1,743 words
Black United States Senator Tim Scott placed a $14 million bet against Spencer J. Quinn’s theory about black voting patterns in the United States earlier this month. The former presidential candidate and current vice-presidential hopeful revealed that his Great Opportunity Super PAC will dedicate the above gaudy sum on minority outreach in battleground states during the run-up to the 2024 election. The money will especially go toward canvassing, paid advertising, digital marketing, and research and analytics. Efforts will be made to convince black men in particular to vote for Donald Trump and the Republicans in November.
According to AP News, Scott stated that “[m]uch to the chagrin of many folks, there’s no doubt that African American men are wide open for a political shift of partisanship.” When fielding questions from Politico, Scott estimated that there are approximately “45 to 50 percent of African American men who are open” to voting Republican in 2024.
Here we go again: Republicans reaching out to blacks. But this time maybe it won’t be so bad. Stick with me on this . . .
Yes, as repeated experience has shown, if there ever was an effort doomed to fail, this is it. Approximately nine out of ten blacks vote Democrat, and despite historic Republican efforts to woo them, that number has not significantly changed. Below is a handy chart from the Pew Research Center which demonstrates exactly how loyal blacks have been to the Democratic Party for the past 30 years:
The reasons why remain murky for most, unfortunately. If you ask colorblind, civic-nationalist Republicans, blacks vote Democrat either because Democrats bribe them with free goodies, rile them up with racial rhetoric, or because Republicans simply don’t try hard enough to win them over. The real reason, however, is that the Democrat Party better serves the racial interests of blacks and therefore deserves their support. Given that most blacks don’t have the IQ for niche ideologies such as libertarianism or altruistic causes such as environmentalism — or the moral perversity to vote against their own interests, as many whites do — they tend to vote as a racial block. They will vote for what is best for them as a group, regardless of whether they’re voting for what’s best for them as individuals. Have you noticed how the day-to-day quality of black life in America remains as lamentable as ever, yet black cultural and political status is at an all-time high? You can thank the Democratic Party and its understanding of racial realities for that.
As I have stated several times before, Democrats above all indulge blacks in their bad behavior. This allows blacks to occupy and control large portions of cities, since the crime, homelessness, drug addiction, and chaos they typically engender keeps most non-blacks away. In an almost ecological sense, the symbiotic relationship between Democrats and blacks provides the latter with territory which they then leverage into prestige on the national level. This, along with whatever free stuff the Democrats offer, means far more to the average black than tax cuts, low unemployment, abortion bans, gun rights, and whatever else Republicans like to bleat on about. This also explains why most blacks oppose gentrification. Unchecked gentrification leads to nicer neighborhoods, which invariably leads to more non-blacks moving into formerly black neighborhoods, which in turn will result in less territorial control for blacks.
I call this the Chocolate City Thesis, and it explains why blacks consistently vote Democrat.
What Tim Scott and the Republicans are offering, on the other hand, is the opposite of chocolate cities. They offer cultural assimilation and all the wealth and prosperity that goes along with the American Dream. Given Donald Trump’s pre-COVID track record being far superior to both Barack Obama and Joe Biden’s, this is no idle promise. Say what you want about Trump, but there is no reason to believe that the American economy won’t be in better shape under him than it is now. And this sounds nice until one realizes that the ultimate manifestation of such a plan — widespread prosperity and the un-ghettoization of American blacks — will relegate them as a group down to the political B-leagues, sort of what it was like before the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s.
There is no way the black political elites will willingly let this happen — and certainly not for an ethnocentric outlier; indeed, some would say race traitor – such as Tim Scott, who places his American and Christian identity before his racial one. Thus, what Tim Scott is offering is poison for the black North American diaspora, and they will be right to reject it.
In spite of this, however, I guardedly welcome his ill-advised initiative. First, if there is going to be any minority outreach by the GOP, black on black is the way to go. The Trump campaign is not officially involved, and according to the Daily Beast has “shuttered minority outreach centers across the country.” If true, this is great news. Trump needs to adhere to the Sailer strategy as much as possible while deemphasizing red herrings such as the platinum plan, prison reform, and black unemployment. Nobody cares, especially blacks. Whites make up Trump’s highly enthusiastic base, and he needs to cater to their urgent demands first and foremost if he wants to win. Yes, the juice probably won’t be worth the squeeze for Scott, but as long as Trump is not doing the squeezing himself, who’s going to complain?
Secondly, there is the obvious strategic gain of forcing the Democrats to expend resources defending a front that until recently it had less need to defend. According to AP News, this seems to be what’s happening:
Trump has held a number of events in recent weeks aimed at those groups, including a rally in the New York’s South Bronx and a dinner Wednesday evening with students and alumni from historically Black [sic] colleges and universities at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida.
At the same time, national Democrats are investing heavily in stopping Trump from making inroads with a core constituency. Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, the first Black vice president, last week launched a Black voter outreach campaign by pointing to their efforts to boost funding for those schools, forgive federal student loan debt and pardon those sentenced for simple marijuana possession.
So win-win, right? Well, maybe. But there is an additional wrinkle that might — might! — give more credence to Tim Scott’s efforts than they would typically deserve: illegal immigration. I predict that black support for the Democratic Party will start to crater once the Democrats begin abandoning the Chocolate City Thesis. And with millions of illegal immigrants having to live somewhere in America, it stands to reason that many blacks are facing a territorial threat much more dire than that of gentrification — all thanks to their own political party. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, thousands of migrants have recently been resettled in black neighborhoods in Chicago, and the residents are not happy about it:
Now, the migrant issue has been placed right in the laps of these same Black folks. Thousands of migrants have been resettled in Black neighborhoods, and the city, county and state developed a plan to support them.
As part of that plan, City Council members were asked last month to support a new $70 million investment in our migrant mission that, coupled with money from the state and county, will equal $300 million. This investment felt like a strong-arm robbery when you consider the meager investments Black leaders have asked for and been denied. To many, it was offensive . . .
The Los Angeles Times provides a history lesson about immigrants coming to Chicago and notes the irony of today’s blacks becoming the new whites:
Hundreds of thousands of Black Southerners moved to Chicago in the early 20th century in search of greater freedoms and economic opportunities. White Chicagoans at the time accused them of receiving disproportionate resources from the city, and in 1919 tensions boiled over.
In a surge of racist attacks in cities across the U.S. that came to be known as “Red Summer,” white residents burned large swaths of Chicago’s Black neighborhoods and killed 38 Black people, including by lynching.
“Those white folks were, like, ‘Hell no, they’re coming here, they’re taking our jobs,’’’ said Richard Wallace, founder of Equity and Transformation, a majority-Black community group that co-hosted a forum in March to improve dialogue between Black and Latino residents.
Wallace said he hears echoes of that past bigotry — intentional or not — when Black Chicagoans complain about the assistance being given to migrants. It makes him wonder: “How did we become like the white folks who were resisting our people coming to the city of the Chicago?”
Also, take a gander at this 2017 exchange between Ann Coulter and Anna Kasparian in which Coulter, conservative legacy American that she is, argues on behalf of blacks being displaced in their own neighborhoods by immigrants. Kasparian then, like any good Leftist, responds by eschewing victimhood and promoting a free-market, can-do attitude when it comes to learning new languages.
It’s a bizarre world we’re living in, isn’t it?
At this point this is all speculation, but when there is some polling backing up Tim Scott’s optimism, maybe there is something there. According to NPR:
“There’s a lot of reasons why the shift is now becoming so blatantly obvious that it is now undeniable that there is something amiss. It’s real,” Scott said in a meeting Wednesday with a group of reporters. “It’s not just racial, but it’s going to manifest itself in a racial shift that we haven’t seen in probably three decades of politics.” . . . In a recent poll by GenForward, conducted by the University of Chicago, just 33% of young Black people said they would support Biden if the election were held today — and 23% chose Trump. While the poll showed significant undecided and third party sentiment, Biden won Black voters under 45 by more than 80% in 2020.
This could all be nothing more than an elaborate and cynical scheme by which Tim Scott will make himself Vice President (“Pick me, Mr. Trump! Pick me!”). Even worse, this all could all be moot by November if the people who stole the last election have the wherewithal to do it again — or if, God forbid, Trump gets the Derek Chauvin treatment at Rikers Island.
Either way, the fact that illegal immigration may ultimately vindicate the Chocolate City Thesis while ushering American blacks back to the party of Lincoln shows that we’re living in interesting times.
Tim%20Scott%20andamp%3B%20the%20Chocolate%20City%20Thesis%0A
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
Related
-
John Doyle Klier’s Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881-1882, Part 2
-
Detransitioning the US Military
-
John Doyle Klier’s Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881-1882, Part 1
-
Purging the Woke Military
-
The Worst Week Yet: November 17-23, 2024
-
Critical Daze
-
What White Nationalists Want from the Trump Administration
-
American Renaissance 2024: Joy in the Morning (and All Day Long)
6 comments
I’m leaning towards the upcoming election being a carbon copy of 2020. There’s an endless supply of Wanda The Stuffer’s out there.
If you don’t have territory, you cannot have the same kind of power as people who do.
‘Territorial analysis’ is a great way of understanding the concrete charater of the White Nationalist struggle.
Well argued and provocative, as always with Quinn. But we’ll just have to see. The Chocolate City thesis is fairly sound as a general explanation. But let’s not overlook individual circumstances. Leftist policies suck – and that’s not only racial policies. Every last thing they do makes life worse for most people (exception: the Left’s fanatical abortionism, which at least keeps the dysgenic population lower than otherwise).
Many people are hurting financially, and the economy was objectively superior for average folks under Trump. Blacks might prefer to vote for their party, but hope for improvement in their personal circumstances might override that preference.
And there’s nothing wrong with the GOP reaching out to blacks, or anyone else, provided they don’t sacrifice legitimate white interests, or their basic conservative platform policies, in doing so (by, eg, proposing some egregiously unconservative and antiwhite “Platinum Plan” wealth giveaway to blacks, as Trump did previously).
You’ve highlighted something that is also happening in the UK, for slightly different reasons. Blacks need to be centre-stage – this we already knew – and if the spotlight turns elsewhere they will become uppity, for want of a better word. They are facing stiff competition from immigrants for charity resources. What if those immigrants start to get the positive affirmation that has been the game reserve of blacks for so long? In the UK, after the high tide of BLM (when the Muslim caucus stayed pretty quiet apart from vague gestures of support they didn’t really mean), Muslims are once again centre-stage. Both main parties are desperate for the Muslim vote, and blacks are all over the media trying to divert attention back to their endless whining. We must hope Trump doesn’t waste too much time courting the black vote., and concentrates on his white heartland.
Sadly, there aren’t enough unwoke whites to win the US Presidency by themselves (there might be enough in the UK to win No. 10; I don’t know). And Trump already has all of us. He must reach out to nonwhites. But I think blacks are a lost cause.
The group to approach is the Latinos. Many of them have considerable admixtures of white blood (and a substantial number actually classify themselves as “white”). Many are Christian, and receptive to “Christian nationalism”; unsurprisingly, they are now stronger than whites wrt the totality of what falls under “traditional family values”. Separate from their faith biases, they are not nearly as pro-LGBTQ as whites (very, very few Latinos believe “gender transitioning” is real). A greater proportion than of any other group, including whites, works in the private sector. They have a much greater rate of small business formation than blacks. I don’t view Latinos as “natural Republicans’, and I certainly want the border sealed, illegals all deported, and nonwhite legal immigration of every kind permanently halted. But Republicans have a much better chance winning Latinos than blacks, whatever the self-interested Tim Scott might claim.
Republicans also have a much greater chance of making inroads with Asians than blacks. Many of the former are home and business owners, as well as higher income professionals, and they generally hate affirmative action. OTOH, we have little chance with Muslims, especially given the pro-Israel bias of the GOP (necessitated in part by the staunch support for Israel from evangelicals).
There was only one Black that I liked that supported Trump back in 2016 -Sheriff David Clark. I would never vote for a Black anywhere, anytime or anyplace. A Hindu I would.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment