Counter-Currents 2024 Fundraiser
A Place of Our Own
Spencer J. Quinn
White people need a voice. The white diaspora in North America, to be specific, needs a voice. Frankly, all people who wish to maintain themselves indefinitely into the future need a voice—a powerful, dynamic, identifiable voice. When a people has territory, with enforceable borders as well as a common language, religion, history, and folklore, then maintaining that voice becomes easy. The white peoples in many parts of Europe have enjoyed such distinctions for centuries. Same with white diasporas as they were formed in North America, southern Africa, and Australia. Whites carved out ethnically homogeneous territories for themselves upon which they could prosper. There really is no other way.
Since those days—which perhaps reached their zenith shortly before the First World War—whites have been gradually losing territory, first through decolonization and later through non-white immigration into traditionally white homelands. This all happened slowly enough not to jarringly impact their material prosperity. This, mixed with a generosity of spirit which many whites possess—perhaps as a result of two millennia of Christianity—has allowed this trickle of immigration to gradually increase throughout the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. But with the immigration crisis of the past fifteen years in Europe and with the Biden-Harris administration effectively opening America’s southern border since 2021, it has become increasingly clear over a very short period of time that whites are losing the territory they once owned—and with it, their voice.
It has gotten to the point that, in many places, even to speak with a voice representing the interests of a unified white population is taboo or even criminal. Whites who do so often face swift punishment, such as social ostracization, character assassination, career loss, and worse . So, as long as material prosperity can be maintained, whites typically abstain from talk that even hints of white ethnocentrism. It’s just safer that way. The price we pay for this safety, however, is to sacrifice our future as a people. With fewer and fewer whites speaking out as whites, the stronger the anti-white forces everywhere become. As this continues, more and more non-whites will flood into white spaces until there is none left. This is the vicious cycle we are all in danger of drowning in, and it can only result ultimately in extinction.
Well, this has to end. For their very survival, whites must regain their voice, which they can then use to regain territory—a place of their own, so to speak. And the only way to do this is for whites to start speaking out loud as whites. For example, beginning sentences by saying, “Well, as a white person, I feel . . .” or “Well, when you consider what’s best for whites . . .” or “Well, it’s unfair to characterize whites as . . .” This is actually beginning to happen in the highest levels of our government, with both President Donald Trump and Vice Presidential candidate JD Vance recently speaking out, however obliquely, for white interests.
Essentially, this amounts to claiming for whites the same rights that virtually all other peoples claim for themselves across the globe. Reasonable, right? Given our cultural climate of anti-white hatred, however, this becomes a daunting task. Thus, regaining our voice should begin at home, then with friends and neighbors, and ultimately in public. These are the first steps, after which whites can organize to claim places of their own. Once again, there is no other way.
Of course, this will entail great risk, which is why most whites will not be in a position to speak out right away or with the same level of commitment. Fortunately, institutions do exist which provide a platform for pro-white voices where anything can be discussed—politics, religion, science, current events, literature, art, music, history, philosophy, and so on. There are several excellent ones. Counter-Currents, however, must be counted front and center among these because it does not shy away from what I see as the three cornerstones of White Nationalism: White identity, race realism, and the Jewish Question.
Whites cannot have a powerful, dynamic, and identifiable voice in today’s culture without being versed in these three elemental topics. And this, frankly, is Counter-Currents’ bread and butter. The point here is to grow our movement so that more and more whites can afford the risk of speaking out on behalf of their people. Such whites will have a ready-made community waiting for them once they make the plunge. This is how we ultimately reclaim places of our own, which are necessary for our survival. Again, there is no other way.
And the only way to achieve such goals tomorrow is to give to give to institutions like Counter-Currents today.
There are many ways to donate, but the easiest is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.
You can explore all your donation options on our Donate page.
Counter-Currents%202024%20Fundraiser%0AA%20Place%20of%20Our%20Own%0A
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
John Doyle Klier’s Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881-1882, Part 3
-
Concentrating White Identity at the Point of Impact
-
Prove Them Right
-
Editor’s Update
-
John Doyle Klier’s Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881-1882, Part 2
-
John Doyle Klier’s Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881-1882, Part 1
-
Critical Daze
-
Editor’s Update
5 comments
Very well written. I’ll send Counter-currents some money before the end of the year.
As a New Zealander who has contributed to CC, I find it irritating when we go unmentioned “Same with white diasporas as they were formed in North America, southern Africa, and Australia.” – You could say Australasia or the Antipodes or just add New Zealand to the sentence.
Although it looks small, it is larger than a lot of countries in Europe with enormous resource potential. And some of the best red meat in the world 😉
Noted. Thank you.
Does NZ belong now to the Chinese just like Australia does, or is the situation in NZ better?
As an Australian who has, presumably inadvertently, had his nom de plume appropriated by a New Zealander, I appreciate my Kiwi cousin’s plea for recognition but would ask him to choose another moniker for himself.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.