Print this post Print this post

Bait Bricks

1,518 words

There is a fascination with seemingly random piles of bricks showing up at riots unlawful assemblies protests benefit balls in major cities across the United States. To the eagle-eyed observer, pallets of blunt objects appearing in the line of planned marches and gatherings is just a little too convenient — and concerning — to brush away as a coincidence. The phenomenon has been observed, mostly by those in attendance at these “peaceful gatherings,” in Dallas, New York, Boston, and indubitably other places that haven’t received as much traction on Twitter.

The people informing us of these “bait bricks” aren’t exactly sympathetic types. The Dallas man is a protestor, and in the case of the Boston man, some kind of Trump-supporting rapper. (Twitter is a weird place.) The New York Tweet came directly from the police department itself, which immediately raises questions about the video’s credibility. Can we trust any of these people and their often wildly different narratives about the magic flagstones? The events of the last week have made deep rifts in American society visible once more, and violence underscored them. These magic bricks and who is placing them aren’t that important, in the grand scheme of things. There are traps laid for us in every direction that these peculiar dead-drops are discussed — accusing “antifa” radicals of placing them is a convenient way to pass the buck of violence back onto whitey, and to suggest it’s the act of the police or state in order to legitimize greater use of force against the protestors seems rather unlikely. We know what the police force of each city is willing to do, because they’ve done it every night for the past two weeks.

Consider the position of the protestor. Any action taken against them by the police will be decried as fascism incarnate, brutality, the whole laundry list of offenses. It is important to bear in mind that almost all Black Lives Matter protestors are in favor of complete police abolition; to them, their enemy during these tumultuous times is inherently illegitimate. To that effect, it is difficult to determine what’s factual and what’s ideological about their narratives, as they have every reason to paint all police action as violence.

Now, consider the position of the people in charge of these cities, and of the police enforcing curfews. Almost every leader facing riots in their cities has paid some kind of lip service to the Black Lives Matter movement or against “injustice” broadly. They also insist upon peace, or some variant of it. Most haven’t called in the National Guard, New York being a prime example. As the mayor of a Democratic-voting city, one has to play a sketchy game of maintaining some kind of order without alienating your coalition of minorities and your (often) mostly white constituency, many of whom would balk at any kind of constructive action being taken to quell mass civil unrest at their doorsteps.

The solution, in this case, is to let the situation simmer.

You can buy The World in Flames: The Shorter Writings of Francis Parker Yockey

I must confess these protests have become much less entertaining in the last few days. Where before there was always some kind of hilarious or dramatic event happening every night, there is now a tepid protest, some uninspired looting (when will they hit Fry’s Electronics?), and then the whole thing gets shut down at around 1 or 2 AM. This is true of semi-well-behaved cities; in places where things actually got out of hand, the situation resolved to this arrangement within a few days. If you allow this unrest to chug along at an even clip, it means that there’s a lot of room to peddle misinformation, make symbolic concessions, and otherwise tire out these people. The energy seen in Minneapolis the first two days, with its glorious blazes and post-apocalyptic mornings, cannot be sustained without some kind of constant galvanizing force. It is that force these protests lack by virtue of their demographic whackiness and general disorganization.

In a sane society, this unrest would not have happened — and even if it did, it would either be put down with a vengeance or the grievance in question would be so outrageous that the situation would have flashed into a proper civil war by now. Nobody in charge actually wants this. The United States is functioning much like an empire would — there is cold, hard Realpolitiking going on out in the streets of America. It may seem as though there’s some kind of civil war brewing, especially when you consider the seemingly diametrically opposed viewpoints of the news media, large corporations, and the President. Even then, this semi-apparent solidarity is more a deck played in the culture war than any substantial action; something that a lot of people are noticing. This is no consolation, though. Even if companies and mayors don’t tangibly support this cause, they’re still complicit in distorting culture, and they don’t even have a good reason for it beyond attempting to scrape up some feel-good bucks with their virtue-signaling.

Let’s get back to those bricks.

The general reaction to them has been outrage. No matter who is being accused, and no matter who is doing the accusing, the common thread is a (nominal) opposition to violence. You can hear the same denouncements in the mainstream media, by public-facing BLM speakers, by the President, even by police officers (who often take a knee for the photo op, then go back to doing their job moments later.) If you ask the average Leftist, these bricks were staged by either police or white supremacist boogeymen looking to spur violence. If you ask the Jew-approved “Right,” these bricks were staged by Antifa boogeymen looking to spur violence.

There’s just one problem with that. Violence doesn’t occur within a vacuum. These pallets of bricks have shown up because someone is willing to throw them. We know someone is willing to throw them. Be disgusted at political violence all you want; but the fact of the matter is that the United States is no longer a sane society, and no matter your political affiliation, the temptation to resort to insane tactics is hard to resist. Hand a well-adjusted man a gun and tell him to shoot, and he will hand it back to you. Hand a man with a grudge a gun, and you might bear witness to murder.

A common expression among geopolitical commentators (and other charlatans) the world over is that someone, or some group, has “exploited” ethnic or religious tensions. Someone has capitalized, galvanized, stoked, what have you, some kind of conflict that this commentator would like you to believe doesn’t exist. Conflict cannot be conjured up out of anywhere, though. When told that the civil war that tore his homeland apart was due to American intelligence “exploiting” tensions in the Balkans, our own Nicholas Jeelvy reminded us that these tensions had already spelled conflict for decades, the Americans be damned. If there is some kind of “fault line” to prod at for political ends, such fault line was already extant. It’s difficult to incite war among people who don’t have any reasons to bicker with each other.

Well, Americans have a lot of reasons to bicker with each other. We’re also being denied a much-needed split from each other owing to some irreconcilable differences. We’re being denied this by our government, global corporations, and some less-than-effective “protest” leaders, all because the American Empire is a pretty goddamn profitable machine to run and they don’t want to let go of the reins just yet. Virtue-signaling in favor of BLM is appeasement, and a step closer to a white-dispossessed banana republic where rents can be extracted on the altar of inclusiveness and post-colonial reparations. Nobody should be shocked that there is fighting in the streets, and that some boys are loading up on guns (and bringing their friends.) If we can’t even pelt each other with bricks until a gentleman’s agreement can be brokered, then what do we have to resolve our conflicts?

The stated goals of Black Lives Matter are substantially about the need for black people to be responsible for and care for their own. In their eyes, whites have been brutalizing oppressors. I’m not one to deny another person’s lived experience, even if I think that they’re wrong — I just propose we call it a day and stop the madness now, and decide that multiculturalism is a mistake that will inevitably lead to resentment and anger.

Until that day comes, there will continue to be random bricks in the streets. And there will continue to be people who want to throw them. Who cares who left them there?

If you want to support our work, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every Friday.

Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.



  1. Don
    Posted June 3, 2020 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    Who cares who left them there?

    Are you serious?

    Whomever left them there is guilty of conspiracy to riot, insurrection, etc. These represent the financial support of the ringleaders. Prosecute them…for starters. That should be easy to do. There are license numbers on vehicles delivering these materials. These riots are not spontaneous. They’re organized by “ringleaders.”

    Check out this transcript of a Press Conference given by Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and others on May 30, 2020 at 2:00 a.m. (Central Time) in which they describe carefully organized leadership using Improvised Explosive Devices (IED), gunfire, etc. The governor has been coordinating with the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. None of this has otherwise appeared in the MSM. Every person needs to read this transcript. Rare honesty.

    Among other things, this is what Gov. Walz said about the situation:

    “I spoke early this morning with the Secretary of Defense, Esper, and with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Milley, extensively to update on the situation, receive their situation report as they’re seeing it across the country, and to suggest courses of action of going forward. In consultation with the mayors and the resources they have …And just to be very clear as you witness this, whether it be New York, or Denver, or Louisville, or Las Vegas, there is no mayor in America that has the resources to push back on an organized attempt to destabilize civil society with no regard for life or property.”

    “They are being fed by professionals in this and professional tactics in urban warfare, those types of things are happening with these people.”

    John Harrington, commissioner of the Dept. of Public Safety:
    “John Harrington: (23:20)
    “We had multiple shots fired in both cities coming out of the rioters group. We had officers and national guard officers, national guard men and women shot at. We had improvised explosive devices used to injure state troopers, DNR, and others. We saw them break into post offices and we saw them try and destroy not only public property, but repeatedly set fires to private property with absolutely no…”

    John Harrington: (25:26)
    “We have watched these groups grow both in craziness and we’ve watched them also grow in challenging approaches that we have had to adapt to. We have watched them take on efforts where literally there are 5000 of them surrounding a building, trashing the building, and then when confronted running back under the cover of darkness into residential areas. We have watched them try and destroy downtowns.”

    Read the entire transcript. It’s only 8,689 words. Lots of good intel here.

    According to the Minnesota state officials, including the governor, the order of magnitude of this uprising is “urban warfare.”

    If you don’t care who’s funding this and organizing it, you’re delusional. This is an organized revolution to overthrow civilization and it’s succeeding. Frankly your lackadaisical
    about this situation is surprising to me. I used to rely on this website for serious commentary, but that was before you fell for the Coronavirus hoax. Now this.

    • John Wilkinson
      Posted June 4, 2020 at 6:21 am | Permalink

      One thing about Counter-Currents that I find sets it above many other dissident-right content producers is that Dr Johnson allows for (within reason) a fairly broad spectrum of thought and opinion. Obviously he doesn’t print pro-Antifa content, for instance. He minimizes fringe conspiracy theory stuff. Most content has an intellectual hue backed up by evidence, context, historical precedence, etc rather than the latest Duganistic “hot takes” from edgelords.

      Don’t overthink the presence of an article that you might disagree with. I don’t think the character of CC has changed one iota since I started reading this site 5-6 years ago.

  2. Adrian
    Posted June 4, 2020 at 5:46 am | Permalink

    The evidence for coronavirus being a hoax is surely not so conclusive that you can’t allow for a difference of opinion?

  3. Posted June 4, 2020 at 8:14 am | Permalink

    Bakeswell, you don’t understand. We just need sensible brick control laws and the rioters will return to peaceful protesting.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace