The Kennedy Assassination & the Big LieGregory Hood
You killed John F. Kennedy. I killed John F. Kennedy. Like Jesus Christ, the king of Camelot died for our sins – the sins of racism, militarism, and hysterical anti-Communism. Of course, just as you are allowed to say that everyone killed Jesus except the people who actually killed him (the Jews), you are allowed to say that everyone killed Kennedy except the person who actually killed him (a Communist).
The anniversary of President Kennedy’s assassination is just another excuse to pathologize the American Right. In the popular imagination, President Kennedy was a liberal martyr in the “City of Hate,” 1960s Dallas. We have all seen the “Wanted for Treason” posters of Kennedy and the heard the dark tales of the hatred lurking in the heart of the Old South. Jesse Jackson is gloating that though Kennedy was struck down by “haters,” they didn’t win, and Jackson is free to cheat on his wife, visit his disgraced Congressman son in rehab, and pay for his lavish style with funds from the American taxpayer. The recent wave of news stories on the killing seem to suggest it was the Tea Party who carries the moral burden for murdering the President. The New York Times intones that a “changed Dallas” is “grappling” with its “ugly past” and the assassination, with the help of its shiny new lesbian, Latina sheriff.
What is often forgotten is that this narrative was popular at the time. Contra Oliver Stone, elite opinion even in 1963 blamed the “haters” in Dallas for striking down the President. In Rick Perlstein’s Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus, we learn that the emerging conservative movement was seriously wounded by the assassination, as many people blamed them for what had happened. Even mainline church leaders within Dallas took their first opportunity to speak from the pulpit to blame the city’s tolerance of “hate mongers and reactionaries” for the murder. The real murderer was “extremism.”
This continues today. Stephen King’s historical fiction book on the Kennedy assassination invents a group called the “Tea Party Society” that is spreading propaganda. Frank Rich, a New York Times columnist most famous for kvetching about Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ, solemnly warns that the rhetoric that opposed Kennedy is similar to that which is used against President Obama. He concludes, “The tragedy of the Kennedy cult is that even as it fades, the hothouse brand of American malice that stalked its hero stalks our country still.” Mass immigration, anti-white policies, and repression of free speech are all justified to undermine the white populism that murdered our President.
Of course, the person who actually did kill Kennedy was Lee Harvey Oswald. However, neither now nor at the time was there a call for soul-searching about Left-wing extremism. There was no pressure for young or idealistic Marxists to reexamine the logical conclusions of their ideas. Indeed, Kennedy’s murder arguably broke the technocratic, patriotic liberal consensus and paved the way for the forthrightly anti-American, Third World fetishizing New Left that would conquer American campuses (and culture) only a few years later. Being a Leftist means never having to say you are sorry.
This is just another example of the way contemporary America handles political violence. Widespread black violence against whites is either excused, ignored, or dismissed as being entirely without a racial dimension. Indeed, even as the headlines are dominated by stories about the “knockout game” of blacks attacking whites on the streets, newspapers are taking care to censor any mention of race, and even scolding readers for pointing it out. However, every white on black crime, even those completely invented such as in the infamous Duke Lacrosse Case, becomes a matter of Social Importance, with many learnéd pronouncements and furrowed brows among the Great and the Good.
A crime by a privileged white male is a hate crime, with its roots in a social system that institutionalizes racism and a culture steeped in hundreds of years of oppression that demands restitution against the entire privileged class. A crime against a white male is, well, “random.”
Similarly, political assassinations, attempted political assassinations, or large-scale terrorist killings are judged on their political usefulness. The obviously insane Jared Loughner was reinvented by the media into a Tea Party libertarian when he shot Gabrielle Giffords. They even tried to link him to American Renaissance. James Holmes of the “Batman” shootings was initially reported as a member of a Tea Party group. The problem was, it was a different James Holmes. When a census taker was found murdered, the media rejoiced that Right-wingers straight out of Deliverance were murdering “feds” in the woods. It turns out it was suicide. In contrast, when Left-winger Christopher Dorner went on a killing spree, his political views were either concealed or forthrightly celebrated.
Conspiracy theories are also handled differently. Questioning the holocaust, or even the numbers behind the holocaust, is a serious crime in many Western democracies. Questioning 9/11 is allowed – unless one brings in Israel, in which case it becomes a serious faux pas. Questioning the Oklahoma City bombing also makes you a nut. Whatever one thinks of the evidence supporting these theories, the hysterical reaction is worthy of attention in and of itself.
However, blaming right wingers for the murder of President Kennedy is not only allowed, but celebrated. You get to make a widely promoted movie with a top rate cast. You can even blame the assassination on people like General Edwin Walker, who Oswald also tried to kill. Even those who consider themselves outsiders need to believe someone other than a Leftist killed Kennedy – to the point of saying the Federal Reserve was behind it.
Ultimately, we create meaning in our society through Narrative and Myth. Violence is meaningless unless it can be understood in some greater context. As Good and Evil are no longer permissible explanations, and God is dead, we are left with politics. In the political sphere, it is always and forever The Man – the evil Right-wing white man, the cancer of human history, the eternal Nazi – who is responsible for all that has gone wrong in the world.
And so it doesn’t matter who killed Kennedy in the real world. In the mythic context, you – you who read this website – killed him, and unless you atone, you will be judged. The Secular Theocracy of Multiculturalism in the post-Christian West offers redemption – but only if you repent and renounce that white privilege of yours.
In the Oliver Stone movie JFK, Kevin Costner’s Jim Garrison recites the old line that Hitler said the bigger the lie the more people would believe it. Well, JFK himself admired Hitler, so in his memory let’s clear that up. Hitler was not referring to himself when he said that line – he was referring to what he referred to as the Jewish sabotage of the German war effort during World War I. The other source was Goebbels – who was referring to the English. The way liberals use the story of the “Big Lie” is itself a “Big Lie.”
So is the Kennedy assassination. The accepted story is that Oswald, a Communist, killed JFK, and the more evidence we find out, the more likely that’s actually what happened. Yet the same people who tells us this continue to tell us Dallas – and white America – bear responsibility for the murder of the American President. Well, they can’t have it both ways.
The Left killed Kennedy. They continue to enable violence against whites every day. They are the ones who are creating a culture of hate against our people with their never-ending propaganda in magazines, movies, and media.
And they are, after all, the undisputed Old Masters of the Big Lie.
Will Woke Capital Soon Go the Way of the Dinosaur?
Liberal Anti-Democracy, Chapter 5, Part 2: Democracy Against the People
Right vs. Left: What Does It All Mean?
An Open Letter to Tucker Carlson
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 533 Ask Me Anything
The War Against White Children, Part 1
The Latest Emmett Till Narrative
Patrick Bateman: “Literally Me” or a Warning?
Very well done. I never really thought about how the JFK assassination is being used to attack the right and excuse the “left.” There is one book that blames Israel, and mentions the possible US opposition to the Dimona nuclear power plant, which was really a cover for a nuclear weapons program by our 51st state. The idea being that Israel had to take Kennedy out so the Kosher crew could begin its arms race in the Middle East. Not to sure about that theory myself, but I don’t expect it to get much air time.
Of the theories
that Oswald had the backing of an organization that I’ve heard the most probable is that it was Israel. Killing a sitting U.S. president is one heck of a risk for any group to take.
Suspects put forward have been:
(1) The Mafia
(4) Texas oil men
To take such a risk the motive has to be equivalent to the risk.
In the case of the Mob it was to have been a way of getting rid of Bobby Kennedy as attorney general who was on a Mob witch hunt. The maximum motive here would be socres of millions of dollars of anual reven lost due to curtailment of Mob activity.
For Castro it would have been personal revenge and/or prevention of yet another CIA attempt on his life.
For Israel, if it was about gaining weapons garde material from the U.S. to build Israels bombs, then it was on a higher level of magnitude. Gaining several bombs would have been a way for Israel to counter the exitential threat of it’s neighbors.
So clearly the motive for Israel was much greater than anyone else.
Kennedy may have eventually had Castro assasinated, but that would be only the death of one man and Cuba would likely have remained communist.
Then there was the fact that “The assassin who kills the assassin” was a Jew, Jack Ruby.
And of course, as we all know from Victor Ostrovsky and from our life experiences, the sayanim, in practially every center of power in the U.S., had much greater power to orchestrate a cover up than Cuba or the Mob combined.
Then there is the history of MOSSAD assinating foreigners, including I belive the liber U.K. politician Robin Cook, and there history of trying to kill Americans in the Egyptian Pincus affair and of actually killing American sailors in the Liberty incident a few years after Kennedy was killed.
Then there is the cover up of the USS Liberity indicent by Johnson.
All in all if there was an organization behind Oswald, and particualarly if he wasn’t the only shooter, then hands down the odds are it was Israel, quite possibly with the cooperation of Johnson.
Gregory Hood says it just the way we all need to hear it.
I always get a dark vision into the future when I read his posts: Soon we will see “White privilege” coupled with KKK and Nazi, most prominently on MSNBC. Then “White” will come to mean KKKlux Neo-Nazis, and vice versa.
Whiteness will not be allowed, unless it’s apologizing, groveling, and “doing more,” ie losing more, and paying more for the privilege of dispossession.
Yes. White Nationalism is not at all about conspiracy theories. J-ws are behaving the way the do because of an evolutionary group strategy, which they do plainly in front of our eyes, not because of some obscure conspiracy here and there. J-ws support Israel – it’s in the open. J-ws support mass immigration, have always lobbied for that – it’s in the open. J-ws support every little symptom of rotting in white society – it’s in the open. They don’t do it in an obscure way. They do have some conspiracies (like the conspiracy by several J-ws including Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, etc.), but it’s essentially not a conspiracy in the ordinary meaning of the world.
WNism and opposition to J-wish power is all about plausible and economical theories about reality, not about some lunatic conspiracy theory.
I agree with this, that doesn’t change the fact that the JFK killing was a conspiracy. Photo evidence of the “umbrella man” and testimony by E. Howard Hunt prove this. I’m not a conspiracy theory enthusiast but neither should we promote moronic official narratives. The professional “debunkers” are 9 times out of 10 leftist, neocon or Jewish. We don’t need to do their job for them.
Yes, indeed. I find it odd that so many folks of my acquaintance, even those chronically mistrusful of govenments, are so quick to gobble up the version of…the government. Not that most of the other theories necessarily make a whole lot of sense, but why would anyone describe the Warren Commission Report as anything other than a theory, also.
This is an excellent, hard-hitting, concise piece. I always enjoy new work by Gregory Hood.
Very interesting article. I thought everything odd and inexplicable about the Kennedy assassination had been said, and had been aware of how greatly the left benefited from his martyrdom, but was not aware that it had been used to demonize the right. And the most concrete of the various odd facts is the killing of Oswald by Jack Rubie. If Oswald did it as a Communist agent, it would make perfect sense to pay the Mafia to silence him before a trial could show that the assassination was in fact carried out by a Communist. That would have been a propaganda disaster.
The very term “conspiracy theory” was invented by the CIA to discredit doubters of the Warren Report. In any case I don’t believe that Oswald did it, or at least not he himself alone and not by his own initiative.
Sounds as if you may have read the book by James Douglass, “JFK and the Unspeakable”. Socalled “conspiracy theorists” have relabelled themselves “assassination researchers” and that is a good thing in my eyes. It’s a more proper description of their aims.
A different viewpoint: http://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2013/11/21/jekyll-island-the-jfk-assassination-and-911-three-american-coups/
Well, since no one else stepped up to the plate, I guess its up to me to start the ball rolling on the JFK conspiracy theory. There isn’t a lot of definitive evidence to work with, so its mostly conjecture. However, I think that an informed and intelligent analysis of the evidence suggests a strong case for more than just a single player involved. The Jack Ruby element, a mob-connected Jewish nightclub owner eliminating the assassin before he has the chance to be interrogated, is highly suspicious. I think a more likely hypothesis is that there was a Judaic element involved, a group that at this period had deep connections and lofty positions of influence within U.S. government, U.S. organized crime, Israeli intelligence and Soviet officialdom (Meier Lansky, the powerful mob boss as a potential key player). The most convincing motive is that important players within Judaism, who were fiercely committed to the survival of Israel, sought nuclear weapons for their ethnostate, a project that was opposed by the JFK administration, which was pressuring organized crime as well. A likely candidate (possibly multiple) with the virtues of decent marksmanship skills, confused politics, a sense of mission and susceptibility to influence was/were found and indoctrinated/trained. A plan was developed and the project successfully carried out, although unluckily the assassin was caught by a fluke. This necessitated pressuring/influencing one of the U.S. Sayanim to make a sacrifice for the good of his people: Jack Ruby, a man who cared deeply about the fate of Israel. While again, this is conjecture, the string of coincidences and suspicious activities, in my mind, make this a more likely scenario than the “official” explanation. Certainly the confluence of powerful Judaic players within organized crime, Israeli intelligence and so forth have successfully carried out numerous intricately planned operations successfully before and since. That such an operation conducted on 9/11 is another intriguing possibility, where no definitive evidence exists, but a strange number of coincidences suggests that the official explanation is insufficient.
In any case, I appreciate Mr. Hood’s writing, insightful as always.
Kennedy got the back of his head blown out after refusing to play ball with America’s quasi-independent CIA/MIC/DeepState. No wonder no president has tried since.
I disagree about the more we find out the more it’s likely to be Oswald,etc. There are a few new books out with much more information and most implicates Johnson as the center of the evil. He was connected to every agency that Kennedy was in conflict with. As Oswald said, “Im just a patsy and I think he was. The funny thing is, the left would still have been responsible for Kennedys death, if Johnson was the main pivot point of it all.
As someone pointed out in Stormfront, between 1962 and 1964, there were atypical changes of leadership in France, Germany (both East and West), UK, Italy, USA, USSR, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria, India and the Vatican, amongst others:
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment