Right have been losers. Look at the South today. There is nothing good about losing. We are facing a Camp of the Saints apocalypse if we do not organize Whites into a powerful political force. I advise people to always keep “what losing looks like” in mind.
I’m also not going to indulge in sermonizing of “that’s not who we are!” It’s not an attack on anyone personally and I haven’t seen this from anyone in the Counter-Currents community. But that’s counter-productive in my opinion. For one, it projects weakness, which is never a good look. It’s not that I won’t disassociate myself with certain rhetoric but I’m not going to “disavow” and attack anyone who is doing or has done good work as a law-abiding advocate for our people. I don’t see how that would be conducive to the goals of this position. We intend to build the central institution in our movement. I will do my best to be at least privately on good terms with all White advocates.
As far as verbally attacking pseudo-patriots when it gives us an advantage, that is a different story. Many to choose from and I thoroughly enjoy being on the offensive. Being aggressively opposed to the right people at the right time is a beautiful thing. Revisit the Trump primary for that lesson.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZmV7o1Efm4tW/
100% is a bit optimistic. While we’re talking about Zionists, one of them said, “In the framework of the permanent solution, we aspire to reach, first and foremost, the State of Israel as a Jewish state, at least 80% of whose citizens will be, and are, Jews.” Must have been one of those hard right jignats? Maybe even Meir Kahane, himself? Nope, it was Yitzchak Rabin, pretty much a demi-god for the Israeli left. Even left wing Zionists sound like alt-right talking points. So based on Rabin’s quote, I think at least 80% is a number to aspire to.
I think Kumar will have good optics as someone who is half-white and openly advocating for white interests. The media is going to look extremely silly calling this person a white supremacist. Can you imagine AOC et al. trying to call this guy a white supremacist in the House of Representatives? The optics of a half white half Indian American advocating for white Americans is fighting fire with fire. Also, Arkansas people Indians, especially North Indians, are also Indo-European.
I too am amazed at Kumar’s age. I just assume he was older than me because he’s running for office but he has a very calm and intellectual demeanor.
Right. “Ideal” being the keyword there. I believe in a future 100% white ethnostate but God knows when or how that will happen. It’s a good thing to have an “impossible” dream in the back of your mind. But it doesn’t calculate into my calendar this month.
This is a massive country. The important thing is that we take political precedence in our own nations (wow, how extreme) and our interests are not on the negotiating table. The rest will take care of itself. I agree with all of Greg’s policy proposals, which I think immunizes me from any questions over mettle.
Sharp analysis on Neil. I agree.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment