Counter-Currents
5,109 words
Let us move on to the reign of Benedict XVI, where we will perhaps find cooler, clearer, more Teutonic air — though perhaps with a whiff of the plague air from foretelling death in Venice. For as it turns out, the outstanding cardinal here is the pope himself, the former Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger.
Another pre-War figure, Ratzinger seems to have stepped out of the pages of a Thomas Mann novel; he’s the kind of “good European” that Western civilization used to produce among the haute bourgeoise:
A devotee of Goethe and the Latin and Greek classics, with a love of the paintings of Rembrandt, the young Ratzinger wrote poems and learned the piano. Early on, he fed on German philosophy, Heidegger and Nietzsche — the kind of food that often leads to anti-humanism, and Ratzinger is, in fact, very “anti-Enlightenment.”
When Ratzinger speaks of the student revolt of May ‘68 as “nihilist deviations,” he knows what he’s talking about! And he even joined the Hitlerjugend! He seems almost an alt-rightist avant la lettre, or perhaps a figure of the Neo-Reaction or Dark Enlightenment; Pope Moldbug? [1]
Against that, he also learned from Nietzsche that “without music, life would be a mistake.” He “was wild about German music from Bach to Beethoven,” and especially Mozart. In opera, Ratzinger’s taste was “not Mediterranean but Teutonic: the subtlety of Cosi, the ambiguous erotomania of Don Giovanni, and of course, the quintessential androgyny of Apollo et Hyacinthus”; papal observers would not be able to decide if he was a liturgy queen or an opera queen.
And of course, the clothes; oh, the clothes.
As soon as he was elected, this eccentric pope became the heart-throb of Italian magazines: a fashionable figure, seen wearing all the fashion houses of Milan, as once Grace Kelly, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, and Elizabeth II had done.
Benedict XVI was so keen on haute couture that he had a flock of tailors, hatters, and cobblers hanging on his heels.
Benedict XVI had a marked liking for accessories. . . . The most famous was a cowboy hat (think Brokeback Mountain) but in bright red. In 2007, Esquire magazine put the pope first in its list of personalities, under the heading “Accessory of the year.” [2]
Is Cardinal Ratzinger, the only modern pope to abdicate (supposedly for health reasons), homosexual? In fact, no one knows, and the truth is far more interesting.
From the musicians Joseph Ratzinger likes, the androgynous figures he highlights in the operas that enchant him, the writers he reads, the friends he surrounds himself with, the cardinals he appoints, the countless decisions he has made against homosexuals, and even his final fall, partly wrapped up in the gay question, we might hypothesize that homophilia was the thorn in Joseph Ratzinger’s flesh.
Homophilia as an internal “enemy” [3]: is that the personal experience of this troubled and “insecure” pope who has always spoken of his ‘“great weakness,” his “holy anxiety,” his fundamental “inadequacy” and his secret loves “in different dimensions and different forms,” even though, of course, he adds: “going into intimate details would be out of the question”? How can we tell?
We can say that Ratzinger has taken from his deep immersion in the Western tradition, from Plato to Augustine to, yes, Jacques Maritain, the concept of the “loving friendship” so often promoted in the more daring circles of Catholicism. [4]
And so we come to the last, and still ongoing, of Ratzinger’s protégés; his own personal George Clooney, Georg Gänswein. [5]
Gänswein has the athletic physique of a movie star or a fashion model. His Luciferian beauty is an extra. In the Vatican, they often mentioned the charm of actors in Visconti films. For some, Georg is Tadzio in Death in Venice (for a long time he too had long curly hair); for others, he is Helmut Berger in The Damned. We might add Tonio from Tonio Kröger, perhaps, because of his heartbreakingly blue eyes (and because Ratzinger has read Thomas Mann, who writes so cogently about repressed or thwarted inclinations).
Needless to say, “Gänswein was a severe conservative, a traditionalist and anti-gay, who liked power [and] was close, in Écône in Switzerland, to the Saint Pius X Fraternity of Msgr. Lefebvre, the far-right dissident who was finally excommunicated.”
Martel carefully notes that “We have to acknowledge that we know nothing about the particular relationship between Pope Benedict XVI and his private secretary. No one, even in the Vatican, has been able to establish the truth. It’s all speculation.” And yet this “loving friendship” gives us the key, to Ratzinger and the failure of his pontificate: fighting his own “inner enemy,” he created “the gayest papacy in history.”
Benedict XVI had no other ambition than to impose his own virtues on others and, faithful to his own vow of chastity, he was only asking homosexuals to do as he did.
In fact, Cardinal Ratzinger has always been careful, as no prelate has so clearly been before him, to distinguish between two forms of homosexuality. The first of these, homosexuality lived and emphasized, gay identity and culture, is intrinsically disordered. What Ratzinger rejects is the homosexual act. The weakness of the flesh, sexuality between men — that’s the sin.
On the other hand, and this point seems to me to have been neglected, there is a homosexuality that Ratzinger has never rejected, even elevating it into an indispensable model, far superior in his eyes to carnal love between a man and a woman This is ascetic homosexuality, which has been corrected by “superhuman legislations”: this struggle against the self — energetic, incessant and truly diabolical — which in the end opens up into abstinence. This triumph over the senses is the model towards which the whole of Ratzinger’s personality and work has tended.
We might say that if he rejects ‘LGBT’ individuals, Ratzinger does not reserve the same harsh treatment for those who hesitate, those who seek, those sexual agnostics, those who are ‘questioning’, the ‘Qs’ in the American terminology, who appear in the new formulation LGBTQ!
Ratzinger forged this ideal of the abstinent homosexual saint and repeated it in his encyclicals, motu proprio, apostolic exhortations, letters, books, and interviews.
Christian perfection! Homosexuals weren’t asking for that much! [6]
Here we are at the heart, the very quintessence, of the Ratzingerian system. In other words: all the intellectual and artistic passions of Joseph Ratzinger.
Accepting the homosexual as long as he renounces his sexuality. And what heroic man, by means of self-flagellation, can achieve such a feat? Perhaps a Ratzinger or, by making sacrifices, a replicant or a Jedi! For everyone else, the “normal people” who know that abstinence is unnatural, Benedict XVI’s thought leads inevitably to a double life, and as the Poet [Rimbaud] puts it, “the old lying loves” and “lying couples.”
Did he not gullibly open the door to countless hypocrisies in a Church that was becoming homosexualized at a great rate? [7]
Confident in the solution he has found for himself — to the point of imposing it on the Church itself! — Ratzinger, like Dorian Grey, or Wilde himself, [8] acquired a sense of personal invulnerability, lending his actions an odd kind of integrity. Thus, when elevating his protégé to the archbishopric, Benedict conducted not a mere mass but a “Fellini-esque” pageant rivaling anything in the imagination of Baron Corvo:
First comes the procession, slow, superb, and choreographed to perfection; the pope with his huge topaz-yellow mitre, standing in a little indoor popemobile, a throne on wheels, travels like a giant the full 200-metre length of the nave to the sound of triumphant brass, beautiful organ sounds and the children’s choir of St Peter’s, straight as unlit candles. The chalices are encrusted with precious stones; the censers smoke. In the front rows of this new style of episcopal organization, dozens of cardinals and hundreds of bishops and priests in their finest robes provide a palette of red, white and ox-blood. There are flowers everywhere, as if at a wedding.
Indeed, a wedding, and at the climax:
The pope spends a long time (19 seconds) [9] stroking the salt-and-pepper curls of his George Clooney, with infinite delicacy along with infinite prudence. But “the body doesn’t lie,” as the great choreographer Martha Graham used to put it. [10]
Such insouciance even wins the heart of Martel:
Stubborn, with his legendary hostinato rigore (“obstinate rigor” is the motto of Leonardo da Vinci), the pope did not try to conceal what he was doing, as so many cardinals do when they promote their protégés; he went completely public with it. That’s what I’ve always admired about him.
In his way, Joseph Ratzinger remained loyal to his singleton, in spite of the frantic warnings of the Curia. This high mass was a magnificent statement. And that day, he was radiant. His restrained smile was a marvel. Having drained the chalice to the dregs, he was not afraid of taking another drink from it. He is handsome. He is proud. Magnetized by his own daring, he has won. Seeing him again in the video, so superbly dramatic, I have perhaps never loved him as much as in that moment.
That may be going a bit too far, but Ratzinger definitely emerges as the most interesting character, not just in the chapter but the book as a whole; he deserves a better biographer, but then perhaps only Thomas Mann could do him justice. [11]
His thinking is that of a man who has remained locked in the homophobic ideas of his time. In the end, and more than when I began, I feel a certain tenderness towards this introverted, locked-up, thwarted man, for this tragic figure whose anachronism haunts me. Today, tens of millions of teenagers all over the world, less literate or intelligent than he, are able to decode the same puzzle within a few months, before they turn 18.
Though Cardinal Ratzinger seems to have found a resolution for himself, as Pope Benedict, he fought a losing war on two fronts: imposing impossibly rigorous rules on homosexual laity, in the face of an increased level of acceptance in society at large; [12] while at the same time looking the other way at seemingly celibate homophile clergy, turning a blind eye to malicious “rumors” and even favoring such for promotion.
Ratzinger’s downfall was precipitated by two factors: a series of scandals, including the VatiLeak I and II affairs, led him to commission a report (from the aforementioned cardinal fossils) which stunned him by its revelation of how extensive the “rings of lust” that surrounded John Paul II had metastasized; and second, he went to Latin America, where he received the coup de grace from the revelation of how “active” his clergy had been.
“We know that a very significant number of clergy who . . . are demonstrating against . . . gay marriage are homosexual themselves. It’s unbelievable,” the Minister of Culture, Rafael Tovar y de Teresa, tells me during an interview in his office in Mexico. “The religious apparatus in Mexico is gay, the hierarchy is gay, the cardinals are gay. It’s incredible!”
The homosexual life of the Mexican clergy is a well-known, and by now a well-documented, phenomenon. It is estimated that over two-thirds of Mexican cardinals, archbishops, and bishops are “practicing.”
In short, the Mexican clergy is said to be actively heterosexual in the countryside and practicing homosexual in the cities!
Emiliano Ruiz Parra, author of several books on the subject and a former journalist reporting on religious questions for the daily newspaper Reforma: “I would say that 50 percent of priests are gay in Mexico, if you want a minimum figure, and 75 percent if one is being more realistic. The seminaries are homosexual and the Mexican Catholic hierarchy is spectacularly gay.” He adds that being gay in the Church is not a problem in Mexico: it is even a rite of passage, an element of promotion, and a normal “power relation” between the novice and his master.
“There is a lot of tolerance within the Church, so much so that it is not expressed outside it. And, of course, to protect this secret, clerics must attack gays by appearing very homophobic in public. That’s the key. Or the trick.”
As for Cuba,
In a country where corruption is universal, and where there are no journalistic or legal safeguards, it is hardly astonishing that the Catholic Church should have developed bad habits here more than elsewhere.
But it was “astonishing” to the rather unworldly Benedict. “This wasn’t a matter of missteps or accidents; it was a whole system . . . the Church was everywhere corrupt.” The pope wept, then, two weeks later, resigned.
The Vatican “system” had crushed the Ratzinger system.
What, then, is to be done? Martel, despite assuring us of his affection for the Church, simply doesn’t get it; his attitude seems to be puzzlement over why the Church doesn’t just get with it, baby, and change already, maaaan; everyone else has. He doesn’t seem to grasp that not being like every other denomination, not being in tune with a world gone wrong, is exactly the appeal; certainly to TradCaths and others who see the Church as part of their revolt against the modern world.
Part of Martel’s impatience may be the sign of an agenda, shall we say. While abolishing priestly celibacy would seem to be the simple solution, the obvious step, for Martel it’s all a package deal; he quotes with approval the “concrete suggestions” of Peruvian politician and LGBT activist Carlos Bruce:
I think the Church must accept all the consequences of moral failure: it must stop criticizing homosexual relations between consenting adults, and authorize marriage; then it must abandon its silence about sexual abuse and completely abandon its general and institutionalized cover-up strategy, Finally, because this is the key to the problem, it must end the celibacy of the priesthood.
Finally? I suppose that might be a logical order, but hardly a practical one, especially if the “final” factor is the “key” (as it is indeed). Abolishing priestly celibacy (which, if I understand these arcane matters, is a matter of “clerical discipline” adopted by the church at some point, rather than a divine commandment or theological dogma) would be relatively easy. It would hardly mean that “the gays won.” In fact, it would dilute their power of numbers, while removing the “anti-homosexual” façade behind which they do the devil’s work. The requirement obviously discourages heterosexual candidates, while modern Western society (call it enlightened or degenerate, as you will) gives homosexuals more attractive options; abolishing it would increase vocations and bring in a swarm of “non-parishioners,” to use the Vatican equivalent of “not a friend of Dorothy.” [13]
He also doesn’t grasp that perhaps the Church’s position on homosexuality is actually correct, or at least well-reasoned enough to deserve a rebuttal; the book is notably lacking in any discussion of theology or philosophy — Ignatius Reilly would certainly disapprove. For this author, who campily references his lodestone, Rimbaud, throughout as “The Poet” the way Aquinas would refer to Aristotle as The Philosopher, philosophy or theology is as foreign as color to a blind man; people come and go throughout having various attitudes and predilections, as unique and inexplicable as their tastes in wallpaper or costumes, and presumably as mutable over time. [14]
However, the Church’s immutability is something of an illusion, or rather, a comforting self-deception; but to make that case, you’d have to be not just able to take an objective look at your church, or at least be a well-disposed outsider, but also something of a theologian, or at least someone who takes ideas seriously: like, say, Phillip Sherard, a Traditionalist who converted to Greek Orthodoxy. [15] In his Greek East and Latin West, [16] Sherrard observes that from the Greek perspective, the Latin Church has been home to the most radical and rapid changes — “innovations” — which are responsible for the schism between the two; but each time, the Church turns to its other Latin characteristic — pettifogging legalism — to convince itself and others that nothing has changed. [17]
Homosexuality would seem to be an easy enough subject for the Roman method of “everything must change to stay the same.” [18] Jesus says quite a bit about the Holy Spirit, yet this didn’t stop the Latin Church from “innovating” a new doctrine, even at the price of alienating the Greek Church; by contrast, despite the modern obsession with it, Jesus never mentions homosexuality at all. [19] A bit of typically opaque mumbo-jumbo to keep the theology queens happy, and hey, presto!
An even easier method would be the practice among Episcopalians in the 19th century; treat homosexuality as a sin, but merely one sin among many, no greater or lesser than any other. [20] This would appear to be Francis’ solution, at least for the time being. Hence, his occasional remarks such as “Who am I to judge?” or suggestions that the Church has become identified with sexual sins and perhaps some time should be allocated to the others as well; for which remarks, of course, the closet cases of the Vatican and their ingenuous TradCath supporters have denounced him as, of course, a heretical homo!
All this is a bit beside the point, though; unlike Sherrard, most Traditionalists consider any kind of change to be anathema in principle — especially in order to accommodate mere human weakness, perhaps exacerbated by the conditions of the Kali Yuga, while for TradCaths, the Church is supposed to be a soothing island of stability, as well as a bulwark against the modern age. Once all those early ethnic conflicts (see: Gangs of New York) got ironed out or forgotten by the 1880s or so, the Roman Church became the gold standard for those seeking “Tradition;” [21] in the postwar environs, even not a few Jewish liberals, who would eventually be called “neocons,” unwelcomed by their Jewish colleagues, chose to convert to Catholicism.
And they may, after all, have a point; Dissident Rightists of the Protestant persuasion should not be smug at the travails of the Mother Church: perhaps abolishing celibacy, even requiring marriage, may not be the answer; perhaps it does, along with divorce, lead down the slippery slope to gay and women priests and gay marriage, along with the rest of the progressive package, as has become common among Protestant denominations. On the other hand, we must ask: if the Roman Church can own-goal itself to this extent, what basis would we have to look to it as a silver bullet against Globohomo?
Perhaps the ultimate lesson here is that moral rigidity is less of a bulwark against evil or a sign of perfection, and perhaps more of a vain show, covering up a greater evil; that was the lesson Nathaniel Hawthorne drew from his meditations on his witch-burning ancestors. Using the Traditionalists’ own method, [22] we might distinguish moral laxity, moral rigidity, and morality itself, using the example of Zen:
[People] who feel a profound need to justify themselves have difficulty in understanding the viewpoints of those who do not, and the Chinese who created Zen were the same kind of people as Lao-tzu, who, centuries before, had said, “Those who justify themselves do not convince.” For the urge to make or prove oneself right has always jiggled the Chinese sense of the ludicrous. . . To Confucius, it seemed much better to be human-hearted than righteous, and to the great Taoists, Lao-tzu and Chuang-tzu, it was obvious that one could not be right without also being wrong, because the two were as inseparable as back and front. As Chuang-tzu said, “Those who would have good government without its correlative misrule, and right without its correlative wrong, do not understand the principles of the universe.”
To Western ears, such words may sound cynical, and the Confucian admiration of “reasonableness” and compromise may appear to be a weak-kneed lack of commitment to principle. Actually, they reflect a marvelous understanding and respect for what we call the balance of nature, human and otherwise — a universal vision of life as the Tao or way of nature in which the good and the evil, the creative and the destructive, the wise and the foolish are the inseparable polarities of existence. Therefore, wisdom did not consist of trying to wrest the good from the evil but in learning to “ride” them as a cork adapts itself to the crests and troughs of the waves. At the roots of Chinese life, there is a trust in the good-and-evil of one’s own nature which is peculiarly foreign to those brought up with the chronic uneasy conscience of the Hebrew-Christian cultures. Yet it was always obvious to the Chinese that a man who mistrusts himself cannot even trust his mistrust, and must therefore be hopelessly confused. [23]
This is the wisdom of the Franciscan Pope, Francis: “Behind rigidity, something always lies hidden; in many cases, a double life.”
If you want to support our work, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every Friday.
Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
Notes
[1] Martel observes that Ratzinger was actually one of the liberals at Vatican II who “saluted its modernity”, but “had taken fright” at the events of ‘68 and resolved to undertake a conservative reading of the council. Not for the first time, the “conservative” simply wants to return to the liberal regime he grew up with (or, in this case, created).
[2] As Patsy Stone has taught us, “you can never have enough hats, gloves, or shoes.”
[3] Alluding to Pasolini’s characterization of his homosexuality: “I always saw it by my side as an enemy.” Written in 1950, we must note that both Roy Cohn and J. Edgar Hoover fought the “invisible enemy” of Communism.
[4] And Anglicanism of the High Church sort: “And stay away from Anglo-Catholics; they are all Sodomites with atrocious accents.”—Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited: The Sacred and Profane Memories of Captain Charles Ryder (London: Chapman & Hall, 1945 [i.e. 1944]).
[5] Known in gay circles, based on the German pronunciation of his name, as “Gay.org.” Clooney seems to be the Vatican consensus, but I’d say he resembles a bit more Glenn Howerton of It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia, which, with his repressed homosexuality, narcissism, and suggested serial killer tendencies, also seems more appropriate.
[6] Martel is not theologically sound enough to point out that this is, as we’ve said above, the old heresy of encratism. More irony: the great theologian, the reviver of the Inquisition and the Index, driven by the oldest heresy!
[7] Martel aptly quotes Horace: “Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret” (Drive away nature with a fork, it comes back at a gallop).
[8] “Ratzinger had the grandeur of Oscar Wilde who, when warned of the danger he ran in associating with young Bosie, appeared in public with him more often.”
[9] 1:00 to 1:30 in the video. To be fair, it does start as a blessing to his forehead, but it continues on and on to Joe Biden lengths.
[10] I always thought that was Woody Allen.
[11] Or perhaps we could settle for Andrew Sullivan, who wrote this of the rather similar Allan Bloom:
Of all people, he knew the centrality of the things about which we remain silent. . . . Retaining the purity of that longing was his life’s work. The reason he disliked the modern cult of easy sex was not because he scorned or feared the erotic life, but because he revered it. He saw sexual longing as supremely expressed in individual love, and he wanted his students to experience both to the fullest. He not merely understood Nietzsche; he imbibed him. But this awareness of the abyss moved Bloom, unlike Nietzsche, toward love. . . . One day, one hopes, there will be a conservatism civilized enough to deserve him. . .
“Longing: Remembering Allan Bloom,” The New Republic, April 17, 2000. Sullivan appears in Martel’s book as the “famous British-born American blogger” who insisted in print that Benedict was gay, while admitting to having no evidence, other than his behavior with Georg. Sullivan has reviewed or based columns on the book, and is quoted on the cover, although never mentioning his appearance therein. Speaking of Bloom, Saul Bellow’s roman à Bloom, Ravelstein, suggests Bellow might have made a good biographer for Ratzinger as well; the lightly fictionalized Straussian atmos’ of Ravelstein circle — his “puppies,” to quote Strauss, Persecution and the Art of Writing (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1952), p. 36 — recalls Maritain with his “godsons.” Ravelstein recalls attending a dinner with Bertrand Russell, T. S. Eliot, “and some big-shot French Thomist whose name escapes me (Maritain?).” Or again: “In art you become familiar with due process. You can’t simply write people off or send them to hell.”
[12] “More perhaps than [any] another man of his generation, Joseph Ratzinger has run counter to history.” Again, the alt-right note: would Savitri Devi say he was a man against time?
[John Paul II] has made the number of priests dwindle sharply by insisting on celibacy, and he has ended up not only with a smaller number of priests but with a diminished band that is less celibate. Almost all of the priests who left in the massive hemorrhage of the 1970s and 1980s left to marry. The homosexual priests stayed, which meant that their proportion of the whole went up even when their absolute numbers stayed the same. And now even that absolute number is rising. Many observers suspect that John Paul’s real legacy to his church is a gay priesthood.
Garry Wills, Papal Sin: Structures of Deceit (Doubleday, 2000), p190.
[14] He is helped by the Church’s leading authority on Thomas himself being on his side. “Brother Adriano Oliva is a reputed medieval historian, a seasoned Latinist and a doctor of theology. Most significantly, he is one of the world’s most eminent authorities on Saint Thomas Aquinas: he presided over the famous Leonine Commission responsible for the critical edition of the works of the medieval thinker — a seminal work. Saint Thomas Aquinas, as we know, is generally the guarantee on which conservatives rely to oppose all sacraments for divorcees or homosexual couples.” In his Amours (Les éditions du Cerf, 2015), Oliva aims “to show that a desirable change on the part of the Magisterium concerning homosexuality, and the exercising of sexuality by homosexuals, would correspond not only to contemporary anthropological, theological and exegetical studies, but also to developments of a theological tradition, Thomist in particular.” For Saint Thomas, “man, with his irregularities and singularities, is therefore part of the divine plan. The homosexual inclination is not against nature, but comes from the soul. Oliva again: ‘homosexuality does not bear within it any illicitness, neither in its origin, natural to the individual and rooted in what animates him as a human being, nor in its aim, loving another person, which is a good aim.’ And Oliva concludes in calling for ‘the welcoming of homosexual people at the heart of the Church and not on its margins.’”
[15] For more on Sherrard, see James L. Kelley, Philip Sherrard: Orthodox Theosophy and the Reign of Quantity (Norman, OK: Romanity Press, 2016).
[16] The Greek East and the Latin West: A Study in the Christian Tradition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959; reprinted Limni (Greece): Denise Harvey, 1992, 1995, 2002); see also Church, Papacy, and Schism: A Theological Enquiry (London: SPCK, 1978; reprinted Limni (Greece): Denise Harvey, 1996).
[17] Sherrard also wrote frequently on matters of love and sex (see his Christianity and Eros: Essays on the Theme of Sexual Love (London: SPCK, 1976; reprinted Limni (Greece): Denise Harvey, 1995, 2002); at the time of Humanae Vitae, he wrote a blistering critique, from the Greek perspective, of Paul’s arguments as being based on a fallen, not redeemed nature; he says that this “may pass as an adroit piece of legalistic or moral quibbling, but it is surely a very pathetic argument with which to present the mature Christian intelligence and conscience.” See “Humanae Vitae: Notes on the Encyclical Letter of Pope Paul VI,” Sobornost 5.8 (1969): 570-580 (576-77).
[18] “This is the way Church teaching has always evolved over the centuries — one small step, one minor adjustment, at a time — until the substance has changed so substantially that it becomes possible (according to temperament) either that change has come — or that teaching has ‘always’ been thus.” See “Humanae Vitae: Cracks in the Wall?“ which discusses Peter Steinfels’ article on the 2015 Synod of Bishops, which notes that “in sum, while some may assume that the “intrinsic bond” between conjugal love and procreation or the “inseparable connection” between the unitive and the procreative or ‘openness to life’ must apply to each and every instance of sexual intercourse rather than a larger pattern of marital behavior, nowhere do the Synod fathers spell out that conclusion. The bishops were surely aware that this is the nub of the contraception controversy. Yet not only in these paragraphs but in many others, they refused to repeat the linchpin of the official teaching.”
[19] Jesus alludes to the punishment of Sodom, but the point of his allusion shows that he agrees with Ezekiel that “the sin of Sodom” is inhospitality, in this case, not welcoming the disciples. Paul, by the way, has two places where he references something very bad, that seems to have something to do with sex, but uses two different words that scholars are still trying to decipher; anyone who tells you Paul or anyone else mentions “homosexuality” or “Sodomy” is just lying.
[20] See the discussion in Douglass Shand-Tucci, Ralph Adams Cram: Life and Architecture. 2 volumes. Boston Bohemia (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1994); Ralph Adams Cram: An Architect’s Four Quests (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2005).
[21] Even then, and as always, those seeking “tradition” and homosexuals were often the same; elder WASPs could only look on in horror as their children succumbed to the Whore of Babylon, the way a later generation would run off to communes; see Shandy, op. cit. and my discussion of “Ralph Adams Cram: Wild Boy of American Architecture,” reprinted in The Eldritch Evola . . . & Others: Traditionalist Meditations on Literature, Art, & Culture; ed. Greg Johnson (San Francisco: Counter-Currents, 2014). “Beware of Anglo-Catholics,” warns Cousin Jasper, “they are all sodomites with atrocious accents.” (Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited: The Sacred and Profane Memories of Captain Charles Ryder (London: Chapman & Hall, 1945 [i.e. 1944]).
[22] “It is question of starting from the essential intuition of a content which ideally precedes the parts, and the comparative research must serve to illustrate this content with the contribution given by its various forms of expression, as they present themselves to us in diverse formulations and in diverse traditions.” Julius Evola, “Vedanta, Meister Eckhart and Schelling,” reprinted in East and West: Comparative Studies in Pursuit of Tradition (San Francisco: Counter-Currents, 2018).
[23] San Francisco: City Lights, 1959; from Chicago Review 42. n. 3 (Summer-Fall 1996): pp. 49 (8).
3 comments
The subject of sex and the church is of high importance. Here are my thoughts on the subject.
When the trials for White Genocide begin, do not forget to punish the non-Jews.
I’ve noticed that many writers and content creators on the dissident right and even the mainstream right giving warnings about not overreacting and suggesting basically getting in a defensive posture; get your families out of danger areas, increase your supplies of spam and baked beans, water, a generator, extra supply of medications, do your jumping-jacks, etc.
This is sagacious advice; but while these folks suggest actions for the safety of your body and the soundness of your mind, I write this to prepare your soul. I prepare your gut for the punch that is about to come. I’m not going to tell you something pretty here.
The late Bob Whitaker said before he died to not let the non-Jews off for their role in White Genocide. He was very adamant about this. For years, I though these ‘non-Jews’ meant the WASP Eastern Establishment in the United States and Anglo elites in the UK; some sort of Illuminati organization. After further examination of this issue, I’ve come to see the error in my thinking. While the WASPS, on both sides of the water, are contributors to White genocide, I don’t think they were the originators. I especially believe this about the WASPs in America; their foundation money may be involved now, but they were at the forefront of immigration restriction, eugenics, abortion and opposed American involvement in both world wars. The WASP elites in America and the UK were just outmaneuvered by a more ancient, and socially sophisticated outfit.
The true “non-Jews” behind White genocide have been liars from the beginning; the organization that’s been partners with the Jews for centuries, actors that fight via deception and active measures, that hide in plain sight; this hidden enemy is, of course, the Church of Rome; and by now, the whole of organized Christianity. The Jews are just part of the team.
I told you this wouldn’t be easy. It broke my heart when I saw the light. If I was Michael Corleone, then the Church would be Fredo.
You must understand that our enemies are masters of soft power, but maybe more importantly, masters of sexual degeneracy. The recent 3-part series at Counter Currents by James O’Meara is a good place to start to understand sex and the Church, but it doesn’t go far enough.
We know that religions maintain power by controlling the people’s minds with stories, symbols, and rites. This is how they control the masses. But they also have to control the people that control the levers of power and they do this most effectively with blackmail. They find people to blackmail by setting up compromising situations; usually sexual.
The Jews, of course, were and are the front for vice. For most of Christian history in Europe, you’d go to the Jewish quarter of town to get a whore. Maybe someone inquires a little and finds out you like males. You figure, who’s going to believe the “Christ killing, perfidious Jews” if they spoke about it? Then you find out later that actually people from the Church were witnesses to your secret sex. Being accused of adultery would have been a problem for a common man throughout Euro-Christian history, but sodomites were treated very, very poorly (to put it in a Trumpian way).
You see, the Church doesn’t actually run or own the whore house in the Jewish quarter of town. They’re Christians, thus they are “nice people” and “very good,” so they would never do that. However, they’ll happily collect a tax on the down-low from the Jews, but more importantly, use the arrangement for compromise operations. The mafia later became useful for these same operations. Think about who runs the classic scum part of town in big American cities; peepshows, strip clubs, porn shops, call girls, call boys; it’s the mob or Jews. The gay section of cities, especially in large Northeastern cities, would have deep connections to an organization which is 50-75% homosexual.
People wonder why the Jews were tolerated in the middle ages, well now think about why the mafia have been tolerated by the Church. Part of the ceremony for becoming “made” in the mafia involves burning a card of a saint in your hand. Why would these “very good” and “nice people” from the Church not be outraged that their demi-gods (Saints) were being misappropriated by a criminal organization? Papa Francisco is actually harder on the Mob than any Pope before him. The various Mexican and Latino gangs probably act in the same way as the Italian Mob; very likely Cartels have to pay some tax on the down-low as well.
The reason the Abrahamic religions have such harsh judgments on homosexuality, is because by making homosexuality punishable by death or extreme humiliation, you have a cadre of people that you can control by setting up compromise operations. There will always be some small part of the population with same sex attraction; they know this. The controllers of the Western world have been studying human psychology for centuries. The sacrament of “Confession” was a perfect laboratory for the Church to learn about human psychology, but also again, learn compromising information that could later be used to set up compromising situations. This is why security clearances for intelligence agencies always include questions of past sexual behavior. They know that the faggot you don’t know is more dangerous than the faggot you do know. I’ll discuss the subject of Dangerous Faggots later.
If you ever wondered why all the congresspeople folded on every so called “civil rights” issue against Whites since WWII, you have the answer, they were compromised. Every Congressperson and Senator has to live part of the time in Washington DC. What a perfect place to run compromise operations; all these powerful people in one place; probably been going on there for a long time. Why would Abraham Lincoln start a war that could have been worked out, under the impression that he’d be sending the black slaves back to Africa, only to be whacked, thus never getting the opportunity to repatriate the former slaves? There’s a reason why the gay republicans have Lincoln as their Saint; Lincoln was likely gay and compromised, as was likely his thespian killer. I wonder who might have wanted Africans to remain in the country? There’s no question they were used in the time of reconstruction in the same ways non-Whites are used today; as a revolutionary vanguard against the White population. By the way, general Sherman was Catholic.
Ever wonder why American foreign policy is run from Georgetown University? If the Jews run America, why Georgetown?
Why is the Supreme court 6 to 3 Catholic to Jewish? Not one born and raised protestant on the court in the United States of America?
Why is the CIA referred to as “Catholics in Action?” Former CIA man, and closet homosexual, William F. Buckley started National Review and kicked out all the America first right wingers.
Why do the people in the heights of power (Left or Right), push forced mass immigration and forced assimilation? George W. Shrub, and his brother Jeb are open borders Cuckseratives. Jeb converted to Catholicism and married a Mexican woman. Why would a man from one of the most powerful families in America, who would have the pick of the litter as far as women, marry a Mexican woman of such low social class?
We know about all the Jews in the heights of power in America, but are you familiar with the Knights of Malta? Go read the membership lists of this organization. Notice that these knights include Jews. Does being a Jewish Knight of Malta make you better than just a plain Jew? Somebody ask the Logos rising crew? How many members of the Supreme Court are members?
What the Church wants to do is bring Whites back into the Catholic fold. Back us into the sheep pen that is Christianity; specifically, under the Roman Church, with the Jews as their longtime teammates. The Jews were always allowed to “survive but not thrive.” But Euro-folk religious practitioners were wiped from the planet as were the sacred groves. European pagans were slaughtered while the Jews were allowed to run vice and loan shark operations. Then, when the masses would react to Jewish vice with an anti-Jewish pogrom, the Church would come in a put it down.
Besides flooding the US with Latin American migrants, it appears the strategy is making life so unbearable that you see the Church as the only option. The trannies in the bathroom, trannies reading to kids, sexualization of kids, disorder on the streets, profanity; all of this is being carried out by political leaders that are compromised or ideologically programmed by institutions that were staffed by the compromised.
All the mainline Protestant Churches are fully SJW, but the Catholic Church remains true to the traditional family. Compared to what we see now, the Catholic Church’s order would be a relief. But this order will come with a price and this price is open borders with Mexico and all of Latin America; race mixing with the world, because all are “one in Christ.”
The real reason for Vatican II, and the “opening up of the church,” was to better infiltrate and corrupt the mainline protestants. Bring them into their network, compromise people, then put these people in place to make these Churches lose all legitimacy; lesbian-trans bishops, the whole catalog. Vatican II was not the work of Jewish infiltration; it was a loosening magical operation to expand networks with a future plan to bind these networks back to the Church. The Catholic dominated Supreme Court does all they can to bring in immigrants, but what perplexes people is why they hold up laws that expand LGBTQ+ rights? It goes back to subversion; they want to cause as much chaos as possible so they can be the ones that bring the New Order. The Judges will just be blamed on “Americanism” and “liberals.”
The Jewish-Church alliance is really off schedule. The longer-term plan was to flood America with Latin American migrants over a longer period of time; maybe 50 years. The plan was to create the “Kingdom of Guadalupe” in Western hemisphere, turn Europe into a shithole, with government supported Muslims against rebel White Nationalists in something that will look like 90’s era Balkan Wars; then bring over the Kingdom’s troops, under the command of Jeb Shrub’s son or grandson, to re-Catholicize the whole Western World. This is probably why Europe never spends much on their military budgets. They were supposed to be weak militarily, so the Kingdom’s troops would have an easier time. Something threw off their plan, and forced them to speed it up.
White identity politics are growing. And the Church sees this as the biggest threat to their New World Order. They have to discredit the movement against White genocide, but more importantly, the very concept of White identity itself. The Jewish-Church alliance wants to provoke a reaction from Whites so they can frame the discourse going forward as “see, both the radical left post modernists, and the neo-Nazi White supremacists are the same, we all must be Christian now, because Logos or something.”
A quick aside, the Church calls itself the organization of Logos, THERE’S JUST ONE PROBLEM! If you claim that the Garden of Eden, Noah’s ark, Resurrection, Assumption, etc. are real events, you can’t be the organization of Logos. Just because the author of the Gospel of John claims Jesus of Nazareth is Logos, doesn’t mean anything. In fact, if ‘reason’ is one of the definitions of Logos, then we can use Logos to discredit the organization that claims it as 1/3 of its god.
The Church is truly the enemy that fights via deception. Stalin was a moron; his rhetorical question about “how many divisions does the Pope command” was moronic. If it was all about armies and guns, why did Stalin bring back the Orthodox Church in Russia during the second world war? We can expect the Church to use pageantry and provocation. This provocation will come from outside, and inside the dissident right.
From outside, anti-whiteness is going increase. Looting and attacks on Whites will continue. The hubris of the anti-whites (especially BLM) is going to go into overdrive. These are people with little rationality, lots of resentment and very little foresight.
You can expect the debasing of White people and virtue signaling to reach heights never imaginable. You should expect women (and probably some men) to start sucking cock for “black lives;” ten-on-one gangbanging for black lives; swallowing excrement for black lives; aborting your children to atone for white privilege; and probably the rise of suicide cults that , for example, jump off cliffs holding hands to “remove whiteness from the world.”
This is all to get you to feel like there’s no hope. Your mind changes when under stress. This is why military units train by doing the same simple tasks over and over; when you feel you’re in mortal danger, chemicals are produced that cause you to not think rationally and just react. This is what the images on your television are meant to do to you. They want you to either submit to anti-whiteness or do something stupid. DON’T DO EITHER!!!
From the inside you will have continued efforts by bad actors encouraging people to commit acts of violence and/or destruction. These are people trying to push the idea that damaging critical infrastructure and committing terrorist attacks will somehow bring a trillion-dollar military-intelligence-industrial-media complex to the negotiating table. These bad actors in the dissident right are going to use the debasing and virtue singling explained above to belittle you and provoke you. They’ll accuse you of being a “cuck” and insinuate that you want to see your daughter get “triple penetrated by Tyrone and his bros.” The main provocateurs will be White Isis Guru Count Dotrouble of Provocation Inc. and his henchman toady John “Multi-Level” Marketeer; you can expect them to be very active in their provocation operations in the coming days. A key rule of thumb, if someone is asking you to act like BLM or Antifa, then their either stupid, or a bad actor. I don’t think these guys are stupid.
The enemies of Whiteness would love nothing more for some “White Supremist Neo Nazi Isis Satanists thatwanttokillsixmillionjews” take over a little space and play “White Afghanistan” for a few weeks in some mountainous areas of the US. This would allow the enemy to rally the country in a show of anti-white solidarity. The Jewish-Church alliance would love nothing more than for the power to get knocked out in some major city so they can have the American version of Syria’s “Dust Boy.” How about, “New York Giants Girl.” I’m thinking an 8 year old African American girl wearing one of those 1990’s Starter Jackets, in the Giants colors Blue, Red, and White; her grandma died when the building’s heat went out, due to the attacks (actually the money was stolen by her knucklehead grandson but whatever); she’s seen on TV warming her hands by one of those barrel fires, with her hood on, while inquiring to the TV man “why da waycists hate us for ah skin?” This author starts to tear up as I write this, so I’ll leave it at that but you get the picture.
After critical infrastructure is hit, I expect some kind of multiracial Infrastructure Guard Force to be formed; which would begin with 2 months of anti-white training, with co-ed dormitories I would presume. All the people with any connection to White Positive Websites will likely be arrested, and placed on house arrest with ankle bracelets. Many of these people will say anything the police tell them to say, allowing the anti-white authorities to craft a “vast, rightwing conspiracy.”
You can expect all the mind controlled, active shooter types to go into action at this time as well. Shooters, like the one in Australia, are almost guaranteed to be mind-controlled. But here again the origin of their becoming a mass shooter will likely be that they got caught doing something sexually immoral, and then abused over a period of time, in a way that made them more mailable to carrying out such a task. The Australian shooter likely was caught banging children in the Middle East, which probably has honey trap operations in every major city, on the behest of Western and/or Israeli intelligence (probably Russians too). The Atomwussen gangs and all the other poor fucks they have on ice primed for mass shootings will be ready to go.
Expect the “White Nationalist Neo Nazi Satanic killers” to be traced back to Russia, maybe Antifa as well. Last year at this time the radio was putting out memes of “White Isis” and fear mongering about terrorist attacks. I expect them to pick up this year with the same message. When the George Floyd riots started, they were trying to push the “White Nationalists behind the riots” narrative and even threw some “Russia involvement” in for good measure. I know many people on the dissident right think Russia are the “good guys,” but understand that there are anti-white elements inside Russian intelligence that will leak information showing “proof” of a Russia connection. Not all of Russia is “our friend,” as was chanted during the Charlottesville Rally. Also keep in mind that the Orthodox Church would gladly receive non-White Orthodox Christians into Russia.
Based on my analysis of the connections between certain actors in White Nationalism, this is how I see it going down. Andy Nowhitey and King Richard both started the original Alturdudive Right blog. They had a split because Nowhitey and King Richard disagreed on Christianity. Nowhitey was really disturbed about King Richard’s views on abortion. After the hail-gate event, Nowhitey’s new Alturdudive-Right II site was the first to denounce King Richard, saying that King Richard is not the Party, and the Party is not King Richard. It’s still not been verified if Nowhitey is connected to the Arch Prior of St. Latrobe Priory.
Like I said, this wasn’t going to be pretty, you can turn back now but I’m going to continue.
I expect audio and video will be “leaked” by the person who calls himself the “Dangerous Faggot,” who happens to be another person likely compromised sexually, and who is also likely an agent of the Church. The footage will show some big names in White Nationalism: King Richard, Dr “Big” Johnson, Bronze Aged Perverter, Millennial Hoes, Jim Gold, Greg Candy, Marcus “Hannibal” Bramis, Invictus Caesar, etc. sacrificing goats to Satan, using the blood for lube while sodomizing each other, Triumph of the Will playing on the screen and mounds of coke and bourbon bottles scattered about; all the while with said White Nationalists cursing Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, and screaming “POWERRRRRRRRRRR.” Expect the worst story you can imagine. I like and admire most of the people I mentioned here, but you have to understand that Whiteness is the biggest obstacle to the Jewish-Church New World Order.
They have to do something, and sex and pageantry are their specialties.
The Alturdudive Right and other “Logos Rising” crew members will be in full force saying “see, see White Nationalism is really just a bunch of homos who want to put the peepee in the poopoo” and that “you must become Christian or you’re either a Jew or homo.” After this recording is “leaked” you’ll see many of these White Nationalists become Christians. They will form a chorus together and sing songs like “All Are Welcome! All are Welcome! All are welcome in this place”
But they won’t be done there, this next part is critical. The Church has a history of big “spiritual events;” especially Marion apparitions. You might look into the last major Marion apparition “Our Lady of Fatima.” Here we have young girls that supposedly experience a visitation from the Virgin Mary, who tells them a message and to prepare for a sign on October 13th 1917. This would be a very simple operation. Bring a beautiful woman from South America that speaks Portuguese and have her play the part of Mary to the girls. Later during the light show, use some sort of technology creating an optical illusion. If you look at the footage of the light during the light show, it doesn’t look like a person, it’s just a ball of light. But because “Mary” said it would be there, at that time, the faithful masses were mystified. This event is evidence that the Church will use technology and pageantry to support their program. Technology has greatly improved since 1917, so you can expect the Church to be ready with something impressive. If Jesus, Mary, and Joseph show up and call for White Genocide, remember that the Church has a history of such events.
But the Church has a serious decision to make regarding the new apparition. If they do it, and it goes bad, then the gig is truly up. I mean, if they try a new “Our Lady at ________,” and people see through it, then Christianity will truly be discredited. At very least, the Roman Catholic Church will be discredited.
But it might not be a botched apparition that will discredit them but having a secret recording of themselves released. Imagine a recording from within the bowels of the Vatican that would make the White Nationalist “secret recording” look and sound like an Easter egg hunt.
If the Church is peopled primarily by homosexuals, you can expect them to be highly comprised from outside the Church as well. If a video surfaces showing Cardinals or even higher boy fucking (or worse), then it will be all over for the Vatican. It could be that the Church’s greatest weapon, sexual degeneracy, might be that which brings them down. An organization filled with homosexuals, that are supposed to be paragons of virtue, would be quite easy to compromise. Perhaps Papa Benedictus’ departure was the result of being compromised?
The Southern American center of the conspiracy in the US is Texas. It’s not a mistake that the Shrub family hails from there. The Shrubs are the connection in America between Church and the Crown in the UK. Texas would be another ideal place to have blackmail operations, oil men and the like; Texas has a long-standing Catholic presence. This is what might explain why Crazy Alex was found having tranny-porn on his phone. I expect Crazy Alex to be a key player in hyping any Christian apparitions. I had to spend time in Texas for business, I can feel anti-white evil flowing through the place.
But wait, it get worse, as I mentioned above, the Shrubs are corrected to the Church AND the UK Royals; and it is here where we find the 3rd person of the anti-White Unholy Trinity. Ever wonder why Britain fought in two World Wars against Germany, giving up their empire in the process, while gaining nothing but dead British men?
It’s easy, they were offered something bigger. They likely gave up their empire, to gain half the world. These are people that make plans in the hundreds of years. Giving up the empire in the 1940’s and gaining the new Holy Roman Empire in 2040 is a bold, but understandable plan of action. This is the second group of non-Jews that must be brought to justice for White genocide. Her Majesty does nothing as young British girls are raped and pimped on an industrial scale. If Her Majesty wanted to, she could end all immigration to the UK with a word. Don’t forget that the Shrubs are related to Her Majesty. Like the Church, don’t be surprised if someone has video of people in the Royal Families doing some heinous stuff too. At least one member, at the very least, hung out at the Magic Egyptian Island of Mr. Epsensaltstein. This tripartite conspiracy would cover the major roles of Indo-European society:
1) The Priest class (Church of Rome); 2) The Crown (focused on the British and other Euro Royals but also includes elite families in the US like the Shrubs); 3) Merchants (Jews).
Some of a Masonic bent might stand up and say, “that right, that’s why we smash Crown and Altar and why we, in the higher degrees, reject Christ and serve the Lord of Light, Lucifer.” As bad as Christianity is going to look, and as discredited as it will be, don’t fall for this either. The Center of Anglo-American Freemasonry is the British Royal family.
I suspect besides disturbing sexual recordings, that there will be signed documents and probably recordings of all these parties agreeing to White Genocide; explicitly, and with great pleasure, on whatever important parchments that the Vatican uses, lambskin perhaps, written in blood. I expect these kinds of recorded conversations and documents to be signed by not only these major parties, but also many major media personalities, business tycoons, entertainers, and academics.
Bob Whitaker said after 9-11 that no one would have to worry about anyone denying the next holocaust since it would be on CNN. The Church won’t have to worry about Saint Peter’s getting dustified from above when it will likely be the former faithful, bringing it down with hammer, ax, and torch.
This is where Papa Francisco comes in. I believe Francisco will be the one to close up the Vatican and end the centuries long conspiracy; literally living the role of “Last Pope.” He knows about all the sex and White genocide stuff. He might be the one that has to sign off on any apparitions and he is much less likely to do so than Papa Benedictus was. It might be Papa Francisco that saves the Church from total dustification by coming clean with the whole program and then ending the Papacy. Francisco will just be the Bishop of Rome. Since the Roman Church will be totally discredited, you’ll probably see what’s left get absorbed by the Orthodox. They’ll blame it all on the Franks, and the Jews too of course. In America Protestant Christianity will live on as the primitive Church, small groups of people meeting in their homes. The vast majority of Whites will move into a new Symbolic Organizing Principle.
Don’t be surprised if the dreaded Juden redeem themselves as this thing unravels. You see, the Jews have existed longer than the Church, and if they have to make a deal when faced with destruction, Jews will make a deal. If they have to provide some of these special parchment documents and recordings of White Genocide soirees with White children being sacrificed; they’ll do it when facing the dusty void. I realized from learning about Jewish-Church relations that the Jews are only part of a system that makes them vice peddlers. I’m pretty sure serious, pious Jews don’t care much for pornographers. I suspect the Jewish whorehouse operator throughout history was probably the scum among the Jews as well; but also likely compromised by an internal Jewish compromise operation. The Jews will be freed from their role in the Jewish-Church alliance, thus allowing them to revert back to a more primitive time as well. Their role as major power player in the White world will diminish. For any number of Jews punished for White genocide, I propose that double the non-Jews receive punishment.
In America, I expect elements from the old WASP families to regain control. When I read Byron Tully’s “Old Money Book,” I realized that there was no way that these people would capitulate completely. Like all Germanic peoples, they are very patient and out-of-the-box thinkers. They control their appetites and have more discipline than Jews or Latins. They also have less need to display their wealth. It might come down to the group that could controls their passions the best; they ride the goat; they don’t drink its blood.
Bob Whitaker said that the Shrubs were evil, and I don’t doubt this. We know that King Richard is connected to this family; many on the dissident right suspect him of being the center of the conspiracy to discredit White identity and this writing proves, so far, that I do as well. But I would ask you dear reader to read the Saga of the Volsungs. In it, you will learn that Germanic people will go to the greatest of lengths to get revenge on those who do them wrong. King Richard might be on tape getting pozzed with goat’s blood; or doing the pozzing as he initiates people, during the ritual for the final degree of the Apollo Cult. But that’s because he was the WASP’s man on the inside. That’s right; the Jewish-Church conspiracy thought King Richard was their fool, since he was introduced to them by the Shrubs, but he was the WASPs undercover man the whole time and he knows everything! And before people laugh at him for getting pozzed, go watch the FX show “The Americans.” In it you’ll see that deep cover operators actually get trained in being pozzed.
King Richard sounded very unhinged during the secret recording leaked by the Dangerous Faggot. He said he was a “king,” and that he would “ritually humiliate” the people responsible for the Charlottesville disaster. What if was telling the truth? I’m saying, what if King Richard was telling the world exactly what was going to happen once White Genocide has ended? Can you imagine the rage that must be inside him from all that ass pozzing. And if that’s what he had to do for his people and for the struggle against White geocide, won’t he then deserve to be King? Some people have podcasts, or write articles, but getting ass pozzed for White wellbeing is going above-and-beyond.
Now what about the Dangerous Faggot? The “leaky” one specifically, will likely be charged for his part in the conspiracy against White wellbeing, but for homosexuals in general, the answer is to remove them from the closet. Homosexuality will not be illegal; it’s better to know who the homos are. If you want to get or be pozzed, that’s OK; you just can’t promote pro-gay propaganda. No one has the right to harass or assault homosexuals. Life it difficult, if you need a same-sex life partner, that should be a legally recognized union, but it will not be on the same level as unions between men and women. The prick going into the snatch in sacred; we’re all here today because the prick went in the snatch. This solution will remove the Jewish-Church’s greatest weapon. They want to present this issue as a choice between the current sexual insanity and what the Church advocates. The solution I presented turns Dangerous Faggots into just faggots. And that’s better for everyone.
I very much hope this writing gets wide circulation; you must prepare to see everything you trusted and thought holy to be corrupted. The Abrahamic, Yahwehian order is coming to an end; the pillars of their temple crashed to the ground.
I beg you, White brothers and sisters, remain calm, don’t do anything stupid, but also remain strong in the face of the coming anti-Whiteness. While the era of Yahweh is coming to an end, the White Father, which art in heaven, is watching. He’s watching social media to see who will ingratiate themselves, and abuse their own children in the name of anti-whiteness in order to improve their social position. He’s watching to see who will be provoked into doing something stupid. He’s watching to see who is pro-White and who is anti-White; he has a list and he updates it often. Everything people put on their social media, everything said on the news, every email, every phone call, he has records of all of it. That way when the tide turns at his arrival, he’ll know if you’re genuine or not. When #CuckerTarlson tells viewers that “bending the knee will not be rewarded,” he’s not just posturing; he’s giving his viewers practical advice.
The White Father is coming back. His Yuletide ritual and veneration reminds us of this. Don’t be on his naughty list.
Unfortunately, some people on the right seem to laud Protestantism as the right wing Christianity par excellence:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/anglican-archbishop-of-canterbury-statues-will-have-to-come-down…names-will-have-to-change
LMFAO, james, what say you to this “self flagellation” of the LUTHERAN church????
I mean seriously, james, you can’t make this shit up…..
Lol, Papa Francis is looking a lot better than martin luther right now eh?
Francis is openly trying to undermine Salvini in Italy and covertly works against Orbán and PiS. The private agenda of homosexuals should not have precedent over the interests of Europeans. This article amounts to treason.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.