Counter-Currents
The Revolution will Not Be Televised, but It Will Be Retarded
Jim Goad
Darrell Brooks
1,787 words
I can name at least six people who won’t be eating Thanksgiving dinner in Waukesha, Wisconsin today:
- Virginia Sorenson, 79
- LeAnna Owen, 71
- Tamara Durand, 52
- Wilhelm Hospel, 81
- Jane Kulich, 52
- Jackson Sparks, 8
They were killed last Sunday afternoon in the Milwaukee suburb of Waukesha, Wisconsin during the town’s annual Christmas parade, whose theme this year was “Comfort and Joy.”
There may be more fatalities by the time this article is published, because the . . . uh . . . the incident . . . the accident . . . the crash . . . the rampage . . . the purposeful anti-white vehicular massacre and overdue revolutionary declaration of a global race war . . . also injured 62 others, many of whom are still languishing in intensive care.
All of those who died are white. There may be non-white victims among those who were injured, but I am unaware of any yet. Waukesha is 78.27% non-Hispanic white and only 3.4% black. However, the police chief is black, as is the Milwaukee man who stands accused of plowing through all those white parade marchers.
The attack happened less than 48 hours after the acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha, which is a mere 55 miles away from Waukesha. Although the people that Rittenhouse killed were not black and Rittenhouse has subsequently claimed to be a supporter of Black Lives Matter and would probably poop his pants if he heard a nigger joke, the blind, retarded narrative-pushers insisted on making his entire case about white supremacy and how it’s hard out there in Wisconsin for felonious black pedophiles.
Wisconsin is so frickin’ ridiculously Middle American that even the black police chief has a Fargo accent that upon first listen is disarming and seems almost impossible. But less than 12 hours after all those Cheese State crackers were mowed down in the blindingly wholesome streets of Waukesha, the chief made a point of stressing that there was no evidence that what happened was a terrorist attack.
About the whole “terrorism” thing — I think it’s as useless and subjective an allegation as “hate crime” is. It’s already illegal to bomb buildings or murder people, so infusing legally-defined crimes with a hyperemotional and socially volatile narrative that can’t ever be conclusively proved because even if the perpetrator came right out and said he was motivated by hate or the desire to terrorize people, he could be lying. None of us — and I’m talking to you specifically — can read minds, no matter how much we pretend we can and no matter how much the logical fallacy known as “appeal to motive” constitutes the overwhelming majority of what passes for political discourse these days.
More importantly, though, labeling some violent acts as “terrorism” and “hate crimes” makes them more likely to be aggressively prosecuted in shameless show trials and used symbolically to whip up the emotions of an easily manipulated public who wouldn’t recognize a double standard if they were run over in the street by a maroon-colored Ford Escape with it.
And since both the victims and the alleged perpetrator in the Waukesha Christmas Parade Massacre were highly inconvenient to the idea of how “hate crimes” are currently defined, the pathologically lying mandarins of the Fourth Estate are already shoving the whole bloody agonizing mess down the memory hole. When Heather Heyer died after James Fields rammed his car into a crowd of Antifa rioters who were illegally clogging a street in downtown Charlottesville four years ago, the story dominated the news cycle for months and still captures headlines; when at least a half-dozen people died in Waukesha this past Sunday amidst a legal annual parade, the story slipped from the front pages almost immediately.
Every time I checked Twitter during the first couple days after the massacre, the site carefully kept the story out of its “What’s Happening” section. When Twitter finally included the fact that the suspect had been charged with homicide in its “What’s Happening” section, it referred to the incident as a “crash” and for some reason found the need to attach the phrase “Unite the Right” — the aborted rally which happened in 2017 and where one person died rather than six — to the story.
Clearly, all lives don’t matter equally. Only a racist would think they did.
In its caption on a Ring video where the suspect, after fleeing his vehicle, beseeched a white homeowner to call an Uber for him, NBC News referred to the mass murder as an “accident.” CBS News claimed that an “SUV rammed into bystanders.” They need to get rid of all these murderous self-driving cars immediately.
You can buy Jim Goad’s Whiteness: The Original Sin here.
Even after evidence came out that an eight-year-old white boy had died of his injuries and that the driver had purposely plowed into a crowd, CNN referred to it as a mere “incident.” The dead guy in the Ahmaud Arbery case was black and the guy who shot him was white, and CNN made it all about race; the scruffy fella charged with deliberately running over dozens of white people in Waukesha is black, but CNN didn’t mention race at all.
Coming, as the attack did, less than 48 hours after and an hour’s drive away from the Rittenhouse verdict, many openly suggested that it was payback — or even “karma” — for the white lad’s acquittal. BLM activist Vaun Mayes suggested that Waukesha’s bloody Sunday may be the spark that lights the “revolution,” by which he appears to mean “race war”:
I can tell you that the initial person who reached out to me said that they believe that this has to do with the [Rittenhouse] verdict, and so I made an assumption of which side it would be from, but I don’t know. . . . But it sounds possible that the revolution has started in Wisconsin. It started with this Christmas parade.
The accused, 39-year-old Darrell Brooks, is — of course — an “aspiring rapper” who went by the handle “MathBoi Fly” and in 2020 posted that he approved of Colin Kaepernick’s suggestion that it may be time for a “revolution” in the wake of the world’s tragic loss of that undeniable asset to humanity named George Floyd.
If, say, there existed such a thing as Klansmen who were screenwriters, they couldn’t have written a more stereotypically dumb-ass negroidal thug than Darrell Brooks. We’re dealing with a real brainiac here. In a rap ditty of his called “Minnesota,” he spat the following line: “We ain’t doin’ no more marchin, it’s time to get retarded.”
As far as I can discern, “get retarded” is lower-class black patois that means “start the revolution.”
Brooks has been arrested a lot. I mean, a lot. At the time of Sunday’s massacre, he was out on $1,000 bail for — wait for it — allegedly running over his baby mama with his SUV in a gas station on November 5 after punching her with a closed fist. Police say they “observed tire tracks on her left pants leg.”
At the time he was bailed out, he was already out on $500 bail for an incident last summer where he allegedly shot someone — this, despite him being a convicted felon who isn’t permitted to be around firearms. During those two easy-money bailouts, there had already been a standing warrant for Brooks in Nevada for allegedly neglecting to inform authorities that he’d moved out of the state. You see, he’s a convicted sex offender in Nevada, but in his defense, he says, “I didn’t know the bitch was 16.” (According to numerous reports, the bitch was 15, but let’s not quibble.)
Apart from his kiddie-pimping conviction in Nevada, he has allegedly been arrested in Wisconsin at least 15 times since 1997. The cherry on top of all that is a battery charge in Georgia from May of this year. And still he was free to lurk the streets in his SUV.
You could scour the entire social-media history of Kyle Rittenhouse, Derek Chauvin, George Zimmerman, Darren Wilson, and most of the other high-profile reputed White Supremacist Murdering Hatemongers of the last generation, and all of them combined would not even enter the same Galaxy of Hate to be found in the rhetorical trail of anti-white slime that the little five-foot-seven, 126-pound dreadlocked mulatto named Darrell Brooks left behind him. As far as openly articulated racial hatred goes, I don’t even think Dylann Roof comes close.
In a post from June 9, 2020, he wrote:
LEARNED ND TAUGHT BEHAVIOR!! so when we start bakk knokkin white people TF out ion wanna hear it . . . the old white ppl 2, KNOKK DEM TF OUT!! PERIOD . .
This, from the man who likely shut the lights on at least five “old white ppl” and counting.
In 2016, he ominously reposted something said by a St. Paul, Minnesota police officer about how to treat protesters who block traffic: “Run them over. Keep traffic flowing and don’t slow down for any of these idiots who try and block the street.”
On July 4, 2020, he posted a video of a white man beaten down bloody in the street during the ongoing George Floyd riots.
He posted a meme of MLK smiling in the sky as white slaves work the fields and a black master whips them. Another meme suggested that non-whites share a common enemy in whites. He shared some confused and brain-dead Black Israelite-style doggerel about Hitler realizing that the real Jews were black. He posted a picture of the venomously anti-white black militia Not Fucking Around Coalition and added a “target” emoji.
Even though Waukesha’s token black Chief of Police ruled out terrorism from the get-go, the lyrics to Brooks’ rap tune “Loudmouths” include “yeh we terrorists” and “killers in the city.” Another song featured the charming couplet, “They gonna need a cleaner for the shit we did, all my killers Gacy where them bodies hid.” Yet another of his tunes is titled “Gon Kil U.” In one of his rap videos, Brooks gesticulates before the maroon SUV that would roll over the parade marchers.
Despite desperate attempts to downplay the event as an “accident,” the official criminal complaint against Brooks says he deliberately drove through parade barriers and had not been involved in a police chase. It quotes a policeman who says he pounded on Brooks’ hood after Brooks entered the parade route and commanded him to stop, but the aspiring rapper and retarded revolutionary ignored him and kept on going. A detective quotes a witness who says, “As I continued to watch the SUV, it continued to drive in a zig zag motion. It was like the SUV was trying to avoid vehicles, not people. There was no attempt made by the vehicle to stop, much less slow down.”
“All of a sudden,” one witness said, “there wasn’t any music.” The city’s mayor said the parade was a “Norman Rockwell-type” event that “became a nightmare.”
It’s all so pointlessly stupid. But don’t worry your pretty little white head, because it’s already old news.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
41 comments
Another great article Jim. This is the best summary I have seen of this incident so far.
Without question.
100% agreed. This essay should appear on the front page of the Wall Street Journal, if not every other paper. But it won’t. Whites are living under an Occupationist Regime.
I hope there is no more violence. The masks need to come off, and the police need to be fully funded. A functioning country is all I want.
This now appears to be too much to ask for.
I had to dig out my copy of Let It Burn, the classic account of MOVE, to revisit the photo section. It reproduces a photo published in the papers of a burly, stern-faced dreadlocked black man hoisting a big container helpfully labeled GASOLINE to the roof of a Philly rowhouse. The caption in the book reads “Despite the publication of this photo in the days before the confrontation, Police Commissioner Sambor insisted that he had no knowledge that MOVE had gasoline on the roof before the bomb was dropped.” In my memory of that photo the black man was using a pulley to assist, but no, he was using just his own brute force, appropriately because pulleys are a “faggot” white invention, MOVE probably thought.
I echo Nick Nolte’s opening line in Blue Chips: “How bad can it get? Just how goddamn bad can it get!?” Though his infamous mugshot is a more pleasant sight than this typical worthless googly-eyed…criminal. I’m biting my hand bloody to keep the discourse professional and not go Norseman berserker on Chimpmania. Here’s the Truth for pesky facts guy and source dude: Whites in amerika are under murderous attack by a sadistic cabal of you-know-whos (disproportionately, though not exclusively), money-power consortiums and their liege hordes of accomplices and minions of all shades and rotten creeds. In their wet dream of white extinction, antifa, blm, normiebores and LGBTQP+WTF are very easy to control and dispose of in the one-world project’s interest. I disagree with Jim on this point – I can absolutely read this prick’s mind since it’s a waste-of-space dead zone where useful thoughts dare not go. “dat be waycist, peckawood cracka, slap a ho, bitch-ass nigga..” The end. He and its fellow think-nots of prison-state regulars are only qualified for endless mockery on Maury or, in a sane world, as the trial-tested for Stoddard/De Gobinaeu’s postulates and eugenics advocacy. Like sunlight to vampires, sound judgement and collective urbanity doesn’t mesh with the urban and being sloshed off the sizzurp doesn’t help. The one-world internationale’s propaganda wing referencing these anti-white attacks as crashes or incidents or activism is to be expected then forgotten. I’m pissed off, and far more so that not enough whites are; ultra-potent nose torks can’t wake up the already gone to chronic zombification. Apparently, the dark winter has come early this year at the nadir of Kali-Yuga. Happy Thanksgiving!
Not terrorism, just a lowlife black thug criminal doing what they’ve always done. Avoid at all costs and never relax.
html, body {background: #171717; color:#fff} p {margin: 10px; 0}
This was textbook terrorism, as far as I can see – murder of civilians to advance a political agenda. I suppose we need to define the difference between “mass murder” and “terrorism”.
Thanks for all the minute details of this story — the rap lyrics serenading his rapt audiences — and the twitter feed, which I never read. Just the first glimpse of ‘the driver’s face’ let me know we were up against a serious psycho. The eyes said it all, and the hair just ramified my first impression. There’s no hope for a person who allows himself to look like that to the rest of the world. And very little hope for those who might be idolizing him. And this is not a racist comment. Those eyes, and that face would be a ‘retard’ in any race. His looks alone should have disqualified him from even getting a driver’s license in any state.
If a Miami bath-salted samir shabazz skin-bleached and let his scuzzy hair decay on an island for 4 years. Still, it and Wilson are more coherent and less hated than biden/mattress harris.
My god. The thing about the recent spate of blm “victims”, they all—both white and black— are the worst lowlife forms of humanity, with serious felony convictions, pedophilia, drug use, while the white men we have lost, the mcmichaels, chauvin and company, rittenhouse put through the ringer, are all people with clean records and good careers, who have served our civilization well for decades. Even young Kyle is a lifeguard.
I posted before I meant to. These new woke 2.0 victims make Michael brown and Trayvon look like saints! I don’t see how a system so inverted in its values can survive.
I read a book once that described this situation in the Soviet Union. The powers that be would intentionally put the most violent, maladjusted, perverse, etc. into position of authority. They knew that such people would defend the system with an enthusiasm unequalled. Any sane society would would execute them or lock them up in a mental hospital so they enforced the party line viciously.
This just in: In 2007, Brooks was convicted of phoning in a bomb threat to a Las Vegas casino: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10235761/Darrell-Brooks-convicted-threatening-bomb-Nevada-casino.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus
So, yeah. Confirmed terrorist.
Recently saw sniffy white middle class Americans madly ranting about the Rittenhouse verdict, saying they wanted to attack Wisconsin because of it. And yet, FUNNILY ENOUGH, they have not said ONE SINGLE WORD about this nightmarish anti-white attack on their yelping platforms.
Is it because the scum involved in this case saved these keyboard warrrior cunts the hassle of having to attack Wisconsin themselves? They don’t seem to realise, with their self-racist self-loathing, in never standing up for themselves, or white people in general, they embolden (in)human shit like Brooks, and are thus complicit in anti-white terrorism which THEY THEMSELVES might fall prey to! They disgust me to my core.
I can just hear Bill Hicks in my head right now ranting at the audience he hated: “FUCKING MORONS! YOU FUCKING…MORONS!”
And the race war-peddling elites fomenting violence to save their own stinking skins are lapping this the fuck up from their lofty media manupulation towers, toasting it all with the most expensive race war-loving champagne that greedy, murderous billionaire scum can buy. Cheers!
This is one point about which I disagree with many in the pro-white community. We must stop ever thinking that our goal is to rescue all or possibly even most whites. Vast hordes of whites are total assholes. They are genetically fouled. I say this because clearly one’s ideological proclivities are heavily (perhaps wholly, for those who can reason about things) genetically determined. I grew up in a conservative home (though one not genuinely racist, except by the Far Wokester’s bogus and self-interested definition of “racist”), but in a very leftist area, with considerable educational leftist indoctrination (yes, despite being 60; it’s worse today, of course, but, speaking racially, it was bad in the 1960s/70s, etc, too). I have never been anything but Hard Right, especially on something so visceral and obvious as racial differentiation. I don’t think I ever could have been a liberal.
Our race is astronomically weaker because of the liberal presence among us. Whites don’t need ‘numbers’ so much as quality and sovereignty. Out of 170 million whites, perhaps 50 mil (some secularist, some Christian) are hardcore, auto-genocidal, race self-abnegationists, and perhaps another 50 million are morally upstanding but perpetually confused reality-denialists. These “objective but not subjective” whites massively reduce the collective survival prospects of the perhaps 70 million of us who are ethnopsychologically normal race (and self) preservationists. Who could deny that a numerically smaller white America in which Greg Johnson defines the Far Right, and someone like a Rand Paul or Kevin McCarthy defines the Far (liberal) Left, would be far stronger and better able to face down all external racial enemies than the present, entire 170 million of us yoked together in this dying country?
Normal whites (not just the racially awakened) are now a viciously preyed upon and persecuted minority group in America (and soon in every nation, as well as planet-wide). We redpilled whites desperately need to start thinking of ourselves in this light, and convincing other normal but not yet awakened whites to do the same.
I’ll have to disagree on that. Both of my parents are leftists. That doesn’t mean that I have to be a pinko. None of my grandparents were all that ideological, at least enough to talk about it. What happened is that my parents got affected by all the propaganda directed at the young Boomers. I have the same genes, but somehow I saw through all the propaganda. Today’s wokesters are horrible, but that’s because they’ve been brainwashed.
But there is substantial evidence for both the genetics of ideology formation (there was a major book on this a decade or so ago, I think from Prometheus Press), and, less biologically deterministically, the huge role that parents do in fact play in determining how their children turn out in terms of political preference. I have read many times that children disproportionately adopt the ideologies of their parents. Sure you can show lots of exceptions, but for statistically large aggregates, this is true. Why else do you think progressive areas and conservative ones tend to reproduce themselves geographically over time? Why is New England perpetually liberal? Unlike many formerly ‘red’ (Virginia, Nevada), or ‘purple’ (CA) – states that have become more ‘blue’ mainly due to migration (VA’s Youngkin bucked the general trend in VA; let’s hope his victory can be replicated elsewhere, but it doesn’t invalidate the general ‘blue’ trend in VA corresponding to “changing demographics”) – New England has not experienced such rapid and significant demographic changes (except just maybe Vermont, flooded with too many NYC (((socialists)))). Yet there MA and CT and RI remain, just neverendingly liberal.
What part genetics vs upbringing plays in adult ideological formation (and they’re clearly intertwined) is obviously complex and probably still not fully understood. My larger point, however, was to question the old liberal, later conservative, canard about the value of “education” in changing minds. It’s real, but perhaps more limited than hitherto assumed. I have encountered many, many leftists whom I have gently and patiently demolished in argument, but who cling to their beliefs – especially on verboten topics like race and feminism.
WNs need to focus our limited resources on saving those who want to be saved. I have redpilled a number of conservatives in my time; never a liberal. W.F. Buckley long ago once quoted from the nuclear war theorist Hermann Kahn to the effect that one can only change another’s ideological preference by a small degree. On a 10 point scale, if AOC is a 1 and I’m a 10, you might be able to move AOC to position 2 or 3 via ratiocination and debate, but that’s it. Me, you might be able to get me to be a 9 or 8. That’s what I mean by ideology being genetically (perhaps we can use the more neutral term “innately”) determined (or maybe just “determined” by itself). We are not our parents; we arise out of their genes. Most conservative parents produce adult conservatives; vice versa for progressives. There are always exceptions.
Ethnostatist advocacy must aim at corralling racially pure, already rightist whites (and then further redpilling them). Our analyses should be done in light of our outreach. This is why I am always so opposed to WN anti-Christianism, despite my own agnosticism. I see vast numbers of white Christian conservatives as a big part of our target audience (ie, of those who could be persuaded of the need for an ethnostate to protect our people and, especially, descendants). Trying to reach out to ‘abnormals’ (which is what I think leftists today are) is a waste of scarce resources.
Has BLM make a statement condemning the attack? I won’t hold my breath, but will they double down – you can be sure of that. Here is a latest Yahoo article.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/kyle-rittenhouse-proof-white-women-183033289.html
The fact the article is published by Yahoo just goes to show you the entire system is in the approval of the “racial reckoning”. Do they really want to start something – where minorities will NOT fare well? Her statement on “child birth between black and white” might come to fruition after all.
Since I view the entire process in the U.S. through the lens of my former country, Ex-Yugoslavia, where similarities are unmistakable, and all of this reminds me of the war in Bosnia. The Muslims initially agreed upon the long-term deal on collectively running Bosnia with their counterparts Croats and the Serbs. The Americans urged them to reject the proposal by telling them they can have a better deal: “They could have and rule the entire Bosnia.” They got greedy they rejected the deal on the urge of the Americans, they overplayed their hands and they paid the heavy price.
I am afraid I am seeing Blacks overplaying their hands.
Best wishes!
I don’t know if you noticed, but the article isn’t original to Yahoo. They often repost articles from other sources (often The Guardian, a joke paper if ever there was one). In this case it’s from some site called ‘MadameNoire.’ You can guess what the site is about just by that name. Glanced at the description on Google. Clearly a middle class black supremacist hatefest outlet. What a surprise. Though yes, I suppose Yahoo did publish it in reposting it. They do publish a lot of total shit there.
A CBS headline on victim Jane Kulich:
Husband of Waukesha parade victim learned of her cancer diagnosis after she died: “Maybe God took her so she didn’t have to suffer”
IT WAS AN ACT OF MERCY! The ape ran her down in cold blood so she WAS SPARED A BATTLE WITH CANCER! I’ve never been so livid.
That is beyond disgusting. How does this traumatised, grieving man’s delusional mercy killing scenario help the grieving loved ones of the five other people in the racial massacre? Maybe the eight-year-old was killed so he was spared having to grow up in a racist state that hates his skin colour? Maybe ‘god’ took the lives of the arseholes in the Rittenhouse case so that more innocent children didn’t have to be raped, or more people didn’t need to be burgled! Would say it’s unbelievable, but tragically, by this stage in the sick racist game…it totally is not.
I’m rooting for the ambulance-chasers. Go back and go after everyone responsible for him being free to do what he did.
I don’t know if this is verifiable due to the intended anonymity of the jurors, but I wonder if some of the victims in Waukesha are related to the Kenosha jurors.
CC is fortunate to have Jim Goad as a contributor. His prose is always highly entertaining, and he’s expert at exposing the fraud behind the dominant moral system of the West.
Would it be considered “extremist” if I suggest we bring back lynching? Anyway, it’s just a thought. I apologize for the bad optics.
It is fedposting, which we don’t allow.
However, you can at least say that you understand why men who saw travesties of justice take the law into their own hands.
For pity’s sake. Whoever tried to bail this vermin out needs… (insert your own punishment)
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/wisconsin-parade-news-latest-darrell-030427049.html
Milwaukee DA John Chisholm is on record as saying he knows his bail reforms would result in death, but is worth it in spite of that. If there is one specific name besides the perp on whom this tragedy can be pinned it is Chisholm.
Some news outlets have been floating the rumor that Biden is going to pardon Darrell Brooks, and give him the Medal Of Freedom. Biden’s closest advisors wanted to give Brooks the Medal Of Honor, but they were advised that the Medal Of Freedom is the highest award a civilian can be awarded. Anyways, the Justice Department has been putting in a lot of late hours in order to expedite Brooks’ release. The Justice Department even had a couple lawyers working through Thanksgiving–no turkey for them, justice must be done, though the heavens fall.
Do you really believe that they are trying to expedite his release and then give him the medal of freedom??? That is just absurd, even for this administration.
This is ridiculous even for the cigar store Indian president. Please provide a source for this medal of freedom bidness rather than rely on rumor.
The timing of the “guilty” verdicts in Georgia is pure evil like the Saddam Hussein execution date. Designed specifically to incite specific people. Deliberately done to take the heat off the dreadlocked demon who deliberately slaughtered Christian women and children, off the Rittenhouse self-defense now go meet Trump celebration, and it’s put right back onto the always “guilty” white men (so evil, so racist, so white) a day before our little national genocide day. That race war? It’s so fukkin on. Tragically most whites are way too scared to go get in the fight because they know their enemies (BLM and Antifa terrorists) are out there (already in the fight) waiting for them with instructions to maim and kill from those who will get them out of jail and keep the media from reporting too heavily on their crimes against humanity.
“The timing of the “guilty” verdicts in Georgia is pure evil like the Saddam Hussein execution date. Designed specifically to incite specific people. Deliberately done to take the heat off the dreadlocked demon…”
These sort of comments demonstrate exactly what I’m talking about regarding confirmation-bias-driven mind-reading. The Arbery trial had finished its course and went to the jury on Tuesday. To pretend as if they purposely stretched the trial out waiting for Darrell Brooks to run over dozens of white people in Wisconsin presupposes they knew the Waukesha Massacre was going to happen and “deliberately…designed” the course of the trial to end when it did. It also presupposes that the prosecution and judge were also mind-readers and knew what verdicts the jury was going to deliver.
It’s all so dumb and embarrassing and superstitious and illogical. I suppose it’s no coincidence that it comes from someone who also uses terms such as “pure evil” and “demons.”
My point will fly way over the heads of the serial mind-readers, but I hope at least some people understand what I’m getting at here.
“That race war? It’s so fukkin on.”
That comment? It’s the sort of sentiment that people such as Darrell Brooks would habitually post. It’s the sort of fedposting that just led to a $26-million judgment against the defendants in Charlottesville. It’s illegal to advocate violence on the internet. Maybe your intent was to bankrupt this site. I don’t know. Can’t say for sure. I’M NOT A MIND-READER.
Completely agree with you on the foolishness and/or use of words in the comment above. Not sure if you can answer this question, though I do have to ask how this comment made the cut? Is it simply because this individual is behind the “paywall?” Currently, I cannot afford to be a privileged member of this site. I have had quite a few comments censored and unpublished and they were far from inciteful or threatening. Is the ability to have some comments published and some not so arbitrary?
I delete your comments when they contain gutter vulgarity.
Hahaha!!!! Guess I will have to keep that in mind for the future. I was under the impression that this site promoted free speech, my bad. I understand that this is your site and I will respect your position, but aren’t there 7 billion different interpretations of what vulgarity is or is not? I have read some comments that I would consider “gutter vulgarity” but I truly believe that particular individual has that right and it is good for the conversation as a whole. Again, I get that you have control over your site and if you don’t like something you have the absolute right to not publish. I just don’t believe that is true promotion of free speech, at all. I do appreciate and thank you though for clarifying your process and standards. While I have the chance, I also want to thank you, Jim Goad and all the writers on this site for all of the great work, and the platform for the exchange of Ideas and conversation.
How is merely opining that a race war is happening illegally advocating violence over the internet? People have been talking on the internet about the “War on Whites” for maybe two decades. Stating that violence or war is already going on is hardly logically (or, I would have thought, legally) equivalent to advocating violence or something illegal (unless free speech as applied to internet cases is different from its application to the spoken word). Moreover, even if Mr. Freeman were advocating a race war, does that actually meet the threshold of illegality? I really don’t know. I thought the type of online advocacy of violence that is illegal consists in making specific threats. If someone advocates burning down a Federal courthouse (as antifa routinely do – and try to do in real life), that could be seen as an incitement to violence that would be criminally actionable. But is it also illegal to say something like “Portland ought to just be nuked”, which is merely an opinion?
If you or others have investigated this matter formally, please share what you know. Maybe you could do a column on the subject of what’s not legal to say online. That would be very helpful. Might even get widely noted and shared. I’d like to be educated on the topic. I was honestly under the impression that only specific threats (eg, some guy posts that he wants to kill somebody) were actually actionable.
As I implied in my previous comment, in the Sines v. Kessler trial where the defendants are now liable for about $26 million, this simple Discord post by Jason Kessler was used as evidence of a conspiracy to commit violence:
“I would go to the ends of the earth to secure a future for my people,” he said in a May 20, 2017, Discord post. “This is war.”
Not saying it’s fair or makes sense, but that’s the environment right now. Adding “It’s so fukkin on” is not only wigger-speak, it seems to be a way of saying “bring it on.”
The “race war” as some people on this site seem to think of as a fairly recent phenomena, has actually been going on for thousands of years. The jewish calendar goes back six thousand years. I am an old school racist, I imbibed my education from the likes of Revilo P. Oliver, William L. Pierce, Kevin Alfred Strom, William Galey Simpson, David Duke and George Lincoln Rockwell. My favorite site is counter-currents, all respect, and kudos to Mr. Greg Johnson for an exemplary job.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.