1,142 words
“Gentlemen, despite the heroic efforts of Michael Tracey, Richard Hanania, Patrick Casey, Nick Fuentes, and others among you, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor fell today, a victim of CHUD moralism. We must redouble our efforts to quash this moral panic. As you go forth, always remember that we are fighting for the most vulnerable. Politicians, bankers, and crowned heads are counting on you. Not one of the Q-tards we fight is ever troubled by the question, ‘What kind of world are we leaving for Goldman-Sachs?’ That’s what makes us better than them.”
—Some group chat somewhere on X
The phenomenon of Right-wing Epstein apologists and minimizers frankly baffles me.
Let’s begin with a thought experiment.
I hold in my hand a thumb drive containing information proving that the only people implicated in criminal activity by the Epstein files are Jeffrey Epstein and Gislaine Maxwell. Would I release this evidence to the world? After all, it would be a huge relief to the likes of Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Ehud Barak, Les Wexner, Noam Chomsky, Woody Allen, and other bigwigs, allowing them to carry on their good works untroubled by torch- and pitchfork-waving peasants whipped up into a moral panic by fervid online “conspiracy theorists.”
This is me, dropping the thumb drive into one of Epstein’s barrels of sulfuric acid.
Why?
I’m a dissident. I welcome anything that disrupts the current power structure. I welcome the delegitimization. I welcome the chaos. Every minute the establishment spends on damage control from the Epstein case is a minute not spent doing further harm to white people.
Beyond that, the Epstein case is a glimpse into how a hostile Jewish elite subverts and controls white elites through their vices. I’d welcome a chilling effect on that cozy relationship. I want ambitious whites to be afraid of being seen with people like Epstein, not clamoring for their favors. The next time Bill Ackman or Miriam Adelson or Paul Singer invites a political striver to dinner, I want him to wonder, “Will I be accused of eating babies for breakfast because of this someday?”
The Epstein drama is also a mini-“Day of the Pillow” for the upper levels of our gerontocracy. I welcome the redistribution of wealth and power to younger generations, who are often less deluded and corrupt.
Even if the Epstein files were entirely fictional, I would do nothing to suppress them, simply because, on balance, this crisis is good for White Nationalism. I’m not going to lie about Epstein. But neither would I lift a finger to exonerate him and his friends. If their whole world went up in flames, I’d just toast marshmallows.
My position on the Epstein files is analogous to my position on abortion. I think abortion is murder. The arguments offered for it are almost entirely specious. The people who advocate for it are almost entirely monstrous. But I will not lift a finger to stop it, because in the United States today, abortion works to delay the day when whites become a minority.
Beyond that, as David Zsutty has pointed out, there’s a whole lot of reason to think that crimes were committed by people besides Epstein and Maxwell, and every reason to think that whatever kompromat they gathered was being shared with Israeli intelligence. It is perfectly reasonable for people to want to know more.
Why then are online dissidents staking their credibility—such as it is—on apologizing for, or minimizing, or deflecting for the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and associates?
You can buy Greg Johnson’s Is America Doomed? here.
The most innocent explanation is that they are trying to protect Donald Trump. Trump, after all, has orchestrated the whole coverup. They’re just being good MAGA soldiers. They’ve been convinced that only Trump can save America. They are convinced that releasing the Epstein files might impede that. Now that the files are out, they are trying to soften the blow.
I too want mass deportations and a secure border. I too want DEI to be rolled back. I will grant that Trump is doing good things. I want them to continue. But they will not continue unless the Republicans retain control of the Congress in the 2026 midterm elections and retake the White House in 2028. That looks increasingly unlikely, precisely because of Trump. Thus, sooner or later, the more MAGA Republicans are going to start thinking that, since Trump is blowing it anyway, it might be good for Trumpism and their own personal ambitions to have Trump step aside. At that point, the Epstein revelations will come in handy.
So even the best argument of the Epstein apologists doesn’t hold water.
What are some of their other motives?
I am sure that people like Patrick Casey, Richard Hanania, and Michael Tracey are auditioning for jobs as courtier journalists.
Nick Fuentes may simply be compromised.
Others might be reverting to their conservative priors. Conservative pundits love to LARP as guardians of the establishment, even though it is firmly in the hands of the Left. They have a horror of populism because it is lowbrow, conspiratorial, and seething with resentment. I, by contrast, think it is beautiful. I regard “Q-tards” as cannon fodder and thank them for their service.
Still others seem to regard the whole Epstein affair as merely a chance to differentiate their dissident infotainment brand from other dissident infotainment brands by quibbling about minutiae. It’s about market share.
Bitterness also plays a role.
Bitterness comes from suffering, especially suffering injustice, especially if one gets no help or sympathy. It can warp one’s soul. Bitterness is a form of neurosis, a chip on your shoulder that you carry forward with you. Because of bitterness, any reminder of the cause of your suffering will trigger pent up suffering and anger. In our movement, it is easy to be bitter against schizos, wignats, CHUDs, etc. Once they trigger you, it is tempting to defend the opposite of everything they say, just to get back at them. Yes, it sounds absurd. But so is the spectacle of Nazis white-knighting for Mossad agents like Epstein and Maxwell.
There’s also a great deal of bitterness against women. A significant segment of the online Right has a “Bros before hoes” attitude whenever men are accused of sexual crimes against women. In this case, their chosen “bro” happens to be Jeffrey Epstein. Yes, it is odd that they don’t sense how unseemly this is. This suggests that they are in the grip of neurotic embitterment.
By releasing the Epstein files, the American political establishment is behaving like Lord Denethor, dousing himself in oil and mounting his funeral pyre—and online Rightists are rushing to pour cold water on it. I hope that future historians will not record that the system’s enemies were less concerned with political victory than with scoring online points: triggering feminists, one-upping rival podcasters, and quibbling about the age of consent.
70 comments
It is a paradox that reading an article about so depressing a subject can be so enjoyable. A tribute to Dr Johnson’s gifts both of thought and expression.
What is CHUD moralism? What kind of autistic twitter term is that?
CHUD is an antifa insult against White Nationalists, which some White Nationalists now use as an insult against the “wrong” sort of White Nationalists who take things like the Epstein files seriously.
Chud def: a low class, unwashed White Nationalist, a wignat; a WN given over to lunatic conspiracy theories, much the same as schizo or paranoid.
DON’T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO MY ORIGINAL POST BUT IT LOOKED SOMETHING LIKE THIS:
C.H.U.D. Cannibalistic Humanoid Underground Dwellers
From a 1984 horror-comedy film distributed by Roger Corman Productions and starring John Heard and Daniel Stern, about hazardous waste disposal in Manahattan sewers and the homeless people that live in or near them. It spawned some forgettable sequels.
🙂
Here’s what Michael Tracey tweeted after Epstein’s “suicide”:
August 10, 2019: “How was Epstein not on the most intensive suicide watch protocol available???”
August 11, 2019: “An inmate who had been incarcerated at both places once said that he found Guantanamo “more relaxed” than the Metropolitan Correctional Center, where Epstein was held. Former SDNY prosecutors say they can recall zero suicides there in recent history… ”
August 12, 2019: “If one of the highest-profile inmates in the US penal system was being ignored, and normal procedures were being flouted, then those seem like more than a “series of missteps””
August 21, 2019: “Eight different Bureau of Prisons officials, including supervisors and managers, all knew Epstein was under strict orders not to be left alone in his cell — but he was left alone in his cell”
October 30, 2019: “Forensic pathologist says in 50 years he’s never seen injuries like the ones Epstein experienced in a suicidal hanging”
Amazing how someone can state these facts and then a couple of years later change his tune and claim there was nothing to the whole Epstein business after all.
August 10, 2019: “How was Epstein not on the most intensive suicide watch protocol available???”
Because the prison was run by incompetent blacks like the ones who slept through his suicide.
August 21, 2019: “Eight different Bureau of Prisons officials, including supervisors and managers, all knew Epstein was under strict orders not to be left alone in his cell — but he was left alone in his cell”
And since no one entered or left his cell that night he couldn’t have been murdered.
October 30, 2019: “Forensic pathologist says in 50 years he’s never seen injuries like the ones Epstein experienced in a suicidal hanging”
That shady Jewish pathologist is working for Epstein’s brother who’s suing NY state for major shekels.
“Because the prison was run by incompetent blacks like the ones who slept through his suicide.”
Why should the most important prisoner in recent NYC history be put in a prison known to be run by grossly incompetent people? Do you believe they have no functional prisons in New York City?
“And since no one entered or left his cell that night he couldn’t have been murdered.”
Why should a man who loved living as much as Epstein and was mostly innocent (as you seem to believe) hang himself?
Furthermore, the surveillance tape released by the FBI showed 1 minute missing. Later, the FBI claimed that the original tape was destroyed on their orders and at a later point “reconstructed”, in which case there would be no valid evidence left to argue either side.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mystery-of-the-missing-minute-from-epstein-jail-solved/
“That shady Jewish pathologist is working for Epstein’s brother who’s suing NY state for major shekels.”
If Epstein had been murdered, surely his brother would want to know who was behind it i.e. this works both ways.
Why should a man who loved living as much as Epstein and was mostly innocent (as you seem to believe) hang himself?
Epstein apparently “loved living” as a free man. Realizing he’d never breathe free air again must have disheartened the hell out of him. He was also being shaken down for $ by the inmates in a very depressing prison where the inmates sometimes go days without being let outside.
And no I don’t believe he “was mostly innocent”. I merely responded to Mr. Johnson’s rhetorical question about having access to fictional evidence that somewhat exonerated Epstein.
Furthermore, the surveillance tape released by the FBI showed 1 minute missing.
So one minute was unaccounted for? Obviously it would take more than a minute for men to open his cell door, strangle him and stage it as a suicide.
“Epstein apparently “loved living” as a free man. Realizing he’d never breathe free air again must have disheartened the hell out of him. He was also being shaken down for $ by the inmates in a very depressing prison where the inmates sometimes go days without being let outside.”
Epstein died 5 weeks after being incarcerated. That wasn’t even nearly enough time to conclude there was no way out, especially given his previous slap on the wrist and all his friends in high places.
If the prison in question was so bad, he would have tried to use all his lawyers and connections to get into a better prison.
Instead of inventing implausible reasons why he would have killed himself, why not consider the very plausible reasons for his handlers/associates to kill him to prevent him from talking?
October 30, 2019: “Forensic pathologist says in 50 years he’s never seen injuries like the ones Epstein experienced in a suicidal hanging”
And it’s complete bullshit. (((Dr. Michael Baden))) is one of those pricey New York – Hollywood celebrity forensic pathologists that you hire to find the Grassy Knoll that you are looking for.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Baden
I’ve studied reams of autopsy reports investigating mostly Holocaust-related issues like carbon monoxide poisonings, and that invariably documents things like suicides and hangings, etc. What was surprising to me is how common suicide by hanging is and how easy it is to pull off, just a shoelace and a doorknob in most cases.
What I specifically wanted to know with my research is how likely are asphyxiations with diesel engine exhaust, since this rarely contains significant amounts of carbon monoxide.
Well, the answer is that CO poisonings and death are very common (especiallyduring hurricaine season) but it is almost undocumented by medical examiners that it has ever occurred accidently or otherwise with diesel engines.
I found one famous example of an 84-year-old suicide of a man with emphysema and it still was not a CO fatality.
You can speculate about a lot of possible murder weapons fbut if things don’t happen ever, not deliberately nor accidentally, then they are so improbable as to be close to impossible.
So the Holocaust Industry has changed their story on a lot of their core canon. Germar Rudolf handed them their hats about commercial pesticide use in German camps, and my friend Fritz Berg did so about diesel engine gas-chambers.
Anyway, back to Epstein ─ it doesn’t really matter if there was a serious suicide watch on him or not. I’d say no since the jails are full of Dindu guards, and whether he might off himself or not was less of a priority than to anyone else besides Q-tards.
Furthermore, even with rigorous scrutiny, this is not impossible ─ maybe not even too difficult for the determined.
At the 1946 International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Dr. Robert Ley managed to hang himself while sitting on the toilet under 24-hour suicide watch in their cells. They probably thought that Dr. Ley, who was a jovial Nazi always surrounded by good-looking women, was just constipated trying to pass the fine prison food.
🙂
One other element I think is the perennial “contrarianism” which characterizes many right dissidents; it’s perhaps what led quite a few to this side of the pond in the first place. You see the whole world ganging up on someone and then, regardless of the exact circumstances, instinctually symphatize with the subject of hate – “etiam si omnes, ego non”.
“The phenomenon of Right-wing Epstein apologists and minimizers frankly baffles me.”
I detect a similar level of irrationality among some of these people as among far-out conspiracy theories themselves, which is ironic.
Looking at it from this angle, I would try to explain this anomaly the following way:
The original & core Epstein story was massively expanded, becoming a conspiracy mythology comparable to JFK assassination lore. The conspiracy nuts have claimed “Epstein”, basically. This means that anyone who doesn’t want to have anything to do with fringe conspiracy theories will not get near the Epstein story, in fear of being “tainted”. I think that to closed minds, “Epstein” is now too strongly attached to an abyss of conspiracy madness that they absolutely do not want to touch. If they admit that the Epstein story is true, it feels like opening the door to unlimited levels of schizo insanity – Epstein like a “slippery slope” or a gateway drug or something like that.
Put differently, admitting that the Epstein story is true now feels like admitting that Pizzagate and other madness (from their perspective) is at least plausible – it feels like giving all crazy conspiracy theories a +10 points in credibility. This is what triggers closed minds who absolutely refuse to believe that conspiracies beyond a certain scope could be possible. Hence, they have to oppose the Epstein story, to avoid the conspiracy snowball-effect they fear.
It’s comparable to Leftists not wanting to admit that George Floyd wasn’t killed by police.
You are right that people care about being tainted by association. Conspiracy theorists of the slop variety are annoying, but conspiracies do happen. I fully understand the psychological impulse of influencers wanting to not shift into the Candance Owens territory, where she wins through charisma, cultish behavior and experience.
I always liked this perspective from Murray Rothbard on conspiracy theories. It comes from a libertarian Austrian school perspective, but he’s remarkably defensive of them.
Here’s also good article where Rothbard goes into more detail. He defends conspiracy theories by the fact we all recognize small scale conspiracies (shallow) conspiracy theories with ease. The example he gives is Steel companies lobbying for Japanese steel tariffs, that’s clearly plotted and done for selfish reasons, and everyone knows it. It’s just taking what’s shallow and applying it to deeper elite networks, which is intuitively the right thing to do. Why exactly would conspiracies stop at a certain level? Why wouldn’t there be “deep” conspiracies embedded in elite institutions?
Praxeology (the axiomatic grounding of Austrian economics, where humans are all rational actors with self interests) basically contends that “deep” unseen conspiracies must exist. The same rational self serving behavior that drives certain people at workplaces to sabotage someone else, disseminate false information, or work together in white collar crime doesn’t just disappear after a certain level.
https://mises.org/mises-daily/conspiracy-theory-history-revisited
“All government, in its essence, is a conspiracy against the superior man: its one permanent object is to oppress him and cripple him. If it be aristocratic in organization, then it seeks to protect the man who is superior only in law against the man who is superior in fact; if it be democratic, then it seeks to protect the man who is inferior in every way against both. One of its primary functions is to regiment men by force, to make them as much alike as possible and as dependent upon one another as possible, to search out and combat originality among them. All it can see in an original idea is potential change, and hence an invasion of its prerogatives. The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic personally he is very apt to spread discontent among those who are.”
― H.L. Mencken, A Mencken Chrestomathy
“Praxeology (the axiomatic grounding of Austrian economics, where humans are all rational actors with self interests) basically contends that “deep” unseen conspiracies must exist. The same rational self serving behavior that drives certain people at workplaces to sabotage someone else, disseminate false information, or work together in white collar crime doesn’t just disappear after a certain level.”
Good point.
The difference between reasonable conspiracy theorizing and conspiracy ideology would be that the proponent of the latter assumes, per default, a centralized conspiracy by his ideological enemies – whereas the former extrapolates upwards from self serving conspiracies on lower levels, which means a pluralistic conspiracy cosmology at the elite levels rather than “Conspiracy Monotheism” where 1 Satanic force stands at the top of the pyramid orchestrating everything!
That’s right. Good explanation. George Orwell said that such people as you describe, who resist plain facts which contradict the party-line, suffer from Protective Stupidity. There is a lot of Protective Stupidity among the loony left-wingers and their enablers.
This is what makes this scandal a perfect storm. Epstein writ large is obviously a Jewish production and when it all comes out it will make a serious dent in Jewish Power, which makes it tailor made for us. But it also has a kind of Me Too vibe which will keep the media all over it, though in the end they will have cooked their own goose.
Thanks.
I am enjoying this spectacle so much that I find it baffling that anyone would want to talk about something irrelevant . . . like how we really need to lower the age of consent . . . and how we really should be ashamed of ourselves to want to keep rich men from having sex with minors.
It’s wonderful to see the A-list degenerates switching into full panic. Bill Gates just pulled out of a high-profile Indian AI Summit. Lex Wexner is saying he was conned. With Prince Andrew doing a perp-walk, Bill and Hill are probably getting fitted for adult diapers.
Great article! Marshmallows are good! Abortion is good if non-Whites are doing it, and I hope that they do it every time they get pregnant; Darwin needs all the help he can get. Did I say that marshmallows are good? 🙃
I would add another factor: edgy nihilism and the e-fads it produces.
Epstein has become an another meme to copy, spread and cause outrage. “Aura-posting” synergizes with damage control and sycophancy from other elements on the “Right”, producing a bizarre festival of denial, bragging and status-signalling amplified through social media.
After watching the American E-Right for around a decade I’m not surprised at those developments. Idealism is on a steep decline and cynicism is soaring to new heights, this is not exclusive to online Right, but a feature of the entire System as public trust and morality plummet (along with median IQ). The Epstein Case becomes just another show in a burning theater, farmed for “takes”, clicks and engagement.
I’m a dissident. I welcome anything that disrupts the current power structure. I welcome the delegitimization. I welcome the chaos. Every minute the establishment spends on damage control from the Epstein case is a minute not spent doing further harm to white people.
Chaos is also welcomed by men who simply want to watch the world burn. Many of them hate the System, but don’t care about anything that could replace it too. There is no positive vision, only sadistic joy from the decline.
“Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats.”- or idolize the ruffians and scoundrels at the top who could do as they please and got away with it for long time.
“edgy nihilism and the e-fads it produces.
Epstein has become an another meme to copy, spread and cause outrage.”
Highly pertinent when it comes to discussions on X, for example.
Epstein denial (or Epstein glorification) is a form of rage-baiting. Calling out the Epstein conspiracy is not controversial anymore, turning Epstein into a hero is outrageous and so draws attention.
This is well said. When people recognize the manipulation, will they turn away, though? Are there a lot a bored people with empty lives who have nothing better to do than follow the Fuentes telenovela?
I think that the system purposefully gives attention to what they consider “acceptable opposition” within WN spaces. This tends to involve:
1) Ambiguously White-ish characters presented as thought leaders (Fuentes is 81% European according to his public DNA test results, Hanania is an ethnic Palestinian, Bronze Age Pervert is half Jewish, etc.).
2) Anonymous accounts which constantly say the most extreme, vile, and crass things possible in order to push high quality Whites away.
3) An effort to divert the movement’s focus into historical discussions about WWII, the Confederacy, the Roman Empire, etc.
There’s also a great deal of bitterness against women. A significant segment of the online Right has a “Bros before hoes” attitude whenever men are accused of sexual crimes against women. In this case, their chosen “bro” happens to be Jeffrey Epstein.
The conspiracy theorist in me wonders whether this is partly by design. Auspill recently made a video in which he discussed how a journalist reached out to him and, after acting very friendly and respectful, tried to bait him into making inflammatory statements about women. He went on to say that he’s convinced there is a concerted effort to transplant America’s gender issues into Australia.
That isn’t to say there aren’t resentful men, because there are, but I think it’s likely that this issue is being purposefully exacerbated by those who want to see White Advocacy fail.
Nick Fuentes may simply be compromised.
It’s also likely, imo, that there are individuals in the “Russian WN echo chamber sphere” who have been compromised. Scott Ritter, a man who regularly says that Russia should bomb Germany, was caught attempting to solicit sex from an undercover cop who he thought was a 15 year old girl. It wouldn’t surprise me if Russian intelligence has dirt on Ritter.
Thanks. I agree that our enemies seek to promote the worst actors, forces, and memes in our movement.
I haven’t looked into the Epstein case much, but from what I’ve seen in the media, I was struck by how pathetic the sexual offenses seemed. I would have expected the corrupt elite to commit such acts in grand style, like in the movie “Eyes Wide Shut.” I was very surprised that Prince Andrew had to resort to sneaking around with Ms. Guiffre, a rather plain girl. Shouldn’t his royal status and vast wealth have attracted very good looking youngish women like moths to a flame?Perhaps this case mainly shows that the sexual utopias of the baby boomers did not come true. Neither those of the 1960s, nor the more vulgar ones of the 1990s, with rich guys and models in bikinis writhing around Caribbean swimming pools. Eppsteen may have promised his friends that he would finally make these sexual utopias a reality for them, but it all ended in embarrassment.
Epstein was friends with supermodels and there’s evidence some of them were working with him / for him as prostitutes. Just look at his emails with Lana Zakocela (a Latvian supermodel who has many connections in Europe and has worked with celebs like Robert Pattinson). This is what Zakocela looks like:
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTUoNxZStCptI8_gvrL_ZdxmuwGAm_zHgHmLVr-J25M7hVipVTjzq8hCjW_9noFD7vUBzpdkfzUiWUOtgAIP7hMBJcd9kZ3nBOQDIgoECPR2Q&s=10
Not a “plain Jane.” And here’s an email she sent to Epstein:
hey Jeffrey,
How are you?
I’m still working in Switzerland. Swiss are using me, like usually Germans do..hehehe its so cold here in
Zurich,snowing..:)
Just couple more days, then coming back to NY.:)
Are you having fun on your island?
big kiss
xxx
Source: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00751768.pdf
Epstein’s other emails refer to “my Germans” and imply he was getting insider information from well connected officials. Quite an interesting coincidence considering Zakocela’s comments about Germans and Swiss.
There are other emails between Epstein and Anil Ambani (who was, at that time, the wealthiest Indian in the world and the 6th wealthiest man globally) in which he implies he would connect Ambani with “a tall swedish blonde woman.” Ambani replies by saying “Arrange it.” Then Epstein asks if there is a model or actress who represents his preferred type. Epstein goes on to say that, “I am glad you prefer young blondes to old ones.” That conversation is available here:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01209003.pdf
It looks like Epstein was a perverted pimp who provided clients with whatever they wanted. If they liked supermodels, he would make that happen, if they liked underage girls (who he could use to blackmail them) he would arrange it. On a personal level, he was yet another Jew with an obsession with young blonde women.
I was very surprised that Prince Andrew had to resort to sneaking around with Ms. Guiffre, a rather plain girl.
I think the appeal of Giuffre was that she looked young and had an “early teen” build (small breasts, trim body). This is a pic from her late teens:
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/c1a654c1efc006a9396155aeffbe7bb2b5c4b27c/0_56_2242_1793/master/2242.png?width=445&dpr=1&s=none&crop=none
A 17 year old that’s built like a 14 year old could, for men who like young teens, act as a gateway to worse things.
In all fairness much of this info is not my own research. ContraryIan has been producing excellent videos on the Epstein case and his TikTok is def worth watching. I would recommend everyone reading this check out his work.
This is a very useful comment. Thanks
Thank you, I really want to see the continental Eurocrats get exposed because there’s immense evidence they were involved but, so far, they’ve been largely ignored by the press. Virginia Giuffre claimed that Jean-Luc Brunel (who owned and managed multiple modeling companies in France) was one of the worst traffickers in Epstein’s circles.
It’s a Wiki page, but it’s well sourced: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Luc_Brunel
When you add in the emails, it looks like Epstein and Brunel were running a prostitution ring in Europe and there are probably a large number of senior German and French politicians, businessmen, etc. who participated in it.
You’re right, the European press is trying to blame it on a few degenerate aristocrats and protect the rest as best they can. So far, it’s working well.
I don’t understand the fuss about Prince Andrew and Ms. Guiffre who, if she was 17 at the time, weree both of legal age to fornicate their hearts out.
What happened between Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre wasn’t comparable to a run of the mill case of prostitution involving an older man and younger woman. This video by ContraryIan is a good intro to the Epstein issue, imo:
https://www.tiktok.com/@contraryian/video/7608422966254112030
Epstein appears to have been running a honeypot operation involving rich and powerful people.
“It looks like Epstein was a perverted pimp who provided clients with whatever they wanted.”
Confirmed re Maxwell as well: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246381.pdf
“MAXWELL says that she is willing to set HATT up with men, women, boys and girls. Whatever or however many he wanted. MAXWELL would recite it as though it was a menu. MAXWELL was completely serious.”
This was the main “service” they would provide to rich clients. Their business model, basically.
I think that in these cases, it is necessary to distinguish between what was promised/intended and what actually happened. I think that Eppsteen’s business was primarily based on hiring models as “hostesses,” fashion promoters, dancers, or other paid participants in his parties on the islands. A proportion of top models work in this way, getting paid large sums of money just to attend a party and have their photo taken there. Their presence is intended to act as a magnet for wealthy guests from the worlds of business, media and politics. Many of the victims apparently expected to be paraded around Epstein’s parties, but they did not expect to have sex with his guests. This seems to have been the main “misunderstanding”. From what has been made public, it appears that Epstein tried to seduce many of these girls, but only rarely succeeded. Epsteen then had several real prostitutes as a backup option, whom he employed as “masseuses.”
Fuentes may indeed be compromised, and in fact almost certainly is. The fact that he went untouched after the Capitol riot in spite of urging the crowd to storm it- though not going in himself- is beyond suspicious. However, even if he wasn’t, he still would probably support Epstein. In Epstein he sees a truly kindred soul- an arrogant, sociopathic, malignant narcissist who has contempt for women. He probably also commiserates with Epstein, having had his own sexual abuse scandals- Latino Zoomer and Ali Alexander, anyone?
I’ve hated Hanania and known he was an utter shit since he went under the name “Richard Hoste” and wrote for Takimag and Richard Spencer’s old AltRight.com site. I remember he was repeatedly shilling for Islam and saying he wanted it to conquer the West. I remember when he wrote a particularly loathsome pro-Islam article and Srda Trifkovic wrote a rebuttal article absolutely destroying him, after which he never appeared on AltRight.com again.
As far as I can tell, Hanania for instance, stands for nothing at all anyway. Guy is just a weird self meme.
As others have said, fatigue with conspiracy types and influencers who see conspiracies everywhere may be a factor with some, and not just conspiracies, but the most fantastic kind. Topics instantly become a sea of stupid crap.
But yes it’s the opposite end of the problem to say Epstein is a low brow nothing.
I’ve gone back and forth on different aspects of Epstein as I’ve read different information. I’ve tried to form a picture based on facts. I’d say it paints a damning picture of elite Jewish life, and that’s the problem with it. Mossad may well be the case one way or another, but it’s actually the cherry on the cake to me. The first problem here is Jewish life, and its sprawling entanglement with non-Jewish elites, and the shield it enjoys.
If former Prince Andrew ends up taking the most heat, I would call that a path-of-least-resistance injustice.
An interesting thing is the public don’t like it at all. They have a very strong feeling about it. If someone was in the files, even if they didn’t do anything other than talk to Epstein, they want that person cancelled now.
I think we should use this.
I hold in my hand a thumb drive containing information proving that the only people implicated in criminal activity by the Epstein files are Jeffrey Epstein and Gislaine Maxwell. Would I release this evidence to the world?
This is me, dropping the thumb drive into one of Epstein’s barrels of sulfuric acid.
If you did that you’d be covering up the truth, causing fake history to be widely believed and causing some people in our movement to waste the coming decades in a fruitless search to “connect the dots” linking this or that person to Epstein.
Jews and globalists are involved in so many outrageous scandals that we don’t need to invent phony ones to attack their credibility.
Yeah, not pouring cold water on this inferno.
Fake history and phony scandals look completely different. They lack corroboration, lack logic, mess up timelines and talk about things that are not related to the existing power structure.
The Epstein scandal is close to the literal opposite. It’s wildly incorrect to lump it together with Mae Brussell nonsense or theories based on cryptic Q Anon messages.
For example, here’s what one of the FBI’s confidential human sources (CHS) has to say about the Epstein nexus and its connections to Russia: https://21stcenturywire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/FBI-CHS-Reporting-Document.pdf
Great article! I at least hope the white knight pedo apologist brigadiers are getting paid for their troubles. Can you imagine doing it for free? I didn’t get why Dante’s 9th circle of hell is so much worse than the other layers, until realizing the true punishment is spending eternity in the company of groypers and Richard Hanania 😉
OK, so I’ll put on my conspiracy hat for once. There’s been scuttlebutt that some influencers are getting paid to promote Russian propaganda. Likewise, could this at least be a partial explanation for the Epstein boosters?
My take is that the “brothers before harlots” explanation would work for a flimsy #MeToo incident, but this is about a worm like Epstein and the wormy characters he “entertained” on his island. This was an Israeli honey pot op that generated metric tons of kompromat on powerful and influential figures. We’ve heard about sexual blackmail of politicians for ages, and now here are the ugly details at last.
I don’t think it is implausible.
It is documented that Right-wing influencers were paid Russian propagandists.
Others took money to promote sports betting.
They are a eager whores for attention, clicks, and bucks. And yes, big money went into setting up Epstein. And much more is invested in Trump. I would be shocked if various infotainers had not been paid to shill, deflect, soften, distract, etc. Huge investments are at stake.
So far, Vladimir Putin’s talent scouts haven’t approached me. Come on, Volodya – I can freshen up some old propaganda posters and put them on my blog. I’m great at that stuff!
We Whites under-react to racial threats. It is a grave flaw. We will not survive as a race by going on the way we have been going.
Despite this, we have reacted to our threats vigorously enough and often enough so that we are still here. So what is it that we react to enough that sometimes this pulls us back from the brink of destruction?
Kevin MacDonald investigates this historically in Separation and Its Discontents. Generally it hasn’t been the intellectuals that have been saving us, and the response of the clergy has also been overly flawed. It’s been stuff like this, and the popular response to it, that has saved us from destruction. It’s been the Jewish trade in slaves and Jews having access to White women. It’s been things like this, things that the “best” people wink at but that the great mass of Whites hate and want a real response to.
Greg Johnson is absolutely right, and we should not be trying to stifle the natural, and vital, popular response to a real and important scandal.
One wrongheaded thinkpiece among very many on this topic.
The Epstein story sickens me, but in a different way.
Even if others among his guests did committed crimes that actually to be on the books (rather than for what might be more properly called “statutory consent”), why the fixation on these offenders in particular? It’s the perennial untermenschen, Temple of the Golden Pavilion spleen against the powerful and successful: for the very reason that they have the good things in life, that they are happy and like being happy.
“I want ambitious whites to be afraid of being seen with people like Epstein, not clamoring for their favors. The next time Bill Ackman or Miriam Adelson or Paul Singer invites a political striver to dinner, I want him to wonder, ‘Will I be accused of eating babies for breakfast because of this someday?’”
This cordon sanitaire, of course, would not be limited to visiting power brokers from the tribe, but would have to include every playboy, every bon vivant known for the fun and the babes that gather at his pad. Even if our rising stars gained cred with the untermenschen thusly, and became the new elite, what would we have? Rule by a sexually repressed, puritanical, misandrist elite.
We may think we’re just skinning some hostiles, but we’re validating the belief system they’ve propped up. A free White nation, where men are shamed for wanting prime aged mates, and where even the elites can’t have their share of the fair as their prime compensation, is an oxymoron. It is the serfdom of our race to a false morality that denies the natural goodness of sex with the most fertile females. Do you think Whites, or any race for that matter, are going to begin choosing marriage and procreation again, when sex is treated as some evil that is inflicted on consenting mates that can already have babies? Saying you want power, and will continue doing that, shows that the truth means nothing to you and your movement. We claim we want change, but pledge to keep delivering the same. Let our race die, just alone in its own bed.
It goes without saying that ideally, leading Whites shouldn’t have to fly to some island owned by an Israeli agent to pork hawt girls. Didn’t kill himself wasn’t catering to some perverse niche; finding women like this attractive is very basic stuff. Were there even any call boys on the island for sodomites? By National Geographic standards, Lolita Express tastes are wholesome. Far from wanting to make getting enough action of this kind even harder, it to be possible for our elites to do so openly, precisely as the result they can expect for a life in public service or in the business world. And not as hookers to be passed around, but as harems of young loves who can bear their kids. Once a legitimate option to attain fruitful sexual satisfaction is in place, then we can focus on discouraging fornication and prostitution: it helps to have a right way to get something if you want to stop the wrong.
Anti-Epstein means chasing down the last straight person. Be worthy of freedom, and discard this slave morality! You think the Jews are exploiting our vices, and blackmailing us? We as victims have to stop consenting to their moral guilting. We have to stop tearing up when someone discovers we want sex—including sex with attractive young girls—and that we are glad if we have had it, and grateful to the girls who said yes. Then let them try and blackmail us—our chains will have been broken at last.
Bascically: Nietzschean looks at the mobs coming for Epstein’s buddies and says, “That could be me!”
Who said sociopaths lack solidarity?
It’s a servile, one-way solidarity. Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t showing equal regard for the goyim.
The ruling system depends on a synthesis of sociopathic neoliberalism and puritanical wokeism. This seemingly creates absurd contradictions, but the current system has so far drawn strength from them. Neoliberals used sexual hedonism as bait —in the 20th century sex was to be dangled as a reward for success in front of corporate slaves (white men) and for the broader plebs it had to work as a catalist of consumption.
But then feminists (a movement founded by aggressive lesbians) were unleashed, with the aim of criminalizing all male sexual desire (in the language of genderists, virtually any heterosexual act can be described as rape and equated with pedophilic abuse). This was no coincidence, but rather the right mix of consumerism and intimidation (carrot and stick). The whole thing is based on a general slave mentality, against which white nationalists must oppose an aristocratic morality that is driven neither by carnal desire nor by fear but by virtue and loyalty.
Age of consent laws are not feminism, puritanism, or slave morals. They are there to protect immature people from being sexually victimized by creeps.
While they’re all three, most of all, they’re just irrational. I need only mention Brooke Shields to demonstrate that many or these “immature people” were the apogee of womanhood years before they were what the law would call old enough.
There is already a totally routinized way of confirming decisions for minors: parental consent.
Whether or not the parents of Epstein’s girls knew what they were up to, the whole situation could have been avoided easily. A match with the richest, most well-connected, and I am sure in many cases quite charming types invited to the island, even as a second wife or as a long-term mistress, could make a girl set for life, and in a sane society would be seen as a rational choice for the parents and their girl, as well as the elite man.
To return to the article’s header: the guy who just got arrested was Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Prince Andrew! Even if he did do some wrong here, think about it. A literal British prince, eighth in line for the throne, really had to resort to shady connections to sleep with a prime aged girl? In what kind of messed up world? If you gave middle and high schools across the UK or US the opportunity, does anyone doubt there would be throngs of 10/10s who would love a relationship with the guy, even as one among many? Imagine if the marriage and succession laws were different: they could all be literal PRINCESSES! Whatever the girls’ ages, if the guy’s character was at all acceptable, parents would be nuts not to give two thumbs way up.
This blueblood is in the dock because we’re living in the inversion of all values.
A friend of mine who was a libertarian spent a year at Cambridge and came back a Trotskyite. He just hated the snobs. I’m getting it.
Do you mean us to infer you found Brooke Shields in Pretty Baby (1978), age 11 at the time of filming, appealing for purposes of sexual activity?
You mentioned Aristotle. I’ll bring up Plato. He argued in The Laws that it was morally permissible to protect society by executing incurable psychopaths. Pedophiles who act on their Satanic impulses, and who are the worst recidivists accordingly to all criminology data, are clearly in that number.
Rape is not a feminist construct; many societies across vast distances of time, place and culture, all incompatible in terms of values, have nevertheless converged on the idea that rapists deserve severe punishment, often up to and including death.
Plato saw certain criminal conduct as evidence of a diseased soul. Execution was therefore justified to protect society and set an example to others.
The reason men like Andrew, Epstein and Gates had to stoop to coercing defenseless girls for sex is obvious. They could control children and adolescents from broken homes who would not otherwise touch them.
There is nothing irrational about that. And to the extent certain older adolescent girls that have the physical, emotional and intellectual maturity to consent to and understand what sex means, potentially incurable disease, pregnancy, single motherhoid, hurt feelings and emotional pain, they don’t desire sex with you, Andrew, or Epstein. Their thinking is geared toward the young males in their own age group.
Healthy sex naturally seeks its own level. It’s only the irrational or depraved that don’t see it or don’t care. So we can hope that justice finds Epstein’s friends now that Epstein himself is in the soil.
“This blueblood is in the dock because we’re living in the inversion of all values.”
We all saw that “blueblood” as a frankly stupid buffoon, stumbling over his words, not as an aristocrat to be admired.
Same for Epstein, who got where he was propped up by a tribe focused on ethnic nepotism more than individual excellence.
Nietzsches envisioned his higher types as truly impressive individuals. Akin with what Jefferson termed natural aristocrats.
Both Andrew and Epstein have more than enough of a media footprint to dispel any notion of genuine worth surrounding them.
You must really revere today’s way of things if your sole criterion for judging someone’s worth is how high on the social ladder they end up being (“end up being” instead of got bc none of the two were any sort of self made men)
True, but they should not be draconian laws either ─ especially since there really is a difference between 8-year-olds and 16-18 year olds ─ and especially with completely unlimited statutes of limitations on some crimes that go far beyond looking after the interests of the victims now that they are thirty-something ex-whores.
Furthermore, sex-offender registries are useful tools but they are useless if they are not nuanced somehow.
Moral Panics are not some big catchall for justice, especially if based on lies and innuendo.
There have been cases of White Nationalists who have wound up with kiddie porn somehow found on their laptop ─ the mere posession of which is a major Federal crime.
It then becomes your burden to proof that you and not a vile (((opponent))) put it there when the computer store geek removing your latest laptop virus finds it and is required to call the police.
Some of this underaged pornography is animated (how do you age-consent a drawing?) or AI generated, so there aren’t even any real victims ─ other than that it obviously constitutes harmful abuse materials for potential predators.
The point is that moral panics can easily be used against people for other kinds of Wrongthink like Racism and anti-Semitism. I am not in favor of decriminalizing “victimless crimes,” but all crimes should be based on solid facts and not on questionable “thoughts.”
I’d like to think that the First Amendment gives me enough protection that I could attend a Charlie Kirk event (if I wanted to) without Marxist University professors getting me dismissed or jailed because he was called a “White Nationalist.” Even Jared Taylor had to jump through hoops and pay for rigorous security against BLM and AntiFa ─ as if to speak on campus was our ingulgence to his kind.
I do have nothing but schadenfreude at seeing Milords like Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor do the perp walk. We all assume that he is not blameless ─ and we are probably right ─ but can they prove it?
That is ultimately problematical for anyone, although having the ability to pay off homely stalkers is probably a big risk factor that most of us will never have. Thank God for Special Prosecutor Ken Starr finding out about Monica’s blue dress. Boy howdy!
So while it is just fine with me that the suspicions on ex-Prince Andrew and many others like him bring down their good names, titles, and prestige, I strongly question whether a “changing of the guard” is going to make a weaker Establishment cabal that is already irredeemably hostile to authentic White interests.
If anything, the “new turks” promoted from the Day of the Pillow will likely only be even better at their jobs, and the system surely knows it.
🙂
Exactly. Elite indulgence is more hypocritical for the other side than it would be for us. It’s like making money: done in plain sight is usually honorable, under the table or in back alleys usually not, and with us unlike with the levelling egalitarians, it shouldn’t have to be hidden at all.
Seeking “an aristocratic morality that is driven neither by carnal desire nor by fear but by virtue and loyalty”? Yes. But as Aristotle said in his Ethics, the mean for pride for the greatest, is simply to demand the greatest share. He did say honors are what the great pursue most, but how better to can the honorer show earnestness than including, ahem, some nubile pleasures as part of the package? Lauding someone to the skies, but not being willing to give him something valuable or even allowing him to enjoy it, is what we call hollow praise.
The more you talk, the more I sympathize with the Jacobins.
Why don’t you just admit you’re a Jewish pedophile?
And these are our betters:
How Decadent And Depraved Is The Ruling Class? | Return of Kings (theredarchive.com)
A bunch of Nietzschean Overmen, right?
And another thing that deserves its own post. Countless posters across the web have claimed the NSDAP stopped all these Weimar child brothels. Did they know that, by Epstein island standards, the NS Germans RAN child brothels with 15-year-olds for their troops in WWII?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_military_brothels_in_World_War_II
So? Is that in and of itself prove a whole system is evil, and should collapse? Are we better off because the Allies immolated the “satanic pedophiles”, 1940s edition? If you don’t think so, that’s exactly the point. That we encourage, or even consider playing along with these childish narratives, shows how much the White nationalist movement is becoming more an echo, less a choice every day as we sacrifice truth to expediency.
So: It would be hypocritical of “us” to attack Epstein because “we” ran child brothels.
Novel take
Who said sociopaths don’t stick together?
Countless posters across the web have claimed the NSDAP stopped all these Weimar child brothels. Did they know that, by Epstein island standards, the NS Germans RAN child brothels with 15-year-olds for their troops in WWII?
Yeah, Wiki pages never lie or exaggerate about German behavior during WWII…
I’m also sure Hitler would have loved Epstein and been totally a-okay with a bunch of Jewish elites pimping out teenage German girls to rich Germans and then blackmailing them. <end sarcasm>.
Don’t release that hypothetical evidence exonerating “the likes of Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Ehud Barak, Les Wexner, Noam Chomsky, Woody Allen, and other bigwigs.” They are enemies of the White race. They want us all dead. Better our enemies suffer, whether or not they are in fact guilty.
However, the fact is they are guilty. And the worst of the Epstein files have not been released. Pam Bondi tried to appease Congress with an incomplete release of 3 million heavily censored files. Not good enough. We demand all the files, unredacted (except for victim information), be released for the whole world to see. Otherwise, we are right to assume the worst.
The victims were all White girls. None were Jews. This was a typical Jewish pedophile ring, with a few non-Jewish collaborators to distract the masses. Focus on the Jews. That’s the key to this.
Today Trump ordered the release of all government files concerning “extraterrestrial life” and UFOs. I suspect a big diversion here. Trump and his friends want us to focus on space aliens, not on Jewish pedophile rings.
It won’t work. The Democrats now smell blood in the water. They seek to discredit Trump, and blame Epstein’s crimes on him. They forget that Epstein was a big donor to the Democratic Party.
I’ve seen for a long time that when things are really going catawampus, there are teasers in the MSM about aliens. There was even a meme about this from a few years ago mentioning the Epstein files. Life imitates art, right? I included it with this one:
Why Does Cthulhu Always Swim Left? Part 1 (counter-currents.com)
Extraterrestrials are illegal aliens, too!
There are at least three points on which the Epstein scandal has to be the truth.
First, this is a huge Jewish conspiracy — not a conspiracy theory but a conspiracy fact. Anyone who wants to deny that has to explain the innocent, non-conspiratorial means by which a sex-obsessed failed high school math teacher made himself a billionaire with access to the people that the international Jewish network of “elite” contacts gives you access to. Nobody can explain that, and it is rare to see anyone try. They prefer to avoid the topic of where Epstein’s money came from.
Second, “everybody knew.” The Epstein girls were out in the open, and people could see that they were too young. The people Epstein was contacting and corrupting have expensive security, that looks into the backgrounds of people that try to mingle with the very important people, and that decides who is part of “elite” circles and who is a dangerous and embarrassing nut that must be excluded. The dates on which Epstein (and later Maxwell) was repeatedly convicted of sex crimes mean that the security of the top people knew, as a matter of legal fact, that the Epstein cabal was about as bad as possible, and yet top people continued to associate with Epstein. That means that our “elite” political culture is utterly filthy. That can’t be untrue.
Third, there is a powerful and authentic popular reaction against this. We have a highly censored social media and mass media environment, but it can’t hide popular dislike for what Epstein did and stood for. If White people were not really offended, if we were hypocrites who were secretly on the same moral page with Jeffrey Epstein, the Epstein Files Transparency Act could not have passed, given the elite opposition to it.
So there was a genuine big-money conspiracy, it is damning for our pro-Jew and antiwhite “elites,” and there is a genuine popular reaction against it.
I have a small problem with echoing “the Truth about Epstein Doesn’t Matter” because I have great difficulty imagining that the truth about Epstein might be other than what it obviously is, that is a scandal of historical proportions.
That said, Greg Johnson is right. We should not be pouring any water on this fire.
Truth matters always. Lies and distortions will come back to haunt and curse you. No Q-tard, populist moral panic spreading nonsense about the Epstein files for clicks will save the nation, it will just accelerate brain rot on the right. And note Andrew wasn’t arrested for sex crimes, but for indiscretion with government documents.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.