1,011 words
On Wednesday, February 11, the US House of Representative Judiciary Committee convened a hearing on the Epstein files. In her testimony, Pam Bondi, Donald Trump’s DEI hire for US Attorney General, disgraced herself. She was combative, evasive, shrill, and emotionally manipulative.
The low point was when she claimed that the US Congress should be focused on the DOW hitting 50,000, not the Epstein case. Such shameless deflection is shocking.
Bondi also screeched that Thomas Massie is a “failed politician” and a “hypocrite”—which is ironic given that Trump’s ratings are tanking and that releasing the files was one of Trump’s key campaign promises.
Bondi also clashed with several Democrats, such as Jerry Nadler, who seemed more interested in smearing Trump than in bringing his fellow Democrats to justice. Bondi even insinuated that Becca Balint, a Jewish Democrat, was not sufficiently opposed to anti-Semitism based on her voting record. Balint predictably countered with the Holocaust.
Government officials tend to keep one eye on cultivating media reactions while they go about their jobs. But with Bondi, it is all grandstanding: all image, no substance, all the time. When Bondi wasn’t stonewalling, she was blurting out sound bites to feed Boomers in the White House and Zoomers on X. The Zoomers aren’t buying it, however.
Bondi’s performance communicates two things: (1) She’s really dumb, and (2) Trump desperately wants to cover up what’s in the Epstein files.
We wouldn’t need these hearings at all if Pam Bondi and Kash Patel were actually doing what Congress legislated and Trump signed into law: releasing the Epstein documents.
Bondi isn’t releasing the Epstein files because Trump told her to cover them up. Pam Bondi works for Donald Trump. She’s loyal to Donald Trump. She’s not loyal to Congress or the American people.
Pam Bondi has refused to follow the law. She has also lied about the Epstein coverup under oath. As has Kash Patel. They both need to be removed from office, jailed, and tried for these crimes.
Pam Bondi’s Department of Justice (DOJ) can’t be trusted to investigate her boss and her boss’ friends. There’s a simple conflict of interest here.
Fortunately, there is a solution for this: appoint a Special Counsel.
In the U.S., a Special Counsel (formerly Independent Counsel or Special Prosecutor) is a lawyer appointed to investigate and potentially prosecute specific, sensitive cases involving high-ranking officials where the DOJ has a conflict of interest and where the public interest requires an independent investigator to take charge.
A Special Counsel is appointed by the Attorney General. (I am sure Pam can squeeze that in between her next facial and nail job.) Once installed, Special Counsels operate with substantial independence from the DOJ, meaning that Bondi and Patel would no longer be able to cover up the Epstein files.
Appointing a Special Counsel is not a novel solution to a crisis or scandal. They were used for the Whiskey Ring in 1875 (corruption), the Teapot Dome scandal in the 1920s (corruption), Watergate in 1973, Iran-Contra in 1986, Whitewater in 1994 (which began as a corruption inquiry but came to encompass the Monica Lewinsky scandal), the Russian collusion hoax in 2017, and Hunter Biden in 2023. A common theme running throughout them is that there are times when the government can’t be trusted to investigate itself due to systematic corruption, people of power, and conflicts of interest.
Aside from Iran-Contra, past uses of Special Counsels seem rather vanilla, especially when compared to the Epstein case: a convicted child sex trafficker with ties to foreign intelligence services accumulating material that could be used to blackmail American political and financial elites across the entire political spectrum. For one thing, the foreign intelligence angle moves the Epstein case out of the realm of routine corruption and into the realm of treason.
We need to know to what extent US politics were manipulated by a foreign blackmail ring. Public trust in America’s institutions is already cratering. It may never return. But it certainly won’t return if Congress does not pursue the Epstein scandal.
A couple of caveats about appointing a Special Counsel.
First, it is best to have a single individual in charge, not a committee. An individual is more likely to make progress. A committee is more likely to stonewall. If a committee is proposed, we know a fix is in.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s Is America Doomed? here.
Second, Epstein was a Jew working with Jews for Jewish interests. For instance, he was quite chummy with Ehud Barak, former Israeli Defense Minister, Foreign Minister, and Prime Minister. Epstein’s long-time co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, was the daughter of Robert Maxwell, whose services to Israel merited a state funeral attended by the President Chaim Herzog (who delivered the eulogy), Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, Housing Minister Ariel Sharon, and six serving and former heads of Mossad. Those foreign intelligence connections point to Israel.
Thus if a Jew—or a non-Jew with Jewish in-laws, business connections, and Zionist affiliations—is proposed as Special Counsel, we’ll know the fix is in. If America is to have justice, we must confront Jewish privilege. Allowing Jews and their sympathizers to investigate Epstein is as foolish as allowing Indians to investigate H-1B immigration fraud. The Epstein case has mainstreamed the so-called Jewish Question to the widest extent in a century. Pretending otherwise will only deepen the crisis of legitimacy.
Trump will obviously resist appointing a Special Counsel. In July, 2025, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed this: “The president would not recommend a special prosecutor in the Epstein case. That’s how he feels.” Of course that’s how he feels. Trump doesn’t want an independent investigation, because he wants a coverup. Thus he wants the DOJ entirely under his control.
Demanding a Special Counsel is a “Heads we win, tails they lose” proposition. If we get a sufficiently qualified and neutral Special Counsel, we win. If the administration refuses to appoint a Special Counsel, or appoints one who is an unqualified podcaster or tainted with a conflict of interest, they lose legitimacy.
Representative Massie, it is time to call for a Special Counsel.
25 comments
Blondie is going to appoint a special counsel because she won’t do her job, because her boss doesn’t want her to? How’s that going to work out? Yeesh.
I hear John “Bull(sh!t)” Durham is tan, rested and ready.
Yet somehow Special Counsels do get appointed.
Appointed? Sure. Effective? Or just next-level Kabuki?
OT, Happy SAINT Valentine’s Day to all!
Lol, your sexism is too funny. You’d be surprised how much time a good facial takes, especially if you are getting injectables as these wealthy broads do.
I only saw clips of the hearing but was like, WTF? when she mentioned the stock market. I think she was taking Trump’s lead when he said the other day that Americans are more interested in the economy (bread and butter issues) than with the Epstein file. Even though it may be vomit inducing, I think a Special Counsel is a great idea.
The entire hearing was a spectacle, a reminder of how unserious and retarded mainstream American politics really are. I find it impossible to sit through this performative, juvenile nonsense.
The obsession with the number on the big line has been a constant since the first Trump administration. In the 2020 election cycle, his platform was basically a combination of “George Floyd would be so proud of my platinum plan” and “before COVID we almost hit DOW 40,000.”
Here’s the problem with harping on the big line. Approximately 62% of Americans have something invested in the stock market, most of which is in the form of retirement funds. So right on its face, you have almost 40% of the electorate where the stock market has no readily apparent impact on their lives whatsoever (voters are always going to look at what is readily apparent). Of the 62% that cares about it at all, most have so little to invest that 10,000 points on the DOW is at best a nice little windfall, not a life changing sum. Most of the people who meaningfully benefit from a soaring stock market – the wealthy – are committed liberals, so they’re not supporting Trump even if it hits DOW 6,000,000.
Despite what conventional wisdom says, this really is not an issue that animates most of the electorate. When voters say they care about the economy, they mean the cost of living. That’s really the only way that anyone aside from the wealthy experiences the economy. The stock market is now almost completely separated from actual on the ground economic reality. All this to say that DOW 50,000 is basically politically irrelevant, just like “DOW almost 40,000” was irrelevant in 2020. It’s obvious that Trump is never learning this lesson.
This is a very good point.
Most people in their 20s fall into a couple of categories when it comes to money. Almost all have relatively low income potential. Those with decent jobs but have yet to start a family tend to be more impulsive about spending (and wasting) money. The ones with families are just trying to keep heads above water.
When people get into their 30s, if they are lucky, they’re looking to buy a home, dependable transportation, and provide a comfortable life for their families. When faced with a choice between braces for a 13 year old, or investing in NVDA stock, it’s probably going to be the braces. Other people in their 30s and still without families are still blowing money on everything that substitutes for the the loneliness of being single and childless. Investing for the future MIGHT be on their radar, but a new Mercedes or expensive truck with all the bells and whistles is still going to come first.
It isn’t until the 40s that a lot of people start putting some priority in retirement investments, but often the cost of life in their 20s and 30s got so overwhelming (divorces, expensive childcare costs etc) that they also have debt that they’re trying to manage.
It isn’t until people hit their 50s that serious panic kicks in about saving for retirement. By then it’s too late for most people to really build wealth. They’re just playing catch up and hoping to have enough to live comfortably on, or at least not be in poverty, and hopefully (emphasis on hopefully) leave a little for their families in an inheritance.
It is the 50+ people, and some older 40somethings, with decent 401k plans or IRAs, who focus on the stock market, but even those people are concerned about inflation and rising living costs. A pension isn’t worth much if it can’t keep up. So yeah, it’s true that the bread and butter economic concerns are far greater than the stock market.
Very well said.
“Representative Massie, it is time to call for a Special Counsel.”
If he calls for one, it may also be time to add some life insurance, update his will, and make sure his affairs are in order. Also, be prepared for embarrassing photos. ZOG will not be pleased.
Congressional hearings should be just like a criminal trial. Those being questioned should not be allowed to deflect or refuse to answer. And anyone saying “I thank you for the question” should get life in prison without parole.
The standard of a criminal trial would be much too strict. However, Pamela Bondi’s performance on Wednesday was beneath contempt. Instead, she should follow the example of her predecessor, Merrick Garland. He would listen patiently to the GOP Senators and Congressmen interrogating him, and answer quietly and without insulting anyone. His answers were often dishonest and evasive, but at least he was civil.
I liked the GOP Senators and Congressmen, and I agreed with their questions and comments to Garland and other Biden appointees. It is the job of the Legislative branch to hold the Executive branch to account. Garland understood this simple fact, and behaved well, even if he lied and evaded the truth.
Trump finally appoints some loyalists and we can definitively see where the loyalties lie.
Trump puts Israel first, himself second, and America a distant third.
NOTE: THE FOLLOWING POST IS WEIRDLY NOT THE ORIGINAL VERSION BUT A SUBSEQUENT NESTED RESPONSE. THIS IS SOMEHOW A FLAW WITH THE BOARD’S COMMENTARY AND EDITING SOFTWARE. I KNOW WHAT I ORIGINALLY POSTED, AND WHAT WAS RESPONDED TO. THERE IS NO POINT IS TRYING TO FIX IT NOW. APPARENTLY THE EDITING FEATURE HAS BECOME USELESS NOW BECAUSE WHEN YOU TRY TO FIX A TYPO SOMETHING WEIRD RESULTS. THERE IS ALMOST NO POINT IN COMMENTING ON THIS BOARD ANYMORE. I HAVE TRIED MULTIPLE BROWSERS.
XXXXXX
“Trump and Bondi are concealing the worse files, numbering over one million. That makes them in violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. They are concerned with Israel’s national security, not ours.”
Even if that were true, and I highly doubt it, if it can’t be proved then it didn’t happen. That is the way that the Law works.
I learned this the hard way when I served as a Union Shop Steward in the Broadcasting Industry and had to build and defend grievance cases, much of which hinged on circumstantial evidence.
I had to convince administrative judges to win for the Union, and most of the time my opposition colleagues were expensive attorneys and dirtbag labor consultants. I never even went to law school.
I had to learn the hard way that justice isn’t always about what is right but what also can be won ─ and what was just rainbow pie. Sometimes you had to be a diplomat too. Sometimes you had to honestly defend stupid and lazy people and I never liked that. Your opposition would shamelessly exploit your personal preferences if they could discern them, so I made it a point (learning the hard way) never to carp about losers in public if I was supposed to be advocating for them.
Usually victory hinged on being able to prove what violated bright line rules and what could actually be proved convincingly. Meticulous documentation and ordered thinking is the key. Formal Logic is your friend.
I don’t mind the release of the Epstein files. I think it’s really a nothing-burger but what do I know? Like Bernie Madoff, Epstein and Ghislaine have already been punished.
What I am opposed to is making the matter a hill to die on either way. The Trump DOJ backed itself into a corner by dealing with the matter at all. That was also Nixon’s error.
I am rather disgusted that some in Congress are trying to get some Bible Belt street credit here. An important role of Congress is to chastise. Senator Joe McCarthy was pretty good at it until Eisenhower became President. Suddenly the winds had changed and then the old formula that held the Truman Administration and its pinko “Wise Men” to scrutiny fell apart fast. The Junior Senator from Wisconsin also did not have a talent for the new medium of television.
So, YES, chastise ─ Epstein’s peccadilloes are as good as any other. But we are not talking about Jews giving away atomic bomb secrets to the Communists here. This is really just stupid gossip instead about degenerate Jews and rich inbred loser perverts like Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
What I do agree with is making unredacted Epstein files available for Congressional and academic perusal. I don’t think things could get any worse, but I really don’t care. I don’t think anybody is going to find an actionable smoking-gun here, even if it really mattered.
After World War II, the British government classified all their war documents to make sure that nobody in the future could slander the Milords. The Victors knew that there was much dodgy material that went on by the Good Guys in the Good War, so it made perfect sense. They wanted nothing but historical hagiography from vetted Court Historians.
But the Americans saw it differently or at least had less inhibitions. They tended to do massive government file dumps. It was a treasure trove of historical research fodder. OOPS. Lots of stuff about the British Milords in there too. The First Amendment was no respecter of posh persons.
Later UK historians like David Irving made a career out of exploring the other side of the conflict; he learned how to read the scribbles of diarists like Dr. Goebbels, and gained the trust of many German officials still alive to bear witness to the immediate past.
Transparency is our friend ─ I believe in it ─ and I do not like that Mr. Trump often fails to see the importance of this.
I don’t follow all that much edgy Internet podcast drama, so I can’t really speak to that, but nobody is seriously trying to “apologize for Epstein.” That’s just crazy talk.
Epstein was covered for by Establishment inertia until he wasn’t, and then he became infinitely radioactive and likely did kill himself in his prison cell ─ not so hard to do, even with the usual Dindus watching. At Nuremberg, Dr. Robert Ley pulled it off while under 24-hour surveillance. OOPS.
Like the JFK files, I don’t see why the Epstein affair really needed to be classified in the first place. Epstein was no less radioactive than Robert Maxwell, even for Israel.
And we might as well go into Scientology and Thetan engrams, and shape-shifting lizard people too if we want to take the Joo blackmail angle further. I just can’t picture Dershowitz and his wife actually having a threesome on Pedo Island with Virginia Giuffre. Sorry. Even victims can be crazy liars and whores.
Regarding the so-called JFK files, the matter has been studied to death by many government panels, and there is just no There there. There isn’t any secret sauce that somebody has been hiding. Sometimes we have to face reality even if some would like to think otherwise.
The main reason that this is even a thing ─ decades after the fact ─ is because so many from a generation slightly older than me just can’t fathom that a dyslexic loser like Lee Harvey Oswald could get a few shots off at Saint Jack and actually get lucky.
They are never going to find a CIA, Mossad, FBI, Mafia, or any other kind of gunman at the Grassy Knoll ─ but that was never the point anyway. Three-letter agencies just don’t like to do file dumps, especially if the optics are not good.
And it is not like Dealey Plaza in November of 1963 had Feds there who had it in for Jack. Instead the Bureau were looking elsewhere for Klansmen ─ or taking a proverbial bite out of the shared shït sandwich, i.e., those whose official job it was to run cover for and to otherwise keep tabs on Doctah King’s debauchery.
Nobody likes Pedos, Cannibals, Ritual Perversion in general, Human Trafficking, Human Sacrifice, and Santanic freaks. These things might sometimes be real but they are more commonly found in the movies (and maybe Hollywood) than lurking behind every bush ─ and besides, this is just not how society is actually organized outside of the Four Gospels paradigm.
Many might want to believe it, but this is not why Western Civilization is in decline now either.
However, it is the red meat paradigm for some Sedevacantists and Evangelicals. They are just as bad as the “epistemological nihilists” that don’t think Americans really landed on the Moon or don’t think that atomic bombs are real because they can’t understand how complex things work.
I believe in Freedom-of-Conscience, and I believe that our ancestors earned that right with generations of their blood and toil. I would like to see the concept preserved. I did not walk across the Plains “barefoot” like some of my ancestors fleeing murderous mobs. That is not the reality of my life.
But, no, I don’t believe that “Jewish scriptures” contain as much truth as so many people seem to think that they do.
Back to Bondi. I highly doubt it, but perhaps we can surmise that she is hiding “the good stuff.” There may or may not be some indirect evidence for that case, and it may be convincing ─ or it may not be.
But if it can’t be proved, then in the eyes of the Law, it didn’t happen.
There was a famous Professor Anton who authenticated some copied ancient language characters as being real and genuine.
But when he asked to see the originals, he was told that unfortunately this was impossible because God had already taken the records back to Heaven.
Womp. Womp. Womp.
Well, that was the end of the good professor’s authentication: “I cannot read a closed book,” he said.
And he was absolutely right.
🙂
Trump and Bondi are concealing the worse files, numbering over one million. That makes them in violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. They are concerned with Israel’s national security, not ours.
However, their limited disclosures (although heavily redacted) prove what anti-Semites have always said about Jewish pedophile rings. And Jewish subversion of America, its people and its culture. Most Jews opposed any release of any Epstein files. They want to move on to invading Iran or something else. Anything else. Trump agrees with them, because he is their servant.
“Trump and Bondi are concealing the worse files, numbering over one million. That makes them in violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. They are concerned with Israel’s national security, not ours.”
Even if that were true, and I highly doubt it, if it can’t be proved then it didn’t happen. That is the way that the Law works.
I learned this the hard way when I served as a Union Shop Steward in the Broadcasting Industry and had to build and defend grievance cases, much of which hinged on circumstantial evidence.
I had to convince administrative judges to win for the Union, and most of the time my opposition colleagues were expensive attorneys and dirtbag labor consultants. I never even went to law school.
I had to learn the hard way that justice isn’t always about what is right but what also can be won ─ and what was just rainbow pie. Sometimes you had to be a diplomat too. Sometimes you had to honestly defend stupid and lazy people and I never liked that. Your opposition would shamelessly exploit your personal preferences if they could discern them, so I made it a point (learning the hard way) never to carp about losers in public if I was supposed to be advocating for them.
Usually victory hinged on being able to prove what violated bright line rules and what could actually be proved convincingly. Meticulous documentation and ordered thinking is the key. Formal Logic is your friend.
I don’t mind the release of the Epstein files. I think it’s really a nothing-burger but what do I know? Like Bernie Madoff, Epstein and Ghislaine have already been punished.
What I am opposed to is making the matter a hill to die on either way. The Trump DOJ backed itself into a corner by dealing with the matter at all. That was also Nixon’s error.
I am rather disgusted that some in Congress are trying to get some Bible Belt street credit here. An important role of Congress is to chastise. Senator Joe McCarthy was pretty good at it until Eisenhower became President. Suddenly the winds had changed and then the old formula that held the Truman Administration and its pinko “Wise Men” to scrutiny fell apart fast. The Junior Senator from Wisconsin also did not have a talent for the new medium of television.
So, YES, chastise ─ Epstein’s peccadilloes are as good as any other. But we are not talking about Jews giving away atomic bomb secrets to the Communists here. This is really just stupid gossip instead about degenerate Jews and rich inbred loser perverts like Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
What I do agree with is making unredacted Epstein files available for Congressional and academic perusal. I don’t think things could get any worse, but I really don’t care. I don’t think anybody is going to find an actionable smoking-gun here, even if it really mattered.
After World War II, the British government classified all their war documents to make sure that nobody in the future could slander the Milords. The Victors knew that there was much dodgy material that went on by the Good Guys in the Good War, so it made perfect sense. They wanted nothing but historical hagiography from vetted Court Historians.
But the Americans saw it differently or at least had less inhibitions. They tended to do massive government file dumps. It was a treasure trove of historical research fodder. OOPS. Lots of stuff about the British Milords in there too. The First Amendment was no respecter of posh persons.
Later UK historians like David Irving made a career out of exploring the other side of the conflict; he learned how to read the scribbles of diarists like Dr. Goebbels, and gained the trust of many German officials still alive to bear witness to the immediate past.
Transparency is our friend ─ I believe in it ─ and I do not like that Mr. Trump often fails to see the importance of this.
I don’t follow all that much edgy Internet podcast drama, so I can’t really speak to that, but nobody is seriously trying to “apologize for Epstein.” That’s just crazy talk.
Epstein was covered for by Establishment inertia until he wasn’t, and then he became infinitely radioactive and likely did kill himself in his prison cell ─ not so hard to do, even with the usual Dindus watching. At Nuremberg, Dr. Robert Ley pulled it off while under 24-hour surveillance. OOPS.
Like the JFK files, I don’t see why the Epstein affair really needed to be classified in the first place. Epstein was no less radioactive than Robert Maxwell, even for Israel.
And we might as well go into Scientology and Thetan engrams, and shape-shifting lizard people too if we want to take the Joo blackmail angle further. I just can’t picture Dershowitz and his wife actually having a threesome on Pedo Island with Virginia Giuffre. Sorry. Even victims can be crazy liars and whores.
Regarding the so-called JFK files, the matter has been studied to death by many government panels, and there is just no There there. There isn’t any secret sauce that somebody has been hiding. Sometimes we have to face reality even if some would like to think otherwise.
The main reason that this is even a thing ─ decades after the fact ─ is because so many from a generation slightly older than me just can’t fathom that a dyslexic loser like Lee Harvey Oswald could get a few shots off at Saint Jack and actually get lucky.
They are never going to find a CIA, Mossad, FBI, Mafia, or any other kind of gunman at the Grassy Knoll ─ but that was never the point anyway. Three-letter agencies just don’t like to do file dumps, especially if the optics are not good.
And it is not like Dealey Plaza in November of 1963 had Feds there who had it in for Jack. Instead the Bureau were looking elsewhere for Klansmen ─ or taking a proverbial bite out of the shared shït sandwich, i.e., those whose official job it was to run cover for and to otherwise keep tabs on Doctah King’s debauchery.
Nobody likes Pedos, Cannibals, Ritual Perversion in general, Human Trafficking, Human Sacrifice, and Santanic freaks. These things might sometimes be real but they are more commonly found in the movies than lurking behind every bush ─ and besides, this is just not how society is actually organized outside of the Four Gospels.
Many might want to believe it, but this is not why Western Civilization is in decline either.
However, it is the red meat paradigm for some Sedevacantists and Evangelicals. They are just as bad as the “epistemological nihilists” that don’t think Americans really landed on the Moon or that atomic bombs are real because they can’t understand how complex things work.
I believe in Freedom-of-Conscience, and I believe that our ancestors earned that right with generations of their blood and toil. I would like to see the concept preserved. I did not walk across the Plains “barefoot” like some of my ancestors fleeing murderous mobs. That is not the reality of my life.
But, no, I don’t believe that “Jewish scriptures” contain as much truth as so many people seem to think that they do.
Back to Bondi. I highly doubt it, but perhaps we can surmise that she is hiding “the good stuff.” There may or may not be some indirect evidence for that case, and it may be convincing, or it may not be.
But if it can’t be proved, then in the eyes of the Law, it didn’t happen.
There was a famous Professor Anton who authenticated some copied ancient language characters as being real and genuine.
But when he asked to see the originals, he was told that unfortunately this was impossible because God had already taken the records back to Heaven.
Womp. Womp. Womp.
Well, that was the end of the good professor’s authentication: “I cannot read a closed book,” he said.
And he was absolutely right.
🙂
Pam Bondi reminds me of so many corporate executive women I’ve encountered over the years: they look good (both in looks and in the care they give their appearance), they have a veneer of intelligence, and they are adept at mouthing slogans and platitudes, which they repeat in various iterations and variations ad nauseam. In other words, good looking midwits (at best).
You sir, win a prize. Knuckleheads like bimbo Bondi are legion in both the public and private sectors. Systemic paralysis is inevitable, and these amoral prostitutes are certainly a significant factor.
I know she’s not corporate but is bondi worse than sarah palin in a battle of the dimwits?
Great article! Pam Bondi is so hot, I still say she worked a pole at a strip joint to pay for tuition. I can see it now. 🙃
Elizabeth Perkins in Big, bondi is not.
Epstein’s jew boostering goes way beyond the normal. He was a low-IQ college dropout, whose only job was a high school teacher, before being fired. He never traded, his bank experience was as a customer liazon officer. His 40 million dollar mansion was given to him by the Lauder jew of Victoria Secret fame. His wife’s dad was a Mosad agent killed by the Israeli government.
David M. Zsutty: Thus if a Jew—or a non-Jew with Jewish in-laws, business connections, and Zionist affiliations—is proposed as Special Counsel, we’ll know the fix is in…
—
We who are familiar with the JQ already know “the fix has been in” on the Epstein controversy. Thank you, David, for pointing out what may or may not eventually become obvious to the herd.
I’d rather remind folks today what Jews and their Allies did on Valentines Day to the German City of Dresden 82 years ago in a REAL holocaust: “Annual Commemoration – Dresden: A Real Holocaust” at nationalvanguard.org
THE NIGHT OF February 13th, and February 14th, Valentine’s Day, mark an ominous anniversary in the history of Western Civilization. For beginning on the night of February 13th, 1945, occurred the destruction of Dresden.
On the eve of Valentine’s Day, 1945, World War II in Europe was nearly over. For all practical purposes Germany was already defeated. Italy, and Germany’s other European allies, had fallen by the wayside. The Red Army was rushing to occupy vast areas of what had been Germany in the East, while the allies of the Soviets, the British and Americans, were bombing what was left of Germany’s defenses and food and transportation infrastructure into nonexistence…
Epstein aside for the moment, let us not forget. From historian David Irving’s Destruction of Dresden:
Just a few hours before Dresden had been a fairy-tale city of spires and cobbled streets . . . now total war had put an end to all that. . . . The ferocity of the US raid of 14th February had finally brought the people to their knees . . . but it was not the bombs which finally demoralised the people . . . it was the Mustang fighters, which suddenly appeared low over the city, firing on everything that moved . . . one section of the Mustangs concentrated on the river banks, where masses of bombed-out people had gathered. . . . British prisoners who had been released from their burning camps were among the first to suffer the discomfort of machine-gunning attacks . . . wherever columns of tramping people were marching in or out of the city they were pounced on by the fighters, and machine-gunned or raked with cannon fire.
Excellent that you remind everyone of the dark stain of Dresden Will. The fact that the dark rulers of our nations were willing to incinerate the hapless civilians of that poor city shows what they are willing to do in order to maintain power, and yet there are still Whites among us that think that playing legal and political games will free us. Freedom will be payed for with ordeal and agony. It has always been this way.
Thanks for noticing, Prototype. Neither I nor nearly all who read C-C were born when American and British pilots unnecessarily firebombed and strafed German refugees to death 82 years ago, but I will remind racial “patriots” today of that horrible misdeed.
Those who put ‘dresden’ in the search block at NV will find plenty of essays that detail the horrors of the Dresden holocaust, including this one by mainstream author Kurt Vonnegut: “The Blood of Dresden” at nationalvanguard.org.
Following is an extract from Armageddon in Retrospect in which the author describes the scenes of obscene brutality he witnessed as an American prisoner of war in Dresden, and which inspired his classic novel Slaughterhouse-Five and the film which was based on it. We don’t agree with the author’s idea at the end of the essay that the war should have been fought at all, but his eyewitness account makes this piece well worth reading…
by Kurt Vonnegut (pictured)
…Dresden was surely among the world’s most lovely cities. Her streets were broad, lined with shade-trees. She was sprinkled with countless little parks and statuary. She had marvelous old churches, libraries, museums, theatres, art galleries, beer gardens, a zoo, and a renowned university.
It was at one time a tourist’s paradise. They would be far better informed on the city’s delights than am I. But the impression I have is that in Dresden — in the physical city — were the symbols of the good life; pleasant, honest, intelligent. In the swastika’s shadow, those symbols of the dignity and hope of mankind stood waiting, monuments to truth. The accumulated treasure of hundreds of years, Dresden spoke eloquently of those things excellent in European civilization wherein our debt lies deep.
I was a prisoner, hungry, dirty, and full of hate for our captors, but I loved that city and saw the blessed wonder of her past and the rich promise of her future.
In February 1945, American bombers reduced this treasure to crushed stone and embers; disemboweled her with high explosives and cremated her with incendiaries.
The atom bomb may represent a fabulous advance, but it is interesting to note that primitive TNT and thermite managed to exterminate in one bloody night more people than died in the whole London blitz. Fortress Dresden fired a dozen shots at our airmen. Once back at their bases and sipping hot coffee, they probably remarked: “Flak unusually light tonight. Well, guess it’s time to turn in.” Captured British pilots from tactical fighter units (covering frontline troops) used to chide those who had flown heavy bombers on city raids with: “How on earth did you stand the stink of boiling urine and burning perambulators?”
A perfectly routine piece of news: “Last night our planes attacked Dresden. All planes returned safely.” The only good German is a dead one: over 100,000 evil men, women, and children (the able-bodied were at the fronts) forever purged of their sins against humanity. By chance, I met a bombardier who had taken part in the attack. “We hated to do it,” he told me.
The night they came over, we spent in an underground meat locker in a slaughterhouse. We were lucky, for it was the best shelter in town. Giants stalked the earth above us. First came the soft murmur of their dancing on the outskirts, then the grumbling of their plodding towards us, and finally the ear-splitting crashes of their heels upon us — and thence to the outskirts again. Back and forth they swept: saturation bombing.
“I screamed and I wept and I clawed the walls of our shelter,” an old lady told me. “I prayed to God to ‘please, please, please, dear God, stop them.’ But he didn’t hear me. No power could stop them. On they came, wave after wave. There was no way we could surrender; no way to tell them we couldn’t stand it any more. There was nothing anyone could do but sit and wait for morning.” Her daughter and grandson were killed.
Our little prison was burnt to the ground. We were to be evacuated to an outlying camp occupied by South African prisoners. Our guards were a melancholy lot, aged Volkssturmers and disabled veterans. Most of them were Dresden residents and had friends and families somewhere in the holocaust. A corporal, who had lost an eye after two years on the Russian front, ascertained before we marched that his wife, his two children, and both of his parents had been killed. He had one cigarette. He shared it with me.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.