Counter-Currents
4,568 words
In the early days of GRECE, the think tank of the Nouvelle Droite (New Right), which included such luminaries as Alain de Benoist and Pierre Vial, it was considered necessary to make a clean break with the failures of the past, totems that many on the Right still clung to. This new generation of writers, mostly in their 20s during the cultural revolution of ’68, felt that nostalgia for a lost cause — and there were several — stood in the way of their values finding political and cultural support from the majority of their countryman. This left a void which the Left exploited without hesitation or limit.
Moving on is so hard, when the memories are so sublime.
In essays and pamphlets, the writers of GRECE systematically wrote what they were not, in order to clarify what they were still in the process of becoming. They were not seeking a return to monarchy, Vichy, pre-Vatican II Ultramontanism, classical liberalism, etc. At first glance, many Rightists asked themselves, “then what is left?” The fact that this was such a clean break and a fresh start, many were left to realize that they had lost touch with the essence of what their revered ancestors were fighting for.
The Alt-Right exists as a clean break in the American Right as well. At its intellectual heights it borrows heavily from the Nouvelle Droite, but familiarity with that school of thought is not necessary for productive action in the American struggle. However, this fresh start is well overdue. Today is a time to act, not simply for a set of values, but for our very survival as a people. Our genocide has been programmed into the system, and the political dead-ends of the far Right and the kosher poltergeists that attract truth seekers have been laid out before our path like so many trap doors. It is time to innovate or die.
Now at this late hour, the Alt Right has emerged. The time has come to clarify what the Alt Right is not in the American context. Many have rallied to this banner after reaching one of the following dead ends and some do not realize yet to what extent they must transcend that earlier concern in order to “secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.” This article seeks to create an understanding as to how these other schools of thought understand better than the mainstream narrative what is wrong with our society, but they fall short of providing a holistic view or a manageable solution.
1. Not Fighting for the One True Faith
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, founder of the SSPX, saying Mass at his Mission in Gabon
The Ecclesia Dei, the Ummah, and the “Universal Lodge” of the Mason have this one thing in common, the fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of Man. This is a chimera. A healthy, racially conscious nation needs spiritual values, but this works at cross purposes if that spirituality is universalist or if sectarianism dissolves national unity.
Some have tried to reshape the universalism in Christianity by taking three verses out of context in the hopes of making racial nationalism excusable. This approach to Biblical exegesis is not so different from the young earth creationists approach to geology . . . its conclusions are just as convincing.
There are some writers and activists who apply the “One True Faith” approach to Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy. Men like E. Michael Jones and Father Raphael Johnson can be called fellow travelers, to adopt the Communist terminology, but the primacy of their religious commitments diverts them from the primary goals of the Alt Right.
In the end, those fighting to impose the “One True Faith” do not care if we survive as a people. Ask any true believer and they will tell you that they have more in common with their co-religionist from the Congo than with a professor at MIT. The saddest thing is, sometimes it’s true.
2. Not Lobbying for the Interests of the Bourgeoisie
Gavin McInnes thinks that “revering the entrepreneur,” not masturbating, and wearing a suit 3 times a week will stop the destruction of our civilization. Race-mixing and Jewish media-political-financial dominance are not the problem.
Take a copy of Forbes magazine to your nearest welfare office and look over the list of richest individuals and highest paid CEOs. You will notice a lighter tone of skin on makers than on takers. This leads many well-meaning white people to conclude that defending the policies that make the efforts of those people in Forbes magazine easier (lowering trade barriers, eliminating regulatory oversight, and weakening unions, etc.) will unleash the greatness of our race. It is “Us or Them,” and we look a lot more like the CEOs than the welfare queens.
Some are even so foolish enough to believe that the handful of darker faces found at the top of corporate America are evidence that excellence is open to everyone. It is only a matter of culture and free will, rather than innate genetic differences, that keeps the country club white and the ghetto black.
The fact is more white people today are getting shafted by globalization than are reaping benefits. The pressures of the “free market” are preying upon the white Family. As Pierre Vial says, “the liberty promised by the American Free Marketers is nothing but the liberty of the fox to roam the henhouse.” This beast is eating our children.[1]
3. Not Wishing for the State to Disappear
Contrary to popular myth, there is no correlation between wishing for the fall and the ability to impose Order after the fall.
A close cousin of the previous dead end is the hope for the end of the state. There are two camps when it comes to how this will be accomplished: the libertarians believe that voting can make the state disappear, the self-proclaimed “patriots” believe that the entire global system will collapse, usually due to a lack of gold. Whether they expect a popular mood swing or an apocalyptic reckoning, the problems that are at the root of their attitudes are evident to every white person in the US.
The front line employees of the state are most often underqualified black women. The military, once a testing ground for cutting edge weaponry, is now a testing ground for Cultural Marxist social theories. The stability of the global economy seems to be based on Americans consuming things and the rest of the world making things, an obviously unsustainable system. The federally subsidized universities, apart from propagating insanity, leave most of their students with less promising futures than a welding apprenticeship would.
It is only natural that so many white men would conclude that “the state is the problem.” It speaks volumes about the US government’s pathetic performance that so many of its citizens cannot even conceive of a state that enables its citizens to have a better future than can be scraped out of the hidden valleys of northern Idaho. The US Government is so bad in their eyes, they cannot even conjure an imaginary state capable of worthwhile contributions to the society it serves.
However, when we coldly examine these libertarians, especially the patriot survivalists, we realize that they are making a virtue of white flight. They take white flight almost to its logical conclusion, beyond the suburbs but just before the final white family is run down by Soros-funded colored mobs.
Our enemies can only be exiled and brought to heel by a strong state. Our future as a people, a collective future that still gives enough leeway to the individual to allow genius to flourish, can only be guaranteed by a White Nationalist state. And of course, it is only a white state, not a soulless corporation or a mixed-race state, which will colonize space.
4. Not Restoring the Constitution
Above, Glenn Beck praises MLK’s “true conservative” values.
Patriots and libertarians, as well as quite a few middle class whites employed in the private sector, have concluded that a strict reading of the US constitution is all that is needed to set things right. The excesses of the Cultural Marxists are only possible through a loose reading of the constitution. The constitution did help a liberty-loving white nation’s rise to be the world’s greatest superpower. The constitution allowed whites with a diversity of faiths, political convictions, and professions, that could not be contained in a single European country, to work together to maintain the defense necessary for independence and the commercial system necessary for prosperity. The Bill of Rights gave individuals protections from tyranny not seen since antiquity, and perhaps unsurpassed in all history. This unprecedented liberty unleashed the ambitions of white men to conquer an entire continent in a single century. America still stands out as a land of opportunity to denizens of developing countries. When these people sneak into Europe it is to get welfare; when they sneak into America it is to work hard and make their fortune.
It is not hard to understand why so many white Americans believe that if the same recipe is used, the meal will taste the same. Unfortunately, ingredients matter. The constitution, as some of the Founders pointed out in the Federalist Papers, assumed a common culture and common morality. This cannot be willed back into existence. Furthermore, the constitution and the high trust, virtuous society that made it possible was a manifestation of white cultural traits. Restoring the constitution can be considered after a nice white country is reestablished (hopefully incorporating the lessons of America’s failed racial experiments). But it cannot be the first step towards restoring the liberty, prosperity, and order appreciated by the white founding stock of the US.
5. Not Pretending “The South Will Rise Again”
The American southeast, despite large rivers and some small mountain ranges, is a land without natural borders.
North is a direction; the South is a place, a culture, and a source of pride. It is no surprise that many descendants of the heroic soldiers of the South cherish the memory of their ancestors. This strain of Albion’s seed, the traditionalists, are far less culpable than their Northern cousins, the moralists, in allowing the United States to be subverted by the eternal enemy of our people. The culture distorters who control the media of the US have done all they could to discredit the Southerner, both the aristocratic and down-and-out archetypes. When these proud and demonized Southerners observe the recent evils of the Federal government noted above, the same Federal government that made war upon their ancestors, it is no surprise that many would dream of a renewed separatist struggle.
The Romantic in each of us can conclude that the South has everything it needs for such a struggle; the classicists, however, realize there is more to be desired. The South has the bulk of US mainland and retrievable deep sea oil. Most American refinery capacity and infrastructure is in the South. The South also has an incredibly long border with the rest of the US that does not benefit from serious geographical impediments to invasion. There is no “rump South” with defensible borders that can be retreated to, but there are plenty of mountain refuges where Southerners could make another last stand. There is not a single planner in the Pentagon who would look at this and accept a peaceful separation that would result in such a sovereign country to be placed in a newly created soft underbelly. National liberation struggles with imperial powers only succeed when there is an asymmetrical interest[2] in changing the status quo between the colonizer and the colonized.
Though the South is the most economically dynamic and is the fastest growing region, this is thanks to internal migration of highly educated whites and Asians who do not share a desire for Southern separatism. Furthermore, about 1 in 4 Southerners are Black. In the age of guerilla warfare and highly propagated small arms, this large a population will not accept leaving the US, which will make even a peaceful separation of the South impossible.
The struggle to preserve a future for our people will be an all or nothing struggle. The empire cannot allow for a separate peace, and it certainly won’t be based on reverence for a political economy that was dysgenic and anti-nationalist.
6. Not Repeating the Lie of “Judeo-Christian” Civilization
Victor Davis Hanson believes these people are co-founders of and equal partners in Western Civilization
After the Attacks of September 11th, as Americans looked for allies who could help make sense of radical Islam, the organized Jewish community stepped forward. If Jihadists were attacking both of us, we must have something in common. The sabbos goy, Victor Davis Hanson, explained to us that the foundations of Western Civilization were Athens, Rome, and Jerusalem. More recently, Gavin McInnes is attempting to redefine the Alt Right as “Western Cultural Chauvinism.” Under normal circumstances, an alignment of interests is the best foundation for an alliance. Unfortunately, there is nothing normal about Jewish cultural norms. When any element of the organized Jewish community is the counterparty in an agreement, like the fable of the frog and the scorpion, the compulsion towards betrayal, even against allies is irresistible for the Jew.
Unless they live in a handful of major cities, most Americans only know two Jews intimately, Moses and Seinfeld. In school, American history books start with the Pilgrims. In Church, Sunday school history lessons end in first-century Palestine. Most Americans lack the opportunity to be red-pilled through personal interactions with Jews and lack the historical/cultural formation to understand the long history of this indissoluble node and its parasitic relationship with Europe’s Third Estate.[3]
Leaving the history lessons aside, simply looking at the “Judeo-Christian” alliance of the last 15 years should make it abundantly clear that such an alliance is a non-starter and that our allegedly common civilization is not enough to ensure mutual concern. It requires just a small amount of political maturity to understand the one-two punch of the Jewish Left, which oversees our invasion and cultural demoralization, and the Jewish Right, which has created an environment of Christian genocide in the Levant, emboldened a brand of Jihadism more focused on attacking the West rather than Israel, and created the push factors of the so-called “refugee crisis.” If Jews are white, as a ruling elite that arose from within white Civilization, why are there no brakes on their material greed? The need for order and sustainability, which would be compelling to any organic elite that is linked to its subjects through bonds of race and civilization, was definitely not guiding the criminal banksters who knowingly crashed the global economy. While a handful of egregious crimes committed by Jews have been prosecuted, the Jewish parasitic elites who created the systemic bribery, theft, and destruction of that defines the European and American economies have not been brought to justice.
George Lincoln Rockwell, when describing the principles of civilization, stated: “Civilization is built because I am willing to give up something for my family, and the family is willing to give up something in order to have the town succeed, and the town is willing to give up something so that the state can be in business, and the state is willing to give up something so that the nation can succeed. Self-sacrifice is the first principle of civilization.” Whether we are looking at the degenerate popular media and culture, the rolls of soldiers lost in Iraq and Afghanistan, or the nearly nonexistent prosecutorial response to criminal Jewish banksters following the economic crisis, it is clear that the overwhelming contribution of the Jewish community to Western civilization is not as a foundational component but as a parasitic squatter that threatens catastrophic collapse.
This “not” may be the most important to enumerate. The most likely subversion of the Alt Right will come in the form of well-funded, well-organized philo-Semitic media outlets and 501(c)(4) advocacy organizations. The kosher media will be a partner in defining the Alt Right in the mind of the masses. Remember that the Tea Party was a genuine grass roots movement that largely grew as a continuation of the Ron Paul campaign. FreedomWorks was created by the Koch Brothers and funded by their fellow oligarchs to rein in this movement. They made very generous grants to local Tea Party groups as long as they agreed not to criticize neocon war-mongering, mass immigration, or the Federal Reserve. Within a year they were successful. Glenn Beck and the Zionist-bankrolled Pastor Hagee started national networks and put on large spectacles to divert energy of Tea Party sympathizers toward the neocon agenda. The 2010 midterm election was the last time Tea Party has had an impact on government. If we are not aware of this risk, our brief moment in the sun will be followed by a decade in the darkness.
7. Not Starting with Revisionism
Since we are not shying away from criticizing the role of Jews in destroying Western civilization, why not snap people out of their slumber by enumerating all the lies of kosher historiography and Jewish criminality? Creating a nice, white country is a 21st-century political challenge, not a 20th century historical debate. For some readers, exposure to Historical Revisionism was a major moment in their political awakening. Discovering a lie so big fills one with a missionary zeal to spread the truth. Attacking a metapolitical foundation for the current order seems like the linchpin that, once pulled, will destroy the entire psychological control mechanism put in place by the political and media elite.
Understand that in the life cycle of revolutionary movements, different types of people join at different stages. Far fewer people will have the ears to hear something that contradicts their beliefs, but they are concerned about the “kitchen table issues” that the kosher multicultural regime fails to address. For many new arrivals, revisionism may be a metaphorical advanced degree that they can shoot for once their prerequisites are finished, but an encounter with a wild-eyed revisionist trying to “wake them up” at their first real world meeting with Alt Rightists would send them packing. At the same time, it is clear that the sensibilities of millennials, on both sides of this issue, are different than that of their predecessors.
Many of our last minute supporters who will take us over the top may never have the interest or capacity to understand the complexities of Revisionism. But rest assured, after the revolution, there will be a “Mark Weber Chair of Modern History” at Harvard, and Eric Hunt will be an executive producer at the History Channel.
8. Not Diverted by the Battle of the Sexes
MGTOW practiced as it was in the Satya Yuga (Golden Age)
Our People are failing to reproduce at replacement levels in most of historically white countries; divorce and degeneracy are commonplace and celebrated, respectively. In school underqualified teachers prefer to force parents to drug young boys into submission rather than deal with the aggressive, energetic nature of these boys.[4] Young men fall prey to nonmarket strategies in the workplace, often blindsided by female and homosexual colleagues who outclass them in EQ when productivity and meritocracy is sandbagged by egalitarian Federal regulations and social sanctions that stigmatize the “privileged” Heterosexual white Males. Shockingly, 15% of men in their early 20s have not had a single sexual partner since turning 18, mostly “InCels” (Involuntary Celibates),[5] for other young men first dates have become easier than ever thanks to dating apps, but meaningful relationships are like a sip of water to Tantalus. College campuses are in the grip of a new post-Christian puritanism that decries “rape culture” and claims that all men are potential rapists who must be reined in, a rather Calvinist view of the masculine soul.
While many of the previously mentioned problems affect only a few, there is a universal character to these problems as all of us came from a union of a man and woman and all of us have a need for emotional companionship. These basics have been challenged in the past when societies have been decimated by famine or pandemic, or when peoples have been brutalized by war and oppression, but never have these basic needs been so threatened by a decadence that affects not just the idle rich, as in times past, but the entire society.
There are many in the Manosphere, who stay strictly within their own expertise (divorce lawyers, counselors, economists, fitness trainers, nutritionists, martial artists, etc.) and who make valuable contributions. There are many positive testimonies of well-meaning men who were told to “give [women] what [they say] they want and they’ll be happy” but through a pro-social application of lessons from the Manosphere have created healthier marriages, such as Daily Shoah contributor Hateful Heretic.[6]
MGTOW as it is practiced in the Kali Yuga (Dark Age)
There are essentially three groups which seek to reach “the logical conclusion” in their response to these social pathologies. Two of them are nihilists, Pick Up Artists (PUA) and Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW). The third, self-proclaimed traditionalists, seeks to adopt Satmar-style social norms and fertility levels in order to resolve the demographic crisis.
PUAs pumping and dumping women will never help us recreate a nice white country. Instead they have embraced the Brazilification of sexual norms and identity as a kind of protective shell against the coming pain of the Brazilification of our racial demographics. There have been quite a few MGTOWs in history deserving of respect, the Hindu Saddhus, Buddha and his Arahants, and the Desert Fathers come to mind. Unfortunately, the internet subculture of MGTOWs lack the many of their qualities. Like the PUAs, they are emotionally devastated by the social pathologies related to gender and sexuality that are so common in this age, but their risk aversion and poor social skills lead them to sequester themselves from any attempt at creating a loving family . . . sadly, for many of them, there is no model to follow from their personal lives and, if there was, they lack the finesse to understand the interpersonal dynamics that led to success.
The final group is the most sympathetic as they have not given up on the white race and/or Western civilization. However, there are three errors in their approach. Most importantly, when they reject the positive aspects of the contribution of white women to public life in Europe and America, they are abandoning a distinguishing characteristic of the white race. Also, every successful revolution and national liberation movement of the modern era so greatly benefitted from the active participation of women in every aspect of struggle (propaganda, logistics, political organizing, espionage, armed struggle, etc.) that they were indispensable. Finally, it assumes a zero-sum game between including women whose greatest ambition and aptitude is to raise a large family and including those women whose ambitions, aptitudes, age, and fertility guide them toward every other field known to man.
The American experience has led many in our movement to believe that the feminine soul is essentially anti-nationalist and anti-traditionalist. Restricting this rebuttal to a single counter-example, in France women’s suffrage did not come until 1945. It was actively opposed by the socialists and radicals of the Third Republic who feared that women would listen to the political advice of their Priests and would support Patriarchal leaders. In the Fifth Republic, when women started voting at the same rate as men, there was not a Left-wing government until 1981 (which was elected with only 39% of the female vote). Today, the National Front enjoys proportionally more support from women than from men. So, if there is a problem, it is not women or feminism but rather the American cultural expectations of women and American expressions of feminism.
If the problem is cultural and not biological, then perhaps we should look to the media for a culprit. The media is not notable for being in the hands of women; the media is notable for being 90% in the hands of 6 Jewish families plus Rupert Murdoch. Someone is standing in the way of our nice white country but it is not women . . . it is the organized Jewish community.
Conclusion
While articles like this have a certain impact on the thinking of a small number of people within the movement, ultimately, it is those who speak in poetry rather than prose who have the broadest impact. As RamzPaul stated, following the Bastille Day attack in Nice, “White Nationalism is about our need for a home, a home of our own.” All of these movements that the Alt Right is not, whether they are centuries old or are simply YouTube channels that have been around a couple years, they diagnose some of the problems of our civilizational and racial decline, but none of them have the whole story or the proper prognosis.
White People need living space separate from the other races to survive and thrive. Jews of all political stripes are a parasitic element that will stand in the way of that goal. Achieving these goals requires a broad movement that seeks total victory and the resulting peace and order will only be maintained by a strong state. Our historic religious commitments, enlightenment ideals, and family values will be reinterpreted through the lens of racial survival . . . we are free to keep what works and discard what doesn’t work well with this goal.
We are also free to maintain our commitments to these Dead Ends that lie outside the Alt Right, but we do so at the peril of securing the existence of our people and a future for white children. What could be more important than that?
Notes
1. Alain de Benoist has referred to immigrants as “the reserve army of capitalism” which have been unleashed upon the native working class.
2. Asymmetric Interest Theory developed out of Game Theory experiments. When one party views a point of negotiation as a priority and the other party views it as contingent on more important priorities being met, there is an asymmetry of interest. As a result, when the first party makes the second party’s highest priorities impossible to achieve without surrendering on first party’s priority, the first party is at an advantage.
3. The relationship between Jews and their European host populations varied by estate/caste, falling into essentially four categories of bilateral economic relationships. There was no economic, ideological, or governmental relationship between Jews and the clergy, with a handful of exceptional debates or investigations carried out with the Second Estate into Jews masquerading as Christians. The Second Estate had a largely positive relationship with Jews because they were guaranteed friendly rates to borrow money (a necessity in the long cycles between harvests, then as now), access to an international trade network, a source of intelligence, and the Medieval form of diplomatic back channels. The fixed, guaranteed interest rate was a loss leader, allowing access to black market lending to the Christian peasants, merchants, and artisans of the Third Estate. The fourth and worst bilateral relations began in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth where the nobles hired the Jews to act as tax farmers and mid-level government administrators over the Third Estate.
4. According to the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics, 14.1% of boys and 6.2% of girls aged 5-17 were diagnosed with ADHD between 2012-2014.
5. Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2016: “Sexual Inactivity During Young Adulthood Is More Common Among U.S. Millennials and iGen: Age, Period, and Cohort Effects on Having No Sexual Partners After Age 18.”
6. Fash the Nation – Week 51; 1h06m.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
20 comments
Brilliant piece, Mr. Le Brun.
Your work at Counter-Currents has been a true inspiration to me, and I widely share your interview on Entryism and your article on Planned Parenthood:
https://counter-currents.com/2014/10/counter-currents-radiogreg-johnson-interviews-patrick-lebrun-on-entryism/
https://counter-currents.com/2015/10/white-nationalists-need-planned-parenthood-not-the-pope/
I also wanted to thank Mr. Johnson for stepping up to the plate in the last several weeks and showing true leadership when it was most needed in the Alt Right, namely during the entire Milo-Gate affair.
Mr. Johnson’s appearance on Fash the Nation Week 58 and his discussion with Vox Day on Alt West vs. Alt Right were crucial in protecting the integrity of the Alt Right, in my opinion.
High-level representatives of both the Alt West and the Alt Right peacefully coming together, calmed the waters and prevented animosities, caused by Milo Yiannopoulos’ irresponsible and conniving behavior, to spiral out of control.
Much respect and gratitude to Mr. Day and Mr. Johnson for this important diplomatic effort to keep the two most important factions of the Dissident Right on friendly terms.
I also want to give credit to Andrew Anglin for countering Milo Yiannopoulos’ intrusion into and attempted co-option of the Alt Right movement. Even though, I don’t fully agree with all of Andrew’s methods, the harsh language and imagery he uses in his propaganda efforts, and his hypervigilance, I personally feel, that he and the Daily Stormer are a net-positive for the Alt Right movement, and I appreciate his efforts and highly respect and honor his personal sacrifices in the defense of White and Western Civilization.
Thank you, again, to everybody. This is a team/group effort.
I also wanted to thank Red Ice Radio and The Golden One for all their hard work in upholding high and authentic Alt Right standards. Their videos over the last several weeks were an indispensable quality control service, in my opinion, and have been protecting the now very valuable Alt Right brand and product.
Red Ice Live – An Alt-Right Response to Milo’s Interview on the Alt-Right
Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKGBWNGiGMU
Red Ice Live – Milo Yiannopoulos: Psychologically Profiled – All Flash, No Fash
Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJYosQAGyGg
The Alt-Right. The Jewish Question. Paul Joseph Watson.
Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHL59gEeRX4
Milo Yiannopoulos Confirmed Heretic. Misrepresents the Alt-Right in Spectacular Fashion
Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMWsMACBcxs
Red Ice Radio is actually the route I took into the Alt Right. I have been listening to Henrik Palmgren since circa 2006/2007.
If universal truth is rejected, then the white race has no “right” to exist at all. If there is no truth, then might makes right, and white people have no cause to complain about being raped, murdered, or genocided. If, on the other hand, the idea that a people has a right to maintain its existence is held to be a universal truth, then might does not make right, and whites have a coherent and acceptable code of ethics (i.e., no one should be raped, murdered, or genocided, whatever their race may be– a people has a right to maintain its identity).
I have made this point before, but I’ll make it again: if you really want to reject the notion that right and wrong have universal relevance, then to be consistent, you’d better stop complaining about how unfairly the Jews are treating you. If what you’re saying is true and universal morality is a sham, and the strong are meant to rule the weak, then given the current complexion of things, the Jews are the true master race, and non-Jewish whites are the untermensch. Also, blacks who rape and murder whites are just asserting their natural superiority, and victimized whites have no right to object that such behavior is unseemly, cruel and barbaric– cuz that’s just “slave morality.”
In other words, rejecting universal morality cuts your argument out from under you.
“I have made this point before, but I’ll make it again: if you really want to reject the notion that right and wrong have universal relevance, then to be consistent, you’d better stop complaining about how unfairly the Jews are treating you.”
Why should we “better stop complaining?” This is not a comprehensible assertion.
A superior boxer who, say, loses a boxing match because his sly opponent spiked his drink had better START complaining about being cheated against, not idiotically keep mute about losing the match because the opponent used underhanded tactics. And then, the superior boxer should pound his cheating opponent into the dust — and keep vigilant that his drink never be spiked again.
In fact, the problem is that we haven’t complained ENOUGH — we’ve just let ourselves be screwed and stupidly kept mute about it. In fact, we should (a) complain more, (b) get even, and (c) crush our enemies. I am not joking; I am deadly serious.
“If what you’re saying is true and universal morality is a sham, and the strong are meant to rule the weak, then given the current complexion of things, the Jews are the true master race, and non-Jewish whites are the untermensch.”
Again, this is not a comprehensible assertion. There’s nothing “master race” about putting one over on someone via sly conniving — except to a sly conniver. To a nobler people, OTOH, such underhanded ploys by one’s enemies are to be noted (with disgust at the finks who use them) and then the connivers prevented from ever succeeding via such ploys, ever again.
“Also, blacks who rape and murder whites are just asserting their natural superiority, and victimized whites have no right to object that such behavior is unseemly, cruel and barbaric– cuz that’s just “slave morality.”
Your latter assertion does not follow from the former. “Rape and murder” is no evidence of “natural superiority” — and it doesn’t require some Christian framework to realize this. And denouncing animalistic behavior is not an expression of “slave morality” — rather, permitting Untermenschen to perform these actions without complaining/condemning and punishing the perpetrators, THAT would be slave morality.
There’s nothing “master race” about putting one over on someone via sly conniving — except to a sly conniver.
If there is no right or wrong, then there is nothing evil about being conniving. If the strong have license to rule the weak, then the weak have no cause to complain. And if the Jews are ruling over you, then they are the strong and you are the weak, not the other way around.
Only by acknowledging right and wrong do you have cause to defend those who are being wantonly exploited or abused. Moral relativism undermines such a defense.
You chafe against “ignoble,” “conniving,” and “underhanded” tactics, but this is an appeal to morality, whereby the noble, forthright, and fair are more deserving due to their moral superiority, which CANNOT BE MAINTAINED unless one shuns moral relativism.
There is no such thing as the ” right ” to hold on to a piece of land, only the ” might ” to not have it taken away from you. Whatever you have, whether it is your money, your women or your land, there is always somebody who wants to take it from you. This is the way of man. This is a universal and timeless truth
Nationhood, peoplehood, is a bloody and gutsy thing.
Our enemies have no intention of playing fair. There will never be a seat at the rainbow table for White people. Our enemies have no intention of negotiating. For them there is nothing to negotiate. For them it is an all or nothing game. Only Whites play by the rules.
As you know well yourself Andy , the dice are loaded, the fight is fixed and the game is rigged.
The highest form of morality known to mankind is to discriminate in favour of those things which are closest to you–yourself, your family, your relations, your community, your culture, your nation , and your ethnic and racial group
” The tellers of Truth can inspire hatred against the tellers of Lies. just as the tellers of Lies can inspire violence against the tellers of Truth, but the Truth is the Truth nonetheless “
It is the fetish-like quality of Whites like you to assign “universals” of behavior and standards on to everyone; when in fact you are wrongfully projecting your specific biological-genetic predisposition to universals for you and your race group on to others; that is the problem.
The only reason Jews are in the positions they are in, is the fact that as Patrick Le Brun stated above, our OWN ETHNIC KIN ELITIES HAVE ALLIED WITH THEM AGAINST US… It is white elites, moral universalists like yourself, and intellectual dishonesty that has allowed this.
To give historical examples, whites maintained in the South prior to the Civil War where in some areas they were out numbered by as much as 10-20 to 1 dominance and control over blacks. How did they do this? Oh yea, then they had racial pride, self-consciousness, and self-assertion to maintain their (Whites) interests and ONLY their Biological-Cultural interests, and NEVER thought that blacks were in any way like them…
Prior to the adoption of Christianity, Europeans NEVER thought of non-Europeans as one with them, they NEVER applied their concepts of bio-self and cultural norms to outsiders, they new that the non-Europeans were NOT them and did not think like them. They therefore took healthy bio-assertive actions to maintain their interests… You are perverting Plato’s theory of the forms by saying: “there is a perfect morality out there” and if ALL just find and understand it than All will except it. That’s non-sense. That theory was only meant to apply to Europeans, their perfect ideas for THEM, and ONLY THEM, and their interests. Plato never cared about the non-European world because he knew they were not him and his kin.
Stop trying to universalize European thought to non-Europeans… This is a battle for survival do you think racial enemies can be reasoned with and shown the “error” of their ways? Of course not!!!
Do you think our racial enemies waste time with pseudo-clever rhetorical sophistry such as you have come up with?
Might does make right, and ONLY Whites are smart enough to believe BOGUS ideas like you purvey to go AGAINST their OWN biological self-interests…
“Might does make right” — Well, then stop bitchin’ about the white race being wiped out by those with superior might.
In response to Andy Nowicki:
Andy Nowicki
Posted October 8, 2016 at 2:22 pm | Permalink
“Might does make right” — Well, then stop bitchin’ about the white race being wiped out by those with superior might.
1. A pithy, dishonest response to say the least.
2. Did you read my article? I am not “bitching” as you put it. I totally understand why they degenerates are doing what they are doing.
3. It is the two front war that whites are fighting among their selves that is the problem. It is drivel and if this than that BOGUS arguments such as you purvey that enables the degenerate non-whites to flourish.
4. All whites need to do is DECIDE to WIN and look out for their own kin and this ends quite quickly…
5. You would be one of the first types of self-deceiving white universalist, pseud-intellectual, betas to be dispatched…
“If there is no right or wrong, then there is nothing evil about being conniving.”
It’s not that there is no right or wrong — just that there’s no “universal” right or wrong.
Systems of right and wrong are the ones that we create or select. There is a Christian right and wrong, a Classical right and wrong, a Nietzschean right or wrong, etc. (and obviously each of these is highly malleable and open to interpretation). Our goal, as White Nationalists / Alt Righters / what have you, should be to select/craft the moral system that is truest to our essential natures and enables us to thrive, while crushing our enemies.
“If the strong have license to rule the weak, then the weak have no cause to complain. And if the Jews are ruling over you, then they are the strong and you are the weak, not the other way around.”
Not so. First of all, “license” is your formulation, which implies some sort of permission from on high, and nothing of the sort exists. Things simply are what they are.
Second, let me reiterate the following point, because I may not have communicated it with sufficient emphasis the first time: Just because someone is ruling over someone else doesn’t make them strong, and just because someone is ruled by someone else, that doesn’t make them weak (even leaving aside the fact that such situations might represent but a temporary aberration from what preceded and what followed). Remember: Nietzsche rejected the social-Darwinist notion of “survival of the fittest,” precisely because he observed that, all too often, the weak gang up together to suppress the strong. In fact, one of Nietzsche’s core tenets is that “The strong must be protected from the weak.”
“Only by acknowledging right and wrong do you have cause to defend those who are being wantonly exploited or abused. Moral relativism undermines such a defense.”
Again, not so. Having a morality doesn’t demand that said morality be the Christian one, or a universal one. We can certainly have a morality that defines for us, for our own people, what is noble versus what is base, per our own character as a race (or even, our own character as an ethno-nation), and, based on that morality, reward those whom we judge deserving of reward and punish those whom we judge deserving of punishment. And we need not proselytize that morality to other peoples; in fact, we might well conclude, “This moral code suits us, but would be pearls-before-swine vis-a-vis other peoples.”
“It’s not that there is no right or wrong — just that there’s no “universal” right or wrong.”
Then don’t complain or object when white people decide to embrace multiculturalism and demographic displacement… there is no ‘universal” right or wrong, so your choice to be pro-white is no better than their choice to be anti-white.
The highest morality is survival. If an individual, nation, or race doesn’t value itself above others it can hardly expect other groups with whom it is competing to nobly dispense equal treatment!
My mother had a bit of wisdom relating to ‘fairness’, whenever I as a young boy made a complaint that something wasn’t ‘fair’, she would reply, “neither is a nigger’s bum”. In other words, get over it and start working to overcome that particular obstacle in life.
The purpose of complaining about Jews isnt to “get justice”. It is expose the Jews to white people. Right to exist is ridiculous. It is against laws of nature. There is no such thing as right to exist in nature. You either are strong enough to exist or you perish. But there is also a reason why Alt-right rejects right to exist. The average alt-right warrior gets the information he needs. But leaders, they plan ahead. And once we do win they have no plans of granting the “right to exist” to those that tried to genocide us.
“if you really want to reject the notion that right and wrong have universal relevance, then to be consistent, you’d better stop complaining about how unfairly the Jews are treating you.”
This is laughable. All this time I thought that Jews and their Ethno state of Israel were our “greatest Allies!” It doesn’t take an act of genius or strength, to make pacts in bad faith.
I disagree on point #7 (revisionism). The “wild-eyed revisionists” have excellent arguments, some of them not even related to history.
For example, how “free speech” – the holiest cow in the crusade to “make the world safe for democracy” – is abandoned when it comes to “negate” what Jews affirm.
In most European countries doubting in the 6 million puts you in jail for years (5 years in Germany). In France you cannot even express criticism of the Nuremberg trials – a law signed by a communist (Gayssot) and a Jew (Fabius).
How revisionists and their publications are treated in ultra-liberal western democracies is an excellent showcase of Jewish hypocrisy, without any of the “complexities” Patrick fears so much. We should not neglect these arguments.
By the way, I was expecting point #9: Not doubting in 9/11 … the Alt-Right could be accused of supporting conspiracacy theories.
Ole miss rebels? Kek you mean the black bears
With respect, in regards to point 5, the position that the South’s economy is in part bound to transplants who feel no attachment to local identity and seek only to profit and remake it in their image, could very well apply to the West in general. In the end, what matters more; money or home? Furthermore, how much of this urbanized hipster economy is sustainable longterm?
The South is still very much a distinct region, as expressed from military enlistment rates to voter turn-out for Trump, that reflect real-word identities and assets that would make it a valuable faction for the Alt-Right to cultivate rather than a phenomenon seen as a mere “dead-end.” Identity (like love and loyalty) only scales so high; eventually it fragments along the lines of language, ethnicity, and worldview. Better to encourage functional, authentic, local identities and strongholds where people live and die, and to adapt and coordinate as necessary.
I would like wholeheartedly concur with Nestor, Dan O’Connor, Jim, German Warrior, and Some Guys comments, and add my own.
It appears that the alt-right is fracturing into two distinct camps, which will be important in the long run. On the one hand, we have a soft alt-right camp that believes in normalizing the WN message into some sort of vague pro modernity, pro homosexual, judeophile hand-wringing over white dispossession. The hard alt-right camp is the polar opposite, and is rapidly coming to resemble Weimar era German patriots. (as an aside, check out Chapter 5 of Kevin MacDonald’s Separation and Its Discontents, available here as a downloadable pdf -> http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/saidchap5.pdf )
Once the National Socialists of Germany understood this about the jewish real-world application of “universal morality”, and jews realized it, then global jewry mobilized all of their slaves and their hosts to destroy this Aryan threat to their global domination. Mama Merkel and the EU continue this program of destruction and extermination to this day.
Reiterating what has been said by others, I would argue that we firmly believe that only white non-jews, aka us, the Aryans, can conceive of “universal truths”. The only truth the jews believe in is that they are “the Chosen” and all goyim are beneath them, and their pets (at least in America and Europe, which is to say Africans and Moslems) lack the intellect and empathy to understand or even conceive of a “universal truth”. Does a dog understand in some universal truth that will stop it from attacking other dogs? No, it must be taught discipline and control.
“If universal truth is rejected, then the white race has no “right” to exist at all.”
You are absolutely correct, the white race has no “right” to exist based on your wishful thinking. Like it or not, and I know this is hard for most Americans to accept, but all rights come from might. If we are to secure the existence of our people and a future for white children, this will only come about through the force of arms and the ability to impose our will on the other races. We would all hope for a peaceful separation, but unfortunately, freeing ourselves from the jew and their pets means that we must be cut them off from the tit of our largesse. I do not think that they will go peacefully or quietly.
“If there is no truth, then might makes right, and white people have no cause to complain about being raped, murdered, or genocided. If, on the other hand, the idea that a people has a right to maintain its existence is held to be a universal truth, then might does not make right, and whites have a coherent and acceptable code of ethics (i.e., no one should be raped, murdered, or genocided, whatever their race may be– a people has a right to maintain its identity).”
And who or what would you appeal to… the community of nations, humanity, the super jew in the sky, future generations? A people will stop being genocided when they fight back, or flee to safer environs, or secure the patronage of more powerful allies who will intervene on their behalf.
“I have made this point before, but I’ll make it again: if you really want to reject the notion that right and wrong have universal relevance, then to be consistent, you’d better stop complaining about how unfairly the Jews are treating you. If what you’re saying is true and universal morality is a sham, and the strong are meant to rule the weak, then given the current complexion of things, the Jews are the true master race, and non-Jewish whites are the untermensch.”
The jews are not strong, they are just very good (dare I say evolved) at being parasites. The jews only have power because they have attached themselves to our ruling goyim elite.
“the strong are meant to rule the weak”
Which is what our ancestors did, not too long ago!
“Also, blacks who rape and murder whites are just asserting their natural superiority, and victimized whites have no right to object that such behavior is unseemly, cruel and barbaric– cuz that’s just “slave morality.”
Blacks have no natural superiority other than an unfortunate tendency towards physical violence and low impulse control. The answer to their criminality is summary mob violence and communal reprisals. White Americans need to stop concerning themselves with worry over the “slave morality” or the feelings of black people, and re-learn what it means to be The Master and The Overseers, both of their nation and their destiny.
Good article. I agree with most of them. All of them to a degree. Nothing annoys me more than the “muh free market” cultist who think jewish capitalism is the answer to all of our problems. Not even religious fundamentalists are that annoying. You’ll notice too that it’s usually conservative jews who push this free market crap from the top down. (((Ayn Rand))) and (((Milton Friedman))) just to name two.
To get back to the article…
Question: how do radical feminists, black militants, third world invaders and Muslim extremists operate as a coalition when their goals appear to be diametrically opposed? How do feminists form alliances with Muslims when the former advocate equality between the sexes while the latter keep women subjugated and sometimes engage in mass rape and sexual slavery? How does black power jibe with third worlders who ethnically cleanse American inner city neighborhoods via gang violence?
Answer: because these groups understand…
(1) the common enemy (i.e., White mostly Christian males); and
(2) their common goal (i.e., the seizure of power).
Look at point number (2). By joining in a common struggle, these groups get: special status as “victims;” affirmative action; university “studies” departments; moneys from corporations and bureaucracies; special protection when it comes to hatecrimes; territory carved out in banlieues and campuses (“safe spaces,” No-Go Sharia Zones); and just about any amount of their mayhem covered up by government, academia and media (Rotherham, Ferguson Era rioting, farm attacks in South Africa, etc., etc.).
No one Left-coalition group could attain all of this on its own, or at least not very much. But by forming a common front and engaging in a common struggle they have become the System on campus, in the media, through much of the bureaucracy and even into the corporate power structure.
Gender equality, multicultism, black lives mattering, “welcome refugees,” — these are all tactics. Tactics to be exploited and discarded as the strategic situation fits. Advocate radical feminism to undercut traditional male “roles” among White men; then dump the gender equity to unleash Muslim “refugees” as muscle in the streets of Malmo, Paris, Brussels and Calais. Make a production of bringing in the Post-Racial Era; then agitate blacks into urban guerrilla warfare against White people from Milwaukee to Charlotte and points west. In the 1990s the Left took it to the streets to protest globalization of the work force; in the 2010s, the Left takes it to the street in support of global “immigrants” to bring down the White working class, quicker than one can chant “Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.”
The Left understands it’s a matter of tactics.
In all these struggles, White people are psychologically disarmed, progressively disenfranchised and sometimes physically displaced. The power of the Left grows, from the streets to the highest government offices. If it served its strategic goals, the Left would throw full support behind the most rapacious of capitalists and aggressive of warmongers.
Think I am using hyperbole? Consider how Hillary Clinton can rally both Wall Street financiers and Neo-Con jingoists behind her campaign with scarcely a progressive eyelash batted. This might seem incomprehensible if one tried to understand Leftist politics in terms of stated goals (equality, peace, social democracy). But from the Machiavellian perspective it all fits together nicely (pace Burnham). Their goal is power, the tactics are the path to it.
My point here is that the Alt-Right has to face a vital strategic decision: to proceed according to a narrow ideological purity; or to form a coalition of groups which are fighting to overturn the current System.
Both alternatives have their arguments.
Some of the groups listed in the article really are beyond hopeless as Mr Le Brun rightly notes. They do not belong in the Alt-Right. Some of the other groups would make useful allies. Some of them have valuable experience in taking on the System, and have even staked out organizational territory in the real world. We have to distinguish between strategic goals and the tactics employed to attain them.
On the micro-level, a coalition of campus Alt-Right groups might agitate for and establish White Studies and Men’s Rights departments while using protest tactics to defeat the common foe, i.e., cultural marxist administrations. On the macro-level, one possible future is the reorganization of North America into a White ethnostate formed from Canada and much of the current USA, allied with a separate country set up among several states adhering to Southern Nationalism; there might even be room for a Libertarian Free State somewhere in New England. Together, they could take on any number of foes.
There’s a common enemy in the current System. And there’s a common goal in gaining power to build on great visions. It’s a matter of determining the tactics to get there.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment