Counter-Currents
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 479 Bubba Kate Paris on the State of Nationalism in the UK
Counter-Currents Radio
126 words / 1:01:57
Host Greg Johnson welcomed British activist Kate Fanning, a.k.a. Bubba Kate Paris, back to the show to discuss the state of nationalism in the United Kingdom, and it is now available for download and online listening.
Topics discussed include:
02:26 Kate’s background
07:28 Kate’s contact info
08:23 What do you think of the royal family?
10:01 In retrospect, was Brexit a good thing?
12:29 Did Brexit help nationalism in Great Britain?
18:22 What do you think of Patriotic Alternative and other nationalist groups in England?
24:07 Why must it be a man to lead nationalist groups?
31:32 What are your thoughts on the new book The Last White Man?
39:05 Are you hopeful about the trajectory of nationalism?
To listen in a player, click here. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
* * *
Don’t forget to sign up for the weekly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
- Fifth, Paywall members will have access to the Counter-Currents Telegram group.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
3 comments
The question was raised on the program about why White people are not up in arms over the various depredations of third worlders in their homelands. Some thoughts…
When the question of getting openly politically active comes up, a standard normie response is: “I have a job and family, and speaking out would put them at risk.”
Now, often, this mindset is an excuse for inaction, a preference for bourgeoisie comfort (“grill and chill”) over the risks of taking it to the streets. But there is some truth to this objection.
It’s not just loss of employment. There’s the threat of prosecution under various hatespeak laws, being de-platformed, and mob violence against one’s person and property. For an individual to get active, there has to be some organization backing them up. This means fronts for legal defense, fundraising, getting your own protesters into the streets, and ensuring peoples’ jobs.
Of course, there have been various attempts by the Dissident Right to set up such organizations, and these have been duly met with repression, both directly by the Regime and indirectly by Regime controlled “private” companies and NGOs.
One thing which really kills activism is in conservative “principles.” The mantras are: “No one has a right to a job so you can not complain if you are fired for your politics;” or “Free Speech does not mean you are free from the consequences of your speech;” or “The First Amendment applies only to censorship by the government, not to de-platformings by private companies because muh John Galt.”
One thing which needs be done is to come up with counters to these lines. Doing so would free up people mentally so they would then have the intellectual foundation to push back.
For example, Free Speech is not just a matter of protection against government censorship but instead promoting a culture of open expression. A Dissident Right organization might be able to launch wrongful termination lawsuits or organize boycotts against companies which fire people for their politics outside the workplace. Might also add a plank about promoting a law to prohibit de-platformings and such. Even if such laws are never passed, they would show your average working class stiff that the Dissident Right is on their side.
The actions of Patriotic Alternative, the Yellow Vests, the trucker-farmer protests and the anti-vaxx groups are an indicator of the potential for mass action. The critical thing is for the Dissident Right to provide some metapolitical leadership and get people to break with the bourgeoisie mindset.
Do you guys try to make it boring to get me to stop reading? Am I that terrible? I actually think that’s what Occidental observer did too. And stopped updating the comments. I’m sorry. What should I read on the web? It seems like any individual is less important than a wider spiritual mission. It’s a peculiar myopia.
Bubba Kate Paris’s plain and blunt attitudes used to be much more common than they are now, and in eras when they were more common our race was much more successful than it is now.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.