Heinlein for Right-WingersLennart Svensson
Does Right-wing science fiction even exist? Indeed it does. Authors like Frank Herbert (Dune), Gordon Dickson (Dorsai), Jerry Pournelle (The Mercenary), and Ray Bradbury (Fahrenheit 451) have one or two things to say to a man of the Right – the real Right, the Right unaffected by political correctness. And the prime American sci-fi author in this respect is Robert A. Heinlein (1907–1987). Seen from the Right, there’s no comparable American popular author, widely read from after WWII to this day.
Heinlein was a complex writer, and you can find contradictory ideas in his books. Therefore the random Heinlein book might not be expressly Right-wing. But in his early and middle period books, we find a lot of conservative views vindicated. Novels like Starman Jones, Farmer in the Sky, Citizen of the Galaxy, and Double Star are all entertaining yarns told by a man who valued responsibility, nobility of character, and self-reliance.
In some respects Heinlein became more liberal later on, but in essence he remained a Right-winger. He was, for example, a staunch anti-communist all his life when mainstream intellectuals were non-committal or even favorably disposed toward collectivism and Bolshevism. This is important to remember today, when Heinlein has become mainstream and is liked even by Left-leaning persons.
But is Heinlein relevant to ”the real right” of the 2010s? The answer is: in some respects, he is. His core values of responsibility, of service, of ”shaping up and becoming a man” have enduring relevance. In Time for the Stars (1956), we find a laconic kind of John Wayne conservatism: “A man pays his bills, keeps himself clean, respects other people, and keeps his word. He gets no credit for this; he has to do this much just to stay even with himself.” Have a shave and speak the truth. Eternal truths, traditional values. Such simple truths need to be repeated again and again, especially now when acting irresponsibly is a matter of course, when everybody blames someone else and being offended is everyone’s god-given right.
Heinlein was, of course, also a “modern” man, stressing the reality of technological progress, but traditional traits are there too. For instance, he served in the Navy as an officer, and the military can be seen as a symbol of the archaic in the modern. As modern and high-tech as any service branch may be, they still regard honor as a high value, up there with duty and country.
In Space Cadet (1948) Heinlein went to some length in giving us the Traditional Creed, military version. This novel is about serving in the Space Navy of the future, upholding justice in the solar system of 2075. Space Cadet comes across as a hymn to the life of service, exemplifying the traditional values an officer has to embody: self-restraint, responsibility, nobility of character. Responsibility, for its part, is what keeps any fighting unit together.
In stressing the value of responsibility, Heinlein even hints at the dictatorial traits the commander of a vessel must have; he’s an absolute ruler, symbolizing the law to his crew, all for the common good. Further, an officer must have a modicum of ambition, but he mustn’t be a careerist. The Heinlein mouthpiece, the commander of the Space Academy, brings the argument home by saying that an officer has to be a true and noble knight. That’s tradition in our age; that’s the archaic in the modern in a nutshell.
One of Heinlein’s most outstanding works is the novel Starship Troopers (1959). Programatically and politically, this novel is about how to combine responsibility with authority. For this Heinlein advocated restricting the right to vote to people who have done public service – not merely soldiers but everyone who has served the common good in a professional function. (The emphasis is necessarily militaristic, because mankind is fighting a savage alien enemy.) Thus the sacred cow of democracy was slaughtered. Some find Space Cadet a more effective military sci-fi story; the gung-ho tone of Starship Troopers sometimes gets a bit annoying. But as a storyteller Heinlein was seldom boring, and Starship Troopers remains a classic in almost every respect.
From the 1960s on, Heinlein’s books are more problematic. They are not essential reading for the Right-winger. But one novel from the 1960s where traditional values are discussed is worth looking at briefly: Glory Road (1963). Here we meet an American on a tour of service in Southeast Asia in 1960, as a military adviser. He never advances further than corporal, but he does see some action. To the reader he says that he’s a patriot and always has been; this was no popular stance in the 1960s, and he had to tone it down in order to pass his Social Sciences class. This is a fine example of Heinlein the patriot.
The initial chapters of the novel are a superb survey of the affluent society and the post-war safe generation, seen from the Right. The story then moves on into a parallel world. In this fairy world the narrator, Oscar Gordon, gets embroiled in an adventurous quest. He becomes a hero, and in one scene he’s approached by a youngster wishing to see his sword. Gordon grants him his wish and then lectures him on how to become a hero himself. Gordon plays it down a bit. Sayings like these were indeed not in sync with the current Zeitgeist, and Heinlein is implicitly and explicitly aware of that. Still, in the scene in question, Gordon says to the lad that there’s always room at the top; study hard, work hard, and wait for the right moment; then you might make it.
And, in an echo chivalrous stories from the Middle Ages, the youngster is advised to always introduce himself to women coming in his way. Approach ladies and get to know them. This was also stressed by the Grail stories, according to Julius Evola in The Mystery of the Grail (1934). These knights were not overburdened with chastity. They merely wanted to avoid being completely ruled by carnal cravings. Otherwise . . . befriend ladies! This was the gist of the chivalric stories. Heinlein’s advice exquisitely mirrors this.
The young lad is then shown a quarter with the image of George Washington, which Gordon has in his pocket. Washington is lauded as a man who always spoke the truth, who fought against impossible odds and persevered. Now, Washington and the regime he inaugurated may not be entirely ideal for ”the real Right” of today, but what’s important here is what Washington represents. He is an ideal to show to a young man finding his way. Washington stood tall and proud; do the same! In saying this and the rest to the lad, Gordon has risen to the occasion; he himself has represented wisdom and heroism; he himself is someone to look up to. The lad expected to hear something like this, and Gordon delivered.
Heinlein’s current reputation as a liberal libertine is undeserved. He was indeed complex and held different views over time, sometimes from book to book. But the lasting impression of Heinlein is of a conservative wary of his times, a man who continued to defend traditional values even as the mainstream turned against them. For Heinlein, implicit in values like self-restraint, self-reliance, and personal responsibility is the affirmation that we are living, breathing organisms, not machines. Heinlein glorifies man the agent.
It is true that his late novels are verbose and lack the vitality of the earlier books. But most of his short stories and novels from his debut in 1939 up to around 1960 have undeniable value. Their straightforward, unadorned narratives are always entertaining and sparkle with gems of traditional wisdom.
Enoch Powell, poslední tory
Remembering Richard M. Weaver (March 3, 1910–April 1, 1963)
Lipton Matthews Interviews Beau Albrecht about MLK
Forgotten Roots of the Left: Fichte’s Moral & Political Philosophy, Part II
Against Political Hipsterism
The Bene Gesserit Books: Frank Herbert’s Heretics of Dune & Chapterhouse: Dune
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 508 The Kanye Question with Greg Johnson
I must agree with the above statement. In many ways, Heinlein had much in common with another important figure in science fiction of his era, Gene Roddenberry of Star Trek fame. Both of them came from military (specifically naval) backgrounds and remained staunch anti-communists throughout their lives. Both of them envisioned worlds of utopian technological and social progress, complete with explicit multi-racialism which was avant-garde at the time, but which also incorporated romantic notions of military life, chivalry, exploration, loyalty, duty, etc. They therefore can be said to have incorporated both right-wing and left-wing elements into their work. Nonetheless, for nationalists and traditionalists, celebrating either as a ‘man of the right’ is misguided. What their works did accomplish was to bridge left-wing and right-wing ideas to each other, and if anything only served to provide a right-wing and traditionalist appeal to our present global liberal establishment, or the vision of the world it wants us to aim for. If Heinlein was right-wing, then so was Kalergi. Indeed, what is so commendable about apologizing for American imperialism? Supporting wars in far-off countries makes Heinlein a fine patriot? A fine patriot of what? The American Empire. Not European people, or tradition, or anything that we want to be a part of. As the Frenchman in Apocalypse Now said to Captain Willard: “You Americans, what are you fighting for? Nothing. The biggest nothing in the world.”
Someone knows about the scandal Hugo nominations, I do not think I’ve read that they are ” our ” the libstards are angry because they are not so tolerant and multicultural .
Some information .
Indeed, something’s brewing in the SF community. Like this: SF fandom, like all the rest of current society, is leftwing and PC. Now some “more or less rightist persons,” “anti-PC persons” have rebelled against this mindset. These rebels aint by a longshot “real right,” they’re merely “GOP right” or something like “Reagan followers” of the 1980’s. This is the disclaimer I hereby post so that I won’t be seelling something wrongly.
Still, anything that puts up a fight against the PC steamroller is OK as a start, I figure. The fight has taken the form of what books etc win the yearly Hugo Awards, a prestiguous SF prize issued since the 1950’s.
From memory, I believe that Derek Turner’s magazine Right Now! once published an article on right-wing elements in science fiction and fantasy literature in the late 1990s. It might be worth digging up and republishing.
He was also a proto-Libertarian who also once suggested getting rid of the Mexican border.
Needless to say, he was conquered by the free love of the 60’s. Stranger in a Strange Land was Ok but things got even stranger: his Lazarus Long went back in time thousands of years to have sex with him mother.
While certainly no White Nationalist, Heinlein was not altogether unrealistic about race. In a letter (never sent) to another science fiction writer that touched on the question of Black mental capacity, he evinced considerable skepticism about what he called the “sacrosanct assumption” that both races would have evolved identical mental characteristics. And in Heinlein’s novel Time Enough for Love, the main character (himself a product of eugenics, and a virtually immortal superman) expresses regret that more Chinese did not manage to flee into space before Earth civilization collapsed, adding, “I suspect that the Chinese average smarter than the rest of Earth’s spawn.”
The above is not intended as a defense of Heinlein, because he needs no defense. For all of his flaws, I am proud that I belong to the race that produced him.
I’m a fan of Heinlein’s work , And really enjoyed reading this, Thank you.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment