575 words
Spanish translation here
Aside from his forceful personality, one possible reason Donald Trump polls better than any other Republican among black and Latino voters — i.e., citizens, not illegal aliens — is that they believe Trump really will build a wall on the Mexican border and deport millions of illegal immigrants, most of them mestizos from Latin America.
Blacks may be dumb, but they aren’t stupid. They see illegal aliens from Latin America taking work and welfare from them. Even Latinos, especially legal immigrants, know that illegal immigration is creating a generalized backlash against all immigrants, a backlash from which they are already suffering due to the widespread assumption that every Latino is here illegally. Moreover, Latinos realize that further immigration undermines their wages and benefits, just as their arrival harmed the economic interests of the Americans who were here before them.
The anti-white Left hopes — and the pro-white Right fears — that non-whites will support more non-white immigration out of racial solidarity and will vote together in an anti-white bloc. But this ignores two factors.
First, the solidarity of non-whites with any and all other non-whites is weaker than their solidarity with their own ethnic groups. For instance, most blacks regard Hispanics as concrete threats to their economic interests rather than potential allies against Whitey. Hispanics also resent the status of blacks as the privileged totemic minority group of white liberals.
Second, the vast majority of immigrants come for economic reasons, and economic migrants share a common profile: they are more rootless, less ethnocentric, and more motivated by material prosperity than those who remain at home. This is one explanation for the low ethnocentrism and racial solidarity of American whites, and the same selection process is at work with non-white immigrants. Thus many immigrants are likely to put their own pocketbooks above racial solidarity if they see immediate, personal benefits to cutting off illegal immigration.
Of course the selection process described above does not apply to blacks, most of whose ancestors came involuntarily, or to Indian tribes indigenous to the United States. But both of these groups still have economic interests in excluding new immigrants. Moreover, Black Americans may feel solidarity with recent black immigrants, but they are a small percentage of immigrants, legal or illegal, and genuinely American Indians are a politically negligible population.
This means there is a basis for creating an “I’ve got mine, buddy” anti-immigration bloc among non-whites, both long-established and recently arrived. Trump can woo these voters precisely because he is an American civic nationalist, not a White Nationalist. If Trump were a White Nationalist, he would encourage non-whites to unite across ethnic and national lines against him. This is probably one reason Trump’s opponents are trying to smear him as a racist. It is not just Jewish neurotics having fits of the Zyklon vapors. There may be a method to their madness.
Although Trump is not a White Nationalist, he can still help our cause. By building a wall and deporting millions of illegal aliens, Trump might be able to postpone for decades white America’s decline into minority status. That would give White Nationalists more time to get our act together, which makes it more likely that we will have a White Republic in North America some day. If Donald Trump can persuade non-whites to help that happen, well, that would be just one of the ironies from which history is made.
12 Comments
I would appreciate more consistency. First you say that fast sudden displacement of whites is better because it is more likely that whites will react to it. In this article you say slower displacement is better because it gives more time for white nationalists to get their shit together.
I think fast displacement is better and what this article describes is nightmare.But Trump has every attribute and quality of white nationalist. He is defender of white interests. Of course he can’t advertise the fact out loud, because that would be end of his presidential bid.
Are you serious? A major point of “waking people up” is to get an immigration ban. Now that an immigration ban is in the offing, do you seriously think that it would be a bad thing, because “worse is better”?
In defense of Greg’s supposed previous stance I would say that what we see as the optimum context for a European ‘awakening’ is based on what appears to be possible in national politics.
For the sake of this example let’s say non-European immigration to the USA 1 million. In this situation there are two potential options.
Option A – Pre Trump – Immigration falls from 1,000,000 to 500,000.
The ‘Great Replacement’ happens at a slower rate so there is less of a shock and political reaction to it.
Option B – Post Trump (hypothetically) Net immigration falls to 100,000 (including a portion of illegals being deported).
The anti-Whites positions of i) tighter immigration controls being impossible to enforce and ii) immigration being critical to economic prosperity are shown to be false.
Pre-Trump Option A appeared to be the ‘best’ anti-immigration policy outcome under the current movers and shakers in politics. As such the ‘worse is better’ position is desirable because it results in a ‘shock’ which forces people into action. However with the success of Trump on paper something along the lines of Option B is now possible so ‘worse is better’ is now no longer the most optimum context.
With Option B you would still have the sizeable consequences of the higher non-White birth rate. However it does away with the ‘old wives tales’ which have influenced sizeable sections of the White public. From this stronger position the White population would then be more likely to become supportive of our position.
I always like to argue we live in under (like a joke) “Liberal Feudalism.”
This is the idea that every “American” has social roles and a narrative to follow.
Whites are guilty, should believe in white privileged…
Blacks are good, should do what they want, a struggle against “racism.”
White women are not like men, should fight for justice, be a mother for everyone else…
(You get it).
Ironically, people believe they are “free” and can do what they want. They believe there is a corporate ladder to climb, social norms to accept, and duties and responsibilities to follow. While at the same time, everyone is a special snowflake fighting against the evil, bad, greedy system that oppresses (which ironically, they work for or are the elite). This is the “Liberalism” that people feel and the “Feudalism” no one can escape. It’s almost like a Hindu caste system, but more in tone with a Medieval Europe in a Post-Postmodern era. Some are knights, some are serfs.
Liberals believe that we have finally started “thinking about thinking,” and their is no future leap after that. But, critics have started to think about thinking about thinking. Liberal Feudalism is falling apart because those who have played the game for the longest time, don’t want to give it away to a new player. Blacks take their slice, Fems that slice, White Liberals hold on to the lie they made.
It’s like how Curt Doolittle said the basis of Western Civilization was based on “Truth.” Whites tell the truth. America is corrupt because it cost to tell the truth. New truths are made, out of the form of a “lie,” and instituted. The Baby boomer generation and Gen-X are lying. Truth will set everything free.
“Baby boomer generation and Gen-X are lying. Truth will set everything free.”
Yes the truth will set everything to them rights. However it has nothing to do with which “current year” anyone was born in. It took decades and decades to degrade the white population. I’m sometimes surprised it took so long when I look at history, mass media control, weaponised psychology and anthropology. There have been chemical attacks i.e. Government sponsored distribution of LSD in the 60s, MDMA since then, rave trance culture etc etc.
The only thing that has changed is the Internet. If not for it the project would be a done deal.
I often wonder why Somalies are Somalies from baby to 80, Arabs are Arabs from baby to 80s, but White people have (((generations))) and accept this. It is very recent and only useful to (((workforce planners, ad agencies, and other social engineers))). Who benefits from this toxic divide that has been perfected since the 60s? This generational attitude is completely absent in pre WW2 whites.
I have parents born in the 20s, they will die soon and I will be next. My children supplant me. These are real generations.
That said the life and energy displayed my younger Whites who are informing themselves and embracing pro-white attitudes is very heartening.
My compliments to you if you are one of them.
I wish there was an edit button so I can make grammatical corrections and add a few things. I wrote this in the morning on lunch break before class. A meditation.
I am not a Baby boomer or not like my Gen-X parents. I wouldn’t know what they went through or why things happened. I can only guess and be mad at the world.
I think the internet will be the dominate force in the future. People no longer read physical books, they read the internet (and comments like these). Academia will have to record each and every YouTube comment on the internet.
I think most of our problems started with WW1. Maybe with the Romantics. Maybe. Maybe it’s just who we are. As technology progresses and history is recorded, we understand ourselves (thank you Heidegger).
I think maybe the Chinese and other East Asians follow the generation gap thing too. We are more individual and less collective. Every generation see,s to be a “Me” thing and less for the good. A problem. Nonetheless, we should be thankful for that, even if it did start The French Revolution or Postmodernism.
My Dad is abusive, my Mom cares for me. They almost had a divorce. They are still together. Things work out. But, I know Dad came from an era where heroin was popular. I am doing him a favor and making things right again. His parents were cruel to him, I won’t be cruel to my children.
I know Jared Taylor cannot turn every BLM protester straight to White Advocacy, or Rushton with science. Truth is too concrete and not practical. It’s just with Clinton, how big of a lie she is saying, too many Whites gravitating to her. Some will even resort to Sanders, a Jewish Communist. How honest can you get?
I think millennials today want to live in a social narrative. They want to be a protagonist to a story no one is reading. Girls are the biggest victims. Since everyone is doing this, no one is really “thinking about thinking” because everyone is living by this principle.
Counter-Currents is special because it thinks about the thinking about thinking paradigm. I have hope for the future.
Anger is good stuff when used wisely. Coming from a tough background gives you the opportunity to develop wisdom, skills and insight you wouldn’t otherwise possess.
I’ve had the pleasure to hear life stories from people who were born as far back as the 1890s. They survived some incredible events. I suspect today’s youth will as well. No one picks the historical era they are born into, they just rise, or don’t, to the occasion.
In the mid 1800s Americans used armed resistance to the forced government schooling of their children. Prior to forced government schooling literacy rates were much higher.
Take care.
“It took decades and decades to degrade the white population.”
It took over 2,000 years of christianity to degrade the white population.
Christianity is the problem. Everyday white christian clerics and law enforcement officers of every stripe and hue patrol their designated beats, and send annual reports up to jew headquarters.
Al Saxon-“I’m All Right Jack”
Theme song from the 1959 UK comedy film.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvmi-R9UFek
Some commentators like Phyllis Schlafly have said that Trump is the last chance for this country. If he doesn’t get in and get control of the borders/demographics, it’s all over. I want to know if we’re at the point where we need non-White voters to get Trump elected. Is the pro-White Right outnumbered? By the 2020 election there will be many more non-Whites who will have come of age to vote.
Also, because immigrants put their own pocketbooks above everything, they’ll vote Democrat to keep getting government handouts. Ann Coulter’s book: “Adios America” discusses this at length.
What you said in the essay makes sense for why Latinos and Blacks would potentially support Trump. Right now, he is winning over these demographics in the GOP. We will see how he does in national elections among these groups when it gets closer to election time.
Obama even wrote in his book “Dreams of My Father,” that Blacks do share some anxiety about illegal immigrants competing with them for jobs and decreasing their standards of living by the downward pressure they put on wages.
In Jared Taylor’s “White Identity,” he mentions that politically minded Latinos support open borders because it will ultimately increase their political power over time as Latinos become one of the largest demographics in the USA. However, Latinos are not a solid block of voters. Cubans are generally right-wing and so are Hispanics in the southwest, like Texas, who have been firmly rooted in the US since the Mexican-American War and they tend not to care much for the Johnny come lately illegal immigrants.
I do agree that White Nationalists are going to have to play politics at some point and form racial alliances in order to do what is in our best interests. We will not have the luxury of outnumbering other groups in a few decades and just because we have the numbers, doesn’t mean we have the voters as we see with White liberals (~40% of White voters) who consistently vote against the interests of White America.