3,013 words
By the time I heard about the cancelation of the BreadTuber known as Socialism Done Left, the controversy was already a few days old. I had never heard of the guy, but when I stumbled upon the Vice article “Leaked Racist Messages Shows “Leftist” Youtuber Isn’t” written by affirmative action hire Gita Jackson, I initially wanted to defend him.
Gita Jackson
Socialism Done Left is a YouTuber who makes socialist explainer videos, sort of like Socialism 101. Like many BreadTubers, he spent a lot of time in Destiny’s discord server. Well, some of his posts there from 2019 and 2020 have resurfaced, where he was making some edgy racist humor.
Stuff like this:
Socialism Done Left’s most recent video was “Capitalism Versus Socialism,” a debate between him and J. F. Gariepy. This made me want to like him even more. I have a degree of respect for anyone who has the balls to engage with us, even a degenerate Jew like Destiny.
My first impression of SDL was one of a based Leftist having his life ruined for making edgy jokes. I wanted to defend the guy, or even reach out to him to reassure him that it’s not the end of the world. The SJWs will never forgive him, but we don’t give a shit about racist jokes.
There are ways for a Leftist to build an audience on the Right without compromising their principles. People like Sean McCarthy, Aimee Terese, and the Red Scare girls have built up cult followings on the Right. Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi are fairly respected on our side.
Whenever I see someone being raked over the coals by the woke mob, my natural instinct is to defend them. Hell, I once defended the pro-hedonism Jewish feminists of the Guys We Fucked podcast when they were under attack by the wokesters.
But then I dug a little deeper into this Socialism Done Left character. That’s when I put down my sword and shield and picked up a tub of popcorn. There will be no white-knighting today. No siree, Bob. I’m here to gloat.
Now we are going to descend into the hellscape known as BreadTube.
Try not to touch anything while we are down here.
I’ve written quite a bit about the Podcast Left AKA the Dirtbag Left AKA the Unwoke Left. The YouTube Left, AKA BreadTube, is a different animal.
They are all commies, but BreadTube is more woke and much more degenerate. The Dirtbag Left is mostly concerned with class critique and tends to be skeptical of wokeness, which they think undermines working-class solidarity. BreadTube, on the other hand, are hardcore feminists, gender pronouns in the profile, the whole bit, and disproportionately obsessed with trans issues given their percentage of the population.
There is also a big difference in how they approach white nationalism. The Dirtbag Left may be anti-white nationalism but it’s not an issue that animates them. Many think that white nationalism is a moral panic being used by the establishment to advance their neoliberal agenda. Dirtbag Lefties look at white nationalists as a fringe movement with no real power and little public support, who are fighting a lost cause.
I’ve heard Matt Christman argue that the neoliberal establishment has created conditions of economic uncertainty, causing people to rally around what is most familiar to them: their own tribe. So while white nationalism is “bad m’kay,” the blame for its modern incarnation ultimately lies with the establishment. That’s a much more sympathetic appraisal than we usually hear, which is that we are just straight-up evil.
With BreadTube, anti-white nationalism and anti-anti-SJW is a central theme. A lot of BreadTubers built their following producing videos “debunking” white nationalist and anti-SJW talking points. They fancy themselves expert de-radicalizers.
So, Socialism Done Left. . . is a serious race traitor. His Twitter is full of anti-race realism shit.
And he’s retweeting Jared fucking Holt.
Now, this is after he was canceled by the woke mob. Jared Holt does for a living what is being done to Socialism Done Left right now and he’s retweeting the guy.
Then there was his response video, which was lame. Total capitulation to the mob. He cucks on everything, throws himself at the mercy of the crowd, and doubles down on the wokeness. He pledged the stream’s donations to a trans rights charity and made anti-race realist arguments in the middle of it for no apparent reason.
I wanted to feel sorry for him. But at this point? Yeah, fuck this guy.
The woke mob apparently agreed, and the stream was ratio’d into oblivion.
The woke mob responded to the apology exactly as you would expect them to. SJWs don’t do forgiveness.
Indie
The delicious part about this controversy is that the person who dug up all of Socialism Done Left’s 2-year-old messages was this black bitch who goes by the name of Indie on Twitter.
If the word “uppity” did not exist, it would have to be invented just to describe her. All she does is tone police other Leftists, accusing them of being racist, transphobic, or otherwise problematic.
She is also viciously anti-white.
But hey, it’s cool because. . .
It’s hilarious to me that Socialism Done Left committed himself to defending POC while attacking his own people, and this is the thanks he gets. Despite being only 13% of the population, blacks are 100% of the people responsible for ruining Socialism Done Left’s life.
I honestly don’t understand people who aren’t racist.
There are a few videos on Socialism Done Left’s YouTube channel where he defended Jews (see here, here, and here).
Well, how’s that working out for you, buddy? Maybe you can call up some of your Jewish pals and say “Hey, I went to bat for you guys. You think you could do me a solid and return the favor in my time of need?” Let me know how much gratitude your Jewish pals show you for being a race traitor, big guy.
If you polled Jews on who their favorite gentile was, Oskar Schindler would be near the top of that list, if not #1 — and he died in poverty. The dude blew through a million dollars and risked execution to protect Jews. Whatever your beliefs about the Holocaust, Jews themselves sincerely believe that Oskar Schindler saved the lives of 1,200 Jews. And how did the wealthiest ethnic group in the world thank him? They stood back and let that guy starve.
Oh, wait. There was one Jew who came to his defense, but only after first trying to ruin his life. This will take some explaining.
The racism angle is only one part of this controversy. There are also claims that Socialism Done Left is a sex pest who was particularly aggressive with trans women. Allegedly, he was banned from Destiny’s discord server for that reason.
The mod log from Destiny’s server:
You also have this character, who made some pretty heavy accusations against Socialism Done Left.
The DM:
They continue. . . .
Obviously, I don’t give a shit about the racism stuff. If it were just the racism stuff and Socialism Done Left wanted to defect to the Right, I could even forgive his past as a race traitor. It would be a massive propaganda coup to steal one of BreadTube’s guys. But now we’re getting into liability territory.
Here’s where we get into the Jewish angle. There’s a Jewish trans-girl that Socialism Done Left was chummy with. Apparently, this creature goes by the name Rat. Yeah, I know. A Jew named Rat. Talk about owning the insult.
Anyway, they’ve nuked their Twitter account, but they used to be @Oweeowowow or “Could Be Dumber.”
Hey, I don’t like looking at this shit any more than you do. I’m a journalist and it’s relevant to the story. After I finish writing this, I’m going to have to take a 10-hour shower.
Sigh. . . I swear, the things I do for the white race. . . I better get a statue dedicated to me in the ethnostate. After this article, I’d say I’ve earned it.
So let’s finish this thread.
This is relevant because these two would eventually try to deny this ever happened.
Rat also acknowledges his trans fetish:
Whatever.
So, Socialism Done Left made the mistake of trusting a Jew. Rat may be all playfully and bantery with him here, but behind his back, Rat is DMing people stuff like this:
Rat additionally leaks a bunch of DMs from Socialism Done Left, which got shared all over the place. But after this whole controversy breaks out, Rat switches gears.
The Jew then posts this message.
I feel my IQ dropping as I write this.
This t-girl betrays her friend by leaking a bunch of private DMs, which is a pretty Jewish thing to do. When the shit hits the fan, the Jew starts making up some ridiculous lies to cover up for her friend, which is a pretty Jewish thing to do. What the Jew says really happened is that they fabricated fake DMs to try to fuck with their friend’s life, which if true, would be a pretty Jewish thing to do.
I don’t understand people who aren’t anti-Semites.
Socialism Done Left dedicates his life to being an anti-white nationalist race traitor, and is brought down by a black bitch and a Jew that he made the mistake of trusting.
Whatever anyone wants to say about racism — that it’s wrong, that it’s irrational, that it’s low-status — the fact is that racism makes accurate predictions. Race deniers can find all sorts of fancypants ways to explain why things played out the way they did ex post facto. But race deniers consistently fail to make accurate predictions of the future.
If you take a society and inject X number of Race Y into that society, a racist can accurately predict certain changes in that society. On the other hand, any scheme or plan that has ever used racial equality as one of its baseline assumptions has consistently failed to deliver the results it promised. Desegregation, affirmative action, forced bussing, you name it. None of those did what it said on the tin.
Who made the more accurate predictions of what would happen if segregation was ended: the segregationists or the anti-segregationists? Clearly, it was the segregationists. Crime did go up, blacks didn’t rise to socioeconomic parity with whites, communities did go to shit (have you seen what Selma looks like today?).
Race deniers rely on explanations like systemic racism, white privilege, stereotype threat — take your pick. But crucially, that’s not what they predicted. They predicted that affirmative action would only be necessary for 20 years, and that blacks would achieve socioeconomic parity within a generation. Why didn’t they factor X, Y, and Z into their predictions?
Both racists and race deniers can produce their data and argue until the cows come home. The ultimate test is not which model has better explanatory power, but which one has more predictive power. Clearly, it’s racism. Every time. Racism is a constant morphine drip of confirmation bias.
If Socialism Done Left had asked us, we could have told him where getting involved with a Jew would lead to. This mess he is in was predictable. But because “race is a social construct,” he got Jewed in the most stereotypically Jewish ways.
I digress.
Now, Socialism Done Left’s defense throughout this is that his racist statements were edgy jokes, that he is not racist, and that he was actually satirizing Right-wingers. I was initially willing to believe this.
And yet. . . .
This is interesting. Socialism Done Left posted a few videos trying to debunk Jewish Bolshevism (here and here). I have no opinion on the subject. I’ve heard different arguments from people whose intelligence I respect.
What I do know is that, contrary to what Socialism Done Left says, the idea that the Bolshevik was fundamentally Jewish was not something invented by Nazis. White Russians who were there said so. Winston Churchill believed it was. It was a fairly common belief even among non-anti-Semites.
Secondly, saying that “Only X% of the Y was Jewish” is not entirely sufficient to debunk the claim. There may be 100 people in the Senate, but they are not all equally influential. Mitt Romney has a lot more pull than Jon Tester. Banging out statistics doesn’t tell you who the real movers and shakers were. Whatever. That’s beside the point.
What’s interesting is that once this controversy broke out, people went through his publicly posted folder of research documents and found that Socialism Done Left had accumulated data that contradicted the arguments he had made.
He also accumulated data about blacks supporting the 1994 crime bill, which blacks nowadays claim was a white supremacist conspiracy against them. This is a Right-wing talking point, so it is weird that a Leftist would have assembled data on this.
And our friend Indie, who started this whole fiasco, claims she received this message from one of Socialism Done Left’s alt accounts, which I can not confirm is true.
Now if that is an SDL alt account, that might lend some credibility to the claim that he is genuinely racist. And if he were genuinely racist, that would make him a self-conscious fraud. At minimum, it means he secretly knows that white nationalists have more legitimate grievances than he is willing to admit. He’s calling some guy an idiot for saying the Soviet Union was top-heavy with Jews, while his own research contradicts some of the arguments he was making.
Here’s where the story takes another twist.
Once the controversy heated up, Socialism Done Left got doxed and some of the details were interesting, to say the least. It turns out our boy is a trust fund kid. No surprise there. Show me a socialist who isn’t. The guy is so bougie that he even has a double-barreled surname.
While it has since been edited out, the original Vice article contained the full dox.
Word on the street has it that Richard Bissell Jr. was not Socialism Done Left’s grandfather, but his grandfather’s brother. His actual grandfather was this guy, William Bissell, who was a lead engineer for Lockheed Martin.
Wikipedia claims (granted, without citation) that his grandpa was a member of Skull and Bones at Yale.
So Aiden is swimming in blood money. And being the grandson of a guy who tried to overthrow a communist government can’t do many favors for one’s Lefty cred.
But how relevant is that? He can’t help who his family is, and it’s not fair to punish someone for his father. However, one could argue that if a guy is going to talk about politics, he has an obligation to disclose his political connections so people can take that into account when evaluating his arguments. Eh. Maybe. I think if he was advocating for war, then yeah, he should probably mention that his family works in defense contracting and benefits from war. I am not aware of him doing that.
A stronger argument might be that if Socialism Done Left wants to advocate for the working class (which he does do), he has an obligation to disclose his own class status. How much could he possibly relate to working-class people? Does he have any real experience interacting with honest-to-God working-class people, or is “the working class” just an abstract political concept to him? These are things that working-class people might want to know about their advocates.
And of course, some might say — not without good reason — that any connection to the CIA, no matter how tangential, a priori makes someone untrustworthy.
But then I found this tweet.
If he’s going to say stuff like this, then he should probably disclose his connections to the Military-Industrial Complex. I can cut him some slack because he was anon and had to maintain opsec. But if that’s the case, he should avoid subjects with conflicts of interest.
Now, some BreadTubers have come to Socialism Done Left’s defense.
Vaush did, sort of. Rather, he declined to denounce him because it would be hypocritical to denounce another YouTuber for degeneracy. Part of me wants to give him credit for honesty, but the other part is thinking that hypocrisy has its merits.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTp_5u3-x5A
Vaush’s degeneracy is well-documented and comparable to Socialism Done Left’s. However, Vaush has enough clout and a big enough audience to weather controversies like this much easier than a smaller channel like Socialism Done Left can.
There is also this BreadTuber named Merrick Deville, who really went to the mat for Socialism Done Left.
I don’t know if Merrick Deville is trans or not. You can never be sure these days, and in the land of BreadTube, nothing is ever what it seems. I’m pretty sure that she’s not actually French. She culturally appropriated her surname from my people. Look, Merrick, if you are going to be a degenerate commie, could you at least not LARP as a Frenchman while doing it?
Now that I think about it, the name “Socialism Done Left” is culturally appropriating proletarian manners of speaking. Typical bourgeois elitist move! Elites like Socialism Done Left steal the culture of the streets, water it down, sugar it up, and then sell it right back to us.
Enjoy your new life, Aiden. You should have listened to the Nazis. If you had, you wouldn’t be in this mess. You might be in a different mess, but you would at least have the support of a community.
POC hate you because you’re racist.
Racists hate you because you’re a traitor.
The wages of race treachery is cancelation.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
12 comments
He has an extremely punchable face.
Glad someone on our side, in this case Travis the B, is keeping tabs on our enemies, but otherwise, who cares about these scum? Humorous piece, but we need to build up ourselves and our race preservationist movement from the inside out, rather than pathetically hoping for very many dramatic ideological conversions. Be strong, traditional values role models in our own lives, while always pushing racial awakening among brain-washed whites where possible. That’s the ticket to success.
First, recognize what types of whites are reachable. I have argued that it is conservatives, or at least politically apathetic whites, with whom we’ll have the best chances at conversions to race realism (I am so, so tempted to add “Duh!”, but apparently, among white nationalists, I am learning, there is a sizable, though I hope minority, contingent who really seem to think that some fruitcake with an earring and lots of ‘tats’, who denounces capitalism {because he’s made a disciplined study of real economics … {lol}} and maybe expresses a tiny positive sentiment about, oh, celtic druidism or some other vital concern {lol}, is a better prospect around whom to build a real political movement, than the solid white citizens at church or the gun range or the Rotary club). I say, NEVER TRUST A LEFTIST! Of any kind. They are unstable mentally, and will betray you eventually.
The White Right should be constantly making overtures to the non-Racial Right, rather than ever wasting its time (let alone compromising its ideology) trying to win over wobbly leftists.
Second, the best way to reach the greatest number of our potentially race-realistic people, is to be and appear to be normal, not by today’s debased and self-destructive standards, of course, but neither by the superior standards of ancient Rome, or Victorian Britain, or the Third Reich, either. The standard of white American normality (again, I emphasize, among and for the benefit of potential prowhite converts from race-denialist brainwashing) remains the 1950s. The American ’50s were hardly the greatest age of white character, of course, but they were the last time a majority of white Americans were still ‘solid’ in outlook and attitude and proper masculinity (and femininity). White Americans who are not committed racio-Marxists can still relate to the clean-cut denizens of that period.
Jared Taylor is still the exemplar in this regard. He looks and sounds normal to non-leftist whites. His lack of personal idiosyncrasies properly draws the reader’s or listener’s attention to his true, reasonable and well-presented ideas. Never underestimate people’s unideological prejudices, especially when one is presenting dissident ideas.
I hear you. The purpose of writing this article was to highlight for any normies out there that being a race traitor does not pay. Socialism Done Left was stabbed in the back by the people he dedicated his life to defending. POC have no honor, no gratitude, they don’t see white race traitors as “one of the good ones”, you gain nothing by going down that road.
One thing I like to say to Leftists is “The average POC make less distinction between guys like you and guys like me than you would think.” This episode is a beautiful example of that. I am an open and unapologetic white nationalist. Socialism Done Left is race-cucked commie. And yet POC are now treating him as if he were no different than me.
POC have more respect for people like me than they do people like Socialism Done Left because POC know where they stand with me. But with people like Socialism Done Left, they don’t know if he is really down for The Cause or if he is just trying to impress other white people. But with me, there is no confusion.
Don’t get me wrong. POC hate both me and him. But they respect me more.
By the way, for what it’s worth, the Nazis had a lot of success recruiting communists. If you look at 1920’s and 1930’s Germany and look at what parties were losing support while the Nazis were gaining support, the biggest losers were the Socialist Democratic Party who declined in support in almost exact proportion to the Nazis gaining support.
Ryan Faulk has a good video on this:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/P4AzOWiG7YlD/
While we are on the subject of Ryan Faulk, there is something that I would like to get off my chest.
Of all the things that I have ever written for Counter-Currents, this article I wrote about Ryan Faulk is the one I regret the most.
https://counter-currents.com/2018/09/the-creature-from-the-black-pill/
It’s not that I disagree with the arguments I made in that article. I still think a lot of the things Ryan was saying at the time were bonkers. My remorse is for two reasons. First, it felt like I was kicking a man when he was down. Second, the article immediately before that was an interview I did with Ryan Faulk. So it’s like he did me a favor by agreeing to do the interview and then I just turned around and blasted on him.
Those were both things that I considered at the time. The reason I decided to write that article anyway were twofold. First, as much as people were freaking about about Ryan’s abandoning white nationalism, no one was actually addressing the arguments that he was making, a lot of which I thought were flawed. Secondly, that episode was extremely blackpilling for a lot people. For the sake of movement morale, I wanted to do a light-hearted, humorous, and non-hysterical article about the controversy.
Anyway, I think my heart was in the right place and I tried to pull my punches. On top of this, I didn’t think Ryan would care all that much. At the time, Faulk was then feuding with Richard Spencer and JF Gariépy who were two scene big shots. Next to them, I was an insignificant gnat. But I’ve heard that Ryan was quite upset by my article and that made me sad.
Ryan Faulk is still one of my favorite people in this scene. He is one the most original and interesting persons in the game. Is Ryan Faulk an asshole? Yeah, probably but if I were as talented as Ryan Faulk, I would probably be an asshole too. I mean, what are you going to do? Not pay attention?
And to be perfectly honest, Ryan has been partially exonerated. Nick Fuentes’ Groyper movement is somewhat similar to the kind of movement that Ryan was advocating for: a race conscious conservatism that is open to non-whites but does not pander to them. There are still problems with his proposed quasi-ethnostate but in terms of political strategy, Fuentes has proven that Faulk’s premise is workable.
This is totally off-topic but I have spent the last three years feeling like the biggest asshole in the world and I feel a moral obligation to put this on the public record.
Ryan, if you are reading this, I am sorry.
“By the way, for what it’s worth, the Nazis had a lot of success recruiting communists. If you look at 1920’s and 1930’s Germany and look at what parties were losing support while the Nazis were gaining support, the biggest losers were the Socialist Democratic Party who declined in support in almost exact proportion to the Nazis gaining support.”
I know this. You are correct. But think why, and then contrast to our current situation. Basically – and I will take heat for this – scum gravitate to scum, as well as to the margins. Both Nazis and Commies were bullies. Conservatives (like me), who used to be racialists, too, properly recognized that the Nazis and Fascists were ‘their’ scum; the commies, the true enemies. But that doesn’t mean that most Nazis were of the same moral quality as Germany’s solid Christian citizens.
Let me start over. Every society, including white ones, has a certain number of bullies, sadists, sociopaths, etc. The West is so horrific today (as my grandparents were already thinking in the 1970/80s when they died) because we have integrated ourselves with races who are massively morally inferior to us, which contain so many more sociopaths, bullies, etc, than we do. But that doesn’t mean that we don’t produce our own, too. In a time of civil society breakdown, the toughest, loudest, most organized and most aggressive groups will tend to have the most sway. They will attract a disproportionate share of society’s set of sadists because at bottom, sadists care about their ability to satisfy themselves, not making sacrifices for “principle” (whether noble or repellent).
Thus, while some scum would have been hypernationalistic and prejudiced, and thus been attracted to the Nazis, other scum, for whatever far sicker psychological reasons, would have been attracted to the commies (and this is still an issue today: look at how many “mattoids” and sociopaths and bullies and sheer perverts and creeps make up the antifa, a huge number of whom, let us admit, are white – so clearly we’re dealing with some continuously reproducing genetic defect involving a not inconsiderable number of our own people). However, if the key aspect of a sadist is sadism, not really ideology, then we should expect it to be rather (psychologically) easy for one group of sadists to switch to another group, even if the superficial ideologies of both are radically different. What the sadist wants primarily is an outlet for his sadism. Because he is a bad person without principles or scruples, he will always attempt to attach himself to whichever side has the power – and especially, can employ him in ways which utilize his sadism.
Just as most blacks who mouth BLM slogans are really just out for looting and mayhem and racial powermongering, so, too, are most of those whites associated with antifa simply out for themselves. They perceive, perhaps correctly (though let us hope ultimately incorrectly), that the power in our cesspool society today rests with the Left + black/POC alliance, and that they can better effectuate their nihilistic psychopathy and pleasurable anarcho-hooliganism under the rhetorical cover of “anti-fascism”, which will win them (((media))) approval and Democrat party support.
But whether this is a good or bad thing, I truly believe that not only are we the good guys, but that we can only win by appealing to racially ignorant/unawakened good guys. There are some scum who would be attracted to neo-nazism, but outside of our odious prisons, these persons will never have much sway in the larger population (simply because White Americans are such inherently good people – which is why Nazi LARPing is so utterly terrible for the cause of white rights and preservation). Our task is to formulate white nationalism in a way that makes it seem maximally ethical and reasonable (which it is) -to emphasize Justice for Whites as opposed to White Power.
Good comment.
What you talked about is a big reason why I am a big optics hawk. If the movement standard is “anything goes”, you WILL attract sadists and sociopaths.
In the Dissident Right, we deal in painful truths. Now, I consider the fact that our truths are painful to be unfortunate. I don’t like hurting people. If there were a way to advance The Cause without hurting people’s feelings, I would be for that way. But there isn’t. If we wanna make this pro-white omelette, you’ve gotta hurt some feelings.
But back in the glory days of the Alt Right when “anything goes” WAS the movement standard, there were a lot of people who got in the game BECAUSE our ideas were upsetting to people. They LIKED hurting people. They didn’t give a fuck about persuading anyone. Hurting people was the whole point. I do not want those people in our movement. They will always be a net loss. Anyone they might attract (which was usually not very many) would be similarly sadistic. Optics are necessary if for no other reason than to dissuade the sociopaths.
Sure, being edgy can be fun and seeing people get triggered by the truth is frequently hilarious but I would honestly rather live in a world where our ideas were considered normal. As normal as wanting lower taxes or more/less government spending. I never wanted to be a white nationalist. I got into this game because I have an unusually high threshold for social disapproval and that made me uniquely qualified to do this. I felt a moral obligation to get in the game but honestly, I wish I didn’t have to do any of this. But I would not be able to live with myself if I didn’t.
The reason Nazis could recruit communists is because they lived in the same fairly tough world and had the same bread and butter issues. Whereas modern comforts enable woke leftists to live on a different planet, effectively.
What a confused soul. May he join a monastery and take a vow of silence.
The CIA connections and him trashing the “Assad gas attack deniers peddling Russian propaganda” is enough for me.
99% of the time he’s spewing controversial and “edgy” stuff meant to be on the left, and when something important is at stake, like the war in Syria, all of a sudden he’s quite serious about taking the side of … well, Western intelligence, like his entire family.
You know sometimes their kids go into propaganda, which is what this is, and that it is 99% cringe and weird and irrelevant and a turn off is a feature, not a bug, because when they need them they all immediately parrot the official line.
Just like Hasbara, the Israeli version.
The aside on the predictive power of racism was good enough and brief enough that I’m saving it separately for redpilling. Predictive validity is important not only for swaying outsiders, but for reassurance that we are, in fact, “correct” in our views with regards to humanity.
I haven’t read this through, because the posts of twitter nonsense is so depressing. It makes me want to give up on White youth, though I know it is being poisoned by all the racial diatribes against them in this country today, and that White youth is being particularly targeted for destruction and decay. What a morass of unpleasantness this country has become. However, I have saved the post because of the monumentally good work the author has done of gathering facts and figures, and ‘names names’ to research the entirety of the horrid Leftist/Socialist/Communist history that has brought us to this point in the American story, which so greatly affects the White racial story, in which we are all involved. This is a very important post, despite being nearly unreadable for a White senior citizen who has watched the steady denigration of White society for over 60 years — despite the great many accomplishments of Whites which have kept this country upright during that same time. I minored in Russian History in college (majored in Art History), and I think the references here, if completely followed up, would constitute a Masters’ Degree in Russian History and its influences in the world. Avail yourself of this gift.
I, too, find myself astonished by the times I find myself living in. These vile, petty, relentless, self-appointed morality police, in the media and on social media, passing judgement on everyone, unchallenged. Ignorant Black “anointed ones” lording it over all of us, unchallenged. What a graceless and merciless society we live in.
The commenter Lord Shang, above, has written an impressively incisive analysis of an aspect of the very nature of man as a social animal. A must read!
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.