More like ZOG Emperor
1,437 words
In 2016, 2020, and 2024, I was one of tens of millions of Americans who voted for Donald Trump to put America First and Make America Great Again. But Trump really isn’t working for America. We have eloquent proof of that just this week with Trump’s simultaneous retreat from Minneapolis and advance on Iran.
No matter how you conceive of the United States—as a white man’s country, or as a multiracial society held together by “values” and “dreams”—having borders is pro-American. The Biden administration allowed some 20 million illegal migrants to enter the United States, joining tens of millions who were already here. Enough is enough. America simply will not exist unless all these people are removed. It was possible for them to come here. So of course it is possible to send them back. We simply need to muster up the will.
But Donald Trump lacks that will. He has done good things to prevent new immigrants and refugees from entering America. But he doesn’t have the will to remove the tens of millions who are already here. I’ve lost track of the number of times he has sold out to the cheap labor lobby.
But at least we were going to get rid of the really “bad hombres,” right? Nope, Trump has all but capitulated to the liberal insurrection in Minneapolis. Thus on February 4, border czar Tom Homan announced that 700 federal agents and officers would be immediately withdrawn from Minnesota (leaving about 2,000 in the state).
Instead of kicking in the doors of migrants with gang tattoos who are wanted for a litany of heinous crimes, Trump will be satisfied merely with picking through people who have been already arrested. The “worst of the worst” will remain free to prey upon American citizens.
Trump explained: “I learned that, uh [great confidence there] that maybe we can use a little bit of a softer touch. But you still have to be tough. There are criminals. We’re dealing with really hard criminals.” Trump isn’t just all talk and no action. He’s all double talk and no action.
How does he plan on doing that, exactly? There are indeed softer ways of conducting mass deportations, which ironically might be more effective than going door to door. These include making E-Verify (which is free) mandatory for employers, taxing remittances, barring people on welfare from sending money abroad, and enacting a federal version of California’s Prop 187 which would deny non-emergency social services to illegals. And most importantly, Trump could prosecute employers (aka his oligarch friends) who knowingly or recklessly hire illegals.
But Trump has shown no interest whatsoever in enacting these policies. This is despite the fact that the Homeland Institute has found high support for many of these “softer” policies (see here and here). But Donald Trump isn’t working for the American people. He’s working for his fellow oligarchs, who don’t want mass deportations at all, because there’s too much money to be made by destroying the American middle class.
But “softer” remigration policies may not work for the “worst of the worst,” who are now showcased like captured Pokémon on the DHS website. Somebody is going to have to kick in their doors. Otherwise, they will remain at large, victimizing Americans until the police arrest them. Then ICE will swoop in and declare victory.
Cucking on deportations isn’t just breaking a key campaign promise. It’s also dangerous. Like failing to conduct reprisals after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, failing to tame liberal strongholds will only encourage more Leftist violence. Why would they stop, when violence clearly works? The blood of future victims of Leftist violence is as much on Trump’s hands as antifa’s.
Despite retreating from Minneapolis, Trump is posturing like a triumphant conqueror. He plans to build a triumphal arch in Washington DC that will be 250 feet high, making it bigger than the Arc de Triomphe in Paris. This is supposedly to celebrate America’s 250th birthday, but it’s really about celebrating Trump’s ego.
America is a dying empire. But that seldom encourages realism and restraint. Indeed, when an empire is in decline, its leaders might launch wars thinking “It’s now or never.”
That’s clearly how the leaders of the Israeli regime are thinking. Israel’s leaders know that US support will die with the Boomers. Younger generations are less supportive due to the Gaza Genocide and the ongoing Epstein Affair. So Israel has every incentive to give America one last squeeze while they still can, and Zion Don is their man.
Just last year, Israel tried to drag America into a war with Iran. Thankfully, the Twelve Day War was just that brief. Israel took a surprising beating despite their initial advantage from a surprise drone attack launched from within Iran’s borders. Trump dropped some bombs, declared victory, and went home.
Unfortunately, last December, Trump blundered back onto the road to war with Iran.
In late December, Iran’s currency, the rial, collapsed to a record low, sparking protests in Tehran, initially by merchants and shopkeepers. As the demonstrations spread nationwide, their focus widened from economic grievances to calls for regime change. The Iranian government responded with an internet blackout and a violent crackdown by security forces.
Trump—who recently caved before much less violent protests in Minneapolis—stoked tensions in Iran: “Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING – TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!!” and “HELP IS ON ITS WAY.” Then, as on January 6, 2021, he did nothing and left the protesters to their fates.
When the government duly rounded up the protestors—some of them foreign agitators and terrorists—Trump threatened to attack Iran if the government executed any of them. Then he claimed that Iran had relented due to his threats. If so, that was a big mistake.
Trump also imposed 25% tariffs on countries trading with Iran and deployed naval forces—the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier group—to the area as a threat.
Frankly, Iran has the cards here. Iran threatened to retaliate against any neighboring country from which the US attacks it, and these threats are being taken seriously. The entire region is counseling peace because they know that Iran can cause enormous damage to oil and natural gas facilities, power plants, airports, and harbors, throwing their economies into chaos and perhaps sparking political unrest.
The USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Group in the Arabian Sea
Interestingly, even the Israelis have asked Trump to postpone attacking Iran until more US assets arrive in the region because they don’t have the ability to defend themselves from Iranian retaliation. Basically, that means that the US is unable to defend them, after having exhausted American weapons stockpiles during the Twelve Day War. These stockpiles may take years to replenish.
Iran turned the “Art of the Deal” against Trump and threatened to walk out of today’s negotiations if they weren’t held in Oman instead of Turkey and if the US tried to insert additional topics like ballistic missiles instead of sticking to Iran’s nuclear program.
Why, then, are we threatening war against a country that is much larger, more populous, and more advanced than Iraq? A full-blown war against Iran would cost far more lives and money than America’s regime-change wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. No sane and sober servant of the American people would contemplate such a war. Iran is not a threat to the United States or Europe.
If Trump were working for American interests, he would be focused on the home front: primarily immigration and the economy.
If Trump wanted to play geopolitical chess for American security interests, he would be focused on a genuine geopolitical rival: China.
If even some Israelis feel threatened by this, then Trump can’t even be accused of the standard treason of the entire American government, namely putting Israel first.
So why are we here?
It goes back to 2017, when Trump pulled out of the Obama administration’s agreement with Iran about halting nuclear weapons development. Trump has a deep rivalry with Obama and a strong need to one-up him. Thus he ran on the claim that Obama’s Iran deal was “terrible.” The usual suspects, of course, rejoiced, hoping that this could lead to war between the US and Iran. But now the main thing sustaining this is Trump’s ego.
Let’s hope that Trump invents another face-saving dodge, as with Greenland. After nine years of suspense and several weeks of saber-rattling in Gulf, it would be just like Trump to arrive at the status quo 2017 and proclaim it a great victory. Hell, if it keeps us out of war, we should even give him a victory parade beneath a pasteboard mockup of his 250-foot Arc de Trump.
51 comments
President Trump reversed himself on the Epstein files, called Marjorie Taylor Greene Marjorie Traitor Greene, and drove her out of office. He is also trying to destroy Thomas Massie.
If you stand loyally for everything Donald Trump said he stood for he calls you a traitor and does his best to destroy you politically.
It’s not our job to cover up the Epstein cabal, even if that was possible, and it’s not possible.
It’s also not the job of pro-Whites to win for President Trump a result in the mid-term elections that Trump’s own retreats and failures are putting out of reach.
Pollster Rich Baris delivers Trump’s political obituary and pre-emptive autopsy. Judicious use of a compressor and the volume control recommended – there’s a lot of furious shouting!
https://rumble.com/v75cgey-why-trumps-in-danger-of-falling-into-the-30s-between-the-numbers.html
It’s never too early to adopt the brace position…
If we follow the puck, other existential issues aside, most of all I worry about all internet platforms big and small in the aftermath of the present delusion/apathy/contempt of the administration.
“…several weeks of saber-rattling in Gulf…”
Persian Gulf, to be autistically accurate. Plus they are manoeuvring in the Arabian Sea, not the Gulf, which would have greater implications.
“Trump threatened to attack Iran if the government executed any of them. Then he claimed that Iran had relented due to his threats. If so, that was a big mistake.”
Hardly, considering the thousands they killed this time, despite Trump’s threats.
It is ruinous to tolerate within your borders an army of traitors that you dare not kill because they are in league with external enemies that constantly threaten to attack you and sometimes do. We know where that situation leads and it leads to the fate of the Arab Republic of Syria.
By ancient custom and the laws of war traitors and spies are entitled to no consideration.
Letting active and violent traitors and spies live is weakness, and weakness is dangerous when Israel and its mighty golem are out to destroy you.
Many ordinary Iranians would argue that it is the supporters of the regime who are the real traitors. Wanting an end to the corrupt and incompetent clergy who has looted the country and its natural resources to the point that the future of the once rich country risks being impoverished like Somalia or Afghanistan. Iran is truly a complex case…
Team Jew destroyed Libya, destroyed Syria, and is trying to destroy Iran. That’s what the Mossad and CIA agents want, that are walking beside their Iranian pawns: not anti-corruption reforms but national and racial annihilation for their non-Jewish victims. The people will be destroyed, the race will be destroyed, the Jewish state will rule as it rules in Gaza, and the morality of the rulers will be that of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. That is what we Whites are up against and that is what all those targeted by the Jews are up against.
Team Jew is bad. The Great Satan and the Little Satan are bad. ZOG, the Zionist Occupation Government of the United States of America (and the ruling force of the West in general) is bad.
Muslim clergy are not good people and I do not want them in White countries but they are not the main enemy.
I acknowledge what you are saying about the Jews. Let’s hope there won’t be a war with Iran. Either way, the Iranian people are affected the most.
Greg what are your favorite news channels (Telegram, X, substacks, websites etc) for staying up to date on things relating to geopolitics, for example the Iran situation. If you’d rather not say thats fine. Keen to hear from other Counter Currents readers too.
UK Column, The Duran (leans pro-Russia), Myth of the 20th Century (long-form podcasts). I also rather like Nima Alkhorshid. For nationalist economics, Oren Cass’s American Compass.
I follow Matt Walsh, Ramzpaul, and Tucker Carlson. Their coverage of the recent Epstein file-dump was useful and enlightening. They oppose war against Iran.
Tucker’s January 22nd monologue on Minneapolis and the Great Replacement was one of the best things I’ve ever heard. I was surprised it didn’t get more attention here, especially as it came three days after his interview of Peter Brimelow.
Do you have a link? I hope he accepts Kevin DeAnna’s challenge to have Jared Taylor on.
I hadn’t seen it either but I tracked it down:
https://tuckercarlson.com/live-show-jan-21-2026
Anon: February 7, 2026 Greg what are your favorite news channels (Telegram, X, substacks, websites etc) for staying up to date on things relating to geopolitics, for example the Iran situation… Keen to hear from other Counter Currents readers too.
—
I don’t participate on social media “news channels” at all myself (unless C-C is a social medium). From what I can gather Russia restricts Telegram; India and other countries also restrict Internet use. Iran is loosening restrictions after shutting down the Internet there recently.
Who’s to say that Internet access will not be restricted in America at some point by JOG and Big Tech?. Then what?
We can control only that which we can control locally: ourselves, our family and our community. Geopolitics like Iran, Ukraine, etc. are beyond our control — not to mention ICE shenanigans and the whereabouts of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie. Why is she the top story?
It will do American Whites well to see Iran’s recent history from its point of view: 47 years of resistance – Tehran Times
—
47 years of resistance
By Faramarz Kouhpayeh
February 9, 2026 – 21:44
Iran’s revolution continues to thrive despite decades of plots and pressure by US
TEHRAN – In November 1979, only months after the Islamic Republic was formally established through a national referendum in which Iranians overwhelmingly voted to reshape their political system, Imam Khomeini addressed a crowd in the city of Qom.
The revolution had just dismantled the Pahlavi monarchy, toppling a shah widely viewed across the world as one of Washington’s most reliable lackeys in West Asia. The question of how the new Iran would deal with the United States loomed large, and Imam Khomeini did not equivocate.
“They [America and its agents] will plot against us,” he warned. “But they will not be able to do anything.”
Nearly five decades later, those remarks read less like revolutionary bravado and more like a blunt outline of what followed. For 47 years, successive U.S. administrations—Democratic and Republican alike—have pursued policies aimed at weakening, containing, or undoing the Islamic Republic. There has been no real pause, no lasting reassessment, and no acceptance of Iran’s insistence on charting and maintaining an independent course.
The pressure has come in many forms. In the 1980s, Iran endured an eight-year war launched by Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, a conflict that was in reality, a U.S.-backed proxy war that cost hundreds of thousands of lives. In the decades since, waves of sanctions have followed, measures designed not simply to alter specific policies but to exhaust an entire society. More recently, the confrontation has included direct military clashes, a brief but intense 12-day war, cyberattacks, assassinations of Iranian scientists and generals, and a steady stream of covert operations.
Alongside military and economic pressure, Washington has repeatedly sought to engineer political change from within. From coup attempts to efforts at exploiting economic hardship and social grievances, the underlying objective has remained consistent: either force Iran into strategic submission or replace the Islamic Republic altogether. None of it has produced the desired outcome. Iran has been damaged, sanctioned, and relentlessly vilified in much of the Western media—but it has not collapsed, surrendered, or abandoned its core principles.
That endurance is not accidental. It draws on a long historical memory shaped by repeated foreign intervention, from imperial Russia and Britain to the United States in the twentieth century. For many Iranians, the 1953 CIA-backed coup against Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh remains a formative lesson. The lesson is that dependence invites domination, and sovereignty, once lost, is painfully difficult to reclaim.
Every year on February 11, Iranians mark the anniversary of the Islamic Revolution by taking to the streets across the country. These gatherings are more than ritual. They function as a public reaffirmation of a decision made in 1979 and tested ever since. The crowds are not monolithic; Iran, like any society, contains deep political disagreements, economic frustrations, and competing visions for the future. Still, the central message of the anniversary has remained remarkably consistent: independence is not negotiable.
When Iranians take to the streets again this Wednesday, it will serve as another reminder—especially to Washington—that decades of pressure have failed to produce submission. The slogans may change, the faces may be younger, but the underlying sentiment endures. Iran has been bruised and strained, yet it remains standing, wary of foreign dictates and resistant to being reshaped from abroad.
As one of the world’s oldest civilizations, with a modern history repeatedly scarred by outside interference, Iran’s insistence on sovereignty is not an abstraction. It is lived experience. The Islamic Republic was born out of that history and continues to draw legitimacy from it. For many Iranians, the struggle has never been about perfection or unanimity, but about preserving the right to decide their own future.
In that sense, Imam Khomeini’s words in Qom were not simply a prediction of American failure. They were an expression of confidence in a society that had already made a fundamental choice: that independence, once reclaimed, is worth defending—no matter the cost.
I was surprised to hear that Israel did not support the the war against Iraq, fearing regional destabilization. Perhaps the Trotskyites have a diverging agenda?
They are more afraid of another pasting by Iran’s hypersonic missiles.
The US spent tens of billions on trying to intercept them. Apparently, our stockpiles are so exhausted it may take years to replenish them. Let’s hope the US doesn’t need them for defending America!
Just the normal treason out of Washington.
I think that’s right, but the Jewish state should be making a different calculation.
The Epstein files have made it clearer than ever that America acts not at its own direction but at the direction of Jewish masters that hate the goyim. Meanwhile the Gaza Genocide has made Israel less popular than ever with young Americans. Meanwhile President Trump is demoralizing his own supporters in a variety of ways.
If President Trump commits to war on Iran at this time the mid-term election result could be so bad for him that there would not be a political base to sustain the war.
If America starts a war on Iran and nuns away, Iran will have won and there will be a new strong horse in the Middle East.
My fear is that if Trump started the war, the Jewish power structure in both parties would ensure that it is immediately bipartisan and thus immune to repudiation by changing the party in power. Trump would be the scapegoat for starting it, and the Democrats would continue it, to whatever disastrous end, blathering about human rights all the while, and Trump would absolve them of blame.
Sneaky Trotcons
Great article!
Where now are the horse and the rider? Where is the horn that was blowing?
Where is the helm and the hauberk, and the bright hair flowing?
Where is the harp on the harpstring, and the red fire glowing?
Where is the spring and the harvest and the tall corn growing?
They have passed like rain on the mountain, like a wind in the meadow;
The days have gone down in the West behind the hills into shadow.
Who shall gather the smoke of the deadwood burning,
Or behold the flowing years from the Sea returning?
J. R. R. Tolkien
Cogent analysis from Greg Johnson. I agreed with every word. Trump has been a tremendous disappointment.
I can’t understand why in that fairly recent FOX interview with Laura Ingraham, Trump claimed it was a good idea to let in thousands of Chinese international students.
Some are saying Trump’s health is going down fast. He does come across as cranky and tired.
I think very soon Iran will want the war if Trump keeps on escalating right up until the line. The Iran-Iraq war, and the Shia defence of their faith against the Ba’athists during that time, became a legendary legitimization for their theocratic regime after a shaky revolution. The same way World War II legitimized Stalin after the shaky reputation he had following the failures of collectivization. Or Putin bizarrely having his rule galvanized and strengthened after the war in Ukraine launched.
If the Iranian threat calculation shifts to believing they can survive a messy conflict and just experience traumatic bombing without a full occupation, and that their own people will hug them closer because of it, they’ll go for it. There’s liberal influences seeping through the Gulf states and Saudis, and that must make the Iranian theocrat elites a bit iffy about what a thaw in relations could entail. I seen a clip of a Halloween celebration in Saudi Arabia last year and it’s clear that the Islamism there is in terminal decline. A lot of their Arab elites are discreetly embarrassed about the yokel poor Arabs in places like Egypt, and actually prefer the Israelis for being developed and sophisticated like them.
But the bigger reason to get rid of Trump is his ego is so fragile that everyone has a Trump card over him. He’s effectively vulnerable to a form of blackmail by every world power that knows he cares about being perceived as powerful more than anything else, and that makes America vulnerable. If someone finds a way of making him look like a chicken, Trump does the Marty McFly move of being dragged into an unwinnable fight. If Iran does decide to want a war, it’d be effortless for them to goad Trump into a conflict, even if Trump himself doesn’t want it.
The Iranians should know that the US always betrays its “Allies” and never fulfills ist promises. Russians and another POWs in 1945-46; Eastern Europeans in 1946-1947, Chinese in 1948-1949, Cubans in 1961, South Vietnamese in 1975, Kurds since 1991, and many anothers can confirm this.
Trump did one up the Obama’s. He posted a hilarious meme portraying the two as monkeys.
This article is unnecessarily downbeat.
Minnesota should be considered a rogue state along the lines of Saudi Arabia in that it exports the negatives of its state religion. In Minnesota, the national church is Negro Worship.
The George Floyd riots were a crusade by adherents of that faith.
A counter-campaign is needed to bring about regime change In Minnesota. It will not be easy. The first battle was fought and now we realize that Minnesota’s most powerful weapons are leftists mattoids and mean liberal women in their 40s and 50s.
Meanwhile, Trump had to avoid a government shutdown and shift tactics.
This is a long way to say keep fighting with the goals of pulling down the temples of Negro Worship and shifting the political landscape in Minnesota in mind.
Iran has been a problem for as long as I can remember. There won’t be an election on our end that will change the overall situation. Just don’t do anything to help modern “Israel.”
I always rooted for Rand Paul over Trump. I got on the Trump Train in 2016 and it was very easy to sympathize with him due to the rotten way he was treated and lied about by the system. His first term was good, but hamstrung, and I was hoping the 2nd term would be an improved version of his first. However, I felt no joy when he won, and I entered 2025 with a sense of trepidation, as if this wasn’t the victory many were saying it was. Lo and behold my hunch was true. I am now back to supporting principled politicians, Massie in this case, who has begun outranking Rand Paul in my estimation. What an intrepid and principled character. It certainly won’t be Thiel-creature JD “Vance” Bowman-Hamel-Chilukuri who gets my support.
I am grateful to Thomas Massie and Margorie Taylor Greene for their efforts at forcing out many of the Epstein files. And for their opposition to Israel’s genocide in Gaza and the West Bank. And for their opposition to war against Iran. Trump and the Jews hate them for that.
I always liked Obama’s peace deal with Iran, the 2015 “Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action” (JCPOA), negotiated by John Kerry. It solved the problem. Then Trump revived it and made it worse.
I hope that by some miracle we can avoid a new war in the Middle East. Instead, Trump should focus on the civil war at home. And he should side with the White race, not with the Jews.
Amen to that.
But if President Trump persists in going pro-Jew and antiwhite, full foreign policy and very little domestic focus by comparison with what is needed, it’s not our job to attempt to save him by lying about how badly he is doing.
We have the truth on our side and we’re going to stick to it. That’s our best advantage. We’re not going to abandon it in some futile attempt to save a Zionist who is choosing his own political fate. (And calling the people who try to save him things like Marjorie Traitor Greene.) Zion Don can walk that road to Hell all on his own.
“Interestingly, even the Israelis have asked Trump to postpone attacking Iran until more US assets arrive in the region because they don’t have the ability to defend themselves from Iranian retaliation.”
It’s interesting to note that the US, despite its size and military spending, cannot easily overwhelm a country like Iran. That’s because projecting power over continents – as the US does with its aircraft carrier groups – is extremely costly, and the US cannot concentrate all its assets on one region, as that would give the Chinese and the Russians opportunities.
The US has 11 aircraft carriers, but 4 of those aren’t ready (being decommissioned, overhauled, undergoing maintainance etc), and the 7 active ones are arrayed as such:
— one for each coast, basically
— three for the three coast-adjacent seas (one in eastern Pacific, one in Atlantic, one in Caribbean)
— one in East Asia (-> Taiwan situation)
— one in the Indian Ocean (-> Mideast situation)
In other words, it’s not realistic that the US could use 4 whole aircraft carrier groups on Iran at any moment, and one carrier getting damaged already weakens US strategic capability considerably.
Darryl Cooper, who worked as an engineer on ballistic missile defense systems (!), explained how all the missiles carried by one aircraft carrier group aren’t really much compared to a country like Iran. Only a targeted strike against the leadership etc is possible, but not fighting a full-fledged war.
Given that the US simply lacks the war economy (not to mention the popular will) needed to wear down a country like Iran like it did with the Axis nations in WWII (or even like it attempted to do in Vietnam decades later), it’s clear that a decapitation strike or a co-ordinated action with opposition groups within Iran are the goal. But didn’t the US just burn those assets with those protests? And didn’t the Israelis burn their assets in Iran last June? What were the masterminds in the White House (or in Tel Aviv) thinking, starting a regime change operation before enough US assets were even in the region?
This looks like strategic miscalculation or stupidity to me.
This is a very good point.
I think Israel’s plan is to get something going, then by hook or by crook to drag Uncle Sam in to do the dirty work. That mentality doesn’t really encourage much more than just stirring things up in Iran.
But who was Trump counting on when he encouraged an insurrection then went golfing? (In Iran, I mean.)
It is unknown how many ballistic missiles capable of reaching Israel the Iranians still have and whether they could really do serious damage to Israel in a new round of conflict.
But what is clear is that they do still have huge stockpiles of short-range missiles capable of reaching the countries of the Arabian Peninsula.
I think one reason why Trump is hesitant to go to war with Iran is that the Iranians could completely obliterate the oil industries of Trump’s Arab allies. If that happens, it would be very unlikely that Trump is going to receive his bribes + the huge investments these countries have promised to make into the US.
This is a good point.
Trump knows that Iran can wreck the Gulf States.
He’s not sure if they can paste Israel again. But at least some Israelis don’t want to risk it.
“It is unknown how many ballistic missiles capable of reaching Israel the Iranians still have and whether they could really do serious damage to Israel in a new round of conflict.”
From what I’ve gathered, they probably have enough to unleash a month or two worth of constant missile attacks on Israel. Due to the small size of the country, this would make normal life in Israel impossible and cause tremendous damage to their economy. The Israeli will to fight this fight would probably collapse, due to the fact that Israel is not itself in danger of invasion. And it would be a huge humiliation for the “chosen” nation to have to submit to Iranian terms for a ceasefire, which would motivate all the Arabs around Palestine.
Note that the rapid depletion of the Allied missile defense during the 12-days war meant that, in another conflict that drags on more, the hit ratio of Iranian missiles would drastically improve i.e. they would deal considerably more damage to places like Tel Aviv per missile.
We should keep in mind that, for all their boasting and martial rhetoric, the Israelis are not used to large numbers of casualties on their side. Israelis don’t want to die for the cause, and they’re used to being the side dishing out, not the side receiving.
the US does with its aircraft carrier groups
It is now time to forget all those aircraft carrier groups, B-2 or B-52 bombers, expensive fighters, or stupid Abrams (or any anothers) tanks. Cheap and mass produced drones can destroy enemy ships, aircraft, and armour. If even 500 drones attack a CVN carrier, and someway damage it, it is anyway economically better to drone assaulter, because hundreds and thousands of drones are much cheaper than the repair of a carrier. Drones can attack airfields, industrial objects. oil dumps, and much more targets. The US has not enough cheap and mass produced drones, because for military-industrial complex these products are not lucrative. Just so the aircraft plants and the USAF did not want to buy efficient, but cheap airplanes like F-16 and A-10 in 1970’s (look in the book PENTAGON WARS by James Burton for details). So the US simply cannot win the big war with Iran with conventional weapons.
If you want to destroy Iran, just nuke it. If you are not ready to do it, just leave them alone.
“This looks like strategic miscalculation or stupidity to me.”
Indeed, both Netanyahu and Trump were urging an insurrection by the Iranian people during the 12-Day War back in June. They strongly miscalculated as the nationalistic Iranian people tend to rally behind the flag during wartime. This time, during the insurrection, both Trump and Pahlavi urged the people to take to the streets, “help is on the way”, the former said, thousands were killed, but nothing happened. There is a minority traitors, mostly in the diaspora who support Pahlavi, who, believe it or not, want Israel or U.S. to attack their own homeland. Zero solidarity with those losers.
They may rely on inherent weaknesses of Iran’s situation. The country has a huge minority population of Azeris (around 25 million, if I’m correct, maybe up to 40 million), who are Shiah, but ethnically relatives of Turks. Israel has been pumping resources into neighbour Azerbaijan for a long time and considerably helped them to win a war with Armenia.
And besides that, Persians have been (until recently) ruled by various foreigners for centuries, which has a huge psychological effect on the majority population as well.
Anyway, after the last year’s fiasco, the present assault looks poorly planned, if at all.
Azeris, Kurds, Arabs, Khazars and many another peoples there are in Iran. Some of them want to have their own states.
Notwithstanding the domestic issues Iran has, a prolonged war with Iran carries extreme risks. I do not think Trump can balance both a war with Iran and the Manhattan Project level subversion going on at home. He would be better off putting the armada in the great lakes for potential civil conflict with Pritzker and Waltz than getting involved with a mideast blood fued.
The last article of Wolf Stoner on biocentrism is just about Iran: The Crusade of the Orange Jackal against Persia .
Stoner is a good author, but in one aspect he is wrong in his article. He wrote about paedophilia on Epstein’s island, and for him Iran is a good example, because there allegedly is not paedophilia in Iran. That’s wrong. There is paedophilia in Iran, with young boys, it is called Bacha-bazi. Literally it means “playing with boys”, but this is not play with toy soldiers or model cars. Moreover, the mullahs mostly do it, even if it is illegal.
Viktor Schmidt: February 8, 2026 The last article of Wolf Stoner on biocentrism is just about Iran: The Crusade of the Orange Jackal against Persia .
—
Thanks, Viktor. I’d missed Wolf’s latest: (181) Words of Wolf Stoner – Page 24 – White Biocentrism. I didn’t see him mention pedophilia in Iran, but his conclusion, criticizing Whites in America and Russia equally is worth noting;
…Iran is the very important strategic counterweight to Israel in the region. If destroyed, it would create the most unpredictable consequences not only for the region but for the whole world. The only actors that crave Iran’s annihilation are Israel and worldwide Jewry.
Those whites [lower case] who allow themselves to be implicated in this war on Jewish behalf must be considered as the worst enemies of our race. Yes, not even Jews but white traitors and blockheads, unable to see the simple strategic reality. Sometimes stupidity and malicious intent are equally dangerous and must be punished accordingly. I don’t care whether General Jack Keen is stupid or intentionally lies on behalf of Israel. His militant agitation in support of an all-out war against Iran is a crime against our White race and he and his ilk (and their posterity) must bear responsibility for this crime.
There are some points that must be considered in relation to Iran.
1. Iran is one of the few countries which allows free research of the Holocaust subject; it doesn’t impose state-sanctioned lies about WW2. There is no delusion in Iran about “glorious allies” that “freed the world from Nazism”. On the contrary, Iranians perceive allies (Britain and USSR first of all) as aggressors who occupied Iran during WW2. I have read Khomeini’s books. He was equally hostile to the liberal West and communist Russia. In this regard the Iranian outlook is much more compatible with what pertains to WW2 issue.
2. Before the 1979 Islamic revolution Iran was, essentially, a puppet state of the USA and Israel. Tehran was a den of vices, like 1920es Berlin: “free trade”, brothels, moral decadence of all kinds and corrupt state apparatus. The shah’s regime was a historic disgrace for the Persians. It is why the rebellion against it was supported by the whole nation.
3. Iran is the only state that dares to openly challenge the dictatorship of the rotten globalist post-WW2 system. It is why it is hated so much by Jews and their white gay/pedophile sidekicks.
4. Iran successfully curtails the destructive influence of the Jewish pop-culture. For example, it is forbidden there to use western pop-music in public places. Western decadent clothes are not allowed as well. I always supported those measures; they are necessary in order to preserve the mental and physical health of a society. Iranian women are not herded into Epstein’s pedophile islands. I suppose, it is what drives Jews mad most of all. For Jews the most important mark of their victory is the unlimited access to the women of the conquered nation. In this regard the West is totally subjugated by Jews. White mainstream women are under the mental spell of Jewish pop-culture, which goads them into the most self-destructive behavior, devoid of morals and self-respect. The nation that allows its women to become prostitutes (in the wider sense of this word), can’t claim any real sovereignty; it can’t preserve its identity and compete with the healthier nations.
5. Persians are the ancient nation that had to deal with pernicious Jewish influence thousands of years ago. Iranian collective understanding of the Jewish problem is far deeper than among any European nation. Mental incompatibility between Persians and Jews isn’t going to vanish even if Islamic republic is destroyed by the American Golem and the puppet regime is brought in its place. The Iraq example shows perfectly well that any project of establishing “our democracy” in those lands is bound to fail.
Considering all those points, we must adopt the most uncompromisingly anti-Trump position on this issue. There is no justification to tolerate this brazen militant drive against Iran. This issue must become the stumbling block on which this Jewish jackal Trump falls.
As right as Greg has been about Trump.
Hate that it’s true.
I feel like a second term W voter. 😒
In 2016 DJT against all odds defeated the most powerful political machine since FDR’s New Deal mafia, the CCS, Clinton Crime Syndicate. Since then he never ceases to disappoint. His 2017-21 “Twitter-Presidency”‘s (it’s impotency symbolized with the cancelling of his account by Jack Dorsey) great accomplishment was to let the Democrats install Biden in office so we could all get the Covid “treatment.” When he defeated the Hindu AA-stooge last year, I had some hopes … Fool me twice….
The screws have come loose in his head and he’s a full blown megalomaniac, putting his name on everything he can think of, and constantly bellowing out an incoherent fog of threats, insults bluster and self-worship. People who know how to exercise real power don’t act like this — adolescent grandstanding for praise and attention — for long.
Bibi is coming this Wednesday (fifth or sixth) visit since Trump’s 2025 inauguration to demand … well … and to confirm beyond any doubt who is in charge of U.S. foreign policy.
My greatest personal disappointment with Trump is that he didn’t get Derek Chauvin out of prison — by hook or by crook. Who cares how? Who is following the rules anymore? DC should have gotten a commendation. Instead, he was set up by Minnesota Black Mulim, AG Keith Ellison with Biden and Maxine doing jury intimidation. That he is still in prison is an outrage, but Trump is looking more and more like Nero.
Iran has a right to defend itself.
Nick Fuentes had the right idea in 2024.
The time to negotiate with Trump was before the election.
We needed a firm promise that he would deport all the illegals, not wage wars for the benefit of Israel.
From our perspective, the economic effects of mass deportation (higher wages, lower housing costs) are a feature, not a bug.
If clear, firm promises were not forthcoming, we all should have voted for an agreed-on write-in protest candidate so that it would be clear exactly why he lost to Kamala.
That would’ve given the potential 2028 Republican candidates something to think about.
Having Kamala at the helm while Israel continued its atrocities in Gaza would’ve done far more to weaken the left than anything Trump has done.
Now the stink of Israel and Epstein is on us, not the Democrats, and we have nothing to show for it.
It would be nice if whites were thekind of bloc that could make demands of a presidential candidate. But Fuentes had no cards. He could not make his threats to tank the election plausible. So he was ignored.
Besides, most people who voted for Trump believed that a Harris presidency would have been worse for America. Trump could have done nothing at all as president and still been better for America than Harris.
Demand firm promises? As if the political class, rat parasites don’t flip flop as naturally as they breathe. You are unintentionally hilarious!
a genuine geopolitical rival: China.
Iran is a Chinese vassal, just like Russia is.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.