Counter-Currents
Ricky Shiffer, an Ohio man who was recently killed while attempting to attack an IRS office after calling for others to rise up against the US government, in an incident the timing of which is very much not suspicious and you’re crazy to even suggest that it might be.
2,676 words
Salman Rushdie Finally Gets Stabbed
Apparently, Allah gets very upset when people disrespect him. Apparently, Allah is more thin-skinned than Frank Sinatra. I’ve never quite understood how a divine entity can have his feelings hurt by mere mortals, but I’ve read enough of the Koran to realize that Allah is mercurial to the point where his mental condition might require medication.
For the last 34 years, ever since he published The Satanic Verses — which many fundamentalist ragheads found to be intensely hurtful toward both Allah and his One True Prophet — India-born former Muslim and current atheist Salman Rushdie has been the world’s most prominent Allah-disrepecter.
The Satanic Verses was banned in Iran. The year after its publication, Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa calling for Rushdie’s death. Although Khomeini died later that year, the fatwa has never been rescinded. For over three decades, Rushdie has had a three-million-dollar bounty hanging over his head like a Sword of Damocles.
An estimated 45 or more people have been killed in rioting over the book. In 1989, a certain Mustafa Mahmoud Mazeh ascended to paradise after a premature explosion of a book bomb he’d intended to detonate in Rushdie’s vicinity. Instead, the bomb took out two floors of a London hotel. A shrine to Mazeh in Tehran’s Behesht Zahra cemetery bears the inscription “Martyred in London, 3 August 1989. The first martyr to die on a mission to kill Salman Rushdie.”
Two years later, a Japanese translator of The Satanic Verses was stabbed to death. That same year, an Italian translator was stabbed but survived. In 1993, the Norwegian publisher of The Satanic Verses was shot three times and also lived.
On Friday, while attempting to give a lecture in western New York State about how the United States has served as a sanctuary for exiled writers, Rushdie was stabbed an estimated ten times. He suffered a damaged liver, severed nerves in one arm, and likely the loss of one eye. He is expected to survive.
Clearly, Allah needs to hire better assassins.
The event’s moderator, 73-year-old Henry Reese, co-founded an organization that offers support for persecuted writers. He was also scheduled to speak but instead suffered a facial injury during the attack.
According to Kathleen James, who was in the audience, the attacker was dressed in black and wore a black mask. “We thought perhaps it was part of a stunt to show that there’s still a lot of controversy around this author,” she said. “But it became evident in a few seconds” that it wasn’t a stunt.
Police have arrested 24-year-old New Jersey resident Hadi Matar and charged him with attempted murder. Matar is reportedly sympathetic to the Iranian regime.
According to police, there were no metal detectors or security searches at the event. If the one-eyed ex-Muzzie author pulls through as it looks like he will, he’ll have one hell of a lawsuit against the venue.
New Mexico Serial Killer of Muslims is Found — and He’s a Muslim, Too
In further murderous news about the Religion of Peace, the arid and meth-ridden town of Albuquerque, New Mexico has been plagued — or blessed, depending on how you feel about Islam — by the murders of four Muslim men that started last November when 62-year-old Mohammad Ahmadi was shot dead in a parking lot outside a halal supermarket.
In late July and early August, three more Muslim men were killed, leading to predictable outrage about hate, intolerance, and Islamophobia. All three of them attended Albuquerque’s largest mosque, the Islamic Center of New Mexico, and all three were shot near Central Avenue, the main drag in downtown Albuquerque.
“The targeted killings of Muslim residents of Albuquerque is deeply angering and wholly intolerable,” New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham recently tweeted.
All of the victims were of Pakistani or Muslim descent, and their murders stirred up not only terror within Albuquerque’s tiny Islamic community but within the broader American public who’ve been brainwashed into thinking that there is no possible justification for fearing Muslims.
Now that a suspect has been arrested, it turns out that the murders were indeed inspired by anti-Muslim hate, but of the intramural variety. On Tuesday, police took 51-year-old Muhammad Syed into custody and have formally charged him with two of the killings and suspect him of the other two. The alleged motive is that Syed is a Sunni Muslim who was angered by the fact that his daughter had allegedly married a Shi’ite Muslim.
Sunnis and Shi’ites, whose main doctrinal squabble centers around who was Muhammad’s legitimate successor, are like Catholics and Protestants except for the fact that Catholics and Protestants no longer engage in centuries-long wars against each other. The worst that Catholics and Protestants do to one another these days is squabble on Reddit threads, whereas Sunnis and Shi’ites hate one another as ferociously as they both hate Jews.
But although the Sunni/Shi’ite schism is an ongoing source of bloodshed in the Middle East, Edward Ahmed Mitchell, director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, says that “There is no significant history of violence at all in the US between Shi’as and Sunnis.”
Well, there’s a first time for everything, and the first time is usually not the last. Praise be to Allah for things such as diversity and open immigration.
IRS is Hiring Agents Who are “Willing to Use Deadly Force”
The recently passed $485-billion Inflation Reduction Act — and we all know that nothing reduces inflation more quickly than piling another half-trillion dollars on the national debt — sets aside $80 billion to beef up the IRS and enables its agents to harass, hound, heckle, and even kill the average Working Joe Taxpayer, who ironically is paying the salaries of the IRS agents assigned to harass him.
Reports vary, but the bill will roughly double the number of extant IRS employees, which would give the agency more workers than the FBI, Pentagon, State Department, and Border Patrol combined.
In case you were unaware, the IRS is the real US government. None of the other tentacles of the federal octopus would be able to exist without the Internal Revenue Service fleecing Americans of their earnings and wasting the money on programs that very few Americans would ever greenlight if directly given the authority to give them a thumbs up or thumbs down. The IRS is the closest thing the United States has to an institutional Mafia.
On Tuesday, the Biden Administration averred that no one earning less than $400K a year would be subject to the financial sodomy of an audit. Then, an amendment to the bill was quietly slipped in that removed that stipulation. In its current form, the bill enables the IRS to go after whomever they choose.
In 2021, according to the Washington Post, more than half of those audited made less than $75,000 a year. More than 40% of those audited received the earned income tax credit, which was designed to aid those who are barely subsisting above the poverty level. Y’see, it’s easier to go after the poor and working class for tax violations because they don’t have the wherewithal to hire a battalion of accountants to thread all the loopholes, nor do they have the means to hire squadrons of lawyers to fight back.
Notably, every Democrat voted to slip in that amendment, and every Republican voted against it. The Democrats have no qualms about squeezing blood from working-class turnips. They have officially become the party of the rich.
In the original version of a listing the agency posted for the job of “IRS Criminal Investigation Agent,” one of the major “duties” listed was: “Carry a firearm and be willing to use deadly force, if necessary.”
Then, maybe realizing that the whole thing about using deadly force against taxpayers might not be a good look, they removed that line.
When you intend to kill people, it’s prudent not to give them advance warning.
Man with “Extremist Ties” Attacks Cincinnati IRS Building with a Nail Gun
In case you were wondering what an “extremist” is, it’s someone whose views were entirely mainstream 50 years ago.
After FBI agents raided Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence on Monday, murmurs burbled up on Right-wing social media like the boiling mud pots of Yellowstone National Park that this injustice would not stand and that it was time to eliminate the FBI by force if necessary, as if there’d be any other conceivable way of eliminating it.
In the days following the raid on Mar-a-Lago, 42-year-old Ricky Shiffer of Columbus, Ohio — assuming he was a real human being rather than a decoy cyborg invented in a federal lab — started posting on social media that it was time to engage in violent combat with the feds and kill them if necessary.
On Twitter, he claimed that he attended the Capitol Disaster on January 6 and implied that the crowd’s unruly elements were either antifa members or government plants:
I was there. We watched as your goons did that. When I told the ones trying to break back in that Trump tweeted be peaceful, one of them said, “Fuck Trump.”
In another post, he endorsed murdering federal agents:
Be ready to kill the enemy, not mass shootings where leftists go, not lighting busses on fire with transexuals [sic] in them, not finding people with lefist [sic] signs in their yards and beating them up, Violence is not terrorism. Kill the F.B.I. on sight, and be ready to take down other active enemies of the people and those who try to prevent you from doing it.
In his last tweet, he encouraged readers to align themselves with the Proud Boys — who to my knowledge were founded in 2016 rather than 1776 and have never advocated overthrowing the US government — and help them overthrow the US government:
Save ammunition, get in touch with the Proud Boys and learn how they did it in the Revolutionary War, because submitting to tyranny while lawfully protesting was never the American way.
On Tuesday on the conservative-leaning social-media site Truth Social, Shiffer reiterated his call for violence:
People, this is it. I hope a call to arms comes from someone better qualified, but if not, this is your call to arms from me. Leave work tomorrow as soon as the gun shop/Army-Navy store/pawn shop opens, get whatever you need to be ready for combat. We must not tolerate this one.
On Thursday morning around 9 AM EST, Shiffer entered an IRS building in Cincinnati and began firing at the facility’s bulletproof-glass protective barrier with a nail gun, apparently figuring that if bullets couldn’t penetrate it, nails would do the trick. When the nails failed to shatter the glass and an alarm began sounding, Shiffer fled the scene, hopped in his car, and motored about 20 miles south until the feds caught up and cornered him. During an extended standoff, this creature of the digital age found time to post the following on Truth Social:
Well, I thought I had a way through bullet proof [sic] glass, and I didn’t. If you don’t hear from me, it is true I tried attacking the F.B.I., and it’ll mean either I was taken off the internet, the F.B.I. got me, or they sent the regular cops while —
— and the post ended there with the word “while.”
After he hoisted an AR-15 rifle during the standoff, the feds shot him dead. Or at least that’s how it’s being reported. I haven’t been able to examine the alleged corpse. Perhaps Shiffer was a lone wolf who snapped. Or maybe it was a government op. But the super-convenient timing and rhetoric makes this event stink like a bucket of fish in the Mojave Desert.
If Men Had Periods, They Still Wouldn’t Be as Whiny and Bitchy as Women
At some dim point more than two millennia ago, the author of Ecclesiastes famously opined that there’s nothing new under the sun.
Nowadays, in a copycat world drowning in postmodernism, things are less new than they were two thousand years ago.
A 1978 article in Ms. magazine by Gloria Steinem called “If Men Could Menstruate” proved to be so popular that people continue to shamelessly plagiarize it. Steinem wrote:
A white minority of the world has spent centuries conning us into thinking that a white skin makes people superior — even though the only thing it really does is make them more subject to ultraviolet rays and to wrinkles. . . . What would happen, for instance, if suddenly, magically, men could menstruate and women could not? . . . The answer is clear — menstruation would become an enviable, boast-worthy, masculine event: Men would brag about how long and how much. . . . Sanitary supplies would be federally funded and free.
Steinem used the word “white” in the first sentence, but the title at least referred to men in general. And this was the 1970s, when a case could be made that at least a few white men were still in charge of a few things.
An undated essay called “If Men Had Periods” — not so far off at all from “If Men Could Menstruate” — rips off Steinem’s conceit about free feminine-hygiene products:
If men had periods, there would be free menstrual products in every single bathroom. Companies would sweat over this expense no more than they sweat over toilet paper, because they would acknowledge that whilst not every person poops every time they go to the bathroom, it’s a pretty rough day when you’re caught at the times you do with no paper.
A 2015 essay titled “ ‘If Men Had Periods’ How Would Life Be Different?” seems to imply that menstruation has been the main obstacle preventing women from, you know, inventing anything that has ever been invented:
If men had periods, the world would probably be a very different place . . . us men would be able to use NASA-derived manpon [sic] products. But beyond having to keep a rocket in my pocket, if men had periods, women and girls would presumably face far fewer obstacles in life.
Now comes an essay by a a greasy-haired, dog-faced woman named Sarah Lehman called “IF CIS STRAIGHT WHITE MEN MENSTRUATED,” and it continues to peddle the archaic notion that men are privileged in this society:
We do everything we can to make life easier for cisgender straight white men. . . . Men should be forgiven for anything they say during their period. We don’t care if he made a snide comment about your gray hair. . . . We hope this letter reinforces that we care about cishet white men above anyone else. Stay tuned for additional guidance regarding their pregnancy in the coming weeks.
The essay was signed “The Patriarchy.”
So the only thing they’ve added are the “cis” and “het” parts. In the 44 years that have passed since Steinem’s article, they’ve found two new ways to demonize normal people.
Even though women live longer, control more personal wealth than men, and have the legal and societal benefit of the doubt in any conflict with a man, they’re still flogging this notion that men are privileged.
There’s a reason for misogyny. That reason is women.
Brown Man Writes Novel Called The Last White Man
The 1970 Melvin Van Peebles satirical film Watermelon Man starred black comedian Godfrey Cambridge as a white bigot who wakes up one day to discover to his horror that he has transformed into a black man. The film was not exactly kind to the notion of whiteness. Then again, it wasn’t outright genocidal toward white people, either.
The same cannot be said of The Last White Man, a novel by the bald, smirking, big-eared British Pakistani author Mohsin Hamid. Like Watermelon Man, its device is reminiscent of Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis”: “One morning, Anders, a white man, woke up to find he had turned a deep and undeniable brown.”
I suppose it’s true that both non-white humans and cockroaches are “an undeniable brown.”
Unlike Watermelon Man, though, everyone on Earth turns “an undeniable brown.” According to a review of the novel in The Spectator, “Calm eventually settles when the world’s population turns brown and white people become a distant memory.”
I’ve had enough white genocide for this week. See you next week.
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here.
66 comments
“Salman Rushdie Finally Gets Stabbed”
Yes, unlike the rest, we do not play around.
We take our faith extremely seriously.
No room for any crap.
Absolutely non-negotiable.
This Zionist-shill, piece of shit is solely responsible for what has been taking place in his life since he ejaculated that vomit-stream of a book.
If only the White West too had retained a sense of sacredness and self-respect…alas, it was blown to uphold “freedom of expression” and “freedom of speech”.
And now, people are exercising that same “right” to call for the obliteration of the White race through various devices [novels, plays, comedies, etc.]
“No room for any crap.”
PLEASE tell me the word “crap” is somewhere in the Koran.
The only acceptable place for people who demand this degree of obeisance to their god is far away.
Islam, as I’ve said before, is Judaism with a meat cleaver. And it’s wholly incompatible with white society.
The Bible alludes to this. Ishmael is the father of the Arab/Islamic people whom Abraham banishes at the suggestion of his wife. When conflicted with this, even God himself tells Abraham to listen to his wife. If we take the story at face value and the tradition that Ishmael is the father of the Arabs/Muslims, then there is in fact a divine mandate for segregation of Arabs/Muslims and non-Arabs/non-Muslims.
My problem with Muslims, including Mohammad Aryan, is that they’re all rough and tough when its convenient or they think they’re going to win, but then when they get their asses handed to them they start sounding like a cucked EU bureaucrat. Look at Israel. First it’s, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free!” and “there’s a Jew behind the grass, let me kill him!” then it’s, “those bombs were against international law!” Which roughly translates as, “we couldn’t beat the Jews ourselves, we need the help of white Christians now.” Sad, very sad.
I almost feel sort of bad for Palestinians, though. A bunch of inbred Arabs with no impulse control mixed with a view of their religion that’s stuck circa the 800’s and an arsenal of glorified Estes rockets against a bunch of neurotic high IQ Ashkenazi Jews who over the past couple years have successfully gaslit large swarths of the Arab world to forget the plight of their Palestinian brethren and created diplomatic relationships with Israel. At least Islam isn’t so accepting to the whole LGBTQ thing, credit where credit is do. I can’t express how cringe it is to drive past churches and see the rainbow flag flying there.
@Josephus Cato
What kind of timeline do you have in your mind?
What makes you think the issue is dead and buried?
Arab elites may have prostituted themselves to the Zionist scum but that doesn’t mean the struggle against this disgusting cancer is over.
The overrated phenomenon of “Arab Nationalism” was institutionally compromised at the outset. It produced drama queens like Sadat. It was more a generational phenomenon.
Those who belong to the region and have first hand access are well aware of the situation on the ground.
It is now Islam (and Christianity if its adherents overcome their Judeophilia) Vs Judaism.
Pick your side. Better still, stay out and concentrate on your own affairs.
Arab Nationalism and Baathism managed to blend the positive aspects of traditional Arab culture (including the religious values) and style with modernism, in a way that was certainly more tactful than either Bolshevism or Liberalism.
Islamism on the other hand, methodically destroys everything specific, refined, peculiar, aged, in other words, interesting, authentic and worthy of existence, and replaces it with a standardized mono-culture which is as barbaric as it is aberrant and anti-human. Saudi Arabia portrays very well the Islamist end-game – a country and a culture which is known and distinguished by *absolutely nothing*.
>It is now Islam (and Christianity if its adherents overcome their Judeophilia) Vs Judaism.
No. It is now Whitey vs Everyone else on the planet. My race is my religion. It should be yours as well.
@Arthur Konrad
Saudi Arabia portrays very well the Islamist end-game – a country and a culture which is known and distinguished by *absolutely nothing*.
Islam and Arabia occupied by the House of Al-Sodom are two entirely different entities; that it [Sodi Arabia] is a materialistic and hedonistic backwater is quite obvious.
“Saudi” Arabia portrays nothing but Sunni supremacism that equates Islam with Arabism, which is nonsensical to say the least.
@Sherman McCoy
It is now Whitey vs Everyone else on the planet.
That is also correct. The demonization of the White race is deplorable. Whites have been the biggest victims of Globo Homo.
My race is my religion. It should be yours as well.
My religion protects and nourishes my race/community/social existence.
‘Pick your side.’ Indeed. You have picked yours, and that’s fine. But I don’t understand why you try to engage with white nationalists.
@Middle Class Twit
But I don’t understand why you try to engage with white nationalists.
Because, firstly, I consider their struggle moral and righteous, and would like to see them prevail over the Judaic Globo Homo.
Secondly, their [Whites] tormentors besides having a sizeable number of traitorous Whites at their disposal also have non-White agents who are strategically embedded within the power structures of many non-White nations. Hence, when Globo Homo weakens on its home turf, their agents, naturally, scramble and find themselves weakened like their Satanic (((masters))).
Thirdly, there is massive communicative distortion between the native Whites who seek a dignified life for them and their descendants and native non-Whites who love their own soil and hearth and reject the modernist (((market)))-driven “immigration” regime.
Unfortunately, due to language barriers, the presence of scum [groomers, sexual predators, etc.] among diaspora populations, and a dishonest (((academia))) and area (((experts))), the room for respectable dialogue has become highly constricted.
Lastly, as someone who understands the West’s language(s) and social dynamics almost as good as his own and approaches it [West/Europe] without academic swindlers of any kind, I think I am in a position to detect foul play and distractions [like the ones bombarded during the 90’s and aughts: “Islam vs West”, “Judeo-Christian” civilization vs (mustache-less) bearded Militants] that are deployed to frustrate a moral and righteous struggle.
Well, Arabs deserve it. This is retribution for their betrayal of the Ottoman Empire in the First World War. Let them thank Colonel Lawrence and their own leaders like Faisal and Auda, who rebelled against the Sultan, who was not just a Türkish ruler, but a Caliph and Keeper of the Holy Cities. Perhaps they wanted some kind of independence, but they only got new colonial masters – the British and the French, who divided their lands in a way that was beneficial to them and put their puppets in power.
There would be no conflicts in the Middle East if the Ottoman Empire continued to exist, or even if it itself granted independence to the Arab tribes, but in accordance with their interests, and not with the interests of the British and French empires. All the oppression of the Türkmenler (Turkomans) in artificially created Syria and Iraq, the conflict between Jews and Arabs in Palestine, as well as the constant quarrels among the Arabs themselves are the results of the defeat of the Ottoman Empire and the Sykes-Picot pact.
Personally, I have much more sympathy for Israel, and this is not even because I somehow particularly sympathize with the Jews, but because I frankly do not like Arabs. By the way, Nihal Atsiz, who disliked Jews before the WWII, too, after the creation of Israel, sympathized with the Israelis, not the Arabs. And Alparslan Türkeş, not long before his death, uttered the famous words “Palestinians and Arabs are the enemies of the Türks.” (Filistinliler ve Araplar Türk düşmanıdır).
Judging by what the Arabs in Syria and Iraq have done and still are doing with the Türkmens of Halep and Kerkük, respectively, Türkeş, of course, was right.
Of course this is not criticism of Lawrence. Lawrence was an Englishman and fulfilled his duty of a British officer. In HIS actions he was right. The traitors then were Arab separatists.
I’ve been meaning to reply to you. What is the reason for anti-Semites becoming pro-Israel? Sounds like a good topic for CC or some other dissident publication to do a deep dive on. I suppose that in certain respects that Israelis are a sort of “Aryanized Jew” in the sense that they have not only conquered but have subdued the Palestinians.
It’s not like the White Christians haven’t been helping the juice. How about we White Christians just stay out of it? If nothing else it will save several billions in aid to Israel.
The Palestinian cause is not worth supporting. But Zionism is a remarkable modern example of reconquista — the recovery of a nation’s true homeland from Islamic occupiers. And starting from a tiny population base — the original Yeshuv being a mere 5% of the Ottoman province! The Israeli Jews have gone on to create a robust flourishing ethnostate which, while containing minorities, unashamedly puts her own people first and foremost. Rather than joining the lunatic Mullahs and Ayatollahs in wishing the State of Israel destroyed, perhaps we can learn something from her?
@Vehmgericht
This “robust flourishing ethnostate” has White man’s sweat and blood behind it whose hearth, womenfolk, and energies the Epsteins and Maxwells of the world have been exploiting for centuries.
Indeed, a lot can be learned from these disgusting parasites.
The Israeli Jews have gone on to create a robust flourishing ethnostate which, while containing minorities, unashamedly puts her own people first and foremost.
Just so Nihal Atsiz thought after the creation of the State of Israel. In 30´s he said, “Jews are our unluck”. After 1947 he supported Israelis and sympathized to them.
@James Kirkpatrick
this degree of obeisance to their god…
What ‘degree of obeisance’ would be reasonable in your opinion?
There is no bargaining here.
Either one submits to Absolute Reality unconditionally or he/she submits to their own chiseled idols. No middle ground here.
None.
Not to sound like a libtard but I respect your position. Different folks. Different strokes.
Freedom of speech is non-negotiable in the West as far as I’m concerned. Freedom of expression… meh, less so IMO.
To answer Mr. Goad, I looked it up and the Koran mentions cow “excrement” in Surah 16:66.
“Not to sound like a libtard but I respect your position.”
Considering the alternative is getting your head lopped off, that’s a pretty reasonable stance. 😎
“Yes, unlike the rest, we do not play around. We take our faith extremely seriously.”
And yet after 33 years of fatwa you’ve only managed to get an eye?
I’ve seen worse injuries after a friendly bar-room brawl.
If this “fatwa” represents Muslims being “extremely serious”, it’s no wonder the rednecks keep kicking your butts across the desert, and up one side of the mountain and down the other.
@Bob Roberts
…it’s no wonder the rednecks keep kicking your butts across the desert, and up one side of the mountain and down the other.
Firstly, you are missing the whole point.
Secondly, if you take pride in the White man under orders from his Jewish masters bombing schools, wedding and funeral processions, homes packed with families, then should I also declare that, therefore, White domiciles and womenfolk have now become fair game for the Iraqi, Afghan, and other non-White immigrants and that they should continue their march towards White lands?
No, of course not. Thankfully, I am not that intellectually challenged.
When an Afghan dies, he has his family and tribe to give him an honourable funeral. The reader can make appropriate conclusions from here.
“Firstly, you are missing the whole point.”
No, I think I get the whole point just fine.
You think anyone who craps on your faith deserves to be stabbed and freedom of speech be damned.
I’m sure you’re Billy Badass but my question was why is it taking you so long to exact your fatwa?
Perhaps you can’t get it done because most Muslims actually realize how ridiculous it is to kill someone over words written in a book even if those words are seen as defaming that goofy religion (no offense)?
freedom of speech be damned
There´s no such thing as “freedom of speech”. At least, it is always restricted, because ANY society has its own taboos, just the taboos are different, so you can speak something free in one society, but you cannot speak about the same in another one. Of course, the enforcement could be soft or hard, and in different countries some taboos are very hard, and some are easily avoidable. In Europe you cannot deny “the Holocaust”. In Russia you cannot openly/publicly compare the Bolshevism with the Nazism, or criticize “The Great Patriotic War”, or condemn the invasion in the Ukraine. In the Ukraine you cannot openly/publicly argue for the agreement with Russia, for the official abandonment of the lost territories, or criticize the pro-West orientation or Maydan coup d´état. In Belarus it would be not good for you to openly attack Lukashenko, and in Türkey you cannot publicly criticize Atatürk.
And, well, freedom as itself is just a Freemasonic concept, one of the tools of Globalists. Before Spinoza, who has invented “Freedom”, and before Freemasons propagated it, there were no freedoms at all. In all traditional societies of native peoples of Eurasia (so-called Japhetihc or Nostratic peoples) there were no any freedoms, but only an hierarchical structure of societies.
@Bob Roberts
You think anyone who craps on your faith deserves to be stabbed and freedom of speech be damned.
Sir, what will be your reaction if someone dishonors, abuses, mocks, ridicules, derides you or your father/mother/siblings/loved ones in front of you? Will you grant him the right to “free speech” and ignore him? No. Your honor will demand that you smash his face.
Likewise, publicly caricaturing and ridiculing Holy figures [of any religion; it includes various paganisms too] should also carry painful consequences.
One can squeal and whine nasty things in his own hoghouse. But if one brings his nastiness in the public domain and spreads his vomit proudly, then, he will be responsible for what happens to him.
@Kök Böri
There´s no such thing as “freedom of speech”.
Remember, it is important to keep things in context. Freedom is a relative term and this discussion thread centers around the freedom to criticize the Muslim faith. Salman Rushdie was stabbed for writing his controversial book. In America I certainly have the freedom to speak critically of the Muslim faith with absolutely no consequences imposed by my government. In this context, that is the right to freedom of speech.
“And, well, freedom as itself is just a Freemasonic concept, one of the tools of Globalists.”
The globalists are more interested in abolishing personal freedom in the West and reinstating the feudal system with themselves as the chosen few in power. You know, like a “traditional” society.
@Muhammad Aryan
“…publicly caricaturing and ridiculing Holy figures [of any religion; it includes various paganisms too] should also carry painful consequences.”
Equating “Holy figures” to those tangible people in our lives whom we love the most is central to the gaslighting process of religions and it is integral to the creation of fanatics.
In America there is a saying that we all learn as small children. It goes “Sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never harm me.”
Stabbing someone for what they say is the behavior of children and I see no inspiration from God in it.
@Bob Roberts
this discussion thread centers around the freedom to criticize the Muslim faith.
Wrong. It is not about that.
Criticizing is different from the pouring of filth.
We can have an honest and dignified discussion where each presents his/her views like a sane grownup.
But ridiculing and mocking cross the redline.
This POS Rushdie, himself coming from a Muslim family, knew full what he was doing. He could have at least titled his sh*t differently.
But it was calculated mischief. And for that he was consequently rewarded by his (((masters))).
Lighten up, Francis.
@Muhammed Aryan
With your stabby tendencies it’s a good thing you aren’t a Christian. I’ve never seen a tax payer funded picture of Muhammed floating in a jar of piss, or a heavy metal t-shirt with a hijab wearing Muslim woman masterbating with a pork chop with the phrase “MUHAMMED IS A CUNT” on the back of it or Marilyn Manson posing for a picture with his dick in the Koran. Christians are subjected to a constant barrage of crap like this every day from every corner of our culture and amplified by every institution in this country, yet we don’t plant bombs at Slayer concerts or newspaper offices because we are not over emotional, entitled crybabies who respond to an insult with violence.
The Islam is simply about 600 years younger than the Christianity (and when we consider the Christianity as an official and established religion, then the difference is ca. 300 years), and so the Islam still has some vigour or, if you want, fanaticism, which the Christians have lost over all those centuries. When you speak about the Islamic fanaticism, you should compare the Müslümans of today not with the Christians of today, but with Christians of the Reformation and Counterreformation, of Thirty-years War, of religious wars of the French and of the English, with the Christians of Inquisition and Auto de fe, also with the 16th-17th centuries. The difference is, that the Müslümans still believe and do have their faith, however the Christians do not (s0me fundamentalist groups are exceptions, but they are called “fanatics” too). They are “neither hot, nor cold”, and the religion does not much matter for them. That is not bad, and that is not good, that is simply a chronological fact. An old man is almost always weaker than the young one. The Islam is younger and it is alive – for its believers, the Christianity is dead for most of its believers, almost an empty ritual and tradition without spirit. And here I do not want to emphasize, that neither the Christianity is the national and traditional religion for European native peoples, nor the Islam is the national and traditional religion for Euroasian native peoples like Türkic or Persians. You can wish the revival of ancient German/Celtic/Slav/Greek-Roman native “paganism”, I can wish the revival of Tengrism/Tengricilik, like Atsiz wanted it, but both is not very realistic.
After such news I always feel very glad that our great ancestor, the Massaget/Saka Queen Tomris or Tomiris Hatun, has defeated the Persian Shah Büyük Kiros and so we should not obey the orders from Qum.
It worked against Al Capone
https://www.getyarn.io/yarn-clip/1ba79ae7-507b-410b-8cb4-1b00d6a696a6
“Save ammunition, get in touch with the Proud Boys and learn how they did it in the Revolutionary War,”
FBI surveilance footage of Shiffer’s inspirational “fuck you optics, I’m going in” rant:
https://youtu.be/V8lT1o0sDwI
Send whatever words of wisdom to WAKE UP the Italians as their election is September 25, 2022.
Here is the info. gathered so far, please provide corrections if discrepancies are found. Italy has five parties that are pro-Italy for Italians:
-Lega
(email: [email protected]).
-Fratelli D’Italia
(email: [email protected], &, [email protected]).
-Forza Nuova
([email protected]).
-Cinque Stelle
([email protected],
[email protected],
http://www.movimento5stelle.eu).
-Casa Pound
(casapounditalia.org,
[email protected]
[email protected]
I believe Casa Pound has a Telegram account.
“Casa Pound”? Ha! I love it.
The American navel-gazing on CC is fun and all but I’d rather see a continuation of electoral success for the far-right here in Europe, where it matters most. Successes here will spread to successes in the USA, because we share a solidarity with the American white man.
Italy election Sept. 25, 2022.
Italians cannot be this stupid; the nation that produced Da Vinci, Medici, Fermi, Marconi, Volta, Torricelli, Michelangelo, Queirolo, Caselli, Volta, Cristofori, Cassini, etc. etc. etc. cannot throw their existence away, cannot throw their future away, cannot pass on Italy to their children as minorities, and, choose to be replaced by non-Italians. All Italy’s institutions including its government and media number one priority is the safe guarding of the Italian People, with everything else being a distant second. If they do not, then, they are betraying the Italian people. “ITALY MUST ENSURE THE EXISTENCE OF ITS PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR ITALIAN CHILDREN.”
The existence of Italians is non-negotiable. The existence of Italians must always be explicit.
An article that can help reclaim your nation is “The Slow Cleanse aka Restoring White Homelands” by Dr. Greg Johnson.
Rai-Italia is trying to normalize that non-Europeans can be Italian .
One factor that deserves its own book is lifespan of women and its impact on politics. A group of people with high openness and high agreeableness going from zero representation to outliving and outvoting another group in half a century would probably yield radical results. Instead of assuming italians, swedes, and britts, all hate themselves, maybe we just agree its the impact of affirmative action for women and their extended lifespans having an enormously irrational, effeminate impact on society, universities, churches, and families.
Exactly! This aspect of the demographic change has been rarely studied.
Once more, I’m at a loss of words.
2,000,000+ migrants apprehended this fiscal year.
100,000+ drug overdose deaths.
50,000+ suicides.
25,000+ murders.
Some indeterminate number of mRNA vaccine deaths.
The frog has been already boiled.
And war rages not only in Myanmar, not only in the Ukraine, not only in Ethiopia, not only in Yemen, but in all the favelas, barrios, and ghettos across the western hemisphere. While our ostensible leader Joseph Biden is off smelling children somewhere.
RE: Dog-faced woman
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Yjfi82Rata4
As far as I remember Salman Rushdie described Muhammad as hiring out the women of his harem as prostitutes and of himself as lying drunken in the gutter, both of which are entirely made up and understandably resented by Muslims.
But one does not need to make things up to criticize the prophet ‘s morality. The record provides enough material of its own.
Here is some information on the prophet’s immoral conduct: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Muhammad
And here is a list of all the people the prophet caused or condoned to be murdered, mainly for having “insulted” him: https://wikiislam.net/wiki/List_of_Killings_Ordered_or_Supported_by_Muhammad
The culture of Islam is a typical “honor/shame” culture in which an attack on one’s honor can only be avenged by violence, mostly murder. Such a culture may have been functional in 7th century Arabia, in our modern world it is highly problematic.
Whether Islam will be able to reform itself and adapt to the modern world has to be seen, the prospects are not hopeful.
“Whether Islam will be able to reform itself and adapt to the modern world has to be seen, the prospects are not hopeful.”
islam/Muslims/non-Europeans are NONE of our business. They have their homelands; we have ours. Had we this way of thinking we would not be in this extermination trajectory. Time to reclaim our homelands from Europe to Australia, &, embark on our break away civilization. Anyone who gets in the way are either the enemy or a traitor.
Correction:” …way is either…” not “…way are either…”
Islamic extremists ought study the “Streisand Effect” because now more than ever I’m curious to read this damn book by Salman Rushdie. A bit ironic that the book is apparently sympathetic to immigrants. Kinda rude to get all stabby.
The apocalyptic stories this week were lightened only by heavy menstrual flow. The author of the latest penis envy screed describes herself thusly, “Sarah Lehman lives in Northeast Pennsylvania with her partner, her cat, and her anxiety disorder.” I guess the only surprise there is that she isn’t living with 10 cats. Very interesting that the progression of articles goes from men to white men to ‘cis straight white men.’ Ms. Lehman surprises me in that she isn’t the least bit multicultural in her writing, not even as far as the Wikipedia page. She wants us to commiserate with how terrible white men are to her but failed to mention that in Iran about 50% of girls believe menstruation is a disease. In Nepal the practice of chaupadi regards menstruating woman as unclean, and they must be confined to a shed far away from their families (the native American Ojibwe women isolate to a ‘moon lodge’). But as this annoying chick is in NE Pennsylvania, that’s far enough for me, though there are plenty of other international locales she is free to move to if she thinks white guys make her period so bad. Perhaps the Cherokee have it right, seeing menstrual blood as powerful. It seems to have a power to claim injustice despite women’s sports leagues, women’s colleges and even women’s chess leagues (perhaps because some chess sets are ‘weighted’).
Its been proposed that menstrual products should be tax-free. Perhaps a reasonable compromise. Though toilet paper is taxed. After finding out that this is again the worst week yet my white male buddies are going to make sure its free to guys. Those “Bro Wipes”, too.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/05/menstruation-myth-why-are-african-women-still-paying-for-it
https://blog.flexfits.com/menstrual-rituals-around-the-world/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_and_menstruation
https://nypost.com/2015/05/16/lawmaker-wants-to-wipe-toilet-paper-tax-off-the-books/
Today, Monday August 15, 2022, RaiItalia had a show called “Agora estate” discussing the upcoming Italy’s September 25, 2022 election. An African was one of the commentators with Dario Galli from La Lega discussing the “flat tax”. It cannot be more simple than – Italy is not Italy without Italians. Asians, Africans, Arabs are not Italian. Apparently, the English have accepted Miss England 2021, now the globalists are trying to convince Italians that an African can be Italian. What good is a “flat tax” if Italy is no longer Italian. There is not much more to say, except, the Italian People as a collective are either accepting their own replacement, extermination, genocide, or, lack the ability in seeing how the decisions they make today will affect their posterity; will lead to their demise. Not unlike the French, British, Germans, Swedes, etc.
Recent polling has shown approximately 38 percent of Americans think there should be a decrease, but not a moratorium, on immigration. My question is this: What do White people really think is going to happen when we become a minority? Things are already terrible now. I remember immigration being a hot topic for a while, but it seems to not get nearly as much attention as it should. I don’t mean on here, but among normie conservatives. All I hear from them is “as long as it is done legally” or “Biden is the bad guy, not the immigrants.” There are some politicians saying encouraging things, but I will believe it when I see it. Time will tell, but one thing is certain: this country is not getting any Whiter.
If one Gallup poll is fraudulent, the whole organization is fraudulent. Immigration polls smack of fraud. Let’s just see that sampling data, Gallup. https://www.irmep.org/FOIA/Gallup/default.asp
Also, Rand Paul was on Fox today, commenting on open borders, his solution for which is “twice the number of legal immigrants that we have now.”
Thank you! I am ways surprised when dissidents use establishment’s statistics freely and with no qualifications. Like the number of Whos in America being 6-7 million. Like a wise guy once said, I am personally acquainted with more Whos than this!
The Last HuWhite Man review by the Lotus Eaters:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSlfxxbwMBI
We got totally hoodwinked in the post-Cold War malaise by the hypothesized ‘clash of civilizations.’ A bunch of neocon relics could not let the G.A.E footprint run fallow and have only recently admitted maintaining the ‘liberal world order’ is all that ever mattered, rather than fighting ‘terrorism’ or communism, which was never the reason for expanding ‘western’ hegemony. The truth is that Islamism was the last gasp of an increasingly secularizing Muslim world rather than an Arab Renaissance. Now that Al CIA-da and Israel Secret Intelligence Service have been virtually extinguished, mostly because one of them never actually existed and the other burned itself out, neocons are once again facing the same existential crisis they faced when the USSR collapsed. So these non-stories of these has-beens like Salman Rushdie aren’t furthering any flag-waving this time around. Normies don’t care anymore brown people fighting brown people. You guys need to fight your own wars and leave white people out of it.
What does the term “G.A.E.” stand for?
Global American Empire
Speaking of “…and He’s a Muslim, Too”:
Salman Rushdie is a Muslim.
He even publicly “reaffirmed his Islamic faith” during the height of the kerfuffle when the fat-wad was originally given. Didn’t help, unfortunately for him.
Salman Rushdie is the elusive “moderate Muslim” we keep hearing about.
SALMAN RUSHDIE: “I’m a hard-line atheist I have to say.”
It means, that when he died, when stabbed, he will not be a Şehid, and come to Paradise. Well, Şehidler ölmez, Martyrers do not die.
He was married to that Padma Lakshmi?
So Iranians are so much concerned because of a poet. But it is always curious for me, why, at all UN meetings devoted to the brutal oppression of Qazaqs and Uighurs in the East Türkestan, Iran and Pakistan invariably support China, and not their supposedly coreligionists? Maybe because they do not perceive the Uighurs and Qazaqs as “their own”, but see them as the descendants of the barbarians, Yecüc ve Mecüc. Or because China gives Iran and Pakistan money and weapons, and therefore Iran and Pakistan do not care about the concentration camps for Türkic Müslümans and other abuses of their civil rights in the East Türkestan? In any case, this once again confirms Nihal Atsiz’s correctness, especially in his article “İslâm Birliği Kuruntusu”, (Delusion of Islamic Unity), published in the magazine Ötüken, Nr. 4 (Nisan), 1964.
I don’t get it. Surely only a misogynist would have a problem with this:
https://www.scotsman.com/health/free-period-products-scotland-first-in-the-world-period-products-law-comes-into-force-in-scotland-3805537
Glad to see the free period products law is not gendered and anyone can get them suggesting that they correctly recognize that men can also have periods.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch…
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/raf-pauses-job-offers-white-130400154.html
Looks like Salman was in a big rush-to-die.
“When I saw that there were Sunny Muslims and Shite Muslims, I obviously thought the former would be much nicer than the latter. I’m not so sure now!” – Simon Harris
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment