Counter-Currents
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 590
Two Lawyers on the Trump Verdict
Counter-Currents Radio
262 words / 1:59:32
Attorneys Jason Lee Van Dyke (Twitter) and David Zsutty were Greg Johnson‘s guests on the latest broadcast of Counter-Currents Radio, where they discussed the Trump verdict and answered listener questions. It is now available for download and online listening.
Topics discussed include:
00:02:50 The background of the case
00:05:02 Was the case about hush money?
00:09:56 Loopholes in the legal system
00:13:03 How was Donald Trump convicted?
00:16:48 The motivation for the trial was political
00:17:57 Details about proving “beyond a reasonable doubt”
00:22:26 What impact will the conviction have on the public?
00:27:02 Getting arrested is common
00:32:05 How plea deals are like extortion
00:33:24 Trump invited this
00:35:25 Trump’s election was an insult to the entire establishment
00:36:34 Might Trump go to jail before the election?
00:45:36 Can Trump win the 2024 election?
00:47:04 Along what lines would America split apart?
00:51:37 On Splitsville USA
00:54:02 Actually, Trump did pardon some of his own people
00:54:27 How the trial harms the establishment’s legitimacy
00:57:05 The Left uses lawfare to crush the Right
01:05:08 On George Soros’ prosecutors
01:05:38 Trump is better for us than Biden
01:08:33 On political magic
01:10:21 Nobody wants democracy
01:12:41 On the difference between democracy and populism
01:17:00 Aristotle’s views on polity
01:19:49 What does the Left even want?
01:21:31 The system relies on the “consent of the defeated”
01:27:11 The Right wants to separate but the Left wants control
01:29:59 The Greater Idaho movement
01:31:26 Why don’t white people riot?
01:39:18 How can national divorce be peaceful?
01:48:18 The next Homeland Institute (website, Telegram) poll
01:51:25 Deportations can be calm and peaceful
01:52:29 Can the Democrats steal the next election?
To listen in a player, click here or below. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
6 comments
That was great. Quite honestly the best discussion I’ve heard on the topic so far. A, #1, ++
Such legal minds among us!
Also thanks for putting it out on Tuesday.
One thing I don’t get is the business with the burglary. What’s the analogy there? They were going on and on with that on national review too, but it didn’t make sense to me then either.
I am totally against a National Divorce . Its not so simple as if one can simply move out of State . A parliamentary Democracy maybe. ” Getting a handle on the border is essential . And reversing the Great Replacement.” That says it all . That has my vote .
Greg didn’t know what TDS stood for? Surprised me.
It is also used for The Daily Shoah.
Some will wonder about the acronym WWWM?
Good discussion about the Trump show trials and abuses of the judicial process. An entire show could be done on “How plea deals are like extortion.” I had been offered three or four plea deals in my minor five-year political show trial when the state’s misdemeanor case against me for battery had gradually evaporated.
The dipshit special prosecutor wanted to change the charge to witness tampering, though the transcript I purchased for my appeal shows when he was cross-examining me, trying to make that stick, I told him, “When I tamper with prosecution witnesses, I don’t wait around for them to contact me first.”
When that special prosecutor’s sole “witness” (who had been sleeping with my accuser) withdrew, he even tried to get me to agree to a lesser charge of public disorderly conduct when the alleged battery was nowhere near a public place. The female judge in the case had worked for the Special Prosecutor for 15 years as his Assistant Prosecutor in an adjacent county and brought him in to prosecute me “specially” when my accuser had scared away the local County Prosecutor with outrageous accusations (in three long, illegal ex parte letters to the judge — later sealed, though I wanted those as defense exhibits), enough for his office to “disqualify” itself.
My ambitious female “defense attorney” knew of this but did not object, citing the obvious conflict of interest.
Five years of that crap, with assistance from the SPLC and controlled media, to incarcerate the National Alliance Chairman on a phony charge, figuring the Alliance would thereby somehow be “destroyed.” Lacking a plea agreement taking on 18 months of probation after prison, the court got the ineffective partial control of me that it wanted.
The WV Supreme Court justices thought I was bluffing when I told them that if I could not receive legal relief on appeal from them I would expose the entire corrupt WV system of justice in a book, which I did. I am a publisher, after all. Apparently, they were not familiar with the quote attributed to Mark Twain: “Never pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel.”
That special shyster is now running for judge himself. If only his constituents could read my account of his unmistakable show trial: The “Trials and Tribulations of a White Advocate” at nationalvanguard.com
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment