Counter-Currents
Phil Eiger Newmann, Dancing for Dollars, 2020.
1,595 words
If white Americans kissed black America’s ass any harder, black America’s steatopygian ass would have a visible hickey — possibly even bleeding welts.
And yet the harder that white Americans try to appease blacks, blacks act less and less appeased.
While campaigning for the presidency in 2008, Barack Obama made a point of mentioning that he was black and that some people wouldn’t like the fact that he’s black. What he never acknowledged was that the only reason he was elected president in the first place was because he’s black.
Actually, Obama’s a mixed-breed mud-puppy born to a white mom and raised exclusively by whites, but he checked off “black” on the census form, which should tell you exactly how thankful he was to the only side of his family that didn’t abandon him.
In a recent podcast interview with two mentally handicapped black rappers — because, let’s face it, who’s more equipped to press a former president on matters of public policy than rappers are? — Obama repeated the provable lie that Republicans reach out to white people, when the fact is that Republicans are extremely careful never to mention white people by name:
What’s always interesting to me, is the degree to which we’ve created, you’ve seen created, in Republican politics, this sense that white males are victims. They’re the ones who are like under attack, which doesn’t jive [sic] with both history and data, and economics. . . . And the story that they’re hearing from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh and, in some cases, inside their churches, is that Democrats don’t believe in Christmas, only care about minorities and Black folks and are trying to take your stuff and trying to take your guns away. . . . The good news for me was I was very confident in what I had done for Black folks because I have the statistics to prove it.
Thanks for the hot take, Barack. What’s interesting to me about what you just said are two things:
- Donald Trump never once directly appealed to whites as a group. Not once. He did, however, reward black Americans with a $500-billion payout after they rioted all summer. He directly appealed to Hispanics with Spanish-language ads in Florida and by sponsoring a group called “Latinos for Trump.” But he spent both presidential campaigns and his entire administration acting as if white people don’t even exist.
- Almost immediately after dismissing the idea that Democrats “only care about minorities and black folks,” Obama bragged that statistics will prove that he cared about black folks.
As further anti-riot ransom money, the incoming Biden Administration is filling its economic posts “With Experts on Systemic Racism.” Since blacks have a historical record of impoverishing every place on the freakin’ planet that they plant their toes, what could possibly go wrong with such a plan?
Of course, it’s just like an extremely white person such as myself to ignore the fact that educational disparities based on systemic racism are the driving force behind that fact that all across the world, no matter who’s devising the intelligence tests, black people wind up on the shit end of the stick.
They never seem to consider the idea that maybe the problem isn’t education — it’s educability. And maybe the teachers aren’t awful, but a lot of the students are.
People who squirm to blame everyone besides black people for black people’s never-ending problems seemed to think everything would go fine and dandy once our nation’s schools were integrated and innate black scholarship could finally flap its gilded wings. Yet, a half-century after America’s public schools were integrated by force, they remain as segregated as ever. This is blamed on “white flight” and “white racism” rather than the basic notion that white people — at least modern ones, who are starkly different than their ancestors — tend to flee when black people start beating the shit out of them. So now you have the Black School Board President of New Orleans lamenting that “We have work still left to do,” which is what every shady activist says before holding out his hand and demanding more money.
At least white parents — the ones who aren’t willing to offer up their children as sacrificial lambs for the sake of diversity — are starting to notice that something’s rotten.
Former Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, who is so white that looking at her for more than a minute might render you snow-blind, recently vowed to remove her squeaky-white children from their New York City school after receiving a letter from a “public educator” named Nahliah Webber that contained the following passages:
There is a killer cop sitting in every school where white children learn. . . . They gleefully soak in their whitewashed history that downplays the holocaust of indigenous native peoples and Africans in the Americas. . . . They happily believe their all-white spaces exist as a matter of personal effort and willingly use violence against black bodies to keep those spaces white . . . white children are left unchecked and unbothered in their schools, homes, and communities to join, advance, and protect systems that take away black life. . . . I am tired of white people reveling in their state-sanctioned depravity, snuffing out black life with no consequences. . . . Where’s the urgency for school reform for white kids being indoctrinated in black death and protected from the consequences . . . ? Where are the national conferences, white papers, and policy positions on the pathology of whiteness in school . . . ? This time, if you really want to make a difference in black lives, and not have to protest this shit again, go reform white kids. Because that’s where the problem is — with white children being raised from infancy to violate black bodies with no remorse or accountability.
Sure, let’s forget about who is statistically “snuffing out black life.” But hey, “Nahliah” — where are the national conferences, white papers, and policy positions on black crime and black IQ?
San Francisco’s Lowell High School — a merit-based institution that relies on test scores and therefore features a student body that is 61% Asian — was recently instructed to abandon the racist test scores and instead admit students on a lottery-based system.
At a meeting between parents and administrators, a hilarious kerfuffle erupted between Asian parents and black parents that included the following golden nuggets:
Black Parent: “Black people can’t catch up technologically because the ‘stupid Asians’ are keeping black people down out of fear they’d be overtaken.”
Asian Parent #1: “Trust me, you’ll never catch up. If you need to lower standards to get in, you’ll never beat us.”
Asian Parent #2: “First you blame white people, now you blame us!? Grow up! Study harder or go home!”
Although my observations suggest that Asians are no friends to white people and tend to view them as intellectually inferior smelly albino apes, I admire these big-brained/low-T diminutive slants for standing up for their own children. Merely by dint of being Asian, they are wrecking the whole dumb narrative of black oppression. Boston school officials recently lamented that the racial demographics of their STEM schools are “too white and too Asian and they’re both meeting or exceeding expectations at higher rates” than blacks and Hispanics. New York City’s oil-drilling Mayor Bill de Blasio says he plans to remove race-blind admissions at two high-ranking NYC high schools, blaming “white supremacy” for the fact that, er, both schools were over 60% Asian.
With no advocates in the media, government, or academia, it shouldn’t surprise anyone that many whites are despondent. It’s been estimated that the current opioid crisis has taken nearly a half-million lives, most of them white, which is nearly as many white lives that perished in the Civil War. Many suspect that this is a deliberate program of pacification and annihilation. The Sackler family — whom many would see as white but who I doubt see many white people as Jewish — have been one of the primary drivers of this crisis by pushing OxyContin on the American public for nearly two decades now.
Despite the fact that the Sacklers, through their pill-pushing mega-corporation Purdue Pharma, pleaded guilty in 2007 to lying about OxyContin’s addictiveness, they forged ahead shamelessly as America’s preeminent smack dealers by maximizing profits through spraying the heartland with painkillers that kill people. Last Tuesday, Purdue Pharma pleaded guilty to three criminal charges.
Among their misdeeds:
- Offering kickbacks to doctors for writing OxyContin prescriptions.
- Offering rebates to pharmacies for each OD victim in an effort “to counter the emotional messages from mothers with teenagers that overdosed.”
- Arranging a meeting between Purdue board members and sales consultants “to discuss a. . . plan to ‘Turbocharge the Sales Engine’ for OxyContin.”
As part of a plea arrangement, the Sacklers agreed to pay $225 million to resolve civil liabilities — which is only about 2% of the total money they made through OxyContin sales.
In other news, opiate addict George Floyd is an honorary Holocaust victim and “Western Culture Originated With Rape and Murder,” so every last vestige of Greek and Roman antiquity needs to be erased.
Although this week was horrific, I have a nagging feeling that next week will be a drag, Pops, a king-size bust by comparison.
And no one hopes I’m wrong more than I do.
If you want to support Counter-Currents, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every weekend on DLive.
Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
43 comments
Racist fuck.
You apparently live under the delusion that the word “racist” means anything to anyone here.
For noticing?
Yeh, so? What’s your point?
This dude just said the same thing in response to Spencer quinns latest article about jew jokes.
Enough of this decorum…..tell us what you really think.
You mean Obama, right?
The proper term is not “racist” but “race realist”. But I understand that for some people (especially the less intelligent) reality hurts.
I see your king-size bust, daddy-o, and raise you The Rebel Set, starring Ed “Don’t call me chief” Platt.
https://youtu.be/bhNe2AOhOuM
As the trailer say, Man, like you mustn’t miss the Rebel Set!
“Actually, Obama’s a mixed-breed mud-puppy born to a white mom and raised exclusively by whites, but he checked off “black” on the census form, which should tell you exactly how thankful he was to the only side of his family that didn’t abandon him.”
Well, to be fair, he had to check off “black” to spare himself years of “Really? You’re the darkest white guy I ever met. And what’s with the hair? You should try to game the AA racket, man.”
Scathing descriptives, but I’m not going to argue with your point. I do this on the basis that you are pro-white, not a eugenics-inspired racist! That’s a fine line but you get the benefit of the doubt.
Racism is natural and normal, not a pathology to be warded against with devils horns. And eugenics has been practiced by humans for thousands of years; it’s only since 1945 it’s been deemed evil.
Totally agree with Mr. Goad that Asians are no friends to Whites, but they do at least stand up for their children. Not necessarily for their children’s individual happiness, but for their descendants’ economic and social success. Whites – particularly White women – would sell their White sons into literal slavery if it garnered them faceburg ‘likes’ and virtue-signaling status.
I plan to send Counter Currents another check for the pleasure of reading Mr. Goad – perhaps it will help counter the GoodWhite readers who are offended by his ‘tone,’ God rot their petty little souls.
Thanks for your kind words and your support. We have many dollars yet to raise before we reach out annual campaign goal. There’s information on how to help here: https://counter-currents.com/2020/11/the-counter-currents-2020-fundraiser-our-10000-matching-grant-livestreams-with-millennial-woes-endeavour/
Whites – particularly White women – would sell their White sons into literal slavery if it garnered them faceburg ‘likes’ and virtue-signaling status.
More baseless slander.
Oh dear. You HAVE to be joking. Just a quick scroll through that digital cesspit proves him right.
Oh dear. You HAVE to be joking. Just a quick scroll through that digital cesspit proves him right.
Right. Nevermind representative sampling and all that sciency stuff.
Let’s just go by “a quick scroll” online and completely ignore the dire consequences for women who so much as call the police on a black person, let alone show any racial solidarity with other Whites.
Good lord. You have it better than any humans in history thanks to white men and you’re STILL complaining. Would you really like to get into the science and statistics of white women’s treachery or are you just doing the shitlib knee jerk response of “sources!!”?
As far as dire consequences are concerned, well, sorry but this is what happens when “feel good” policies supported by a majority female electorate become manifest. Effect, meet cause.
Would you really like to get into the science and statistics of white women’s treachery…?
Yes, it’s long past time you prove your case or shut your mouth.
By the way, what were the overwhelmingly White male Republican Senators doing while you were scrolling through Facebook?
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/world/america/031220/us-senate-passes-bill-eliminating-per-country-cap-for-h-1b-work-visas.html
Selling out our children’s futures by unanimous consent. White men: race traitors for profit since 1619.
Ok. Women initiate divorce about 70% of the time and gain custody of any children 90% of the time. Your hypergamy has not only been unleashed but financially incentivized thanks to skewed alimony and child support laws. Look no further than the birth rates to see how that plays out.
Women use social media more than men and are more susceptible to social ostracization, hence their willingness to virtue signal.
Lol, you seem to be a bit slow so I’ll repeat this as many time as it takes; WOMEN ARE THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS.
Ok. Women initiate divorce about 70% of the time and gain custody of any children 90% of the time. Your hypergamy has not only been unleashed but financially incentivized thanks to skewed alimony and child support laws. Look no further than the birth rates to see how that plays out.
Weren’t we talking about women virtue-signalling and voting for “feel-good policies”? Having no evidence for this proposition, I see you want to change the subject to divorce. OK. Let’s talk about divorce. The fact that women initiate divorce 70% of the time is both unsurprising and irrelevant. It tells us nothing about who is actually at fault for divorce. We already know that men are more likely than women to commit crimes many times over. They are also more likely to be drunks, drug addicts, compulsive gamblers, and habitual cheaters. Why would you not expect women to file for divorce (and get custody) more often than men? Contra BLM and company, bad outcomes in court (or education, employment, etc.) are not proof of bias.
Now, the manosphere story is that women are getting divorced to “trade up” because we’re hypergamous. This claim is absurd on its face. Women are well aware that we’re not going to do any better in our early thirties than we did in our early twenties, now with children in tow. Indeed, men, not women, are more likely to remarry after divorce, putting the lie to your claim that divorce is so unfair to men that it’s discouraging marriage and depressing birthrates.
https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/11/14/chapter-2-the-demographics-of-remarriage/#:~:text=Among%20those%20eligible%20to%20remarry,compared%20with%2052%25%20of%20women.
The fact that I have to keep repeating these statistics over and over again is ridiculous. The burden is on you prove your claims about women. You’re not going to be able to do that in a comment thread. What is required is serious scholarship rather than armchair speculation.
more susceptible to social ostracization, hence their willingness to virtue signal.
Evidently we are not more susceptible to social ostracization. Otherwise, more men would be speaking out against White dispossession. Where are all the Kevin McDonalds? How many tenured White male academics are there in this country? Thousands at least. Yet, you can count on one hand (two at most) the number who have publicly objected to our dispossession, not even 1 in a 100. We have much, much bigger problems than powerless White women posting nonsense on FB.
Lol, you seem to be a bit slow so I’ll repeat this as many time as it takes; WOMEN ARE THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS.
White women aren’t the majority of voters, and I’ll repeat this as many times as it takes: It wouldn’t matter if the majority of the voters were woodchucks. Policymakers respond to their big donors. The voters have nothing to do with it.
Imagine claiming, in December 2020, that American elites scrupulously honor the will of the people and continue the ever-popular policy of nation-busting replacement-level mass immigration despite their better judgment. Seriously, I don’t know what to say to you if you’re that out of touch.
An incredibly compelling argument. You’re right. White women haven’t embraced feminism at all. Or destroyed the western family while shirking all responsibility and degraded themselves and their offspring daily for social media attention. My eyes have deceived me this whole time.
An incredibly compelling argument.
Thank you.
You’re right. White women haven’t embraced feminism at all.
Indeed. Organized feminism is a zombie movement that has no constituency among mainstream women, only it feeds on shekels rather than brains.
Or destroyed the western family while shirking all responsibility and degraded themselves and their offspring daily for social media attention. My eyes have deceived me this whole time.
No, you’re eyes are not decieving you; you’re just not looking at the whole picture. It’s a well-known phenomenon called confirmation bias. You believe the outrageous lies of Andrew Anglin and company, and then you see only the evidence that confirms that narrative. That’s why you need objective data.
With men, you generalize up. You judge all men by the heroes, inventors, and regular working stiffs, ignoring the criminals, traitors, and degenerates. With women, you generalize down, judging all of us by women who spend all day on Facebook and ignoring the far more numerous women who are dutiful wives and mothers who may or may not work outside the home caring for the sick, educating children, checking you out at the grocery store, and waiting on you in restaurants. Then, you conclude that men are superior in every way. Quelle surprise
They’re more willing to do it than mothers from other races.
For the same reason that hippie dippie education fads and tranny-ism are pretty much only endorsed by whites [or (((whites)))].
They’re more willing to do it than mothers from other races.
How would you know? There are no other groups who are subjected to demands for constant displays of racial masochism.
Of course, I wouldn’t necessarily be surprised if this were so. White men are a spectacularly hyperindividualistic group who have no problem whatsoever virtue signalling for personal gain. Why would anyone expect White women to be any different?
Not a single male Congressman voted against the censure of Steve King, not even Steve King himself! What else is there to say?
No doubt there are some, but I think the majority are quite NIMBY. As the great Joe Sobran said, in their mating and migratory patterns the average AWFL is indistinguishable from a member of the KKK. Or more succinctly: Talk like MLK, act like KKK. This has also been my observation. They always live in neighborhoods with “good schools.”
Educability, which as we might define as the ability to learn, is a correlate of intelligence, however. As indeed are working memory, retentiveness, receptiveness and so on.
We do not suggest that bonobos lack only the correct resources and positive image to become nuclear physicists: we know that would take a million years’ worth of genetic change.
To a far lesser degree the same is true of human populations. Either they take steps, through eugenics, to lose undesirable traits such as stupidity, or they will pay the price in schooling and beyond.
“They never seem to consider the idea that maybe the problem isn’t education — it’s educability. And maybe the teachers aren’t awful, but a lot of the students are.”
I’m convinced that they (the white appeasers) not only consider it, they know it to be the case. It is because of this, not in spite of it, that they persist in the ass kissing. A patronizing lie is easier to deal with than the truth.
Excellent article Jim!
Approximately 20 years ago, I attended a public university in a major American city. I took a full-time course load. I worked 3 part-time jobs and took out loans to finance my education. I basically lived in the library and slept 3-4 hours a night.
One day, a non-citizen visiting professor invited me to her office to discuss some comments I had made in class against her lengthy lecture of how Shakespeare’s Tempest was a monument to colonialist opperession and, how, in fact Shakespeare’s entire legacy was due only to the fact that the British had colonized the world.
She then handed me a photocopy of a backpack with a list of what we know today as microaggressions, and asked me if I had ever thought of “unpacking the knapsack of white privilege.”
I asked her what she was trying to recruit me for and she kicked me out of her office.
“…how Shakespeare’s Tempest was a monument to colonialist oppression and, how, in fact Shakespeare’s entire legacy was due only to the fact that the British had colonized the world…”
During Shakespeare’s life (1564-1616) the British had hardly discovered the world, let alone colonized it. The East Indian Coimpany was founded in 1600. That “professor” must have been illiterate.
I hear you but her and her ilk’s point is regarding Shakespeare’s subsequent dominance in the literary canon and the fact that he was, and sometimes still is, held up as the pinnacle of literary achievement in the Western world, which it is their stated goal to upend.
She was from India, thus the resentment towards British rule, although she was surely never alive at the time of Gandhi and all her rage was retroactive, so to speak. She also had plenty of time for trashing Mark Twain and Huckleberry Finn (see: Nigger Jim).
Still this all speaks to the fact that education is the very last thing all of this fancy rage is about.
Did I mention the fact that I was forced by the university diversity requirements to take this class, as well as one in Black “Literature” (hello, Henry Louis Gates)?
I’m proud to be a racist. It means I am in touch with reality.
In my gloriously diverse middle school growing up students had to pass a literacy “passport” test in order to attend high school. It amounted to reading a passage and writing down some thoughts about it. That was it. It was crazy how many black students failed. Equally astonishing was the amount of resources the school mobilized to get these students on track, with specialized test prep, afterschool and summer school programs, etc. Once it dawned on administrators how many black students were going to be stuck in 8th grade for the remainder of their lives, the test was abandoned. Literacy was no longer a prerequisite for attending high school. I recently read 52% of Philadelphians are functionally illiterate. I wonder why…
In any dysfunctional relationship, when “separation” is taken off the table, the totality of violent abuse exponentially increases. Collectively, with “separation” off the table mentally for most “whites,” the race has no bargaining chip.
And so when the average “white” normie thinks about “white supremacy,” such thought conjures up the evilness of “separation” in his mind.
So not only is the violent abuse within this dysfunctional “black/white” integrationist dystopia on the rise, but the bulk of “whites” are active participants in this racial masochistic ideology against any desire for Supremacy and the inherent SEPARATION which run parallel to the desire.
X years ago (maybe 5, maybe 12) I read an article about a/the )3w1sh woman who “discovered” Obama. I can’t find that article now. Basically, a J woman “just found” Obama. I’m sure there’s more to that, but you get the point. That point is well illustrated in the picture of this article: puppetry.
Some more sense would be brought into the world if that damned article could be found! It is somewhere.
“…The Sackler family — whom many would see as white but who I doubt see many white people as Jewish …”
Priceless! With this way of “naming the Jew” you can never be accused of “anti-Semitism”.
Them: “you racist.”
Me: “why, yes, I am. Thank you for noticing!”
Obama said the Democrats don’t only care about blacks and don’t want to take stuff away from whites (including their guns). I doubt that (homicide stats alone tell a different story, and Biden has said rifles have to go), but this is not contradictory with him saying how much he helped blacks (regardless whether or not that is true, which as I said, I have my doubts about).
It is of course possible to enact policies that end up helping whites and also end up helping blacks. A good president would be able to do that. Again, I don’t think that’s what Baracko did, but you didn’t say he was lying, you instead implied that the two things (not only caring about blacks vs. helping blacks) are incompatible. They’re not.
(Obama is also on shaky ground when he says stats say white males are not victims, as the life expectancy of American white males slightly decreased in recent years, unlike that of most other groups, though I don’t know how he defines victimhood. I don’t think either whites or blacks are victims as things currently are in the US)
It’s also not a lie that Trump and the Republicans reach out to whites. It’s possible to reach out to people, and even appeal to them, while actually despising them, which is what politicians of both parties and around the world do before brushing their capped teeth every morning. Do you think The Donald got 75 million votes, most of them from whites, without doing things that appealed to them?
It may be true he hasn’t mentioned whites by name (I’m not saying this is true, I won’t review all of Trump’s speeches and public utterances, I’ll just assume it is true), but that and Trump the Republicans don’t appeal to and reach out to whites (once more, even while loathing them in private)? Nonsense. Otherwise they’d barely get any votes.
Also Goad, based on what do you say that Obama was only elected president because he’s (half) black? Do you think that if he were white as Buttigieg or Biden, all else being equal, McCain would win in 2008? The election Obama won by nearly 10 million popular votes and almost 200 electoral college votes? Why? Do you have any evidence for that highly questionable little piece of counterfactual history?
Bush lost the popular vote against Gore and still did not win by that much against Kerry even though the economy still held together in 2004, and 12 years ago the Great Recession was going on. The Republicans would almost certainly not win in 2008 regardless of who the Democratic challenger was, and specially not with McCain as their candidate.
Failing to acknowledge whites by name amounts to reducing the power that they wield, indeed, it is intended to water down their identities by allowing members of other groups to appropriate those elements of white culture that they choose. The Republican party is able to acknowledge other groups in this way – that is, they also play identity politics – so not giving whites the same courtesy is providing different sets of political rules for different groups, and is an indictment of multiracial democracy.
There is no doubt that for a large portion of his voters, being black was a plus (regardless of whether the voter was black or White) and what possibly pulled the lever for him. But, it is true he had other things in his favor: Relative unknown (although what was known about him was not very helpful) and drawing the despicable McCain as an opponent (and equally despicable Romney in the next round).
As Henry Harpending and Steve Sailer have noted, ebonic jive like “Institutional Racism” and “Whiteness” should be dismissed as sub-Saharan superstitions. It’s like “bad juju.”
The last thing blacks need is for whites to indulge their childish beliefs.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment