4 comments

1. Will Williams says:

   January 4, 2026 at 4:06 am

   Greg: Help us bring back such experiences in 2026 by giving today.

   —

   Will do. The 2025 donation goal fell short. So what. To help get C-C’s goal for 2026 off to a good start the National Alliance hereby donates $1,000 and encourages others who participate here to sacrifice monetarily what you can to surpass this year’s goal. At least pay to get behind C-C’s paywall for a meager $10 per month.

   I realize that I irk some here for constantly promoting the teachings of William Pierce, the organization he founded 55 years ago, the National Alliance, and the philosophy, belief system (non-Semitic religion) he founded for our people 50 years ago, Cosmotheism. Those who are irked should simply ignore what I write since I am not writing to you.

   C-C is a vitally important Internet venue, though as current NA Chairman I do not agree with a lot of what I see here. I’m not as familiar as I should be with Jonathan Bowdon’s writing, but one thing in this New Years Eve “2025 Year in Review” essay by Greg that jumped out at me was a quote attributed to Bowden about the Right-wing, coupled with the pithy quote by Dr. Foster under that, attributed to Arthur Schopenhauer.

   —

   But it all starts with the webzine and publishing house. In his speech, “Western Civilization Bites Back,” Jonathan Bowden said:

   “Counter-Currents is, to my estimation, a sort of Right-wing university. A sort of free access Right-wing university on the Internet, a radical Right-wing university. . . . Counter-Currents is what I personally believe the best, most educative Right-wing site that I’ve come across . . . . 

   —

   
   

   It does not matter to most C-C readers that I repeat what Dr. Pierce told us 50 years ago in his “Our Cause” speech: that our Alliance is neither Right-wing nor Left-Wing, but racist — biological. But those who ignore that fact may appreciate what Mr. Schopenhauer may have had to say about that, if he ever said anything. He was Hitler’s favorite philosopher — mine, too. Being such a pessimist, anti-Jew with his eventual dim view of Christianity, he may have still been considered a conservative in his day, but it’s doubtful he ever referred to himself as a Right-winger.

   Pierce was right!

   One of our top contemporary authors today, Dr. Thomas Dalton, PhD, is right also when he writes this in one of his 35-plus books we carry at our online bookstore (Thomas Dalton – Cosmotheism), The Steep Climb: Essays on the Jewish Question (p. 395 – 396)

   “The Way Forward In sum, the popular Left-Right divide in American politics is a fake dichotomy, constructed by and serving the interests of a Jewish elite and their well-paid Gentile lackeys. When people focus all their attention and energy on this contrived distinction, they are distracted from, and thus overlook, the true and deeper causes of social crisis in this country [race]. The fake Right and the fake Left both serve their Jewish masters. Only by moving beyond this superficial divide can we get to the root of things.”

   To be radicalized means getting to the “root of things,” as in radical surgery. My intention when deciding to get behind C-C’s paywall a couple of years ago was to help radicalize some here who seem to be nominal “WNs.” Maybe I have, maybe I haven’t. I appreciate that Greg has allowed me a seat at the C-C table and has never edited or blocked even one of my nearly 1,300 comments.

   I transcribed Dalton’s quote from his book and don’t have time to transcribe more of it tonight. Perhaps tomorrow I’ll find time to transcribe what he wrote about “Right-winger” Tucker Carlson while he was still a prime-time star at Fox News every night. It’s worth sharing since Tucker has been featured here lately at C-C.

   —

   Arthur Schopenhauer wrote, ‘But life is short, and truth works far and long; let us speak the truth.’—Stephen Paul Foster, PhD.

   0

   0

   Reply
   1. Greg Johnson says:

      January 4, 2026 at 5:08 pm

      Wow, Will, this is wonderfully generous. Thank you. I think you add a lot to the comments here, and yes, Peirce and the National Alliance are voices worth engaging.

      0

      0

      Reply
      1. Will Williams says:

         January 5, 2026 at 10:14 pm

         Sorry, I posted this comment to the wrong topic (highlighted below). Proper formatting can be seen there.

          

         Will Williams: January 5, 2026
          Greg Johnson: January 4, 2026 at 5:08 pm Wow, Will, this is wonderfully generous. Thank you. I think you add a lot to the comments here, and yes, Pierce and the National Alliance are voices worth engaging.
         —

          

          

         You’re welcome. The fact is, many nominal White loyalists eventually will be sufficiently radicalized to embrace what Pierce preached. However, his followers will not be joining with those in the “big tent.”

         … Perhaps tomorrow I’ll find time to transcribe what [Dr. Dalton] wrote about “Right-winger” Tucker Carlson (in 2023) while he was still a prime-time star at Fox News every night. It’s worth sharing since Tucker has been discussed lately at C-C.  (See: https://counter-currents.com/2025/12/tucker-carlsons-colorblind-christianity/)

         …America needs to be replaced with something else — something new, something different, something that will protect and defend  the social well-being of the American majority and the ecological basis. Sadly, very few of the “insurrectionists” seem to have any conception of the Judeocracy that rules over them and which dictates much of what Trump does and says; this strongly suggests that they severely misread the real basis of American power politics. Most of those people , I would suggest, are members of the “fake Right” — a manipulated and distorted ideology that serves the purposes of the ruling Jewish elite.

         The True Problems of “the Left” (pages 392-395)

         Returning to the main theme, the fake Left is a heavily Jewish enterprise. But most people, Left and Right, don’t know this or don’t acknowledge it, and they therefore don’t object to that fact. When those on the Right object to the Left, it is usually to more concrete (but secondary) issues. We can make  a short list: leftists are for “big government”; they support “open borders”; they want to take our guns; they stifle our freedom of speech (or freedom generally); they are authoritarian; they conduct “cancel culture”; they demonize Whites; they are anti-Christian; they tyrannize the public, as via their over-hyped Covid panic; they “tax and spend.” Maybe even “they hate America” (if we listen to Tucker Carlson). Doubtless we could add more, but I think this covers the main concerns for most on the Right.
         I cannot argue with these points; I think all of them are basically true. But there are deeper factors at work that help to explain this collective phenomenon, which is why we need to press a bit harder to really understand the process at work here.
         When I consider the many objectionable features of what is called the Left, I compile a different sort of list. For what it’s worth, I find it to have the following negative qualities:
             A desire to impose their beliefs on others. This is the ” “authoritarian,” controlling,” and “liberty-loathing” aspect. Leftist liberals seem to have an inordinate need to compel others to follow their belief-system. They are the antithesis of “live and let live.” They have little or no tolerance for dissenting views, especially those that threaten their own positions. They know that rational dissent will severely undermine their credibility, so they suppress it. 7
             They are blind to the realities of race, biology, and genetics. For the Left, most of human nature is a “social construction” — something pliable and malleable, something that can be defined and redefined almost at will. Humans are merely a plastic biology; the many races are rather like different colors of Playdough, all equally moldable into new shapes and forms. This results in an over-inclusive and naive egalitarianism.
         But this is not reality. The fact is that there are profound and unalterable differences between human beings, both between and within races. These are manifest in physical, mental, emotional, psychological, and cultural ways. They are rooted in genetics, and cannot be washed away. But leftists have deeply imbibed the fallacy of human equality.Many are also functional relativists who cannot bear to make value distinctions. (I should note here the difference between the leftist elite, who espouse views that they don’t really believe, and the naive leftist masses who generally do seem to believe them.) As a result, leftists say incredibly stupid things and make incredibly stupid policy proposals.
             No concept of noble humanity. When one swallows the myth of human equality, one condemns the human race to a miserable mediocracy. If all are equal, then none are better, and in fact no one can be better. Equality denies the existence of superior individuals, who are the very ones who drive society forward. When such superior individuals do appear — as they inevitably do — they are suppressed, censored, attacked, perhaps jailed, perhaps killed. Superior individuals put the lie to the myth of equality, which is one reason why they are so dangerous to the Left. Because leftists have repudiated the whole concept of noble humanity, they represent a profound threat to human well-being. They effectively destroy the future of our race.
             A pathology of pity. Leftists are pity-mongers in the extreme. They wallow in pity. They praise pity. And they sell pity. 8 Great individuals and great societies do not wallow in pity. They accept pain, hardship, and loss, and then they move on. They give a fair respect to all of humanity, but they don’t elevate the lesser or the weak. They don’t allow the lesser to dominate or even to consume inordinate time or resources. The lesser of one’s own race are cared for quietly, and the lesser of other races are excluded. Such an approach can seem harsh, but such is life. 
             Dangerous and possibly fatal naivete. By accepting false but comforting myths, by failing to address the real threats to society, by adopting a de facto philo-Semitism, and by wallowing in an over-socialized and misdirected form of pity, leftists dodge the hard reality of the modern world. In doing so, they doom society to inevitable suffering and decay. Life is hard, evolution can be brutal, and choices are painful. Leftists, though, prefer the easy way out; they seek to avoid all conflict and confrontation, and are happy to surrender control of their lives to, for example, a Jewish elite who would like nothing more than to use them, exploit them, and utterly crush them in the end.
             Only by addressing these deeper failings of the Left can we get to the root of the problem.

         Where Is the Opposition? 

         As I mentioned above, all sectors of the Right oppose leftism, but most are half-hearted — or worse. Let me make a specific example. Perhaps the most visible and vocal critic of the Left is Tucker Carlson of Fox News. In Chapter 26 of the present volume, I have critiqued his modus operandi, but here I want to emphasize his deeper alignment with the Left.
         We can compare Carlson’s worldview to that of the typical leftist:                   
             (A) The leftist, being a naive egalitarian, is anti-racist. He believes deeply in human equality. He is pro-democracy (at least verbally) and he supports “America.” He is materialistic; he strives for a thriving economy, economic growth, and material prosperity. Most importantly, he is philosemitic; he supports Israel, defends Jewish interests, promotes Jewish ideology, and gives free reign to Jewish voices. The leftist never ‘outs’ Jews, never really criticizes Israel, never seeks to limit Jewish dominance in government, finance, media, or academia, and never calls to restrict their activities. In this way, the leftist maintains his status and material well-being.
             (B) Carlson, being a naive egalitarian, is an anti-racist. He believes deeply in human equality. He is pro-democracy (at least verbally) and he supports “America.” He is materialistic; he strives for a thriving economy, economic growth, and material prosperity. Most importantly, he is philosemitic; he supports Israel, defends Jewish interests, promotes Jewish ideology, and gives free reign to Jewish voices. Carlson never ‘outs’ Jews, never really criticizes Israel, never seeks to limit Jewish dominance in government, finance, media, or academia and never calls to restrict their activities. In this way, Carlson maintains his status and material well-being. 
         I trust that we can see the similarities here… 9

         To be continued…

         Footnotes:
         7 Again, the Left has no monopoly on this issue. The Right can be just as imposing.
         8 One need only watch any episode of popular television shows, especially so-called reality TV. Show like “Ameican Idol” or “Dancing with the Stars” or “America’s Got Talent” are endless parades of sob stories. Crying contestants are de rigueur. [I remember the pathetic “Queen For a Day” TV show from the 1950s, predecessor to modern “reality” shows. Check it out: https://www.history.com/articles/this-midcentury-show-turned-unhappy-housewives-into-tv-royalty
         9 There are, of course, differences: Carlson is anti-immigration, pro-Christian, Covid-skeptical, and withering in his critique of the Biden regime. But the similarities are more significant and more consequential than the differences.

         ———-

         0

         0

         Reply
         1. Will Williams says:

            January 19, 2026 at 3:11 am

            …continued, as promised, if two weeks late, from Dr. Thomas Dalton’s The Steep Climb (p. 395):  

            … I trust that we can see the similarities here. 9  And yet Carlson is supposedly an exemplary member of “the Right.” Sadly, he is not alone; the above description applies to a large majority of the nominal Right. This precisely why the alleged Right is a fake right and why so many populist conservatives are fake conservatives.

                If Carlson and others were true right-wingers, and true conservatives, they would display the characteristics I cited above. They would be openly and explicitly anti-minority, anti-egalitarian, explicitly “racist” (or “racialist”), anti-Semitic, pro-environment, anti-technology(and not just anti-Big Tech), and perhaps even anti-democratic. They might be anti-capitalist, knowing that the disruption caused by unrestrained free-market capitalism, God forbid, they might even be a little socialist! That would be not so much patriotic — which implies a kind of naive acceptance of the ruling class and the existing political order — but rather truly nationalist, in the sense of defending one’s own race and ethnicity, which is, after all, the true basis of a “nation”. 10

                Where, then, are the true conservatives? Where lies the true Right? It is almost impossible to find, even in the big wide world of the Internet. We can be thankful for organizations like The Occidental Observer, The Unz Review, and National Vanguard** who are willing to call a spade a spade. Thankful for individuals like Kevin MacDonald, and Andrew Anglin, William White Williams and David Duke, who are willing to speak openly and intelligently about the Jewish Question.*** Thankful for the small circle of leading Holocaust revisionists, who work relentlessly to undermine the keystone of Jewish mendacity. 11  Without such individuals we would be lost. With them, we have hope.

            The Way Forward

            In sum, the popular Left-Right divide in American politics is a fake dichotomy, constructed by and serving the interests of a Jewish elite and their well-paid Gentile lackeys. When people focus all their attention and energy on this contrived distinction, they are distracted from, and thus overlook, the true and deeper causes of social crisis in this country. The fake Right and the fake Left both serve their Jewish masters. Only by moving beyond this superficial divide can we get to the root of things…. (emphasis added)

            For more of this chapter and the next, “America Must Die — So That the People Can Live,” purchase Dr. Dalton’s The Steep Climb, here:

            https://cosmotheistchurch.org/product-category/books/thomas-dalton/

            Footnote:

            11. Among whom I would include Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno, and Jurgen Graf. Any discussion of Holocaust revisionism that does not mention these men is not worth its salt — and probably deliberately deceptive.

            ** Clarification: National Vanguard is mistakenly called an organization here, but in reality is the online magazine of its organization, the National Alliance.  This is a common mistake due to its domain, natvan.com (founded, along with natall.com, by William Pierce in 1995), having been changed 20 years ago when Kevin Strom, who controlled the domain name at the time, broke away from Erich Gliebe’s NA and formed a splinter organization that he named National Vanguard. Kevin’s National Vanguard group became defunct by 2007. Nationalvanguard.org has officially belonged to the current National Alliance since 2014 when I became NA Chairman.

            *** I’m honored to be named by Dr. Dalton, along with David Duke and Kevin MacDonald as one of few Whites who “speak openly and intelligently about the Jewish Question.” However, I can do without being compared to nutty Nazi Andrew Anglin and the racial Jew Ron Unz, thanks. 

            0

            0

            Reply