Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 125 
Interview with Richard Edmonds

10 comments

1. rhondda says:

   April 30, 2015 at 7:35 pm

   Very interesting. I never understood why Canadians died in either war and just how Hitler threatened Canada. It is good to know that some British people also felt their men died in vain. Of course I dared not express these opinions, as a child. Having friends whose relatives either died in the war or were wounded and disabled for the rest of their lives, it did not seem to be prudent to voice this, as in today’s parlance it would be a trigger to emotional abuse. But every remembrance day, I would wonder.

   1. Leon says:

      May 1, 2015 at 12:25 pm

      Canadians died to protect the Empire. Or so they were told.
2. katana says:

   May 2, 2015 at 8:13 am

   This was a very good interview.

   Richard Edmonds spoke eloquently and rounded it out with a veiled yet clear identification of the true enemy of Whites, that, no doubt jew to “racial hate” laws in Britain, he felt the need to be circumspect in actually naming them.

   It was gratifying to hear Richard state that he is fully convinced that the so-called “Holocaust” is an exercise in propaganda. For those of us that haven’t “stepped over the ‘Holocaust'” and have done the research, this conclusion is obvious, yet rare for it to be pronounced. For fear of the jews, as they say.

   In the last 5 minutes of the interview Richard’s world view on British politics comes into focus with a final summation with him declaring: “I would like to accuse the British Establishment with being liars and murderers!” So true.

   Liars, murderers and traitors continue to lead us under jewish domination throughout the West.

   Greg Johnson, I have to say, did a commendable job as an interviewer by remaining in background and allowing Edmonds to take center stage. The people over at Majority Rights need to take heed.

   1. Verlis says:

      May 2, 2015 at 8:16 pm

      The people over at Majority Rights need to take heed.

      Counter Currents is so vastly superior to MR in every possible way that the two should never be mentioned in the same breath, not for any reason.
   2. Hail says:

      May 4, 2015 at 2:10 am

      Katana wrote:
      [Richard Edmonds] is fully convinced that the so-called “Holocaust” is an exercise in propaganda. For those of us that haven’t “stepped over the ‘Holocaust’” and have done the research, this conclusion is obvious, yet rare for it to be pronounced.

      Yes.

      Richard Edmonds said, at the end of the interview, that unraveling the false narrative of the Holocaust is a precondition for European salvation. I think Dr. Johnson’s position on it is that pressing on the Holocaust issue is unproductive.

      Fair enough, but the Revisionist case really does win a knockout victory. Richard Edmonds was as confident about this as he should be. Those who just read the serious Revisionist scholarship with an open mind will see this. That knowledge in hand, what to do with it is another question. Talking endlessly about the Holocaust does bog down and get boring.

      A side point, here, that I think is useful to consider: The main figures behind Holocaust Revisionist scholarship are generally libertarian by temperament, not “far right”. Bradley Smith is a libertarian. Dr. Faurisson is more-or-less left-wing politically. Leuchter was totally apolitical. David Cole. Ernst Zundel was a pacifist and libertarian. Dean Irebodd, the San Francisco academic who, in the mid-2000s, released the “One Third of the Holocaust” video series is a left-wing-libertarian. The prolific Revisionist Carlo Mattogno of Italy is purely an academic and not political.

      Then there is the amazing Paul Rassinier (another Frenchman), the father of Revisionism. He was a Communist and former political prisoner in a German camp. After the war, he saw the still-lingering war propaganda and widespread misconceptions about the camps, absurd stories still repeated about camps he’d been in himself, so he wrote a few small “Revisionist” books in the late 1940s, 1950s, and early 1960s. Rassinier died before 1970, and couldn’t have realized that they’d weave together a capital-H Holocaust narrative in the 1970s and that it would become the main pillar of Western civic religion by our time!

      1. Greg Johnson says:

         May 4, 2015 at 8:37 am

         Based on my understanding of the most recent thinking of David Cole, Mark Weber, and David Irving, I think that millions of Jews were exterminated by the Germans and their allies simply because they were Jews, and that gassing was at least tried as a method of extermination. The revisionist project has changed some important details of this story. But in the end, there was “Holocaust enough” for Jewish political and propaganda purposes.

         1. WWWM says:

            May 10, 2015 at 9:07 am

            Was there a planned extermination program, conceived and ordered by the German government? That is the Holocaust allegation.

            What experimental gassing took place? What chemical was used in these gas chambers? Only the United States, to my knowledge, has been able to successfully use gas chambers as an execution method.

            This interview ended on a very good note. No way out but through the Holocaust story, it appears.
3. Ethan Allen III says:

   May 2, 2015 at 2:51 pm

   Excellent conversation, Greg–and very encouraging. False Despair is now the greatest enemy of our People and our Cause.

   The Chicago Tribune publisher whose name escaped Mr. Edmonds was Colonel Robert McCormick–a leading America First populist.
4. Greg Johnson says:

   May 7, 2015 at 10:58 am

   Richard is currently standing for Parliament as a National Front candidate. The rich and powerful are not amused:

   http://www.swlondoner.co.uk/carshalton-and-wallington-national-front-candidate-and-holocaust-questioners-views-branded-despicable/
5. Highland says:

   May 25, 2015 at 1:33 pm

   Awesome!

Comments are closed.