I am going to be a little more charitable towards the Titan submarine tragedy than my esteemed colleagues Jim Goad, Gunnar Alfredsson, and Thomas Steuben. All three look at the anti-white virtue-signaling, the incessant cost-cutting, and the reckless disregard for safety practiced by now-deceased OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush and conclude that perhaps this little disaster does not quite warrant the copious teardrops being shed over it like the water that crushed the submersible near the wreck of the Titanic wreckage on June 18, instantly killing its five occupants — including Rush himself.
They’re not wrong, of course. My schadenfreude did surge when learning about Rush’s fashionably perverse comments about his own race and sex, such as when he talked about his disdain for hiring “50-year-old white guys.” There is also a lot of irony and meaning imbuing the whole fiasco — which, of course, gives writers like me something to write about. Rush can be seen as the Icarus of the sea. An Aesopian moral could be fashioned about the price one pays for alienating one’s own people. The very name of the submersible symbolizes of the hubris of Man — as did, ironically, the name of the doomed vessel it was intended to visit. (I know, I know, “irony is not coincidence”, but still . . .) As a result of all this deeper meaning, it is difficult not to view the Titan disaster as a sort of cosmic comeuppance — at least for the late Stockton Rush.
I had never heard of the man before all this, and so I don’t know about whatever redeeming qualities he might have possessed. But I also refuse to let go of my sadness and sense of tragedy. This was a needless loss of innocent human life, including that of a teenager. Yes, these were wealthy men going on a high-risk adventure in what amounted to a $250,000 bath toy. But does that mean we should do the Mashed Potato over their watery graves? What harm did they do other to themselves on their way to becoming a permanent footnote to Titanic lore?
As I was dithering emotionally over this news item, I read of another maritime tragedy, which instantly cemented my perspective on the Titan. I had been counting all the ways the allegorical Stockton Rush did and did not deserve his demise. But after hearing of this other incident, I saw Stockton Rush as a tragic hero of Faustian proportions, worthy of song — or at least a 30-page black-and-white graphic novel. Hey, he may have been a race traitor, but he was our race traitor, buddy!
The other story I am referring to is that of a fishing trawler overloaded with up to 750 “refugees” from Pakistan, Egypt, Syria, and Palestine that sank off the coast of Greece. In comparison to that, the doomed Titan was the epitome of Promethean glory.
This migrant liner capsized on June 14 over one of the Mediterranean Sea’s deepest points. According to the latest reports as of this writing, 82 of its passengers are confirmed dead, 104 were rescued, and the rest are still missing and presumed dead, despite the efforts of the Greek coast guard, navy, and air force to locate and rescue survivors. It is estimated that 50 to 100 of the passengers were children — and according to the reports, none of the people rescued were wearing life jackets.
Much criticism has been leveled at the Greek authorities for not acting quickly enough to avert the disaster or to save the passengers, but the Greeks did try to establish contact with the stricken vessel and save it:
Greek and United Nations authorities were first alerted about the boat, which was heading for Italy, on June 13. They then surveyed the area and repeatedly tried to call and contact the ship, but all requests for help were declined as passengers repeatedly expressed that they wanted to continue their journey.
Later in the day on June 13, a merchant ship supplied the fishing boat with food and supplies. However, later attempts to try and supply help were declined by passengers. A coast guard patrol boat moved alongside the ship before it ultimately capsized in the early hours of June 14.
None other than former US President Barack Obama weighed in on the events while in Greece a few days later. As would be expected, he complained about how the comparatively miniscule Titan, the fate of which was still in doubt at the time, was hogging all the news coverage while this much greater human tragedy was being more or less ignored:
‘There is a potential tragedy unfolding with the submarine that is getting minute-to-minute coverage all around the world,’ [Obama] said. ‘This is understandable because we all want and pray that these folks are rescued. But, the fact that this has got so much more attention than the fact that 700 people sank is an untenable situation.’
The International Organisation for Migration called it one of ‘the worst sea tragedies in the last decade’.
Obama also brought up the parallels in an interview with CNN earlier on Thursday. When talking about how democracies can’t thrive with high levels of inequality, he used the sub tragedy as an example.
‘In some ways, it’s indicative of the degree to which people’s life chances have grown so disparate.’
Obama’s comments illustrate the stark difference between Left and Right these days, and also how far the Left has fallen. Well over a century has passed since the advent of progressivism, when the Left pursued reasonable goals such as establishing two-day weekends, abolishing child labor, and ensuring safer working environments. Today, prominent Lefties such as Obama are empathizing with unassimilable illegal immigrants as they invade Europe in order to get on public welfare and ultimately replace its indigenous populations. By the same token, over 50 years have passed since we put a man on the Moon, and while the Titan was at best a degraded manifestation of the same intrepid spirit, it still retained some of that noble sentiment.
“Why pay a quarter of a million dollars to take this cheap contraption 12,000 feet underwater, where it can be crushed in nanoseconds by 400 atmospheres of pressure, to see the Titanic, which we have already seen countless times on film and in photographs? Because it’s there, man! Because it’s there!”
It is indeed easy to lampoon, but a purer form of that same spirit also burned in men such as Ernest Shackleton and Edmund Hillary, who are impossible to lampoon. They took tremendous personal risks to accomplish great things and expand Man’s access to his world. It was partly arrogance, but partly daring as well. Such feats transfix millions because they demonstrate that there is something more to life than fulfilling one’s selfish desires. Surely not everyone is cut out for risking his life for a cause or an ideal, but the fact that some of us are is a source of inspiration. This is why the Titan story gets more airtime than Obama’s precious barbarian barge. Those people were acting entirely out of self-interest, even as their self-interest threatened the interests of the very Europeans whose lands they were invading. What’s inspiring about that?
It is certainly a shame that even one of those passengers had to die. But they were planning to enter Europe illegally, and bring with them the criminal pathologies of North Africa and the Middle East, to say nothing of all the violence and repression of Islam. They did not belong, and they did not care. They were willing participants in the Great Replacement — a cross between Jean Raspail’s Camp of the Saints and Derek Turner’s Sea Changes, if you will. Once there are a certain number of these people in Europe, it will ultimately force a devastating civil war, the eradication of whites as a distinct racial group, or Europe’s total submission to Islam. And all three outcomes are intolerable.
With the European migrant population now lighter by 650 people, perhaps whichever one of these outcomes God decides to test us with will be postponed by a month or two. Maybe the European whites of the future will use that extra time to help stem the tide. Who knows?
The best solution would have been for the vagrant vessel to turn around and take all those people safely back to where they came from. In lieu of that, the actual outcome turned out to be preferable to the ship docking in Italy with all its passengers on board. Is that coldhearted of me? Or was it more coldhearted for that ship’s captain not to issue life jackets to his huddled urchins? Or perhaps the urchins themselves were being quite coldhearted by planning to occupy a land that doesn’t belong to them in a form of squatters’ rights?
Whatever else might be said about him, you can’t accuse Stockton Rush of that. At the very least, we should give the man credit for going down with his own ship. There is a great deal of honor in that. He may have had his flaws as a captain and businessman — and he certainly deserves posthumous censure for his hidebound opinions on white men — but at least he believed enough in his product to walk it like he talked it. The same cannot be said of that fishing trawler captain, who made sure to save his own skin after presiding over the drowning deaths of a staggering 85% of his clientele.
Although it may not turn out to be such a good thing for him after all. The Daily Mail reported that “[n]ine survivors have been arrested on suspicion of people smuggling — including the ship’s captain . . .”
Talk about irony. Maybe that’s another reason why the story was underreported in the media, rather than Barack Obama’s oh-so-tiresome blather about “inequality.”
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
What%20About%20That%20Other%20Maritime%20Disaster%3F
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
Pogroms as a Cautionary Tale
-
John Doyle Klier’s Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881-1882, Part 3
-
John Doyle Klier’s Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881-1882, Part 2
-
John Doyle Klier’s Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881-1882, Part 1
-
Why Canada Can No Longer Have Nice Things
-
Critical Daze
-
Pump the Brakes on the Popular Vote
-
Letter to an Oligarch
12 comments
My take on Rush is that he was positioning himself as the, “Musk of The Sea.” That is, he saw an opening to be the person who would, like Bezos and Musk and Branson in space, pioneer deep sea tourism. Of course, that means pandering to the rich. At the same time, he also brought in the mimicry of trying to commoditize building such vessels to lower the costs and be again, more like Musk and Bezos. Still further he was mimicking Zuckerberg’s software engineering ethos of, “move fast and break things.” That is an ethos where even if you release a product that is crappy, buggy or hard to use, you get the product out there before a competitor. Well, if your newsfeed of cat photos is broken, who cares. If your cheap components and untested systems break, you die and everyone with you.
So, Rush, was hardly a Faustian adventurer. He was a cook who was seeking glory. His glory seeking was not bold in any way in accordance with the deGamas, Colombos, Magellans, Caesars, Alexanders, Pelayos … … and other great men of The West. He was being a follower who saw an opportunity to cobble together some piecemeal mimicry of other, in historic comparisons, pretty mediocre men and garner acclaim. In short, Rush was a small souled bugman.
Of course, sprinkled on top of it all, was the cowardice of castigating young men of his own race in order to be an inspiring figure. What kind of scum inspires the world to slam the door on the future of his own folk? The worst kind of scum.
So, he and his passengers got what they deserved, as did the invaders on the high seas. Someday, when we ship off Obama, Macron, Cuban and the countless other traitors and subversives their ship will sink. Then, we’ll do what all the white men who used their bravery and skill to reclaim the Titan should have done, we’ll just shrug and go about the business of building a better world that won’t miss them for a second.
I agree with this assessment of Rush. This part, I don’t think it’s entirely accurate:
“Of course, sprinkled on top of it all, was the cowardice of castigating young men of his own race in order to be an inspiring figure. What kind of scum inspires the world to slam the door on the future of his own folk? The worst kind of scum.”
Judging by the engineers he eventually hired, he wasn’t so much against young white men as against the 51 yo part from his now infamous quote. Most or all of his team was comprised of young white people. True, you could say he didn’t have much of a choice.
The Hunter/Joe Biden stuff was just starting to heat up when they cut to the Titan saga. There may be one hundred shipwrecks like it that weren’t covered by the msm. And yet we are treated to another psyop about refugees dying by the sea, just so we can be lectured to about the “inequality” of the twin fiascos.
This is one of the best essays about ‘refugee invasions’ yet. Yes, I am terribly sorry that any of them had to perish, but being Moslems, they had read the passages in the Koran (which I will have to look up and append) that it is good when Moslems emigrate to foreign lands, for it brings the words of Mohammed and the Koran to these foreign peoples that they may learn of the teachings of Allah. It can’t be clearer than that as to why these people climb aboard obviously unsafe boats to ‘come see us’ — that they may convert and absorb us. We must make this clear as one of the underlying causes of The Great Replacement.
Thank you so much for saying that, Alexandra. I really appreciate it.
By the way, Syria, Palestine, Egypt, Pakistan and Afghanistan — and all the other numerous ‘Stans’ — are breeding grounds for ISIS, al Qaeda, and the Taliban, and all their offshoots and random, unnamed Jihadis. They are the enemies of all of Europe, where they are headed in their overloaded boats, as well as our blatant enemies as 9/11 had clearly announced. They are just a small detail as to why we need to close our borders. Ah, but I forget — all people are equal. Mea culpa.
The incoming tide of economic migrants are quite literally colonisers rather than refugees. Doubtless there exists some leftist casuistry whereby colonisation can only flow from the oppressor to the oppressed, but history teaches us that this need not be so. That people, including women and children, lose their lives in such ventures is tragic, but ultimately the responsibility and agency lies with those undertaking the voyage.
It was a tragedy, because there were 104 survivors.
Seconded.
Well I’m not sure I agree with this.
The media also talk about the pod because it’s about rich people and rich people matter.
And it ties into the Titanic and its perhaps overblown place in popular consciousness. Things in popular consciousness also matter in general, whether they are organic or not, because one thing can bolster others to form a preferred reality.
They didn’t talk much about the drowning muds because given the choice of stories, they don’t care that much. Sure, out of the corner of their mouths they’ll point to it and make emotional comparisons with fake tears, but it’s synthetic.
Privately, they are really not that animated by hordes of drowning rapefugees coming to claim gibs, other than to periodically bash whitey for being racist and not doing enough. And it’s best not to constantly remind Europeans they are being flooded.
So that angle has taken a back seat here, at least for the time being. Presented with the choice, the pod and this Liberal Voyage into Splat has been a much more fascinating, high value story for everyone.
I don’t buy this Faustian angle myself, rather this whole saga has thrown a spotlight onto the pastimes of rich people and this exclusive private world of the Explorer’s Club.
It’s one thing being the first to climb Everest or visit the Titanic but I’m not sure it’s exploring or pushing back the boundaries of human knowledge or science after the 300th time or whatever.
At that point it’s a kind of fetish, indulgence, posturing and extreme tourism.
I have very little time for these rich white men in their ridiculous jumpsuits pretending to be Captian Nemo. It’s painful to watch. This is the white man acting the fool, indulging himself in his own nonsense. “As the world burns around me I’ll explore the Titanic!”. Great idea.
Some of these fools – who should have known better on a technical level because they did have experience, but got conned and flattered into getting in this pile of junk by Rush.
There are even now reports his pod was actually audibly cracking in earlier missions, and they could tell how deep they were going by the intensity of the cracking noises. Incredible. This could have happened at any time.
But still they go in. So there was a failure at the outset of the most basic level.
The story has exposed the gap in thinking between the rich and the less well off.
“I’m rich, therefore I’m right” really does have limits.
“…a purer form of that same spirit also burned in men such as Ernest Shackleton and Edmund Hillary, who are impossible to lampoon. They took tremendous personal risks to accomplish great things and expand Man’s access to his world.”
You severely misunderstand what is meant by “Faustian Spirit”.
Not every personal risk, courage and physical hardship is “Faustian”. The Guiness book of records if full of foolish accomplishments. In order for a “spirit” to be Faustian, it must aim to push the limits of human knowledge or faculties. Like the very Faust, who knew much but wanted to know more (“Zwar weiß ich viel, doch möcht’ ich alles wissen”).
This may or may not imply physical hardship or risk as the great white engineers and scientists and explorers have shown. Neither Shackleton nor Hillary and least of all Stockton Rush advanced human knowledge or technology an inch.
Trying to get at 90° latitude or at the top of a mountain is brave but not Faustian. We knew before that there is nothing to expect at the South Pole and that the air above the Everest is thin.
Obama is quoted as things being “untenable”. He is absolutely correct but in the wrong direction and context. This facilitation of amassing criminals in lands foreign to them is direct attack on the human rights of the white population in Europe and North America and yet not only is it accepted as one set of ‘rights’ being more important than that of the other demographic, it is celebrated by way of being a cultural and political inevitability.
When we are being ruled and ignored by people who despise us (regardless of the colour or ethnicity of the elites) I do fear for our future and how do we stop this in the first instance and then how do we reverse this?
One only has to look at South Africa and what has happened to a white minority there by way of Black Economic Empowerment. It may take a century or there may be pockets of minority white (in cities for example) that will soon suffer in a similar way to our white friends in SA.
We need a change of the electoral system in the UK, Europe and the USA but I can’t see any way how this will be achieved in the current political place we find ourselves. They certainly won’t ask our views by way of voting be that via a national election with policies to reverse this disaster or by way of a referendum on immigration.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment