Print this post Print this post

Law Enforcement & The Hostile Elite

5,091 words

The police in America and much of Europe are profoundly and explicitly anti-white. Throughout the West, the police serve an elite who are very hostile to our interests and use them as a way to extort our people out of tremendous sums of money and to criminalize those who have committed no crime. From overpolicing to taking orders directly from those who wish to see our demise, law enforcement is no ally, nor do they act like one by any stretch. But for whatever reason, among our ranks, there seems to be a lot of slack given to the police. If we really look at the situation, however, what we find are people and organizations who deserve absolutely nothing from us. No money. No support. No sympathy. Nothing at all.

The Overpolicing of Whites

There is no shortage of criticism of the police in the media or in our society, from Black Lives Matter protests that turn into riots to New York Times op-eds like “Racial Discrimination in Stop-and-Frisk.”[1] It is rather easy for those of us aligned a little further to the right of these institutions to dismiss these criticisms or even to take the side of the police and justify their actions. After all, if Black Lives Matter and The New York Times take a side on an issue, it’s generally a given that we should take the opposing side. In this case, however, nothing could be further from the truth.

The New York Times was right: There was a racial problem involved in the controversial practice of stop-and-frisk. The problem was that while the black and Hispanic populations made up about half of the population of New York City during the period in question, they accounted for eighty-five percent of those who were stopped.[2] The Left, of course, saw this as a clear-cut case of racial profiling and overpolicing. But using a per capita calculation to determine racial bias is only valid if the rates of criminality between races are at least similar. In reality, though, they are anything but. Indeed, they are so massively disparate that the only valid way to determine whether the fact that eighty-five percent of the stops were perpetrated against blacks and Hispanics was justified would be to look at the percentage of crimes committed by them. As it turns out, non-whites committed ninety-two percent of all violent crime in the city[3] and eighty-nine percent of all crime total,[4] with a higher rate of street crimes than whites. This actually indicated that non-whites were being stopped at a lower rate than their level of criminality warranted, while whites were in fact being stopped more often than they should have been.

Another common liberal argument for systemic racism in America today is that the chances of being pulled over by a police officer are higher for blacks and Hispanics – “Driving While Black.” This claim is again seductively simple: If blacks are stopped for speeding at a higher rate than whites, this must be due to systemically racist policies or racist cops. In response to this, a now-infamous study by the Public Services Research Institute in New Jersey was commissioned, using the New Jersey Turnpike as the object of investigation. It set out to discover why approximately a quarter of traffic stops were of black drivers when blacks accounted for only sixteen percent of the drivers on the Turnpike. Well, as fate would have it, the study examined over thirty-eight thousand drivers and determined that black drivers were almost twice as likely to speed on the Turnpike. Its conclusion was that blacks were actually being stopped at a lower rate than whites in relation to each group’s propensity to speed.[5] There was indeed an unfair distribution of speeding tickets in regard to race and speeding; it just so happened that, once again, whites were being ticketed at a higher rate and blacks at a lower rate in relation to their level of speeding.

Similarly, the argument made by Black Lives Matter and the media is that when population size is taken into account, blacks are shot and killed far more often than whites are by the police. This, however, is nothing but a distortion of reality. Using a per capita figure to determine this would only be appropriate if, and only if, the crime rates between the races were relatively similar – and as we have already seen, they are in fact massively disparate. Instead of simply using population percentages, we must use another metric that would more accurately account for the number of hostile police interactions each group might encounter.

A far more appropriate statistic to use to determine this would be to take the number of annual arrests for violent crime for each racial group and compare those to the number of people who are killed by the police from each race. Both violent crime arrests and police killings are generally stable each year, with no indication that the arrest rates swing wildly back and forth between whites and blacks. Thus, in 2016, 153,341 blacks were arrested for violent crimes and 241,063 whites were arrested for violent crimes.[6] Also in 2016, 234 black people were killed by police, and 466 whites were killed by police.[7] If we divide the number of arrests of whites for violent crimes by the number of whites killed by police, we find one death for every 517 arrests. In regard to blacks, we find one death for every 655 arrests of violent criminals. When we really start to look at the math here, we find that police interactions are significantly deadlier for a white man than a black man.

A study of the use of force by police that was conducted by Roland G. Freyer, Jr. found that black and white civilians who were involved in police killings were equally likely to be carrying a gun; however, police are twenty percent less likely to shoot a black suspect over a white suspect, without having first been attacked.[8] That twenty percent difference is both significant and inexplicable in light of the levels of crime committed by whites and blacks, respectively. I found it quite disconcerting that these findings were reported with headlines such as “no evidence of racial bias in police shootings” – in other words, as long as whites are being killed at a higher rate for no apparent reason, everything is just as it should be.

Further, FBI reports from 2004 to 2013 show that 511 police officers were killed during this period. Of the murderers, fifty-two percent were white and forty-three percent were black. This means that blacks are more than three times as likely to kill a police officer than a white person.[9] Nevertheless, taking into account both their respective shares of violent crime and the rate at which they kill police officers, whites are killed by the police more often than blacks are.

There is demonstrable evidence – in everything from being frisked, to receiving a traffic ticket, to being killed – that all bias in policing is in fact against the white race. And bear in mind, this is all happening while whites still make up a supermajority of police officers in the United States.

The picture of what a post-white majority America is going to be like is even grimmer in light of this data. Once American demographics have become more similar to those of Mexico, it stands to reason that our police force will likewise fall closer and closer to Third World levels of corruption.

Violation of Rights

Do you believe that it is the duty of the police to serve and protect you or your rights? Because they do neither. Nor are they legally bound to do either.

Since the Terry v. Ohio case, which widened the right of police to search and seize property from suspects, has the Fraternal Order of Police or any police department in the country decided that they would refuse to follow the new Fourth Amendment standard? Did they stand against this grave infringement of our rights and declare that they would not make use of the new “reasonable suspicion” or “may be armed” standards, in favor of the older “probable cause” standard? Or have they gleefully made use of the new, relaxed standards to violate our fundamental rights? The answer is obvious.

Over the past ten years, well over two and a half billion dollars in assets and cash have been stolen from Americans through civil forfeiture, whereby police can seize your property when they “suspect” it was used in a crime, or in the case of cash, when they “suspect” it was ill-gotten. In eighty percent of civil forfeitures, no charges are ever brought, but if the victim whose property was taken wants it back, he’ll have to hire a lawyer. You are guaranteed representation in criminal cases, but in a civil case – which asset forfeitures technically are – you must retain your own lawyer. In most cases where the assets or cash were seized from American citizens who were never found to be breaking any laws, these were simply left with the police, given that in most cases the victims of this corruption are unable to afford an attorney to redress the issue. Police departments have admitted to seizing property from people during “tight budget periods,” which frequently includes warrantless seizing of cash on the highways. Around eighty percent of those who are victimized in this way never get their property back.[10]

Police in New Hampshire arrested and charged a man with a dubious crime known as “criminal defamation of character” – namely for criticizing the police, who are public officials, online. Proving the elements of this “crime” is rather difficult and conviction is unlikely, but that isn’t the point. The police simply used this law to harass and intimidate an opponent.[11]

In Florida, the Baker Act allows judges to order the confiscation of firearms from non-criminals if they are deemed to be a “risk” to themselves or others. The Florida police have indeed already confiscated weapons and had at least one person involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility.[12] A similar story played out in Connecticut, one of several states to already have these firearm seizure laws in place, with many more considering following suit.[13] The local police departments carry out these orders every time. Article 58, anyone?


Hundreds of police departments across the nation have been quietly, and sometimes infamously, disbanded for their abuse of local residents and passersby. You can find lists of dozens of disbanded and now-defunct police departments in nearly every US state. These were more often than not in small, rural, white communities that have been terrorized and extorted by the people they paid to protect them. Waldo, Florida, a town of little over a thousand residents, was home to seven police officers who managed to write over twelve thousand tickets and take in over four hundred thousand dollars in a year’s time.[14]

And in New Rome, Ohio, a town of just sixty people, fourteen police operated a racket that also generated over four hundred thousand dollars in revenue per year, most of which went right back to the police department. You can find these same stories all over the entire nation. What you’ll find, beyond the egregious ticketing and extortion, is that this money is seldom used for the betterment of the town in which the police department in question operates. Rather they are cases of fraud, embezzlement, and thievery.

Hundreds of police departments have been disbanded all over the nation. I do not think that in the history of law enforcement, there has ever been a department disbanded because they were serving the community too well or because everybody loved them.

The Jewish Connection

American law enforcement personnel, both federal and local, regularly travel to Israel for “counterterrorism” training and to learn the latest techniques for controlling a population from Yasam.[15]

The ADL and SPLC both have special relationships with law enforcement as well. The SPLC puts out “training” videos and generates propaganda for law enforcement agencies all over the US,[16] and the ADL trains over fourteen thousand officers annually.[17] These programs serve to indoctrinate the people we pay to “protect and serve” us into believing that white men are the enemy – that white men and white “extremist” organizations are their biggest threat. I have no doubt that these programs are at least partially responsible for the clear anti-white bias revealed above. The ADL training program was in fact developed in partnership with the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, in order to ensure that the police and law enforcement agencies are used first and foremost to protect Jewish interests, while entirely ignoring, or even covering up, the abuse whites face at the hands of non-whites. The people we pay to protect us are corrupt and have been turned against us by hostile elites. This is what an occupation government looks like.

Indeed, the same people responsible for trying to wipe us off the Internet, the same people who are shutting down our social media and financial accounts, and who are generally harassing us, are the same people who are training the police officers in our communities! The Bolsheviks are training the neo-NKVD, and rest assured, to them, we are nothing but Kulaks. The type of “training” and information the ADL and SPLC provide law enforcement is why the government was so hostile to any sort of White Nationalism in the 1990s, and why they are so hostile to us now. When “It’s okay to be white” flyers were found in a Target store, the ADL contacted both local and federal law enforcement.[18]

The ADL considers the group White Lives Matter to be a hate group of terrorists – but not Black Lives Matter, of course. In their double standards, they betray their underlying ideology. Anything pro-white is deemed terrorism, and anything anti-white is a “civil rights organization.”

If you support the police, you’re not supporting who you think you are. If you donate to any of their causes, you are directly funneling cash to an organization that might kill you and your family, in your own country, in your own home, just for daring to oppose their agenda.

Randy Weaver and family, wearing a “Just say NO to ZOG” shirt.


No Duty to Protect

 The crucial fact that our people must begin to understand is that the police, be it local, state, federal, or those of many Western European nations, no longer exist to serve our interests. It is also important to understand that the police have absolutely no legal duty to protect you whatsoever.

The supreme courts of various states, as well as the United States Supreme Court itself (specifically in Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 2005), have long ruled that even in cases of gross negligence, the police are not responsible for caring for or protecting the public. Two of the more appalling state-level cases are Doe v. Calumet City (1994) and Warren v. District of Columbia (1981).

In Doe, a woman, Jane, was at home with her two small children when an intruder broke in. The intruder chased Jane outside and managed to lock her out of her home while the two children were still inside. She then ran to a neighbor’s house and called the police. When they arrived, the officers refused to break down the door or enter the home. When Jane attempted to reenter the house herself to save her children, she was restrained by the police. By the time she was able to convince them to enter, the intruder had already beaten and raped her two small children. The Supreme Court of Illinois ruled that the police owe no duty of care or rescue to the public, and therefore did not act negligently.

Similarly, in Warren, a group of people were victims of a home invasion in Washington, DC. They called the police and several officers came to the area, looked around, and then left without investigating further. The terrified victims soon called the police back, telling the dispatcher that men were in the house, although the dispatcher never relayed the call to the patrol officers. The intruders then forced three women into their car at knifepoint and took them to another location, where they were beaten, tortured, and raped for over fourteen hours. The DC appeals court upheld the trial court’s ruling that the police have no duty to ensure the safety of citizens.

But there have been far more public examples of this recently. During and after the 2016 presidential campaign, normal, everyday people have been repeatedly attacked and beaten by mobs of violent Leftists while the local police stood down. They watched it happen. They were more than happy to sit back and relax in Berkeley, Charlottesville, and at dozens of other political events across the nation while good people who merely wanted to exercise their right to freedom of speech were attacked and abused, and in some cases, hospitalized. Over and over again, the police have proven that they are more than happy to take orders from corrupt, anti-white superiors without a single care for our well-being. They have stood by as Black Lives Matter has destroyed small business after small business, ruining the livelihoods and perhaps the lives of those who tried their hand at the American dream and provided for their communities.

Time and time again in recent years, we have seen stunning displays of cowardice and a total lack of agency from the “boys in blue,” from those officers who waited well over an hour to enter the shooter Stephen Paddock’s hotel room in Las Vegas, to the four deputies hiding behind parked cars during the shooting in Parkland, Florida.


The harsh reality is that the police don’t work for you. They don’t care about you. Their pensions matter far more to them than your “rights.” As a whole, the police are a very low-agency group that thrives in an environment where they can follow orders without question.

Please, do not bother with the “good cop” argument. Where were all the “good cops” at Ruby Ridge when the order to fire came down? Where were all the “good agents” at Waco? Where were all the “good officers” in Rotherham? I’ll tell you where. They were sitting there like absolute cowards, paralyzed with fear at the prospect of having to find a real job or losing their pensions. The “bad cops” are the ones blatantly violating our rights, performing illegal searches, kicking us in the head as we lay in handcuffs, ignoring our pleas for help, and extorting our hard-earned money from us. Where are the “good cops”? They are the ones who know all about it, the ones who watch it happen, the ones who refuse to testify against their “brothers in blue,” the ones who are too afraid to stand up and have some moxie for once in their lives.

Whether you like it or not, the police and federal law enforcement are part of a very corrupt and hostile occupation force. They are not your friends. They do not work for you. They serve another master. When they are ordered to fire on unarmed citizens, they do it. When they are ordered to confiscate legally-owned firearms or other property, they do it. When they are ordered to throw people and all their belongings to the curb for not abiding by illegitimate tax laws, they do it. There are an endless number of immoral and corrupt laws that the police happily enforce – every last one of them.

Some police, I assume, are good people. But unfortunately for them, we cannot judge the actions of the aggregate based on those few. Just like when we discuss the high rate of black crime, we are of course in no way indicting every single black person in the US, but we also recognize that, as a group, there is a problem there that is adversely affecting our entire nation. Similarly, there are widespread behaviors among the police that are likewise creating an increasingly hostile environment for us, in our own homelands.

Did you support the police when they arrested and threw 89-year-old Ursula Haverbeck in prison for the “crime” of holocaust denial? Did you support the police when they arrested Wayne Bell of National Action?[19] Bell was given over four years in prison for “anti-Semitic” posts on social media. How about when several other members of National Action were arrested and thrown in prison merely for posting stickers in their own country?[20] How about when police in New York tortured an injured raccoon for twenty minutes before finally running him over to end the poor creature’s misery?[21] Or when police in Denmark fined a 17-year-old girl for her “crime” of using pepper spray on a “migrant” who had attempted to rape her?[22] Did you support them then? Let’s not forget Rotherham, England, where two fathers whose daughters had been kidnapped and were being sexually abused were able to track the girls down, but when they went to rescue them, the police arrested the fathers![23] So do you support the Rotherham police? Do you support the German police as they arrest our European cousins for thought crimes at the behest of the former Stasi agent who now runs the organization that patrols social media, looking for political dissidents?[24] Not one of these police departments works for you. They work for people who abhor you and your children’s very existence. Men all over Europe, men of our own stock, are being arrested for nothing more than protesting their brutal occupation by the hostile alien clique that opens their borders and subjects their people to genocidal rape. Can you in good conscience support those same police who know about the widespread grooming gangs, yet turn a blind eye, while they willingly arrest and jail those who share our sentiments?

When a black serial killer was arrested in Missouri, the local police said they did not know if his murders, which were exclusively of white people, were racially motivated. Odd, considering the killer had earlier threatened to shoot up a school and “kill all white people.” But the police just couldn’t figure this one out.[25] And when four blacks kidnapped and tortured a special-needs white man in Chicago, the police chief was quick to assure the public that this incident was little more than kids making “stupid decisions.”

When Dillan Tabares, a 27-year-old white homeless veteran suffering from mental illness, was gunned down by police officers, I doubt you supported them then. Or when a 29-year-old deaf white man, Daniel Harris, was killed while using sign language to try to communicate with the officer who murdered him, I doubt you made too many excuses for them. Or when Michael Dial, who refused to comply when police tried to pull him over on suspicion of driving on a suspended license but did not threaten the officers in any way, was ordered to be shot and killed by the Sheriff, who then gloated that “I love this shit” after his death, I suspect few people shared the Sheriff’s glee. And when a 26-year-old father, Daniel Shaver, was falsely accused of threatening people with a gun before being held at gunpoint by police, begging for his life for several horrifying minutes before being executed, I doubt you supported the meek, wormy-looking officer who murdered him.

You likely do not support the people who are tasked by Twitter, Google, and Facebook with policing our accounts for thought crimes. They didn’t make the rules, and they have no power to change them; they merely follow the orders of the ADL to ensure that our views are driven to the corners of the Internet. These people show far more sympathy for pedophiles and pornographers than they do towards our struggle for our people. With all that in mind, it would be rather absurd to say something like, “I support the Twitter employee who banned my account, just not the policy behind it.”

No, the entire system, from top to bottom, including all those involved, is sick. How can you, in good faith, despise Jewish State Senator Scott Weiner, who introduced bills to make it a criminal offense, with up to one year in prison, to “misgender” a person, and making it not a crime to knowingly infect someone with HIV, but then support the police who will inevitably be arresting people for the “crime” of misgendering and looking the other way while people are being infected? The various actors in this incredibly hostile occupation force are all inextricably linked. You cannot be against those making the policies on one hand while supporting the foot soldiers who uphold them on the other.

That being said, if you still want to “back the blue,” whatever that means, go ahead. But then don’t bother to try to explain why whites are being stopped, ticketed, and murdered at higher rates by police than is warranted. Don’t bother to complain about the extortion of small, rural, white towns all over the nation. Don’t worry about why your heroes are taking directives from the ADL and the SPLC. Just stay right where you are, on your knees, like a bootlicking coward. It’s lucky you have the right to remain silent, since it’s the only thing your kind ever do, anyway.

The police can act with near impunity – they only ever have to answer to some vaguely-constituted internal review boards, typically made up of their friends. This absolutely must end. In Ohio, a Jewish cop, Zachary Rosen,[26] ran up to a suspect who was handcuffed and on the ground, stomped on his head, was caught on video doing it, and was fired. Fortunately for Rosen, the Fraternal Order of Police stood by him, and he was eventually reinstated by an arbitrator.[27]

Not only do the police have no legal duty to protect citizens, but in some states, they even have statutory immunity from negligence, all while they benefit from not being personally responsible for their wrongdoings. Giving a group of low-agency people carte blanche to enforce the law while simultaneously telling them that they are in no way responsible for allowing people to be raped is not a wise policy. We must demand better.

There should be zero-tolerance policies put in place. None of this “reinstatement after review,” when their buddies decide that their act wasn’t vile enough to warrant punishment. Not only is immunity from negligence absurd, but the police, when found to be violating citizens’ rights, should be held personally liable. As things are now, they have nothing on the line whatsoever. And when people do make successful claims against police brutality, it is the taxpayers who must pay for their mistake. Instead, it is the officer who should have to pay the entire settlement, or whatever can be had after all their assets are liquidated. If they find this arrangement unacceptable, it shows nothing but their own lack of confidence in themselves to actually uphold the law, and not act above the law.

Likewise, civil forfeiture should be either ruled unconstitutional or ended legislatively. All infringements upon the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments at either the state or federal level should be reversed.

Whites are really the only racial group that I see enthusiastically supporting the police and defending them every time they decide to shoot another mentally-ill homeless person or some such thing. Now that you know the facts, I suggest that you withhold your support and demand better treatment of our people. While we might not get the police on our side for some time, we can still demand far more from them. Because currently, we are demanding nothing. There were no protests for the people whose names I have mentioned in this article. There were no riots. No cities burned. Nobody flipped any squad cars for them. It was just another day and another dead white person. It is time we insist on more from these police who live entirely on our welfare. Gone are the days when we would make excuses for those who kill, extort, demean, and violate our people and our communities. No more cowing to the servants of this hostile occupation. No more sitting idly by as our rights and our homelands are stolen from us by hostile aliens and cowardly traitors!



[1] The New York Times Editorial Board, “Racial Discrimination in Stop-and-Frisk,” The New York Times, August, 12, 2013.

[2] Jason Oberholtzer, “Stop-And-Frisk by the Numbers,” Forbes, July 17, 2012.

[3] “NYC: 92% Nonwhite Violent Crime,” The New Observer, November 26, 2015.

[4] “89% of all Crime in NYC Nonwhite,” The New Observer, March 4, 2016.

[5] David Kocieniewski, “Study Suggests Racial Gap in Speeding in New Jersey,” The New York Times, March 21, 2002.

[6] FBI, “2016 Crime in The United States – Arrests.”

[7] “Fatal Force 2016,” The Washington Post.

[8] Caroline Simon, “‘The most surprising result of my career’: A Harvard economist found no evidence of racial bias in police shootings,” Business Insider, July 11, 2016.

[9] Michelle Ye Hee Lee, “Are Black or White Offenders More Likely to Kill Police?”, The Washington Post, January 09, 2015.

[10] Robert O’Harrow, Jr., Steven Rich, & Shelly Tan, “Asset Seizures Fuel Police Spending,” The Washington Post, October 11, 2014.

[11] Mark Joseph Stern, “New Hampshire Police Charged and Arrested a Man for Criticizing Them on the Internet,” Slate, June 01, 2018.

[12] Paula McMahon, “Police Seize First Firearms under Florida’s New Gun-Control Laws,” Sun Sentinel, March 16, 2018.

[13] Eli Saslow, “After His Family Died, He Threatened to Kill Himself. So the Police Took His Guns,” The Washington Post, March 17, 2018.

[14] “Florida Town Infamous for Speed Traps Disbanding Police Force,” CBS News, October 01, 2014.

[15] Alice Speri, “Israel Security Forces are Training American Cops Despite History of Rights Abuses,” The Intercept, September 15, 2017.

[16] Anti-Defamation League, “Law Enforcement Partnerships.”

[17] Southern Poverty Law Center, “Law Enforcement Resources.”

[18] “It’s Okay to be White Cards Discovered in Boxes of Diapers Purchased at Target,” ADL, March 30, 2018.

[19] “Neo-Nazi who Branded Jews ‘Destructive and Vile’ Jailed for Posting Online Hate,” Times of Israel, May 24, 2018.

[20] “Men Guilty of Racial Hatred after Posting Stickers at Aston University,” BBC News, May 9, 2108.

[21] Stephanie Pagones. “Disturbing Video Shows Cops Charging Raccoon with Squad Cars Until They Finally Kill It,” New York Post, March 13, 2018.

[22] Outrage in Denmark as 17-year-old Girl Faces Fine for Using Pepper Spray against Sex Attacker,” RT, January 27, 2018.

[23] “Rotherham Dads were Arrested after Tracking Down Abusers,” The Star, August 27, 2014.

[24] Donna Rachel Edmunds, “German Govt Hire ex-Stasi Agent to Patrol Facebook for ‘Xenophobic’ Comments,” Breitbart, September 17, 2015.

[25] “Missouri Man, who Once Threatened to ‘Kill All White People,’ is Indicted in 2nd Set of 3 Killings,” Fox News, March 03, 2018.

[26] “Mazel Tov to Zachary Rosen and Family,” The Jewish Community Center of Greater Columbus, November 2012.

[27] “Mayor Disappointed Officer Reinstated after Kicking Suspect in Head,” ABC 6, March 05, 2018.


This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. Posted June 20, 2018 at 9:23 am | Permalink

    Very very scary stuff!

    One can only wonder how a police officer who deals with black criminals every day sincerely believes that white organizations are the greatest threat to America…

    • ster plaz
      Posted June 20, 2018 at 10:51 am | Permalink

      I think most White officers know, deep down in their minds, that it is the negro who is the pox upon our society. But they do the bidding of their political masters to keep the paycheck and then pension coming. I think both of those are true.

      • ex South African
        Posted June 20, 2018 at 12:01 pm | Permalink

        School leavers are young and naieve, lack life experience. They want to contribute toward law enforcement. They fall for the recruitement propaganda. A few years down the line they suddenly discover what it is all about. Exactly the age when they have married and the first child has been born. Now what now? They must eat and pay their rent. What would be the parachute option for those policemen and police women? Much of their training and background is pretty specialized and difficult to laterally move into the private sector if one wanted to opt out.

        In South Africa lots of the old police and security forces moved into the private security industry (now already three times as big as the government police service), or started small businesses, like gardening services. If the market was not already saturated. Some of them today sit in the U.S. army for the lack of better options. Others sat with nothing and shattered lives. I knew some of them. Very bad.

        What is the solution? The long term solution is obvious, but one needs a short to medium solution for those that do not want to play along anymore. They sit between a rock and a hard place.

      • Ambrose Kane
        Posted June 20, 2018 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

        Yes, most cops who have to work among Blacks and Hispanics know quite well how criminal and dysfunctional they are. I’ve heard even ‘minority’ cops say things about their own people in ways I would never be allowed to say. This is because the nature of police work (I’m a retired street cop) forces the officer to be real about race.

        While they may not formally describe themselves as ‘race-realists’ or even ‘pro-White,’ most cops working in ‘minority’ communities know that Blacks and Hispanics have serious and innate criminal proclivities, and little of it has anything to do with poverty or ‘lack of opportunities.’

        The interesting thing about police work is that it tends to crush pretty lies about ‘diversity’ and ‘racial equality.’ Working among Blacks each and every day, up-close and personal, gives the officer a less than rosy perspective of these people. You quickly discern that the token ‘good’ Black that some Whites hang out with is not the typical knuckle-dragging ghetto dweller that the officer repeatedly faces during each shift. You soon discover just how dirty, low-IQ, and chaotic these people really are. The comparably few who aren’t tend to surprise the officer because it’s pretty much an abnormality. Again, none of these points can truly be appreciated until one is forced to daily work among and witness their dysfunctional ways.

        Unfortunately, the commanding staff of these same police agencies are stuck deep in the mire of political-correctness and the ‘diversity’ propaganda. They are the ones who dictate the foolish policies that they do, and who perpetuate an unrealistic view of race. A good many of these same organizations are explicitly anti-White, though they conceal it with soft sounding code-words intended to disarm Whites from recognizing what is happening to them.

        Also, you’re right that the paycheck and pension keep the vast majority of White officers from speaking out. This is regrettably understandable, especially when the financial health of one’s family and retirement is at stake.

        • ster plaz
          Posted June 20, 2018 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

          Ambrose: I saw only a few negroes when growing up; I didn’t think too much of them, one way or the other, although maybe subconsciously I knew to not go near many of them. Especially when in a group, even some singly.

          But after high school, I went into the army and saw many of them. Up close. I saw them from every corner of America. They all had the same qualities. Usually negative qualities. Many were certified bone heads; making the same mistake over and over. The ones who talked a good game and giving the impression that they were competent were quite often the ones who screwed something up. Many of those would get promoted anyway.

          Most of them seemed to always be in a mood for some kind/degree of altercation with a White or if White was not available then with one of their own kind. This of course was mainly verbal altercations. But among themselves, like during off duty leisure activities, I witnessed many occasions where two/three would be having a jolly ole time and then within a moment they would be getting physical in some way/degree with each other. And they wonder why so many of them end up in the criminal justice system (outside the military, that is).

          I do understand that cops have to make their best financial decisions. I just don’t know what we will do in the future about them. Especially if we, somehow, end up in a totally White nation. I personally have not on a person to person basis ever detected any anti-White feeling from White cops. If anything it is the opposite. But as the author said, it is mainly about enforcing those higher level political correctness laws that we Whites have to worry about.

          Me? I think that more and more as time goes on we will see local/state police jobs being filled by racial quota, as the USA is swamped more and more with non-WHites. These non-Whites, who constantly complain of the treatment they receive by White cops, should demand less and less White cops out there. I can also see a fair number of White cops leaving to do some other profession/work to get away from this sewer that non-Whites and their allied Whites are turning law and thus law enforcement into.

          This all will mean a sharp drop off in the numbers of White cops. Which means there will be more encounters with non-White cops for White people to be aware/leery/worried about.

          • ex South African
            Posted June 20, 2018 at 9:01 pm | Permalink

            The sharp drop off in the numbers of White cops and an increase in non-white cops – it certainly is something to worry about. We called it moving from an eurocentric justice system to an afrosentric justice system. Jungle justice and bad policing will start prevailing, and the legal system will become part of the corruption and theft.

            In South Africa and elsewhere there will always be a hard core set of policemen who will be incorruptable and try their level best because they were born that way. But they pay a high psychological and physical price for this idealism.

            I knew some of them (when one was in the military, one quickly connects with them and they start opening up). They live like soldiers in a war zone, lots of PTSD and early pension and it has a huge negative impact on their family lives.

            But without these unsung heroes society would be far worse off. I take my hat off for them.

        • Rick
          Posted June 21, 2018 at 6:37 am | Permalink

          Ambrose I’m still working the streets but you have pretty much summed up my views in regards to this article.

          • Ambrose Kane
            Posted June 22, 2018 at 4:40 am | Permalink

            Thanks Rick, there are growing number of White cops who are starting to wake up in terms of the importance of race and of preserving one’s culture. This is inevitable anyways because the anti-White rhetoric that surrounds us has become almost deafening.

            Radical groups like ‘Black Lives Matter’ in some ways do our cause a favor because they help stir our people to a racial awakening (albeit slowly). A growing number of multicultural bubbles begin to pop among Whites ‘normies’ when they witness and start to personally feel the racial hate coming from their favorite pet ‘minority’ groups. The more radical, in-your-face, and violent these groups become toward us, the more converts to White identity we get or who are at least open to race-realist ideas.

            Anyways, stay safe out there and, when the opportunity arises, try to influence other brother officers or deputies for the racial and cultural preservation of our people.

  2. Ambrose Kane
    Posted June 20, 2018 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    As a retired police officer, I can’t really disagree with the article. I might have a difference of emphasis, but on the whole it contained serious food for thought. Although the greater majority of officers are good people who have no desire to violate the rights of others, there can be no doubt that much of police work involves implicit violations of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, especially in light of how such documents are reinterpreted by Leftist judges.

    Interestingly, these same Leftist judges also contribute to our nation’s crime problem by curbing the police from doing their job and apprehending criminals by imposing unreasonable restrictions upon them. Of course, this is interpreted as a good thing by many who are concerned about police abuse. At the same time, however, it makes legitimate crime fighting like battling a dangerous opponent with one’s arm tied behind his or her back.

    For example, to effect an arrest for DUI in most states requires excessive paperwork, admonitions, and an array of legal technicalities that often leads to dismissal by judges for the most minor discrepancy. What used to be a reasonable and relatively simple process to determine if a driver is impaired has now become convoluted legal exercise.

    All of this, including the antics of ‘Black Lives Matter’ and the general sentiment that police officers are out to ticket and arrest its entire citizenry – not to mention to shoot and murder them for ‘no good reason’ as is lamely argued by some folks – has demoralized the profession. A good many cops, then, just don’t do their jobs anymore (usually among cops in larger cities with a dominant minority population). That may perhaps be a good thing for some people, but it’s not particularly good for victims who really need to be protected by the police.

    There have indeed been abuses by cops, and while it’s true they are an arm of the current pro-Jewish and anti-White ‘system,’ the greater majority of cops are not looking to abuse nor violate the rights of the people they serve. Having no police at all would not likely be a good alternative.

    The occasions of law enforcement abuses noted in the article (e.g., Randy Weaver and others) are abhorrent, no doubt. These incidents happen and there’s no sense in defending them. Yet they are relatively few when one considers the number of contacts that officers make everyday (in the millions!), including the many legitimate arrests they make of criminal offenders which never results in abuses, violations of one’s civil rights, nor death. We must remember as well that many of these criminal offenders are thuggish Blacks and Hispanics who terrorize their own communities.

    On a positive note, there are many White cops who are and who are becoming race-realists. The very nature of the job forces them to become real about race. They also see right through the anti-White ‘system’ of which they are a part. I know this because I’ve heard the conversations among them. I’ve seen their disgust of it, and I know it has impacted the way they do their jobs.

    The law enforcement profession is still dominated by Whites, and a growing number of them are starting to realize the implicit anti-White attitudes that it has. Many of these same cops will not go quietly, and they will use whatever legal resources available to them to fight back. Eventually, the ‘system’ will break down just as all Leftist Utopian schemes do because they’re not based on reality and human experience.

    The good news is that if Whites had their own ethnostate, we would be able to structure our criminal justice system and law enforcement profession in ways that are genuinely fair and non-abusive to our people. That day, I believe, is coming.

    • Tim
      Posted June 20, 2018 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

      It’s good to know that law enforcement is monitoring Counter Currents and willing to offer the misdirection that the ADL and others teach them to feed to the naive. How many times through history has the police brutalized the “right” and then stood hat in hand with excuses after their plutocratic globalist paymasters have failed.

  3. Tim
    Posted June 20, 2018 at 12:12 pm | Permalink

    A simply look at history will validate this articles view. In both Spain, Italy, Romania, and elsewhere in the twenty and thirties of the last century the police were overtly harsh when dealing with nationalists during revolutionary periods. They are uniformed mercenaries with loyalty to none but themselves. The good news is when the time comes they will gladly turn on their paymasters if the wind is not blowing their way. That’s when the term “stood up against a brick wall” will be their just reward for selling their fellow citizens well being for a pension of shekels.

  4. active pewter
    Posted June 20, 2018 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    yeah, when the elites crammed racial integration down the throats of the unwilling white majority in the 1960s, it was the police that allowed the elites to do so…

    • Thomas Plaster
      Posted June 20, 2018 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

      And a lot of the forced integration was done with federal and state gov’t (National Guard) forces. Those overwhelmingly White troops didn’t rebel against it. Many of those, especially lower ranks, were not career men. And in those days the mass brainwashing had not reached the heights it did in the 1990s and beyond till nowadays. Even those lower ranks went quite easily along with it.

      Sobering thought. Makes one wonder how much easier today’s fed/state/local law enforcement and others will go along with enforcing these anti-White laws. And make no mistake, these laws are aimed at Whites.

  5. Voryn Illidari
    Posted June 20, 2018 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Well written article that reaffirmed things I already knew, taught me new things, and left me furious at the end.

    Support for the police simply because they are police is a MAJOR, classic White boomer trait.

    • ster plaz
      Posted June 20, 2018 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

      I would say we Whites also do the same for military service regardless of how destructive to Whites the military activity is or was. Like WW2 service; WW2 veterans and their allies think that honoring their service extends to never, never, never ever criticizing the rationale for getting into WW2. They go bananas like jews do when their extermination legend is questioned. No surprise since jews run the news/entertainment media and cannot afford any analysis of why the USA got into WW2.

  6. Magister Ludi
    Posted June 20, 2018 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

    Although mr Houck’s number and statistics are correct his view of the question is flawed. The police is indeed a tool -and also a mirror- of those in power. It is futile, and even counterproductive, to complain against it. The infantile portions of the left have been doing it already for decades and it hasn’t accomplished much. What more astute leftists did and that was far more effective as the author himself points out is to become that hostile elite that controls the police now. I repeat police forces are a mere tool of whoever wields power, a sword -or a police baton- is not evil or corrupt or whatever this article wants to accuse police forces of being; it is a mere tool. I am in no way denying the facts of this article, I agree with all of it, I think however than to antagonise the police forces would be a useless and misguided fight. Yes it is awful, but it would be a waste of our resources and energies in a very counterproductive fight that will only end bad for us and won’t accomplish anything, or would only help the enemy giving them a justification to attack us even more. It’s a suicidal move.
    Also even if all policemen were corrupt and enemies of the right, the kind of man who has in his heart the call to be a policeman or a soldier, is by nature a man of the right. If we become a culture antagonistic to police forces and the military we might discourage very useful men to join our ranks.
    A marginal observation, in my experience people who resent authority, the police particularly tend to have daddy issues -unfortunately very common these days of broken families- and are very difficult to work with. They would sabotage anything in a fit of rage because of their psychological instability whenever a project requires hierarchical discipline. People like this should be avoided like the plague.
    The police is a non issue, a distraction. The real goal is those who control the police.

    • Voryn Illidari
      Posted June 21, 2018 at 4:36 am | Permalink

      “even if all policemen were corrupt and enemies of the right, the kind of man who has in his heart the call to be a policeman or a soldier, is by nature a man of the right.”

      I can understand why a person might think this, because I used to when I was younger. However, it is a stretch. People who want to become policemen THESE DAYS tend to be people who want to have authority over their peers and good benefits. That does not make them “of the right,” that makes them a drain on the taxpayer. If they actually prevented crimes and/or meted out justice against those who commit crimes, they would not be a drain, but as the article clearly establishes, they are under no obligation to do these things.

      “A marginal observation, in my experience people who resent authority, the police particularly tend to have daddy issues -unfortunately very common these days of broken families- and are very difficult to work with.”

      Young people resent authority these days because we have seen just how corrupt and hypocritical the powers that be actually are. We see people who are supposed to be our leaders (community organizers, union leaders, cops, politicians, presidents, church leaders, school principals, and in some cases our own parents) work to destroy our civilization and race through their activities while at the same time fostering the zeitgeist that we are supposed to blindly follow them JUST BECAUSE they are authority figures. So forgive us if we don’t automatically respect some bulldog-faced asshole who wears a badge and gets his money from the taxpayer who he then extorts more money from when they go 10 miles over the speed limit.

      My rant aside, I believe the author’s point here is that police seem to be “of the Right” at first glance, but the reality is that they should not be trusted because they serve whoever butters their bread. Let’s not forget Charlottseeville

  7. inq
    Posted June 22, 2018 at 2:03 am | Permalink

    I think too that the US justice and police system is in a big trouble.

    I Remember When America Was A Free Country

    Does the New/Alt Right understand the task before it ?

  8. R_Moreland
    Posted June 23, 2018 at 3:11 am | Permalink

    The Alt Right needs to develop a party line for dealing with law enforcement officers (LEO), no doubt about it. As the article shows, trusting LEO can lead to disaster. But alienating LEO has repercussions.

    Look at LEO psychology. Society has a hierarchy:
    * Upper echelons (politicians, agency chiefs, et alia who give orders and payout the pensions)
    * Cops (LEO from the feds down to the locals)
    * Civilians
    * Perpetrators

    Being a LEO gives one power over those lower on the hierarchy, the right to legal use of deadly force, and plenty of cop buddies. Plus one gets to be where the action is. A cop is in the same social position as a medieval knight, Japanese samurai, or Praetorian Guardsman (as The Man puts it, a “new centurion”). Loss of cop status means not only loss of pension, but also being downgraded to lowly civilian (i.e., from centurion to plebeian). Thus, the desire to go along to get along.

    A common error among civilians is in thinking that being “law-abiding” puts you on the same side as the cops in a war against “the criminals.” But if you have violated the law (say, by owning a banned firearm) then you have become one of the criminals. Most civilians do not get this until they are sitting in a jail cell. Then they get it. Sometimes.

    LEO are sworn to uphold the law. If the law says “confiscate all guns,” then confiscate all the guns is what LEO will do. If the law says “monitor social media and arrest anyone who makes ‘Islamophobic’ comments,” then monitor and arrest is what LEO will do (as we see with depressing frequency in the EU). Reasonably speaking, if LEO did not enforce the law impartially, how long would civil society last? (Well, we saw what happened at the United the Right rally…)

    The various US wars on crime have given LEO powers which can and will be used against extremists and dissenters: asset forfeiture, ubiquitous surveillance, profile searches, no-knock raids, SWAT team proliferation. The Left has also pushed various repressive policies into law, notably in enforcing feminist and hatespeak regimes. The old radical slogan, “‘law and order’ are codewords for repression,” is increasingly true today as the Alt Right becomes the dissenters in a multicultic and globalized society.

    From the Alt Right perspective, common interests seem apparent with LEO. The Alt Right stands for hierarchy (like LEO); the Alt Right is opposed to urban crime (with which LEO must routinely deal); the Alt Right has mutual enemies in BLM and antifa (said groups frequently assaulting LEO in riots). Why then the apparent LEO hostility to the Alt Right (beyond any higher echelon political directives)?

    Many LEO have drunk the Kool-Aid(tm) insofar as they pay at least lip service to the ideal of all-men-are-created-equal, not very different from most Americans (or at least White Americans). Consequently, the Alt Right (like its antecedents in the racialist right) will be pigeonholed as extremists. There is the added factor that many LEO are “people of color.”

    As noted, the police were ordered to stand down in the face of Leftist/BLM rioting at Berkeley, Charlottesville, Ferguson, Baltimore, Chicago and many more cities, not to mention on many college campuses where the Left has assaulted conservative speakers. Even with a Republican controlled Congress, there has been no call to investigate the politicos responsible for the stand down orders. Nor do the DoJ or its state/local equivalents enforce existing conspiracy and incitement laws against BLM/antifa (say, under RICO statutes). Compare this sorry situation with how the Obama DoJ tore apart Ferguson to find evidence of cop “racism.”

    This situation may provide an opening for alliances between the Alt Right and the Alt Lite, MAGA folks, Second Amendment advocates, and just plain normies who have been victimized by BLM/Leftist/gangbanger violence. A common front could be formed for the tactical purpose of getting LEO to enforce the law against BLM/Leftist/urban-youth violence. Many of these groups have the political pull to get the upper echelons to change enforcement policy.

    A critical question is, how do LEO view the stand down orders and the failure of politicos to back up the cops in the streets? There has been some informal response with de-policing in certain cities. Does this indicate a wider LEO alienation from the current hostile elites? Are LEO fed up with everything from “sensitivity” commissars to having BLM/antifa chuck assorted objects at them in the streets, while the mainstream media provides the hagiography for the famous unarmed teens who were shot during the commission of crimes? Are LEO ready to stand up and be counted?

    What kind of actions could Alt Right and allied activists take to get the cooperation of LEO the next time there is a UTR style rally? How can the Internet be exploited to reach critical audiences in this regard? Can the Alt Right overcome the Kool-Aid(tm) conditioning and reach both the cops and the upper echelons who set policy for law enforcement?

    More information and discussion is required.

    Let’s see follow-on articles on this topic.

    • Natalia
      Posted December 18, 2020 at 11:24 am | Permalink

      Thank you, your response and point of view are really appreciated. Police Departments are answering to the CITY COUNCILS, but nobody ever talks about that, for some reason. The sentence about “all they care about is pensions” could go just as well for USPS, teacher’s unions, city hall or even other not so selfish law officers- lawyers, who are increasingly riding the social justice bus for personal gains camouflaged by moral wokeness. The police men of the last days of Imperial Russia were just as much abused by media, fighting political parties and liberals. Want to see what’s coming next? Read “Sun of the Dead” by Ivan Schmelev. Same powers are stirring discontent, same methods being used. I pray the outcome will differ, but not with much faith.

  9. LitDog
    Posted June 23, 2018 at 7:00 pm | Permalink

    Somewhat aside from agreeing or disagreeing with this article, one might consider why we in the alt-right pursue our goals. Some of us have been directly harmed as victims of crime or have been fired from jobs first secured only after standing third in line behind Jews and minorities. Those people see the alt-right as a necessary movement for personal and financial security.

    But most people in the alt-right care not so much about their personal security as about the security of their fellow Whites. They want to secure the existence of our people and the civilizations that only our people can create and sustain.

    As policing is not intrinsically a ZOG racket, it would be folly to believe there are not many Whites in the ranks who share our goals. But the good Whites in the police force succumb to the same pressures as their brothers in academia, law, medicine, and the corporate world. Our job is to motivate them to wisely resist those pressures.

    Though created to lionize the spirit of an eleven-year-old girl, and structured more as a character sketch, my novel Cassidy O’Callaghan nonetheless involves both asset forfeiture and the resistance of police officers to their globalist masters. COC will be on a free promotion the week of June 24.

  10. Don
    Posted June 24, 2018 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    A good article that has caused me, a reflexively pro police person, to be very skeptical of them. I’ve really re-thought my previous biases after reading this. Thanks for a good article.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace