Counter-Currents
Patrick Crusius
2,623 words
Saturday night, I went to bed, wondering if I would wake up the next morning to find my life’s work erased from the web because of the latest White Nationalist spree killer.
It happens now with accelerating regularity: a white man who is alarmed at white ethnic displacement goes to a place frequented by non-whites and starts shooting.
- On Saturday, April 27, a John Earnest, a 19-year-old white man walked into the Chabad synagogue in Poway, California, near San Diego and shot two people, killing one. Two others were injured by shrapnel.
- On Friday, March 15, 2019, a 28-year-old white man, Brenton Tarrant, reportedly entered the Al Noor Mosque and the Linwood Islamic Centre in Christchurch, New Zealand, killing 50 people and wounding around 40 others.
- On Saturday, October 27, 2018, a 46-year-old white man, Robert Bowers, was arrested for entering the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, killing eleven people and wounding six others, including four police officers.
- On Sunday, January 29, 2017, a 27-year-old white man, Alexandre Bissonnette, entered the Islamic Cultural Center in Quebec City, Canada, killed six Muslims gathered for prayer, and injured eight more.
- On Wednesday, June 17, 2015, a 21-year-old white man, Dylann Storm Roof, entered the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina, killed nine blacks gathered for Bible study, and injured three more.
- On Sunday, August 5, 2012, a 40-year-old white man, Wade Michael Page, a racist skinhead, opened fire at a Sikh temple near Milwaukee, killing six worshipers and wounding three others. He then shot and killed himself.
And now it has happened again:
- On Saturday, August 3, 2019, a 21-year-old white man, Patrick Crusius, walked into a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, and reportedly killed 20 people and injured 26 others.
Because these shootings all follow the same basic pattern, I have created a boilerplate article responding to them:
- “Understanding the Poway Synagogue Shooting“
- “Understanding the New Zealand Mosque Massacre“
- “Understanding the Pittsburgh Synagogue Massacre“
- “Understanding the Quebec Mosque Massacre“
- “Understanding the Charleston Church Massacre“
- “Understanding the Sikh Temple Massacre“
The basic argument is always the same. I just need to change a few of the particulars.
As a white person, I look down upon the criminals among us. I do not reflexively defend and glorify them. This was a terrible act: immoral, illegal, and politically damaging to white interests. I hope Crusius receives a fair trial and — if found guilty — a just punishment, but that seems unlikely given the racially charged atmosphere in America today.
We obviously don’t know all the facts yet, but based on the manifesto attributed to Crusius, he was worried about white demographic replacement. His manifesto begins as follows:
In general, I support the Christchurch shooter [Brenton Tarrant] and his manifesto. This attack is a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas. They are the instigators, not me. I am simply defending my country from cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an invasion. Some people will think this statement is hypocritical because of the nearly complete ethnic and cultural destruction brought to the Native Americans by our European ancestors, but this just reinforces my point. The natives didn’t take the invasion of Europeans seriously, and now what’s left is just a shadow of what was. My motives for this attack are not at all personal. Actually the Hispanic community was not my target before I read The Great Replacement [referring to Tarrant’s manifesto, not the book of the saem name by Renaud Camus].
Crusius states the aim of his attack is to encourage non-whites to self-deport and to discourage the business and political elites that benefit from non-white immigration.
Statistically, millions of migrants have returned to their home countries to reunite with the family they lost contact with when they moved to America. They come here as economic immigrants, not for asylum reasons. This is an encouraging sign that the Hispanic population is willing to return to their home countries if given the right incentive. An incentive that myself and many other patriotic Americans will provide. This will remove the threat of the Hispanic voting bloc which will make up for the loss of millions of baby boomers. This will also make the elites that run corporations realize that it’s not in their interest to continue piss off Americans. Corporate America doesn’t need to be destroyed, but just shown that they are on the wrong side of history. That if they don’t bend, they will break.
Crusius states that if white demographic displacement is not halted, there will be negative effects in both the short and long terms.
In the short term, we can expect the political dispossession of whites and a Democratic one-party state:
Due to the death of the baby boomers, the increasingly anti-immigrant rhetoric of the right and the ever increasing Hispanic population, America will soon become a one party-state. The Democrat party will own America and they know it. They have already begun the transition by pandering heavily to the Hispanic voting bloc in the 1st Democratic Debate. They intend to use open borders, free healthcare for illegals, citizenship and more to enact a political coup by importing and then legalizing millions of new voters. With policies like these, the Hispanic support for Democrats will likely become nearly unanimous in the future. The heavy Hispanic population in Texas will make us a Democrat stronghold. Losing Texas and a few other states with heavy Hispanic population to the Democrats is all it would take for them to win nearly every presidential election.
Also in the near future, we can expect mass non-white immigration to clash with increasing automation in the workforce:
Continued immigration will make one of the biggest issues of our time, automation, so much worse. Some sources say that in under two decades, half of American jobs will be lost to it. Of course some people will be retrained, but most will not. So it makes no sense to keep on letting millions of illegal or legal immigrants flood into the United States, and to keep the tens of millions that are already here. Invaders who also have close to the highest birthrate of all ethnicities in America. In the near future, America will have to initiate a basic universal income to prevent widespread poverty and civil unrest as people lose their jobs. Joblessness in itself is a source of civil unrest. The less dependents on a government welfare system, the better. The lower the unemployment rate, the better. Achieving ambitions [sic] social projects like universal healthcare and UBI would become far more likely to succeed if tens of millions of dependents are removed.
In the long term, Crusius expects that continued non-white immigration will destroy racial and cultural diversity:
I am against race mixing because it destroys genetic diversity and creates identity problems. Also because it’s completely unnecessary and selfish. 2nd and 3rd generation Hispanics form interracial unions at much higher rates than average. Yet another reason to send them back. Cultural and racial diversity is largely temporary. Cultural diversity diminishes as stronger and/or more appealing cultures overtake weaker and/or undesirable ones. Racial diversity will disappear as either race mixing or genocide will take place.
Even though Crusius wanted to kill non-whites to encourage immigrants to return home, he did not envision either killing or deporting all non-whites in America:
. . . the idea of deporting or murdering all non-white Americans is horrific. Many have been here at least as long as the whites, and have done as much to build our country. The best solution to this for now would be to divide America into a confederacy of territories with at least 1 territory for each race. This physical separation would nearly eliminate race mixing and improve social unity by granting each race self-determination within their respective territories.
I am sure many more facts will come to light in the coming months and at Crusius’ trial. But still, if this manifesto is indeed his work, I can say five things with confidence.
First, Patrick Crusius was definitely a White Nationalist by any reasonable definition of the term.
Second, this shooting spree could not have happened in a homogeneously white society. When different peoples are forced to live together in the same system, frictions are inevitable. These frictions give rise to misunderstandings, distrust, alienation, and long-simmering resentments, which flare up into hatred, violence, and social upheaval. Crusius’s actions are predictable consequences of multiculturalism. Sadly, we will only see more such violence until white nations regain their sanity and reverse multiculturalism.
Thus the New Right stands for the principle of racial divorce. It is time for whites and non-whites to go our separate ways and pursue our own destinies. We stand for the creation of separate racially homogeneous societies, through the peaceful and humane process of redrawing borders and shifting populations.
In the case of recent immigrant populations, the best solution is for them to return to their homelands. I also think that is the best solution for groups like Jews, Japanese, and Chinese who have been in America for a long time but still maintain strong ties to their homelands. In the case of American Indians and the descendants of black slaves, territorial partition or semi-autonomous reservations would seem to be in order.
Third, I blame Crusius’s shooting spree on President Donald Trump. Trump was elected on the platform of building a wall on the Mexican border — which is right next to El Paso — and ending massive non-white immigration. Trump has had more than two-and-a-half years to keep his promises, and he has done virtually nothing. I am sure Patrick Crusius, like more than 60 million other White Americans, had high hopes for Trump. But those hopes have been dashed. If Trump had actually kept his campaign promises, Crusius probably would not have been driven to this desperate act.
Fourth, we should resist dismissing Crusius with the all-too-easy claim that he was “crazy.” Yes, Crusius did something evil and stupid. But Crusius’s underlying motive — fear of white race replacement — is not irrational or insane; it is a healthy reaction to objective facts. All white people have innate ethnocentric tendencies, wired deep in our brains. We love our own and we fear strangers. As diversity increases, all of us will bear increased psychic costs, even those who pursue wealth and status by selling out their own people in favor of foreigners.
Crusius and people like him may be nothing more than canaries in a coal mine: the first to sense the presence of a threat to the survival of us all. Crusius may have just been abnormally sensitive to the terrible psychic consequences of losing control of our society to aliens: stress, alienation, anger, hatred, rage, etc. Crusius’s manifesto, in particular, is dominated by a tone of depression and hopelessness:
My whole life I have been preparing for a future that currently doesn’t exist. The job of my dreams will likely be automated. Hispanics will take control of the local and state government of my beloved Texas, changing policy to better suit their needs. They will turn Texas into an instrument of a political coup which will hasten the destruction of our country. The environment is getting worse by the year. If you take nothing else from this document, remember this: INACTION IS A CHOICE.
These are the words of a man who feels he has no future, a future stolen from him by race replacement immigration and the massive betrayal of Donald Trump, who promised to stop it. This heightened sensitivity might also go along with a whole suite of other abnormal traits. But we dismiss people like Crusius at our own risk. For in the end, all of us will feel the same effects — unless we heed the warning signs and turn back the rising tide of color.
Finally, Crusius’s “solution” to his rage and alienation — killing innocent people — just makes the racial situation worse rather than better. We will surely learn a lot more about Crusius’s ideas and affiliations in the coming months. But based on what we know now, we can say that his actions certainly resemble those of racially-motivated spree killers like Brenton Tarrant (whose example he explicitly cites), John Earnest, Robert Bowers, Dylann Roof, Anders Behring Breivik, Wade Michael Page, and Frazier Glenn Miller, all of whom are products of what I call “Old Right” thinking.
By the “Old Right,” I mean classical Fascism and National Socialism and their contemporary imitators who believe that White Nationalism can be advanced through such means as one party-politics, terrorism, totalitarianism, imperialism, and genocide.
Today’s Old Right scene is rife with fantasies of race war, lone-wolf attacks on non-whites, and heroic last stands that end in a hail of police bullets. Intelligent and honorable people have emerged from this milieu. But there have been more than a few spree-killers as well.
This kind of violence is worse than a crime. It is a mistake. It does nothing to advance our cause and much to set us back.
Given that reason, science, and history are all on our side, and the greatest apparatus of coercion and brainwashing in human history is on the enemy’s side, doesn’t it make sense to attack the enemy at his weakest point rather than at his strongest? This is why the North American New Right pursues White Nationalism through intellectual and cultural means: we critique the hegemony of anti-white ideas and seek to establish a counter-hegemony of pro-white ideas.
Only a fool picks a battle he cannot win, and we cannot win with violence. Fortunately, we don’t have to. The Left lost the Cold War but won the peace through the establishment of intellectual and cultural hegemony. We can beat them the same way.
Furthermore, the only form of violence that even has a chance to be productive in halting multiculturalism and non-white immigration would target the people responsible for these policies, not random innocents.
Moreover, killing innocent people has entirely predictable results. First, such violence creates sympathy for the victims. (Even I feel sympathy for them, and I would deport them all tomorrow if I had the power.) Second, it plays into the establishment narrative of evil, crazy, intolerant whites whose freedom of speech and weapons must be taken away.
As I argue in my essay “Against White Nationalist Terrorism,” White Nationalists are making tremendous progress by means of propaganda. We are converting people to our worldview. The more people we convert, the sooner we regain control of our homelands. This is why our enemies are hell-bent on censoring and deplatforming us. They use every shooting spree like Tarrant’s or Crusius’s as a pretext to further clamp down on our freedom of speech, which restricts our ability to change minds and delays the implementation of sane, nationalist policies. And every day we are delayed is paid for in white lives.
Patrick Crusius killed 20 Walmart shoppers, most of them non-white. But far more white people will die if his deeds lead to further erosions of freedom.
I wish I could erect a wall between myself and the kind of unstable, undisciplined people who go on killing sprees, but you can’t change the world from a bunker. Thus responsible white advocates need to adopt the next best course of action: (1) we must be alert to the signs of mental instability and inclinations toward violence and rigorously screen out such people, (2) we need to draw clear, unambiguous intellectual lines between New Right and Old Right approaches, and (3) if anyone makes concrete threats of committing such acts in our circles, we need to be the ones to call the police.
My goal is to persuade our people that White Nationalism is the solution to ethnic conflict not the cause of it. Spree killers and the people who celebrate them are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
25 comments
Your 2nd point is inaccurate inasmuch as he didn’t live in El Paso. It is also true that El Paso is a significantly low crime community. Allen, Texas is majority non-hispanic white.
One could live in an all-white suburb and still be sensitive to the dark psychic force of racial dispossession. You’re taking the point too narrowly.
I went to a swedish free area of Stockholm once, and there was actually a swedish man there selling mobile phones. He was working for some kind of arabs. It was a mentally broken man and a deeply depressing foresight of our peoples future. Nothing but crushed pride in his eyes and a lot of arab smug smiles. It will really take something special for a change to emerge from bullied minority whites left behind in immigrant areas. Their fate brakes my heart.
If a mass movement is to save the west, I belive it to emerge from within heavely white areas where racial conciousness rises. Places where pride can be restored or has not yet been destroyed. Places like big parts of Germany, the american mid west and eastern Europe.
In Trump, such a movement was on the way. Who knows what Trump might do after his reelection. Alles ist möglich!
That’s right. This is a shock to German elites and political parties, considering that AfD appeared on the political scene in year 2017.
In some federal states:
“The AfD is currently polling at 23%, ahead of Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union, or CDU, which is at 22%, according to a poll carried out by Bild. The far-left Die Linke is in third place at 14% while the Greens are at 13% and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) on 11%.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08-04/stunning-upset-germanys-far-right-afd-set-defeat-merkels-cdu-countrys-east
There is a lot of hope for Afd. Unlike most other big nationalist parties in west Europe, Afd has not been willing to purge the more radical elements within the party.
Germany has some aspects with it, wich makes it interesting. Beside being the biggest and most important country in Europe, and probably the most admired within the continent, they also automatically have a perspective of their own considering WW2. That changes their narrative of world politics a bit, campared to anglo saxons and others. And a german nationalist is also far more likely to be jew wise then an english or french, for historic reasons. I know that for exemple swedish nationalists are often not awere of jewish power. The german public is also, thanks to the language barrier, not very exposed to the jewish, anti-white, pro-israeli, warmongering, silly, ironic and showbiz-like news media from USA. Instead, germans are indoctrinated more by a ”Never again” peace-message through their shool system. Oufcourse, they have this schuldkuktur, wich also comes from the shools, but it is disappearing by the day and only strongly effects the elit maybe 1/4 of germans nowadays. I have met plenty of non political germans with the opinion that it was not at all so bad as it is now told during the 30s. Wich is also completely true. Western countries of today are not to be compared with Germany of say 1937, as it would be an embarrassing result for modern societys. Many germans know this, and Hitler anno 2019 is not the monster in Germany as he is in for example USA. The peace indoctrination in the german schools also have a better influence on society then owerblown patriotism. The left in Europe is far more anti war then the democratic party in USA, and also critical of Israel. Its therefor good that Afd keeps their radikal elements, wich is more left leaning. So there is basically hope for Afd. Much more then in UKIP or the dutch freedom party, and also more then in the scandinavian nationalist parties, which has been taken over by jewish war on islam.
Anything can happen actually
El Paso is basically an upscale suburb of Juarez.
Reasonable essay Greg. We need to let more of the shooter’s personal circumstances be revealed. Is the 8ch manifesto confirmed to be written by him? Was he enticed, encouraged by agents provocateur? Was he on meds or did he have a history of suffering trauma or extreme alienation?
If he really believes what he wrote, how did he imagine that shooting random people in a mall would help his cause, even by some complicated chain of events? The responses to every other attacker of his ilk was just more repression & less sympathy (or increasing concealment of sympathy) for these ideas.
This is the second in the sequence of three high-profile shooting sprees to occur within a matter of a week. The first was the Garlic Festival shooting which happened to occur 666 days after the Las Vegas Harvest Festival shooting (https://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2019/07/19-210-gilroy-garlic-festival-shooter.html?m=1).
The El Paso shooter praises Brenton Tarrant in his Manifesto. Unlike Tarrant there is a dearth of footage, despite occurring within a WalMart. In America it is common knowledge how much surveillance cameras there are within – and surrounding these particular stores. When will this footage be made publicly viewable to corroborate every detail of the ensuing narrative? Considering that the push to repeal the 2nd Amendment has been coming down the pike for years, this will be one of the events that the justification push will use.
But, even more troubling is the fact that whites are being declared as domestic terrorists by Jewish media figures within our own country. Check out the Laura Moser tweet, it is her literally stating:
“It’s not just every day anymore. It’s every hour. Another white terrorist laying waste to the innocent with the help of the craven GOP who will still refuse to pass any laws to protect us.”
https://mobile.twitter.com/lcmoser/status/1157897846819086337?ref_src=twsrc%255Etfw%257Ctwcamp%255Etweetembed%257Ctwterm%255E1157897846819086337&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fdailystormer.name%252Fanother-mass-shooting-in-dayton-ohio-multiple-dead-allegedly-a-white-shooter%252F
This is why the FBI is calling “conspiracy theorists” dangerous. While most people are indulging in moral outrage over these alleged events. There is the rational group asking “what exactly happened?” How many shots were fired?
What brand of rifle was used?
What brand of magazines were used?
What brand of ammunition was used?
From first shots to eventual neutralization by police how long was the event?
Were the wounds of the victims consistent with .223 round claimed to have been used by the perp?
Considering the inconsistencies with the narrative of the Vegas shooting and the police bodycam footage. Will any footage of this recent shooting be publicly released?
Mainstream media is quarterbacking this shit. They have studios, editing suites, post production facilities. What lengths would they go to to achieve civilization manipulation?
On the meta level:
War in Venezuela
War in Iran
Antagonizing Russia
Riots in Hong Kong to antagonize China
Weapons shipments to Taiwan
Advancing the race war in America
Remember, amateurs study tactics, but experts study logistics.
The machine is heating up for the persecution of dissenting Whites, if journalists are to be counted as its voice. The system profits enormously from these attacks, and it is rather probable that its agents are stoking them, or even engineering them.
It seems that the witty dialecticians of Progress do not understand that the only reason people ever put up with the indignity of democracy is because of the promise of personal freedoms, and that once these are gone, nobody will ever have any reason to be content with every adult in the country having a vote over his own fate. Perhaps the greatest testimony to their delusion is their lack of understanding that Trump whom they so much revile is the only thing which *can* prevent the breakdown of law and order. Fancy a Democratic candidate Beta O’Rourke presiding over a racially divided America where alienated groups started to murder each other in cold blood, sparing neither women nor children!
Indeed. My Twitter account was suspended today. The offense? I simply responded to an anti-white tweet with facts about mass shooters being mostly black.
“it is rather probable that its agents are stoking them, or even engineering them.”
My thoughts exactly: “That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.”
“Third, I blame Crusius’s shooting spree on President Donald Trump.”
Thank you. That needed to be said for the reasons you articulated.
Who else thinks the shooter was a Jew?
There have been some reports alleging his mother is ‘Hispanic’. The truth will be hard to discern.
He looks a lot like people from south Louisiana in his other pictures actually. The surname, presumably German, appears to have been first centered in Louisiana.
I noticed that too, he’s got that “nerdy” jew look. He reminds me of that jew who used to be a spokesman for “Subway,” (he lost like 300 lbs. just by eating subway sandwiches), the one that got sent to prison for child pornography.
Violence is inevitable
I think you make yourself irrelevant by harping on something beyond your control. Especially when it is over chaotic “Lone Tards” who wouldn’t know ‘metapolitics’ if it introduced itself, had a business card, wore a tux and offered on tap a keg of Milwaukees Best and do free barbeque with all the fixin’s.
Of course I am of an older generation of Resistance activist and back in the late 80s and early 90s White Supremacy was nothing if not violent.
I don’t think you gain anything by renouncing violence as it is like always having a holdout gun for an emergency. Something you always want to have.
Did you know I got lynched in Lake County Ohio by Bryan Reo?
$105,000 against me and $400 against my Church. So much for Freedumb of Speech & Religion. I drove 900 miles and got lynched by a jury with an African female and 4 female & 3 cuck whigger tards all whipped up to an anti-racist frenzy by Bryan Reo — who denounced White Supremacy and disavowed all its past history since 2003 and Judge Condom.
http://www.whitenationalist.org/forum/showthread.php?1614
Not a chance for peace, not during inevitable collapse and civil war.
I’ll post further rebuttal to your article later, as usual.
Hail Victory !!!
Pastor Martin Lindstedt
Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri
Paul Joseph Watson posted a survey on his Summit News site today stating that approximately 80% of Gen Z-ers in the UK have a sense of no hope for their futures.
After reading the parts of the shooter’s alleged words here, and realizing they are almost identical to many things I have thought and written, I ask myself why he would do what he did and I never would?
Perhaps the answer lies in the hopelessness he expressed.
The pure narcissism that his dad expresses in his autobiography is very similar to Patrick’s unhinged act.
So if Patrick Crusius, and his ilk are supposed to be like “canaries in a coal mine,” what does that make guys, and gals (including you Mr. Johnson) who have been around for decades in other white identity manifestations? What metaphor describes our activities?
Somehow it makes no sense. The guy makes astute observations, formulates coherent sentences and paragraphs and then shoots up lots of random people who look Hispanic to him. It is clear as hell that such deeds are counterproductive in the extreme. Not only that, if he is not executed, then he will land in a jail where any number of Hispanic gang members will be waiting for him. Somehow he did not have _this_ little foresight although he has a lot of foresight with regard to immigration.
What sense can be made of that? The Christchurch event was similar and must look very suspicious to anyone who watches the video. You cannot put on socks after having been hit by several bullets, that’s also clear as hell.
Someone mentioning that loads of video footage must exist, but we get to see only one short sequence. Other news that some witness spoke about several shooters only to retract her statement. Still a lot of unanswered questions about the Las Vegas shooting targeting mainly white concert goers.
Patrick was in a fame competition with his dad. I don’t think Crusius had an authentically racist motive. It was all about notoriety. The profilers in the FBI will dig deep into his family dynamic and find that his family were soaked in liberal therapeutic table talk and figure out that the dad was a fame seeking charlatan and that the son was too. The motive was Harris Klebold high scoring Murderball.
I noticed that all these shooters are surviving too; don’t they realize what their life in prison will be like? It is suspicious to say the least? They better hope that there is a branch of the “Aryan Brotherhood” in their prisons, and that they get accepted into the ranks, a little guy like Patrick Crusius is going to need it. Otherwise a pair of tits on his shoulder blades, and a bush on his tailbone are going to be tattooed on his back (just like Richard Speck), and he is going to be passed around for a cigarette. He better toughen up, big time.
There is no point in bemoaning the inevitable
You write these articles every time the increasingly inevitable happens — some Lone Tard reads White Nationalist talking points from our Internet-based organizations to our choir. The body count piles up and we say that the “Lone Tard” was singing off tune when he takes our talking points into his “manifesto” and he makes us look bad, as if we had a mass audience who would follow us where ever we led except for the latest outrage.
That is not the point. Over 95 % of ZOGlings understand that they are living in the only possible world in which they could survive as they are. Thus absent Collapse in which over 80% of them die of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse they are never going to go with us. Our Movement is one in which we are a militant minority, at war with the ZOGling herd animal Majority, and one in which we can never gain power unless we seize it upon conditions which are dire and alien to those we would rule over after exterminating our enemies — and I’ll leave unsaid those enemies as both sides know who they are.
This is not a case of saying, “The Revolution starts when the jack-booted thugs kick in MY door,” as was common within the Militia Movement of the early and mid 90s before the Internet became common. At this time if we wish to personally survive we must cultivate an air of being dangerous enough to not risk open conflict by having us rounded up by ZOG. Thus a policy of renouncing violence, be it defensive or limited-purpose & -extent offensive violence is unsafe for any wannabe [bowel] Movement “leader” not a ZOGbot. Rather when ZOG would deal with us the possibility of violence which might get out of hand needs to be always present as a margin of safety for ourselves. With me violence is ALWAYS an option. Sometimes I wish I had killed and been killed on 9 April 2004 when the local social workers came to take and buy and sell my grandchildren so that I never saw any of them again. My only excuse for still breathing is my plans in destroying tens of millions of ZOGlings by helping bring about Collapse.
If ZOG had to go back to 1890s horse & mule agriculture then at a maximum ZOG could only feed 120 million even if most of us were Amish — and maybe not even then. Industrial agribusiness requires massive inputs of fossil fuel — which is running out. So anything we do, even if peaceful in intent, will create ripples which will disrupt rotten ZOG. There will be no one for either ZOG to negotiate with within our fractured [bowel] Movement or able or willing to negotiate with ZOG even if ZOG wished to negotiate with any of us. A ethnostate will be part of the Ten Thousand Warlordcies.
So I recognize you as one of the Movement warlords and do not think you are a ZOGbot like Dickie Spencthwer or any else of the Alt-Rite.
What scares a beaner at a Walmart is not the Border Patrol or INS. What scares a beaner is some sort of latter-day John Wesley Hardin who will shoot beaners of all ages, sexes, and conditions and make jobs for American coyotes and buzzards. This Lone Tard at the El Paso Walmart certainly was no John Wesley Hardin — he looked like a jew-beaner to me. But what is important is getting rid of these aliens by any means necessary, not doing it is an “acceptable” manner to anyone else.
Therefore I see no point in bemoaning the inevitable. Young desperate men able to get semi-automatic firearms will come out shooting. Best not to be around inside a mass of targets. If we are going to endlessly cumplain about “great replacement” and “white genocide” then that message will reach unstabile ears which in reality none of us control. There will be a downpour of reaction from the usual suspects. By all means try to control the flashback as you want. But for all of our running and all of our cunning the end destination is the Collapse and End of this Mighty Evil Empire and its replacement by only 10-20 % of the remaining population which will be ruled by thousands of local military dictatorships or warlords each running their own neo-feudalism.
Hail Victory !!!
Pastor Martin Lindstedt
Church of Jesus Christ Christian / Aryan Nations of Missouri
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.