1,613 words
I recently watched a video of an interview with Adam Presser. According to AI, Adam, a colorless, scripted thirty-something, is a senior technology executive appointed in January 2026 as the CEO of the new TikTok US Data Security (USDS) joint venture, created to comply with US divest-or-ban laws.
The video is short and a must watch to get a grasp on the Talmudic mind set of the Zionists who control the social media outlets and the openness and brazenness with which the “chosen people” present their ideology. Upon viewing Presser in action, you must conclude that this double-talking, empty suit regards the non-Zionist viewer much the way a shake down artist sees his mark.
Here is how the TikTok Minister of Truth, Adam “O’Brien” Presser manipulates the “Winstons” out there in social media land into believing that “war is peace,” Jews are eternal victims, and the obliteration of Gaza and its indigenous population is self-defense. His script is a peculiar mix of schoolmarm scolding with “we know where your children play” gangland intimidation.
So, you can use it [the term “Zionist”] in the sense of a proud Zionist [no problem], but if you using it in the context of degrading someone, calling somebody a dirty name, then that gets designated as hate speech to be moderated. Over 2024 we tripled the accounts we were banning for hateful activities. We also have over two dozen Jewish organizations that are feeding us intelligence and information when they spot violative trends.
Let’s see: So, in a post I proclaim myself to be a “proud Zionist” and the TikTok clerics are happy because they themselves are Zionists, and Zionism only comes in one flavor, the “proud” package. The business model of the TikTok top brass as it applies to the banning of “hate speech” closely resembles that of a confederacy of mafia dons. As “business men,” their decisions are always guided by the principle of “eliminating” anyone who might dare to challenge their extortion monopolies over their captured clients. The TikTok executives in the business of shaping the moral perceptions of nearly two billion active monthly users, are enforcing their “trademark” monopoly of the image of the Jewish people in a never-ending battle with anti-Semitism. “Children” in the Jewish sandbox play by Jewish rules.
Here, though, is the best part or the interview: “There is no finish line. . . to moderating hate speech, identifying hateful trends, trying to keep the platform safe. There is no such thing as an end game.”
You can order the Centennial Edition of Francis Parker Yockey’s Imperium here.
Translation: there are no limits to Jewish power, no “end game” for those seeking the perpetual enlargement of existing privileges. Jews own TikTok. Jews run it with over two dozen Jewish organizations “feeding us intelligence.” What kind of “intelligence” might that be? Would “violative trends” for these Jewish organizations be thought crimes that express insufficient reverence for the memory of the Holocaust? Would it be “hate speech” to say that these organizations function exclusively to aggressively censor criticism of Jewish misbehavior using the weapon of “anti-Semitism” to extort submission to Zionist priorities and preserve the status of Jews as the eternally righteous victims?
“There is no such thing as an end game” because anti-Semitism is always on the rise; a second Auschwitz is always just around the corner.
Could anyone with the most meager critical capacity not comprehend that the man giving this interview is telling us that TikTok exists to serve the Zionist interests. . . exclusively? Keeping the “platform safe” is about keeping Jewish feelings safe. Presser brags about having tripled the number of banned accounts over the year 2024. What was happening in 2024 that might explain this spike in censorship? He seemed to be unaware of what is becoming increasingly obvious: that, when you stop and think about “hate” expressed not in speech but in a reaction to large numbers of exterminated civilians, the year of 2024 was when the IDF, the “most moral army in the world,” per Benjamin Netanyahu, was turning the homes, schools, hospitals and shops of Gaza into ruble littered with the corpses of tens of thousands of women, children, and elderly.
Anyone who self-references as “most moral” immediately deserves to be treated with the greatest suspicion as a charlatan and a threat to anyone who believes him.
More people are noticing that Jewish behavior is drastically in opposition to what is expected from a civilized people, a self- proclaimed “chosen people,” guided by a just God, and that the constant Holocaust reminders and the pursuit and punishment of anti-Semites are a designed distraction from the most barbarous collective conduct of the twenty first century. How many times must we endure the disgusting spectacle of the cretinous Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House pulling on the dog collar he has around Donald Fido Trump’s neck, putting up his middle finger to the entire world and with a sneer: “So, what are you going to do about it, Smucks?”
But a bit more about “Proud Zionists” who get the green light from TikTok gate keepers. How about if “in the context of degrading someone,” that “someone” is proud Zionist, Jonathan Pollard, an American-born Israeli former intelligence analyst who was jailed for spying for Israel?
From the Federation of American Scientists:
President Clinton has ordered a formal review of the case of Jonathan Pollard, the former U-S naval intelligence officer who in 1987 was sentenced to life in prison for selling top secret information to Israel. However, CIA Director, George Tenet has threatened to resign if Pollard is freed, and other US officials, past and present, also have strongly objected. While some American Jewish Groups, as well as the Likud party in Israel, have asked for clemency—many have not taken a position on the controversy.
Spies are as old as the American Republic and have been particularly plentiful in the twentieth century. Even so, intelligence analysts say the Jonathan Pollard case is something special. They believe the American spy for Israel stole more vital documents than any other agent in US history.
Here, as Paul Harvey used to say, “is the end of the story.” American presidents were under constant pressure from the Jewish lobby to free the worst spy in American history, working on behalf of our “indispensable ally,” as AIPAC puts it, “that helps keep America safe, strong and prosperous.” Pollard was released on parole in 2015 when the Obama administration caved. It did not, as it could have, oppose the parole commission’s decision to release him. In 2020, President Donald Trump dropped Pollard’s parole restrictions, and on Trump’s chief donor, Sheldon Adelson’s private jet, this fat, repulsive American-Israeli traitor was flown to Israel. There he was personally greeted on the tarmac by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who with cameras rolling handed him his Israeli citizenship card, a deliberate symbolic gesture that said “fuck you” to those Americans who might be wondering why the US government lavishes money, arms and adoration on these treacherous small hat people who shamelessly spy on us. In November, 2025, Pollard was warmly greeted in the US Embassy in Jerusalem by the Ambassador to Israel and Christian Zionist, Mike Huckabee, to receive Pollard’s thanks for “his efforts on my behalf during my incarceration.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday the White House was “not aware of the meeting” in advance, but that President Trump “stands by our ambassador, Mike Huckabee, and all that he’s doing for the United States and Israel.”
Yes, we know “all that he’s doing for Israel” and to the United States. Trump’s betrayal of his “America First” promise could not be clearer with this mindless, insulting endorsement of Huckabee. In a country run by patriots instead of the soulless power machine whose lip service to “human rights” and a “rules based international order” is laughable hypocrisy, a kook like Huckabee, who consorts with traitors, would never have been allowed to serve on any governing body, even a local school board.
I am wagering that for Adam Presser O’Brien the mention of Pollard’s damaging spying career would qualify as “hate speech.”
“Hate speech” is completely bogus as a justification for censoring speech as evidenced by its arbitrary application motivated by self-interested tribalists who themselves never hesitate to defame and slander their critics as moral cretins and endless reincarnations of “Hitler.”
Hatred is a common, universal human emotion that everyone to various degrees experiences at some time in his life. Which makes “hate” a morally ambiguous term. Many aspects of the human personality and behavior are rightfully the objects of hatred, such as the personality of the pedophile Jeffry Epstein, whose life’s mission was to serve his Zionist employers in the business of blackmail. Thus, it should be obvious that the notion that “hate speech” is an unmitigated evil is a subterfuge that gives ideologues a tool to dispose of their critics without having to engage with them. “Moderating hate speech” is a euphemism for “exerting Jewish power.”
I wonder if “proud Zionist” Adam Presser has read the Old Testament lately, or ever. He might have discovered that the Zionist’s God was himself inclined toward hatred.
These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood. An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief. A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren. (Proverbs 6:16-19 KJV)
Wicked imaginations. . .
He that soweth discord among brethren. . .
A proud look. . .
But, most of all,
Hands that shed innocent blood.
Any speculation on what particular tribe these days might be “an abomination to him,” the Lord?
11 comments
This article will make you think twice about what you put on TikTok or whether you should have a TikTok account at all.
“There is no finish line. . . to moderating hate speech, identifying hateful trends, trying to keep the platform safe. There is no such thing as an end game.”
Now where have I heard that before?
Oh yeah..
“Doin’ right ain’t got no end” – Captain ‘Redlegs’ Terrill, in The Outlaw Josey Wales.
Granny Hawkins:
They say you’re a hard put and desperate man, Josey Wales. They’re goin’ to heel and hide you to a barn door. You know what I say?
Josey Wales:
What’s that?
Granny Hawkins:
I say that big talk’s worth doodly-squat.
The Outlaw Josey Wales
Great article! I don’t even know what a TikTok account is. 🙃
No great loss. It’s just another tool to further degrade our attention spans.
Perhaps Brian Berletic isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, but a video on his New Atlas channel from a few years ago: “China’s “Social Credit Score System” – Fact or Fiction?” stayed lodged in my brain.
Now we know how the Chinese threat that Tik-Tok posed was just another jew-driven scare ploy to take hold of that network’s reins, it is more obvious in hindsight that the dystopian hype in the western media about the Chinese system Berletic discussed was just projection and a preview of the inevitable Zio Credit Score system.
Perhaps, just like on food products, all app and browser windows will have a kosher certification icon in the corner.
How I pray that the wrecking ball that’s the Epstein scandal loses no momentum!
Peter Quint: …I don’t even know what a TikTok account is.
—
You’re smart, Peter. There’s nothing good at TikTok for us.
National Alliance member Jim Mathias just posted this today at WhiteBiocentrism.com with Bibi Netanyahoo bragging about his multi-billionaire media magnate, butt buddy Larry Ellison’s purchasing of TikTok: (58) Is Israel Taking Over US Media Through 2 Billionaires? – YouTube
Watch it quickly and save it if you can before (((those))) at JewTube take it down. Exposure of these TikTok Jews that will not be taken down is this at nationalvanguard.org “Larry Ellison, TikTok, and the Jewish Takeover of the American Mind “
There is no higher priority for White racial nationalists than exposing the power these powerful Jews have over us Whites — then removing them!
Well said. These people can dish out the criticism, but they sure can’t take it.
Excellent essay. Really. Too many powerful observations to enumerate.
I don’t need Mr. Presser to inform me about Tik Tok or “hate speech” on social media, thanks. To hell with those Mr. Foster rightly describes as ” the Zionists who control the social media outlets” as well as social media altogether for that matter. I prefer the wisdom of our own, like by my friend, pro-White author extraordinaire, Dr. Thomas Dalton: “On the True Meaning of Hate Speech” at nationalvanguard.org
—
“A law against Jew-hatred is usually the beginning of the end for the Jews.”
—Joseph Goebbels, diary (April 19, 1943)
‘HATE’ IS SUCH an ugly word. And such a juvenile word. It calls to mind the stereotypical eight-year-old girl who screams “I hate you!” to her mother when she is not allowed to join the local sleep-over. The word is most often used half-jokingly — “I hate the Yankees!”, “I hate broccoli!”, etc. — or to describe some detested task (“I hate cleaning the bathroom”). Or it can be used for rhetorical effect. But the use of the term in the context of ‘hate speech’ is silly, juvenile, and formally meaningless. We may dislike someone or some group, or be repulsed by them, or wish to dissociate from them. But to hate them? Seriously — what mature individual today is willing to openly and earnestly say “I hate you” to anyone? Only a highly insecure or severely distressed person would do such a thing. It’s a sign of weakness.
And yet today, hate seems to be the ethos of the moment. More specifically, we seem to be surrounded by talk of ‘hate speech’ in the mass media. To judge by various headlines and liberal pundits, hate speech would appear to be among the greatest dangers of modern existence — on par with “racism” and “White supremacy,” and greater than political corruption, international terrorism, global pandemics, financial instability, environmental decline, overpopulation, or uncontrollable industrial technology. Most European countries have legal prohibitions against various forms of hate speech, however ill-defined, as do Canada and Australia. Even in the US there is increasing pressure to create legal sanction for some such concept, the First Amendment notwithstanding.
I take this whole topic very personally. It’s no secret that I’ve written harshly against Jews and other minorities. It’s no secret that I prefer living in a White community and a White nation. I have no need to apologize for any of this. And yet, for these very reasons, some people find it appropriate to call me a ‘hater’: “Dalton hates the Jews”; “he hates Blacks,” “he hates Latinos,” etc., etc. But I state here, for the record, that nothing is further from the truth. I hate no one. I may dislike certain people, I may find them malevolent and malicious, I may want them punished, and I may want to separate myself from them; but this does not mean that I hate them. In this era of “hate crimes” and “hate speech laws,” this requires some explanation.
As usual, we should start by knowing what we are talking about. What, exactly, is it to ‘hate’? The word has ancient origins, deriving from the Indo-European kədes and Greek kedos. Originally, and surprisingly, it meant simply ‘strong feelings’ in a neutral sense, rather than something negative. In fact, the Old Irish word caiss includes both love and hate. But the negative connotation emerged with the Germanic khatis (later, hass), the Dutch haat, and eventually became ingrained in the English ‘hate.’
The standard dictionary definition typically runs something like this: “intense or extreme dislike, aversion, or hostility” toward someone or something. As such, the word is fairly innocuous; I can hate my job, hate asparagus, and even hate my boss. But this is not at issue. We are more concerned about hate as a mindset, and specifically as oriented toward classes of people, or increasingly, toward certain privileged ideologies.
But we immediately confront a major problem here: Hate is a feeling, and feelings are indelibly subjective. And anything that is completely subjective cannot be quantified in objective terms. No one can say with certainty that “Dalton hates X.” Only I can say, “I hate X,” precisely because it is my own feeling. If there is one thing that I insist upon, it is complete sovereignty over my own feelings. No one else will ever dictate how I feel about anything….
Read more from Dr. Dalton about “hate speech” at the link.
“into ruble littered with the corpses ”
Russian money?
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.