When James Edwards asked me to speak at The Political Cesspool’s 20th Anniversary Conference in South Carolina earlier this year, I accepted on the spot and cleared my schedule. I knew that it would be a fantastic event. I knew that the finest people that I have met in the movement would be there.
I’ve been critical of the movement, but it has always been from the perspective of love and as an insider. I have been a card-carrying member of the Council of Conservative Citizens and League of the South. I have been to dozens of conferences over the course of the past 15 years. I marched into Charlottesville. I’ve been around since the White Nationalism 1.0 days. I saw the rise and fall of the Alt Right. I’m as deeply involved as ever in whatever we are calling ourselves these days. I’m so deeply involved in the movement that my sons are Gordon Baum’s grandsons. I have watched children grow up and old war horses be buried. I count the leaders of the movement as my closest associates.
The truth is that the leaders of our movement — most of them, anyway — are all smart, solid, productive, interesting, wonderful people like James Edwards. It is always a pleasure to be in the same room with them. I can’t speak highly enough of the core of the movement, where most people have known each other in real life for decades. You encounter so many cranks and morons online. It is the fine people who I know offline who keep my spirits up. It is essential to develop and nurture these relationships.
The dissident Right is like the Palace of Versailles. There are so many wings of it which are adjacent to the main building. There are innumerable rooms and gardens where the various subcultures are each doing their own thing. We cross paths with each other. Sometimes we get into arguments over the various points of division. People travel from room to room. James Edwards is a unifying figure who is known and liked by nearly everyone. The Political Cesspool conference is a place where White Nationalists, white advocates, Alt Right people, unreconstructed National Socialists, paleocons, populists, patriots, Southern nationalists, Southern heritage activists, and so on can all feel at ease and have a good time.
When I walked through the door of our hotel, I felt rich, fulfilled, and among friends. It was emotional. It wasn’t just the 20-year anniversary of The Political Cesspool. It felt like passing a milestone in my life as well. I have been active for roughly the same amount of time. I have spent my entire young adult life in this scene. I am entering middle age now. I have a wife and two kids. I knew I would be seeing a lot of old friends. I knew that I would be meeting people who I know from the Internet, but who I haven’t had the pleasure to meet yet in real life. I knew there would be people there who were at my wedding and who are like family to me. I knew there would be other bright people there who I hadn’t met yet. I knew there would be people there who I haven’t seen in years or who I saw in the blur of Charlottesville.
The 20-year anniversary of The Political Cesspool got me thinking about our ideological journey — not just about political shifts in the culture which I could measure in numbers in my speech, but in the origins and the trials and triumphs that we have all experienced. I thought about my most memorable experiences. I thought about my regrets and mistakes, which are numerous. I thought about all the things for which I was grateful. I thought about the areas in which we were successful and the challenges ahead of us. I thought about all the stories that I have, a few of which I enjoyed talking about over whiskey.
The title of my speech was “Paleoconservatism: From the Margins to the Mainstream.” It was about how critiques of conservative orthodoxy from men like Pat Buchanan, Sam Francis, and Peter Brimelow in the 1990s and early 2000s have resonated and seem to be gaining a larger audience on the Right. Identity issues have become more salient and now animate the Republican coalition. We live in a time when Joe Six Pack is radicalized enough to storm the Capitol, but also one in which the Republican House has held nearly 30 votes in two months on Israel and “fighting anti-Semitism” on Ivy League campuses.
Warren Balogh of Modern Politics and formerly the National Justice Party circled back to Pat Buchanan’s run on the Reform Party ticket in 2000 in which he defeated Donald Trump. Warren and James Edwards started out in politics in the Buchanan Brigades. I had no idea what Warren was going to speak about, but he also traced our cause back to those crucial years and was able to describe it in greater detail in terms of his first-hand personal experience. Paleoconservatism looked finished in the early 2000s. The George W. Bush administration is where history began to bend back in our direction.
Tim Murdock of White Rabbit Radio described his experiences working with Bob Whitaker and their role in injecting the term “anti-white” into the discourse. Bob Whitaker was always trying to use new technology to impose terminology and thus ideology on spaces outside the White Nationalist echo chamber. I will never forget the interview that I did with Tim on White Rabbit Radio in January 2022 which I called “The Tipping Point.” I had spent the first year of the Biden administration tracking the mass radicalization of conservatives across multiple polls. It was clear to me that something huge was happening in the wake of Trump’s defeat in the 2020 election, but the significance of this wasn’t registering in the wider movement. Tim is one of the few activists who thinks like I do. I define success as our ideas, values, criticisms, and concepts permeating the Right. Thus, I saw it as a watershed moment when the “anti-white” genie was let out of the bottle by Tucker Carlson, even if it was being used in boilerplate conservative rhetoric. Whites were given permission to think racially. We anticipated even greater triumphs in the years ahead, such as the mainstreaming of the Jewish Question. All of this has come to pass in less than two years.
Nick Griffin of the British National Party addressed the conference via video. He was scheduled to attend and had booked his flight and hotel room, but was denied entry into the United States. He spoke about how the political window to turn things around through democratic means had closed in Britain. Much like the Republican Party in the United States, the Tories have spent the last 25 years successfully absorbing, containing, redirecting, and dissipating the energies of the Right. As in the United States, mass immigration has reached an all-time high in Britain under Conservative rule, which guarantees a majority-minority Britain by mid-century which will one day resemble Syria or Lebanon. In spite of this bitter defeat, Nick remains optimistic. He spoke at length about the collapse of the post-Second World War liberal world order and how it is happening militarily in Ukraine, economically through de-dollarization, culturally through extreme polarization, and morally through the end of the Holocaust card thanks to Gaza. Historically, we are at the end of an epoch which has been defined by Germany’s defeat in the Second World War.
Mark Weber of the Institute of Historical Review and Jared Taylor of American Renaissance were our next two speakers, and both spoke about how America deserves to fall at this point. Uncle Jared told us that the America which fought the War Between the States was gone. Similarly, the nation which had reconciled and moved beyond sectionalism to become a Great Power in the twentieth century was gone, too. We now live in a country which prefers to demonize its founding stock and deconstruct its culture. We live in a country which renames schools and topples men like Robert E. Lee from pillars. It is not our country anymore. We occupy the same geographical space with hostile aliens, including those who are related to us. It doesn’t matter who wins the next election, because it is too late to “Take Back America.” Instead, we should be thinking about how to salvage a part of it through migration and secession.
Sam Dickson spoke at length about how the media shapes the news cycle through selectivity and repetition to fit its preferred narrative. We have all heard the names of George Floyd, Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, Emmett Till, and so on. No one remembers the names of white victims of even the most gruesome crimes, like Daniel Williams, who was recently raped to death by black inmates in an Alabama prison. I personally remembered that horrific story, which happened here, near Montgomery, but not the name. It didn’t stick with me because I haven’t heard it repeated a thousand times. Lies which are repeated a hundred times, like the notion that our current system is based on “white supremacy,” are earnestly believed by millions of people. The American education system is also based on lies like this. We recently celebrated the 70th anniversary of the Brown decision, which failed to erase academic racial gaps.
LISTEN HERE:
We closed out the evening with a live three-hour broadcast of The Political Cesspool. I was interviewed along with the other speakers and many of the attendees. Jaye Ryan was interviewed. Unfortunately, I missed Dr. Michael Hill’s speech on Sunday, which closed out the conference. I was done in by a familiar foe: exhaustion from traveling, and staying up too late drinking and socializing with friends over the previous two evenings. We also brought the baby, who wanted to sleep in.
The conference was well done. Hats off to James for throwing such a great event. By the time of the 30-year anniversary, we need to shoot for being so mainstream and normalized that such an event could be open to the public, and even our enemies wouldn’t see the point of trying to shut us down. Those tactics aren’t working at a time when tens of thousands of people are participating in Twitter Spaces.
Note: I would like to give a shout out to my new friends at Antelope Hill Publishing. Thanks for the coffee! Check them out!
This report was published by permission of the author from Occidental Dissent.
The%20Political%20Cesspool%0A20th%20Anniversary%20Conference%0A
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
Related
-
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 613
-
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 612
-
The Case for Trump 2024: Anti-Zionism vs. Preserving The First Amendment
-
The Case for Trump 2024: The Left Is Still The Enemy
-
The New Nationalism Returns
-
Interview with Ruuben Kaalep: James Edwards
-
Whoever Runs Culture Always Ends Up Dominating the State
-
Racial Thought in Irish Nationalism
38 comments
I much enjoyed reading about this successful conference that brought so many of our spokesmen and groups together.
Hunter Wallace a/k/a Brad Griffin represents the greater big tent “movement” and the recent gathering of its leaders well with this piece. My wife and I had dinner with one of the attendees a couple of days after Political Cesspool’s 20th anniversary celebration and heard a similar upbeat report. One thing he told us was how likeable and what a unifier James Edwards is: “He’s been in business for 20 years and has managed to piss off no one.” James is perfect for that job and I’m told he is moving on to a higher position than radio personality.
No one will be saying that about me. A reason for that is that the National Alliance and Cosmotheism that I represent and promote are the alternative the greater big tent movement. We hold the necessary, uncompromising hard line rather than try to be popular. We don’t “shoot to be mainstream and normal,” as Hunter apparently sets as a goal.
We’re not for everybody, only for a minority of a minority that understand and agree with the program and ideology in Founder William Pierce’s Alliance, primarily strict geographical separation of the best of our race from other races and the “mainstream,” and rejection of the Semitic belief system — Christianity — that so many in the mainstream, and, unfortunately, also in the greater big tent movement either, still embrace or refuse to address. Holding that hard line tends to make one unpopular with the mainstream rather than appeal to it.
So, anyway, enjoy our American Dissident Voices broadcast of this morning, “Memorial Day: What Is Worth Fighting For” at nationalvanguard.org.
[W]e need a racial movement and a racial community which is as explicit in its principles as the Founding Fathers should have been in our Constitution, with its members and leaders sharing a deep and scientific understanding of the issues we face as a people. This racial community will be the vanguard which leads our people to freedom and self-determination. This racial community, of which the National Alliance represents the bare beginning, could operate political parties, or alternatively provide the seedbed from which the leaders of those parties are selected, but neither the political parties — nor any mass outreach program — should be ends in themselves.
The hyperlink the vanguard which leads takes the reader to one of our cause’s most forward-looking writers, Andrew Hamilton, and his 2011 article “Types of Courage” at counter-currents.com.
Vanguards are fine, but at some point they have to attain actual power – and that means moving the mainstream closer to their position.
The National Alliance will always remain a tiny ideological sect because the vast majority of whites are either seculars, who trend Left/egalitarian (why that should be so I have no idea), or Christians, and despite Pierce’s brilliance, his agenda is seen as morally repugnant by both groups – and I doubt that will ever change. Those who believed as Pierce did were mostly dead by 1945.
For those who care only about preventing white extinction, as I do, and not at all about cosmotheism or other racial irrelevancies, the road to our racial salvation runs through Christianity. White preservationists (WP) must demonstrate, in a theologically sophisticated way, the moral compatibility between the Faith and the measures necessary to secure our racial existence. Non-WP white Christians are the best targets for conversion to race realism and WP, as this group is increasingly conservative across the board (this is due, however, less to ideological improvements among Christians, than to politically progressive Christians increasingly leaving the Church and Faith altogether).
Lord Shang: May 26, 2024 Vanguards are fine, but at some point they have to attain actual power – and that means moving the mainstream closer to their position.
The National Alliance will always remain a tiny ideological sect because the vast majority of whites [sic] are either seculars, who trend Left/egalitarian (why that should be so I have no idea), or Christians, and despite Pierce’s brilliance, his agenda is seen as morally repugnant by both groups – and I doubt that will ever change. Those who believed as Pierce did were mostly dead by 1945.
For those who care only about preventing white [sic] extinction, as I do, and not at all about cosmotheism or other racial irrelevancies, the road to our racial salvation runs through Christianity…
—
Ugh! I was born in 1947, Lord, and many new Cosmotheists or Alliance members who follow Pierce’s teachings were born in this century, so what will you and your Christians do about them?
Far be it from me to argue vanguardism with you, Lord. I can just say from what you’ve written here that for all your worth you are not Alliance material.
You, sir, are in the mainstream that finds the brilliance of Pierce morally repugnant. You see NA not as a vanguard, a core group that holds a new consciousness for change for our race, but as simply an insignificant, “tiny ideological sect” that can get nowhere because it does not appeal to the herd that stills either hangs on to <gasp!> Jewish Christianity or <double gasp!!> “Left/egalitarianism” — also Jewish — or both.
Pierce launched NA and Cosmotheism 50 years ago as vanguards in the sense that they are the forefront of a movement for White renewal decades before the term was co-opted in 1995 by © The Vanguard Group, Inc., that ranks right up there with the powerful anti-White, Jew-run BlackRock behemoth.
NationalVanguard.org picked up Jonathan Bowden’s excellent essay “Vanguardism: Hope for the Future” from counter-currents.com. Allow me to quote the inimitable Mr. Bowden:
There are more of us than ever before, but it’s always a question of quality as against quantity in this life, because what I am going to propose is that instead of looking at demographic and quantity-based analyses, quantitative ways of looking at things, let’s look at qualitative ways of looking at things. Let’s look at quality. Let’s look at elitism. Let’s look at the fact that all groups need a vanguard…
All people who have a vanguard, an elitist mentality, are regarded as partly mad by their own groups, because the majority of people do not want to know. The majority of people wish to live their own life in their own way, and they only look at these broader questions when life impinges upon them and comes upon them, and the hand of life grasps them by the collar and they really cannot do any other thing but notice what is in front of them…
Many of the reasons our people do not seem to have a sense of solidarity amongst themselves in relation to the degree that some other groups could be said to have is because a significant number of them have never been kicked, have never felt what it is as a group to be disprivileged in a society. Unfortunately, in certain areas of British and continental life now and North American life that process for some, and certainly not at the top or middle of the society, is beginning. They’re beginning to realize what it is like to be a minority or what it is like to be culturally disprivileged or what it is like to be dispossessed in a way…
That spirit will grow, but it will only feed into consciousness in a number of select minds, because the bulk of people are not drawn to be in a vanguard formulation. People will only listen to a vanguard when they are desperate. They will only listen to a vanguard when they think there is no other hope.
Make no bones about it, what vanguard Caucasians think about their future is watched and is listened to by liberals and by all the other groups [including Christians]. So, the idea that what we do and what we say and what we think has no relevance or no purport is not true.
Indeed, it would be no exaggeration to say that Christianity is the antecedent of all egalitarian ideologies. More specifically, the Christian doctrine of soul equality; the innate value and intrinsic worth of all who bear a human (or semi-human) countenance. The neo-Christian is the unwary pseudo-apostate who has rejected the institutional Christianity of his forebears, and thinks himself enlightened for doing so, yet in his breast still beats the heart of a Christian soldier. By transmuting ‘all are equal before god’ to ‘all are equal before the law’, he remains axiologically a Christian. His subconscious assumption, that everyone is equal in moral worth and potential, is non-negotiable. His faith in equality is unshakeable, for he is a true believer. It is axiomatic for him, and he will never permit open discussion. And so, by silencing all dissenting testimony, he creates the illusion that no evidence contradicting his faith exists. Without this censorship, his defeat would be inevitable. Having delayed said defeat indefinitely, the lies he tells in place of the truth are free to flourish unopposed. As years become decades and decades become centuries, these falsehoods fossilize into facts, and the truth is lost to time.
Healthy human behaviours, like ethnocentrism and aversion to abnormal things like homosexuality and the transgender cult, have been pathologised as “racism” and “phobia” by Christian ethics and the atheist liberals (secular creationists) who, though they disavow institutional Christianity, are still running the Christian software that Western man has internalised over the past two millennia. It has been entrenched in Western culture for so long that many people regard egalitarian values and human rights as self-evident truths. Over the course of 2000 years, it became axiomatic in the Western mind. Nietzsche was the first to make the connection and denounce Christian slave morality as the original psych-op, but many conservatives and reactionaries who oppose wokeness still don’t understand that Christianity is where the egalitarian poison comes from. It has always been a Trojan horse for introducing Levantine malware into the European mind. It inverted the values of classical civilization, which would have been an immense task in a time before mass communication. The Nazi attempt to extract this tumour at a pre-terminal stage was systematically sabotaged. Now it is metastasizing, entering its “red hypergiant” phase. Unless we successfully extract the Christian cancer in its entirety, we will never traverse the psychological Rubicon.
Christianity is the nemesis of the hereditarian, eugenic, meritocratic Right, because soul equality is antithetical to evolution, a merciless process of elimination. Because evolution is synonymous with life itself, Darwinian explanations for our behaviour are indeed the primary explanations. It should never be forgotten that life is nothing more than a ruthless gladiatorial tournament of genes. The Nazis were the repudiation of Christian ethics and the revaluation of all values that Nietzsche prophesied. Some people wonder why, despite having a considerably higher death toll, communism is not reviled like Nazism. The reason is because communism is not a departure from Christian axiology; it deifies the lower classes and demonises the strong. “The last shall be first, and the first shall be last.” It is Darwinism in reverse.
In the current year, the airwaves are clogged with the lukewarm rhetoric of pseudo-apostates. The assortment of classical liberals, conservatives, reactionaries and traditionalists who have appointed themselves our cultural vanguards are all neo-Christians. Consider that the Nazis were explicitly opposed to egalitarianism, communism, international finance, usury, fiat currency, immigration, multiculturalism, multiracialism, miscegenation and sexual perversion, while the powers that be explicitly advocate all of these things. The dichotomy couldn’t be simpler, yet our neo-Christian vanguards, who cannot bear to admit that wokeness is an inevitable consequence of Germany losing the war, continue to parrot the oxymoronic drivel that our (disproportionately Jewish) elites are fascists. In a pathetic attempt to deflect the Left’s moral indictments back at them, they affirm and uphold the egalitarian value system. “The Left are the real racists! The Left are the real fascists! The Left are the real Nazis!”
Racism, sexism, homophobia and transphobia are moral indictments based in Christian ethics (soul equality), which has no bearing on our brutal Darwinian reality. Nature has no obligation to be pleasant. Humans are animals, men and women are evolutionarily divergent, and ethnocentrism is adaptive and healthy. Egalitarian ideology has pathologised these things, as it pathologises everything normal, because the Left is a consortium of defectives. Individuals with high mutational load. Junk DNA, or what we now call “spiteful mutants.” If germs and parasites were sentient, I imagine they would express anger at being identified for what they are and purged by the host’s immune system. Similarly, the woke mob are angry when they are identified as a threat by healthy, sane people. It is unsurprising, then, that a disease vector would think itself harmless and assert that the true pathology is our healthy immune response against it. Spandrell’s bioleninism thesis is the best analysis out there. In short, the egalitarian Left is quantity and the hereditarian Right is quality.
Wokeness is Marxism with a shift in focus from economics (as conventionally understood) to culture, race, and sex. While ostensibly concerned with the welfare of the working class, that is merely a superficial garnish. In genetic terms, Marxism is the revolt of spiteful mutants against civilization. The Left is a coalition of genetic refuse, as Professor Edward Dutton has emphasised repeatedly. It always has been, but it is more obvious now than ever before. The Nazis were an immune response to the unparalleled degeneracy and debauchery of the Weimar era, which bears an astonishing similarity to the current woke insanity. Indeed, the woke mutants today revere disgusting perverts like Hirschfeld. It is the same pathology, with the same nefarious group of people behind it, and if we could only abandon Christian ethics, we could finally annihilate it once and for all. Perhaps now the gears will start to turn in normie brains. Maybe they will start to understand why the Germans forcibly removed these irritants. They are hostile organisms, and if the obstacle of Christian ethics were removed, our immune system would flush them out like the bacillus they are.
Alas, the triumph of Christianity in the West has been so complete that there are none left who truly stand outside it. All of the supposed revolutions against Christianity have merely been re-interpretations of Christian ideas. How could we tell the genuine dissident, should he ever materialise, from the charlatan? A true apostate would dare to say the unthinkable. He would say that we have no moral obligation to any people other than our own, our only duty is to eradicate obsolete hominids, and that doing so should stir no more emotion in us than swatting a fly. Anyone who has a problem with this has not transvalued Christian ethics (soul equality). We must reject such notions as the brotherhood of man and the fraternity of all peoples. We must abandon universalism and embrace particularism.
Christianity’s Criminal History by Carlheinz Deschner, The Darkening Age by Catherine Nixey, Dominion by Tom Holland, The Jesus Hoax by David Skrbina, and On the Historicity of Jesus by Richard Carrier are invaluable resources. César Tort, a self-described exterminationist, is the foremost authority on the Christian psych-op. Two seminal texts, Judea vs Rome and Why The White Man Must Abandon Christianity by Ferdinand Bardamu, are available on his site. My own essay, On the Aetiology of Wokeness, is now nearing completion. If all of this literature, combined with the collective scholarship of Kevin MacDonald, Andrew Joyce, Thomas Dalton, Edmund Connolly, Brenton Sanderson, Tobias Langdon and Thomas Goodrich were ever to become public knowledge, it would be the sociopolitical equivalent of Krakatoa.
This Christian “egalitarianism” (really quasi-egalitarianism) was introduced to the European mind before Christianity itself was. I noticed that you recommended Tom Holland’s Dominion near the end of your comment, but if you read Chapter 1 of that book, you would be aware that the Stoics had already introduced the ideas of a universal humanity before the Christians did, and that this philosophy was already endorsed by the young Roman Empire. What the Christians did was elaborate on this idea, much like how the Neo-Christians of later centuries elaborated and expanded upon the Christian idea.
Yet the Christians, before modernity at least, did not see the world in an “egalitarian” sense. They, much like Stoic Pagan Rome, saw no contradiction between the things universal to all humans and the distinctions in race and class between particular humans. Nobody before modernity saw “racism,” “sexism,” or (especially not) “homophobia and transphobia” as “moral indictments.” Even though miscegenation happened in both Christian and Pagan civilizations, it was lamented by the educated men of both civilizations as a sign of decline (there are numerous early Imperial Roman writers lamenting Asiatic influence in their own day).
Unless we successfully extract the Christian cancer in its entirety, we will never traverse the psychological Rubicon… Alas, the triumph of Christianity in the West has been so complete that there are none left who truly stand outside it…
—
It’s not enough to clear the ground of the Jewish brain bomb without replacing it with something more suitable for Aryans. William Pierce did that for his people with Cosmotheism — the Nature-based, reality-grounded alternative to the much larger anti-Nature, unreal Christian patriot cause.
You cannot say with a straight face that Pierce did not stand outside of Christianity as a suitable belief system for Whites. Even César Tort, who you say is the foremost authority on the Christian psych-op, agrees for the most part with Pierce.
Maybe Spandrell’s bioleninism is a more suitable movement that can prevail over Christianity and our Jewish masters to preserve our race? Make the case for that, and if you can convince me that it is, I will cease promoting Pierce’s teachings, his Cosmotheism and the National Alliance and become a Bioleninist.
Where does one apply?
Many on our side, like C-C’s own influential Lord Shang, deny Pierce’s brilliance, saying cosmotheism is irrelevant and that “the road to our racial salvation runs through Christianity.”
I say a serious critical comparison of the two creeds is in order.
Pierce stood outside of it, but few else did. The smartest, most honest people are always the least influential. César Tort would be more popular if he weren’t so abrasive and quit trying to tie every negative thing in life to his parents. It’s pathetic, the amount of time he spends whining about it. Not everyone had your parents, Señor Tortilla. His obsession with Wagner and classical antiquity is also very tiresome. I certainly wouldn’t have wanted to live back then, when people wiped their backsides with a rag on a stick, and shared said stick between them. And the women, holy hell. Talk about a bad case of man-face.
In my experience, bloggers are a touchy, egotistical bunch. They are all little kings in their respective castles, and they relish the power. I got banned from one today. Puffed out his chest, gave it the whole this-is-my-house-and-I-make-the-rules shtick. With regard to Christ being a work of malevolent fiction, this guy dismissed my sources on the grounds that all “reputable” scholars disagree with me. In my reply, which he wouldn’t allow, I asked how is that any different from the “reputable” scientis who dismiss the biological reality of race, affirm man-made climate change and endorse transgenderism. Thus is why it’s a mistake to trust the peer-review process, which is merely gate-keeping by another name. In an ideologically compromised society, it will become a tool to enforce the ideological consensus.
He pointed out that some of those who defend the historical Jesus are themselves agnostic, to which I replied that the neo-Christian is often more fanatical than the conventional Christian. In truth, there was a surfeit of Jesuses, all of them mortal men of the lowest order. But whether the historical Jesus actually existed becomes irrelevant when we consider that a) he was certainly not the son of god, because god is fictional, and b) his message was evolutionarily toxic, both for the Romans and for the white man today. On two counts, then, the abandonment of Christian ethics is necessitated. By loving his enemies unconditionally, the white man today emulates St Francis; he is embracing and kissing the leper.
Pedantic semantics aside, the bottom line is very simple. We lose nothing by abandoning Christianity, and we (potentially) gain everything. Alas, my foregone victory was denied and I was unceremoniously evicted. It’s the most aggravating thing in the world when you have so many crucial things to say but some nagging irritant is holding you back. Often this irritant takes the form of an ideological enemy who has attained a position of administrative authority and can silence you on a whim.
I should also issue a correction, as you seem to be confused about the term. Bioleninism is an evo-psych theory of wokeness, but when I say a bioleninist, I am not referring to someone who advocates the theory. I am referring to a woke individual.
I’m a news junkie and I’d never heard of the Daniel Williams case. Good God in Heaven, what a nightmare.
https://abc3340.com/news/local/suspect-in-murder-and-rape-of-22-year-old-inmate-had-history-of-sexual-violence-according-to-adoc-documents
Autisticus Spasticus: May 27, 2024 Pierce stood outside of it, but few else did. The smartest, most honest people are always the least influential. César Tort would be more popular if he weren’t so abrasive and quit trying to tie every negative thing in life to his parents. It’s pathetic, the amount of time he spends whining…
—
I never knew that, being familiar with Tort only because he had briefly praised William Pierce. He might have become more popular with smart people had he not been such an irredeemable fool for Tubby Tubbington and his NorthWest Front scam. That alone showed he was neither smart nor honest, thus not influential where it counts.
If Pierce was not influential why did SPLC Jews spend so much time and money bent on destroying his NA and why did ADL Jews say that he was “the most dangerous man in America”?
—
[B]loggers are a touchy, egotistical bunch. They are all little kings in their respective castles, and they relish the power. I got banned from one today.
—
You’re too intelligent to waste your time with bloggers, especially ones who would censor or ban you. Stay away from them and find a group that you can agree with and support
—
Bioleninism is an evo-psych theory of [Political Correctness],.. [W]hen I say a bioleninist, I am referring to a [PC] individual.
—
I prefer plain talk and cringe when I see White people using the “w”-word. Fact is it’s an anti-White Ebonic term coined by Blacks in the 1940s to simply mean PC. We all knew what PC meant until demi-Jew funnyman Bill Mahr butchered the term Politically Incorrect.
I agree that Pierce was extremely intelligent, and quite influential on the Right. I have a friend who for years used to wake up at a certain time on Saturdays just to listen to Pierce’s radio broadcasts (one might describe Pierce as an outstanding “early podcaster”). But the scale of his potential influence was always very limited. By the time enough whites come around to his outlook, our race will have been reduced to utter impotence by sheer dearth of numbers. We have to strategize based on external conditions now, “meeting people where they are”, not where we wish they were, while there remains time enough to prevent our enslavement and extinction.
You need to study men like James Burnham, Sam Francis, Garet Garrett, Gramsci, and the Frankfurt School Jews to understand how to enact “revolutions within the forms” – how to subvert and conquer existing institutions (like, eg, the GOP), rather than trying to defeat and replace them wholly from the outside (a la Pierce).
“Tubby Tubbington” – not sure why, but that made me chuckle.
Lord Shang: May 28, 2024 I agree that Pierce was extremely intelligent, and quite influential on the Right. I have a friend who for years used to wake up at a certain time on Saturdays just to listen to Pierce’s radio broadcasts (one might describe Pierce as an outstanding “early podcaster”)…
—
American Distant Voices is a carefully scripted weekly radio broadcast and always has been since 1991 — never a podcast. That’s why Pierce’s ADVs are archived and still widely listened to today, available here: The Power of Truth (Volumes 1 through 12) Cosmotheism (cosmotheistchurch.org) or here, free: video.natall.com.
How many podcasts are archived and listened to years after they appeared? I don’t listen to podcasts at all, thank you. They seem to me to be just conversations about whatever was talked about on Good Morning America or Fox & Friends that morning.
ADV was launched on shortwave stations at first, then on AM stations but until the Internet came along organized Jewry, threatening boycott and going after stations’ advertisers, would have ADV removed from stations nearly as fast as we could have them aired on new ones — BECAUSE THEY FEARED PIERCE’S INFLUENCE, and not with just the so-called “Right” but with Whites who could listen to and be influence by him on AM radio.
You’ve come around since you said this here a couple of days ago:
For those who care only about preventing white [sic] extinction, as I do, and not at all about cosmotheism or other racial irrelevancies, the road to our racial salvation runs through Christianity…
Now, Lord, if you can ditch Jew-spawned Christian spookcraft as some sort of racial salvation, you’ll have arrived among serious race- thinkers. You say about Whites using nigger language:
It’s a great word, indeed, a great metapolitical word, developed by the multicultural/black nationalist Left, but now used as a battering ram against said Left even by otherwise timid normie-rightists…
Pierce made clear in his 1976 talk “Our Cause” that the National Alliance is neither left-wing nor right-wing, but biological — “racist,” if you prefer. I take it you count yourself among the “timid normie rightists” who prefer using nigger language to batter folks? You won’t batter me with niggerisms.
This talk that Pierce was an exterminationist because of the novel he wrote 50 years ago is nonsense. The ideas expressed in Turner are dangerous to Jewry, yes, but it’s fiction. Is the Jew Bible exterminationist? It’s fiction also and full of mass exterminations of goyim by Yahweh’s Chosen. To claim Pierce was exterminationist when he wrote non-fiction in Who We Are, also in the 1970s — available here in 26 chapters: Who We Are | Search Results | National Vanguard — is also unfounded.
The National Alliance is separatist, neither supremacist nor exterminationist. Those are words used by our Jewish watchdogs, WikiJews, and controlled media to describe Pierce and NA, and, unfortunately, by many fools in the Christian conservative, so-called right-wing.
I disagree re “woke”. It’s a perfect word for our side – short, blunt like a gut punch, immediately meaningful, and, much more than “PC” (which often got associated in the public mind with earnest liberals amusingly twisting themselves into verbal pretzels so as not to offend), woke conjures up blackness and antiwhiteness, thugs and masked white race traitors. It’s a great word, indeed, a great metapolitical word, developed by the multicultural/black nationalist Left, but now used as a battering ram against said Left even by otherwise timid normie-rightists.
That’s a good question. I don’t really know why the Jews targeted Pierce. His message would certainly have been rejected by the vast majority of white Americans, so why would they deem him a high risk individual?
Sorry but I’m not familiar with this Tubby Tubbington. Sounds like a nursery rhyme character. I agree with Shang regarding the term woke, though. It’s simple but effective. If you want to see that debate between me and Pollack, go to his blog (malcolmpollack.com) and look at the comments under the entry “You Are A Slow Learner, Winston” from 25th May. I still have no idea why they turned on me so quickly, or why he felt the need to take offence on Vallicella’s behalf. I hate when people do that. It’s so lame.
For me, a pure white man who tells me he’s going to marry a Chinese woman, I’ll stop talking to him for life. And if it doesn’t affect my job or income, I’ll spit on the ground and tell him I’ll see him and his new family on the Day of the Rope. But nationalists never talk like that, not even remotely! Like good Christians or neo-Christians they believe in loving everyone, even the traitor
You’ll threaten to take part in a mass lynching, as long as it doesn’t affect your job or income. I think that pretty much sums up White Nationalism 1.0.
You are not welcome to talk about exterminating people on this platform.
From CESAR TORT:
<https://westsdarkesthour.com/2022/08/07/on-exterminationism-2022-edition/>
This is the fifth page of the latest edition of On Exterminationism:
FOREWORD
There is no freedom of speech in Europe. Europeans have been muzzled since the Second World War. But if a young Aryan with great aspirations to do something in the darkest hour for his race visits the racialist webzines based in the First Amendment country, what does he find?
A money-making site like Greg Johnson’s, which seems more concerned with profiteering than his Nordic race? A site like Andrew Anglin’s, which only discusses recent news with no historical perspective? The site of patriot Jared Taylor who romanticises the founding fathers, or Hunter Wallace who secretly aspires to a Christian reconquest for the US? Will he go for Kevin MacDonald’s site, which focuses on the Jewish Question?
All these people lack the meta-perspective of Adolf Hitler in his after-dinner talks or the ferocity of William Pierce who, like the National Socialists, left Christian ethics behind. Pierce was the first on the American continent, in a fictional book, The Turner Diaries and in a non-fiction book Who We Are, to suggest exterminationism as the final solution to our problems.
I don’t think Tort’s description of CC is remotely fair.
But I do think “exterminationism” is a fair topic for discussion. I’m with the Christian Dostoyevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov: No God, No Ethics. Thus, for an atheist prowhite, why not exterminate (at least in theory)? Pre/non-Christian savages routinely sought to exterminate their tribal enemies (by slaying the men and, if sufficiently genetically similar, impregnating the women). I think Nietzsche would say that resistance to “exterminationism” on the part of nonbelievers is nothing but a “Christian residue”.
For me, I’m a non-exterminationist because I was raised Christian, and, although an agnostic due to unresolved philosophy-of-religion questions, I have essentially accepted “Pascal’s Wager”: I act as though Christianity were true in the hope that it is true. And if it’s false? I’ll never know that because I’ll be dead.
But if I were truly a convinced atheist, I might think quite differently about this topic.
I should have wished that after decades of tireless work by the apostles of reason and forward-thinking within our movement we could have banished from our circles all talk of Rabbi Yeshua and his multicultural Jewish kingdom in the sky, where the good goys go if they read the Jewish Bible and follow Moses’ Ten Commandments. To this end I am ready to join in the fray if we are not already too deep into the comment-tree
You write: I have essentially accepted “Pascal’s Wager”: I act as though Christianity were true in the hope that it is true. And if it’s false? I’ll never know that because I’ll be dead.
No, perhaps you will end up in Muhammad Aryan’s Jahannam. Muhammad was a Semite, like Jesus, and also claimed to be inspired by God, so we should take his word without question. Because this is how we can separate truth from centuries of deceit, sanity from centuries of insanity, and save the White race.
I’m technically an agnostic. But I recognize that there are innumerable brilliant Christians out there, far more intelligent and learned than I sense you are. Your dismissiveness reflects less on the Faith than on you.
And anyway, even if you are wiser than all the learned – simply, please note, because it appears really really strongly to you that Christianity is nonsensical (and you are the qualified judge of such matters) – the facts are a) most white non-Christians are not racialists, but egalitarian/liberal douchebags, and b) there are vast numbers of white Christians, who, as a group, are disproportionately conservative-voting. Insulting their faith in the vain hope they will abandon it on your little say-so is a far dumber approach than attempting to demonstrate the compatibility between white preservationism and the Faith.
People like you, Jim Goad, Will Williams, Cesar Tort, Spasticus etc are a huge reason why the prowhite movement, despite its raft of clear facts and irrefutable arguments, never seems to make much progress. To insult the majority beliefs of your own people – when doing so is completely unnecessary as well as hyper-counterproductive to advancing your cause – is “stupidity on stilts”.
[And note: I’m arguing above in a purely secular way. If Christianity’s claims are actually true – as they very well might be – then, of course, attacking the Faith is even more idiotic and futile.]
The message that comes through whenever you write about this is: “We need to recruit Christians. But don’t criticize them. They’re very brittle and childish. They’ll sink the white race just to spite you. Because God’s kingdom is more important to them than anything that happens on earth. We need to get these people on our side. . . .”
Even though I am not a Christian, I think most Christians are better than that. (They are better than their religion, too.) If protestants and Catholics can shelve their differences to work together on something called “Christian Nationalism,” then I am betting they can shelve their differences with non-Christians and work together on something called “White Nationalism.” And the ones that are as brittle, childish, and spiteful as you imagine are not going to help us anyway.
“You are not welcome to talk about exterminating people on this platform.”
If the American government would allow me a visa, it would be easier to talk directly to you and other racialists to convince you of my ideas.
Because right now even the toughest American racialists are willing to put on the One Ring to fight Sauron rather than understand, as Frodo finally made Faramir understand, that it was impossible to use it for Gondor’s purposes. Faramir even risked his life by disobeying his father’s laws, and he freed Frodo so he continued his journey: something that American racialists will never do.
The American white nationalist is like Boromir, always ready to ‘compromise’ with the ethos of his country.
Cesar Tort: May 28, 2024 If the American government would allow me a visa, it would be easier to talk directly to you and other racialists to convince you of my ideas…
—
Huh? Why not simply hold your laptop above your head and wade across the Rio Grande like millions of others are doing with impunity if you must be here to spread your ideas?
—
Sauron, Frodo, Faramir Gondor, Faramir, Boromir…
—
What in Hell are you talking about? I just saw you still promote Harold “Big Lie” Tubbington on your site. Your “ideas” won’t flush with those who value truth, despite your truths about Christinsanity.
Those newbies at C-C- who are ignorant of Tubby, who finally left this life in 2018, can learn about him here: “Death of a Con Man” on nationalvanguard.org.
A search of this site for ‘covington’ will show that he was popular among some here for his fictional scribblings, caring little that he was also arguably the the worst smear artist and political saboteur to ever claim to be a “movement” leader.
@ Will Williams
I’m partially Aryan, a priest of the 14 words, and my parents, despite psychologically abusing me, belonged to the Mexican elite, so I won’t certainly “wade across the Rio Grande like millions of others.”
The half-mustached Austrian genius Frodo was the only man capable of destroying the Xtian Ring. But this Frodo couldn’t even reach Mordor (Murka).
The Rohirrim and Gondorians betrayed him to Isengard (Soviet Russia), burned the Shire, killed all his friends and thousands of blond Nordics and forced him to commit suicide.
.
Senor Tort,
What happened to your website? It used to have a beautiful layout. The present one is much less aesthetically pleasing.
@Austiticus Spasticus
Don’t you think that an old dark complexed Mexican/Hispanic with an infantile psychological make-up and probably other mental issues advocating the extermination of non-whites and the unworthy is ridiculous?
He himself would be certainly euthanized in an exterminationist White ethnostate.
It’s a paradox, sure, but so are many other things in life. I mean look at me, an anti-natalist and a Far-Rightist. It takes all sorts. Tort is useful to me for unraveling the truth about Christianity, but not much else. But yes, his idea that child abuse is the cause of all our problems, and his obsession with veganism, are ridiculous. I’m pretty sure the Vikings weren’t vegans.
I’m also a ultra-rightist and anti-natalist, but not an “atheist.” Some kind of intelligence is behind the emergence of life and its evolution on this planet, it’s pretty much impossible that all happened by chance and mutations. Plus I’ve had some weird “out-of body” experiences, wich show that consciousness is not exactly a product of the brain. What’s the nature of that intelligence? I have no idea, it could well be a malevolent one or that it doesn’t even understand itself. But obviously that maniac deity Yahweh described in the Bible is ludicrous.
About Cesar Tortilla I like him because he’s funny. I even made some donations a couple of years ago, but since he banned me I evidently I stopped sending him money. He’s unintentionally funny, only picturing a fanatical Nordicist from Mexico, obsessed with blondes, “english roses,” Hitler, Wagner, and exterminating 99% of mankind, trying to maintain what he calls a “severe gravitas” in a place like Mexico surrounded by the “mudbloods” is funny.
As you noticed he’s always whining about his dastardly Catholic parents, who have probably already died long ago. Maybe the hard-core Catholicism of his parents was a way to deal with the stress and hopelessness of having to deal with such a unhinged stubborn immature personality when he was young.
Lord Shang writes:
I’m technically an agnostic. But I recognize that there are innumerable brilliant Christians out there, far more intelligent and learned than I sense you are. Your dismissiveness reflects less on the Faith than on you.
Yes, these old chestnuts – I know a black man smarter than you, your racism reflects your lack of self-esteem and accomplishment, etc, etc. Can’t you make any reference to my comment, instead of just lazily pecking them out?
And anyway, even if you are wiser than all the learned – simply, please note, because it appears really really strongly to you that Christianity is nonsensical (and you are the qualified judge of such matters) – the facts are a) most white non-Christians are not racialists, but egalitarian/liberal douchebags, and b) there are vast numbers of white Christians, who, as a group, are disproportionately conservative-voting. Insulting their faith in the vain hope they will abandon it on your little say-so is a far dumber approach than attempting to demonstrate the compatibility between white preservationism and the Faith.
Are you yourself wiser than all the learned, when you cannot present any apology for your faith other than that lots of people share it?
And you must come to understand that Christianity is an egalitarian religion, a liberal religion. I am sure that you will be able to find poll results, that I saw some while ago, which demonstrate, for example, that church attendance negatively correlates with ethnocentrism among Whites. This is the business of modern Christianity, along with ‘colorblind conservatism’ – selling those who sense that something is wrong the dream of a functioning multicultural society, this is why Catholic charities support illegals, because they are good Christians like us, because they give their children Hebrew names like us, because they have ‘family values’ like us, because they follow the ten commandments of Moses like us …
No, we do not need any Jewish charlatans to tell us not to kill our own parents, and not to steal, because the skalds sang of the hell of oathbreakers (Náströnd) while Jews in the ghettos of a Europe enslaved to fat priests and pillar-dwellers transferred their sins to chickens
People like you, Jim Goad, Will Williams, Cesar Tort, Spasticus etc are a huge reason why the prowhite movement, despite its raft of clear facts and irrefutable arguments, never seems to make much progress.
Well, this is a distinguished lineup, and I hope that in due course I will merit my position Have you considered that I may be presenting clear facts and making irrefutable arguments?
To insult the majority beliefs of your own people – when doing so is completely unnecessary as well as hyper-counterproductive to advancing your cause – is “stupidity on stilts”.
Counter-Currents, and American Renaissance, and National Vanguard, with many adjacent organizations/publications and fellow-travelers, are in the business of metapolitical activism, of vanguard- and consciousness-building, not mass politics or canvassing for Republicans. We can be heartened by electoral successes, poll results, public backlash, etc, etc., and these are useful indicators of progress, but the goal is to build a deeper and longer-lasting understanding of the core issues. Most Whites (at least in America, in my experience) also do not deeply understand human biodiversity, or the nature of Jewish power, or even basic crime statistics. If White Nationalists were to stop “insulting the majority beliefs of our own people”, that is, working to correct them when they are demonstrably false and destructive, and were imposed on our ancestors by military force (and here I mean not only Christianity, of course, recall the bayonets at the backs of protestors in Little Rock, or the aristocides of the past century and the ‘anti-fascist’ witch-hunts that continue to pervade Europe), that would mean totally assimilating into the mainstream.
I believe that Christianity is at its core an egalitarian and globalist religion – which preaches tolerance and the duty to spread the Gospel to all nations, often also by force, as it was forced on us, and generally succeeding in Africa, at least in forms and symbols, we were obliged to further develop its alien race, in which work most recently two young Americans, man and wife, were killed in the chaos in Haiti – and is therefore incompatible with White Nationalism.
[And note: I’m arguing above in a purely secular way. If Christianity’s claims are actually true – as they very well might be – then, of course, attacking the Faith is even more idiotic and futile.]
It very well might be that, when you have gone from this world, Vishnu will slap you with his thousand hands for all time, because you have grievously slandered the prophets of his Avatar. How will you regard your Pascal then?
There really are only two possibilities. Either god exists and is malevolent, or he does not exist. Theists are masochists who habitually defend their god’s divine right to be a sadist. They remind me of the battered wives who defend their scumbag husbands. They would rather have an evil god than no god at all. They believe in an imperfect-and-proud-of-it god, and we believe there is no god. The Problem of Non-God Objects is all we need to justify our choice, but there is also the fact that the universe is not anthropocentric, which is a fundamental requirement in order for theism to be true.
Greg Johnson to Lord Shang: May 30, 2024 The message that comes through whenever you write about this is: “We need to recruit Christians. But don’t criticize them. They’re very brittle and childish. They’ll sink the white race just to spite you. Because God’s kingdom is more important to them than anything that happens on earth. We need to get these people on our side. . . .”
If protestants and Catholics can shelve their differences to work together on something called “Christian Nationalism,” then I am betting they can shelve their differences with non-Christians and work together on something called “White Nationalism.” And the ones that are as brittle, childish, and spiteful as you imagine are not going to help us anyway…
That’s right. Lord is a defeatist, thinking when he dies our racial struggle won’t matter because he might be up in heaven. There’s no working with irresponsible defeatists for racial preservation. They have to come to our way of looking at the world first and foremost as racial realists, not as superstitions, gullible believers in the Jewish SkyGod.
Greg, it’s as if you read Dr. Pierce’s message to his Alliance members in our monthly BULLETIN 42 years ago with his commentary “On Christianity” See “WLP86: William Pierce on Christianity” at nationalvanguard.org
THE NATIONAL Office has received a few complaints (fewer than expected) from members about what has been perceived as an anti-Christian bias in recent issues of National Vanguard (NV). One member has resigned…
The complaints fall into two general categories: 1. “I am a Christian. Why are you attacking my religion?” and 2. “I am not a Christian, but many White people are. We must all stick together. To attack Christianity is divisive.”
It should first be noted that the National Alliance is not primarily a religious organization — at least, not in the usual sense of the word, although most members are able to recognize the strong spiritual element in the Alliance’s message. Second, it should be noted that the National Office is fully aware of the sensitive nature of the Christian religion, and for that reason NV avoided the question for a long time.
This avoidance, however, was in conflict with the Alliance’s fundamental obligation to deal forthrightly with all issues of vital concern to the welfare and progress of our race. This obligation where Christianity is concerned has become especially difficult to ignore during the past few months, with the growing strength of the Moral Majority and other right-wing Christian groups and their active participation in political matters. The leader of that organization, the Reverend Jerry Falwell, has been outspoken in his support of Zionism, and he was recently given a Zionist award by Jewish leaders. There exists a clear conflict of interests for any Alliance member who supports such an organization, and the Alliance member should not compromise in matters of this sort…
When I as a non-Christian first read that in 1992 I understood why the National Alliance did not consider White Christians ineligible for NA membership, because nearly all Whites, including Pierce and myself, had been raised in Christian homes. If introduced to Pierce’s Nature-based, reality-grounded belief system for our people, however, it was correctly assumed that new Christian members would eventually either embrace it as their own or reject it and go back to the comfort of their Christian churches.
The most honest thing I had ever seen was when Pierce wrote:
No honest, conscientious Alliance member can maintain his membership in the Alliance and also in an organization which is fundamentally opposed to the goals and principles of the Alliance. The former member who belongs to the Moral Majority acted correctly in resigning from the Alliance, and the same applies to others: Any Alliance member who is also a member of a church or other Christian organization which supports racial mixing or Zionism should decide now where he stands, and he should then resign either from his church or from the Alliance.
Christians are still eligible to join our Alliance today, and some still resign when they discover NA is not a “Christian organization, based on Christian principles.” That is as it should be. The Alliance does not pretend to be for Christians. Applicants are required to read this before applying: “What is the National Alliance” at natall.com. It states at the bottom:
Any White person (a non-Jewish person of wholly European ancestry) of good character and at least 18 years of age who accepts as his own the goals of the National Alliance and who is willing to support the program described herein may apply for membership…
There is nothing in that Alliance membership application that describes “the program therein,” that the prospective NA applicant pledges to support, that is either Christian nor anti-Christian. Christians, at least intelligent ones, should recognize that the Alliance’s ideology implicitly described therein is clearly opposed to the anti-Nature, pie-in-the-sky ideology that they were raised with — and not pledge to support it if Bible believers.
Pierce concludes that 42-year-old commentary to his Alliance members with this:
…If, despite everything above, there are Alliance members or prospective Alliance members who still consider themselves Christians, then it must be in the sense that they value the specifically White elements of Christianity which have been added since its origins — the great art, the great music, and the great architecture produced by White men during the centuries in which the Christian churches ruled Europe — and that they also share the White spiritual feelings which have been eloquently expressed by many men and women who were Christians and who applied the adjective “Christian” to feelings which, in fact, came from deep within the White race-soul and existed long before the advent of the Christian church.
Such Christians we can call our comrades and be proud to have in our ranks.
When writing my third volume i.e. ¿Me ayudarás?, I discovered that my mind was programmed by my father’s introjection i.e. Xtianity.
Only thanks to that insight was I able to control that malware. White nationalists haven’t gone through this initiation process, so they remain Christians or secular sympathisers of Judeo-Christianity
Honestly, this discussion is too weird for CC. Please confine it to your own platform.
At least Autismus Spastikos has been proven correct about CT’s daddy issues.
Apparently this is not Cesar Tort but a person pretending to be him. This troll is now banned.
The real César Tort just emailed me, warning that someone was impersonating him here on C-C and on National Vanguard. Such is the Internet and “sock puppets (false online identities used for deceptive purposes)” — the most infamous puppeteer being Mr. Tort’s hero, the fraud Harold Covington.
Just checked Tort’s site and did a search for “Covington” to find 157 entries, one from 12 years ago being “The character of Harold Covington” at westsdarkesthour.com. I couldn’t bring myself to read beyond the first couple of paragraphs in that piece where Tubby had presented a fake quote from William Pierce, but to Tort’s credit in the 15th and final comment under that puff piece he had linked to what Dr. Pierce had written to his Alliance members way back in 1992, warning them about Covington : “The Perils of Hobbyism” still found here today: “Dr. William Pierce on Harold Covington” at nationalvanguard.org.
That should have put an end to the Covington issue, yet here, nearly 32 years later, admirers of Tubbington’s fiction, like C.T., present sizable archives of gossip, with a mixture of truths vs. lies about the sorry SOB that only tend to confuse. Tort still promotes Tubby’s failed North West Front scam at his site. Give it up, César.
Hi Will Williams!
I am the real César Tort.
I was indeed a fan of Covington’s novels in the past. But thanks to Hadding Scott’s work I realised that Covington as a person was a real disgrace. He once did something similar to what this Brazilian troll, who impersonates me in several racialist, forums did: Covington used my name to say something about Scott that I hadn’t said!
He never apologized of course. Once I woke up to the realities of his flawed character, I stopped admiring him on my site and even deleted the “Harold Covington” category. However, I won’t delete my previous posts about his novels as they show how I thought before I discovered Scott’s exposé.
Finally, you should know that I discovered Covington through Counter-Currents, at a time when Michael O’Meara was publishing some favourable reviews of his novels. By the way, presently I don’t think the North West project is viable at all: it’s just literary fiction.
Anyway, thanks to you two for clearing up the above. The next time you see “César Tort” in the comments section of another forum, you’ll know it’s not me. I used the pen name “Chechar” before, even in the comments section of this site. Now I only sign with my initials but who knows if this Brazilian stalker will start using my initials in the future?
C.T.: June 4, 2024 I was indeed a fan of Covington’s novels in the past. But thanks to Hadding Scott’s work I realised that Covington as a person was a real disgrace… Once I woke up to the realities of his flawed character, I stopped admiring him on my site… I won’t delete my previous posts about his novels as they show how I thought before I discovered Scott’s exposé...
—
Hadding set that site up for me as a favor because it was needed, and I didn’t know how to do it. I fed him most of the material that was on the site. Unfortunately, he used Blogspot to do it, which is owned by Jews (Google?) and they eventually shut it down without warning before it got mirrored, or whatever.
Kevin Strom resurrected it as best he could from archive.com, but it is now quite cumbersome and practically useless. See here: “Setting the Record Straight by Hadding Scott” at nationalvanguard.org
Now, one would have to search through the various years that entries were made, then do a word search for “puppet,” for example, to learn the scores of phony personas Tubbo used to make his defamatory claims all over the Internet. I won’t do that and it’s not likely anyone else will either.
—
I discovered Covington through Counter-Currents, at a time when Michael O’Meara was publishing some favourable reviews of his novels…
—
Search for ‘covington’ on C-C and all sorts of archived articles come up praising the “disgraceful” writer of fiction with the “flawed character.” The same can be said at TOO, at your site and who knows where else, where many care more about deeply flawed if talented fiction writers than they do about the character of their imagined leaders.
—
By the way, presently I don’t think the North West project is viable at all: it’s just literary fiction.
—
I can only control National Alliance sites, not others’.
If I were you, though, to be straightforward I would broadcast my present position unambiguously rather than how you show your fans how you admired Tubby’s scribblings before you finally realized he was a world class professional smear artist and political saboteur.
Hi Will,
Good advice. Perhaps eliminating the “Harold A. Covington” category on my site resulted in visitors not noticing that my latest articles on HAC were quite critical (I even made fun of him and his affair with that porn star in my book Daybreak!).
Regarding the confusion caused by the impostor, I’d like to address the other commenters on this thread who responded to the impostor believing he was me. In order not to overwhelm this discussion thread or the patience of Dr Johnson (who I assume is the moderator), they could do so in the comments section of my site. Specifically, in this thread.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment