Counter-Currents
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 251
Uppity White Folks & How to Reach Them
Greg Johnson
76 words / 45:14
To listen in a player, click here. To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save link as” or “save target as.”
This is the audio of Greg Johnson’s talk in Gothenburg, Sweden, on Sunday, September 22, on the occasion of the publication of the Swedish translation of The White Nationalist Manifesto. We wish to thank the publisher, the organizers of the event, and everyone who attended. We apologize for the technical problems with the recording.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
24 comments
The pensioners at General Electric are just the latest casualties in the slowly unfolding pension crisis, a crisis that will affect identity politics in ways we can’t imagine ( not that anybody at Counter-Currents has a Defined Pension Benefit).
“No army can stop an idea whose time has come.”
“If you would propose this idea, this radical idea, that we want political policies in place that would make sure that next year there will be more Swedes in Sweden, and the year after that still more – is there really any good argument against that proposal?”
Not exactly “good” arguments but:
According to our antiracist state religion all people are of equal value, so the preference for more Swedes rather than Somalis and Syrians would be considered very racist.
Most of our politicians would also argue that it is our duty to accept refugees since we signed some UN declarations and conventions in the aftermath of World War II. We have no similar formal obligation to ensure that ethnic Swedes remain the majority in our country.
Another common argument is that Sweden is needed as a safe place for people who need refuge and that “established Swedes” must integrate with these “new Swedes”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3-_KZExlJ0
Since everybody can become a Swede according to this view, our race or ethnic origin doesn’t matter. If only we “established Swedes” could be more welcoming and willing to integrate with the “new Swedes,” everything would be fine.
You are a regugee in the first safe country. A migrant one country beyond that. The UN would oblidge Sweden to take refugees from Norway, Denmark, and Finland. Maybe from the Baltic states or Russia. There is no obligation to take Somalians and other Third Worlders.
Indeed Greg, indeed! Here in Canada it was a strange sight watching our national police force welcoming illegal refuges from the United States: https://globalnews.ca/news/3258012/mounties-refugees-quebec/
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/asylum-seeker-911-call-1.5157477
You are a regugee in the first safe country. A migrant one country beyond that. The UN would oblidge Sweden to take refugees from Norway, Denmark, and Finland. Maybe from the Baltic states or Russia. There is no obligation to take Somalians and other Third Worlders.
That sounds logical, but unfortunately I can’t find anything about “the first safe country” in the UN conventions. The UN has, on the contrary, criticized Trump for his attempts to direct Latin Americans to their first safe country instead of seeking asylum in the US:
“Under the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, there is no obligation on refugees to claim asylum in the first safe country they reach. Asylum seekers are protected against prosecution for illegal entry to a foreign country by Article 31 of the Convention.
In a statement, the UN Refugee Agency said the US measures would “endanger vulnerable people in need of international protection from violence or persecution.””
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-49002819
We will not be free until we recognize that we are a people. A Great People. Without us the world will enter a permanent Dark Age.
Great speech here. You are doing great work.
Great speech as usual. However regarding your argument about wanting more swedes, the left would just counter it by saying that it’s bad for the climate to increase the population, that we do not need more of anything, rather less and that it’s therefore good with a decrease of the population.
Leftists don’t envision fewer hominids in Sweden, just fewer Swedes. All environmental concerns go out the window when the topic of non-white immigration is concerned. The Left will never say there are too many nonwhites in Sweden.
The
Also, my formulation is quite specific: increasing the Swedish percentage of Sweden need not increase the absolute population if you decrease the numbers of other groups.
You also have to laugh at these fools who simultaneously say that white people need fewer babies and white countries have too few children and thus need migrants. I think antropogenic climate change is just a leftist hoax, but there are real environmental problems which are due to explosive population growth, largely in Africa.
Is there a transcript of this speech available?
There are many quotes in this speech worth using.
Thanks
Hey Greg, I would like ask you this question:
Since there is overwhelming scientific consensus(actual climatologists) on anthropogenic climate change can we really afford not to act even it turns out as a leftist hoax?
Isnt it better to act now than be potentially fucked? Best case the worst is avoided the worst case it was a hoax.
I think these scientists are engaged in massive fraud.
I am a published scientist (hard science, not social science) and have been at the table when spurious AGW threats were added to reports without any scientific basis for doing so (beyond the pecuniary interests of the author who hoped for more project money from ZOG). When I confronted him, he silently stared at the floor until I left his office.
I have also worked on an international team of academics developing multivariate computer models of the natural world. Although the continental-scale system we attempted to model was magnitudes of order less complex than the earth’s climate, the experience left me with a great deal of skepticism re: the IPCC climate models. There are statistical tests you can run to determine model fitness, as well as the best mix of variables. Ok, but what if there’s no/deficient data for one or more of the variables? What if it’s not feasible, either technically or economically, to collect the data for those variables? Then “experts” invent a constant that “sounds about right”. Of our 10 or so variables, 4 were constants. That’s a whole lot of error. Was our model accurate? I have no idea.
As for the IPCC climate models, the 2010 leak of materials from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia, UK leaves zero doubt in my mind as to what happened. The read me file created by the poor sap who’s job it was at the college to recreate the prior work once UK FOIA requests were filed explains it all. They started with the UN’s preferred “hot” result and worked backwards, using heavy handed data cherry picking, to craft a model that would spit it out. Phil Jones, CRU’s director, had to be talked out of suicide after the leak. Pity for the Brits Al Cowlings wasn’t on hand with a Bronco, bag of cash, disguise, and Bronco for a trip down the M6.
They want all but 500m of the goyim dead, with their 85 IQ muddy slave remnant living in panopticon Favela Logan’s Run.
A couple of years ago a Hungarian climate physicist named Ferenc Miskolczi was effectively fired from his top research job at NASA for claiming that climate change cannot be caused by rising levels of CO2. The Hungarian Academy of Sciences held an inquiry into his calculations and concluded that they were correct. But they still recommended the government to stay in the IPCC and comply with all the demands of the international climate agreements. WTF.
I’m wondering if you have been thinking about starting a channel on spreaker and uploading all of your podcasts there? Most of my favourite new right podcasts are on there and it’s such a great platform, but unfortunately it’s missing my favourite podcasts which are the counter current ones. If it’s a workload issue I would love to help you out with setting it up and uploading everything. Please let me know what you think!
Will look into it.
Pollution, resource depletion and extinction should be named by us at all corners. Let the shitlibs keep AGW.
Can you reference me to other New Right podcasts you think are worth listening to?
The Secrets in Our Google Searches. A small portion of the data is publicly available through Google Trends.
Greg,
You’re a badass Sir!
This speech is exactly what I need to wake the boomers in my family who are on the fence.
Love how the Swedish version leaves out “white.” Just own it.
In Europe, “being White” isn’t a thing that people are or identify with.
In America, we identify as “White” because we’re a conglomeration of various White ethnicities living on a separate continent.
People are Swedes, Poles, Germans, Greeks, French, etc, but they’re not “White”
Yeah, as if we have not heard this a thousand times from Paleocons and E. Michael Jones types.
https://counter-currents.com/2015/10/why-white-nationalism/
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment