Counter-Currents
With Audio Version
Let’s Hope That Everyone Who Kills Our Children Is White
Jim Goad
Hermanio Joseph, a Haitian migrant convicted of vehicular homicide in the 2023 death of 11-year-old Aiden Clark in Springfield, OH (Clark County Sheriff’s Office)
1,209 words
“I wish that my son, Aiden Clark, was killed by a 60-year-old white man.”
Those rancid words slithered out of Nathan Clark’s lips last Tuesday evening as he spoke at a City Commission Meeting in Springfield, OH. The stubby-looking father of a recently deceased son expressed this foul sentiment barely an hour before Donald Trump put Springfield on the map with his debate comments about Haitian migrants “eating the pets of people that live there.”
While the nation has been engulfed in controversy for more than a week about whether wild-eyed and purple-gummed migrants are chowing down on people’s pets in Springfield, OH, this ghastly statement by a white Springfield resident whose 11-year-old son was killed by an unlicensed Haitian driver has escaped notice.
Audio version: To listen in a player, use the one below or click here. To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save link/target as.”
Backstory: On August 22, 2023, a 35-year-old Haitian named Hermanio Joseph—later claiming that he lost control of his minivan when the morning sun blinded him—careened over the center line on a road in Springfield, Ohio. Joseph’s van collided with a bus that was transporting 52 students to class on the first day of school. The bus overturned, ejecting and killing Aiden Clark. At least 23 other students were injured. When Ohio Highway Patrol officers asked Joseph for ID at the crime scene, he produced a Mexican driver’s license.
That highway divider wasn’t the first line Hermanio Joseph had crossed illegally. In August of 2022, he snuck across the border from Mexico to the US. Federal authorities captured him, but then magically released him. He appears to be one of 300,000—yup, THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND—Haitians the Biden administration granted Temporary Protected Status to help shelter these sweet black butterflies from being caught in a federal dragnet and cruelly returned to the flaming cesspit whence they fled.
Back in May when Joseph was sentenced to a minimum of nine years in prison for vehicular homicide, Aiden Clark’s father told the courtroom he didn’t want his son’s death to be exploited by the racist creeps who traffic in “hate”:
Because of Mr. Joseph, our hearts will always be incomplete…. In capital letters and bold print, we do not want our son’s name to be associated with hate that’s being spewed by the uninformed majority that vocalized their hate.
Last Tuesday, Clark uttered the word “hate” six more times during his three-minute ethnomasochistic spiel in Springfield:
You know, I wish that my son, Aiden Clark, was killed by a 60-year-old white man. I bet you never thought anyone would ever say something so blunt.
Well, “blunt” is one way to put it. “Appalling” is another. So is “sickening.” But why does the white man have to be 60? It only proves that boomers are America’s most persecuted minority.
But if that [60-year-old white] guy killed my 11-year-old son, the incessant group of hate-spewing people would leave us alone. The last thing that we need is to have the worst day of our lives violently and constantly shoved in our faces. …
I’d imagine your son’s death was far more violent than anything being said about it. Then again, I ain’t the Haitian driver who killed him.
They make it seem as though our wonderful Aiden appreciates your hate. That we should follow their hate…. Using Aiden as a political tool is, to say the least, reprehensible for any political purpose. And speaking of morally bankrupt, politicians Bernie Moreno, Chip Roy, J. D. Vance, and Donald Trump, they have spoken my son’s name and used his death for political gain.
At the risk of sounding rude, I hadn’t heard of your son until you used him as a political tool.
They can vomit all the hate they want about illegal immigrants, the border crisis, and even untrue claims about fluffy pets being ravaged and eaten by community members. However, they are not allowed, nor have they ever been allowed, to mention Aiden Clark from Springfield, Ohio. …
They don’t need your permission to mention him.
To clear the air, my son Aiden Clark was not murdered. He was accidentally killed by an immigrant from Haiti…. But don’t spin this towards hate. In order to live like Aiden, you need to accept everyone. Choose to shine, make the difference, lead the way, and be the inspiration.
“Choose to shine?” A shine killed your son, and apart from a handful of politicians, Americans had zero choice in letting him into the country.
Did you know that [Aiden] researched different cultures to better appreciate and understand people that he interacted with? Did you know that one of the worst feelings in the world is to not be able to protect your child? Even worse, we can’t even protect his memory when he’s gone. Please stop the hate.
It’s too late to protect your son, but if either one of you had “researched” Haitian culture, you might have taken protective measures. And if government officials had stopped the massive influx of Haitians, you wouldn’t need to “stop the hate.”
Nathan Clark isn’t the first white parent to use his child’s corpse like a soapbox to stand on and rail against “hate.”
In 2022, moments after two black teens shot and killed a white high-school football star named Elijah Dewitt in a Georgia parking lot, Dewitt’s girlfriend and both of his parents said they forgave the killers. Dewitt’s dad Craig told reporters:
Forgiveness is for the forgiver. We don’t want the hate in this household.
In 2018, after an illegal immigrant from Mexico abducted and stabbed 20-year-old Mollie Tibbetts to death in Iowa, her father Rob attacked Donald Trump for mentioning the situation, calling him “heartless” and “despicable.” Rob Tibbetts also had harsh words for people who “appropriate Mollie’s soul in advancing views she believed were profoundly racist.” He spoke much more glowingly of Mexicans:
The Hispanic community are Iowans. They have the same values as Iowans. As far as I’m concerned, they’re Iowans with better food.
Still, his daughter will never be able to eat another taco.
Amy Biehl was a white Stanford graduate who flew to South Africa on a quixotic mission to assist the natives in their battle against apartheid. In August 1993, a mob of blacks dragged her out of her car, stabbing and stoning her to death while chanting anti-white slurs. Three of her murderers reportedly “burst out laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court…when a witness told how the battered woman groaned in pain.”
In 1998, when all four of Amy’s murderers were released due to their statements that the killing had been “politically motivated,” her father shook their hands and declared:
The most important vehicle of reconciliation is open and honest dialogue…we are here to reconcile a human life [that] was taken without an opportunity for dialogue. When we are finished with this process, we must move forward with linked arms.
Why does “moving forward” always seem like “falling downward”? Has all this “hate” skewed my equilibrium?
Whether Haitian interlopers are killing and eating house pets in Springfield, OH doesn’t seem like the biggest problem here. They are killing children, though. At least they haven’t eaten any white children yet. But even if they did, I’m not sure their parents would mind.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
59 comments
The Department of Justice has something called the Community Relations Service that essentially acts as a crisis management firm for nonwhites. I suspect the CRS or some other agency contacts these parents and feeds them this poisonous rhetoric, though the parents must be very weak to accept it.
This is part of why the white uprising in Britain was so shocking to an American. In the US, black murder is a fixture on any episode of the local news. Half the white population is numb to it, the other half either celebrates it or says the real tragedy would be to say something mean about blacks.
By contrast, I recall a video from 2016 where a family member of Keith Lamont Hill(shot and killed in Charlotte by a black police officer) said this on the news:
“I just know that all white people are fucking devils. All white cops are fucking devils, and white people.”
Wouldn’t it be nice for just once to hear a white person say something even close to that after having one of their own family members brutalized by a black person? They can even thrown in the ubiquitous NAXALT reminder.
“Half the white population is numb to it, the other half either celebrates it or says the real tragedy would be to say something mean about blacks.”
Obviously, there’s something fundamentally wrong with us as a collective. The number one duty as parents is in protecting our children. We seem to have lost that, hence, a people who do not protect their children have no future. NATURE always has the last word.
Many thanks to Corday for telling us why there’s such a thing as “grief counselors”.
People are never more vulnerable to suggestion than when they are hurting over a terrible loss. It seems getting to them quick is a priority in racial killings. A mind that is confused, angry, and needs to act out is just a perfect sponge for a well-trained manipulator.
My bet is daddy was furious and a clever shrink pushed his anger into the right channel for his public statement. This explains the strange behavior of white families terrorized by racial outsiders in recent years.
It’s called psychological warfare for a reason.
“In order to live like Aiden, you need to accept everyone.” Well that about sums it up perfectly. Aiden isn’t alive. He is dead at 14, and it is because he and his parents accepted everyone.
In other words, “If you accept everyone, you will die like Aiden.”
I see we will get to further express our love by housing and feeding this Haitian for the next nine years while he is in prison.
Imagine the insane cost of importing these people and ask if they will ever contribute anything of worth to our society.
A lot longer than that. More like the rest of his life.
No it said a minimum of nine years. You mean he’ll be on welfare after that?
Yes, I meant it that way. After serving his time, what are the odds he’s going to go straight and not just schlook money from the public fisc for the rest of his life.
There was a time when alien felons were deported after serving their sentences, but that doesn’t appear to be a thing anymore.
I had to look up schlook. That’s a very handy word, thanks.
It has been noted that during the terminal stages of imperial decline, a preference for the exotic Other is a feature, combined with elements of oikophobia, as Roger Scruton called the felt need to denigrate the customs, culture and institutions that are identifiably “ours.”
But the d**kless abyss of self-abnegation and fervent worship of the Alien current among our race is, to my knowledge, without precedent in all of human history. Even Orwell would be shocked.
Thank you for another intelligent comment from another aging Boomer like me.
White preservationists (WPs) must understand that our race contains a large number of what I call “genomic defectives”, like this shitty father Nathan Clark (“genetic defectives” refers to persons sadly born in some way injuriously abnormal, like being congenitally blind, without legs, retarded, etc; “genomic defectives” are those whose genetic heritage inclines them towards collective suicidalism, usually expressed as PC, wokeness, excessive and “unconditional” forgiveness {not a Christian concept at all, please note!} for scum: in a word, “progressivism”).
These genomic defectives are leading our race to self-destruction. There is no arguing with or persuading such people (and even if I’m wrong about that, WPs must recognize that we don’t have the leisure or time to do so before our race reaches a terminal point past which rebirth becomes impossible). If the white race is to endure, these white genomic defectives must be separated from racially healthy and normal whites.
In memory of an old PSA on TV.
This is your brain. (Egg) This is your brain on cultural Marxism. (Egg frying) Any questions?
This is your brain on 2024 years of Rabbi Jesus.
If that were the case, there would be more instances of anti-racist murder excusing in the distant and far more Christian past, though I don’t deny many of the parents who forgive their children’s murderers do it for religious reasons.
If that were the case, there would be more instances of anti-racist murder excusing in the distant and far more Christian past
Let’s hope everyone gives C-C enough to fund Goad’s on-the-ground coverage of P Diddy’s trial, assuming he’s not subject to an epsteining first.
I tried to squeeze this one into the article, but it didn’t fit the narrow purview: David Sirota’s “Let’s Hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a White American.” It was written a day after the bombing and before the Tsarnaev Brothers were pinned as the culprits. I followed it up the next week with “Let’s Hope the Next Bomber is a Liberal Journalist.”
Another one that didn’t make the cut was the case of Landen Hoffman, who survived after being tossed off a third-story balcony at the Mall of America in 2019 by a black male.
voting for Tweedledum or Tweedledee of course will solve all that. Don’t know how, but that is what “they” say.
No, voting for one candidate over another won’t solve everything and give you 100% satisfaction. But considering how degenerate and anti-white the Democrats are, a Trump victory will steer the country toward sanity, and that’s important. It also gives you an opportunity to flip off the Democrats, which is good for morale at least. Not voting leads to Democrats winning. They will use every fraudulent trick in the book.
It’s all so sad and upsetting to read. Unfortunately, it’s something that has also affected the whole of the West. There are just as disgusting parents here, the best known are probably
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Maria_Ladenburger
But there is much more…
Two of the men who killed Amy Biehl were later hired by her father to work at the foundation he started in her memory.
Hearing all of these surreal quotes from the parents of these victims makes me wonder if they themselves come up with this stuff, if a lawyer perhaps puts these words into their mouths or if these groveling diatribes come from politically weaponized struggle sessions that the parents finally put a stop to when they read from the script.
Someone named Rosenberg probably waved a blank check in front of Nathan Clark and said, “The more convincing you are, the more completely you gaslight the fools, the larger that number will be.” How could it be otherwise? Brainwashing may explain part of it, but where are the man’s emotions? Certainly he understands that his son would still be alive if not for the Haitian bluegum.
Nope, you either do not fully understand the racial sickness that affects leftist whites alone amongst the world’s peoples, or you are unwilling to acknowledge that such genomic defectiveness is both a real aspect of our race, and the chief culprit in white decline. I have come across such defectives a few hundred times in real life, and of course countless times in print. Haven’t you?
Unfortunately, yes, I’ve crossed paths with with countless ethnomasochists. People who seemed to have fairly sound instincts 20 or 30 years ago have developed some kind of intellectual rot. But in my previous comment I was referring to a sub-rational reaction to the death of a child at the hands of another–a unique and grievous event that ought to be impervious to psychological manipulation. If your theory is correct–that this ethnomasochism among white people is a defect at the molecular level–then we really are in deep shit.
Nothing but genetics can account for hysterical white concern with white racism – and only white racism. I believe this has now been documented, at least social scientifically if not (yet) biologically. White liberals are psychologically the most outlier group in the world (in terms of standard psych tests, like those purporting to measure ethnocentrism).
There’s no gene for being opposed to white and only white racism. This is a dumb idea born within the last century. Our genes didn’t suddenly change.
@Dr. Johnson:
There’s only rarely any single gene identified with a specific condition. I’m inferring from the universality of white behavior across nations with widely varied racial histories and present circumstances that genetics (ie, some constellation of genes) ultimately accounts for why whites are the race most susceptible to racial guilt and ethnomasochism. Not all blacks are good at basketball; not all Orientals are good at math; not all whites are ethnomasochists – but the respective “racial bell curves” are clear enough to permit generalizations.
Moreover, I would call attention to the work of English evolutionary psychologist Edward Dutton (which for me remains for the moment sadly at secondhand, except for some of his essays published at The Occidental Observer; but I have read many reviews of his books), who seems to argue and document that, yes, our white collective gene pool has changed quite a bit over the past century, with our modal “mutational load” greatly increasing, which Dutton in turn blames for the modern derangement of the Left (many of whom he labels “mutants”).
I myself, although lacking in any comparable scientific background, actually was hypothesizing something similar as far back as the mid-90s. In trying to account for white racial weakness in the postwar era, it occurred to me that the answer might well lay in the simple fact that a hugely disproportionate share of our race’s “tough guys” (my not unreasonable assumption being that toughness, courage, virility, also have very substantial genetic components) had idiotically been killed off in the two “world” wars. Certainly, the dysgenic horror of WW1 has been commented upon since the 1920s. WW1 did not simply produce a Lost Generation psychologically, but also genetically, as so many of the West’s “finest” slaughtered each other in fruitlessly brave sallies for a few hundred yards of muddy ground.
Ideas are crucially important, to be sure, and our race is obviously at present in the death grip of some very, very bad ones. But ideas are like spores; they come to rest and fructify upon a preexistent genetic substrate.
Sad to see that he was beckoned to the podium like a child, as “Nathan” rather than “Mr Clark”. Looking at the mother, taller than him and severe, nodding her head as the father spoke, wearing battle fatigues and a low-effort ponytail, you just know that he had to say what he said. This couple (mainly the mother who runs things), are not amenable to reason. Their conversion will need to await a change in the moral consensus
For all of the talk about how terrible “hate” is, I remain unconvinced that “hating” is a bad thing in and of itself. Indeed, it can even be a good and healthy thing. The word hate simply means “to feel an intense or passionate dislike.” A blanket statement that “it is wrong to hate” implies that feeling extremely angry or disgusted about something is never justified!
Dismissing someone who passionately objects to something as a “hater” and therefore “bad” takes the focus away from the thing that he opposes, and the merits of taking action to stop it, and instead pathologizes the objector.
If I wished to inflict upon a group of people a set of conditions that I knew they would find distasteful, immoral and disgusting, the task would be made far easier if I could first conquer them psychologically. What better way to do this than to convince them that it is immoral to passionately express their anger and disgust with my actions? Ideally, I would try to incessantly promote the message of “anti-hatred” to the point where my victims would police their own words, thoughts and emotions so as not to be “hateful.”
I suggest that if someone is telling you not to “hate” or is attacking you as a “hater”, they are likely doing so precisely because they wish to trick you into accepting otherwise disgusting and intolerable conditions. Therefore, it is probably wise to hate anyone who tells you not to hate!
“Hate” is a liberal cliché. Anger is what people are feeling, but liberals are so out of touch they can’t figure it out. Why should they bother to come to a genuine understanding of what’s really going on when they can just mindlessly repeat stale buzzwords? A true understanding is reality. Reality is hard. Liberals prefer fantasy and make believe. They want an understanding that makes them feel good about themselves.
Nathan Clark makes me think of filmmaker Michael Moore. What they both share in common is that they’re both hicklibs. A hicklib is a person of rural and/or working-class background who seeks to gain status and sophistication by affecting luxury belief systems in order to impress their social superiors, or at least to experience the cheap thrill of feeling superior to their working-class peers.
Another example of a hicklib is Heather Heyer’s mother Susan Bro. Here she is talking about white privilege and racism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNFKonUDHdU
Excellent observation. I have learned something that hadn’t occurred to me previously.
For all of the talk about how terrible “hate” is, I remain unconvinced that “hating” is a bad thing in and of itself.
To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:
…A time to love, and a time to hate
Ecclesiastes 3:1-8 (King James version).
I imagine there’s a regiment, if not an entire army, of Christian saps tripping all over themselves re-interpreting what is pretty clear. They’d likely start with quoting Christ’s advice to love our enemies. Be perfect as your Father in heaven, blah blah.
Aiden Clark’s father told the courtroom he didn’t want his son’s death to be exploited by the racist creeps who traffic in “hate”.
—
Dave Chambers: September 20, 2024 … I suggest that if someone is telling you not to “hate” or is attacking you as a “hater”, they (sic) are likely doing so precisely because they (sic) wish to trick you into accepting otherwise disgusting and intolerable conditions…
—
True. Some of us race-thinkers cannot be tricked into believing bullshit spouted by imbeciles like Mr. Clark.
Not to nitpick, Dave, but don’t fall for the popular feminization of pronouns. Any indefinite pronoun that ends in “one” is always singular. If the gender of the antecedent subject is not given, a masculine pronoun (he) is called for. The femlibs hate it when we follow old accepted grammar rules like that.
I tend to use “he or she” instead of just “he” or just “she” unless there is a reason to think that only males or only females are involved. Some folks think that is awkward and that I should substitute “they” and “their” but I’m still struggling with that. It does probably irritate a certain class of humanity. It all depends on whom you are talking with or writing to. No need to make enemies is my thinking; we have to know when we would be endangering ourselves by using “he” no matter what.
Stronza: September 20, 2024 I tend to use “he or she” instead of just “he” or just “she” unless there is a reason to think that only males or only females are involved.
—
That is considered acceptable and I’ve done the same in certain cases, but it can be considered a cop-out to please a certain class of humanity that has come to oppose us who reject feminism.
—
Some folks think that is awkward and that I should substitute “they” and “their” but I’m still struggling with that. It does probably irritate a certain class of humanity. It all depends on whom you are talking with or writing to. No need to make enemies is my thinking; we have to know when we would be endangering ourselves by using “he” no matter what.
—
Ours is a masculine movement, Stronza, opposed to the feminization of our traditional culture, including our language. We shouldn’t worry about offending “non-binary” freaks who believe males should be able to use females’ bathrooms and compete against females in sports. They will oppose us, even hate us for not going along with their agenda. Dr. Pierce addressed that, here: “WLP90: The Feminization of America” at nationalvanguard.org
Where should we draw the line? Should a transsexual be an “it” or maybe a “they?”
I heard a comedian point out the absurdity of improperly using a plural pronoun:
A soldier was in the trench with his fellow combatants. He excitedly shouted out to them, “Here they come!” Turns out there was just a lone enemy approaching. No reason to panic to please the pronoun police.
“Dismissing someone who passionately objects to something as a “hater” and therefore “bad” takes the focus away from the thing that he opposes, and the merits of taking action to stop it, and instead pathologizes the objector.”
That is so very well said… I’d never been able to quite put into words that insidious thing they do with the word “hate”. It has always seemed to me such a clumsy and childish label, the way it is used to denote anything that opposes the eradication of White people and our culture. You’ve got it exactly right, Dave Chambers!
I’m reminded of a case several years ago in St. Louis when a black robbed people, then shot a man, one of them, and crippled him from the waist down.He was a Gulf War vet, and immediately said the black guy robbed him “because he needed money to feed his son,” and this vet offered to financially support the family of this gunman who paralyzed him for life.
Also, my adopted niece, when ten years old, spoke how in class she learned that “white people should build houses for black people.”
Andrew Anglin said in 2020 that blacks were understanding that it was okay to kill whites, but the word really hadn’t gotten out yet. Now, they’re getting it.
One recalls the great massacre of whites in the Jamestown colony in the 1630s. Whites let Indians come into their houses, and then the Indians started killing them. One wonder how soon we’ll get to that. People can smell weakness.
Also, my adopted niece, when ten years old, spoke how in class she learned that “white people should build houses for black people.”
Seems that they are doing so. Dark people are over-represented as recipients of cheap housing (no interest, no down payment, etc.) thru Habitat for Humanity, a Christian nonprofit organization Mr. Jimmy Carter, who is holding out for his 100th birthday on October 1st, was an enthusiastic participant. He’d go with his box o’ tools and actually help construct these houses.
In my memory, white people did qualify for these cheap houses but I think they are in the minority now as regards this largesse. Oh, well! “We” design & build bridges; may as well live underneath them, too.
@S. Clark – I gasped out loud reading the anecdote about the paralyzed Gulf War veteran who offered to support, for life, the family of the primate who paralyzed him for life. I’d heard before of even more vile examples of this White sickness — ethnomasochism — but that one truly shocked me.
In a sane world leftists would be hunted for sport and cash prizes.
Send the leftists on a one way journey to Haiti – perhaps one day it might happen!
Actually, Steely, watch the classic The Hunt, where you see liberals hunt down “deplorables.”
Just when you think you’ve heard the most degrading cucked statement from a White man this pops up, truly embarrassing. This self hatred has to stop.
I have a weird theory that these sorts of White people instinctively know that blacks aren’t people like themselves. That they are animals, basically. And just like when tigers and elephants kill people, they don’t react with anger because they know that the animals are just following their natures. And they are drawn to befriend them because White people love to understand and befriend animals. Look at the millions of videos on YouTube of animals appearing to show affection beyond their natural bounds. Titles such as ‘the chicken that thinks it’s a dog!’ etc. The comments sections are full of people in awe of how something so different can be so much like us. I think it is an expression of Faustian man, another example of our will to conquer nature. I think this is why some people are drawn to adopt non-White children as well. They are captivated by the idea of having a close relationship with something so different from themselves. Also, part of the appeal with blacks for liberals is that they like the thrill of taming a dangerous being. I remember watching Tiger King years ago and one of the cast members said that the people who are attracted to keeping big cats tend towards narcissistic behaviour. Are those Whites that parade around their black friends really any different?
My initial reaction to these parents is revulsion, obviously. But Aiden’s father clearly think that he is morally superior to us, or rather less animalistic than us. What I suspect he is doing is actually showing extreme willfullness in forcing himself to overcome his baser drives towards anger against the killer black. Like an anorexic refusing food, he can’t give himself permission to succumb to his animal nature, his survival instinct.
I agree with you. I think the best peephole into such a mindset is the movie Grizzlyman about the life and death of Tim Treadwell.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0427312/
Much of the footage of that documentary was shot by Treadwell himself, doubtless with the idea that he would make his own hagiographic movie. Perhaps titled Bear Defender: The Tim Treadwell Story, or some such.
The impulse among well-off whites to look down on their poorer brethren as deplorables is a major stumbling block to our collective survival. One that is fully exploited by the usual suspects.
As for Nathan Clark’s wordpuke after his boy’s death, much of that can be attributed to social conditioning that he’s been bombarded with his whole life.
I know of the story, and I don’t really feel able to condemn him here, although I would to a more impressionable audience. What made Treadwell think he could be a bear is also what made White men think they could be like birds and conquer the sky. They did, and now we have the F22 Raptor, and have been beyond even the sky into space. I know very little about philosophy but I know I’m not the first person to consider how difficult it is to reconcile our human soul with our animal form.
I agree with you also. I would say as well that I suspect it hasn’t been too uncommon, historically, for upper class Whites to see themselves as being ethnically separate from the poor. Even the most benevolent of elites has a sense of innate distinction (such as here at Counter-Currents). Self-loathing can come into it, but I don’t think it explains all of the pathological behaviour. It’s only suicide if you recognise that the body is yours.
Interesting point.
The problem begins with White self-loathing. People use the other-directed gaze to try to fill the void left by the loss of confidence and alienation that the collapse of White life has wrought. Anti-Whiteness is socially acceptable, whereas pro-Whiteness has been anathema for decades.
Yes, although I think it is more of a collective self-loathing, with the individuals not aware that the body is eating itself. I think the majority of these liberals have very strong, positive identities, which are built on the negation of their larger self.
In evolutionary Psychology, hate is a survival mechanism. Without it humans are doomed!
I was convinced and more so everyday that it’s not an illegal immigration problem. It’s a spineless, self hated white people problem. All what this country became, is a consequence of a profound cowardness of whites without pride, honor, and courage. You can’t fix the problem without naming the problem. Unless we look into the mirror and admit it’s our fault, it’s a result of our inaction, indifference, ignorance, inability to stand up for ourselves and overwhelming desire to be “loved” by people who will ALWAYS hate us, nothing is going to change and it’s going to the very predictable end. Sooner than one can imagine.
You are utterly correct, Amy. A certain strain within the white race is the cause of our downfall – much more so than Jewry, which simply exploits this preexistent genetic defectiveness.
If your screen name accurately reflects your gender, any idea why so many white females are so ideologically pusillanimous wrt nonwhite aggression, esp when white females are so often the target of that aggression? “Logic” would suggest that white females should be far more racialist than white males, given that they are at greater physical risk from ‘diversity’. Yet they seem to be much less so.
@ Lord Shang – Re your questions about female behavior towards racial strangers, could it be some kind of corruption of the maternal instinct? Women are discouraged from having children, poisoned by feminism, yet nature demands they find an object to “mother”? What I think is even more likely, is a subversion of the survival instinct. Women are physically smaller and mentally weaker, no matter what the mass media propaganda portrays. Sensing that non-Whites are dangerous and a threat, perhaps they attempt to be overly amenable towards them for self-protection? I’ve read that women are hard-wired to be super-agreeable to people they are in fear of, even if it is only a subconscious fear, as a survival instinct.
it is an election year in the US.
We will vote our way out of this.
really.
cd: September 21, 2024 it is an election year in the US.
We will vote our way out of this. really.
—
Too late for that, cd. Really. Mass democracy is no solution.
Strict racial separation is the only solution. Leave Aiden Clark and his brain damaged ilk out of our separatist communities. They have their own communities where we are not welcome. That’s a start.
This was an excellent post, worthy of extensive forwarding to normie conservatives. These race cucks damn themselves. We must be grateful to Goad for gathering these disparate episodes of blatant white racial “suicidalist” psychology; collectively, they should be eye-opening for anyone with a scintilla of commonsense.
I come from the Eastern Europe, where, as you know, only a small number of dark-skinned people live. Visiting countries in Western Europe and America, I have always been shocked at how easily the Whites there accept the de facto replacement of the white population by Arabs, Turks and other Muhammadans, swarthy Indians, slant-eyed Asians, Negros and Mestizos.I later realized that a large number of Whites really don’t mind this change and some, especially the wealthier and more successful ones, personally benefit from it.
I think that’s the crucial black pill that’s mostly not talked about here: on an individual level, most Whites are threatened by other whites rather than, say, immigrants from Asia. In particular, most middle-class Whites live in a fiercely capitalist competitive environment where their competitors are almost always other Whites. In such circumstances, threats to the White race do not appear to be a priority for individuals, and it is difficult for them to find solidarity with other Whites.
And it is actually more profitable for the elites and the rich if poorer Whites are replaced by a mix of third world peoples.
So we can say that it was capitalism and its principles that eventually killed off the white European nations and their civilization.
Nathan Clark seems to listen to the BBC too much if you get my drift.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.