54 words / 1:58:49
Greg Johnson welcomed Brandon Martinez to Counter-Currents Radio to discuss the Realpolitik of the Venezuela strike, reactions on the Right, international law, and audience questions, including on the resurrection of Denis Kapustin. You can now download or listen to the episode here.
To listen in a player, click here or below. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
10 comments
You don’t overthrow a regime by merely removing the top leader. That’s simply not enough because the entire system is still intact and functioning.
Ukraine had the second most powerful military in Europe — after Russia — when Putin invaded. And NATO has been backing it ever since. It wasn’t a failed state like Venezuela.
And thinking that Russia will pull out of Ukraine is completely delusional.
Surely not voluntarily. Thus they must be forced out.
Ukraine is existential for the Russians. It could lead to nuclear war.
That’s a retarded Russian talking point. Russia won’t be “better off dead” than to leave Ukraine alone. The only thing that an independent Ukraine threatens is Russian imperialism, which deserves to die.
A law, including an international law, is a norm, but norms, just by being norms, are not right. A norm in itself is a claim of right but not an actual right.
Norms in themselves may not be right. They may be malformed, inadequately thought-through, or overly vague. They may be wrong, based on wrong facts or wrong moral intuitions. They may be bad. They may be designed to produce consequences that we should disapprove of, and in that sense norms may even be malevolent.
Norms based on gender theory are insane, because they are based on hostility to the biological realities of sex, which is reduced to mere convention. Norms based on feminism are bad, because feminism is anti-male (and it was from the beginning). Antiwhite norms are radically bad too. Such norms are not right merely because people put them in books of law or international law, and force our race to live under them or gradually die under them.
We should be wary of systems of morals, laws, and norms when perverse enemies of our race are packing the institutions, including international institutions, and pushing our race towards a policy-driven extinction. It makes more sense to look at things on a case by case basis, always with a view to the survival of our race and not with an attitude that legal consistency is the best thing ever.
We have nothing to gain from “might makes right” bluster but we also have nothing to gain from putting a priority on being self-sacrificing and diligent rule-followers in a system where the rules assume that our race has no particular right to exist.
Your anecdote about what Russians living in Ukraine told you was interesting . Thank you.
This stream clarified so much, thanks for recording it.
Eric Zemmour
From Laurent Guyenot’s article Jews Against Rome Forever, “In France the most public defender of the Carholic faith is Eric Zemmour, a Jew who hangs out with the most despicable anti-Christian Zionists after debating them on TV. Are French Catholics being fooled by this charade? Yes, completely.”
Sometimes those less indoctrinated can sniff out a rat better than the religiously indoctrinated. Hence nominal Catholics vote accordingly for Le Pen and rightfully reject Zemmour by how he acts rather than what he says.
Sheesh, someone has developed a bad case of stockholm syndrome…
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.