Counter-Currents
Robert F. Kennedy eulogizes Martin Luther King on April 4, 1968
1,406 words
It’s a take as old as time: “our leaders divide us by race to stay in power.”
The take resonates with a lot of Americans. We’re instructed to believe we would all get along if it weren’t for meddling politicians and conniving journalists. Black, white, red, yellow — what’s the real difference to the average Joe? On his own, he’s like Rousseau’s noble savage, completely colorblind and ready to grab a beer with anyone regardless of race. But he only hates or fears others due to pernicious ideas put in his innocent little head by powerful people. Free of this influence, he would accomplish Martin Luther King’s one line that all children are taught to remember.
It’s a nice fantasy. We all know it’s complete bullshit.
Racial differences and tension are natural. Those in power seek to obscure them rather than create or inflame them. The racial strife in our country is the inevitable result of making every color, creed, and kind try to live with one another.
But this delusion carries on. It’s now even a conservative take. NBA commentator Charles Barkley became an instant hero to conservatives when he made this point in a recent on-air rant.
Man, I think most white people and black people are great people. I really believe that in my heart, but I think our system is set up where our politicians, whether they’re Republicans or Democrats, are designed to make us not like each other so they can keep their grasp of money and power. They divide and conquer. . . . Their only job is “Hey, let’s make these people not like each other. We don’t live in their neighborhoods, we all got the money, let’s make the whites and blacks not like each other, let’s make rich people and poor people not like each other, let’s scramble the middle class.” I truly believe that in my heart.
His comments were prompted by a clip of Robert F. Kennedy announcing Martin Luther King’s death in 1968. In the clip, RFK urged his mostly black audience to not hate white people for their crimes against their race. He called for a new understanding between the races that brought them together and avoided racial conflict. Blacks did not heed RFK’s call as they burnt and pillaged several American cities following MLK’s assassination.
But Barkley still finds this a relevant message today. Even though in the RFK case, it’s the politician seeking racial harmony against the people’s wishes. . . which undermines Barkley’s point.
Conservatives were swept away by the Basketball Hall of Famer’s comments. Here was a proud black man calling out the racist Democrats and speaking truth to power. According to conservatives and Barkley, we’re all just human and it’s time to see us as mere individuals — not members of any collective besides the red, white and blue.
It’s no surprise Barkley was the herald of this message. The TV commentator has developed a reputation for occasionally wandering off the plantation. Barkley was once a proud black Republican, but has since stated he’s an independent. He frequently criticizes other blacks for criminality, riots, and refusing to adopt white standards. He’s needled Black Lives Matter for trivializing issues and mocked hate hoaxers such as Jussie Smollett. He even defended the police in the Breonna Taylor shooting.
He may have a personal reason for people to not see race. Barkley is married to a white woman and has a mixed-race daughter. White and black aren’t divided in his house.
Barkley’s ascent to conservative herodom is notable considering his reputation as a player. He was a loudmouth trash talker who famously declared “I am not a role model” for a Nike ad. He was the antithesis to the squeaky clean image of Michael Jordan. Now he’s one of the few sports commentators to not traffic in Left-wing propaganda.
You can buy It’s Okay to Be White: The Best of Greg Johnson here.
While it is refreshing for a sports commentator — a black commentator especially — to veer from unremitting anti-white racism, the counter vision is plain silly. Politicians, corporations, and other powerful forces would prefer if race didn’t exist and everyone got along. The racial appeals of politicians are driven by the grassroots, not the other way around.
Let’s go back to RFK’s time period. In that age, all politicians with the exception of the South believed all the races could get along with one another. They supported the Civil Rights Act, the Fair Housing Act, and the Immigration Act on this premise. The lone exception came from the South, but these politicians were not directing the region to oppose multiracialism. Rather, they were responding to their own constituents. Southern leaders were usually less bothered by civil rights than their own voters. Southern Democrats wanted to let the 1957 Civil Rights Act pass without a fight because party leaders told them to do so. They faced an avalanche of constituent correspondence to fight tooth and nail against it. Only one Southern leader heeded the call of his voters: South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond.
By the logic of the divide and conquer take, the Southern leaders would’ve made their voters care about this issue. In reality, it was the reverse.
The same also happened on the other side. Racial violence was opposed by black and liberal leaders. They echoed RFK and MLK’s calls to avoid racialism and hoped their policies would make everyone come together. The politicians didn’t want black rioters attacking whites, but the blacks did it anyway. The politicians hated the Black Panthers, but they organized anyway. And the politicians didn’t want people to see others through race, but the people did it anyway.
We see this now in our own time. The BLM riots weren’t spurred on by politicians, even though politicians and journalists helped fan the flames. Critical race theory training is driven by activists, not politicians. Republican voters do not oppose mass immigration at the behest of GOP lawmakers. It’s because they see the effects of mass immigration in their own communities. Most Republican legislators would rather bring in millions of cheap foreign labor to replace their constituents.
You could say that it’s not politicians but the media behind the latest racial divisions. There is a case to be made there with liberal whites becoming virulently anti-white in recent years. But that doesn’t explain the “reactionary” attitudes of Republican voters, whose views diverge strongly from the media and their representatives.
If racial division is an artificial construct imposed by the elite, then one would expect multiracial communities to flourish. Wrong. Diverse communities are marked by low trust, low engagement, high crime, and poor quality of life. It’s not the politicians telling the people to not get along. They’re not getting along on their own.
Barkley’s vision appeals to bourgeois Americans who can all recall one black, Hispanic, or Asian friend. It gives them a gooey feeling that race doesn’t matter and we’ll eventually get over this turmoil. It’s an awfully appealing delusion.
But while Barkley’s fans may not be interested in race, race is interested in them. Politicians, journalists, entertainers, and other public figures are merely sponges of society. They’re soaking in the racial mess of America and excreting it back out. The more diverse America becomes, the more it resembles Barkley’s nightmare.
The only solution to our racial mess is separation. But that’s not an idea you will hear during an NBA telecast, nor will it get you cheers from Conservative Inc. And it’s certainly not an idea that any politician will entertain. It’s only spoken of in the dark corners of the internet that politicians want to censor.
That’s speaking truth to power.
* * *
On Monday, April 12th, Counter-Currents will be extending special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
As an incentive to act now, everyone who joins the paywall between now and Monday, April 12th will receive a free paperback copy of Greg Johnson’s next book, The Year America Died.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
7 comments
Even if all blacks were good, law abiding citizens that kept to themselves, I wouldn’t want them around–same for the other non-whites.
I disagree. Those in power do create and inflame racial differences and tension AND they also seek to obscure them.
Who reconstructed and passed our current immigration policies under the Hart-Cellar Act? Those in power. I can’t think of anything that more inflamed and created racial differences and tensions in America. They then spent decades obscuring the reality of the outcome.
Politicians do the bidding of the oligarchy. The oligarchy is rabidly anti-White and use any means necessary to promote anti-Whitism. To let the politicians off the hook in this department is ridiculous.
We in the former Yugoslavia couldn’t live together even though there wasn’t any genetic difference except the Albanians from Kosovo. We were all living in relative proximity, yet our historical religious and cultural paths were different. Ignoring those differences and trying to build a cohesive single state is possible but highly unlikely. America is facing multiple crises and those aren’t only race/ethnicity related. Race is just one, highly flammable component, but without dealing with the issue of radical Left Ideology sweeping this country, the race, for now, is only a pretext.
Yes, I hear this all the time. Yet another rationalization that whites put up to avoid confronting the terrifying reality of race, as Sam Francis might put it.
Barkley interviewed Richard Spencer in 2017. I emailed him in this friendly manner and said something like, “Hey Charles, I’ve been looking into this Alt Right business. It’s pretty interesting. But Spencer’s not who you want to talk to. Try Jared Taylor. War Eagle!”
This article touches on a very important point: as sleazy and corrupt as black pols are, most of them are LESS anti-white and criminal-minded than their constituents.
For example, Robert Mugabe may have been a despicable man but he actually resisted seizing white Zimbabwean farmland for over a decade because he knew turning those farms over to low-IQ blacks would wreck the economy.
However, he eventually gave in to pressure from his people.
Likewise the awful ANC avoided stealing land from white South African farmers for a quarter of a century until blacks threatened to leave the party unless they gave in to their demands.
Robert Mugabe may have been a despicable man but he actually resisted seizing white Zimbabwean farmland for over a decade…
Very interesting point.
People are impressed by strength. When Whites ceded power in Rhodesia and then South Africa, they showed weakness. And being weak means that you are no longer protecting the village, clan or kingdom from predators, human or otherwise. Other and stronger peoples move into the vacuum. Someone has to slay that lion and raid the next village’s cattle.
Of course, the Whites in Rhodesia and South Africa (as well as Angola, etc) were in a fairly hopeless situation. They were outnumbered at home, under pervasive sanctions from abroad, and having to fight against a near-endless stream of guerrillas.
Today, we see a similar phenomenon in the Western world where White peoples are ceding borders, cities, memorials and their genetic future. The interesting thing is that White people have the advantage of numbers in their home countries (admittedly diminishing), vastly superior military technology, and a globe spanning economic system. But White nations are under two sanctions: an utterly hostile elite, and an insane egalitarian ideology.
This is something that ought to be considered (but will not be) by conservatives who think they will be saved by a Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell. Regardless of black conservative intentions, what counts are the mass of rank-and-file blacks who are increasingly being radicalized by the militant anti-White ideologues.
This may have been the reason why Donald Trump was able to mobilize minorities beyond the GOP norm. Trump was seen as a stand-up guy, the tribal warrior who could bring back that lion pelt.
A lesson to be learned, whether in the jungles of Africa or those of the Beltway…
Racial Division isn’t a creation of politics, no. But racial division WITHIN races IS. It started with no good Abraham Lincoln who used blacks and slavery as a noble (fake) motive for white men to fight and kill other white men. There were abolitionists who helped push him, but still. To me that was the true beginning of the end. Biden is exactly like Lincoln. For his own power and ego, he’ll throw his fellow white race to the dogs by using blacks and everyone else as an excuse. He’s the worst. He’s lower than the non-whites themselves.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment