2,155 words
Full text of Enoch Powell’s Rivers of Blood Speech here. One can hear it read here.
The single most talked-about Member of the British Parliament today was a lowly backbencher who was kicked out of the shadow government of his party. The cause of this strange situation is the farsightedness of the man combined with his extraordinary eloquence. The backbencher’s name: Enoch Powell. The reason for his fame is a single speech delivered on April 20, 1968, to an audience in Birmingham. It has come to be known as The Rivers of Blood Speech.
Powell argued that immigration from the Commonwealth — especially the non-white parts — was producing a race problem in England that mirrored the intractable race problem in the United States.
Powell was correct, of course. England now has Negro street crime, race riots (a particularly nasty series occurred in 2011 [1]), Islamic terrorism, ISIS fighters, knife attacks, concert bombings, car-rammings, and Rotherham grooming gangs. There are also associated problems, like the loss of Anglo-Saxon liberties like free speech to accommodate the newcomers as well as schoolmarmish race-committees that keep down whites.
How did Powell predict this situation? What made Powell such a formidable force was that people know more about him than Prime Minister Edward Heath, the man who drove Powell from the Conservative Party. Powell was not an aristocrat. His family was something like the “upper-working-class,” and they came from a deindustrializing area. This article will seek to find out what elements Powell had that made him so right, so courageous, and so memorable.
Hard Work
You Can buy F. Roger Devlin’s Sexual Utopia in Power here
Powell didn’t come from a large family. He was an only child. Powell’s upbringing as an only child was fortuitous in that the resources of several generations were devoted to him. When Powell himself became a family man, he had more than one child. His father was the headmaster of a school in Birmingham. His mother devoted herself to teaching her son as much as he could learn. And the young Powell learned it. He studied hard as a boy.
By the time he reached his twenties, Powell knew German, Latin, and Greek, and became well versed in the classics; enough so that he would be invited to be a professor on the subject in Australia as a very young man. Powell later went on to learn Urdu.
Powell knew so much about ancient Greece that when he traveled to Australia in the 1930s he gave lectures to his passengers during their Athens stopover. He wasn’t a know-it-all. He carried enough of a gravitas that his fellow travelers enjoyed his talks.
When World War II came, he returned to England and enlisted as a private. The tragedy of that conflict and the missteps in British policy that caused the disaster is beyond the scope of this article, but Powell’s military career is illustrative of good leadership, as well as a military that is ethnically aligned to its nation-state.
Because the British military was then free of the promotion time-in-grade straightjacket that is applied in America’s armed forces to keep down racial jealousy, Powell was quickly promoted. He remarked later that the jump from Private to Lance Corporal was the biggest jump in leadership he experienced. As a Lance Corporal, Powell had command authority, and his first unpleasant duty was to bring a soldier up on charges for drunkenly urinating in an inappropriate place. Shortly thereafter he became an officer.
He was assigned to Military Intelligence and sent to North Africa. Each day he rose before dawn to read German radio messages and sort through reconnaissance photographs. After the British and Americans won in North Africa, Powell was posted to India. He finished his career as a Brigadier. It is a remarkable accomplishment to rise from Private to Staff Sergeant in such a short time. To rise to the rank of Brigadier from Private that quickly is so unusual that Powell might be the only man who’s ever done it. It was Powell’s hard work that got him there. Not just his hard work as a soldier, but his academic drive that made him well-read, educated, and fluent in several languages before enlisting. In other words, Powell had what it took to be a Brigadier before he enlisted as a Private.
Mastering the Basics
You can buy Greg Johnson’s The White Nationalist Manifesto here
After the war, Powell returned to England and went into politics. He joined the Conservative Party and won his political spurs by running in a Labour Party stronghold in 1947. These forlorn endeavors are common for up-and-coming British politicians and they help the candidate learn how to get elected with few risks for the party in general. In 1950 he was elected in his own right. He represented Wolverhampton, a town near Birmingham. Much of Powell’s early focus was kitchen table issues. Powell’s economic policy was like that of Ronald Reagan and Margret Thatcher in the 1980s before these ideas became fashionable. In 1950, Powell was out-of-step with the rest of British opinion, so he really had to have a solid understanding of his economic ideas. A single bad debate could have sunk him.
One can watch Powell give speeches and debate others on the internet. What one immediately notices is Powell’s eloquence, as well as his excellent wardrobe. It is impossible to imagine the man in a tracksuit and camouflaged baseball hat with the words “Duck Hunting” embroidered on the crown. In my own life and career, I’ve found that dressing well pays considerable dividends in everyday interactions. I encourage the reader to see the difference when dealing with customer service when wearing a jacket and tie rather than jeans and a t-shirt.
Interpreting the Data Right; in Time and Place
Powell’s Rivers of Blood Speech is a masterwork of properly interpreting data at the right time and the right place. Indeed, Powell had been properly interpreting data for many years. He was probably the first politician to provide a vision for the British to make their way in the world following the collapse of the British Empire. In a 1961 speech to The Royal Society of Saint George, he said:
That power and that glory [of the British Empire] have vanished, as surely, if not as tracelessly, as the imperial fleet from the waters of Spithead. And yet England is not as Nineveh and Tyre, nor as Rome, nor as Spain. Herodotus relates how the Athenians, returning to their city after it had been sacked and burnt by Xerxes and the Persian army, were astonished to find, alive and flourishing in the blackened ruins, the sacred olive tree, the native symbol of their country. So we today, at the heart of a vanished empire, amid the fragments of demolished glory, seem to find, like one of her own oak trees, standing and growing, the sap still rising from her ancient roots to meet the spring, England herself. [2]
Powell demonstrates a critical truth: Imperial ventures in far-off lands aren’t the end sum of national greatness. At the height of their power, British soldiers patrolled the Hindu Kush. As this article goes to print, British soldiers patrol the Hindu Kush again, and yet this fact makes nobody happier than before. By the same token, do Americans feel happy that the US Infantry is also in the Hindu Kush and patrolling the DMZ in Korea?
What is also so outstanding about the above passage is that it can inspire one to do anything, even in the demoralizing context of the recently-vanished British Empire. Personally, I can see something of a bold call to return to the industrialized past of England’s Black Country, where science, industry, and innovation came together.
A call for post-Imperial greatness: The flag of The Black Country, the region developed by Powell’s ancestors and represented by Powell in Parliament. This flag is notable in that it shows the nobility of industrialization and hard work. An Industrialized society gives rise to many other innovations. Additionally, industry allows ordinary men to economically prosper and better support their family and community.
Powell also recognized the demographic changes occurring in England and rightly interpreted how these changes would play out. Indeed, the changes were happening in Powell’s own home district:
Caribbean blacks in Powell’s West Midlands home.
One could probably match up grooming gang locations with this figure — Pakistani locations.
Displaced! British Whites in the West Midlands.
In his Rivers of Blood Speech, Powell tells of a constituent’s problems caused by changing demographics:
She is becoming afraid to go out. Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letterbox. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. “Racialist”, they chant.
Powell’s description of the policy is an understatement of the serious scale of the problems Third World people create. Today, there aren’t just broken windows, but gang rapes and bombings done to the chant of “Racialist.”
Powell & His Data, Misunderstood
You can buy Greg Johnson’s Toward a New Nationalism here
Powell’s remarks were greeted politely by the small audience that heard it, but the public went ballistic when the speech was transmitted across Britain. Most of the public liked his speech, especially the working class. Those that hated the speech really hated it.
Had the speech been given in a critical moment, when Powell had a chance to become Party Leader or Prime Minister, he would have won those offices. However, it didn’t matter. The political elite in Britain chose to not take a stand on the immigration issue. Powell eventually left the Conservative Party for a Unionist one in Northern Ireland and continued to serve in Parliament. In his new role, Powell’s influence was reduced and he had no chance to become Prime Minister.
I can only speculate as to why the British Political elite went against Powell, however, my guess is an educated one. First, the British and Americans have a common political culture. When the Americans went for “civil rights,” the British naturally followed. Second, among whites, the key implementers of “civil rights” were valorous men who’d been the field-grade officers of World War II. Prime Minister Heath was a Major in the Royal Artillery during the conflict. Additionally, “civil rights” is semi-religious — like UFO sightings and crop circle stuff — where its believers double down on their beliefs in the face of evidence to the contrary. However, Powell didn’t cause racial trouble with his speech, he merely pointed to ongoing racial trouble and wished to not see it further imported into the United Kingdom. The Rivers of Blood Speech was made after it was conclusively shown that the 1964 Civil Rights Act in the United States made racial problems worse. Indeed, Powell’s speech was given as American cities were still smoldering due to the King assassination riots.
Powell, Triumphant?
There are interviews of non-whites one can see on English documentaries about Powell’s Rivers of Blood Speech. These non-whites often say they started to feel unwelcome after the speech. Strangely, none of these people ever flee English “racists” for Jamaica or Pakistan, but there is certainly truth to what they are saying. Concepts expressed by establishment figures, even backbenchers like Powell, tend to grip the public’s mind while nobodies merely shout great truths into the wind.
A case in point — Pakistani grooming gangs were well known to the people of Northern England, but resistance to it never materialized until a reporter for London’s prestigious paper The Times named Andrew Norfolk started to write articles about the situation. In a talk in 2015, Mr. Norfolk said,
On my own, I could have done exactly the same work as I’ve done [in his reports spanning five years] and it would have achieved precisely nothing. I could have posted blogs, I could have stood and shouted on street corners. It wouldn’t have changed anything. But this wasn’t me alone. This was The Times. . . because it was The Times that kept running those stories, people listened. [3]
In light of the grooming gangs, the British establishment is slowly starting to come around to Powell’s way of thinking, although as yet they are only focused on the worst sort of non-white offenders. The British have also left the European Union — a move Powell would have supported. It remains to be seen if the British start to remove the rest of their troublesome non-white population. Should they do so, we in America can feel a sense of hope since we share a common political culture.
In sum, Powell was a prophet of the highest order. He didn’t preach on behalf of a new religion or do cheap parlor tricks with a crystal ball. Instead, he spoke the truth — a very uncomfortable truth — as he saw it, regardless of the consequences. We would all do well to listen to his words and emulate his personal virtues.
Notes
[1] Sam Francis wrote about another nasty race riot in 2001 here: https://vdare.com/articles/british-race-riots-were-predictable-and-predicted
[2] From a transcript of Powell’s speech to the Society, as maintained by the Churchill Foundation. https://archive.li/gWolW
[3] From Norfolk’s talk on his investigation to Shift North 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrUiHB5qJJ0&spfreload=10
12 Comments
Proud to be from Enoch Powell’s old seat. Sadly, preparing to leave – this is no longer any place for an Englishman.
One day I’ll return, and raise a statue to our former MP.
A man blessed with vision and brave enough to speak out !
FS
“A man blessed with vision and brave enough to speak out !”
Absolutely correct. The one man in the whole of the weak, cowardly Establishment to speak out. Powell spoke for millions when he opposed Third-world Immigration into Britain: “We must be mad, literally mad to be permitting this Immigration. The country is pilling up its funeral pyre.” Powell’s prophecy in fifty years ago .
For his pains Enoch Powell, member of the British Parliament, was thrown into the political wilderness. But he was loved by the British people and he spoke for them. In reaction came the rise of the National Front as the voice and champion of the British people. The advent of Powell was a water-shed in British political and social life; the country has never been the same since: the to be or not to be of Great Britain.
Enoch Powell, Rest in Peace. May your spirit continue to inspire us.
Dear Richard,
Today’s occupants of Parliament are mere pygmies by comparison!
best
FS
Twenty years after his “Rivers of Blood” warning, Powell returned to the theme in 1988; “The Third-worlders in Britain are causing us such social and other problems that Great Britain would be fully entitled to repatriate them back to their own countries.”
This is the spirit that inspires and motivates present-day Nationalists.
Dear Richard,
Yes indeed, we need someone of the the same gravitas and foresight!
Best
FS
Interesting, but misses out a couple of issues. “After the British and Americans won in North Africa, Powell was posted to India.” It would be interesting to see whether Powell’s race realist attitudes stem from his time in India. I suspect that they do. When one sees close up that there really ARE differences in human behavior around the world, one is less likely to view changing demographics with indifference. The second issue that this article misses out is probably the most important one. Powell was attacked in most of the media. Who owns the media in Britain? The article doesn’t say.
Powell was not a ‘race man’. He believed, I think, that Jamaicans and Pakistanis could become Englishmen until the end of his days. These WWII veterans — not the 68ers — were the generation that cemented the demographic invasion that Powell began to realize was a serious mistake, but not as a matter of principle but mostly because it was poorly managed. The biggest demerit on Powell’s record was his ‘free market’ ideas which ultimately undermined English sovereignty, buttressing arguments for the Customs Union which set the stage for Britain’s subsumption into the EU.
To rise to the rank of Brigadier from Private that quickly is so unusual that Powell might be the only man who’s ever done it.
That may be true in the British army. Nathan Bedford Forrest rose from private to lieutenant general in the Confederate army.
At the time of his death Powell was still acknowledged in the notices as a seminal, if divisive, figure in British public life.
Nowadays he is anathematised by that same press and media as nothing more than a racist ignoramus; his scholarship discounted, his distinguished war service ignored.
Even to rehearse his words on Twitter, let alone in public, is to bring oneself to the attention of the British police (who are uncharacteristicly zealous to chase up even the least ‘non-crime hate incident’).
This is a sign that what Powell foretold is coming to pass: the pyre has been well-heaped up and the kindling torches are lit …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Es2pPwbCR34
Unfortunately, this article gets a few basics wrong about the importance of Powell and the Rivers of Blood speech.
At the time of the speech, Powell was not a lowly back-bencher, he was the shadow Minister of Defence, had held important ministerial posts in previous Conservative administrations and was generally seen as an intellectual giant within the Conservative Party.
That is why his speech had such impact because it was the voice of a respected politician and came from the heart of the establishment.
The other factor was that, as on respondent has already pointed out, Powell was not a race man. In fact, he was most famous for his spontaneous speech on abuses at the Hola Camp during the Mau Mau rebellion. The speech is still regarded as one of the high points in the very long history of parliamentary oratory.
Britain is a far more closed politically that the US and a Trump would never happen. Change has to come from within the establishment. That’s why Powell caused such alarm; it is also why he never made PM in spite of being the nation’s most popular candidate. His level of popular support was probably without precedent. Opposition to mass immigration was, outside the universities, almost universal. Yet in spite of this the National Front never rose above street politics and attracted no intellectual support. Quite simply, it was not a part of the establishment; could never outgrow its origins and never prove a vehicle for change.
Powell’s intellectual background was also far more impressive than it appears here. He was from the age of three recognised as a prodigy and went on to take every Classics prize at Cambridge. An unprecedented achievement and also achieved at a time when the best and the brightest still did Classics (GRATES in Oxbridge parlance).
His professorship at the University of Sydney was also without precedent. He was not merely appointed a professor in the American sense. As professor he was Head of Department at 26, a position that was usually not achieved until one’s 50s. As he self approvingly remarked, he beat Nietzsche by a year.
He never lost his commitment to scholarship. After his retirement from politics, and decades after he had left academe, in 1994, Yale published his new translation and commentary of the First Gospel. He’d been working on it in his spare time. Like Oliver, Powell was a type of classical scholar we will never look upon again
There are several excellent biographies of Powell and collections of his speeches are available in various editions. He was also a competent poet and a collection was re-printed in the 90s. His youthful translation of Herodotus is hard to come by but also worth the trouble finding.
They make inspiring reading but nothing was as inspiring as the man himself. There was an amazing, almost universal sense of hope: here was God’s Englishman and he could save our nation because he was a part of its soul. Tragically it was not to be but I will never forget those times or the man.