The Union Jackal
September 2024

2,441 words

Huw Edwards, former BBC news presenter and a convicted paedophile. Image courtesy of Crown Prosecution Service

Hello, and welcome to Celebrity Paedophiles!

The phrase “two-tier policing”, coined by then-Tory Home Secretary Suella Braverman in 2023, has widened out in semantic scope to become, first, the “two-tier justice system”, and now, the “two-tier society”. This means, when it comes to equality before the law, different strokes for different folks. In this Brave(rman) New World, there is a protected game reserve populated by those known as “celebrities”, creatures with special status who are treated by the judicial system in a wholly different manner to the plebeians, particularly the white ones. To be a “celebrity” grants a protected characteristic in the same way as being a Muslim or a transvestite or some other whack-job or pervert is.

The BBC is embroiled in yet another paedophilia scandal, this time involving a veteran and “well-respected” newsreader, the Welshman Huw Edwards. Edwards was convicted of receiving 377 images of underage children engaged in sexual activity, some as young as seven. Even just researching this for sources made me feel like I needed a bleach shower. The question of whether those who seek gratification via the sexual abuse of children are mad or bad is wholly irrelevant. The question of whether or not they should be incarcerated is not irrelevant. At least, it shouldn’t be. If you interfere with children, off to the big house you must go, where they have their own moral code which applies to your sort. I’m not going to virtue-signal about paedophilia. If someone does not think it wrong, I just don’t know what to say about that.

Following on from the post-riot judicial pogroms which saw lengthy jail sentences handed down for comments made online, Edwards avoided jail and was given a suspended sentence for viewing pictures of children below teenage years having sex together. He was ordered to attend a “sex offender treatment scheme”. Okay, I am going to virtue-signal a bit. Wouldn’t a couple of petrol bombs lobbed into the room where those meetings are held improve the lives of children everywhere? Edwards’ defence was the usual motley of familiar excuses, including mental health problems, low self-esteem, and alcoholism, which is treated, as it always is in these cases, as an affliction and not a matter of personal agency. In Britain, people of protected status “have” alcoholism the same way people have cancer or Multiple Sclerosis, not because they are inveterate piss-heads with no self-control.

Edwards is not some sad, single, middle-aged man drowning alone in his vile obsessions. He is a famous media figure and the father of five children, all of whose lives will now be just that bit worse for his need to look at children having sex. The Edwards clan will spend private time thinking about what it was that their father was thinking about when he changed their nappies and bathed them all those years ago. Paedophilia has a range of effects which extend beyond the children exploited.

Perhaps the judge was squeamish about Edwards’ likely fate in jail. There, paedophiles – known as “nonces” – are not given a hospitable welcome by their colleagues in crime, and are often killed or maimed by other inmates expressing their own moral code, such as it is. Some may say this is the judicial system working, for once, rather efficiently. This is more than can be said of the case of The Crown vs. Huw Edwards.

Irish job creation (Irish need not apply)

To the Emerald Isle to check that Irish eyes are still smiling. On second thoughts, let’s not bother. Paddy does not look best pleased with government immigration policy, and he’d better not set eyes on the Employment Permits Act 2024, or it will take more than Guinness to placate him. Not only are the Irish government refusing to reverse their ruinous path on immigration, they are – and I know the Irish enjoy a pun – Dublin down.

This Act expands the remit of existing legislation covering foreign nationals who wish to enter Ireland legally and work there. Passing over the fact that this tacitly admits that those not covered by the existing legislation obviously wish to enter the country illegally and claim benefits rather than be put through the inconvenience of finding a job, the legislation does everything it can to make it easier for immigrants to use the employment system to their benefit rather than that of the Irish people. The Act will now include sub-contractors, for example, and allow immigrants to change employer after nine months rather than the previous term of a year. If it wasn’t already easy enough to get into Ireland and take unskilled jobs away from the locals (in a country which already has a 4.3% rate of unemployment), the Irish government just made it easier.

On the plus side, there is an election looming for an unpopular government, and electioneering by weak and vulnerable parties in power always involves concessions to what people actually want – and don’t want. The notorious Irish “Hate Speech Act”, known properly as the Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022 looks likely to be scrapped before the Irish next go to the polls. It’s a pound to a pinch of snuff that if the incoming government is the same as that at present, it will immediately try to reinstate it, but that depends on the Irish electorate putting them back in the Oireachtas. This may sound like some digestive medical condition, but is in fact what the Micks call their parliament. Their freedom of speech is in their hands.

The problem of definition had actually, finally, been addressed in a proposed amendment to the Bill. This “problem of definition”, in governmental terms, means that people have started to notice clauses such as “hatred means hatred”. This open-ended, meaningless, “x = x” non-definition is a prime example of what I have called “usable ambiguity”. That is, the making of the definition of an offence so vague that it can be adapted to fit whatever misdemeanour you want it to fit. The proposed amendment to this deliberately wooly thinking, prior to the scrapping of the Bill altogether, was that hatred be taken as meaning “a state of mind characterised as intense and irrational emotions of opprobrium, enmity, and detestation rooted in bias, prejudice or hostility”. So, the average Irish rugby supporter watching a game against England, then. The last straw may have been the government’s intention to add “illegal immigrant” status to the already long list of “protected characteristics”. Immigration is a touchy subject in Ireland just at the moment, and you would be unwise to mention it should you visit Eire. In fact, you would probably be more popular if you walked into a pub dressed as Oliver Cromwell.

Lammy out of here

Positive affirmation rarely ends well, and when it involves an ethnic placeman at the highest levels of government, the consequences can prove serious. David Lammy is the latest British Foreign Secretary, and as black as your hat. His first two months on the world stage are an opening night everyone would rather forget. It is an open secret that Keir Starmer did not want Lammy in this most vital of roles, but the optics demanded a black face in a post that has been held by whites of the caliber of Harold MacMillan, Ramsay MacDonald, and the Earl of Balfour.

Lammy has been the butt of jokes since his calamitous appearance on BBC quiz show Mastermind. Among Lammy’s triumphs were the belief that the “Marie” who won a Nobel Prize for physics in 1903 for her work in discovering radium was Marie Antoinette, and that the English king who succeeded Henry VIII was Henry VII. And now this dolt has achieved high office, he is not doing much better on the world stage than he did under the lights of the BBC studio. The British Foreign Secretary needs to combine diplomacy with an astute understanding of world events, and Lammy clearly has a grasp of neither. And, given that he is in post purely as an exercise in black tokenism, it might be expected that he wear an ordinary pair of shoes to work along with his suit, rather than what look like scuffed child’s training-shoes.

Apart from his recent claim that climate change represents a greater threat to mankind than nuclear war, Lammy has pissed off Netanyahu to the extent that the head Jew wouldn’t even see him, and he has already torpedoed relations with Donald Trump, calling him a “neo-Nazi” and a “tyrant in a toupé”. Nice work, black boy. Lammy’s latest howling error was to weigh in on the long-standing dispute over the region of Nagorno-Karabakh, which lies between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Lammy referred to the ethnic cleansing of some 120,000 Armenian Christians as “liberation” on behalf of the Azerbaijanis, prompting fierce buzzing in the diplomatic hive.

Lammy had already marked his card in the event of a Trump victory in November. In 2018, he protested Trump’s visit to the UK because “I am a lawmaker”. He and Kamala Harris were both lawyers, a regular profession for the political class of both countries, which doesn’t say a great deal for the entry requirements in either country. But Lammy is desperately trying to backtrack now that there is every chance Trump will become the 47th President of the USA, and he magnanimously said that “we will work with whoever the United States choose to put in the White House”. Yes, but will the United States want to work with a chippy, ignorant black man? If and when Trump does win, I would love to see him treat his friend Nigel Farage as the de facto British Ambassador. This would both cement a Right-wing alliance between two important members of the famed “special relationship”, and make Lammy look even more pointless than he does already.

God knows there is plenty to be irritated and annoyed about in the UK under this government, but there is also much to be genuinely angry about. For example, how did a system built by white Englishmen decay to such a putrefied stage that thick race-baiters such as Lammy are not only not working as a team-manager in a supermarket at best, but now represent this once-great country at the international level? Here is Lammy on the election of a new Pope, after the customary release of either white or black smoke in Vatican City on the election – or otherwise – of a new Pontiff. The BBC had reported that such a visual announcement was about to be made. Lammy puts his big, black foot firmly in his mouth:

“This Tweet from the BBC is crass and unnecessary. Do we really need silly innuendo about the race of the next Pope?”

No, it’s okay, there is no need to read that again. You read it right first time around. Lammy believes that the smoke indicates whether the new head of the world’s Catholic Church is lily-white or a schwarze.

Where will it end? How long will powerful whites allow idiotic coloured children to eat at the grown-ups’ table? Lammy? Lemmy would have done a better job.

All together, class: “We hate whitey!”

The installation of the Labour Party as the party of government has ushered in a new age in British politics, as it is the country’s first explicitly anti-white government. This is so obviously true that even the MSM are starting to notice. The Daily Telegraph used to be the Tory Party’s newspaper of record until it took the candy bar and joined the rest of the bland, simpering toadies of the press, but it recently made the staggering discovery that “anti-racist” is code for “anti-white”. Every group targeted by Labour is predominantly white, and that is the main reason for its being targeted. The pub-goer is one of the latest to have their lifestyle harassed, with Labour mooting plans to shorten opening hours, knowing perfectly well that this will target mostly white people. One of the great joys of pubs in England is that blacks and Muslims don’t tend to use them.

Elsewhere in the white demographic, winter heating subsidy payments to Britain’s pensioners are being cut, which will inevitably lead to the deaths of predominantly elderly white people. This will cut £1.5 billion from an already absurdly stretched budgetary deficit, while illegal immigrants cost the country around £7 billion per annum. What, did you think we wouldn’t notice? Too many white citizen journalists around for that, my son, which is why the government will go after them next.

The anti-white Left have not only finished their long march through the British institutions, they’ve showered, changed into their Mao suits, and are enjoying a smoothie in the canteen. The Church of England, for example, which used to be referred to as “the Tory Party at prayer”, has long been a pom-pom girl for mass immigration, Islam, and the whole carnival of neuroses which is “woke”. Their latest gesture indicating how much the Lord’s representatives on earth despise His finest achievement (that would be the white man) is the creation of a “head of racial justice priority” on double the average salary of a vicar. I don’t recall such a Biblical imperative, but perhaps I skipped through The Book of Race Grifters, and missed something. The Right Honourable Reverend Anderson Jeremiah may have a name like a preacher in a Cormac McCarthy novel, but he wouldn’t have lasted long there, stating that:

“We are at a pivotal moment to commit our resources into tangible action, prayerfully enabling the Church to become more racially just”.

Blow it out your arse, you God-bothering simpleton.

Education, meanwhile, is a redoubt long since taken by the anti-white activists currently posing as members of the teaching profession. Here’s a preçis of the latest throttling of white education, again from the Telegraph:

“Teachers will be taught to challenge ‘whiteness’ in lessons… Teachers will be instructed in how to ‘disrupt the centrality of whiteness’ in schools, according to a best-practice document… [G]uidance suggests that concepts including ‘meritocracy’, ‘objectivity’, and ‘individualism’ should be questioned… This process may involve more references to ‘colonialism’ and ‘racism’ in lessons, and instilling an understanding of the ‘impact of whiteness.’”

There’s plenty more where that came from to ensure a new generation of ethnically castrated white kids vote people like David Lammy into positions of power. “The impact of whiteness”. You have to love that one. You mean, like, history and civilization and science and art and literature and philosophy and shit like that? When exactly are whites going to fight back in the UK? It won’t start in the classroom.

White power. Vote it in, keep it in.

The Union Jackal.