China’s Sinister Strategy for Global DominanceF. C. Comtaose
It has always been my firmly and consistently held view that Jewry and China are the two cardinal enemies of the white race at present and for the foreseeable future. While the former remains the crux of almost all the internal problems of the white nations, the latter poses a long-term external threat as well as a challenge to the existence of the white race from a geopolitical, economic, military, and racial perspective in their competition for racial Lebensraum and limited resources.
Both of these groups harbor deep-seated and irreconcilable animosity toward whites, and the two menaces are coordinated and interlocking. It is thus no overstatement to observe that the Western nations face a dire situation of “having a tiger at the front door and a wolf at the back” (前門の虎、後門の狼 as in a Japanese proverb).
In the long run, striving to neutralize China’s menace requires a solution to the Jewish Question as a prerequisite, but in the course of removing this menace we must not forget to address the Chinese question at the same time. Achieving that certainly requires a great deal of wisdom, tenacity, determination, and resourcefulness, and calls for the full mobilization of whites. Knowing that our long-term survival hangs on nothing less than total victory over these two archenemies, we have no choice but to charge forward and fight.
The current domestic situation is characterized by the raging turmoil that has followed in the wake of Charlottesville. Faced with the combined weight and frenzied attacks of the Jewish-controlled Leftist-liberal establishment and its antifa foot soldiers, and amidst the timid, spineless forces in the “camp of the Right” falling over themselves to kowtow to the enemy by disavowing the White Nationalist movement and recriminate each other, it may seem like a luxury we can hardly afford to talk about the Chinese threat. However, it is my strong opinion that even while working hard to stabilize and fortify our united front in this unprecedented crisis, we must also pay due attention to the impending onslaught from China, because our Chinese enemy never rests and will surely capitalize on our current predicament and exploit it. In light of this, I’d like to offer a translation of a long post which was penned by a semi-official Chinese scholar and is currently being circulated on the popular Chinese online social platform, WeChat. It has been read and applauded by tens of thousands of Chinese, both the elite and commoners alike, and as such casts some light on China’s overarching imperialist ambitions and the utter ruthlessness of its long-term strategic planning.
US-Russia Confrontation: China Gains Another Golden Decade for Building Our Own Strength
Since the US expelled Russian diplomats, Russia has maintained a low profile. But recently, the US Senate and House passed a bill with a large majority to put new sanctions on Russia, which was beyond the latter’s endurance as it began to take countermeasures against the US by expelling some American diplomats on July 28. The main consequence was that the deterioration of the US-Russian relationship was made irreversible as a result of a stipulation limiting the power of President Trump which was included in the bill targeting Russia. That is to say, if the US President wants to end the sanctions against Russia, he must now first obtain the approval of the US Congress, which basically takes away the power of the President to end the Russian sanctions. The President could have vetoed this bill, but since it was passed in both houses with an overwhelming majority (there were only five “no” votes in the Senate and House combined), if President Trump had exercised his veto right, Congress would simply have voted again to overrule it. Thus, the US-Russian relationship was tied into a knot, and Trump was left with no option but to go along with the sanctions. In other words, the US political establishment used President Trump to put the final nail into Russia’s coffin. The significance of this matter for us Chinese is that another ten-year golden period of development has been presented to China on a silver platter.
It is generally understood that both before and after the US presidential election of last November, Trump has actively sought to mend ties and improve mutual understanding with Russia so as to reorient the power of America to concentrate on containing China, because China is now the second-largest power globally and is regarded as potentially the most powerful rival of the US, both in terms of economic strength and global influence. Trump’s judgment is certainly correct from the standpoint of America’s interests. However, the subtlety of American politics lies in its checks and balances. Although Trump is in the Republican Party, which holds a majority of seats in the US Congress, American politics, besides its two-party system, has a latent and implicit rule, namely that nothing which threatens the interest of the elites is tolerated. That’s why, although Trump is a Republican, his own party has teamed up with the Democrats and turned against him because he intended to change the rules of power that were formulated and played adroitly by America’s elite group. Trump, like a bull in the chinaware shop of the American political elites, was eventually rendered unable to realize his ambitions. You can call it either an advantage or a shortcoming of American politics, which is still a game played by only a handful of America’s elites.
American politics aside, let’s look at Trump himself. The “Russiagate” incident stoked up by Obama, Hillary, and company has put Trump in an awkward and straitjacketed situation. To avoid being impeached by the elites, Trump had to adjust his thinking and strategy. He not only has to go along with imposing sanctions on Russia, but he must continue the confrontational stance vis-à-vis Russia in America’s global strategy, which makes China the largest beneficiary of such a strategic result. The impairment of US-Russia relations is something China desired the most, and now, without any intervention by us, the American elites have delivered this outcome to our doorstep. Regardless of their actual intentions, they did us a big favor.
We are witnessing Russia beginning to fight back against the relentless US offensive, and Europe has also expressed strong concerns over the new penalties it imposed on Russia since they will adversely affect Europe’s interests as well. The trade volume between the US and Russia is small, and sanctioning Russia will have little negative impact on the US, but trade between Europe and Russia is much more significant. Considering that the major EU member states are still living with the negative consequences of the 2008 financial crisis to a certain extent, plus thorny issues like Brexit, the migrant crisis, and recurring terrorist attacks, Europe is fumbling and stumbling, and if it suffers collateral damage in the US-Russian confrontation, further injuries will be sustained by both Europe and Russia.
The most miserable party will be Russia itself, however. The fact that the international price of oil still hovers below fifty US dollars per barrel is fatal to the recovery of the Russian economy. Meanwhile, Russia has been fighting in Syria for more than a year, which is also fatal to Russia, as its feeble economy cannot sustain a protracted war. For the foreseeable future, Russia will have to clench its teeth and persist with its war effort in Syria while also dealing with the still-simmering Ukrainian situation. Putin cannot afford to back off, as his personal legacy hangs on the issues of Syria and Ukraine. Under such an extremely pinched circumstance, the only option Russia has is to continue to lean on China and act as its follower and sidekick politically, economically, and even militarily, and will even have to cede some of its geostrategic interests to China.
Europe will continue along its path of alienating the US, and American-European unity will soon collapse. The dispute between Europe and the US is over differing interests, and will further divide them. While the UK will probably go along with US, which is a predictable outcome based both on history and present realities, nevertheless a Europe without the UK will very possibly unify in the face of various crises and put an end to their internal disputes and division. For all the differences in interests and ambitions on the Continent, Germany and France will still have to band together to deal with the US, while the latter will continue to sow discord and division among the European states, as a divided Europe suits the interests of the US. But such a stratagem may backfire and rather push the situation toward a more stabilized Europe centered on Germany and France, which will in turn choose to cooperate with China on many major international issues. A notable example of this concerns the defense of the Paris Agreement on climate change, where the G20 nations united to isolate the US with an overwhelming 19 to 1 vote. In the future, the European countries may cast aside American opposition and seek to improve their relations with Russia. As I analyzed in a previous article, if the US and Russia solve their differences and come together, it will make Russia strong again and engender anxieties and opposition in Europe, as Europe alone cannot handle Russia’s military threat; but if the US and Russia break off relations, with Russia’s economy collapsing, Europe by itself will not be able to face the threat from the US, either. Thus, Europe definitely doesn’t want Russia to fall when the latter is taking beatings from the US.
Continuing hostility between the US and Russia is the best scenario for China. Without paying much of a price, we can make Russia dependent on us, and such dependence will be comprehensive and ensure that Russian politics and its economy move toward our side all the more closely and tightly, while a Europe in continuous decline will be forced to seek a new friend, which won’t be the US and can only be China.
Viewing the present world from a broader international perspective, we can see that subtle changes are taking place in today’s global situation. At first sight, all the major powers, including China, the US, Russia, Europe, and Japan, face difficulties and major challenges of their own, but a careful study reveals that among all of these powers, only China is benefitting from the current global structure. Owing to the fact that the US-Russian relationship has already been tied into a knot that cannot be unraveled, which was caused by the domestic politics of the US, it means that even if this was poison, the US would swallow it knowingly. If the US had beaten Russian down and caused its downfall and disintegration in the near future, and then turned back to deal with an isolated China, China would be under unprecedented pressure. However, if China stands back-to-back with Russia, it will make Russia both unable to recover and yet impossible for it to fall, and the US won’t be able to free its hands to deal with China. In the meantime, the American political situation will continue to sink into a mess, and hand a most important “golden decade” to China in this most critical time for it to chase after and eventually overtake the US. Ten years from now, China will no longer fear the US in the political, military, economic, financial, cultural, and all other fields; it will be on a completely equal footing with the US by that time.
China must take full advantage of this golden decade, when the US and Russia are at loggerheads and the US-European discord is intensifying, to actively and effectively implement the following six agendas of its own:
1. Exploiting Russia’s difficulties and feebleness, and pushing it to cede interests to China in the Far East. There is one significant event which many of my readers might not have noticed. China’s Jilin province and Russia signed an agreement to jointly construct wharfs at the estuary of the Tumen River [Translator’s note: Tumannaya Reka in Russian]. For historical reasons, China currently has no port on the Sea of Japan in its northeast region, so the Sino-Russian joint effort to build a port there is a significant strategic breakthrough for China. But in my opinion, this is still not enough. We should continue to capitalize on Russia’s difficulties and press it to cede, or at least lease, a piece of land to China for a period of ninety-nine years or longer, so that China can build a port of our own in the northeast region. The port can be a trading port at first, and then be converted into a naval base later, which will allow China to construct a northeastern fleet to directly threaten Japan’s home islands. By looking at a map, one can see that China and the Japanese main island do not face each other directly because of the Korean Peninsula between them. If China can manage to acquire a naval base in its northeast facing the Sea of Japan, Japan will fall into China’s pincers and be unable to defend its head and tail at the same time. If China can accomplish this great strategic layout in the next ten years, it will be able to encircle Japan completely, and once a war with Japan breaks out, China will enjoy a great strategic advantage.
2. Taking back Taiwan. Since Taiwan occupies a strategically central position in terms of China’s outward march toward the Pacific Ocean, if it falls under American control, it is inevitable that China would be contained by the chain of islands dominated by the US; if, however, China annexes Taiwan, this chain of islands set up across the entire Pacific Ocean will collapse on itself, and the prospects for China’s Big Ocean Strategy, Blue Sea Strategy, and so on will all look like a cloudless blue sky, bright and smooth. The US will no longer have any means to contain China, and both the US-Japanese alliance and China’s current predicament in the South China Sea will dissolve. Again, if China can take back Taiwan in the upcoming golden decade, it will go down in history as a great undertaking that will be remembered in a thousand years.
3. Beating down India and thwarting India’s growth. Recently, India invaded a border area of Tibet. This reflected India’s foolish arrogance and the lack of a correct self-understanding on the part of many Chinese, but it also disclosed India’s ambitions, which is not only one of the fastest growing economic powers in the world, but which also possesses a huge population base and occupies a crucial position on the Indian Ocean, thus posing a significant threat to China’s grand strategy on the Eurasian continent. If China fails to deal a devastating blow to India when it is in the middle of crossing a river, once it completes crossing that river and reaches its full state of development, it would be extremely difficult for us to contain or defeat it. Some people think that launching a military strike against India now will affect our strategy against the US. But in fact, if China can muster its determination and resources to beat India down in one swoop by taking full advantage of the excellent opportunity presented by India’s current invasion of Chinese territory, it will have a profound and lasting value not only for the present but for the future as well, as it will help cement a permanent condition of a divided and underdeveloped India, thus ensuring a most favorable scenario for China. Viewed from a historical standpoint, the Indian nation is one that is used to being conquered and ruled by foreign powers, and basically it lacks a fighting spirit. Such a national trait is favorable to China’s plan to dismember India. In the upcoming golden decade, if China can manage to prevent India from becoming an economically developed, militarily powerful, and united country, it will do great service to China’s development of a “One Belt, One Road” strategy.
4. Attaching great importance to the role of Burma and the construction and development of a Sino-Burmese economic corridor, in addition to a Sino-Pakistani economic corridor. Many people nowadays fail to perceive the importance of Burma in China’s grand strategy. During the anti-Japanese war, the Chinese expeditionary force marched to Burma to fight. Why did China send its elite forces to fight in Burma then? Because Burma was the only gateway connecting China with the outside world at that time. Now, despite it no longer being our only point of contact with the outside, Burma is still our key to break through the Malacca predicament and shatter the combined containment effort of the US, India, Singapore, and Japan. If China fails to defeat and dismember India very soon, our strategic alternative against India is to leverage the Sino-Pakistani and Sino-Burmese corridors in order to break India’s dominant position on the Indian Ocean and set up a pincer movement against India from above and below. Therefore, in the next ten years, China should make good use of the present relatively secure and relaxed environment to rope in and win over Burma by adopting political, economic, commercial, financial, and military means aimed at promoting the resurrection of Sino-Burmese ties such as by increasing investments, and perhaps even by launching military interventions if necessary, so as to form a community of common interest and strategy between China and Burma.
5. Stabilizing the South China Sea. After the Philippines changed its attitude, the Sino-Philippine relationship started to warm up and the situation in the South China Sea began to stabilize accordingly. But this is far from satisfactory. The goal of China is to make the South China Sea our inland sea over which China exercises absolute control, and to make sure that none of the extra-regional countries can interfere in regional affairs. Recently, the US, Japan, India, and Vietnam have frequently challenged China in the South China Sea. I believe the crux of the next phase of the South China Sea issue lies in Vietnam. If Vietnam changes its stance on the matter, as the Philippines did, the South China Sea will basically get stabilized; our main approach to Vietnam should be to attempt to control it economically and to turn it into an economic vassal of China. On the other hand, if Vietnam makes any bold and impudent move disproportionate to its small stature, we should deal it a heavy blow and make it behave. If we can finally make both the Philippines and Vietnam recognize China’s leadership position in the South China Sea, it would be extremely difficult for any external power to try to create troubles for us there.
6. Establishing a closer strategic relationship with Iran. Looked at either historically or geopolitically, Iran is a very important country. We might even say that Iran occupies the strategic hub in the future of the Eurasian continent. At present, besides fixing its eyes on Russia, the US is also looking at Iran. After throwing Middle Eastern countries such as Iraq, Syria, and Egypt into internal turmoil, the US will never rest until it completely destroys Iran. Getting even closer to Iran ought to be the Chinese strategy, not only because we have huge investments there, but also because it is extremely important to the advancement of our grand design in the “One Belt, One Road” plan. Strategically speaking, through the Sino-Pakistani economic corridor, the China-Pakistan-Iran pathway will be in place; plus, with the coordinated support of Russia in Syria, the “One Belt, One Road” design and China’s Eurasian grand strategy will eventually be realized. We must fully support Iran in its conflict with America for our own interests, and we should never allow Iran to be beaten down by the US. We shall spare no effort to make Iran a hard thorn in the side of the Middle East for as long as possible.
A prolonged confrontation between the US and Russia offers China a supreme and irreplaceable strategic opportunity – a grand opportunity brought to us by the political division and societal fractures in the US, which we must seize and make full use of in order to diffuse major challenges that China currently faces in its international relations one by one. In another ten years, an even more powerful China will emerge on the world stage, and with China’s powerful status will come profound and far-reaching changes to the global structure, and China will have more and more friends [Translator’s note: read “lackeys”]. So long as China accomplishes the six tasks mentioned above, the American-Japanese-Indian alliance will collapse of its own accord, China will indeed become a strong and unified country, and the Chinese people will surely take pride in China’s power and glory.
[End of translation]
This is a long and well-organized article, built around a central idea about how to achieve China’s vast imperialist ambitions for global hegemony in the next “golden decade,” primarily by exploiting conflicts between the US and Russia and utilizing China’s economic clout to pressure or browbeat other, lesser powers. His discussions are sound and carry a clear and unmistakable message of barefaced hostility against all non-Chinese nations. The whole article exudes a strong sense of cynical and callous ruthlessness and disingenuousness that is typical of the Chinese culture and mentality, such as its gloating over the political and social confusion of the US and a gleeful desire to exploit it to further undermine and weaken the country, its cold calculation of the means and methods to be utilized to contain Russia, as well as a dismissive, perhaps even destructive, arrogance toward lesser countries such as Japan, India, and Vietnam. Moreover, the fact that this hatred-suffused, muscle-flexing, and swashbuckling article has been widely circulated online and well received by many in China, including college professors, points to the current popularity of Chinese uber-nationalism, which has reached a level of nothing less than rabid chauvinism and jingoism.
In some places, the article also displays an ignorant, limited, or simply wrongheaded understanding of American domestic politics and US-Chinese relations. For one, it never mentions the Jewish factor in causing all the political and social problems of the US and in shaping those neocon foreign policies that are antagonizing Russia and which fundamentally harm the real national interest of the US; it simply makes use of the general term, “elites.” For another, the author of this article repeatedly claims that the US wants to “contain” or “deal with” China once it defeats Russia, but this is actually a far cry from historical truths and realities. In fact, it is the very ruling political and economic establishment centered on Jewish elites that has been working hand-in-glove with China and actively assisting the latter’s rapid rise and power expansion for three decades and counting. This has been accomplished through the transfer of capital and technology, and by turning a blind eye to China’s rampant industrial and military espionage in the US. The author’s refusal to touch the crucial Jewish question in American politics and the de facto Chimerican symbiosis that essentially characterizes the status quo of today’s US-China relations might indeed be a result of his ignorance, but it is more likely that he deliberately and disingenuously judged that bringing up the Jewish role in American mainstream politics and the hidden side of the US-China relationship would not serve his main purpose, and was thus unnecessary, if not counterproductive. The article as it stands suffices to galvanize the Chinese masses to his hyper-nationalistic and pugnacious message and to cause them to rally all the more tightly around the current Chinese regime merely by inciting them to hate a West that is “bent on” containing China, while suppressing the real picture of the American and Chinese elites, which are conspiring to establish a plutocratic new world order ruled by Jewry and its globalist cohorts.
The focus of this article is on China’s strategies vis-à-vis the US and Russia. From the discussions in general and the first of its six points in particular, China’s vast and sinister ambitions are clear to see, as is its flagrant attempt to further capitalize on the current US-Russian division by driving a wedge, or to put it more accurately working to perpetuate the existing wedge, between the US and Russia. China is using Russia as a pawn in the grand chessboard of its global power game. It is obvious beyond any doubt that China is hostile to both the US and Russia and regards both of them as stumbling blocks on its road toward global hegemony, and is determined to sweep them away by whatever means possible. China fears and hates a friendly US-Russian relationship more than anything else and will spare no effort in trying to perpetuate and deepen the current difficult US-Russian relationship. And China’s fear and hostility equally applies to other bilateral relationships as well, such as the prospect of an improved US-Iranian relationship. It can also be discerned from the article that China views Russia with dismissive contempt, especially in regard to Russia’s underweight economic status compared with its own, and is therefore keen to maintain and intensify Russia’s economic weakness and subsequent dependence on China. It won’t hesitate to exploit, divide, hinder, and perhaps even attack Russia eventually when it deems itself to be overwhelmingly more powerful than Russia and has completely extracted Russia’s surplus value. The current Sino-Russian honeymoon relationship is but a thin, glossy veneer of diplomatic duplicity and unctuousness veiling cynical and cunning Chinese calculations. Let’s bear in mind the fact that China has claimed sovereignty over a large chunk of land mass in Russia’s Far East totaling more than one million square kilometers, and has consistently instilled in its own populace a strong sense of historical grievance against Russia that has kept it simmering in the collective Chinese mentality, dwarfing the dispute over four tiny islands to the northeast of Japan’s Hokkaido Island of Japan in comparison.
It is also my strong wish that this piece is spread among Russian nationalist circles so that they become more alert and vigilant concerning the latent Chinese menace. Likewise, considering the decidedly vile and diabolic intentions the Chinese hold toward India, Taiwan, and Vietnam, and the recent escalation of the armed standoff along the Chinese-Indian border, it behooves any nationalist Indian, Taiwanese, or Vietnamese who reads this article to spread the message wide and loud in their own circles.
Finally, I’d also like to call attention to a caveat that would help dispel some confusion regarding China’s aims and targets. Many White Nationalists who rightfully embrace the collective racial identity of the white race tend to dismiss today’s America as an outdated and useless idea, a mere political entity bound together by inimical and artificial laws that totally disregard or marginalize whites, which I sincerely agree and sympathize with. These same people may think that it doesn’t really matter if a surging China is about to displace the position of the US in today’s world since they do not identify with the corrupt and decadent state that it is today. I fully understand this rationale, but feel it vitally necessary to point out that China, as an alien and fiendish power whose many character traits bear a striking semblance to those of Jewry, never distinguishes between the whites of various national groups, whether it be the US, the UK, France, Germany, Australia, Russia, and so on. For the Chinese, the US and white Americans are one and the same concept, just as are the UK and white Britons, Russia and white Russians, and so on. They are all whites and objects to be conquered in China’s quest for global dominance, in their eyes. When China thinks about defeating and subjugating America or Australia or Russia, they are thinking about defeating and destroying the white racial stock of those countries. Since the US is currently still nominally the most powerful country, China targets the US, and specifically its white population, as its main enemy. Therefore, even if White Nationalists in the US feel no allegiance to it as a polity, they are essentially the same thing in the eyes of the Chinese as potential adversaries to be subdued or eliminated. Hence, even if you have chosen to forfeit your love for the US in your heart, you still have an obligation to resist and foil the Chinese plan to dislodge and decapitate America simply for the sake of defending the interests of the white race: her sovereignty, dignity, and ultimate survival.
To do that, the ideal and only effective way other than an all-out war with China is absolute, total, thorough, inexorable, and irrevocable disengagement with China. The illusion of transforming China through active economic and cultural engagement, as was promoted by US political and economic elites and practiced by its presidents from Nixon to Trump to varying degrees, has already proved an utter failure by ironclad facts that amply demonstrate the self-deluding and self-defeating nature of such a policy. China today is not only conducting blatant industrial and military espionage activities in the US and other Western countries, it’s also actively buying off the resources of the Western nations and using its increasing financial clout to silence voices of criticism and dissent, besides exporting its Fifth Column to the West through immigration as a potential Trojan Horse. The pieces of evidence for this are simply too large to count. We are talking about a people whose collective culture tells them to feel no qualms about lying, cheating, and stealing in order to get to the top. The West has engaged China only to continuously feed and fatten a tiger of an insatiable, bestial appetite until the moment it pounces on its feeder and devours him. Trade with China must be ended, all transportation to and from China in the form of people and goods must be ended, all capital and technological investments in both directions must be ended, and all academic communications must be ended, so that the poisonous tentacles sucking blood and nutrients from the body and spreading disease and vice to the mind of the white race will be cut off once and for all.
And if whites intend to safeguard their homes from the Chinese peril, we must first topple the rule of the established elites, Jews and gentile traitors alike, who have opened the gates to the Chinese flood and who continue to encourage it. The globalist, consumerist, nihilistic, and hedonistic ideology must be debunked, delegitimized, and demolished on the public stage. To accomplish this critically important mission of reclaiming our own fate and tuning back the tide, we need to educate and awaken our people, muster their collective strength to fight, and train a tough, reliable, and resourceful elite force of our own to lead and inspire. That’s where the value and significance of the work of Counter-Currents lies.
Obituary for Prof. Roger Pearson, M.Sc. (Econ.), Ph.D., (London): 1927–2023
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 526 Cyan Quinn Reports from CPAC & More
Dr. Roger Pearson on His Life & Work
CPAC 2023: The Republican Party is Dying Out
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 525 On Capitalism, Socialism, & the Ethnostate
La Russie et l’Ukraine, à nouveau
Nothing Is True, Everything Is Possible
Trump’s Great Secretary of Defense
Thank you Riki-Eiki Rei for this fine and enlightening article that puts the Chinese menace in the foreground. And the emphasis on how Jewish interests coincide with that of China, with American elites (heavy Jewish representation) promoting hostility with Russia for Chinese benefit.
This all underscores the madness of “Silk Road White nationalism” where Whites become puppets of Chinese-Jewish interests in order to “inflict harm” on Russia. And why?
“Exploiting Russia’s difficulties and feebleness, and pushing it to cede interests to China in the Far East.”
Indeed. Capturing the Russian Far East is one of the Silker’s main strategic objectives.
It has been said that the past is prologue, if that observation is correct we can expect Russia’s reaction to their particular ‘wolf at the front door tiger at the rear door’ impasse to be similar to that faced by Prince Alexander Nevski in the 1240s. He had the Teutonic Knights at his front door and the Mongol steamroller at his rear. He chose to take on the more culturally threatening but less formidable enemy, namely the Teutonic Knights. Russia became a vassal state of the Mongols but Russian culture and the Orthodox Church survived to safeguard the future national rebirth. We appear to be witnessing the reformation of the Mongol Empire, more so, if Iran and Turkey ‘rejoin’ the fold.
These events would leave Europe defenseless to the Jewish elites controlling America. They will be able to destroy Europe at their leisure, as they are doing now.
Riki-Eiki, is it possible for you to put the link to the original article in Chinese?
Mr. Willanders, thanks for asking. As a matter of fact, as I did quickly mentioned in my writing itself, the original article was found by me on the popular socializing online platform in China called “WeChat” which is largely non-traceable to its origin. Then I tried making a quick search online, and to my pleasant surprise, dozens of the relevant websites featuring the article popped up, which testifies to the popularity of it in the Chinese cyberspace. Since you asked for the original Chinese version, I presume you can also read Chinese language seamlessly, so here are few majors links among many of them of this article as follows for your reference.
As a side note, on some but not all occasions, the original article seems to feature a short three-paragraph foreword or introduction condemning and castigating South Korea, Japan and Britain on different matters but all for the same reason of following US to “contain China”. I had not read this part when encountering the WeChat version of the article, so I didn’t translate them in the first place. The rest and the main body of the article is identical to what I translated.
Thank you for continuing to spread the truth. I have been back in China this summer and the experience made me more firmly opposed to everything the Party stands for than ever. The Chinese are made ignorant by all the censorship. The information of the outside world is what can save them. That is why the Chinese Communists wish to breed ignorance. They want to use Chinese for their diabolic plans, and I oppose this demonic exploitation. I have not been online for a while and I was too busy studying (which is important because going back to China as a political dissident is no good, I prefer to be a free person who is a world citizen as long as I cannot live safely in my country because of its Communist ideology). I wanted to see China one last time before never returning again unless Communism falls. I did so with quite a few risks, because I have a history of falling out with the Communist Party and I have been excommunicated for misconduct and political treason (which to me is a good thing because finally I am no longer officially a Party member). For this reason, I entered China using a false identity. I got in and got out safely, but I will never do this again. The risks are too high and I do not want to involve my family in my own struggles. However, I know they will go after my family soon so they cannot go back either. We have moved our wealth already outside of China (many wealthy Chinese families move their wealth out through Macao, which my family also did). I come from a family of high-ranking Communists, and that is why I was groomed to be one as well and I would have had a bright future, but circumstances woke me up to reality, and my family as well. This is all I can say (with regard for my personal and my family’s safety because you never know the reach of the Chinese government online). I hope you can excuse me for not being in touch with you earlier, but I would like to correspond more with you. I am willing to help and to provide intelligence on China. I have no problems sharing ‘state secrets’ either. You can directly contact me on my blog (just google Chinese Nationalist Maiden). You can also find me somewhere on Disqus (it is possible to find my disqus account via Google).
“I have been back in China this summer”
Thank you for sharing your personal background information with us readers. You certainly have a clear understanding of right and wrong and a firm conviction against the evil neo-imperialist communist rulers of China today, which is very heartening. And your moral courage against the current Chinese regime despite your quite distinguished family background within the establishment is also highly enlightening and inspiring.
Besides, considering your extraordinary status, which can certainly provides a lot of previous and invaluable insight to the Western world on the question of the menace and peril posed by today’s China, you are sincerely and warmly encouraged to write more online and spread the relevant and revealing information to the western people including to reader of Counter-Currents.
Your experiences remind me of a statement I used to hear and like very much from an old movie depicting a spy story during the Cold War, which goes like: “I take my side by my conscience and conviction, not by the accident of birth”. and I think you are epitome of this statement. Anyhow, please take good care of you and your families and do your best within your capacity for the good, true and beautiful as opposed to the fake, evil and ugly, which are embodied by today’s Chinese regime. I wish you the best luck in all your brave and just endeavors.
Thank you so much for your reply. Your words of praise make me feel shy, but you speak the truth. I care a lot about morality and I have followed my heart, which led me away from Communism. I will keep on informing people about the ugly truth regarding the Chinese Communist Party and their collusion in the Jewish agenda. The Soviet Jew who helped found the Chinese Communist Party was Grigori Voitinsky. Without him, there would have been no Chinese Communist Party. Unlike the way it is portrayed in our Party meetings, the spreading of Communism to the Far East by Jews such as Voitinsky was no altruistic endeavour. It was only Jewish self-interest.
Is there a way to find out more about this author? How do we know he is a semi-official scholar?
Also, is there a way to see how widely this article was read on each platform? It looks like two of the links no longer work. How do we know it has been read by tens of thousands?
I showed this to 2 young Chinese (1 of whom is Taiwanese). The Chinese guy didn’t reveal much. The other found it to be mostly true, but didn’t think China would benefit so much. Not much to go on.
Garrett, the author’s name can be easily found in the content of the webpage my supplied links lead to, and a quick search on the main Chinese search engine Baidu will reveal his background as a “semi-official scholar”, holding teaching positions in Chinese university and research institute is an obvious sign of it, judging from the very nature of the academic establishment in China. Of course, you’ll have to understand Chinese pretty well to find all the information.
I don’t know what you were talking about when you said the two of the links no longer work. I’ve just checked the three links I provided in the previous comment, all three of them function perfectly and all showed the original Chinese article instantly. And mind you that the three links I provided were but a small part of the Chinese websites displaying the article online, there are literally dozens of others there posting this article, in addition to the one I encountered and read on the separate and now feverishly popular Chinese mobile platform that is the WeChat (微信) where this article is also being widely floated and shared by a multitude of WeChat subgroups online. Based on the above facts, it is a natural, foregone conclusion that the article has been read by tens of thousands if not more.
Chinese seldom if ever reveal their true opinions or feelings to foreign outsiders even if they are ostensibly your friends. Disguise and duplicity are their trademark characters. Unless you live among them, which I mean within their communities and even in their close circles for a considerable period of time, you never know what they truly hold in their mind. Of course there are exceptions or eccentrics even among the Chinese who will somehow choose to speak their mind honestly to you, but that is a rare case and depends on circumstances and motivations.
Thank you for such a thorough response. The Weibo link doesn’t work for me, the others do.
My grasp of Chinese isn’t great, but I can translate well enough with enough time.
I believe I am in a position to know the genuine motivations of at least one Chinese person. As for the rest, their goals, ideas, and feelings all seem mind-numbingly mundane to me. Being able to compare people in China vs. HK, Taiwan, etc. has enabled me to see the differences in what they believe and care about. But perhaps, as you suggest, I have only scratched the surface.
Seconded, I would love to show this to some Chinese and try to gauge their reactions.
(I will also try to find it myself)
Good. But here is a caution from me: The Chinese to whom you show the article and expect a reaction may not speak their truthful mind to you, and instead feign friendliness and innocence. Collectively speaking, dishonesty, disingenuity and duplicity are the biggest part of the Chinese national traits, and they are used to and adapt at this as demonstrated by their own various ancient adages such as “putting honeydew on the lips while harboring a dagger in the heart” (口蜜腹剣), which is similar to the phrase “velvet paws hide sharp claws” in meaning. On the other hand, with China’s rapid surge and power expansion, some may become haughty and snooty, and swooned by their own “illustrious successes”, coupled by a latent “in your face” desire toward the West, thus can’t help showing off a little bit and disclosing their true mind. So you may expect some differing results from different Chinese individuals whose reactions to this article you are trying to gauge. Please just bear this cautioning in mind when you conduct your test.
Chinese like to feign ignorance, but they know a lot more than they pretend to. They like to appear ‘cute’ and ‘harmless’ to everyone. Face matters a lot in Chinese as well as other East Asian societies. Westerners have trouble understanding this. They tend to think they can get some quick truthful reactions from Chinese. However, the only way to know their real opinion is to spend lots of time with them and to wait for a moment the truth comes out. The method can be summarised thus: ‘Never let go of your Chinese counterpart’. If you have the intention to always watch a Chinese, then you are starting the relationshio with the right attitude. That is your only hope for truth and justice. For Whites it may also help to watch Asian dramas. I admit it may be boring at first, but you get a good idea of how sticking around people is a strategy also employed by Asians themselves to find out to the truth and to exact justice. Chinese are frenemies you should keep close if you want to render them harmless. Never give in to their interests, never forget your original goals. China is a threat because Jewry made them that way. This is the calculated result of anti-White Marxism being exported to China with the help of Soviet Jews who hated White Russians. What Communism means to Chinese today is the eternal hatred of ‘imperialists’ which is code for non-Chinese such as Japanese and Whites. Anti-imperialism, which is the true meaning of Communism in China, is anti-Whitism. Marxism has acted as an anti-White vehicle in the rest of the world as well and therefore it is not surprising. However, with the Chinese tendency to perfect whatever system they live in, Communism has reached unprecented levels of anti-Whitism in China. This cannot be ignored. Whites think China does not matter, but it does. My attitude towards China is that of the Christian missionaries (even though I am a pagan Chinese who worships the old Gods in much the same fashion as Japanese Shinto): to save the Chinese souls from the evil of this world and to teach them about salvation. Chinese are fatalists (i.e. people who passively resign to their fate) and this is being exploited by the Chinese Communists. Chinese think there is no other way but to cave in to group pressure. However, the only way to save China from this disease of anti-Whitism which can truly lead to an unprecendented ‘holocaust’ (if ever there is going to be one) of the White race is to do what Chinese Communists fear: engage in altruistic efforts to remove Chinese people from the claws of the Party. The Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party (a work you must read) is doing that missionary work. It would be better if even more people, including Westerners, were involved in converting China to a more realistic and more benevolent worldview that can benefit humanity and the White race. Currently, China is on collision course with the entire world. They should be stopped by means of psychological warfare (missionary work in and outside of China) and if actual war cannot be prevented, the world must stand up against China. The pseudohistorical narrative of the Nazi German threat will soon be forgotten once real history tells the story of the Communist Chinese threat to the entire world. My attitude to my own people is simple: convert or die. They can either all die in the carnage of a war against the world or they can all convert and actually live a peaceful existence (although at first some extreme violence may be required to get rid of the Party ending the life cycle of the current Chinese government). China must convert or else it is not going to survive. What exactly China must convert to is an important question, and it is answered in part by The Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party (readily available online). There is an opportunity for White Nationalists and other race realists here alike. We can determine the future of China and the world if we can develop a good narrative to present to the Chinese public to dissuade them from their (fatalistic support for) malevolent views. Chinese do not need to be resigned to such fate (which will obviously lead to oblivion). I must say Chinese are particularly willing to kill off their own race (never forget the one child policy and its disastrous racial implications for the present and beyond). This tendency is not good because it will pose some challenges to dissuade Chinese from their current suicidal worldview that they feel resigned to as their fate. The world depends on this. The truth must be taught to Chinese: either they convert or die, and that is the most benevolent thing we can tell them. Chinese listen to realistic threats, but ours is not just a threat, it is moral to tell them the truth. We are saving them and humanity, and if they cannot be saved, at least we save humanity. This is the most altruistic attitude, and it is utterly realistic. I care a lot about Chinese and so much so that I believe they ought to be given the choice to convert anf otherwise they must be finished off. If it seems already certain they must die, then at least give them a chance to prove they are not worthy of death. That is the most humane option left. I am not advocating mass genocide of my own people, but I know harsh measures are needed to counter the worldview instilled in the Chinese people by the Maoist Cultural Revolution.
“Chinese like to feign ignorance, but they know a lot more than they pretend to. They like to appear ‘cute’ and ‘harmless’ to everyone. Face matters a lot in Chinese as well as other East Asian societies. Westerners have trouble understanding this. They tend to think they can get some quick truthful reactions from Chinese.”
Oh, indeed. I completely agree.
There seems to be a lot of bravado, hidden frustration and wishful thinking in this article. For one, China will never retake Taiwan as long as Taiwan enjoys US support. All the odds are in Taiwan’s favour, there is simply too much water in between it and the Chinese mainland, Taiwan itself hosting a considerable population, a large economy and a strong military. And since when has China been able to excert much influence on what’s going on in India? The thought of China somehow being able to make India break up seems ludicrous. Even in the case of Vietnam, we know that China bloodied its nose considerably when it mounted an invasion in the wake of Vietnam’s intervention in Cambodia back in the 70’s. Russia’s economy is not in tatters either, we know that it has returned to growth even despite the sanctions. Fundamentally, it is actually much more healthy than China’s since it is far less debt-driven and far less dependent on exports. There is, of course, no question that Russia is in a very precarious strategic situation viz a viz China no matter how the economy does, but China still depends on Russia just as Russia depends on China given the US hostility against both of them. Either one cannot stand its ground without the other. This fact seems to bother the author more than anything else, China despite its overwhelming economic and demographic advantage over Russia still being unable to face the US without this medium-sized power on its side. Yes, Russia is but a medium-sized power, no more no less, only with regard to nuclear weapons it is a super power, which is the reason why Russia and Christianity still exist. The article is also wrong with regard to the Syrian situation. The Russia contingent there is so small that it can be sustained practically indefinitely even given the size of Russia’s economy. The really astonishing fact is how Russia has been able to turn the tides in Syria so effectively, even in almost direct military confrontation with the US, with China standing by and essentially doing nothing. Chinese nationalists must find that hard to bear.
All of this analysis does not entail that China does not harbour a drive towards becoming a dominant world power, and that it is not willing to use the most sinister means to achieve this goal. It only entails that China has not come as far with that as Chinese nationalists would like to make themselves and others believe, and that it faces severe and fundamental obstacles on that path. It always has to be kept in mind that subversive divide and conquer strategies cur both ways, China can employ them against its adversaries just as they themselves can employ them against China.
Mr. Vladimir seems to be a nationalist from Russia. I’m glad that one of intended readers of my article read and responded to it even though you seemed to dismiss the threat of China with alacrity which might have reflected as something exaggerated or unsubstantiated in your judgement. Yes, the article I translated did have quite a few places that showed bravado, hidden frustrations and wishful thinking on the part of the Chinese nationalists. And you have made a valid and potent analysis demonstrating how difficult China will find to realize its vaulting ambitions and actually dominate other countries from India to Vietnam, let alone Russia in your opinion. I hope that is true.
However, my primary purpose of introducing that article written by a nationalist semiofficial Chinese scholar coupled with my own analysis is not to claim that every agenda plotted by China would be easily achieved by it overnight, but to demonstrate the vicious, dangerous and ruthless nature of today’s China and its determination to spare no means in order to realize its dream for global dominance and to bring the White western people to its collective knees in the process. By disclosing their own agendas in their own words, I intended to awaken, alarm and alert Whites of US and Russia and non-White nations from India to Japan and Vietnam alike to the harsh realities of the Chinese menace so that those nations and especially the nationalist members of the societies will start looking at the picture more seriously and urging to take rightful and necessary measures in response.
As a matter of fact, to be very frank with you, I happened to find that your last sentence, namely “It always has to be kept in mind that subversive divide and conquer strategies cur both ways, China can employ them against its adversaries just as they themselves can employ them against China” also sounds overly optimistic and constitutes, in your words, “wishful thinking”. The very pertinent fact of the West today about which I refer to US, Europe, Australia and Russia all together, is that while China is actively and vigorously employing the “subversive divide and conquer strategy” among other crafty means on its adversaries, those at the receiving end of the Chinese stratagems are actually not awakened enough to the scenario and certainly not repaying China with the same means, at least far inadequately. On the contrary, China has been consistently favored and shielded and subsidized by the Jew directed Western political and economic establishment on the both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. It would have been totally superfluous for me to introduce this Chinese article if the West already had had ample alertness and wariness about China, which unfortunately is not the case.
As to Russia, though it is understandable as perhaps an expedient necessity to cooperate with China and lean on each other’s weight considering the dire situation caused by a hostile Western elite class where Russia finds itself in, the amount of vigilance Russia ought to possess against China as one of her largest and lasting historical and geopolitical adversary apparently falls far short of adequate. For all the talks of mutual dependence of Russia and China at present and your self-reassured certainty of China not being a threat to Russia, Russia will underestimate China’s ruthlessness and duplicity and ignore China’s ingrained historical anti-Russia grievances and China’s overarching territorial ambitions and meticulous strategic plotting against Russia at her own peril.
Sometimes, even though your enemy does not have the power yet to harm you at the moment, as long as it does have the intention, you can hardly rest with ease and had better take every precaution against it. Just as a Chinese proverb goes: “fear not a thief stealing your things, fear a thief lurking and watching you without your awareness.” (不怕贼偷，怕贼惦记着)
Riki-Eiki, you write of “your [my] self-reassured certainty of China not being a threat to Russia” wheras I wrote “that Russia is in a very precarious strategic situation viz a viz China”. Yes, I am a Russia nationalist, but please don’t conclude from that that I am in the least bit naive about the fundamentals of the Russia/China relationship. Right now, however, Russia is clearly punching above its weight, which is good as long as it is sustainable, and China below its weight, which is good or bad depending on perspectives, I guess. As a case in point, it is of course very telling that Russia seems to have taken over China’s role even with regard to the North Korean crisis. China should have called for an end to the sanctions drive, it was Russia’s Putin who did it. Or is it rather the case that China is so much stronger that it can force Russia to do the dirty work for it? This thesis would call for a deeper investigation.
As for the Jews, yes, they have clearly welcomed, and are still welcoming, the China trade because it devestates the American middle class. Do the Jews have any deeper strategic considerations than that? The thesis would be that the Jews are nurturing an adversary to the US to drive them towards war against each other further down the road. Something like, it worked with WW I and WW II, so why should it not work with WW III? If the Jews have the capability to manage world affairs to such an extent, then why are they not going for the kill more directly? This question is one of the many I am asking myself when thinking about Jewish power. It’s clearly out greatest problem. Still, much more detailed investigation appears to be required before any serious conclusion about its character, reach and ultimate goals can be drawn.
Thanks for the kind reply and sound explanation. I admit my previous use of the word “certainty” in that particular sentence questioning your understanding is inappropriate or inaccurate. It’s too absolute and obviously a bad choice of word, judging from your evidently clear and balanced view on the issue. I felt glad and relieved that a Russian nationalist, one of my intended main reader groups, have seen and heeded my candid point of warning, and I appreciate your profound knowledge, insight, prescience and perspicacity on the Chinese Question and the issue of the menace posed by China which I felt highly necessary to cast light on and call attention to with real and discerning nationalists of the West.
Fantastic geopolitical analysis in this piece. Thanks Riki-Eiki Rei!
I am Chinese-American and I left China in my late twenties. I’d like to share some of my thought about China, its history, people and culture.
For the most part of her civilized history of about 3000 years, China was an agriculture country with centralized government. The Emperor has his army and a large bureaucratic system to govern the whole country. Peasants just need to work in the field , take care of his family and pay tax to the emperor. Local people don’t really collaborate with each other, villagers never need to fight together to defend themselves against raids outside. There were no local leaders, either spiritual or military. So there is no surprise that this country has no real religion, very weak national identity.
All the moral standards in China are quite ambiguous. Many Chinese can be nice and almost selfish to their family numbers and close friends; but they don’t really feel any guilt when they cheat a stranger, or even rob him, especially if the stranger is rich.
There is something in common between the typical Chinese and typical Jews: materialism. It was not an accident that the Chinese accepted Karl Marx’s communism so quickly. However, I feel that the average Jews have much bigger goal as they probably believe that they are God chosen people. The average Chinese have no faith, they only are interested in material gain and mundane ambition.
Since the Chinese don’t have their own religion and their national identity is weak, most Chinese immigrants to US assimilated relatively well. Especially their 2nd generation. However, I do believe that America should not take immigrants too many too fast, especially from very different cultures, if you want to keep the spiritual cohesion among the people.
As China the country, I don’t believe that China will ever conquer Asia or the world with military power. China had never tried to do that , even when she was the world super power. Because Chinese people have very weak national identity, they never willing to sacrifice and fight for the nation or for God. However, their economic invasion to US can further make US to lose its economical independence, and further moral decay.
I often wonder in which direction the historical Middle Kingdom China would have developed, if there had been no Opium War nor Communism. The China of Sven Hedin.
It is sad that China has developed in this direction. I have read old travel reports of a quite different China, one that was a High Culture in its own way.
But yes, I look with great concern how China is busy overtaking every little town and city in South Africa in the name of foreign assistance. The corrupt South African government does not care, they just have dollar signs in their eyes, for the black elite is always short of money. First the Boer had the Red Danger, then the Black Danger and now the Yellow Peril (what color is the Jewish Question) – how will they ever obtain freedom as a tiny minority under such adverse conditions?
Some main stream media reports (Google search string “China to invest in SA road infrastructure”)
Thank you so much for translating this article, Riki-Eiki. I’m sure it’ll help quite a few people here in Europe understand the fact that we are simply far too naive about politics in general, and about China in particular.
Say, could you please recommend a few good Japanese-language journals, books, papers, authors, podcasts or documentaries that deal with geopolitics, or generally with politics and east-Asian history?
Thank you, Visa, for your kind praise and appreciation of my humble work. I has always intended to speak about the most fresh, pertinent and unknown facts of today’s China and other related questions to the readership of White western nationalists to whom I have felt a consistent and congenial comradeship and a sincere and irrepressible desire to help and support based on my own conscience and conviction as a true National Socialist and White nationalism advocate. I am glad and grateful that my humble voice has found its audience and been received well. Thank you again.
As for your new question above, since I have left Japan and live outside for a while and my focus of work is focused on the mainland China and the overseas Chinese community, my knowledge about the latest facts and trends of the Japanese language media dealing with East Asian geopolitics and history may not be complete or up-to-date. I would like to offer some suggestions and recommend some items to you from my memory and based on my limited scope of knowledge and hope they would be helpful to you. I would be happy to add more later if they happen to surface in my mind or come to my attention.
And since you asked specifically for Japanese language items, I assume you have no problem reading Japanese fluently which is a real pleasure and delight. So there are some of my recommendations of relevant publications, all of right, conservative or nationalist nature, albeit with varying degrees, and mostly mainstream and steady while some being alternative and a bit eccentric and flamboyant. For all them, you can find by searching the names on google.co.jp and buy the books etc. on amazon.co.jp and other online outlets if you want.
(Note: I particularly recommend the No.15 and No.26 of the series of正論・別冊, and other issues are also good.)
Books and authors:
Contents of this part are simply too numerous to name one by one. I’d like to introduce some exemplary authors and you can simply look at their different books including titles, contents, readers’ comments and judge yourself if you like some of them by searching for them on amazon.co.jp. And because the overwhelming numbers of them in this category, I’ll also skip the elder generation of authors before the War and focus only on the modern ones active today as follows:
太田龍(Jewish question)、野口東秀(Chinese politics)、高坂哲郎(East Asian security)、佐伯啓思(political history and philosophy)、中川八洋(international geopolitics and security)、西尾幹二(East Asian politics and history)、宮崎正弘(China and international politics)、桜井誠(Japan nationalist and anti-immigration politics)、石平(naturalized Chinese scholar on Chinese politics)、ヘンリー・ストークスaka Henry Stokes (English journalist on Japanese history and culture)、呉善花(naturalized South Korean scholar on East Asian politics and history)、黄文雄(Taiwanese scholar on East Asian politics and history)、大高未貴(WWII East Asian history)、藤井厳喜(International geopolitics and Asian-Pacific security)、倉山満(East Asian history and politics)、馬淵睦夫(globalist order and geopolitics)、三橋貴明(globalist politics and economy)、加瀬英明(East Asian history and international politics)、渡部昇一(on Japanese and English history)、渡辺惣樹(on WWII history)、桜井よしこ(Japanese and international politics)、中野剛志(East Asian history and politics)、菅沼光弘(Japanese and East Asian geopolitics)、茂木弘道(WWII East Asian history and politics)、宮脇淳子(East Asian history)、平松茂雄(East Asian geopolitics and security)、河添恵子(political and East Asian affairs)、江崎道朗(WWII East Asian history)、田中英道、田中秀雄(Japanese and East Asian history)、藤岡信勝(WWII East Asian history and geopolitics)、別宮暖朗(WWII politics and history)、加藤康男(WWII Japanese and East Asian history)
(Note: the names with gothic letters are for emphasis, and the rest are also good.)
『APA真の近代史観受賞論文集』: Has published 8 columns so far of its great series of award-winning high quality paper compilations on East Asian history and politics, one of which contains a humble essay of mine own. http://www.apa.co.jp/book/book02
「史実を世界に発信する会」: An excellent revisionist historical website with fantastic and timely contents, in both English and Japanese versions. http://hassin.org/
「西尾幹二のインターネット日録」: the website of the versatile and profound scholar西尾幹二, with many great reflections on history and geopolitics concerning Japan, China, US and Europe.
「宮崎正弘の国際ニュース・早読み」: the free web-magazine of the highly active and prolific “Chinese question expert” and rightwing journalist 宮崎正弘, a former associate of Yukio Mishima, with many updated and insightful analysis. It can be freely subscribed at http://melma.com/backnumber_45206/
Visual & audio sources:
「チャンネル桜」: A Japanese private media company with its own radio and TV channels, purported to defend the honor and integrity of Japan and combat anti-Japanese historical and political propaganda of China, Korea and the West, featuring varied and colorful programs. It had shot a revisionist historical film called 「南京の真実」(The Truth about Nanking) several years ago. http://www.ch-sakura.jp/
Ah, thank you for all of these recommendations. The size of your list has certainly exceeded my expectations. A lack of Japanese-language reading material on political and historical matters surely will not be a problem of mine in the foreseeable future.
I actually used to be a regular listener of 三橋貴明’s weekly appearances on the radio show おはよう寺ちゃん 活動中, which are available on YouTube and ニコニコ動画. I did at times have difficulties understanding some of the vocabulary relating to politics and economics, which is in part because most of the non-fiction I’ve read in the language so far was on topics pertaining to either IT and mathematics or to cooking, and in part because I’ve actually focused a lot more on learning the writing system than on the spoken language. But I’m sure that after a month or two of immersing myself in some of the materials you have recommended, this won’t be an issue at all anymore.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment