1,391 words
I have a confession to make: I am a regular reader of the Jüdische Rundschau. The JR is a monthly Jewish newspaper that ranges from the moderate Right to the ultra-conservative, and as such does not necessarily feature what some on the dissident Right might view as “the typical Jewish narrative.” I suppose you would be hard-pressed to find many other Jewish newspapers praising the German Right-wing party, Alternative for Germany. In fact, it’s not only Jews who write for the JR, but also well-known names from the German Right.
The Jüdische Rundschau takes a hard stance on Muslim immigration into Europe and condemns Germany’s liberal, Left-leaning politics — if only because it has made life in Europe for Jews extremely dangerous by now. So yes, of course the JR is still a newspaper for a mainly — if not exclusively — Jewish readership, and it looks at the world from the perspective of what is best for Jews . . . at least the conservative ones. There is no lack of criticism of Jewish liberals, for example.
Many articles in the JR are reprints or translations from other Jewish media outlets. I kept two of them that were reprinted in its April 2023 issue for future use — but since I have no idea what that use might be, I give them to you for your edification.
The first one, “The real threat to Israeli democracy” by Melanie Phillips from the Jewish News Syndicate (JNS), is simply hilarious. While dealing with the clashes between the political Left and Right in Israel, it criticizes a “victim culture.” I kid you not.
Without being anchored in a network of duties, rights amount to nothing other than demands. Accordingly, universal human rights law helped create “victim culture” with groups competing for preferential treatment on the basis of their presumed powerlessness.
Human rights law is innately biased towards “powerless” minorities and against the “powerful” majority. This was acknowledged by the eminent English judge Lord Bingham, who said in a speech in 2008 that human rights legislation is “in one sense undemocratic in that it is counter-majoritarian,” since its purpose is to protect the politically powerless.
Trouncing the majority thus became identified with virtue. “Powerlessness” gave self-identified “victim groups” an exemption from their own obligations while, simultaneously, allowing them to demand privileges from society.
You can buy Charles Krafft’s An Artist of the Right here.
Yes. You can’t make that stuff up.
The other article, “A new phase in U.S.-Israel relations” by Caroline Glick, also from JNS, is much more interesting, and I would love to see one of the politically savvy writers here at Counter-Currents tackle it. The Jüdische Rundschau very much sang Trump’s praises, and as such is extremely critical of what the writers consider Joe Biden’s lack of commitment to Israel, so it is not surprising that they chose to translate Glick’s article.
As Glick warns her readers:
The administration’s statements and actions this week, coupled with its overall policies towards Israel since entering office, indicate that Israel has reached a new phase in its relationship with America. Until now, Israel had a strategic alliance with the United States. Now as a decade of polling has shown, Israel is viewed with hostility by some Americans. The poll showed that overall, most Americans are more supportive of Israel than of the Palestinians. But for the first time, 49% of Democrats are more sympathetic towards the Palestinians than towards Israel. A total of 38% of Democrats are more sympathetic towards Israel.
Basically, Glick calls for a recalibration of Israel’s “strategic posture” toward the United States, perhaps by withholding support for Democrat leaders or perhaps via a change of alliances away from the US to other potential allies altogether.
She continues:
It is impossible to know whether the Biden administration will want to negotiate another long-term military aid agreement, and it is also unclear whether Israel is better or worse off maintaining its position as a recipient of U.S. military aid. Israel may be better off paying for U.S. military platforms out of its own pocket and transforming its relationship from that of a client into one of a partner in defense technology development.
A third article, this one from the latest (August 2023) issue of the Jüdische Rundschau, is also a reprint, this time from Israel Today. Titled “Exodus II — Spike in worldwide antisemitism sparks mass emigration,” it especially addresses the situation in Europe. Dr. Fred Wright, in an interview with author Charles Gardner, openly names the unbridled influx of Muslim immigrants as the problem — in stark contrast to the mainstream media around here:
Another spokesman, Mehdi Hasan, has pointed out that ‘anti-Semitism isn’t just tolerated in some sections of the British Muslim community; it’s routine and commonplace’.
Holland’s Jewish community have been advised to emigrate to avoid increasing harassment by young Muslim fanatics. Chief Rabbi Binyomin Jacobs said he and his wife would leave if not for their responsibility for those still there. ‘I’m like the captain of a sinking ship,’ he declared. And Dutch novelist Leon de Winter predicted that when Israel celebrates her centenary in 2048, the last Jew will leave Europe.
France, the scene of much chaotic rebellion in recent days, has a shadowy history of antisemitism that peaked with the notorious case of injustice against a Jewish army officer witnessed by journalist Theodor Herzl who thus concluded there was no future for Jews in Europe. He duly launched the Zionist movement that sparked ongoing Aliyah to Israel. Some academics consider that Nazi ideology could just as easily have developed in France as in Germany. And the situation now appears worse than ever, exacerbated by Islamic-led elements, with Jewish educational establishments located on first floors with bomb-proof doors and security guards outside.
In the past few years there has been an ever-increasing number of Jews leaving major cities. Grenoble has seen half the Jewish community flee and Nice has witnessed a drop from 20,000 to 5,000. In Toulouse, where much of the Jewish community arrived from North Africa in the 1960s and 70s following Islamic expulsions, they have felt constrained to move once again — no less than 50% of them. ‘In a few decades there will be no Jews in France,’ one Jewish leader said.
Jews in Belgium also suffer great hostility, with the Chief Rabbi of Brussels, Albert Guigui, no longer wearing a kippa in public for fear of violence and Israeli journalist Eldad Beck reporting that ‘there is a good chance, in twenty years, of ending up with a [judenrein] Belgium.’
Antisemitic incidents are also rife in Germany — an average of five a day in the first ten months of 2022 — less than 80 years after the Holocaust shocked the world. A particularly low point saw Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas, at a press conference in Munich last year, outrageously accuse Israel of having perpetrated ‘50 Holocausts’ against the Palestinians! Semen Gorelik, Jewish community chairman in the state of Brandenburg, has announced that he is leaving Germany for Israel and urged German Jews to follow suit due to the rising tide of antisemitism there.
A similar situation exists in Austria, where the Jewish community president of Vienna said: ‘The challenge of rising antisemitism is a global phenomenon and we are working closely with all strands of society to combat it.’
Sweden, once a paragon of tolerance, now has the third highest rate of antisemitic incidents in Europe, once again mostly due to Islamic tensions, with the number of Jews in the city of Malmö plummeting from 3,000 to 600 in just a few short years.
Meanwhile neighbouring Norway risks becoming one of the first countries without a Jewish presence. Due to Islamic tensions, the synagogues of Oslo and Trondheim are the most securely protected buildings in the country and Aliyah has found a renewed focus. The picture is similar in Denmark while in Spain, four decades after the demise of General Franco’s dictatorship, opinion polls continue to reveal deeply-rooted antisemitic clichés.
And whereas Italians generally are not antisemitic by conviction, there is a residual suspicion of Jews because of the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church. And even in Greece, despite its relatively small Jewish community, antisemitism is an ongoing concern.
Of course, it is worth noting that while Fred Wright clearly states that the rise in anti-Semitism in the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Belgium, and even France is to a degree the result of Muslim immigration, he is silent on that detail when talking about the Axis of Evil . . .
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here.
14 comments
<tears in eyes while laughing>
Exactly! I was alternatively sobbing and hysterically laughing. What a sad joke!
re: Exodus II
The rats leaving a sinking ship. Same thing happened in South Africa. This terrifying ability of the Jewish super-organism to move around the globe, with assistance from their ethnic welfare structures, is another consequence of the Nuremberg moral paradigm. Jewish migration to Western countries in the golden age of anti-semitism between the wars was very difficult. Just another reason why the internet is a threat to ‘Our Democracy’.
Golly, whose bright idea was it to let all those Muslims into Sweden?
https://theredarchive.com/blog/Return-of-Kings/what-the-hell-is-wrong-with-sweden.13039
Jewish “Conservatives” are about as helpful to whites as Al Sharpton is.
Come on, Counter-Currents. You’re better than this. Don’t be like American Renaissance.
Who said anything about “helpful”?
He didn’t read past the headline and the first sentence.
There is much evidence (albeit suppressed!), that the National Socialists and the various European (and American!) Jewish organizations were involved in transporting Jews, from internment camps, into Palestine so as to populate that British province with Jews! The mistake of Hitler’s rule was not to ship ever Jew to Palestine, then recognize it as the State of Israel..! The Jews would have of loved him , and in emptying Europe of their presence, there would not have been Muslim problems in the “old continent”! Menachem Begin actually approached the Nazis, and asked their help in expelling the British from Palestine with the help of his Irgun…….if only…?
The internment camps stage were not needed at all for free emigration with the possessions:
The Haavara Agreement (Hebrew: הסכם העברה Translated: “transfer agreement”) was signed on 25 August 1933 after three months of talks by the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of the Jewish Agency) and the economic authorities of Nazi Germany. The agreement was designed to help facilitate the emigration of German Jews to Palestine. While it helped Jews emigrate, it forced them to give up most of their possessions to Germany before departing. Those assets could later be obtained by transferring them to Palestine as German export goods.[1][2]
Contrast: when you managed to escape from a communist country you were sentenced to a prison term and full confiscation, in absence.
I haven’t previously heard of the French Civitas movement or Pierre Hillard. I looked to see whether you’d discussed this and finding you hadn’t, thought I’d suggest it. This French intellectual suggested at a meeting that perhaps, in line with French historical norms, Jews should perhaps not be given citizenship. The response was an almost instantaneous banning by the government. He’s not a group leader, just a member. Lots online, though mainly from Jewish news media.
The mere mention of The Chosen elicits a pretty visceral reaction in these parts, to say the least, but I hope that affected readers can come to recognize an informative article, like this one, when they see it.
This is an informative article. In it, the author merely says, essentially: “I routinely read a Jewish newspaper. When doing so, I’ve noticed some things. Some of those things are takes on issues about which we here tend to be concerned. Here are the details; you might be interested.”
There was no editorializing. No prescribing. No admonishing–explicitly or implicitly–to ally with Jews or to see their takes in any one way.
An informative article.
Informative articles like this are useful. Taking the time that many readers wouldn’t take, to synthesize the information (and thereby save everybody else’s time) is a useful service. Then, later on, when someone needs information about this or that, here it is in the archives, retrievable with nominal effort on our part, her having done all the labor.
I know I’m not going to routinely start reading Jewish newspapers. I’d rather she do that grunt work, and just give me the gist.
It seems she has a soft spot for them. I am not surprised, as they are the Victors of the colossal struggle of the 20th century. But we, the few who have chosen to continue the struggle, know that, victor or not, they are not worthy of our sympathy. We are everything that they are not , and vice-versa.
Muslims don’t trust Jews- and with very good reason. After all who has spearheaded Islamophobia and the global war against terror i.e. Muslims. And who is killing a Muslims on a daily basis if not the Jews in Palestine? Muslim response is reasonable.
I know both conservative and liberal Jews. Claiming they are a uniform entity is as deep as claiming Giorgia Meloni or Robin DiAngelo represent all white women or all Italians. Every interest group has an attitude of let’s do what’s good for us… well everyone except paleface.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.