1,037 words
In his seminal work, Suicide of the West, James Burnham wrote:
Liberalism is the ideology of western suicide. When once this initial and final sentence is understood, everything about liberalism – the beliefs, emotions and values associated with it, the nature of its enchantment, its practical record, its future – falls into place.
His point is understood and often reiterated by the Right, especially by Pat Buchanan, but the aphorism is worth considering on a personal, as well as civilizational, level. If liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide, it stands to reason that Western liberals might be inclined towards suicide on an individual basis.
When food and culture critic Anthony Bourdain killed himself, Left Twitter made special note of his politics in their mourning for him. Here’s anti-white Left-anarchist Malcolm Harris approving of Bourdain’s self-flagellation over his role in “meathead culture:”
Bourdain was one of the only entertainment guys I saw talking about holding himself to a standard above “not guilty” https://t.co/UHJNMSvNIQ
— Malcolm Harris (@BigMeanInternet) June 8, 2018
On his most recent series, Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown, Bourdain had gone out of his way to chastise Western intervention in Africa, and in South Africa, he paid special attention to urban blacks, as opposed to urban Anglos or rural Boers. The same series also featured President Barack Obama in an episode set in Vietnam. Bourdain was a fan of both Obama and Southeast Asia, and years earlier had expressed his burning desire to kill Henry Kissinger. After he took his own life, article after article fawned over Bourdain’s “empathy” and “humanity.”
What often went unmentioned was that for all his empathy and humanity, Bourdain hung himself when his daughter, and only child, was eleven years old.
Which brings to mind another prominent Leftist who committed suicide recently: Mark Fisher. Fisher was a British Marxian theorist best known for his dubbing of the current neoliberal status quo as “capitalist realism” – which he begged humanity to reject in favor of whatever dreamed-up utopia. Whereas Marx claimed that industrialism was alienating, Fisher claimed neoliberalism was depressing, and he devoted a lot of work to framing contemporary mental health issues as a political problem caused by capitalism. In the end, Fisher lost his battle with capitalist-induced depression and killed himself. Afterwards, Fisher’s friends set-up a crowdfund in an attempt to support the wife and “young son” Fisher had left behind to fend off neoliberalism by themselves. For all his talk about solidarity against capitalism, Fisher opted out of helping those closest to him.
Kurt Cobain is a more famous, though less recent, example of this phenomenon. He was a kind of proto-Social Justice Warrior who hated what he saw as a cruel and unjust world, but then one day decided to cruelly and unjustly cheat his toddler out of having a father.
In all three cases, it is difficult and haunting to imagine a child coming of age knowing that his famous father strove for justice in the public sphere, but in private could not keep it together for the sake of his own family. (Karl Marx was the other side of the same coin. Of his seven children, only three survived to adulthood, and of those three, two committed suicide. If you knew a neighbor or a co-worker for whom this was the case, how seriously would you take his moral vision of how the world should be?)
Contrast this with the most famous suicide by a Rightist of our time: that of French veteran and historian Dominique Venner in 2013. While he did have children, all were well into adulthood by the time of his death. Consider that Venner was 78 when he died; Bourdain was 61, Fisher was 48, and Cobain was just 27. Whereas Bourdain, Fisher, and Cobain all killed themselves in private agony, Venner’s suicide was a calculated political act. He chose to shoot himself in the Notre Dame de Paris three days after France legalized gay marriage – though, importantly, he noted that France’s forthcoming Muslim majority would soon illegalize it again, and that this fate was worse than legalization itself. Venner sought to protest this in a manner as public and shocking as possible. It made a statement in a way that Fisher could have accomplished had he killed himself outside of a bank, or if Bourdain had done so in front of President Trump’s White House. On the one hand, you have a determined message; on the other, a selfish exit.
The same is true of Yukio Mishima’s suicide. His death was planned, part of a political act and a cultural statement worthy of a man of the Right. Senator John P. East, on the other hand, was being ravaged by the miserable effects of polio and hypothyroidism when he took his own life. Whether you believe horrific physical ailments justify suicide or not, they certainly are more of a justification than doing so when you are healthy and have familial responsibilities.
Bourdain, Fisher, and Cobain all decried injustice, inequality, and the like, but could not tough it out for the betterment of their own families. The excuse that depression and mental disorders distort one’s reality to such an extent that these men cannot be held responsible for their actions is just that: an excuse. We should not forgive or idolize any parent who flagrantly abandons their most sacred duty. In a sense, even putting duty aside, these men also abandoned love itself.
Tragically, though, there is an appropriateness to these suicides. The aforementioned book by James Burnham asks why any people would want to establish racial preferences in both the workplace and schools that would run contrary to the interests of their own children. Why flood your nation with hostile races that will be antagonistic to your descendants? Why bring about wealth redistribution that will keep you from ensuring the comfort and security of your grandchildren? His thesis, that “liberalism is the ideology of western suicide,” answers all these questions at once. And if you’re willing to kill your nation with your politics, and leave it to the next few generations to try and sort out the mess, why not just kill yourself as well, and leave your kids to get over it?
Related
-
Marx vs. Rousseau
-
The Counter-Currents 2023 Fundraiser: Support the Movement of Truth!
-
Jack London’s The Iron Heel as Prophecy, Part 2
-
Remembering Dominique Venner (April 16, 1935–May 21, 2013)
-
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 531 Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson and Pox Populi
-
Kooptace levice a její fatální nepochopení Marxe
-
The Machiavellian Method
-
Institutional Racism Explained
4 comments
Anthony Bourdain, like so many neurotic Jews, was a self-inflated and narcissistic boob. He was always so eager to look down on America and its White founding stock, and to exalt and revel in all things non-White. He was, at heart, a limousine liberal.
I don’t know the real reason for why he committed suicide, but it may have been due to his recent girlfriend of two years (whom he foolishly adored and gushed over in the press) who found a younger and more handsome lover (the photos in the Daily Mail were quite revealing). Public photos of them together (she was 42 and he was 61 years of age if I’m correct) gave me the impression that he was trying to somehow relive his youth. Walking around shirtless with her while sporting an excessive amount of tattoos tells me in some ways the man hadn’t grown up.
He was also a heavy drinker (a former Heroin addict too), so he had proclivities toward harmful addictions.
I periodically watched his show, ‘No Reservations,’ mostly because of my foodie interest and the exotic places he would sometimes travel to. Still, the man never seemed happy and, again, he was always drinking heavily. I’m sure this only helped feed into his depressed and neurotic nature.
His far-Left ideology also never seemed to bring him the happiness he was seeking. Neither did his money and fame. When one faithfully adheres to a suicidal and nihilistic ideology, coupled with excessive drinking, should we really be surprised when the end results in death by one’s own rope?
Lastly, Bourdain was openly and vehemently anti-White. As many of us know, this is typical of Jews who work tirelessly against our racial and cultural interests. On one episode of his show, he fully agreed with a guest he was dining with on the need for the White race to end. A world with just a shade of beige was what he envisioned for us. Would he ever speak this way against Blacks or his own people? No, of course not. But it was okay for the future of Whites who were the dominant racial group that made his show popular and which he financially benefitted the most from.
In light of this, don’t feel too bad for the preachy and self-righteous Bourdain. He was just another symptom of the Left’s insanity and, like far too many parasitic Jews, was eager to destroy the very people (Whites) who naively supported him. All I can say is, good riddance!
Western suicide for the liberal. Murder for the rest of us. Suicide is almost tame considering the state of things. We are having constructed around us an anti White terror state.
The obvious exception would be Hitler.
Marx also lived as a parasite. He took handouts from his rich uncle who started the Philips company. I have also read that some of his children died of malnutrition because of his refusal to work and therefore provide food for them. Typical. Woody Guthrie abandoned his family also and he was a communist. If they’re not Jewish, they follow Jewish ideologies.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.