3,016 words
To listen in a player, click here. To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save link as” or “save target as.”
Beginning in 1997, in an English town of more than 100,000 people, eight Pakistani men stood at the core of a group involving as many as three hundred suspects who abused, gang-raped, pimped and trafficked, by the most conservative estimate, well over a thousand of the town’s young girls for years.
The police were eventually accused of not just turning a blind eye, but of participating in the abuse — even supplying the Pakistani gangs with drugs and tipping them off when they heard of colleagues searching for children they knew to be in the gangs’ possession.
Others were afraid of investigating the gangs or calling attention to their behavior because it would have been politically incorrect to accuse the town’s ethnic community of such a rampant and heinous crime — in the words of one English writer, “Fears of appearing racist trumped fears of more children being abused.”
But when this story first broke, guess where it appeared?
Here’s how a blogger writing under the name Mehrdad Amanpour tells the story of how the story first started reaching people:
Some years ago, a friend sent me a shocking article. It said hundreds of British girls were being systematically gang-raped by Muslim gangs. It claimed this was being covered-up.
I’ve never had time for conspiracy theories, especially when they look as hateful as those in the article. So I checked the links and sources in the piece. I found an American racist-far-right website and from there, saw the original source was a similarly unpleasant website in the UK.
I did a brief search for corroboration from reputable mainstream sources. I found none. So I wrote a curt reply to my friend: “I’d appreciate it if you didn’t send me made-up crap from neo–Nazi websites.”
Some months later, I read the seminal exposé of the (mainly) ethnic-Pakistani grooming gang phenomenon by Andrew Norfolk in The Sunday Times.
I was stunned and horrified — not just that these vile crimes were indeed happening and endemic, but that they really were being ignored and “covered-up” by public authorities and the mainstream media.
The Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal first “broke” in the far-right blogosphere. The accusation they made was that these gangs were being allowed to operate undisturbed because everyone was too afraid of “appearing racist” to properly investigate them . . . and nobody listened to the far-right bloggers who were breaking this story because they were afraid of “appearing racist” if they gave any credibility to those far-right sources, too. Never mind that it seemed paranoid to rely on bloggers to report truths like these when the allegations were so wide-reaching, involving a literal conspiracy within the police force.
And yet, years after no one was willing to take them seriously, the far-right blogosphere turned out to be right.
Well over a thousand (mostly) white young girls were being abused by (mostly) Pakistani gangs.
And the authorities were covering it up.
We are now, once again, in the stage of an evolving scandal that Mehrdad Amanpour described his experience with above. Just to be clear, I’m not going to commit myself to the idea that this is going to be as huge as Rotherham was. We should be careful: we don’t know what would or wouldn’t be confirmed with a proper investigation. The question here is not whether we’ve gotten to the bottom of this online. The question is whether there is enough here to justify thinking there should be a proper investigation.
And the parallel with Rotherham is that the relatively small number of people asking for that are mostly the loathsome kinds of people who run “racist far-right websites.” So, since the claims are inherently conspiratorial, and the mainstream doesn’t want to be associated with those people who are talking about it, it is once again all too easy to just dismiss the claims out of hand as paranoia run wild.
Again, the evolution of the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal was an extremely painful lesson that the mainstream can be wrong and the “paranoid racist far-right” can be right. And that lesson was far too expensive to simply let go to waste.
The name of this scandal is Pizzagate.
It gets the name for two reasons: first, because at the center of the scandal are high-level Washington insiders who own a handful of businesses in the DC area, including a couple of pizzerias (Comet Ping Pong and Besta Pizza), who have fallen under suspicion for involvement in a child sex abuse ring. Second, because the first questions arose in peoples’ minds as a result of some very bizarre emails revealed by Wikileaks in The Podesta Emails that, quite simply, just sound strange (and usually involve weird references to pizza). One of the strangest emails involves Joe Podesta being asked this question: “The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related). Is it yours?”
The evidence is of wildly varying levels of quality, ranging from the pareidolia of “Jesus is appearing to me in my toast” to “wait, that’s actually pretty damn creepy.” The mountain of claims and observations and speculations being compiled in places like Voat and Steemit are too overwhelming for any one person to hope to wade through sorting wheat from chaff, and while I don’t intend to try, I will summarize some just a little bit of it here.
While many of these claims are wild speculation over coincidences (though by no means all of them are), at some point I think a bunch of weird coincidences involving pedophilia and kids becomes sort of damning in and of itself. In one email, Podesta is among those being invited to a farm and the host says, “Bonnie will be Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in [the] pool for sure.”
Could that have an innocent explanation? Sure, maybe. But inviting a group of adult men to a gathering and calling young children “further entertainment” while listing their ages is weird, whether it ends up having an explanation or not.
If I was getting messages that listed the ages of young children that would be in a pool . . .
And it turned out that the logo for my business contained a symbol strikingly close to the “little boy lover” logo used by pedophiles to signify that their interest is in young boys rather than girls . . .
And the bands that showed up at my restaurant had albums called All the Children with images on the cover of a child putting phallic-shaped objects into his mouth . . .
. . . and were found making creepy jokes about pedophilia (in reference to Jared Fogle: “we all have our preferences . . .”) . . . and there were Instagram photos coming out of kids (“jokingly?”) taped to the tables in my restaurant . . .
. . . frankly, I would start asking questions about myself.
Here are just a few of the more “institutional” coincidences involved in the story: one of the men on the small list of people found “liking” photos like this one on these individuals’ Instagram accounts is Arun Rao, the U.S. Attorney Chief, charged with prosecuting cases of child pornography.
Besta Pizza, the business whose logo so closely resembled the “little boy lover” logo, is owned by Andrew Kline, who was one of four attorneys in the Human Trafficking Prosecution Unit of the Department of Justice. Isn’t it just a little unusual that someone that high up in a human trafficking division would fail to notice the symbolism?
For yet another coincidence, Lauren Silsby-Gayler is the former director of The New Life Children’s Refuge in Haiti. It is a matter of public record that she was caught, prosecuted, and sent to jail while in that role for trying to abduct dozens of children, most of whom had homes and families. The main lawyer paid to represent Silsby-Gayler, “President of the Sephardic Jewish community in the Dominican Republic,” was himself suspected of involvement in human trafficking.
When the Clintons gained influence in the region, one of their first acts was to work to get Silsby-Gayler off the hook. Among the Podesta Wikileaks are State Department emails discussing their case. Meanwhile, she now works on the executive board of AlertSense . . . which collaborates with IPAWS to send out nation-wide Amber Alerts.
While some of the supposed “codewords” people have claimed to have identified in Pizzagate appear to be made up, there is at least one unambiguous instance: here is an Instagrammed photo posted by James Alefantis, the owner of Comet Ping Pong that appears innocent enough: a man carrying a young child with a beaded necklace draped around both of their necks.
The disturbing bit is that the photo uses the tag “#chickenlovers,” and “chicken lover” is in fact an established term to refer to a pedophile — someone who loves “chicken,” which is also unambiguously an established term to refer to underage children (you can see this in the gay slang dictionary subset of the Online Dictionary of Playground Slang).
Complain all you want about the “speculative” and “paranoid” online discussions of Pizzagate, but when you have clearer-cut cases like this one where James Alefantis absolutely, unquestionably did in fact post a photo of a man holding an infant and the one and only hashtag he used for the photo involved a term that unquestionably is a reference to pedophilia, in a context where it is clear that there is nothing else here that “chicken” could possibly have been referring to, the likelihood that more speculative claims might have truth to them is increased.
There is a 1994 documentary exposé on NAMBLA (the North American Man/Boy Love Association) called Chicken Hawk. Here is yet another reference from a watchdog group from 2006, proving that this one existed well before Pizzagate surfaced. Another confirmed fact dug up by the paranoid right-wing conspiracy nuts on the Internet?
So here are a few more things we do know. We know that Bill Clinton has taken dozens of international flights on a plane colloquially known as the “Lolita Express” with Jeffrey Epstein, a man who spent 13 months in jail after being convicted of soliciting a 13-year-old prostitute. We know that Hillary Clinton’s staff knew that Anthony Weiner was sexting underage girls all the way back in 2011 — and covered it up. Guess whose laptop revealed evidence that Hillary Clinton went on flights on Jeffrey Epstein’s “Lolita Express” along with Bill? That’s right: Anthony Weiner’s.
Now do you understand why the mainstream media was so eager to spin these emails as just a “distraction” during the election?
The staff that ignored Weiner’s sexting of young children included John Podesta himself, whose brother Tony is one of the very men at the center of Pizzagate. Tony Podesta has rather warped tastes in art. For instance, he owns a bronze statue of a decapitated man in a contorted position identical to a well-known photograph of one of serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer’s victims:
Creepy Tony Podesta with bronze statue of Dahmer sex crime/cannibalism victim
(See here for the disturbing photo of the real victim.)
The same news story that features the image above also mentions the fact that John Podesta’s bedroom contains multiple images from a photographer “known for documentary-style pictures of naked teenagers in their parents’ suburban homes.”)
Furthermore, Tony Podesta’s favorite artist is Biljana Djurdjevic, whose art heavily features images of children in BDSM-esque positions in large showers. Here’s one with a row of young girls in a shower with their hands behind their backs in a position that suggests bondage:
Here’s one with a young boy in a shower tied up in the air with his hands over his head:
In addition to Jeffrey Epstein, the Podesta brothers are also friends with convicted sex offender Clement Freud as well as convicted serial child molester Dennis Hastert.
We do know that the New York Times, which is now dismissing Pizzagate in its entirety as a hoax, is run by Mark Thompson — who was credibly accused a few years back of lying to help cover up a scandal involving another high-profile public figure involved in child sex abuse, Jimmy Savile, during his time as head of the BBC.
And we do know that this has happened before.
Lawrence King
Lawrence King, the leader of the Black Republican Caucus, who sang the national anthem at the Republican convention in 1984, was accused by multiple claimed victims of trafficking and abusing boys out of the Boys Town charity for years. You can hear the chilling testimony from three people who claim to have been victimized by King in a documentary produced shortly after the events transpired.
You can hear the FBI, even after they received extensive testimony from victims, explain in their own words that they weren’t going to prosecute King because if anything were wrong with him, he would have been prosecuted by a lower authority already. Eventually, King was found “O. J. guilty” of abusing Paul Bonacci — convicted in civil court, acquitted in criminal court.
The best written source for information about the depths of corruption and cover-up involved in this scandal is Nick Bryant’s The Franklin Scandal: A Story of Powerbrokers, Child Abuse & Betrayal (if you can’t find a free copy on your own, contact me through my website, www.zombiemeditations.com and I tell you where to find it).
Could all of this turn out to be nothing?
Of course it could.
But that’s not the question here. The question is how we should respond to the possibility.
Do we take the possibility seriously? History clearly indicates that we should. Even if it did turn out to be nothing at all, I would still be more proud to belong to a community willing to take the possibility seriously and call for investigation than I would to belong to a community that dismissed the possibility far too hastily and luckily turned out to be right — even as it did this and turned out to be wrong in so many cases like Rotherham before.
The real horror here would be to live in a society that responded as Reddit has — by shutting down the whole conversation entirely, banning r/pizzagate even while keeping subreddits like r/pedofriends, “a place for (non-offending) pedophiles and allies to make friends with each other!” alive.
Over on his blog, Scott Adams asks us to keep in mind cases where confirmation bias did lead to false allegations of institutional pedophilia, to caution against excessive confidence. (He hastens to add: “I want to be totally clear here that I’m not saying Pizzagate is false. I see the mountain of evidence too. And collectively it feels totally persuasive to me. It might even be true. I’m not debating the underlying truth of it. That part I don’t know.”)
But which is worse? If all the evidence coming out of Pizzagate is entirely false, what have we lost by spending time on it? On the other hand, if even five percent of the allegations that have been made surrounding the topic are true, what have we lost by ignoring them? Which is worse: spending too much time pursuing and thoroughly vetting false leads, or looking the other way while any amount of child abuse goes on?
According to the FBI’s National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database, nearly 470,000 children disappear in the United States alone each year. This number is dubious for a number of reasons. It looks like some number of runaways end up in the NCIC count, and to make matters worse, repeat offenders can make it into the data multiple times. So that would suggest that the real number must be lower than this tally; but on the other hand, we also know that many missing children are never reported in the first place, so it’s possible that that could boost the number back up. The bottom line, however, seems to be that there is no reliable way to determine how many total children are actually missing in the U.S.
Either way, though, even if correcting for these errors took out 90% of the disappearances in the NCIC database, and there were no unreported disappearances to account for at all, I think even the resulting 50,000 per year would still be enough to call the problem systematic and justify suspicion that these disappearances could well involve organized efforts—given that we already know of so many pedophile rings in so many powerful institutions.
In 2013, Canada busted a ring involving more than 300 adults, who had teachers, doctors, and nurses heavily represented among them. A pedophile ring has just been identified in the highest levels of UK football (Americans know the sport as soccer). Norwegian police also just uncovered a ring of 50 organized pedophiles mostly working in the tech sector, once again including elected officials, teachers, and lawyers. The Vatican scandals can practically go without mention — institutional involvement in child sex exploitation is nearly an a priori given.
And the children that are being raped and murdered in the photos passed around by these child porn rings are coming from somewhere. And when figures like politicians, teachers, and lawyers are involved in the rings, it’s hardly inconceivable that they could be involved in disappearances.
Have we identified one here?
Only time will tell. But we deserve to be paid attention. We deserve to have the matter taken seriously. And we deserve a media bringing the most relevant facts to our attention after having actually done some due diligence on the matter, which we do not currently have. The mainstream media has lied to us long enough about things like Trump having only a 1% chance of winning the election that the public has increasingly woken up to this fact — which is why Pizzagate is getting so much more attention than the Franklin scandal did. If Pizzagate turns out to have even a single-digit fraction of truth behind it, it may not just bring down the Clinton machine and Democratic Party, it may sound the death knell for the mainstream media as well.
27 comments
Fantastic breakdown, Aedon. Bravo.
Good Lord. Evil has surely infected the West. We need to strong men to root it out.
Another well written piece, Mr. Cassiel. The contrast in tone between this and the NYTimes take on this matter is stRiki-Eiking. I agree with your conclusion, this deserves to be investigated and I hope certain authorities are doing just that. To dismiss this as “fake” and political is an injustice to our society.
Here´s something that isn´t clear to me, regarding the scope of these numbers: let´s assume that in the USA, every year 3 million children are born (calculation: assume 300 million inhabitants, average life time 80 yrs, , i.e. 1% of inhabitants die per year, i.e. same number born). So 1 out of 6 children each year disappears. So every third family has lost a child by disappearance. So that´s 25 million families in the US out of 75 million families that have lost a child by disappearance: I have never heard of ONE such case ever in my life in my whole social circle
(BTW the link leads to some http://www.icmec.org/ which doesn´t seem to be “FBI’s National Crime Information Center (NCIC) ” ) .
Anyways: pedo killing of children seems to happen far more often than I assumed. I wonder why it should not be possible to rally huge parts of the population with this subject because that subject, the own children, affects everybody on the most primal level possible. Mothers are known to perform the impossible in order to protect their child. It´s inconceivable that they all should cuck no matter what shaming tactics are applied.
” I wonder why it should not be possible to rally huge parts of the population with this subject because that subject, the own children, affects everybody on the most primal level possible. Mothers are known to perform the impossible in order to protect their child. It´s inconceivable that they all should cuck no matter what shaming tactics are applied.”
One would think you’re right, but Rotherham clearly shows this not to be the case. Hundreds of families silenced, intimidated and harassed, often by the police themselves. This is more than just abuse; this is essentially a form of creeping genocide and slo-mo extermination.
Just to clarify, I was using ICMEC to support the claim that the numbers rise to 800,000 with cases with benevolent explanations included. But it does look like the 466,000 number is really uncertain. See my comment here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teeKyx91rbM
A pizza owner arrested and charged with child trafficking earlier this year.
Interesting, in the context of all of the rest of the information discussed in this article.
Aedon Cassiel has written a most important article. The average White doesn’t know anything about this. And when I was reading the Podesta emails that Assange released I was surprised to see a big shot in Stratfor using, what appeared to be, code words.
I think of how the mainstream media, Jewish to the core, has for 70 years called Hitler every evil thing in the world, None of it true of course. Yet these creatures who run the Fed, Hollyweird, the Glass Toilet, Wall Street and have so impacted our educational system as to make it an arm of their destruction of our race are the creatures who are REALLY what they accused Hitler of being. Adolf Hitler was a moral man, something the Deep State Tribe can never be.
On November 9, 1921–just five days after the Battle of the Hall (Saalschlacht) where fewer than fifty SA Men had beaten back more than 400 communists and Jews who had tried to disrupt Hitler’s speech in the Festival Hall of the Hofbrauhaus–Adolf Hitler addressed a gathering of SA Men. The following is what he told them:
“nearly 470,000 children disappear in the United States alone each year.”
I call complete bullshit on this.
http://www.missingkids.com/KeyFacts
Yeah, you’re correct. I was considering working up a correction when I noticed that it was oversimplified, but it would probably work just as well to post it here.
It looks like some number of runaways do indeed end up in the NCIC count, and to make matters worse, repeat offenders can make it into the data multiple times. So that would suggest that the real number must be lower than this tally; but on the other hand, we also know that many missing children are never reported in the first place, so it’s possible that that could boost the number back up. The bottom line, however, seems to be that “Unfortunately, there is no reliable way to determine how many total children are actually missing in the U.S..”
Either way, though, even if correcting for these errors took out 90% of the disappearances in the NCIC database, and there were no unreported disappearances to account for at all, I think even the resulting 50,000 per year would still be enough to call the problem systematic and justify suspicion that these disappearances could well involve organized efforts—given that we already know of so many pedophile rings in so many upper institutions. In addition to all the other cases of such I listed in the essay, Norwegian police also just this past week uncovered a ring of 50 organized pedophiles mostly working in the tech sector (source), but once again including elected officials, teachers, and lawyers. And the children that are being raped and murdered in the photos passed around by these child porn rings are coming from somewhere. And when figures like politicians, teachers, and lawyers are involved in the rings, it’s hardly inconceivable that they could be involved in disappearances.
Speaking of which, I don’t want to post any particular source for this because each one I find makes me uncomfortable relying on it for some reason or another, but if you search “Podesta Madeline McCann”, there are a number of coincidences suggesting the possibility the brothers could have had a role in her disappearance. The key point is that Clement Freud, the convicted pedophile who I mentioned in the essay the brothers remain close friends with, has a mansion less than a mile away from where the young girl disappeared in Portugal. We know that the Podesta brothers traveled there on occassion, there’s reason to think they may have been there during the month she disappeared, and the police sketches look disturbingly identical to both John and Tony Podesta—see here for a side by side comparison. See also: “Emails between ‘paedophile’ Clement Freud and Madeleine McCann’s parents to be probed for child sex abuse inquiry.”
There are a couple other small details that came out confused in the essay that I should mention. The discussion of art begins with Tony Podesta, and implies that everything that follows in the discussion refers to Tony rather than John. In fact, the reference to someone having a bedroom lined with photos of “documentary-style pictures of naked teenagers” applies to John Podesta. Now, when you add things like that to something like the emails listing childrens’ ages and calling getting in a pool with them “further entertainment,” it starts feeling less innocent. I could picture a scenario in which I list my childrens’ ages and innocently refer to them as “further entertainment” for guests. But if those guests were people who keep photos of naked children in their bedroom, if they were close friends with high–profile pedophiles and even traveled around to visit them, I might be just a little bit more on guard about the language I was using and whether I was actively inviting my children to jump in pools with them.
Clement Freud died about seven years ago.
Your point is well made, though. The Podestas did remain close friends of him. And they look uncannily like the photofits.
As a note on the use of the word “pool”, I never took it to mean a body of water, but a grouping of individuals, or a “pool” of “enterntainment”. Or maybe it means a structure with a diving board, who knows.
There is too much here that has at least circumstantial evidence that in cases of other people would warrant an investigation. The main fear here is that there is a push for no investigation to take place because of the power of those implicated. Which in turn is frightening, because should there be no worries an investigation will uncover something, and will in fact exonerate someone, why not just do it to quell people’s concerns? Overall, this would be the best and most responsible course of action. So to me, there is at least some fear there is something to find, hence the push to deny, deny, deny. I am appalled at how quickly the label “fake news” has been applied and with how broad a brush has been used. Ignoring potentially real news is just as irresponsible as promoting inaccurate news.
It’s totally happening. It is just circumstantial evidence so far, but the sheer amount makes it impossibe to think all this is a mere coincidence. AC just gave a glimpse of the seriously f*cked stuff that was dug out. The NYT piece gave an extremely dishonest representation of the case being made by the internet sleuths, which is suspicious in itself. If you think of it, this could bring down the highest peaks of the establishment. And AC didn’t even mention “Spirit Cooking”. That’s Alex Jones level for sure, but it appears to happen as well. At the very least one more evidence of Tony Podesta’s taste in extremely twisted art.
This is what I can remember off the cuff without even trying:
– The British elite covered up for Jimmy Saville.
– There were very credible but never fully substantiated rumors that the Belgian authorities covered up for an elite European pedophile ring. The ring was thought to centered around the serial killer and pedophile sadist Marc Dutroux, who claimed he supplied to children to the European elite (If you’ve never heard of him, gird yourself before reading up on him).
– The American FBI agent Ted Gunderson who investigated abuse claimed there was an elite pedophile ring operating in the United States.
– Numerous actors have claimed they were sexually abused by members of the Hollywood elite. The old “pedowood” threads on /pol which some readers here may remember contained a lot of original, crowd-sourced research on rampant pedophilia in Hollywood.
– Child pornography is interestingly enough popular in the US intelligence community.
That’s just the tip of the iceberg; there are unquestionably numerous examples proving that the authorities in various countries have been known to cover up for pedophiles and child murderers. Obviously, the people in involved in this activity are capable of anything.
My feeling is that even if you take away the junk, disinfo and items for which there easily could be an innocent explanation, Pizzagate has generated many legitimately suspicious findings. Nevertheless, it will difficult to impossible to prove the allegations because if the allegations are true these pedophiles are protected at high levels of power.
How would an investigation even start without identifiable victims? It’s not a crime to own depraved “artworks” or to post repulsive but nevertheless legal images of kids.
The twentieth anniversary of the ‘White March’ in response to the Dutroux case just passed, one of the most significant displays of public dissatisfaction with those who corruptly govern us. In stark contrast to the stage-managed state propaganda of the Charlie Hebdoe march in Paris this mass display of the Belgian public occurred without any publicity at all, simply by word-of-mouth.
I have often thought how odd it is that we seem incapable of replicating it, even while our people are now subjected to ongoing depredations on a daily basis. The reaction of the public here in Britain to the Rotherham revelations was pathetic. The Labour Party even retook the Rotherham constituency at the general election.
Will we ever get another White March? Anywhere?
I believe the Andrew Kline of the human trafficking dept is not the same one that owns Besta Pizza. Check that out tho. I have read it a couple of times on Voat or similar. Also, as far as the codes go, i think that Cheese Pizza has been confirmed to mean Child Porn (CP) by a dark web researcher. The evidence for this is found in a short Reality Calls video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsAmSqMgbsU
As for the rest of the codes, I have found no evidence that they mean what many/most online punters have said they mean.
Very good, objective summary and analysis.
This is the most concise, non-biased account of this that I have come accross. David Seaman appears to be the mouthpiece on social media with gettingn the word out. Have you considered contacting him?
How DARE MSM declare PIZZAGATE …. (drum role here) … A “Conspiracy”! Main Stream Media lap dogs w horing for Soros really think we buy their pure BS? Remember what MSM said about Jimmy Saville and the hundreds of little boys he tortured, raped and killed.100% TRUE. The vile FRANKLIN cover up. Another horrific scandal that was debunked by our corrupt MSM. The story? 100% TRUE. The Despicable Catholic archdiocese of Boston scandal …. Totally debunked and buried, But thanks to the Boston Globe HEROIC Journalists, It was was uncovered. 100% TRUE. The vile and satanic Hastert Scandal, MSM did it’s best to call that a “fake story”.. 100% TRUE. Jerry Sandusky and the Penn State scandal. Joe Paterno said ” can not be true ‘.. MSM called it a “witch hunt”.100% TRUE. Now the UK soccer scandal … Horrible rapes and abuse of young soccer players …. Oh how the media tried to bury that one for decades .. Guess what folks .. 100% TRUE. The Clinton child sex ring uncovered on Weiner’s lap top and the evil, satanic abuse of babies at Comet Pizza, Besta Pizza and CPS. Guess what? MSM is calling it A “Fake Story”. .. Soros owned Snopes Says it’s “UNTRUE”. Howard Kurtz from Fox News called it a “witch hunt”. How DARE he not stand up for God’s innocent! We the good American people are FED UP with slimey pedophiles in high places The abuse, rape and torture of our babies. Anyone out there with kids, grandkids, nieces, nephews, cousins that you care about, Let your voice be heard loud and clear. Those babes without a voice need us. God Speed!
Anne, those “heroic” journalists at the “Boston Globe” were Jews who seized an opportunity to harm the Catholic Church. That was the only reason they did what they did. They don’t care about Catholic or any other Goy children. If the scandal had been in one of the Jewish – controlled establishment organisations, they would have been part of the cover-up just like the rest of the controlled MSM.
Indeed. Pedophilia is rampant among the Hasidim, but families of victims have been conditioned to allow their children to be victimized, instead of turning in their lecherous old rabbis.
I thoroughly appreciate the two sober articles thus far on Pizzagate, having first read (and commented in) the second installment. I hope follow-ups will be published.
Two additions to my comment in the second installment:
1. The “chickenlover” Instagram post is frankly, damning. For a gay business owner to use this phrase on a public (now locked) social media account, we can reasonably assume his social circle 1) understands the esoteric slang, and thus is familiar with an illegal, extremely taboo “subculture” 2) uses pederast slang and humor in private 3) and thus, probably makes even more risque references in private, as can be inferred with any display of humor 4) is comfortable using this slang in the company of and about infants they know (who are the parents?).
Moreover, a Wikileaks email in the Clinton/Podesta leak contains the following joke: “sacrificing a chicken to Moloch.” The word chicken here, in reference to the esoteric deity, to whom children were historically sacrificed to, takes on much darker connotation knowing the Alfantis is within the Clinton’s’ social circles and jokes about a “chickenlover.”
In a separate Alefantis Instagram photo, the words “Molech Machine” are glimpsed handwritten on a piece of paper, and are visible but not the primary subject of the photo, almost seemingly included as an insidery wink/joke. Molech is an alternative spelling of Moloch, as seen on Wikipedia. So Alefantis is also familiar with Moloch, a deity of blood libel-level child sacrifice.
2) In this article, Jared Fogel, the Jewish former spokesman of Subway is referenced, because he was found guilty of possessing child pornography (a ton of it). While I admittedly haven’t researched the Fogel case, it is inexplicable that such a highly public marketing personality could operate in these waters without drawing a hammer down sooner. Subway, of course, is a Jewish-owned business, and is supported by many Hollywood Jews. For instance, post-Fogel gate, Jonah Hill was photographed carrying Subway, in a strategic press photo-op (TMZ et all).
Like Sandusky at Penn State, Jared Fogel seemingly took a fall that should have implicated many powerful people. But did not. Somehow, Jared Fogel did not become a perennial late night talkshow joke like Michael Jackson, Marv Albert, Hugh Grant, and Bill Cosby, whose indiscretions pale in comparison.
I am beginning to believe this is the criminal tapestry of a lifetime. As the article stated, the lives and memories of countless children are at stake. Surely the FBI, and Putin, know more about this tapestry than 4chan.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.